Consultation-liaison psychiatry: an international perspective.

Consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry is the specialty of physical/psychiatric comorbidity and somatization. As such, it addresses the commonest forms of psychiatric presentation in the community; it is mainstream psychiatry. Its name reflects the fact that most of the patients seen by C-L psychiatrists have to be managed jointly with a non-psychiatrist doctor and other professionals. Because of this, the degree of development of the specialty and its mode of operation differ from country to country, depending on the organization of health services and the varying attitudes towards the disorders in which C-L psychiatry specializes. These differences permit a refreshing opportunity to re-examine the ways in which patients with physical/psychiatric comorbidity and somatization can be helped. The International Organization for Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry was formed to facilitate this process. It has identified challenges that are universal, and which if not met rapidly and efficiently will damage our ability to provide appropriate care for the patients whom we serve.     

Psychiatry and the resource-based relative value scale

Attention to reform of reimbursement for psychiatric inpatient services largely focuses on the use of prospective payment systems, e.g., payment based on diagnosis-related groups (DGRs), for hospitals. Recently, there also has been interest in proposals for altering physician reimbursement (inpatient and outpatient) by using physician DRGs, capitation models, or relative value scales instead of the charge-based, fee-for-service model. The authors review the resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) as an option for psychiatry. The RBRVS uses the setting, the time spent, the difficulty in treating the patient, the training, and the psychiatrist's role to determine reimbursement rates.     

Diagnosis-related groups and general hospital psychiatry: the APA Study

Psychiatric units in general hospitals are exempt from diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), a system of per case prospective payment that is used for the majority of patients covered by Medicare. The American Psychiatric Association purchased a large hospital discharge data base and studied the potential impact of DRGs on psychiatric patients and inpatient psychiatric units in general hospitals. There was substantial inaccuracy in the psychiatric DRGs' prediction of resource use, which could lead to inappropriate discharge of patients and financial risk to hospitals that treat more severe cases. The authors advocate further research because psychiatry must anticipate prospective payment in the future.     

The future of consultation-liaison psychiatry

OBJECTIVE: To review the status of consultation-liaison psychiatry and the factors shaping it, and suggest strategies for its future development. METHOD: In addition to searches of the main computerized psychiatric databases and review of relevant Commonwealth of Australia publications, the author drew on discussions with national and international colleagues in his role as convenor of the International Organization for Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. RESULTS: Physical/psychiatric comorbidity and somatization, the conditions in which consultation-liaison psychiatry specializes, are the commonest forms of psychiatric presentation in the community. They are as disabling as psychotic disorders, and comorbid depression in particular is a predictor of increased morbidity and mortality. Acknowledging this, the Second Australian National Mental Health Plan called for consultation-liaison psychiatry to be allowed to participate fully in the mental health care system. It stated that failure to define the term 'severe mental health problems and mental disorders' in the First Plan had led to some public mental health systems erroneously equating severity with diagnosis rather than level of need and disability. The call has been largely unheeded. The implication for patient care is both direct and indirect; the context created for psychiatry training by such a restricted focus is helping to perpetuate the neglect of such patients. This is a worldwide problem. CONCLUSIONS: Proactive involvement with consumers is required if the problem is to be redressed. At a service level, development of a seamless web of pre-admission/admission/post-discharge functions is required if patients with physical/psychiatric comorbidity and somatoform disorders are to receive effective care, and consultation-liaison psychiatry services are to be able to demonstrate efficacy. Focus on comorbidity in the Australian Third National Mental Health Plan may force resolution of the current problems.     

Antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of psychiatric disorders

The clinical interface between psychiatry and neurology is epilepsy; the pharmacological expression of this interface is antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), as they are used to treat both epilepsy and psychiatric disorders, especially bipolar disorders. The prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity and the risk of suicidal behavior/ideation/suicide are markedly increased in patients with epilepsy (PWE). Though AEDs receive initial indications for the treatment of epilepsy, currently the majority of AEDs are used to treat pain and psychiatric disorders. Thus in selecting the appropriate AEDs for treatment of PWE, consideration should be given to which AEDs best treat the epileptic disorder and the psychiatric comorbidity. This review is an overview of 21 AEDs in which negative psychotropic properties, approved indications in psychiatry, off-label studied uses in psychiatry, and principal uses in psychiatry are presented with literature review. A total of 40 psychiatric uses have been identified. Of the 21 AEDs reviewed, only 5 have U.S. Food and Drug Administration and/or European Medicines Agency psychiatric approval for limited uses; the majority of AEDs are used off-label. Many of these off-label uses are based on case reports, open-label studies, and poorly controlled or small-sample-size studies. In some instances, off-label use persists in the face of negative pivotal trials. Further placebo-controlled (augmentation and monotherapy) parallel-arm research with active comparators is required in the complex field of AED treatment of psychiatric disorders to minimize the treatment gap not only for PWE with psychiatric disorders, but also for psychiatric patients who would benefit from properly studied AEDs while minimizing adverse effects.     

Psychiatric Comorbidity in Chronic Epilepsy: Identification, Consequences, and Treatment of Major Depression

Summary: The purpose of this article is to review the topic of interictal psychiatric comorbidity among adult patients with chronic epilepsy, focusing specifically on those studies that have used contemporary psychiatric nosology. Five specific issues are addressed: (a) the risk and predominant type(s) of psychiatric comorbidity in chronic epilepsy, (b) adequacy of recognition and treatment of psychiatric comorbidity, (c) the additional burdens that comorbid psychiatric disorders impose upon patients with chronic epilepsy, (d) the etiology of these disorders, and (e) strategies for treatment. Current appreciation for these issues in epilepsy is contrasted to related fields (e.g., primary care, psychiatry, and epidemiology), where considerable attention has been devoted to the identification, consequences, and treatment of psychiatric comorbidity. The issue of psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy is reviewed with the aim of identifying a clinical and research agenda that will advance understanding of at least one important psychiatric condition associated with epilepsy—namely, major depression.     

Hospital financing in in-patient psychiatry via DRG-based prospective payment--The Salzburg experience

Hospital financing via case-related prospective payment sometimes is suspected to be responsible for accelerating the "revolving-door"-phenomenon in psychiatry. According to this reasoning, establishing diagnoses-related groups (DRGs) ruling a prospective payment system could not only reduce lengths of stay but could also simultaneously raise hospitalization and readmission rates. This study analyses the Austrian experience after the implementation of such a payment system, the "performance-oriented financing of hospitals" (leistungsorientierte Krankenanstalten-Finanzierung, LKF) in 1997. Time series analyses based on the complete hospital discharge statistics of the Salzburg province were used as methods. Results showed that neither length of stay, nor hospitalization or readmission rates in psychiatry have substansially changed or deviated from their long-term trends after implementation of the LKF system. Other medical disciplines have experienced statistically significant changes. The possibility to transfer these results to the German psychiatric health care system is discussed.     

Social exclusion of the mentally ill -- a critical review and outlook of community psychiatry at the beginning of the 21st century

The social implications and disabilities of long-term mental disorders have been well described and are known for a long time. The classical paradigm of social psychiatry postulating that dehospitalization automatically generates social integration has proven to be wrong. Along that line the view that living in the community supported by different services aiming at integration has also failed to be successful. Without explicitly labelling it: community-based psychiatry has yielded a psychiatry-based community. It never served the majority of the non-chronically mentally ill with disordered social skills who also need specific support or are as well bound for unemployment and social disadvantages. Without doubt, the progress made by community psychiatry in the past was eminently linked to the ideology and implementation of deinstitutionalization. Defining and dealing with social exclusion means a turning point for social and community psychiatry - a new paradigm that could generate a different view upon therapeutical outcomes and the way that therapy and rehabilitation have to be organised and implemented. Especially the example of vocational rehabilitation could mark a stepping stone by initiating further investigations and progress for new approaches in community support. Supported employment programmes have shown the superiority of "place and train" instead of first train in institutions or services and then place on the spot. Thus a so-called inclusion therapy could arise that takes place "in vivo et actu" and near to the individual's real world of tasks and demands. Progress in any part of multidimensional therapy is legitimized only by empirical validation of functional outcome and social inclusion measures. Such an evaluation of complex programmes taking social inclusion into account is sophisticated but seems to be necessary in the field of general psychiatric therapies as well as for the legitimation of financial resources needed. Foreseeing the perspective of social psychiatry a next substantial step could be the identification of social and functional outcome variables.     

Psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review critically discusses recent research findings on psychiatry comorbidity in children and adolescent persons. RECENT FINDINGS: Several epidemiological studies have confirmed previous findings in relation to the high rates of psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents. In particular, psychiatric comorbidity has been detected in children with substance abuse, and with conduct and oppositional defiant, anxiety and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorders. These studies have also investigated the impact comorbidity has on symptom presentation, outcome and service utilization. Although the presence of concurrent psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents is well established, there has been limited research on the need for different treatment modalities in children suffering from more than one disorder. SUMMARY: It is widely accepted that children and adolescents frequently present with more than one psychiatric diagnosis. The substantial variation in psychiatric comorbidity found in the literature may be due to the different methods of data collection as well as to the classification system used. Whether children and adolescents fulfil diagnostic criteria for a mixed condition (International Classification of Diseases-10) or multiple disorders (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV), it is important that the concurrent psychopathology be recognized and treated.     

The stigma of mental illness: anticipation and attitudes among patients with epileptic, dissociative or somatoform pain disorder

The aim of this study was to survey the attitudes of 101 consecutive in- and out-patients with epileptic, dissociative or somatoform pain disorders (mean age: 43 [+/-11] years; 58% female) from either the Department of Psychiatry or Neurology toward anticipated mental illness stigma. The patients were administered a modified 12-item version of Links Stigma Questionnaire. Nearly 60% of all 101 patients believe that "most people" would not allow a mental patient "to take care of their children", "most young women" would be "reluctant to date a man" who has been treated for a mental illness and "most employers would pass over" the application of a psychiatric patient in favour of another applicant. Fifty five percent of the respondents assume that "most people think less of a person who has been in a mental hospital" and over a half of all patients interviewed assert that the general population thinks that psychiatric patients are "less intelligent, less trustworthy and that their opinion is taken less seriously by others". Gender, age and education had no influence on the overall results. There is a high stigmatisation concerning psychiatry even in patients with epilepsy and somatoform/dissociative symptoms with psychiatric comorbidity. Fear of being stigmatized is more pronounced among somatoform pain patients as compared to patients suffering from epileptic or dissocative disorders, with particular reference to close personal relationships.     

Law and psychiatry. Doing forensic work, II: fees, billing, and collections

Forensic practice fees, billing, and collection procedures are quite different from those in general psychiatry. Most forensic practices have far fewer "clients," and individual bills are usually larger. Collections are usually better (and less frequently discounted) in forensic practice, and resolving billing disputes is far more straightforward. Medicare, Medicaid, other insurance coverage, provider networks and agreements, procedure codes, and diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) are all largely irrelevant in forensic work (although sometimes important to direct clinical services in correctional psychiatry or forensic treatment clinics). An understanding of the practicalities and ethics of charging and billing for forensic services greatly simplifies practice management.     

