Cardiac valve replacement in the elderly: clinical performance of biological prostheses

From 1975 to 1987, 1,127 elderly patients underwent 1,223 valve replacements with the Carpentier-Edwards standard or supraannular porcine bioprostheses in 1,147 operations. Of the total patient population seen during these years, 33.5% receiving a standard porcine bioprosthesis and 48.6% receiving a supraannular bioprosthesis were 65 years of age or older. Of this elderly patient population, 465 patients were between 65 and 69 years old; 618 patients, 70 and 79 years old; and 52 patients, 80 years old and older. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 635 patients, mitral valve replacement in 417 patients, tricuspid valve replacement in 2 patients, and multiple-valve replacement in 80 patients. The cumulative follow-up was 3,957 patient-years. Early mortality was 9.5%: 7.3% for the 65- to 69-year-old group, 10.7% for the 70- to 79-year-old group, and 15.4% for the group 80 years old and older. Late mortality was 5.5% per patient-year: 4.2% per patient-year for the 65- to 69-year-old group, 6.3% per patient-year for the 70- to 79-year-old group, and 14.1% per patient-year for the group 80 years old and older. Valve-related causes contributed to 7 early deaths and 33 late deaths. The overall patient survival, including operative deaths, was 70.7% +/- 1.6% at 5 years and 47.8% +/- 3.7% at 10 and 12 years. The freedom from all valve-related complications was 52.1% +/- 6.1% at 10 and 12 years. The overall rate of valve-related complications was 5.0% per patient-year (fatal complications, 1.13% per patient-year). The overall rate of thromboembolism was 2.3% per patient-year and the freedom from thromboembolism, 69.6% +/- 5.2% at 10 and 12 years. The freedom from structural valve deterioration was 80.8% +/- 8.1% at 10 and 12 years: 71.7% +/- 11.0% at 10 and 12 years for the 65- to 69-year-old group, 97.9% +/- 1.2% at 10 years for the 70- to 79-year-old group, and 100% at 12 years for the group 80 years old and older. At 10 and 12 years, the freedom from valve-related death was 83.7% +/- 4.3% and the freedom from reoperation, 73.3% +/- 8.6%. The freedom from valve-related death, residual morbidity from thromboembolism and anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, and reoperation was 61.7% +/- 7.0% at 10 and 12 years. The clinical performance of porcine bioprostheses in the elderly patient population has been excellent. The early mortality increases in patients 70 years old or older.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Elderly valve replacement with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Comparison by composites of complications

AIM: The goal of aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery in the elderly (= or >75 years) is to extend survival and minimize valve-related morbidity, mortality and reoperation. As the elderly population lives longer, those with implanted valves are at risk of suffering valve related complications. We hypothesize that bioprostheses are appropriate for the elderly. METHODS: The follow-up evaluation of 966 patients with valves (AVR, 666; mitral valve replacements [MVR], 226; multiple valve replacements [MR], 74) implanted between 1975 and 1999 was examined. There were 879 bioprotheses (BP) and 87 mechanical prostheses (MP). The mean age was 78.9+/-3.3 years (range 75-94.6 years). Concomitant coronary artery bypass was performed in AVR in 51.7%, MVR in 50.4% and MR in 28.4%. Valve type, valve lesion, coronary artery bypass (previous/concomitant), age and gender were considered as independent predictors of composites and survival. The total follow-up was 3905 patient-years. RESULTS: Early mortality was for AVR 9.6% (64), MVR 15.0% (34) and MR 25.7% (19). The late mortality was for AVR 8.8%, MVR 10.4% and MR 8.8%/patient-year. The only independent predictor of survival and valve-related mortality, morbidity and reoperation was age for survival in those with AVR, hazard ratio 1.15 [CL 1.03-1.27] p=0.0094). The BP reoperative rate was 0.5%/patient-year (reoperation was fatal in 6/15) of total, MP reoperative rate was 0% [reasons for reoperation structural valve deterioration (4), non-structural dysfunction (6), prosthetic valve endocarditis (5), reoperation fatality due to non-structural dysfunction (2), prosthetic valve endocarditis (4)]. Overall patient survival at 10 and 15 years, respectively, was 30.5+/-2.4% and 3.6+/-2.2% irrespective of valve position and type. Overall actual and actuarial freedom from valve-related morbidity at 15 years was 96.8+/-0.9% and 93.7+/-2.3%, respectively. Actual and actuarial overall freedom from valve-related mortality at 15 years was 84.3+/-2.4% and 58.4+/-0.9%, respectively. Overall actual and actuarial freedom from valve related reoperation at 15 years was 95.8+/-1.6% and 74.8+/-16.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BP valves are further confirmed to be a good option for AVR in patients = or >75 years of age.     

