Pacing Maneuver in the Diagnosis of the Mechanism of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Pacing and entrainment maneuvers are essential for establishing the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), but may fail to do so if the SVT terminates or if pacing results in atrioventricular (AV) dissociation as opposed to entrainment of the arrhythmia. We present an unusual case of typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with high degree AV block in which the diagnosis was confirmed using a novel maneuver consisting of simultaneous atrial and ventricular (A + V) pacing. The reproducible response to A + V pacing at varying cycle lengths established the diagnosis of AVNRT in this case. (PACE 2011; 34:e90–e93)     

Electrophysiological characteristics of junctional rhythm during ablation of the slow pathway in different types of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed. RESULTS: In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Radiofrequency ablation of probable atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children with documented supraventricular tachycardia without inducible tachycardia

The reproducible induction of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) during electrophysiological study is critical for the diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), and for determining a therapeutic endpoint for catheter ablation. In the sedated state, there are patients with reentry SVT due to AVNRT who are not inducible at electrophysiological study. This article reports on the empiric slow pathway modification for AVNRT in six pediatric patients (age 6-17, mean 13.3 years) with documented, recurrent, paroxysmal SVT in the setting of a structurally normal heart who were not inducible at electrophysiological study. Atrial and ventricular burst and extrastimulus pacing at multiple drive cycle lengths were performed in the baseline state, during an isuprel infusion, and during isuprel elimination. Single AV nodal (AVN) echo beats were present in all patients, while classic dual AVN physiology was present in three of six patients. Radiofrequency energy was administered in the right posteroseptal AV groove resulting in accelerated junctional rhythm in five of six patients. Postablation testing demonstrated the elimination of echo beats in four patients, while dual AVN physiology and echo beats persisted in two patients. At follow-up (22-49 months, mean 29.5 months), all patients are asymptomatic without recurrence of SVT and are not taking any antiarrhythmic medication. In selected patients, empiric slow pathway modification may be offered as a potential cure in children with recurrent paroxysmal SVT who are not inducible at electrophysiological study. Elimination of slow pathway conduction may serve as a surrogate endpoint, though is not necessary for long-term success.     

A higher than expected prevalence of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Background: Epidemiologic studies have indicated that the prevalence of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is approximately two to three of 1000 persons, of whom 50–60% have atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Although SVT has been reported to account for a significant portion of inappropriate shocks in patients receiving implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs), the incidence of AVNRT is unknown. Objective: To define the incidence of AVNRT in patients with ICDs. Methods and Results: Of 426 patients followed with an ICD, 15 patients with AVNRT were identified (3.5%). AVNRT was noted preimplant in eight patients. One had remote AVNRT and had undergone radiofrequency (RF) ablation several years prior to ICD implantation. Three patients had known episodes and underwent RF ablation prior to ICD implant. Four had AVNRT induced at preimplant electrophysiology study and three had RF ablation prior to ICD implant. Seven patients had clinical episodes of AVNRT after ICD implant and six of seven received inappropriate ICD therapy for AVNRT. All seven patients underwent RF ablation for treatment of AVNRT. No patient who underwent RF ablation had further clinical episodes of SVT, and only one had further inappropriate ICD therapy for sinus tachycardia. Conclusion: The substantially higher prevalence of AVNRT in our followed ICD population (3.5%) compared to the general population may be due to detection bias or electroanatomic changes in the atrioventricular nodal area induced by the accompanying heart disease. In any case, further studies to evaluate the inducibility of AVNRT prior to ICD implant, its prognostic implications, and the role of RF ablation to prevent inappropriate shocks are warranted. (PACE 2011; 34:584–586)     

Differential Entrainment Distinguishes Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia from Atrioventricular Reentrant Tachycardia

Background: Entrainment from the right ventricular (RV) apex and the base has been used to distinguish atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) from atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). The difference in the entrainment response from the RV apex in comparison with the RV base has not been tested. Methods: Fifty‐nine consecutive patients referred for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) were included. Entrainment of SVT was performed from the RV apex and base, pacing at 10–40‐ms faster than the tachycardia cycle length. SA interval was calculated from stimulus to earliest atrial electrogram. Ventricle to atrium (VA) interval was measured from the RV electrogram (apex and base) to the earliest atrial electrogram during tachycardia. The SA‐VA interval from apex and base was measured and the difference between them was calculated. Results: Thirty‐six AVNRT and 23 AVRT patients were enrolled. Mean age was 44 ± 12 years; 52% were male. The [SA‐VA]apex–[SA‐VA]base was demonstrable in 84.7% of patients and measured ?9.4 ± 6.6 in AVNRT and 10 ± 11.3 in AVRT, P < 0.001. The difference was negative for all AVNRT cases and positive for all septal accessory pathways (APs). Conclusion: The difference between entrainment from the apex and base is readily performed and is diagnostic for all AVNRTs and septal APs. (PACE 2010; 1335–1341)     

