Surgical resection of lung metastases from epithelial tumors

BACKGROUND: One of the main characteristics of malignant tumors is the capability to disseminate, giving rise to local or distant metastases. Pulmonary metastases occur in almost 30% of all oncology patients, and secondary lung tumors are more frequent than primary ones. Surgical resection of metastases is now a well-established procedure, but the results vary with the histologic type of the primary tumor. We wished to identify factors affecting late survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for epithelial tumors. METHODS: We have reviewed retrospectively data for 78 patients who underwent 101 curative resections of epithelial pulmonary metastases between January 1988 and December 2000 at our department. Potential prognostic factors affecting late survival, namely histology of the primary tumor, disease-free interval, number and size of resected lung metastases, involvement of lymph nodes, use of nonsurgical adjuvant therapy, and relapse of pulmonary metastases, were investigated. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality, and the postoperative course was uneventful in 91.1% of the procedures. The mean disease-free interval was 48.2 +/- 59.8 months, and the mean follow-up after the first pulmonary metastasectomy was 40.8 +/- 31.5 months. Mean overall survival was 81.0 +/- 10.0 months, and 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 47.4% and 37.7%, respectively. By univariate and multivariate analyses, the disease-free interval and the prognostic grouping system proposed by the International Registry of Lung Metastases were found to significantly influence the long-term survival. Presence of symptoms also showed an important influence. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of epithelial pulmonary metastases is safe and effective, and is associated with very low perioperative morbidity and mortality and a reasonable 5-year and 10-year survival. In the present study, the disease-free interval influenced significantly the long-term survival. Our results did not differ significantly from (and in many cases compared favorably with) those described in the literature.     

Results of lung metastasectomy from breast cancer: prognostic criteria on the basis of 467 cases of the International Registry of Lung Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Metastatic breast cancer is still defined as an incurable disease. Although the prognosis after resection of isolated metastases to the lung is much better than after chemotherapy most oncologists and gynecologists disapprove of lung metastasectomy. METHODS: In order to summarize the experience of pulmonary metastatic surgery and to achieve more relevant data by an increased number of cases, we evaluate the data of the International Registry of Lung Metastases of 467 patients having lung metastases from breast cancer with regard to long-term survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: In 84% a complete metastatic resection was possible. The survival rates are 38% after 5 years, 22% after 10 years, and 20% after 15 years. Prognostic factors are a disease-free interval of > or = 36 months with 5-year survival of 45%, a 10-year survival of 26% and a 15-year survival of 21% (P=0.0001), solitary lung metastasis is associated with a survival rate of 44% after 5 years and of 23% after 10 and 15 years, but this is not statistically significant compared to multiple metastases. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by Pastorino and the International Registry of Lung Metastases based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastases and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed 5-year survival of 50%, 10- and 15-year survival of 26% with a median survival of 59 months. CONCLUSION: Considering the low morbidity and mortality rate, we think that lung metastasectomy today is the best treatment option in selected cases of lung metastases from breast cancer.     

Long-term survival after resection of pulmonary metastases from carcinoma of the breast.

Resection of isolated pulmonary metastases may yield improved survival in select patients. Between 1981 and 1991, 44 women (median age, 55 years) with a history of breast cancer underwent 47 thoracotomies with no operative deaths and only three minor postoperative complications (3/47, 6.4%). Confirmation of the metastatic origin of the lung lesion was made by direct histological comparison with the primary. Three patients had benign nodules and were excluded, and 4 patients had less than complete resection at thoracotomy. The median survival after thoracotomy of the remaining 37 patients with completely resected metastases was 47 +/- 5.5 months, and their actuarial 5-year survival was 49.5%. Patients with a disease-free interval of longer than 12 months had a longer survival (median survival, 82 +/- 6 months; 5-year survival, 57%) than patients with a disease-free interval of 12 months or less (median survival, 15 +/- 3.6 months; 5-year survival, 0%) (p = 0.004). Patients with estrogen receptor-positive status (n = 14) tended to have longer survival after resection than patients with estrogen receptor-negative status (n = 15) (median survival, 81 +/- 9 months versus 23 +/- 6 months, respectively; p = 0.098). Other clinical variables analyzed did not predict survival after thoracotomy. We conclude that resection of pulmonary metastases in patients with breast cancer can be done safely and may result in long-term survival for a substantial number of patients. Patients with a disease-free interval of longer than 12 months have an excellent prognosis after complete resection.     

