Deramciclane in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-finding study

Deramciclane, a camphor derivative, is a novel anxiolytic agent with a unique mechanism of action. It acts as a potent and specific antagonist at serotonin 5-HT_2A/2C receptors, and exhibits anxiolytic efficacy in animal models. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a range of doses of deramciclane in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Adult patients with a diagnosis of GAD (DSM-IV) and a Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total score ≥ 18; a score ≥ 2 for the HAM-A items ‘Anxious Mood’ and ‘Tension’; a score ≥ 4 on the Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale; and a score ≤ 20 on the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were enrolled in the study. Following a 1–2 week placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to receive deramciclane (10, 30, or 60 mg/day in two divided doses) or placebo for 8 weeks, followed by a 2-week placebo wash-out period. The primary efficacy measure was change in HAM-A score from baseline to week 8. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Withdrawal reactions were assessed at the end of the study (week 8) and during the placebo wash-out period using the Physician's Withdrawal Checklist (34 items). In the intent-to-treat population (n = 208), both the deramciclane 30 mg/day and 60 mg/day doses provided clinically relevant improvements in HAM-A total score after 8 weeks of treatment, reaching statistical significance compared with placebo in the 60 mg/day dose group (p = 0.024) and a clear trend in the 30 mg/day group (p = 0.059). On the HAM-A psychic anxiety factor, significant improvements were seen in patients in the deramciclane 30 mg/day and 60 mg/day treatment groups compared with those in the placebo group (p < 0.05). Adverse events were reported at a similar frequency across all four treatment groups; the most commonly reported adverse event was headache. No withdrawal reactions were observed on abrupt discontinuation of deramciclane. In conclusion, deramciclane 60 mg/day showed significant evidence of efficacy for the treatment of GAD in adult patients. The efficacy for the 30 mg/day dose was close to the larger dose although not significant in the primary analysis, and there was no significant evidence of efficacy for the 10 mg/day dose. Deramciclane was safe and well-tolerated up to the 60 mg/day dose over an 8-week period.     

Extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy as maintenance treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: a long-term, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) as maintenance monotherapy for patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Time-to-event (anxiety symptom recurrence; maximum 52 weeks) multicenter, randomized-withdrawal, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine XR (50-300 mg/day) following open-label run-in (4-8 weeks) and open-label stabilization (≥ 12 weeks). Primary variable: time from randomization to anxiety event. Secondary variables included: Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total, HAM-A psychic/somatic anxiety factors, Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S), and Quality of Life, Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) scores; adverse events (AE) reporting. Four hundred and thirty-two patients, stabilized on quetiapine XR, were randomized to continue quetiapine XR (N=216) or switch to placebo (N=216). Risk of anxiety symptom recurrence was significantly reduced by 81% for quetiapine XR versus placebo: hazard ratio=0.19 (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.31; P<0.001). Fewer patients receiving quetiapine XR (N=22, 10.2%) than placebo (N=84, 38.9%) experienced anxiety symptom recurrence. Significant differences were observed between quetiapine XR and placebo in: HAM-A total, psychic/somatic, CGI-S (all P<0.001) and Q-LES-Q (P<0.05) scores. AEs (>10%) during open-label treatment were dry mouth, sedation, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, and constipation. During randomized treatment, the most common AEs for quetiapine XR were headache and nasopharyngitis. Quetiapine XR monotherapy reduced the risk of anxiety symptom recurrence in patients with GAD stabilized on quetiapine XR, with tolerability results consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.     

Tiagabine in adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder: results from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies

The objective of these studies was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of tiagabine, a selective gamma-aminobutyric acid reuptake inhibitor, in adult patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Patients with a diagnosis of GAD were enrolled in 1 of 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, 10-week studies. In each study, tiagabine was taken twice daily in divided doses--4, 8, or 12 mg/d in a fixed-dose study and 4-16 mg/d in two flexible-dose trials. The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline in the 14-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) total score at the final visit (last observation carried forward). Additional measures included change from baseline in the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Sheehan Disability Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale. Tolerability was assessed via spontaneous reports as well as rating scales throughout the study period. In all 3 studies, there was no significant differentiation from placebo on the primary measure (change in HAM-A) for any tiagabine dose (P > 0.05). In the 2 flexible-dose studies, the tiagabine group showed improvements over time in the HAM-A that reached significance only in those patients who completed 10 weeks of treatment (study 2, P = 0.018; study 3, P = 0.036). The most common adverse events were dizziness, headache, nausea, fatigue, and somnolence. In conclusion, the results of these studies do not support the efficacy of tiagabine in adult patients with GAD.     