Specificity of Retrograde Conduction in Screening for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Baseline AV conduction properties (antegrade and retrograde) are often used to assess the presence of dual AV nodal physiology or concealed AV accessory pathways. Although retrograde conduction (RET) is assumed to be a prerequisite for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), its prevalence during baseline measurements has not been evaluated. We reviewed all cases of AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation to determine the prevalence of RET at baseline evaluation and after isoproterenol infusion. Results: Seventy-three patients with AVNRT underwent full electrophysiological evaluation. Sixty-six patients had manifest RET and inducible AVNRT during baseline atrial and ventricular stimulation. Seven patients initially demonstrated complete RET block despite antegrade evidence of dual AV nodal physiology. In 3 of these 7 patients AVNRT was inducible at baseline despite the absence of RET. In the other four patients isoproterenol infusion was required for induction of AVNRT, however only 3 of these 4 patients developed RET. One of these remaining patients had persistent VA block after isoproterenol. Conclusions: The induction of AVNRT in the absence of RET suggests that this is not an obligatory feature of this arrhythmia. Therefore, baseline AV conduction properties are unreliable in assessing the presence of AVNRT and isoproterenol infusions should be used routinely to expose RET and reentrant tachycardia.     

Infraatrial supraventricular tachycardias: mechanisms, diagnosis, and management

Tachycardias are traditionally classified as either ventricular tachycardia (VT) or supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). VT can be defined as a tachycardia which requires only ventricular structures for perpetuation. SVT is defined in terms of exclusion of VT and hence is any tachycardia which requires participation of at least one supraventricular structure for perpetuation. Certain SVTs require only participation of the atrioventricular node (AVN) and the His bundle (HB) but not the atrial myocardium or any of the great thoracic veins for perpetuation and hence can be described as "infraatrial." The three main mechanisms of infraatrial SVTs are: (1) intranodal atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia; (2) junctional ectopic tachycardia; and (3) nodoventricular reentrant tachycardia. The clinical significance of infraatrial SVTs is that they are compatible with any A:V ratio and even atrioventricular (AV) dissociation. Infraatrial SVTs are often suspected when a narrow complex tachycardia presents with apparent AV dissociation and a counterintuitive A:V ratio of < 1:1. However, if the same tachycardia is conducted with aberrant conduction or preexcitation, a broad complex tachycardia with an A:V ratio of < 1:1 will arise and that can be easily mistaken for VT. The possible patterns of electrical association and dissociation between different cardiac structures are examined, and how individual types of infraatrial SVT can be diagnosed and managed are reviewed.     

The results of radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in children

BACKGROUNDS: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation represents a major advance in the management of children with cardiac arrhythmias and has rapidly become the standard of care for the first-ling therapy of supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the results of the RF catheter ablation of SVTs in pediatric patients. METHODS: From December 1989 to August 2005, a total of 228 pediatric patients (age: 9 +/- 7 years, range: 5-18 years; male:female = 117:111) with clinically documented SVT underwent an electrophysiologic study and RF catheter ablation at our institution. RESULTS: The arrhythmias included atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT; n = 140, 61%), atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT; n = 66, 29%), atrial tachycardia (AT; n = 11, 5%), and atrial flutter (AFL; n = 11, 5%). The success rate of the RF catheter ablation was 92% for AVRT, 97% for AVNRT, 82% for AT, and 91% for AFL, respectively. Procedure-related complications were infrequent (8.7%; major complications: high grade AV block (2/231, 0.9%); minor complications: first degree AV block (6/231, 2.6%), reversible brachial plexus injury (2/231, 0.9%), and local hematomas or bruises (10/231, 4.3%)). The recurrence rate was 4.7% (10/212) during a follow-up period of 86 +/- 38 months (0.5-185 months). CONCLUSIONS: The RF catheter ablation was a safe and effective method to manage children with paroxysmal and incessant tachycardia. The substrates of the arrhythmias differed between the pediatric and adult patients. However, the success rate of the ablation, complications, and recurrence during childhood were similar to those of adults.     