Surgical treatment of solitary adrenal metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Management of solitary adrenal metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer is still debated. Although classically considered incurable, various reports with small numbers of patients have shown that surgical treatment might improve long-term survival. The aim of this study was to review our experience and to identify factors that could affect survival. METHODS: From January 1989 through April 2003, 23 patients underwent complete resection of an isolated adrenal metastasis after surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. There were 19 men and 4 women, with a mean age of 54 +/- 10 years. The diagnosis of adrenal metastasis was synchronous with the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer in 6 patients and metachronous in 17 patients. The median disease-free interval for patients with metachronous metastasis was 12.5 months (range, 4.5-60.1 months). RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival was 23.3%. Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that a disease-free interval of greater than 6 months was an independent and significant predictor of increased survival in patients after adrenalectomy. All patients with a disease-free interval of less than 6 months died within 2 years of the operation. The 5-year survival was 38% after resection of an isolated adrenal metastasis that occurred more than 6 months after lung resection. Adjuvant therapy and pathologic staging of non-small cell lung cancer did not affect survival. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of metachronous isolated adrenal metastasis with a disease-free interval of greater than 6 months can provide long-term survival in patients previously undergoing complete resection of the primary non-small cell lung cancer.     

Surgery of female genital tract tumour lung metastases

IntroductionLung metastases originating from tumors of the female genital tract are rare. Due to this rarity and their variable histology, it has been difficult to compare different patient series.Material and methodsA retrospective study of patients who underwent resection of lung metastases of female genital tract tumors (uterine, fallopian and cervical cancer) during the period from 01/01/1989 to 12/31/2006. Epidemiological, diagnostic and treatment data were collected. Non-parametric tests and the survival analysis were performed using the Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test.ResultsDuring the study period, 27 underwent resection. Mean disease-free interval (DFI) from initial diagnosis to the diagnosis of metastasis was 58 months (1–195 months). Mean survival from the diagnosis of metastasis was 94 months. The overall 5-year survival after diagnosis of metastasis was 84.1%. A second surgery for metastasis was performed on 5 patients (18.5%). Survival after second surgery of metastases was 80.5 months. Five-year survivals from diagnosis of metastasis were: endometrial carcinoma 100%; cervical cancer 62.5%; uterine sarcoma 60%. Adjuvant hormone therapy was prescribed in15 out of 16 patients with endometrial carcinoma. There was a statistically significant difference in survival depending on the histological type and disease free interval.ConclusionSurgical treatment of lung metastases originating from female genital tract tumors (mainly endometrial carcinoma) is associated with a high long-term survival.     

Prognostic factors and survival after resection of lung metastases from epithelial tumours

Lung metastasectomy is an accepted treatment for selected patients with pulmonary metastases. Resectability, disease-free interval and number of metastases are well characterised prognostic indicators after lung metastasectomy. Patients treated with lung metastasectomy for epithelial tumours were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and forty-two patients were reviewed. The rate of mediastinal node metastases was 12%. Overall 5-year survival rate was 36% with a median survival time of 47 months. Recurrence rate after lung metastasectomy was 50%. Five-year disease-free survival was 26% with a median of 29 months. Mediastinal nodal status negatively affected survival at univariate analysis (5-years 32% for N+ and 40% for N-, P=0.013). Disease-free survival was significantly different according to nodal status: 5-year disease-free survival 17 and 28% for N+ and N-, respectively (P=0.053). Systemic recurrences were more frequent in patients with nodal involvement (P=0.058). Mediastinal nodal involvement resulted in a significant prognostic factor at multivariate analysis (N+: RRD=3.0; 95% CI 1.3-6.7). Patients with pulmonary metastases and nodal involvement had a poor prognosis and relapsed early after pulmonary metastasectomy. Nodal status should be considered in the selection of patients for lung metastasectomy.     