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) 5 mg in generalized anxiety disorder: Results of an 8-week randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled clinical trial in the United States

The goal of the current clinical study, conducted in the United States (US), was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine 5 mg vs placebo in adults with a primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; HAM-A total score ≥20 and MADRS score ≤16). Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive vortioxetine 5 mg (n=152) or placebo (n=152) for 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed using change from baseline in HAM-A total scores after 8 weeks of treatment compared with placebo, using mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) analyses. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study. A total of 304 subjects were randomized (mean age, 41.2 years). After 8 weeks of treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the reduction in HAM-A total score from baseline between the Vortioxetine (n=145) and placebo (n=145) groups. There were no statistically significant differences in any key secondary efficacy outcome between vortioxetine and placebo. Factors potentially contributing to the differences between the results of this study and those of one of identical design conducted outside the US are discussed. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were nausea, headache, dizziness, and dry mouth. Nausea was more frequently reported in the vortioxetine group (25% vs 4.6% for the placebo group). Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity. In conclusion, in this trial, vortioxetine did not improve symptoms of GAD (compared with placebo) over 8 weeks of treatment. Vortioxetine was well tolerated in this study.     

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in generalized anxiety disorder: Results of an 8-week,multinational, randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled clinical trial

Vortioxetine is a multimodal antidepressant, with anxiolytic properties observed in preclinical studies. The goal of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine 5 mg vs placebo in adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Adults with a primary diagnosis of GAD (HAM-A total score ≥20 and MADRS score ≤16) received vortioxetine 5 mg or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was reduction in HAM-A total scores from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment compared with placebo. Key secondary measurements were HAD anxiety subscore, CGI-I, SDS total score, HAM-A response rates, HAM-A total score for subjects whose baseline HAM-A total score was ≥25, and SF-36 social functioning subscore. HAM-A remission rates were also measured. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed throughout the study. In total, 301 subjects (mean age, 45.2 years; 31% male) were randomized (1:1) to receive vortioxetine 5 mg (n=150) or placebo (n=151). After 8 weeks of treatment, there was a statistically significant difference in reduction from baseline in HAM-A total score for the vortioxetine group (?14.30) compared with placebo recipients (?10.49) (P<0.001). Statistically significant differences were observed for all key secondary outcomes favoring vortioxetine treatment (vs placebo), using a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) analysis. Active treatment resulted in a significantly higher rate of remission. Vortioxetine was well tolerated. The most common treatment-related AEs were nausea, headache, dizziness, and dry mouth. In sum, vortioxetine was safe and effective in treating adults with GAD in this multinational population.     

A comparative study of alpidem, a nonbenzodiazepine, and lorazepam in patients with nonpsychotic anxiety.

The use of benzodiazepines for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a safe and effective treatment; however, their potential to produce dependence and impair psychomotor and cognitive functions is a drawback. In this study the efficacy and safety of alpidem, a nonbenzodiazepine, was assessed. Thirty patients who met DSM-III-R criteria for GAD were randomized to either alpidem (225 mg), lorazepam (4.5 mg), or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to determine differences in HAM-A scores over time. The results showed a trend for alpidem to be more effective. Half of the alpidem group had a decrease of 50 percent or greater in their HAM-A scores with an almost equal effect on psychic and somatic symptoms. The most common side effects with alpidem and lorazepam were lightheadedness, drowsiness, and daytime tiredness. Moreover, treatment with alpidem did not manifest any withdrawal symptoms. Thus nonbenzodiazepine treatments are effective and safe for GAD.     

Adjunctive therapy with pregabalin in generalized anxiety disorder patients with partial response to SSRI or SNRI treatment

This study evaluated the efficacy of adjunctive pregabalin versus placebo for treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) who had not optimally responded to previous or prospective monotherapies. This was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients diagnosed with GAD who had a historical and current lack of response to pharmacotherapy [Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) of ≥ 22 at screening] were randomized to adjunctive treatment with either pregabalin (150-600 mg/day) or placebo. The primary outcome measure was the change in HAM-A total scores after 8 weeks of combination treatment. Adverse events were regularly monitored. Randomized patients (N=356) were treated with pregabalin (n=180) or placebo (n=176). Mean baseline HAM-A scores were 20.7 and 21.4, respectively. After treatment, the mean change in HAM-A was significantly greater for pregabalin compared with placebo (-7.6 vs. -6.4, respectively; P<0.05). HAM-A responder rates (≥ 50% reduction) were significantly higher for pregabalin (47.5%) versus placebo (35.2%; P=0.0145). The time-to-sustained response favored pregabalin over placebo (P=0.014). Adverse events were consistent with previous studies and discontinuations were infrequent for pregabalin (4.4%) and placebo (2.3%). The study was discontinued early after an interim analysis. The results indicate that adjunctive pregabalin is an efficacious therapy for patients with GAD who experience an inadequate response to established treatments.     