Age Related Changes in Dual AV Nodal Physiology

Dual atrioventricular nodal (DAVN) physiology has been reported in up to 63% of pediatric patients with anatomically normal hearts, yet atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) accounts for only 13%–16% of supraventicular tachycardia (SVT) in childhood. The incidence of AVNRT increases with age and becomes the most common form of SVT by adolescence. We investigated the age related electrophysiological responses to programmed atrial and ventricular stimulation in 14 pediatric patients who underwent intracardiac electro-physiological study prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT and who exhibited DAVN physiology. Single atrial and ventricular extrastimuli were placed following drive trains with cycle lengths of 400–700 ms and 350–500 ms, respectively. Six children (mean age 8.2 years, range 5.2–11.5 years) were compared to eight adolescents (mean age 16.6 years, range 13.3–20.7 years). Adolescents were found to have a significantly longer fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) (median 375 vs 270 ms, P = 0.03), slow pathway ERP (median 270 vs 218 ms, P = 0.04), atrio-Hisian (AH) during AVNRT (median 300 vs 225 ms, P = 0.007), and AVNRT cycle length (median 350 vs 290ms, P = 0.03). There was a strong trend for the AH measured at the fast pathway ERP to be longer in adolescents than in children (median 258 vs 198 ms, P = 0.055). The AH at the fast pathway ERP was more strongly correlated with baseline cycle length than with age (r = 0.7, P = 0.01 vs r = 0.5, P = 0.7). There was no significant difference in the retrograde VA conduction between adolescents and children. These results demonstrate an age related difference in AV nodal response to programmed atrial stimuli in pediatric patients with DAVN physiology and AVNRT. These differences are consistent with mechanisms that may explain the increased incidence of AVNRT in adolescents compared to children.     

Incidental dual atrioventricular nodal physiology in children and adolescents: clinical follow-up and implications

Background: Dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology is a substrate for the development of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the risk of developing AVNRT in patients with dual AV nodal physiology is not known. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk of developing AVNRT in children and adolescents with incidental findings of dual AV nodal physiology after accessory pathway ablation. Methods: This is a single center retrospective study of patients who underwent intracardiac electrophysiology study at The Children's Hospital, Denver, from March 1993 to August 2008, with findings of dual AV nodal physiology after successful ablation of an accessory pathway. Follow‐up was obtained by chart review with the primary outcome of recurrent supraventricular tachycardia. Extended clinical follow‐up was also achieved through phone contact with patients or parents of patients. Results: Mean age at initial electrophysiology study was 12.8 years (±3.7 years). Follow‐up was obtained on all 66 patients for a mean duration of 3.1 years (±2.8 years). Mean age at follow‐up was 15.8 years (±4.6 years). Recurrent supraventricular tachycardia occurred in nine of the 66 patients (13.6%). AVNRT was induced in two of the 66 patients (3.0%). Conclusion: This study supports the hypothesis that incidental dual AV nodal physiology does not predict AVNRT in children and adolescents with after successful accessory pathway ablation. (PACE 2010; 33:1528–1532)     

Superior type of atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia: incidence, characteristics, and effect of slow pathway ablation

Background: Atypical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardias (AVNRT) usually exhibit the earliest retrograde atrial activation (ERAA) at the right inferoseptum (Rt-IS) or proximal coronary sinus (PCS). The purpose of this study was to characterize atypical AVNRT with the ERAA at the right superoseptum (Rt-SS).
Methods: Seventy-three atypical AVNRTs induced in 63 cases were classified into the superior type with the ERAA at the Rt-SS and inferior type with the ERAA at the Rt-IS or PCS.
Results: There were nine superior (12%) and 64 inferior types of atypical AVNRT (88%) in seven and 56 cases, respectively. The superior type exhibited a short atrial-His interval during the tachycardia (166 ± 41 ms), long His-atrial interval during the tachycardia (H-At:156 ± 38 ms), and ventricular pacing at the tachycardia cycle length (TCL) (H-Ap:201 ± 36 ms), and evidence for a lower common pathway, including second-degree AV block (four tachycardias) and an H-Ap being longer than the H-At (nine tachycardias). The TCL was shorter in the superior type than in the inferior type (322 ± 35 vs 404 ± 110 ms; P < 0.02). In the inferior type, all tachycardias were eliminated after the ablation at the Rt-IS (44 tachycardias) or PCS (20 tachycardias) where an ERAA was recorded. In the superior type, ablation at the Rt-IS was ineffective; however, ablation at the right midseptum eliminated seven (78%) of the nine tachycardias.
Conclusions: The tachycardia circuit of the superior type might have deviated to a more superior part of Koch's triangle than that of the inferior type.     

Electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation in children with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

BACKGROUND: The majority of cardiac arrhythmias in children are supraventricular tachycardia, which is mainly related to an accessory pathway (AP)-mediated reentry mechanism. The investigation for Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome in adults is numerous, but there is only limited information for children. This study was designed to evaluate the specific electrophysiologic characteristics and the outcome of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in children with WPW syndrome. METHODS: From December 1989 to August 2005, a total of 142 children and 1,219 adults with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) who underwent ablation at our institution were included. We compared the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics between children and adults with WPW syndrome. RESULTS: The incidence of intermittent WPW syndrome was higher in children (7% vs 3%, P=0.025). There was a higher occurrence of rapid atrial pacing needed to induce tachycardia in children (67% vs 53%, P=0.02). However, atrial fibrillation (AF) occurred more commonly in adult patients (28% vs 16%, P=0.003). The pediatric patients had a higher incidence of multiple pathways (5% vs 1%, P<0.001).Both the onset and duration of symptoms were significantly shorter in the pediatric patients. The antegrade 1:1 AP conduction pacing cycle length (CL) and antegrade AP effective refractory period (ERP) in children were much shorter than those in adults with manifest WPW syndrome. Furthermore, the retrograde 1:1 AP conduction pacing CL and retrograde AP ERP in children were also shorter than those in adults. The antegrade 1:1 atrioventricular (AV) node conduction pacing CL, AV nodal ERP, and the CL of the tachycardia were all shorter in the pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the difference in the electrophysiologic characteristics of APs and the AV node between pediatric and adult patients. RF catheter ablation was a safe and effective method to manage children with WPW syndrome.     

Mapping and Ablation of Atypical AVNRT from the Morphologic Left Atrium in a Patient with Dextrocardia and Situs Inversus

A 75‐year‐old woman with dextrocardia, situs inversus, and subpulmonic outflow obstruction presented with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). This SVT was easily inducible during electrophysiology study, and pacing maneuvers during SVT were consistent with atypical, slow‐slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The His bundle was identified in the low postero‐septal morphologic right atrium, at the typical anatomic site for slow pathway ablation of AVNRT. Mapping of the retrograde earliest atrial electrogram during AVNRT localized this site to the mid‐septal morphologic left atrium, and cryoablation at this site terminated the AVNRT and rendered it noninducible. (PACE 2010; e106–e109)     

Electrophysiological Behavior of Atrioventricular Node After Selective Fast or Slow Pathway Ablation in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

One hundred twenty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) underwent catheter ablation using radiofrequency energy. Fast pathway ablation was attempted in the first 16 consecutive patients by application of radiofrequency current in the anterior and superior aspect of the tricuspid annulus. Successful results were accomplished in 13 patients, complete atrioventricular (AV) block occurred in three. One hundred four patients underwent ablation of the slow pathway in the posterior and inferior aspect of the tricuspid annulus, which was successful in 98 patients. The remaining six patients subsequently underwent a fast pathway ablation with successful results in four and AV block in two. Therefore. 102 (98%) of the last 104 patients became free of AVNRT while maintaining intact AV conduction. This study characterizes the electrophysiological properties of the residual AV node following a selective fast or slow pathway ablation.     

Nonfluoroscopic catheter navigation for radiofrequency catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in children