Resection of lung metastases from soft-tissue sarcomas. A multivariate analysis.

From 1970 through 1986, 78 patients underwent 162 thoracotomies for removal of lung metastases from soft-tissue sarcomas. A multivariate analysis showed that the presence of a local recurrence, an incomplete pulmonary resection, and a shorter disease-free interval were poor prognostic factors. Patients who underwent multiple thoracotomies survived longer from the time of initial thoracotomy. The histologic type of sarcoma and the number of metastases resected showed no statistical significance. The median survival of the 61 patients who had a complete resection was 21 months. Patients with five or fewer metastases resected had an overall 5-year survival of 22% compared with 21% for patients who had six or more metastases resected. However, patients with five or fewer metastases showed a trend toward a higher 10-year disease-free survival. A complete resection of pulmonary metastases from soft-tissue sarcoma can prolong survival even if multiple metastases are present, although patients with fewer metastases may have a longer disease-free survival.     

Treatment strategy for hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer

Over the past 25 years, 125 patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent 167 hepatectomies in our department. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates after the initial hepatectomy were 90%, 58%, and 51%, respectively, and those after repeated hepatectomy were 88%, 60%, and 42%, respectively. The predictive factors significantly associated with poor prognosis after initial hepatectomy were maximal diameter of metastasis (> or = 5 cm), distribution pattern in the liver (multiple bilobar), number of nodules (> or = four), and presence of extrahepatic metastases. A disease-free interval of > 6 months after initial hepatectomy was a significant factor for prolongation of survival after repeat hepatectomy. Patients with hilar node metastases at the initial hepatectomy did not receive a survival benefit from hepatectomy, while 5 patients underwent repeat hepatectomy with lymphadenectomy for remnant liver and hilar node metastases with a disease-free interval of > 8 months and 4 of them survived for > 5 years. Our treatment strategies for colorectal hepatic metastases are as follows: 1) hepatectomy is the first choice for < 4 liver metastases without extrahepatic disease; 2) a careful evaluation for liver resection is performed for patients with > or = 4 liver metastases receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy because of the high frequency of hepatic and/or extrahepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy; 3) the presence of hilar node metastases at the initial hepatectomy should be excluded from surgical indications; 4) simultaneous single metastasis limited to the lung is an indication for lung resection; and 5) a suitable indication for repeat hepatectomy for hepatic recurrence is patients with a longer disease-free interval. Aggressive surgery based on the optimum patient selection can contribute to clinical benefit, including long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases.     

Survival after operations for colorectal cancer in patients aged 75 years or over.

OBJECTIVE: To define factors that predict mortality and survival in patients with colorectal cancer who are aged 75 or over. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital, Finland. SUBJECTS: 231 patients aged 75 or over who were admitted to hospital with colorectal cancer during the 14-year period 1980-93. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity, mortality, recurrence, and survival. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality after any kind of operation was 8/211 (4%), and 8/175 (5%) of those who had their tumours resected. Morbidity was 35/175 (20%). Factors associated with mortality were weight loss, Dukes'stage, extent of resection, and type of operation. Overall 5-year survival was 28%, overall 10-year survival was 4%, and median survival was 33 months (range 0-150). Survival was most closely related to Duke's stage, extent of resection, and recurrent disease on univariate analysis, but multivariate analysis identified only mode of recurrence (p < 0.0001), recurrent disease (p < 0.004), and extent of resection (p < 0.009) as independent predictors of survival. The recurrence rate after radical resection was 49/141 (35%) and the median disease-free interval was 10 months (range 4-64). Mortality after resection for recurrent cancer was 3/17 (18%) and morbidity 5/17 (29%). CONCLUSION: Age alone is not a risk factor for postoperative mortality or a predictor of long-term survival. Low mortality and acceptable long-term survival can be achieved in patients aged 75 or over if those with extensive distant metastases, and those whose general condition is too poor to stand a major operation, are treated conservatively.     

