Should insertion of intramedullary nails for tibial fractures be with or without reaming? A prospective, randomized study with 3.8 years' follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To determine if any differences exist in healing and complications between reamed and unreamed nailing in patients with tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Forty-five patients with displaced closed and open Gustilo type I-IIIA fractures of the central two thirds of the tibia. INTERVENTION: Stabilization of tibial fractures either with a slotted, stainless steel reamed nail or a solid, titanium unreamed nail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Nonunions, time to fracture healing, and rate of malunions. RESULTS: The average time to fracture healing was 16.7 weeks in the reamed group and 25.7 weeks in the unreamed group. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.004). There were three nonunions, all in the unreamed nail group. Two of these fractures healed after dynamization by removing static interlocking screws. The third nonunion did not heal despite exchange reamed nailing 2 years after the primary surgery and dynamization with a fibular osteotomy after an additional 1 year. There were two malunions in the reamed group and four malunions in the unreamed group. There were no differences for all other outcome measurements. CONCLUSION: Unreamed nailing in patients with tibial shaft fractures may be associated with higher rates of secondary operations and malunions compared with reamed nailing. The time to fracture healing was significantly longer with unreamed nails.     

Closed tibial shaft fractures: management and treatment complications. A review of the prospective literature.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results and complications of the various modalities for treating closed fractures of the tibial shaft described in the prospective literature. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search of the English language literature from 1966 to 1999 was conducted using the MeSH heading "tibial fractures." Studies pertaining to the management of closed tibial shaft fractures were reviewed, and their reference lists were searched for additional articles. STUDY SELECTION: An analysis of the relevant prospective, randomized controlled trials was performed. Studies including confounding data on open fractures or fractures in children were excluded. The 13 remaining studies were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Raw data were extracted and pooled for each method of treatment. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 13 studies described 895 tibial shaft fractures treated by application of a plaster cast, fixation with plate and screws, and reamed or unreamed intramedullary nailing. Although definitions varied, the combined incidence of delayed and nonunion was lower with operative treatment (2.6% with plate fixation, 8.0% with reamed nailing and 16.7% with unreamed nailing) than with closed treatment (17.2%). The incidence of malunion was similarly lower with operative treatment (0% with plate fixation, 3.2% with reamed nailing and 11.8% with unreamed nailing) than with closed treatment (31.7%). Superficial infection was most common with plate fixation (9.0%) compared with 2.9% for reamed nailing, 0.5% for unreamed nailing and 0% for closed treatment. The incidence of osteomyelitis was similar for all groups. Rates of reoperation ranged from 4.7% to 23.1%. CONCLUSIONS: All forms of treatment for tibial shaft fractures are associated with complications. A knowledge of the incidence of each complication facilitates the consent process. To fully resolve the controversy as to the best method of treatment, a large, randomized, controlled trial is required. This review more precisely predicts the expected incidence of complications, allowing the numbers of required patients to be more accurately determined for future randomized controlled studies.     

Reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of open and closed tibial fractures: a subgroup analysis of randomised trials

The choice between reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of open and closed tibial fractures is an ongoing controversy. We carried out a comprehensive search strategy. Six eligible randomised controlled trials were included. Three reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted outcome data. Analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.0. The results showed lower risks of tibial fracture nonunion and implant failures with reamed nails compared to unreamed nails in closed tibial fractures [relative risk (RR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21–0.89, P = 0.008 for nonunion and RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.22–0.56, P < 0.0001 for implant failures], but no statistical differences in risk reduction of malunion, compartment syndrome, embolism and infection. Our results suggested no statistical differences in risk reduction of all the complications evaluated between reamed and unreamed nails in open tibial fractures. In conclusion, our study recommended reamed nails for the treatment of closed tibial fractures. But the choice for open tibial fractures remains uncertain.     