A preliminary study of staff perception of psychiatric services in general hospitals

There has been increasing recognition of the importance of integrating physical and psychiatric care under growing economic pressure. We conducted a survey of staff perception on psychiatric services in four general hospitals. The purpose of this study was to see differences among the staff in their recognition and expectation of the role of the psychiatric department and the need for psychiatric and other staff to work more closely together. Although 81% of psychiatrists recognized their role in acute psychiatry, only 42.6% thought that acute psychiatry was the most important role of psychiatry. Mood disorders were recognized as a psychiatric category in 95.2% of psychiatrists and 54.8% of nonpsychiatrist physicians. Overall satisfaction with psychiatric services in psychiatric and other staff were 54.0% and 68.2%, respectively. Although 85.7% of psychiatrists answered that they supported staff in other departments that have psychiatric or psychological problems, only 53.5% of those staff in other departments were satisfied with their support. Staff in other departments expected psychiatric staff to establish consultation hotlines and to visit other departments regularly. Our results suggest that there are discrepancies between psychiatric and other staff in their perception of psychiatric services, and it is our belief that those gaps must be bridged for better collaboration in general hospitals.     

History and current condition of Russian psychiatry

Abstract Russian psychiatry has a dramatic history, and until now has been at a transitional stage of development. It is facing problems not only common in world psychiatry, but also specific to eastern Europe, in particular Russia. Starting from the beginning of the 1990s, considerable changes have occurred in psychiatry, especially after 1992 when the law on psychiatric care and guarantees of citizens' rights in its provision was adopted. It became the ideological and legislative basis for reforms. However, there are definite obstacles to structural reforms in psychiatry. They are unfavourable technical conditions in many psychiatric clinics, hypercentralization of psychiatric services, shortage of clinical psychologists and social workers in psychiatry, some difficulties in cooperation between psychiatric and general medical institutions. Economic difficulties in the transition period of Russia's social development prevent the overcoming of these problems. They are being actively discussed and some of them are being gradually solved, e.g. the organization of team work in mental health services, the increasing number of specialists on social work, and the involvement of non-government organizations in psychosocial rehabilitation.     

Funding consultation-liaison psychiatry via Medicare screening.

Despite offering many benefits to patients, the hospital, and the hospital staff, an academic psychiatric consultation service is difficult to fund. By screening Medicare patients for psychiatric complications and comorbid conditions, the consultation-liaison (C-L) service can generate incremental revenue for the hospital by moving patients from lower-paying to higher-paying Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs). The C-L service chief can negotiate with the hospital to obtain a portion of these incremental funds to support the C-L service. Concurrent psychiatric disorders that move patients to more complex DRGs include substance abuse, substance dependence, drug-induced delirium, drug-induced organic affective syndrome, and psychotic depression. This paper presents a method of calculating the incremental hospital revenue generated by such screening along with the results of applying the method to selected DRGs at a west coast teaching hospital. Implementing this program at that hospital in fiscal year 1989 would have resulted in screening 142 Medicare patients (2.2% of Medicare admissions), discovering an estimated 25 patients with comorbid psychiatric conditions, and generating $51,800 in incremental hospital revenue. In creating a screening program, a C-L service chief must be prepared to negotiate issues with the medical records department, referring physicians, and the hospital administration.     

Psychotherapy in psychiatry: the current situation and future directions in Germany

The aim of this article is to review how psychotherapy is dispensed to patients in psychiatric treatment and to render the future perspectives of psychotherapy in psychiatric outpatient and inpatient care in Germany. We demonstrate that--according to the currently available data about healthcare providers, allocation of financial resources and curricular regulations--the presently used definition of the term "psychotherapy" is ambiguous. One major problem for the application of psychotherapy in psychiatry is obviously constituted by the dominance of the major guideline therapies ("Richtlinienverfahren") within psychiatric services. Here, guideline therapies do not meet the needs of a significant proportion of acutely, severely and/or chronically ill psychiatric patients and restrain the application of scientifically approved, disorder-oriented and context compliant interventions in psychiatric practice. As a future perspective, we suggest that the training of psychiatrists should impart profound interpersonal skills and provide the competence to offer psychotherapy within a multimodal, modular, and flexible treatment plan on the background of the self-conception of psychiatry as a medical discipline. Moreover, future concepts of psychiatric psychotherapy should promote an evidence-based selection and application of scientifically approved, disorder-oriented, and integrative treatment methods, which are available in growing number.     