Prognostic factors and survival after pulmonary resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary metastasectomy as well as immunotherapy have reproducible, albeit limited efficacy in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We examined whether metastasectomy improved overall survival compared with results of immunotherapy. METHODS: Between 1975 and 2003, 64 patients (41 men, 23 women) underwent pulmonary resection of metastatic RCC. Only patients who met the criteria for potentially curative operation, that means, control of primary tumor, ability to resect metastatic disease and no other extrapulmonary metastases, were included. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival was 33.4% (median survival: 39.2 months). A significant longer survival was observed using multivariate analysis in patients with complete pulmonary resection (R0), with a 5-year survival of 39.9% and a median survival of 46.6 months in correlation to patients with incomplete resection (5-year survival 0%, median survival 13.3 months). In multivariate analysis patients with synchronous metastases had a significant worse prognosis in correlation to patients with metachronous metastases. The 5-year survival of curative resected patients with metachronous metastases was 43.7% versus 0% for synchronous metastases, respectively. In patients with solitary metastasis and R0 resection, we observed a 5-year survival of 49%, whereas the rate was 23% in patients with more than a single metastasis. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by the International Registry based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastasis and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed a 5-year survival of 52% (median survival 75.2 months). CONCLUSION: Metastasectomy nowadays is the best treatment option in cases with technical resectable metastases with as much as possible good prognostic factors (metachronous metastases with long DFI, number up to 6 metastases).     

Resection of lung metastases: long-term results and prognostic analysis based on 5206 cases--the International Registry of Lung Metastases

The International Registry of Lung Metastases was established in 1991 to asses the long-term results of pulmonary metastasectomy. The Registry has accrued 5206 cases of lung metastasectomy, from 18 departments of thoracic surgery in Europe (n = 13), USA (n = 4) and Canada (n = 1). Of these patients 4572 (88%) underwent complete surgical resection. The primary tumor was epithelial in 2260 (43%), sarcoma in 2173 (42%), germ cell in 363 (7%), and melanoma in 328 (6%) patients. The disease-free interval was 0 to 11 months in 1729 (33%) cases, 12 to 35 months in 1857 (36%) and more than 36 months in 1620 (31%). Single metastases accounted for 2383 (46%) cases and multiple lesions for 2726 (52%). Mean follow up was 46 months. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival, relative risk of death and multivariate Cox model. The actuarial survival after complete metastasectomy was 36% at 5 years, 26% at 10 years and 22% at 15 years (median 35 months); the corresponding values for incomplete resection were 13% at 5 years and 7% at 10 years (median 15 months). Among complete resections, the 5-year survival was 33% for patients with a disease free-interval of 0 to 11 months and 45% for those with a disease-free interval of more than 36 months; 43% for single lesions and 27 for four or more lesions. Multivariate analysis showed a better prognosis for patients with germ cell tumors, disease-free interval of 36 months and more and single metastases. These results confirm that lung metastasectomy is a safe and potentially curative procedure.     

Survival Analysis of Resection of Lung Metastases From Colorectal Cancer

IntroductionThe publication of the International Registry of Lung Metastases (IRLM) in 1997 was a turning point in favor of surgical resection of lung metastases. Prognostic groups were defined according to resectability, number of metastases, and disease-free interval. The objective of this study was to determine survival in patients who underwent resection of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma and to evaluate how applicable the prognostic factors established by the IRLM are in this specific patient group.Patients and MethodsPatients with lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma who underwent resection between January 1, 2000, and November 30, 2006, were retrospectively analyzed. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with log-rank comparisons between groups.ResultsSurvivals at 1, 3, 5, and 6 years was 92%, 75%, 54%, and 43%, respectively. The main finding was that 3-year survival was better in patients who underwent atypical resection of the metastasis (75%) than those who required lobectomy (55%). There were no significant differences in survival in terms of number of lung metastases resected or disease-free interval.ConclusionsSurvival in patients requiring lobectomy for resection of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma was worse than in those who underwent atypical resection. The number of metastases and disease-free interval may be questionable prognostic factors in the case of lung metastases from colorectal carcinoma.     