Early unreamed intramedullary nailing without a safety interval and simultaneous flap coverage following external fixation in type IIIB open tibial fractures: a report of four successful cases

The conversion method from external fixation (EF) to intramedullary nailing (IMN) for open tibia fractures, especially to Gustilo type IIIB open tibia fractures, have potentially high risk of infections. We document a report of a more progressive approach in four consecutive cases of type IIIB open tibial fractures successfully managed with early unreamed IMN without a safety interval and simultaneous flap coverage following EF. The mean patients age at the time of injury was 43.8 years (range 23-64 years), and three patients were male. The timing from EF to IMN without safety interval combined with well-vascularised flap (free latissimus dorsi flaps in two patients and pedicled soleus flaps in two patients) ranged 48 to 72 hours. Average time to union was 14 months (range 9-21 months). There was one nonunion patient whose fracture healing was gained by reamed IMN without bone grafting. However, there were no infections. The functions in all patients were satisfactory. This early unreamed IMN without a safety interval and with simultaneous flap coverage following EF is a useful and effective option for treating type IIIB open tibial fractures.     

Current management of tibial shaft fractures: A survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons

Background and purpose?Strategies to manage tibial fractures include nonoperative and operative approaches. Strategies to enhance healing include a variety of bone stimulators. It is not known what forms of management for tibial fractures predominate among Canadian orthopedic surgeons. We therefore asked a representative sample of orthopedic trauma surgeons about their management of tibial fracture patients.

Methods?This was a cross-sectional survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons. We inquired about demographic variables and current tibial shaft fracture management strategies.

Results?268 surgeons completed the survey, a response rate of 60%. Most respondents (80%) managed closed tibial shaft fracture operatively; 47% preferred reamed intramedullary nailing and 40% preferred unreamed. For open tibial shaft fractures, 59% of surgeons preferred reamed intramedullary nailing. Some surgeons (16%) reported use of bone stimulators for management of uncomplicated open and closed tibial shaft fractures, and almost half (45%) made use of this adjunctive modality for complicated tibial shaft fractures. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and electrical stimulation proved equally popular (21% each) and 80% of respondents felt that a reduction in healing time of 6 weeks or more, attributed to a bone stimulator, would be clinically important.

Interpretation?Current practice regarding orthopedic management of tibial shaft fractures in Canada strongly favors operative treatment with intramedullary nailing, although respondents were divided in their preference for reamed and unreamed nailing. Use of bone stimulators is common as an adjunctive modality in this injury population. Large randomized trials are needed to provide better evidence to guide clinical decision making regarding the choice of reamed or unreamed nailing for tibial shaft fractures, and to inform surgeons about the actual effect of bone stimulators.     

Exchange nailing for failure of initially rodded tibial shaft fractures

This retrospective study evaluated 32 patients who underwent exchange nailing for initially rodded nonunited tibial shaft fractures during a 5-year period. High-energy trauma accounted for 22 fractures; 19 fractures were open. An unreamed nail was initially used to stabilize all but 2 fractures. Implant failure occurred in 31% of fractures, mostly in distal-third fractures, with a failure rate of 34%. Average time from injury to exchange nailing was 36 weeks (range: 6-148 weeks) and consisted of closed reamed nailing and fibulectomy in 27 cases. Healing occurred an average of 20 weeks (range: 6-47 weeks) after postexchange nailing in 27 (84%) fractures. Four (12.5%) fractures healed after additional procedures. There was 1 persistent nonunion. Factors leading to delay in union time included comminution, healed fibula, and proximal location. Multiple regression analysis using survival data at P<.05 showed a significant correlation between fracture configuration and fixation method (locked, dynamic, and unlocked) on time to union. Exchange nailing with closed reaming and fibulectomy is a viable option for treating failures of primarily nailed tibial fractures. Increased stability and stimulation of arrested bone healing may account for the good outcome. The advantages of repeat reamed nailings should be weighed against the possible adverse effect of reaming on bone vascularity.     