Aortic valve selection in the elderly patient

To determine the influence of valve selection on valve-related morbidity and mortality and patient survival, comparative long-term performance characteristics of mechanical (N = 68) and bioprosthetic (N = 73) heart valves were analyzed for 141 patients more than 70 years old who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement between 1970 and 1985. Cumulative patient follow-up was 491 patient-years (average, 4.3 years per patient). Hospital mortality was 18% and 19% for patients with mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves, respectively. Survival at 5 years was 61 +/- 7% (+/- the standard error) and 67 +/- 10% for recipients of mechanical valves and bioprosthetic valves, respectively. Male sex (p = 0.014) and urgency of operation (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for hospital mortality. Atrial fibrillation increased valve-related mortality (p = 0.01). No patient required reoperation or experienced structural valve failure. While anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was increased in recipients of mechanical valves (9.2 +/- 2.1%/patient-year) compared with recipients of bioprosthetic valves (2.3 +/- 1.1%/patient-year), it did not result in a death or lead to permanent disability. There was no difference in freedom from any valve-related complication at 5 years. However, when all morbid events are considered, recipients of bioprosthetic valves experienced fewer valve-related complications than patients receiving mechanical valves (10.7 +/- 2.3%/patient-year versus 17.6 +/- 2.5%/patient-year, respectively; p less than 0.05). The reduced incidence of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage and the infrequent need for warfarin sodium anticoagulation favor selection of a bioprosthetic heart valve in patients older than 70 years.     

Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study

Valve-related morbidity and mortality after heart valve replacement with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis has been retrospectively analyzed. From June 1974 through December 1976, 253 Hancock I bioprostheses (150 mitral and 103 aortic) were inserted in 220 selected patients who survived the operation and had follow-up until June 1989 (mean follow-up 13.5 years, with an accumulative follow-up of 2956.4 patient-years). One hundred seventeen patients had mitral valve replacement, 70 had aortic valve replacement, and 33 had combined mitral and aortic valve replacement. There were 27 thromboembolic events. The probability of being free from thromboembolism at 14 years was 81.0% +/- 7.4% for the mitral valve replacement group, 85.4% +/- 6.7% for the aortic group, and 67.1% +/- 18.4% for the mitral-aortic group. Fifteen episodes of prosthetic valve endocarditis occurred. There were 10 instances of nonstructural dysfunction (paravalvular leaks) in seven mitral valves (4.6%) and in three aortic valves (2.9%). One hundred twenty-two bioprostheses in 106 patients resulted in structural deterioration. The probability of freedom from structural deterioration at 14 years was 37.2% +/- 3.9% for the mitral group, 43.9% +/- 7.1% for the aortic group, and 30.1% +/- 8.9% for the mitral-aortic group. The logistic regression analysis between age at the time of operation and bioprosthetic life (structural deterioration-free period) demonstrates a linear regression curve (r = 0.53). There were 56 late deaths (27 patients died at reoperation). The actuarial survival rate (including hospital mortality) at 14 years was 57.2% +/- 5.4% for the entire series, with no statistically significant difference between groups. The probability of remaining free from valve-related morbidity and mortality at 14 years was 16.7% +/- 4.8% for the mitral group, 20.8% +/- 6.2% for the aortic group, and 14.0% +/- 7.0% for the mitral-aortic group. The long-term results of this series show that the clinical performance of the Hancock I porcine valve appears satisfactory during the first 6 years. The behavior of this bioprosthesis at 14 years' follow-up changes drastically, because only a minor group of patients is free from valve-related complications, justifying the restriction of its use for selected patients.     

Simultaneous implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic and mitral prostheses

Since January 1980, 92 consecutive patients received St. Jude Medical aortic and mitral prostheses simultaneously. Mean age was 57.6 years (standard deviation 12.4); 14 were 70 years or older. Twenty-three had a previous cardiac operation and 22 had additional procedures performed at the time of double valve replacement. Before the operation 62% of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III and 29% were in class IV or required emergency operation. There were six (6.5%) deaths within 30 days. None of the hospital deaths were valve related; all occurred in patients who had additional risk concerns. Follow-up is 100% complete and ranges from 2 to 80 months, totaling 242 patient-years (mean 33.8 months). All except four hospital survivors reached class I or II and 40 patients (47%) remain asymptomatic. The actuarial survival rates are 82% at 1 year, 70% at 3 years, and 60% at 5 years. Causes of late death include heart failure (10), sudden, unexplained death (five), reoperation for coronary artery disease (one), noncardiac (four), and valve related (five). The linearized rate of fatal valve-related events is 2.1% pt-yr. A total of 22 valve-related complications (including five fatal) occurred is 18 patients, for a linearized rate or incidence of 9.1%/pt-yr. Eleven thromboembolic episodes (rate 4.6%/pt-yr) occurred in nine patients; three of these (1.2%/pt-yr) were fatal. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications represented 64% of all valve-related complications. Four patients had six episodes of prosthetic valve endocarditis (incidence 2.5%/pt-yr), of which one (incidence 0.4%/pt-yr) was fatal. Paravalvular leak contributed to the fifth valve-related death. At 5 years, 83% of patients were free of thromboembolic complications; 94% were free of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage; and 71% were free of all valve-related complications. There are few comparable data for patients who have had simultaneous replacement of aortic and mitral valves with other mechanical prostheses. The total incidence of valve-related complications for patients with bioprostheses ranges between 3.9%/pt-yr and 10.4%/pt-yr and is similar to the 9.1%/pt-yr observed in the present series. The type of valve-related complication (thromboemboli and bleeding versus valve deterioration) is the principal difference between St. Jude Medical and bioprosthetic valves in patients who require simultaneous replacement of aortic and mitral valves.     