Sequential hepatic and pulmonary resections for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Resection of pulmonary or hepatic colorectal metastases is associated with a 5-year survival rate of 25-40 per cent. This report analyses outcome following sequential resection of colorectal metastases to both organs. METHODS: Seventeen patients with histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma and resection of liver and lung metastases were identified from a prospective database. RESULTS: The median interval between resection of the primary tumour and first metastasis was 21 (range 0-64) months. The interval between resection of the first and subsequent metastases was 18 (range 1-74) months. No patient died in the postoperative period and there were two perioperative complications. The overall survival rate in 17 patients was 70 per cent at 2 years from resection of metastasis to the second organ, but the disease-free survival rate at 2 years was only 24 per cent. CONCLUSION: Although few long-term survivors were observed in this small series, sequential resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases is warranted in a highly selected group of patients.     

Pulmonary metastases from uterine malignancies: results of surgical resection in 133 patients

OBJECTIVE: The long-term results of the surgical treatment for patients with pulmonary metastases from uterine malignancies were clarified. METHODS: A total of 133 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for uterine malignancies were enrolled in the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan between March 1984 and February 2002. These patients constituted the study population, and their clinical, pathologic, and prognostic data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The morbidity and mortality rates related to the operation were minimal (1% and 1%, respectively). The 5- and 10-year survivals after the surgical resection in all cases were 54.6% and 44.9%, respectively. The 5-year survivals for each histologic type were estimated to be 46.8% for squamous cell carcinoma (n = 58), 40.3% for cervical adenocarcinoma (n = 13), 75.7% for endometrial adenocarcinoma (n = 23), 86.5% for choriocarcinoma (n = 16), and 37.9% for leiomyosarcoma (n = 11). In the univariate analysis, the following were shown to be associated with poor survival: primary tumor in the cervix, short disease-free interval (<12 months), large number of resected metastases (> or =4), and large tumor size (> or =3 cm). After mutual adjustment, short disease-free interval (<12 months) alone was related to risk of death (hazard ratio = 2.26, 95% confidence interval = 1.06-4.78) for 105 patients, excluding patients with choriocarcinoma and miscellaneous histologic types. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary metastasectomy for uterine malignancies is a safe and acceptable treatment to improve survival. Patients with a disease-free interval of 12 months or more are good candidates for this treatment if there is adequate control of the primary tumor without extrapulmonary metastasis.     

Long-term results of surgical resection of lung metastases

Between 1990 and 2000, 56 consecutive patients underwent lung resection for removal of metastatic disease. Mortality, disease-free interval, and overall survival were studied. Only patients with a complete follow-up were included and data were collected conform the protocol of the International Registry of Lung Metastases. The primary tumour in our series was an epithelial tumour in 25 patients (45%), sarcoma in 15 (27%), germ cell tumours in 11 (19%) and melanoma in 5. Operative mortality was 1.4% (1 out of 73 procedures). Germ cell tumours had the best survival (76% at 5 years), and melanoma the worst (0% at 5 years). Multivariate analysis showed that survival for patients who underwent 2 or more metastasectomies was surprisingly good with a 5-year survival rate of 46%. Survival was not related to disease-free interval, multiple lung metastases, or pneumonectomy. It is in accordance with some reports that a short disease-free interval, numerous lung metastases, or recurrence after the first metastasectomy should not preclude patients from operation.     

Pulmonary Resection for Colorectal Cancer Metastases: Duration Between Cancer Onset and Lung Metastasis as an Important Prognostic Factor

Background  Pulmonary resection is the most effective treatment available for colorectal lung metastases. However, the characteristics of those patients most likely to benefit from surgical resection have not yet been adequately clarified. We have made a critical analysis for the potential prognostic factors and their clinical significance in lung metastasis from colorectal cancer. Methods  We analyzed 63 consecutive patients who underwent curative pulmonary resection for colorectal lung metastases at National Taiwan University Hospital from January 1997 to December 2006. Median follow-up was 37.3 (range 12–122) months. Disease-free and overall survival rates were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier analysis, and multivariate analyses of various prognostic characteristics were performed. Results  Overall 5-year survival and disease-free survival rates were 43.9% and 19.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the interval for development of lung metastases from primary colorectal cancer and the mode of operation were the only two independent prognostic factors for survival. With regard to disease-free survival, the interval between initial resection of colorectal cancer and following lung metastases was the only significant independent prognostic factor. Besides, subset analysis showed that the 5-year survival rate in repeated resection group for recurrence of colorectal metastasis in residual lung was 85.7%. Conclusion  Pulmonary resection, initial or even repeated resection for metastatic tumor from colorectal cancer should be encouraged for selected patients as it can significantly improve survival. Patients who have lung metastases within 1 year after primary tumor resection and those who do not undergo anatomical resection for metastatic lung tumor should be followed more carefully due to poor prognosis.     