Effect of acute reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing on compartment pressure when treating closed tibial shaft fractures: a randomized prospective study

OBJECTIVE: To compare anterior and deep posterior compartment pressures during reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of displaced, closed tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Randomized prospective study. SETTING: University Hospital/Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Forty-eight adults with forty-nine fractures treated with intramedullary nailing within three days of injury. INTERVENTION: After intraoperative placement of compartment pressure monitors, the tibia fractures were treated by either unreamed intramedullary nailing or reamed intramedullary nailing. A fracture table and skeletal traction were not used in any of these procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Compartment pressures and deltaP ([diastolic blood pressure] - [compartment pressure]) were measured immediately preoperatively, intraoperatively, and for twenty-four hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Compartment syndrome did not occur in any patient. Peak average pressures were obtained during reaming in the reamed group (30.0 millimeters of mercury anterior compartment, 34.7 millimeters of mercury deep posterior compartment) and during nail insertion in the unreamed group (33.9 millimeters of mercury anterior compartment, 35.2 millimeters of mercury deep posterior compartment). The average pressures quickly returned to less than thirty millimeters of mercury and remained there for the duration of the study. The deep posterior compartment pressures were lower in the reamed group than in the unreamed group at ten, twelve, fourteen, sixteen, eighteen, twenty, twenty-two, and twenty-four hours postoperatively (p < 0.05 at each of these times. A statistically significant difference between anterior compartment pressures could not be shown with the numbers available. The deltaP values were greater than thirty millimeters of mercury at all times after nail insertion in both the reamed and unreamed groups. CONCLUSION: These data support acute (within three days of injury) reamed intramedullary nailing of closed, displaced tibial shaft fractures without the use of a fracture table.     

股骨干骨折髓内针固定术后出现全身炎性反应综合征的回顾研究

目的回顾股骨干骨折髓内针固定扩髓与非扩髓患者术后发生全身炎性反应综合征（SIRS）情况,探讨髓内针固定与发生SIRS的关系。方法1997年4月至2005年4月股骨干骨折患者324例,按伤情分为轻度创伤组（n=179）和中度创伤组（n=145）。治疗采取闭合复位带锁髓内针固定,其中轻度创伤组64例、中度创伤组51例予以扩髓。分别记录每名患者入院后每日的体温、心率、呼吸频率,术后每6h记录相关数据,任何一项出现异常的患者即行血细胞分类计数,记录SIRS发生的情况。检测数据按不同伤情、扩髓与否进行分组,计算SIRS在各组中的发生率,并对之进行组内分组资料的卡方检验。结果术后早期出现SIRS者124例（发生率38．3％）,其中轻度创伤组61例（24例扩髓,37例未扩髓）,中度创伤组63例（27例扩髓,36例未扩髓）。124例中的119例经严密观测及常规术后治疗顺利恢复,5例则出现并发症。统计结果显示SIRS的发生率各组间差异无显著性。结论股骨干髓内针固定术本身会对创伤后的机体产生一定影响,导致发生SIRS;扩髓或非扩髓并不会对患者术后SIRS的发生与否产生明显的影响。     

A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft

OBJECTIVES: To determine if there are differences in healing, complications, or number of procedures required to obtain union among open and closed tibia fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nails inserted with and without reaming. DESIGN: Prospective, surgeon-randomized comparative study. SETTING: Level One trauma center. PATIENTS: Ninety-four consecutive patients with unstable closed and open (excluding Gustilo Grade IIIB and IIIC) fractures of the tibial shaft treated with IM nail insertion between November 1, 1994, and June 30, 1997. INTERVENTION: Interlocked IM nail insertion with and without medullary canal reaming. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to union, type and incidence of complications, and number of secondary procedures performed to obtain union. RESULTS: For open fractures, there were no significant differences in the time to union or number of additional procedures performed to obtain union in patients with reamed nail insertion compared with those without reamed insertion. A higher percentage of closed fractures were healed at four months after reamed nail insertion compared with unreamed insertion (p = 0.040), but there was not a difference at six and twelve months. More secondary procedures were needed to obtain union after unreamed nail insertion for the treatment of closed tibia fractures, but the difference was not statistically significant given the limited power of our study (p = 0.155). Broken screws were seen only in patients treated with smaller-diameter nails inserted without reaming, and the majority occurred in patients who were noncompliant with weight-bearing restrictions. There were no differences in rates of infection or compartment syndrome. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of reamed insertion of IM nails for the treatment of closed tibia fractures, which led to earlier time to union without increased complications. In addition, canal reaming did not increase the risk of complications in open tibia fractures.     