Allografts for aortic valve or root replacement: insights from an 18-year single-center prospective follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: Whether allografts are the biological valve of choice for AVR in non-elderly patients remains a topic of debate. In this light we analyzed our ongoing prospective allograft AVR cohort and compared allograft durability with other biological aortic valve substitutes. METHODS: Between April 1987 and October 2005, 336 patients underwent 346 allograft AVRs (95 subcoronary, 251 root replacement). Patient and perioperative characteristics, cumulative survival, freedom from reoperation, and valve-related events were analyzed. Using microsimulation, for adult patients, age-matched actual freedom from allograft reoperation was compared to porcine and pericardial bioprostheses. RESULTS: Mean age was 45 years (range 1 month to 83 years); 72% were males. Etiology was mainly endocarditis 32% (active 22%), congenital 31%, degenerative 9%, and aneurysm/dissection 12%. Twenty-seven percent underwent prior cardiac surgery. Hospital mortality was 5.5% (N=19). During follow-up (mean 7.4 years, maximum 18.5 years, 98% complete), 54 patients died; there were 57 valve-related reoperations (3 early technical, 11 non-structural, 39 structural valve deterioration (SVD), 4 endocarditis), 5 cerebrovascular accidents, 1 fatal bleeding, 8 endocarditis. Twelve-year cumulative survival was 71% (SE 3), freedom from reoperation for SVD 77% (SE 4); younger patient age was associated with increased SVD rates. Actual risk of allograft reoperation was comparable to porcine and pericardial bioprostheses in a simulated age-matched population. CONCLUSIONS: The use of allografts for AVR is associated with low occurrence rates of most valve-related events, but over time the risk of SVD increases, comparable to stented xenografts. It remains in our institute the preferred valve substitute only for patients with active aortic root endocarditis and for patients in whom anticoagulation should be avoided.     

Modern Cardiac Valve Devices— Bioprostheses and Mechanical Prostheses: State of the Art

The choice of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses as valvular substitutes for cardiac valve replacement surgery has existed for over 20 years. The extensive developments over the past three decades have been introduced to reduce or eliminate valve related complications, namely thromboembolism, anticoagulant related hemorrhage, and structural failure, as well as to optimize hemodynamic performance. The biological valvular prostheses, namely porcine aortic or bovine pericardium, have been developed with tissue preservation, together with stent designs, that contribute to preservation of anatomical characteristics and biomechanical properties of the leaflets. The mechanical prostheses have been developed to eliminate structural failure, to facilitate prevention of blood status and thrombus formation, to facilitate radiopacity for evaluation of prosthesis function, and to facilitate intraoperative leaflet positioning. The implantation of the various present generation bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses requires special considerations to avoid technical complications and support ventricular performance. The studies of biological and mechanical prostheses, both randomized and nonrandomized, as well as specific prosthesis assessments, have contributed to the establishment of indications for types of prostheses. Bioprostheses have a high risk of structural failure and reoperation, while mechanical prostheses have a high risk of thromboembolism and anticoagulant hemorrhage. Within the bioprostheses population, the risk factors for structural valve deterioration are younger age and mitral prosthesis. Older patients (> 65 years of age) have a greater risk of valve related complications with mechanical prostheses, while younger patients (< 40 years of age) are at greater risk with bioprostheses. Comparison of large bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses populations by age groups revealed that regardless of the differences in the freedom from structural valve deterioration, the freedom from treatment failure (valve related mortality and permanent impairment from thromboembolism, anticoagulant hemorrhage, and septal emboli from prosthetic valve endocarditis) is essentially the same for mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses at 10 years. The quality of life is superior with bioprostheses, while patient survival and total valve related morbidity/mortality are similar with both types of prostheses.     

The Monostrut Bj?rk-Shiley valve. Seven years' experience.