Estazolam treatment of insomnia in generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled study

Estazolam, a triazolobenzodiazepine with an intermediate elimination half-life, has been shown previously to be an effective and safe hypnotic in insomniacs without concomitant psychiatric illness. Our study of the efficacy of estazolam in patients with insomnia associated with generalized anxiety disorder began when 108 patients meeting criteria for generalized anxiety disorder (mean total score of Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety [HAM-A] = 22.0 +/- 3.1 [SD]) and insomnia were given single-blind placebo for 7 nights. Nine patients whose anxiety and/or insomnia improved were dropped as placebo responders. The remaining 99 patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to double-blind treatment with either estazolam 2.0 mg or matching placebo for 7 nights. Hypnotic efficacy, as determined by patient-completed sleep questionnaires, was statistically significant for estazolam 2.0 mg versus placebo for all sleep indices (p less than 0.01). Patients treated with estazolam 2.0 mg showed significantly greater improvement in anxiety than those receiving placebo on the mean total score of HAM-A ([placebo, -3.4; estazolam, -7.1; p less than 0.001] and without the insomnia item [placebo, -2.7; estazolam, -5.5; p less than 0.001]). Anxiety scores on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory showed greater improvement in the estazolam group, but without statistical significance (p = 0.237). Estazolam 2.0 mg is an effective hypnotic in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and appears to have a favorable anxiolytic action.     

Efficacy of pregabalin in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of BID versus TID dosing

Pregabalin is a new anxiolytic that acts as a presynaptic inhibitor of the release of excessive levels of excitatory neurotransmitters by selectively binding to the alpha2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. The current study evaluated the anxiolytic efficacy of BID versus TID dosing of pregabalin in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Outpatients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition generalized anxiety disorder and having baseline Hamilton Anxiety (HAM-A) total scores > or =20 were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with pregabalin 200 mg/d (BID; N = 78), 400 mg/d (BID; N = 89), or 450 mg/d (TID; N = 88) or placebo (N = 86). Mean improvement in HAM-A total score at last observation carried forward end point was significantly greater on pregabalin 200 (P = 0.006), 400 (P = 0.001), and 450 mg/d (P = 0.005) compared with placebo. Pairwise comparisons of BID versus TID dosing found no difference in HAM-A change score at end point. All 3 pregabalin dosage groups showed significantly greater efficacy versus placebo at end point on the HAM-A psychic and somatic anxiety factor scores. Improvement on both factors was rapid: significance versus placebo was achieved as early as the first assessment at week 1, with > or =30% reduction in HAM-A severity and equal or greater improvement for every subsequent visit in > or =38% of patients in all 3 pregabalin dosage groups (P < or = 0.001). Pregabalin was well tolerated, and despite the fixed-dose study design, discontinuations caused by adverse events ranged from 9% to 13%--comparable with that observed with placebo (8%). This study demonstrates that pregabalin is an effective treatment of generalized anxiety disorder, with BID dosing showing similar efficacy and comparable tolerability with TID dosing.     

A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled,fixed-dose,multicenter study of pregabalin in patients with generalized anxiety disorder

Pregabalin is a novel compound under development for the treatment of several types of anxiety disorders. To obtain an initial evaluation of the efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), we conducted a double-blind, fixed-dose, parallel-group, placebo and active-controlled multicenter 4-week study that compared 271 patients randomized to receive pregabalin 50 mg tid (N = 70), pregabalin 200 mg tid (N = 66), placebo (N = 67), or lorazepam 2 mg tid (N = 68), followed by a 1-week double-blind taper. The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline to endpoint (last observation carried forward) in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) total score; adjusted mean change scores on the HAM-A were significantly improved for pregabalin 200 mg tid (difference of 3.90 between drug and placebo; p = 0.0013 [ANCOVA], df = 252) and for lorazepam (difference of 2.35; p = 0.0483 [ANCOVA], df = 252), with the significant difference between the pregabalin 200 mg tid and placebo groups seen at week 1 of treatment (p = 0.0001 [ANCOVA], df = 238). Safety analysis, which included assessment of spontaneously reported adverse events, laboratory monitoring, and withdrawal symptoms, showed pregabalin to be generally well-tolerated. The most common adverse events seen with pregabalin 200 mg tid were somnolence and dizziness. They were usually mild or moderate in intensity and were often transient. Pregabalin-treated patients had a higher completion rate than lorazepam-treated patients. This study supports the hypothesis that pregabalin is effective and safe in short-term therapy for GAD. More studies are needed to determine the best dosing regimen to optimize efficacy and tolerability.     