Strategies and outcomes in severe open tibial shaft fractures at a major trauma center: A large retrospective case-series

BACKGROUNDSevere open tibia fractures are challenging to treat with a lack of published clear management strategies. Our aim was to provide an overview of the largest single-center experience in the literature, with minimum 1-year follow-up, of adult type 3 open tibial shaft fractures at Cambridge University Hospitals (a United Kingdom major trauma center). We sought to define patient characteristics and our main outcome measures were infection, union and re-fracture.AIMTo retrospectively define patient and injury characteristics, present our surgical methods and analyze our outcomes–namely infection, union and re-fracture rates.METHODSConsecutive series of 74 patients with 75 open tibial fractures treated between 2014 and 2020 (26 classified as Gustilo-Anderson 3A, 47 were 3B and two were 3C). Nine patients underwent intramedullary nailing (IMN), 61 underwent Taylor spatial frame (TSF) fixation and 5 were treated with Masquelet technique (IMN and subsequent bone grafting).RESULTSMean follow-up was 16 mo (IMN) and 25 mo (TSF). We had an infection rate of 6.7% (5), non-union rate of 4% (3) and re-fracture rate of 2.7% (2). Average time to union was 22 wk for IMN and 38.6 wk for TSF. Thirty-three cases had a bone defect with a mean of 5.4 cm (2-11). Patient age, sex, diabetes, smoking status or injury severity did not have a significant effect on union time with either fixation method. Our limb salvage rate was 98.7%.CONCLUSIONGrade 1 to 3A injuries can effectively be treated with reamed or unreamed IMN. Grade 3B/C injuries are best treated by circular external fixators as they provide good, reproducible outcomes and allow large bone defects to be addressed via distraction osteogenesis.     

Should the tibia be reamed when nailing?

A systematic review was performed to assess reamed and unreamed tibial nailing. Only prospective, randomised studies comparing reamed and unreamed tibial nailing in adults were included. A literature search found 1200 possible articles. There were seven comparative studies. These articles were independently assessed by all three authors. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. Each outcome measure tested was assessed for heterogeneity. If significant heterogeneity was present, data from the studies was not combined. If there was no significant heterogeneity, a combined odds ratio was calculated using a fixed effects model and a Z-test was performed to test the overall effect. Two hundred and ninety-one tibial shaft fractures were entered into the included studies. Two hundred and eighty (96%) were followed up (148 reamed; 132 unreamed). There was an increased non-union rate when the tibia was not reamed (p = 0.02). Screw breakage was more common in the unreamed group (p<0.0001). This study could find little difference in the incidence of other complications following reamed or unreamed tibial nailing.     

Exchange reamed nailing for aseptic nonunion of the tibia

BACKGROUND: Exchange reamed nailing of the tibia is a common procedure in the treatment of an aseptic tibial nonunion. However, reports in the literature supporting this technique are limited. METHODS: Forty patients with a tibial nonunion after initial unreamed intramedullary nailing were retrospectively assessed after an exchange reamed nailing. The main outcome measurements included radiographic and clinical union as well as time from exchange reamed nailing to union. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients achieved union of their fracture (95%). The average time from exchange nailing to union was 29 +/- 21 weeks. Complications included one deep vein thrombosis (2.5%) and two hardware failures (5%). CONCLUSION: Exchange reamed nailing for nonunions of the tibia results in a high union rate and is associated with a low complication rate. This technique is recommended as a standard procedure for aseptic tibial nonunions after initial unreamed intramedullary nailing.     

Obesity is associated with increased postoperative complications after operative management of tibial shaft fractures

ObjectivesTo assess the association of obesity and postoperative complications after operative management of tibial shaft fractures.MethodsPatients who underwent operative management of a tibial shaft fracture were identified in a national database by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for: (1) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and (2) intramedullary nailing (IMN) procedures in the setting of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes for tibial shaft fracture. These groups were then divided into non-obese, obese, and morbidly obese cohorts using ICD-9 codes. Each cohort was then assessed for grouped complications within 90 days, removal of implants within 6 months, and nonunion within 9 months postoperatively. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.ResultsFrom 2005 to 2012, 14,638 patients who underwent operative management of tibial shaft fractures were identified, including 4425 (30.2%) ORIF and 10,213 (69.8%) IMN. Overall, 1091 patients (7.4%) were coded as obese and 820 (5.6%) morbidly obese. In each operative group, obesity and morbid obesity was associated with a substantial increase in the rate of major and minor medical complications, venous thromboembolism, infection, procedures for implant removal, and nonunion.ConclusionsIn patients who undergo either ORIF or IMN for tibial shaft fractures, obesity and its related medical comorbidities are associated with significantly increased rates of postoperative medical complications, infection, nonunion, and implant removal compared to non-obese patients.     