The results of cardiac valve replacement with the Monostrut Bj?rk-Shiley prosthesis (Shiley, Inc., Irvine, Calif.) during a 7-year period are presented. A total of 984 valves were implanted in 820 patients from May 1983 to April 1990. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 378 patients, mitral replacement in 294, and multiple replacement in 148. In addition, 180 patients (22%) underwent associated procedures. Mean age was 52.6 +/- 11 years. Operative (30 days) mortality was 5.9% (49 patients): 3.9% (15 patients) for aortic, 7.8% (23 patients) for mitral, and 7.4% (11 patients) for multiple valve replacement. All patients were given long-term anticoagulation therapy. Follow-up was 99% complete (eight patients were lost to follow-up), with a closing interval of 3 months, and totaled 2422 patient-years. Valve-related complications, expressed as percentage event-free (+/- standard error) at seven years were as follows: structural deterioration, 100%; nonstructural dysfunction, 98.3% +/- 0.6%; thromboembolism, 90.2% +/- 1.7%; anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, 88.7% +/- 2.8%; and prosthetic valve endocarditis, 98.1% +/- 0.8%. There were no cases of valve thrombosis. Actuarial survival (free from operative, valve-related, and sudden death) was 88.4% +/- 1.2% at 7 years. Freedom from reoperation was 96.8% +/- 0.1%. Probability of being free from all valve-related morbidity and mortality was 70% +/- 3%, and 708 (93%) of the survivors were in New York Heart Association class I or II. Serial Doppler echocardiograms were done prospectively in 243 patients (with 154 aortic and 120 mitral prostheses), both postoperatively and at regular intervals up to 3 years. Mean prosthetic gradients ranged from an average of 20.9 to 7 mm Hg in the aortic prostheses (21 to 29 mm) and from 6.1 to 4.8 mm Hg in the mitral prostheses (25 to 31 mm). The gradients in each patient did not change significantly during the follow-up period. Our 7 year's experience with the Monostrut valve shows a low rate of valve-related complications, a durable design, and good hemodynamic and functional results.     

Heart valve replacement with the Sorin tilting-disc prosthesis. A 10-year experience.

From 1978 to 1988, 697 patients with a mean age of 48 +/- 11 years (range 5 to 75 years) received a Sorin tilting-disc prosthesis; 358 had had aortic valve replacement, 247 mitral valve replacement, and 92 mitral and aortic valve replacement. Operative mortality rates were 7.8%, 11.3%, and 10.8%, respectively, in the three groups. Cumulative duration of follow-up is 1650 patient-years for aortic valve replacement (maximum follow-up 11.4 years), 963 patient-years for mitral valve replacement (maximum follow-up 9.9 years) and 328 patient-years for mitral and aortic valve replacement (maximum follow-up 9.4 years). Actuarial survival at 9 years is 72% +/- 4% after mitral valve replacement, 70% +/- 3% after aortic valve replacement, and 50% +/- 12% after mitral and aortic valve replacement, and actuarial freedom from valve-related deaths is 97% +/- 2% after mitral valve replacement, 92% +/- 2% after aortic valve replacement, and 62% +/- 15% after mitral and aortic valve replacement. Thromboembolic events occurred in 21 patients with aortic valve replacement (1.3% +/- 0.2%/pt-yr), in 12 with mitral valve replacement (1.2% +/- 0.3% pt-yr), and in seven with mitral and aortic valve replacement (2.1% +/- 0.8%), with one case of prosthetic thrombosis in each group; actuarial freedom from thromboembolism at 9 years is 92% +/- 3% after mitral valve replacement, 91% +/- 3% after aortic valve replacement, and 74% +/- 16% after mitral and aortic valve replacement. Anticoagulant-related hemorrhage was observed in 15 patients after aortic valve replacement (0.9% +/- 0.2%/pt-yr), in 9 after mitral valve replacement (0.9% +/- 0.3%/pt-yr), and in 6 with mitral and aortic valve replacement (0.9% +/- 0.5%/pt-yr); actuarial freedom from this complication at 9 years is 94% +/- 2% after aortic valve replacement, 91% +/- 4% after mitral valve replacement, and 68% +/- 16% after mitral and aortic valve replacement. Actuarial freedom from reoperation at 9 years is 97% +/- 2% after mitral and aortic valve replacement, 92% +/- 4% after mitral valve replacement, and 89% +/- 3% after aortic valve replacement, with no cases of mechanical fracture. The Sorin valve has shown a satisfactory long-term overall performance, comparable with other mechanical prostheses, and an excellent durability that renders it a reliable heart valve substitute for the mitral and aortic positions.     