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RCA) of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in children is highly successful but requires exposure to radiation. Nonfluoroscopic mapping systems may significantly reduce fluoroscopy time. METHODS: Forty consecutive pediatric patients who underwent RCA for accessory pathways (AP) or AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with use of a nonfluoroscopic navigation system (Ensite NavX) (group A) were compared retrospectively to 40 consecutive patients with similar diagnoses who underwent RCA with fluoroscopic guidance only (group B). RESULTS: Group A (mean age 12.1+/-2.9 years, mean weight 47+/-13.9 kg) consisted of 11 patients (27.7%) with AVNRT and 29 (72.5%) with AP. Group B (mean age 10.9+/-3.1 years, mean weight 47.1+/-17.1 kg) consisted of 7 patients (17.5%) with AVNRT and 33 (82.5%) with AP. There were no significant differences in AP location, patients with congenital heart disease, and number of radiofrequency lesions. Fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (10.4+/-6.1, range 3.1-28.8 minutes, vs 24.9+/-16.0, range 4.4-82.0 minutes, P<0.0001). Procedure duration was also significantly shorter in group A than in group B (170+/-68.5, range 90-420 minutes, vs 218+/-69.3, range 90-360 minutes, P<0.0001). Initial success was 95% in group A and 100% in group B. Tachycardia recurrences occurred in two patients in group A (5%) and six patients in group B (15%). Final success, including repeat ablations for recurrences or failures, was 100% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a nonfluoroscopic system for catheter navigation significantly reduced fluoroscopy exposure and total procedure duration of RCA of common SVT substrates in children.     

Cycle Length Alternation During Supraventricular Tachycardia: Occurrence and Mechanism in a Canine Model of AV Reentrant Tachycardia

Cycle length alternation (CLA) is commonly observed during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) onset and termination. The present study was designed to gain insights into the mechanism and potential clinical relevance of CLA by comparing computer simulations of tachycardia to directly observed behavior in a canine model of AV reentrant tachycardia (AVRT). The computer model was based on the hypothesis that CLA is secondary to feedback between AV nodal output during SVT and subsequent AV nodal input, and used the measured anterograde AV nodal recovery curve (AV vs A1A2) to predict sequential AV and RR intervals during SVT. Orthodromic AVRT was created experimentally in 11 open-chested, autonomically-blocked (atropine plus nadolol) dogs using a sensing and pacing circuit that mimicked a retrograde-conducting accessory pathway. Steady-state cycle length and AV interval during experimental AVRT closely paralleled predictions made by the computer model. CLA appeared consistently at the onset of experimental AVRT at programmed VA intervals less than or equal to 100 msec (corresponding to VA less than or equal to 150 msec as measured clinically) in all dogs. The amplitude and duration of CLA increased as the VA interval decreased, and closely paralleled predictions based on the computer model. Abrupt accelerations in atrial pacing to the same rate as AVRT did not result in alternation of cycle length. In conclusion, alternation of cycle length results from feedback between AV nodal output and subsequent AV nodal input at the onset of reentrant supraventricular tachycardia, and does not require changes in autonomic tone or dual AV nodal pathways. CLA occurrence, amplitude, and duration are predictable based on AV node recovery properties, and depend on retrograde conduction properties of the reentrant circuit. The presence of CLA suggests that the AV node is an integral component of the SVT reentry circuit, and may be useful clinically to identify the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardias.     

Shortcut Link Between the Fast and Slow Pathways and the Mechanism of Cure in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia by Catheter Ablation

The mechanism of cure in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) by catheter ablation has not been fully clarified. We hypothesized that disruption of a shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways is responsible for the elimination of tachycardia. Results: AVNRT was eliminated in 20 patients by catheter ablation. In five patients (25%; group 1) slow pathway conduction disappeared 1 week after ablation. In six patients (30%; group II), the effective refractory period of the slow pathway was prolonged by more than 50 ms (212 ± 81 ms vs 340 ± 81 ms; P < 0.05). In the remaining nine patients (45%; group III), there was no change in the refractory period (270 ± 65 ms vs 273 ± 74 ms), although tachycardia was not inducible. A shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways was examined by comparing the A-H intervals over the slow pathway during the tachycardia and during atrial pacing at the tachycardia cycle length. Prior to ablation, a shortcut link was assumed in 1 of group I patients, 2 of group II patients, and 8 of group III patients. Of the 9 patients in whom the slow pathway was not impaired after ablation (group III), 8 patients were found to have a shortcut link, while 8 of 11 patients with impairment of the slow pathway after ablation (groups I and II) had no shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with a shortcut link between the fast and slow pathways, slow pathway conduction itself does not need to be impaired to eliminate the AVNRT, whereas in patients without this shortcut link, slow pathway conduction must be impaired.     