Eight-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR was assessed and compared with placebo in adult outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Adults meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD with a minimum Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) 17-Item total score of > or =18 were randomized to eight weeks of double-blind treatment with either bupropion XR (150 mg/day), venlafaxine XR (75 mg/day) or placebo. At the end of the fourth week of treatment, a dosage increase to bupropion XR 300 mg/day or venlafaxine XR 150 mg/day was allowed if, in the opinion of the investigator, response was inadequate. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline at week 8 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score last observation carried forward (LOCF). Mean changes from baseline at week 8 (LOCF) in MADRS total score were statistically significant for bupropion XR and venlafaxine XR patients compared to the placebo group: -16.0 for bupropion XR (P = 0.006 vs placebo), -17.1 for venlafaxine XR (P < 0.001 vs placebo) and -13.5 for placebo. Secondary outcomes (including CGI-S, HAM-A, MEI, Q-LES-Q-SF, responder and remitter analyses) also improved significantly for both active treatment groups compared with placebo. The most frequently reported adverse events were dry mouth and insomnia for bupropion XR, and nausea, hyperhidrosis, fatigue, and insomnia for venlafaxine XR. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, bupropion XR at doses up to 300 mg/day and venlafaxine XR at doses up to 150 mg/day demonstrated comparable antidepressant efficacy.     

Effects of PRX-00023, a novel, selective serotonin 1A receptor agonist on measures of anxiety and depression in generalized anxiety disorder: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

PRX-00023, a serotonin 1A receptor agonist, was designed to provide high potency and selectivity for its target. To assess the possible therapeutic utility in anxiety, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 311 subjects who met the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, for generalized anxiety disorder. All subjects underwent a 1-week placebo run-in and were randomized to receive once-daily capsules containing either PRX-00023 (80 mg/d) or placebo for an additional 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A). The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale was used as a secondary endpoint to measure depressive symptoms. Statistical testing was performed with analysis of covariance, between baseline and week 8, with baseline values as a covariate. The anxiolytic effect of PRX-00023, compared with placebo, showed trends across all anxiolytic measures but failed to reach significance on the primary endpoint (HAM-A total score). Among the components of the HAM-A total score, the anxious mood item was significantly different from placebo in the PRX-00023-treated group (-1.015 vs -0.748; P = 0.02). The scores of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale were significantly improved compared with placebo at week 8 (-4.5 vs -1.6; P = 0.0094 in the last observation carried forward analysis). PRX-00023 was well tolerated; of note, there were no drug-related serious adverse events, and more patients discontinued due to adverse events in the placebo group (2.9%) than in the PRX-00023 group (1.4%). The most common adverse event was headache, observed in 15.7% and 10.9% of PRX-00023- and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Furthermore, there was no evidence of impaired sexual function, as measured by the Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Function Scale. Collectively, these results support further clinical investigation of higher doses of PRX-00023 in anxiety and depression.     

Mirtazapine treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a fixed dose, open label study

We investigated the efficacy of mirtazapine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Forty-four adult outpatients with GAD were treated openly with a fixed dose of mirtazapine (30 mg) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in total score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). The Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) was rated at the endpoint. Patients with a reduction of 50% or more on the HAM-A total score and a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 at endpoint were considered responders to treatment; remission was defined as a HAM-A score 相似文献   

Efficacy of pregabalin and venlafaxine-XR in generalized anxiety disorder: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled 8-week trial