Ten-year analysis of the Bj?rk-Shiley standard aortic valve

Long-term performance characteristics of the Bj?rk-Shiley standard aortic valve were determined by analyzing the follow-up of 514 patients undergoing operation between 1971 and 1981. Cumulative follow-up was 2,601 patient-years (average, 5.3 +/- 3.8 years); 53% (238/452) of hospital survivors have been followed more than 5 years. Valve-related complications expressed as both actuarial event-free percents (+/- standard error at 10 years) and first-event linearized determinations (percent per patient-year) occurred at the following rates: thromboembolism, 82 +/- 3 and 2.3 +/- 0.3, respectively; anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, 60 +/- 4 and 5.6 +/- 0.5; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 94 +/- 2 and 0.8 +/- 0.2; valve thrombosis, 97 +/- 1 and 0.4 +/- 0.1; reoperation, 94 +/- 2 and 0.6 +/- 0.2; valve failure, 82 +/- 4 and 1.6 +/- 0.2; and composite valve-related morbidity and mortality, 46 +/- 4 and 8.8 +/- 0.2. Overall survival was 72 +/- 2% at 5 years and 55 +/- 3% at 10 years; valve-related complications accounted for 22% of the late deaths. Although no instance of structural valve failure could be identified, 25% of valve-related complications resulted from valve failure, of which 67% were fatal. By 10 years, 54% of patients had experienced at least one form of major valve-related complication, 16% of which proved fatal. The Bj?rk-Shiley standard aortic valve has late valve-related complications similar to other existing mechanical prostheses that have been subjected to long-term analysis.     

Porcine cardiac bioprostheses: evaluation of long-term results in 990 patients

Clinical results with porcine bioprostheses were reviewed for 990 patients who underwent heart valve replacement from January, 1974, to December, 1980. Eight hundred and seventy-four Hancock, 283 Carpentier-Edwards, and 10 Liotta bioprostheses were used. In 23 patients, 26 mechanical prostheses were implanted as well. Overall operative mortality was 60 out of 990 (6.06%): 30 out of 506 (5.9%) for mitral valve replacement (MVR), 13 out of 287 (4.5%) for aortic valve replacement (AVR), 1 out of 4 (25%) for tricuspid valve replacement, 0 out of 2 for pulmonary valve replacement, and 16 out of 191 (8.4%) for multiple valve replacement. Cumulative follow-up covered 1,793 patient-years. (Actuarial survival at 7 years was 76.6 +/- 3% for MVR. At 6 years, it was 83.2 +/- 2.8% for AVR and 55 +/- 13.5% for multiple valve replacement.) Prosthesis-related survival at 7 years was 91.7 +/- 1.9% for MVR, and at 6 years, it was 96.6 +/- 1.5% for AVR and 95.1 +/- 2.2% for multiple valve replacement. Bioprosthesis survival, considering deaths or complications that led to reoperation as final events, was 84.2 +/- 3.7% at 7 years for mitral valves and 87.7 +/- 3.8% at 6 years for aortic valves. Emboli per 100 patient-years numbered 3.2 for MVR, 0.5 for AVR, and 1.6 for multiple valve replacement. Twenty-seven patients underwent reoperation, 12 for perivalvular leak, 5 for endocarditis, 6 for valve thrombosis, and 4 for primary tissue failure (linearized rates of 0.7, 0.3, 0.3, and 0.2% per patient-year, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ten-year echocardiographic and clinical follow-up of aortic Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular prosthesis: a case-match study

BACKGROUND: There are little comparative data on Carpentier-Edwards supraannular and pericardial second-generation bioprostheses. The aim of this work was to compare their hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 150 patients operated on for aortic stenosis between 1989 and 1993. Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with either a Carpentier-Edwards supraannular or pericardial prosthesis were matched for sex (49% male), age (72 +/- 8 years), body surface area, valve size, associated procedures, and left ventricular ejection fraction. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 6.5 +/- 3.3 years, giving a total follow-up of 983 patient-years. Thirty-day mortality and 10-year actuarial survival were, respectively, 8% and 51% in the supraannular group and 6.7% and 43.4% in the pericardial group. At 10 years, freedom from thromboembolism, structural failure, and all valve-related events were, respectively, 88.7%, 88.9%, and 68.7% in the supraannular group and 85%, 100%, and 82.2% in the pericardial group. There were four (5.3%) structural failures, and four (5.3%) reoperations for degeneration (n = 3) and endocarditis (n = 1) in the supraannular group. Freedom from structural dysfunction or reoperation was 87.3% in the supraannular group and 100% (p < 0.05) in the pericardial group. Echocardiographic review of 62 of 76 survivors (81.5%) demonstrated a trend toward a better hemodynamic profile of pericardial valves at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Ten years after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, Carpentier-Edwards pericardial prostheses give comparable and probably better results than Carpentier-Edwards supraannular prostheses.     