Mental health services for people with intellectual disability in Israel--a review of options

Intellectual disability (ID) (often also referred to as "mental retardation," "development disability," "mental handicap," "learning disability" or as "generalized learning difficulties") is common in all countries. Many people with ID suffer from psychiatric/behavioral/emotional disturbances (known as "dual diagnosis"). Specialist psychiatric services are needed to address these problems effectively, but are not currently available in most countries, including Israel. This article sets out to describe the problems, current services in Israel, approaches in other countries and proposed solutions for Israel. We believe it important to enforce laws against discrimination based on disability, to raise the general awareness, knowledge and skills among generic mental health professionals on the topic of intellectual disability by inclusion in university, postgraduate and in-service training curricula, to work towards a form of subspecialty within psychiatry along the lines of the model in the United Kingdom and to establish specialized psychiatric services, possibly functioning as back-up to the generic psychiatric services.     

A UK survey of psychiatric services for older people in general hospitals

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric illness is common in older people in general hospitals, but little is known of the service models operating in the UK, or of the views of old age psychiatrists regarding service provision in this area. We set out to determine the range of UK old age psychiatry service models for older people in general hospital wards, and the opinions of clinicians on future service priorities and development. METHOD: A postal questionnaire survey of old age psychiatrists providing psychiatric services to older people in general hospital wards. RESULTS: 73% of services were provided through a generic, sector-based, consultation psychiatry model. The remaining 27% employed a range of general hospital-based liaison psychiatry services for older people, involved in proactively seeking referrals and educating general hospital staff. Those providing a generic sector-based model were significantly slower at responding to referrals. 89% of respondents were unhappy with their service to older people in general hospital wards, with only 11% preferring the generic sector-based model. Organisational barriers to change identified included the management of mental health care and physical care by different organisations. Training, both of psychiatric staff in this specialist area, and of general hospital staff in the detection and basic management of common psychiatric conditions in the general hospital setting, was felt to be necessary. CONCLUSIONS: The management of co-morbid psychiatric and physical illness in older people is an important issue for health services. Old age psychiatrists are unhappy with the prevalent, reactive, consultation-based model, preferring a range of liaison psychiatry models based in the general hospital. The most important barriers to service development in this area were the separate managerial arrangements for psychiatric and physical care services, and a lack of evidence for effective old age psychiatry services in this setting.     

In favour of a "new social psychiatry". Current focuses and trends of mental health care dealing between integrative and health economic perspectives

Starting from modified sociodemographical, medical, familiar and health economical circumstances it is shown that in different areas of psychiatric supply fundamental offerings are missing or need to be established, thus one has to speak about an undersupply of certain groups (migrants, personality disorders, certain elderly patients). Some of these forward-looking trends and possible prospects in the field of social psychiatry are exemplarily displayed. The thesis is argued and illustrated that the existing social psychiatric institutions require a paradigmatic reorientation, which could be called "New Social psychiatry" and should complement the traditional social psychiatry, which has been orientated to schizophrenic illness, extramural alignment and the rehabilitation purpose of employment up to now.     

Descartes' dogma and damage to Western psychiatry

René Descartes described the concept of mind–body dualism in the 16th century. This concept has been called his error but we prefer to call it his dogma because the error was recognised much later. We studied the original writings translated by various scholars. We believe that his dogma has caused tremendous amount of damage to Western psychiatry. This dualism has created boundaries between mind and body but as we know they are inextricably interlinked and influence each other. This has affected clinical practice and has increased the dichotomy between psychiatric services and the physical health care services in the West at least. This dualism has also contributed to stigma against mental illness, the mentally ill and the psychiatric services. We propose that it is time to abandon this mind–body dualism and to look at the whole patient and their illness experiences as is done in some other health care systems such as Ayurveda.Key words: Diagnosis, history of psychiatry, models/theories of psychiatry, social and political issues