The objective of this study was to evaluate the anxiolytic efficacy, and speed of onset of efficacy, of pregabalin (PGB) and venlafaxine-XR (VXR) in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). In this double-blind trial, outpatients, ages 18-65 years, who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, criteria for GAD were randomized to 8 weeks of flexible-dose treatment with PGB (300-600 mg/day), VXR (75-225 mg/day), or placebo (PBO). The intent-to-treat sample consisted of 121 patients on PGB [least square (LS) mean ± SE baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), 27.6 ± 0.4], 125 patients on VXR (baseline HAM-A, 27.4 ± 0.4), and 128 patients on PBO (baseline HAM-A, 26.8 ± 0.4). Treatment with PGB was associated with a significantly greater LS mean change in the HAM-A total score at last observation carried forward endpoint versus PBO (-14.5 ± 0.9 vs. -11.7 ± 0.9; P = 0.028). Treatment with VXR was not significant versus PBO at endpoint (-12.0 ± 0.9; -11.7 ± 0.9; P =0.968). Treatment with PGB showed an early onset of improvement, with significantly greater LS mean change in the HAM-A by day 4 versus both PBO (-5.3 ± 0.5 vs. -3.4± 0.5; P = 0.008) and VXR (-2.9 ± 0.5; P = 0.0012). The proportion of patients reporting a severe adverse event was similar for PGB (9.1%) and PBO (7.8%), but higher for VXR (20.0%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, PGB was a safe and effective treatment of GAD, with a significantly earlier onset of anxiolytic activity than VXR.     

Remission rates with venlafaxine extended release in Greek outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder. A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study

The primary endpoints in this study were the remission rates [final Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) total score < or =7] and reduction from baseline in the HAM-A total score in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and no associated depression. Patients with GAD (DSM-IV and HAM-A total score >18) were randomly assigned to treatment with venlafaxine XR or placebo for 8 weeks. A 1-week placebo run-in period preceded the double-blind phase. Patients with a >20% drop in their total HAM-A score during the run-in period, were excluded from the double-blind phase. All patients started therapy with 75 mg/day venlafaxine XR or matched placebo. Patients with less than 30% decrease in their HAM-A total score at the end of the second week, doubled their dose. Patients on the 150 mg/day dose underwent a 1-week taper period. Of the 24 patients in the venlafaxine XR group, 62.5% achieved remission versus 9.1% in the placebo group (P=0.0006). The mean decrease from baseline in HAM-A total score was 19.2 points for the venlafaxine XR group and 10.8 points for the placebo group (P<0.001). Eleven placebo-treated patients and seven venlafaxine XR treated patients doubled their dose at the end of the second week of double-blind treatment. No patient interrupted therapy because of side-effects. No changes in systolic or diastolic blood pressure were observed. Venlafaxine XR 75-150 mg/day was well tolerated. The remission rates achieved with venlafaxine 75-150 mg/day in non-depressed GAD patients were high with good tolerability.     

Efficacy and tolerability of extended release quetiapine fumarate monotherapy in the acute treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized, placebo controlled and active-controlled study

The main objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) monotherapy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). This was a 8 week randomized, 2-week follow-up, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and active-controlled study. Patients were randomized to quetiapine XR 150 (n=219) or 300 mg/day (n=207); escitalopram, 10 mg/day (n=213); or placebo (n=215). The primary endpoint was the change from randomization at week 8 in Hamilton Anxiety Rating (HAM-A) total score. Week 8 mean HAM-A total score was significantly reduced from randomization with quetiapine XR 150 mg/day (-13.9, P<0.001), 300 mg/day (-12.3, P<0.05) and escitalopram (-12.3, P<0.05) versus placebo (-10.7); significant improvements with quetiapine XR (150 and 300 mg/day) versus placebo (P<0.001) were also shown at day 4. At week 8, significant improvements versus placebo were observed in HAM-A psychic [quetiapine XR (both doses) and escitalopram] and somatic (quetiapine XR 150 mg/day and escitalopram) cluster scores and HAM-A response and remission rates (quetiapine XR 150 mg/day). Most common adverse events were dry mouth, somnolence and sedation (quetiapine XR), headache, and nausea (escitalopram). In patients with GAD, quetiapine XR (150 and 300 mg/day) demonstrated significant efficacy at week 8 with symptom improvement as early as day 4. We concluded that quetiapine XR safety and tolerability results were consistent with the known profile of quetiapine.     