Results of valve replacement with Omniscience mechanical prostheses

BACKGROUND: The Omniscience mechanical valve has been the subject of multiple clinical investigations with variable results, including reports of high complication and reoperation rates. METHODS: Records of all patients who received Omniscience valves were reviewed, and follow-up interviews were conducted to determine the incidence of valve-related morbidity, mortality, and functional results. Incidence of complications was expressed as events per 100 patient-years follow-up. Survival and freedom from valve-related complications and mortality were calculated using a product limit method. RESULTS: Between 1984 and 1988, 192 patients received 213 Omniscience valves [93 mitral (M), 79 aortic (A), and 20 multiple (D) valve replacements]. Perioperative mortality was 9%. The incidence of major valve-related morbidity was as follows: thrombosis, 1.30 M, 0.17 A, 0.72 D; endocarditis, 0.48 M, 0.18 A, 0 D; hemorrhagic, 4.67 M, 2.84 A, 5.00 D; embolic, 2.90 M, 2.27 A, 1.57 D; nonstructural dysfunction, 1.66 M, 1.08 A, 2.27 D; reoperation, 4.02 M, 1.99 A, 6.48 D. All explanted valves (n = 43) were examined, and 40% (n = 17) were found to have limited disc excursion in the absence of thrombus. Freedom from valve-related morbidity, mortality, or reoperation at 10 years was 22% for mitral, 39% for aortic, and 17% for multivalve replacements. At follow-up, only 73% of patients were New York Heart Association class I or II. Five- and 10-year estimated survivals were 72% and 55% for M, 80% and 51% for A, and 65% and 50% for D replacements. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Omniscience valve provided poor functional improvement and a significant incidence of valve-related complications, including the need for reoperation.     

Choice of a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis for AVR: does CABG matter?

OBJECTIVE: Mechanical valves and bioprostheses are the commonly used devices in aortic valve replacement (AVR). Many patients with valvular disease also require concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We used a microsimulation model to provide insight into the outcomes of patients after AVR with mechanical valves and stented bioprostheses, with and without CABG, and to determine the age-thresholds or age crossover points in outcomes between the two valve types. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of published results after primary AVR with mechanical prostheses (nine reports, 4274 patients, 25,726 patient-years) and stented porcine bioprostheses (13 reports, 9007 patients, 54,151 patient-years) to estimate risks of valve-related events. A hazard ratio of 1.3 was used to incorporate the effect of CABG on long-term survival. Estimates were entered into a microsimulation model, which was then used to predict the outcomes of patients after AVR, with and without CABG. The model calculations were validated using a large data set from Portland, USA. RESULTS: For a 65-year-old male without CABG, the life expectancy (LE) was 11.2 and 11.6 years and the event-free life expectancy (EFLE) was 8.2 and 8.9 years, respectively, after implantation with mechanical valves and bioprostheses. The lifetime risk of at least one valve-related event was 51 and 47%, respectively. The age crossover point between the two valve types, considering the above outcome parameters, was 59, 60 and 63 years, respectively. CABG reduced LE and consequently EFLE and lifetime risk of an event, but only minimally influenced the patient age crossover points. The model calculations showed good agreement with the Portland data. CONCLUSIONS: The currently recommended patient age for using a bioprosthesis (65 years) could be lowered further, irrespective of concomitant CABG. The trade-off between the reduced risks of bioprosthetic failure and of hemorrhage in mechanical valves, resulting from a lower LE, minimized the effect of CABG on the age crossover points between the two valve types.     

Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.

OBJECTIVES: Reoperation is a relatively common event in patients with prosthetic heart valves, but its actual occurrence can vary widely from one patient to another. With a focus on bioprosthetic valves, this study examines risk factors for reoperation in a large patient cohort. METHODS: Patients (N=3233) who underwent a total of 3633 operations for aortic (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) between 1970 and 2002 were prospectively followed (total 21,179 patient-years; mean 6.6+/-5.0 years; maximum 32.4 years). The incidence of prosthetic valve reoperation and the impact of patient- and valve-related variables were determined with actual and actuarial methods. RESULTS: Fifteen-year actual freedom from all-cause reoperation was 94.1% for aortic mechanical valves, 61.4% for aortic bioprosthetic valves, 94.8% for mitral mechanical valves, and 63.3% for mitral bioprosthetic valves. In both aortic and mitral positions, current bioprosthesis models had significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses (15-year reoperation odds-ratio 0.11+/-0.04; P<0.01 for aortic, and 0.42+/-0.14; P=0.009 for mitral). Current bioprostheses were significantly more durable in the aortic position than in the mitral position (14.3+/-6.8% more freedom from 15-year reoperation; (P=0.018)). Older age was protective, but smoking was an independent risk factor for reoperation after bioprosthetic AVR and MVR (hazard ratio for smoking 2.58 and 1.78, respectively). In patients with aortic bioprostheses, persistent left ventricular hypertrophy at follow-up and smaller prosthesis size predicted an increased incidence of reoperation, while this was not observed in patients with mitral bioprostheses. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate that current bioprostheses have significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses, reveal a detrimental impact for smoking after AVR and MVR, and indicate an increased reoperation risk in patients with a small aortic bioprosthesis or with persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after AVR.     

Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: primary tissue failure (structural valve deterioration) by age groups

Primary tissue failure (structural valve deterioration) has been documented as the most prominent complication of porcine bioprostheses. The influence of age on primary tissue failure has received limited consideration. From 1975 to 1986, 1,301 Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprostheses were implanted in 1,183 patients in 1,201 operations. Of the total number of prostheses, 97.7% were implanted prior to 1983. The mean follow-up was 5.6 years and was 97.5% complete. Primary tissue failure was identified in 96 patients (98 operations) at reoperation (95) or autopsy (3). One hundred four (104) prostheses were involved. Thirty-one failed after aortic valve replacement (AVR), 49 after mitral valve replacement (MVR), and 24 after multiple-valve replacement (18 patients). There were 47 male and 49 female patients. The mean age at implantation was 47 years (range, 8 to 72 years). The mean implantation time was 74.0 months. The freedom from primary tissue failure at 10 years is 77.0 +/- 2.9% overall; for AVR, 83.1 +/- 3.7%; for MVR, 72.1 +/- 4.9%; and for multiple-valve replacement, 65.5 +/- 7.8%. The freedom from deterioration for patients less than 20 years of age is significantly less than that for other age groups. The freedom from deterioration increased by decades; the greatest freedom was noted in patients 70 to 80 years old and 80 years old or older. The freedom from deterioration at 10 years for patients less than 30 years of age is 26.8 +/- 17.2%; 30 to 59 years, 77.4 +/- 3.0%; and 60 years and older, 83.1 +/- 4.2%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Midterm evaluation of the Tissuemed (Aspire) porcine bioprosthesis: 493 patients, 506 bioprostheses

BACKGROUND: Valve durability has been a major concern with bioprostheses, and the Tissuemed (Aspire) porcine bioprosthesis was designed to provide a solution to structural valve failure. Because bioprostheses tend to fail by 8 years, the aim of our study was to determine its midterm durability and performance. METHODS: We reviewed 506 prostheses that were implanted in 493 patients (287 men; mean age 73 +/- 6 years) between 1991 and 1999. Preoperatively 316 (68%) patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. There were 417 (85%) aortic, 61 (12%) mitral, 13 (2.6%) aortic and mitral, and two (0.4%) tricuspid procedures. Concomitant procedures were performed in 163 (33%) patients. Follow-up was complete in 488 (98.9%) patients with a total cumulative follow-up of 1,402 patient-years. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality in this elderly population was 10% (95% confidence interval, 8 to 13), with no early valve-related deaths. Patients' survival at 8 years was 46% +/- 7%. This was influenced by the following factors: (1) the patient's age, being worse for those 70 years or older (p = 0.005); (2) those in New York Heart Association functional class III and IV (p = 0.004); (3) those in atrial fibrillation before the operation (p = 0.006); (4) those with poor left ventricular function (p = 0.009); and (5) those who had a previous cardiac operation (p = 0.003). Valve-related complications (expressed as percent per patient-year) were thromboembolism at 0.9%/patient-year; major hemorrhage at 1.4%/patient-year; bacterial endocarditis at 0.4%/patient-year; nonstructural dysfunction at 0.2%/patient-year, and reoperation at 0.2%/patient-year. At 8 years, freedom from thromboembolism was 93% +/- 7%, major hemorrhage, 90% +/- 4%, nonstructural dysfunction, 99% +/- 1%, structural valve failure, 100%, and reoperation, 99% +/- 1%. At follow-up, 98% of survivors were in New York Heart Association class I or II. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that at 8 years, the Tissuemed (Aspire) porcine bioprosthesis is durable and has satisfactory performance with low complication rates.     