Surgical management of recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases

The optimal treatment for recurrent lesions after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is controversial. We report the outcome of aggressive surgery for recurrent disease after the initial hepatectomy and the influence on quality of life of such treatment. Forty-five (70%) of the 64 surviving patients developed recurrence after the initial hepatectomy for liver metastases. The determinants of hepatic recurrence were the distribution and the number of liver metastases. Twenty-eight (62%) of patients with recurrence underwent resection. A second hepatectomy was performed in 20 patients, and a third hepatectomy was done in 5 patients. Ten patients with pulmonary metastasis underwent partial lung resection on 14 occasions, while resection of brain metastases was performed in 3 patients on 5 occasions. There were no operative deaths after resection of recurrent disease. The morbidity rate was 28% after repeat hepatectomy, 21% after pulmonary resection, and 0% after resection of brain metastasis. The Karnofsky performance status (PS) after the last surgery was not significantly different from that after the initial hepatectomy. The 3- and 5-year survival rates after the second hepatectomy were 54% and 14%, respectively. The 3-and 5-year survival rates of the patients undergoing resection of extrahepatic recurrence were both 17%. The survival rate after resection of recurrent disease (n=28) was significantly better than that of patients (n=17) with unresectable recurrence (P < 0.05). For the 66 patients with colorectal liver metastases, the 5-year survival rate after initial hepatectomy was 50%. The distribution and the number of liver metastases and the presence of extrahepatic disease, as single factors, significantly affected prognosis after the initial hepatectomy. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the presence of extrahepatic metastasis and a disease-free interval of less than 6 months were independent predictors of survival after the initial and second hepatectomy, respectively. It is concluded that aggressive surgery is an effective strategy for selected patients with recurrence after initial hepatectomy. Careful selection of candidates for repeat surgery will yield increased clinical benefit, including long-term survival.     

Outcomes after resection of synchronous or metachronous hepatic and pulmonary colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection of isolated hepatic or pulmonary colorectal metastases prolongs survival in selected patients. But the benefits of resection and appropriate selection criteria in patients who develop both hepatic and pulmonary metastases are ill defined. STUDY DESIGN: Data were prospectively collected from 131 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases over a 20-year period. Median followup was 6.6 years from the time of resection of the primary tumor. Patient, treatment, and outcomes variables were analyzed using log-rank, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: The site of first metastasis was the liver in 65% of patients, the lung in 11%, and both simultaneously in 24%. Multiple hepatic metastases were present in 51% of patients, and multiple pulmonary metastases were found in 48%. Hepatic lobectomy or trisegmentectomy was required in 61% of patients; most lung metastases (80%) were treated with wedge excisions. Median survival rates from resection of the primary disease, first site of metastasis, and second site of metastasis were 6.9, 5.0, and 3.3 years, respectively. After resection of disease at the second site of metastasis, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 91%, 55%, 31%, and 19%, respectively. An analysis of prognostic factors revealed that survival was significantly longer when the disease-free interval between the development of the first and second sites of metastases exceeded 1 year, in patients with a single liver metastasis, and in patients younger than 55 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of both hepatic and pulmonary colorectal metastases is associated with prolonged survival in selected patients. Patients with a longer disease-free interval between metastases and those with single liver lesions had the best outcomes.     