Escitalopram in the treatment of multisomatoform disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Despite the prevalence of multisomatoform disorder (MSD), there are few controlled trials of its pharmacotherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) with that of placebo in treating patients with MSD over a 12-week period. Fifty-one outpatients aged from 18 to 65 years, with multiple medically unexplained symptoms, were recruited. The primary efficacy measure was a change on the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 scores from baseline to endpoint. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score, the psychic and somatic subscales of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Visual Analogue Pain Rating Scale, the Scale for the Assessment of Illness Behaviour and the Sheehan Disability Scale. On the primary analysis of covariance, escitalopram-treated patients had significantly greater reductions in Patient Health Questionnaire scores (P<0.0001) compared with placebo at week 12. Significant separation from placebo occurred from week 6 onwards. Escitalopram was superior to placebo on all secondary outcome endpoints, with the exception of the Scale for the Assessment of Illness Behaviour. The medication was well tolerated. In conclusion, in this 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study, escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) was both effective and well tolerated in the treatment of patients with MSD. Compared with placebo, escitalopram was associated with lower symptom scores, increased response and remission rates, and improved functioning.     

Alpidem and lorazepam in the treatment of patients with anxiety disorders: Comparison of efficacy and rebound

Alpidem, a novel imidazo-pyridine anxiolytic, was compared with lorazepam for efficacy and withdrawal effects in 23 (17 male) anxious psychiatric out-patients of mean age 35.3 years with a mean Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total score of 26.4. Treatment was double blind for 4 weeks with doses built up to a mean of 112.5 mg alpidem and 3.5 mg lorazepam per day. Assessment were made for a further 2 weeks after abrupt withdrawal. There were no differences in scores between the groups before treatment. The HAM-A, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Sleep Rating Scale and other measures showed both drugs to be equally effective for psychic and somatic anxiety, depression and insomnia. Despite the small numbers, lorazepam produced greater improvement in the anxious mood, fear and insomnia items of the HAM-A. After stopping treatment serious rebound in mood and somatic scores was experienced by the lorazepam group in contrast to those patients on alpidem who maintained their improvement. Neither group was troubled by side effects; dropouts were few and due to inefficacy (1 alpidem) or withdrawal problems (2 lorazepam). Alpidem seemed to offer effective anxiolysis without the risk of rebound associated with lorazepam use.     

Long-term comparison of alprazolam, lorazepam and placebo in patients with an anxiety disorder

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 200 patients with moderate to moderately severe anxiety we compared the anxiolytic efficacy and safety of alprazolam and lorazepam. Dosing was flexible and ranged from 1 to 4.5 mg/day of alprazolam and from 2 to 9 mg/day of lorazepam. The mean daily dose at the end of the 16 week study was alprazolam 3.3 mg and lorazepam 5.1 mg. Both active drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in relieving the symptoms of anxiety on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, with a trend toward more improvement in the alprazolam group in the later weeks of the study. Target Symptoms, Physician's and Patient's Global Impressions and the Self Rating Symptom Scale indicate that alprazolam and lorazepam were superior to placebo. The major side effects were sedation and drowsiness; the frequency was similar for alprazolam and lorazepam and twice as high for active drug as placebo. An overall rating of side effect severity was not significantly different among the three groups.     

Extended Release Quetiapine Fumarate (Quetiapine XR) as Adjunct Therapy in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and a History of Inadequate Treatment Response: A Randomized,Double-Blind Study

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adjunct extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and inadequate response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/ serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRI/SNRIs).

Methods

11-week (1-week single-blind placebo run-in; 8-week randomized treatment; 2-week post-treatment period), double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to quetiapine XR or placebo adjunct to SSRI/SNRI. 50 mg initial dose; 150 mg/day, Day 3; 300 mg/day, Weeks × and 4 if indicated (Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness [CGI-S] ≥ 4; 150 mg/day tolerated). Primary endpoint: change from randomization to Week 8 in HAM-A total score. Secondary variables: Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) psychic/somatic clusters, response and remission; and CGI-S.

Results

409 patients were randomized to quetiapine XR (n = 209) or placebo (n = 200); 41% and 55% of patients, respectively, had dose increases (300 mg/day). Week 8 mean change in HAM-A total score was not statistically significant for quetiapine XR (–10.74; p = 0.079) versus placebo (–9.61). Secondary variables were generally consistent with the primary analysis, except a significant reduction in HAM-A total score at Week 1 (–6.45, quetiapine XR versus –4.47, placebo; p < 0.001); significant improvements in HAM-A psychic cluster (p < 0.05) and CGI-S total (p < 0.05) scores at Week 8. Adverse events (.10% either group) were dry mouth, somnolence, sedation, headache, and dizziness.

Conclusions

In patients with GAD and inadequate response to SSRI/SNRI, adjunct quetiapine XR did not show a statistically significant effect for the primary endpoint at Week 8, although some secondary endpoints were statistically significant versus placebo. Quetiapine XR was generally well tolerated.