Long-term results of porcine bioprosthetic valves

Between November 1977 and October 1980, 54 patients underwent valve replacements with porcine bioprostheses at Hyogo Kenritsu Amagasaki Hospital. The late complications and the long term durability of 53 porcine bioprostheses were documented in 48 patients after discharge (34 mitral, 7 aortic, 2 tricuspid, and 5 multiple, consisting of 38 Hancock, 15 Carpentier-Edwards prostheses). Cumulative duration of follow-up is 420 patient-years. The valve related late mortality was 0.52%/patient-years. There were 6 thromboembolic events (1.6% patient-years), only 1 episode of endocarditis (0.26%/patient-years). Valve dysfunction is defined as stenosis or regurgitation by echocardiogram or cardiac catheterization. There were 21 instances of porcine bioprosthetic dysfunction (6.6% patient-years). Freedom from valve dysfunction at 12 years was 24.4%. There were 17 valves of mitral bioprosthetic dysfunction (6.4% patient-years). The incidences of mitral stenosis (MS), mitral regurgitation (MR), and paravalvular leakage were 4.5, 3.6, and 0.7%/patient-years respectively. Freedom from MR was higher than MS at 8 years. The 14 patients were needed reoperation due to valve dysfunction (3.6%/patient-years). We concluded that the porcine bioprostheses showed a high incidence of valve dysfunction at 7 to 8 years after operation, we presently choose mechanical valve in most cases.     

More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan.

From February 1975 through October 1981, 256 Hancock porcine bioprostheses (Johnson & Johnson Cardiovascular, King of Prussia, Pa.) (60 aortic, 169 mitral, and 27 pulmonary/tricuspid position) were implanted in 220 patients (104 male and 116 female, aged 9 to 67 years; mean 43.3) at Kyushu University Hospital in Japan. The procedures include 41 aortic valve replacements, 121 mitral valve replacements, 4 pulmonary valve replacements, 6 tricuspid valve replacements, and 48 combined valve replacements (31 aortic plus mitral, 13 mitral plus tricuspid, and 4 aortic plus mitral plus tricuspid). Hospital mortality was 6.4%. Follow-up was 98% during 8 to 14 (mean 10.5) years. Cumulative follow-up was 1836 patient-years and 2078 valve-years. At 10 years the overall actuarial survival rate, including hospital morality, was 70% +/- 3%, and freedom from valve-related mortality with sudden death was 87% +/- 3%. More than half of the current survivors required no anticoagulant therapy. Freedom from thromboembolism or anticoagulant-related hemorrhage (or both) and prosthetic valve endocarditis was common. Freedom from structural valve failure and reoperation declined more than 9 years after replacement of left-sided heart valves but not after replacement of right-sided heart valves. Sixty-seven patients underwent 68 repeat operations, and there were four deaths (5.9%). The rate of freedom from overall valve-related complications at 10 years was 62% +/- 8% for aortic valve replacement, 53% +/- 5% for mitral valve replacement, 80% +/- 13% for pulmonary/tricuspid valve replacement, and 42% +/- 9% for combined valve replacement. There was a significant difference between pulmonary/tricuspid valve replacement and combined valve replacement (p less than 0.05). The Hancock bioprosthesis is suitable for the replacement of valves in the right side of the heart but not for combined valve replacement.     

Valve replacement in the elderly. Is the mechanical valve a good alternative?

The controversy surrounding the choice of a prosthesis for valve replacement in the elderly patient prompted me to review the performance of mechanical (Medtronic Hall [Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.] and St. Jude Medical [St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.]) valves implanted in 213 patients 65 years and older (mean 70.4 years) from 1980 to 1985. There were 63 mitral, 131 aortic, and 19 double (aortic and mitral) valve replacements. Most patients undergoing aortic valve replacement had stenotic lesions, but half of the patients in the mitral valve replacement group had regurgitation with or without stenosis. Early mortality rates for mitral, aortic, and double valve replacement were 4.8%, 6.1%, and 21.1%, respectively (p less than 0.01). The mortality rate for patients 65 to 74 years old was 6.5% and that for those older than 75 years was 9.1%. The cumulative follow-up for the survivors was 850 patient-years. The late mortality rate was 8.1% per patient-year but was valve-related in only 1.3% per patient-year. Noncardiac causes accounted for 43.5% of the late deaths. The late mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who had regurgitant lesions than in those who had stenotic or mixed disease. It was also higher in the older patients (10.3% per patient-year) than in the younger group (7.6% per patient-year; p less than 0.05). Reoperation was required in only six patients (0.7% per patient-year). Thrombotic obstruction of the prosthesis and systemic thromboembolism occurred at linearized rates of 0.6% per patient-year and 2.5% per patient year, respectively, and significant anticoagulant-related hemorrhage at a rate of 0.6% per patient-year. With the exception of late mortality, the incidence of all late complications was similar to that of patients younger than 65 years operated on during the same period. Actuarially, global survival (58% +/- 4%) and freedom from reoperation (95% +/- 2%), from thrombotic obstruction (96% +/- 1%), from thromboembolism (92% +/- 2%), from all valve-related mortality and morbidity (82% +/- 3%), and from valve failure (93% +/- 2%) were also similar to those of the younger patients. Mechanical prostheses perform well in elderly patients. I could not confirm an increase in thromboembolic or hemorrhagic episodes, and the respective mortality and morbidity indexes were similar to those observed in younger patients.