Longterm results after resection of simultaneous and sequential lung and liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Although simple lung or liver metastasectomy from colorectal cancer have proved effective in selected patients, the value of simultaneous biorgan metastasectomies is still debated. STUDY DESIGN: Of 155 patients who underwent operation for lung or liver colorectal metastases between March 1987 and December 1998, we retrospectively reviewed 29 patients who presented simultaneous (n = 12) or sequential liver-->lung (n = 10) and lung-->liver (n = 7) metastases. All metastases were successfully resected in a total of 56 separate procedures. In 35 thoracic procedures, 45 metastases were removed by wedge resection (n = 36) or lobectomy (n = 9). In addition, 47 liver metastases were resected with wedge (n = 24), segmentectomy (n = 13), or lobectomy (n = 10). There were no perioperative deaths and the morbidity rate was low (10.7%). All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 years. Factors possibly influencing survival were evaluated by univariate and subsequently by multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Median survival from the second metastasectomy was 41 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 51.3%. Risk factor distribution among the three metastastic pattern groups was insignificant. Premetastasectomy elevated levels of both CEA and CA19-9 (p = 0.0001), and mediastinal or celiac lymph node status (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with survival in the univariate analysis, although number of metastasectomies, disease-free interval, and simultaneous versus sequential diagnosis were not. In the multivariate analysis, only elevated CEA plus CA19-9 (p = 0.01) was significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that either simultaneous or sequential lung and liver metastasectomy can be successfully treated by surgery. Poor results were obtained in the presence of high levels of CEA plus CA19-9.     

根治性手术切除结直肠癌肺转移灶的临床疗效及预后影响因素分析

目的探讨根治性手术切除结直肠癌肺转移灶的临床疗效及预后影响因素。方法采用回顾性队列研究方法。收集2004年1月至2015年12月北京大学肿瘤医院收治的63例结直肠癌肺转移病人的临床病理资料;男35例,女28例;年龄为(57±12)岁。病人均行原发灶和结直肠癌肺转移灶根治性R 0切除术。观察指标:(1)诊断及治疗情况。(2)随访及生存情况。(3)预后影响因素分析。采用门诊和电话方式进行随访,了解病人术后生存情况,随访时间截至2018年12月。正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,偏态分布的计量资料以M(范围)表示。计数资料以绝对数或百分比表示。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率并绘制生存曲线,单因素分析采用Log-rank检验,多因素分析采用COX比例风险模型。结果(1)诊断及治疗情况:63例结直肠癌肺转移病人中,同时性肺转移6例,异时性肺转移57例。18例病人胸部X线片检查初始发现肺部可疑转移灶,经X线计算机体层摄影术(CT)检查进一步证实为肺转移灶,45例病人胸部CT检查初始发现肺转移灶。63例病人均行原发灶和肺转移灶根治性R 0切除术。22例病人行纵隔淋巴结清扫,其中2例各有1枚纵隔淋巴结转移。所有病人术后恢复良好,未出现严重并发症。63例病人中,57例接受>6个月以氟尿嘧啶类药物为主的术后辅助化疗及靶向治疗。(2)随访及生存情况:63例病人均获得术后随访,随访时间为8~143个月,中位随访时间为58个月。63例病人中,19例死亡,24例出现二次复发,5年复发率为38.1%(24/63),复发时间为18个月(3~58个月)。24例二次复发病人中,19例发生肺转移,3例发生脑转移,2例发生骨转移,2例发生肝转移。同1例病人可同时发生多处转移。24例二次复发病人中,5例行再次手术治疗,19例行化疗和放化疗。63例病人5年总体生存率为62.7%。(3)预后影响因素分析:单因素分析结果为原发灶部位、肺转移灶数目和肺转移灶切除术前癌胚抗原水平是影响结直肠癌肺转移病人预后的相关因素(χ²=4.162、7.175、6.725,P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:肺转移灶数目和肺转移灶切除术前癌胚抗原水平是结直肠癌肺转移病人预后的独立影响因素(风险比=2.725,2.778,95%可信区间为1.051~7.064、1.072~7.021,P<0.05)。结论根治性手术切除结直肠癌肺转移灶安全、可行。肺转移灶数目和肺转移灶切除术前癌胚抗原水平是结直肠癌肺转移病人预后的独立影响因素。