Long-Term Antitachycardia Pacing Experience for Supraventricular Tachycardia

A pacemaker was used to control drug-resistant reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 40 patients. An antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 37 for SVT; in one for ventricular tachycardia that could also be used to terminate SVT; in one SVT could be terminated with an activity rate variable pacemaker; and in one a DDD pacemaker was used for prevention and termination of SVT. Twenty patients had AV nodal reentrant tachycardias, eight had tachycardias due to a concealed accessory pathway, eight had a Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, three had reentrant atrial tachycardias, and one had atrial flutter. Twenty-two patients were paced from the right atrium, five from the coronary sinus, ten from the right ventricle, and three had a DDD pacemaker. During a total follow-up period of 1,503 (mean 38) months an estimated 16,240 episodes of tachycardia were terminated promptly at home, 58 required several attempts, 57 episodes lasted longer than 30 minutes but did not require medical attention, and 11 required hospital admission. Hospital admission for SVT decreased from one per patient-month (in the 3 months before implantation) to 1 per 137 patient-months after implantation. Additional reentrant tachycardias occurred in 13 patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in combination with a conservative antitachycardia pacing mode was required in four patients paced from the atrium to avoid pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was used in 42% of patients to help control SVT. Conclusions: (1) Drug-resistant SVTs can be safely and effectively managed on the long-term with antitachycardia pacemakers. (2) Rapid termination of SVT improved the quality-of-life significantly by avoiding prolonged episodes of tachycardia and repetitive hospital admissions.     

Is Vagal Innervation to the Atrioventricular Node Impaired After Radiofrequency Ablation of the Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway?

To assess the potentially adverse effects of RF catheter ablation (RFCA) of the slow AV nodal pathway on the parasympathetic innervation to the AV node in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), AV nodal conduction was evaluated following vagal stimulation by means of a phenylephrine bolus injection (200 μg) before and after RFCA in ten patients (mean age, 37 ± 14 years). Nine patients with AV reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) due to a left free wall accessory pathway served as a control group (mean age of 37 ± 12 years). Whereas no prolongation of the AH interval was observed in the AVNRT group following the phenylephrine bolus during sinus rhythm, despite a significant slowing in sinus rate, phenylephrine administration in AVRT patients was associated with both slowing of the sinus rate and prolongation of the AH interval. Following successful RFCA, the same responses were observed. To delineate the indirect effect of heart rate on AV conduction in response to the phenylephrine bolus, the AH interval was also measured during fixed atrial pacing. A marked prolongation of the AH interval occurred in both groups following phenylephrine administration. This prolongation was biphasic in 50% of A VNRT patients before ablation, suggesting a predominant effect of vagal stimulation on the fast AV nodal pathway. RFCA was associated with disappearance of discontinuous AV conduction in all but one patient with AVNRT. Vagal stimulation caused the same amount of AH interval prolongation as before RFCA in both study groups. In conclusion, patients with AVNRT have a preserved modulation of AV nodal conduction in response to vagal stimulation during sinus rhythm. In addition, vagal stimulation seems to exert a predominant effect on the fast A V nodal pathway. RFCA of the slow AV nodal pathway in patients with A VNRT does not cause detectable damage to the vagal innervation to the AV node.     

Coexistence of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia with Other Forms of Arrhythmias

Objective

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the association of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with other forms of arrhythmia in individual patients and its consequences for treatment.

Subjects and Methods

This study comprised 493 consecutive patients aged 16–88 years (296 women and 197 men) who were diagnosed with a form of AVNRT via a standard 4-catheter electrophysiological study (EPS). Patients were clinically followed (range 0.5–12 years) at a single center.

Results

Coexistence of AVNRT with other types of tachycardias was observed in 197 (40%) patients. Atrial fibrillation was found most frequently in 94 (19%) patients as follows: focal atrial tachycardia, n = 40 (8%); atrial flutter, n = 32 (6%), and AV reentrant tachycardia, n = 22 (4%). Double tachycardia was present in 140 (30%) patients, and more than 2 different types of tachycardias were present in 57 (12%) patients. Transitions between AVNRT and other tachycardias occurred in 25 (5%) patients. Two or more tachycardias were ablated in 42 (9%) patients. The majority of patients were free of symptoms at the first follow-up, whereas 130 (26%) patients reported a variety of symptoms.

Conclusion

Coexistence of AVNRT with other types of arrhythmias was a common finding among these patients. The most frequently observed double tachycardia was the combination of AVNRT with atrial tachyarrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation, with a potential significance for further patient management.Key Words: Supraventricular tachycardia, Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, Electrophysiological study, Radiofrequency catheter ablation, Atrial fibrillation