Contributing factors affecting initial bony healing in interlocking nailings for femoral shaft fractures

The objective of this study was to evaluate bony healing and predict factors affecting bony healing of femoral fractures treated with interlocking nailing (ILN) in static or dynamic conditions, and in reamed or unreamed procedures. Seventy-four femoral fractures (69 patients) were initially stabilized with ILNs in static condition. Among these fractures, ten static ILNs were dynamized after approximately 6 (median 6.4, range 1–13) months because of poor fracture healing. Reamed ILNs were performed for 55 fractures and unreamed ILNs for 19 fractures. Clinical and roentgenograhic processes were analyzed with emphasis on whether or not ILNs were dynamized. To evaluate any significant contributing factors affecting the nonunion of femoral shaft fractures treated with ILNs, logistic regression analysis was done. The union rates of static ILNs and dynamized ILNs were 92% (59/64) and 70% (7/10) respectively, but there was no significant difference between them. Five nonunions were seen in reamed ILNs and three in unreamed ILNs. The predictive logistic regression equation for nonunion was as follows: Log 1-p/p=1.05 -1.20 × AO/ASIF fracture grade in the femur -3.07 × existence of multiskeletal trauma in lower extremity + 0.06 × age -1.11 × smoking history -0.3 × existence of polytrauma -0.626 × the severity of soft tissue injury ( p=0.002; each variable in the above equation was arranged according to the significant order). Among the variables, AO fracture grade (type C) in the femur and existence of multiskeletal trauma in lower extremity were significantly related to nonunion. Static ILN in most femoral shaft fractures does not inhibit the process of fracture healing. The following associated skeletal lesions were our concerns for nonunion and broken nail in static or dynamic ILNs: (1) C-type femoral fracture; and (2) existence of multiskeletal trauma, such as double lesions in the ipsilateral femur, floating knee injury, and bilateral femoral fractures.     

Surgical factors contributing to nonunion in femoral shaft fracture followingintramedullary nailing

Purpose: To explore the possible surgical factors related with nonunion in femoral shaft fracture following intramedullary nailing. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed totally 425 patients with femoral shaft fracture in level I urban trauma center, including 254 males and 171 females, with an average age of 37.6 (ranging from 21 to 56) years old. The inclusion criteria included: (1) traumatically closed fracture of femoral shaft, with preoperative films showing non-comminuted fracture, such as transverse fracture, oblique fracture or spiral fracture; (2) closed reduction and fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail at 3e7 days after trauma; (3) complete follow-up data available. The relationship between the following factors (fracture site, reduction degree, direction of nail insertion and nail size) and nonunion was studied. Results: The incidence of femoral nonunion was 2.8% in patients with closed simple fracture undergoing interlocking intrameduallary nailing, including 11 cases of hypertrophic nonunion. Nonunion was related significantly to distal fracture, unsatisfactory reduction and unreamed nail (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between antegrade nail and retrograde nail (p>0.05). Conclusions: Nonunion in femoral shaft facture following interlocking intramedullary nailing is related to fracture site, fracture reduction and nail diameter. The choice of reamed nails or unreamed nails depends on the fracture site and reduction degree.     

Intramedullary nailing for open fractures of the femoral shaft: evaluation of contributing factors on deep infection and nonunion using multivariate analysis

The purpose of this study was to use multivariate analysis to evaluate contributing factors affecting deep infection and nonunion of open femoral fractures treated with locked intramedullary nailing (IMN). We examined 89 open femoral fractures (88 patients) treated with immediate or delayed locked IMN in static fashion at the Kitasato University Hospital from 1988 to 2001. Multiple regression models were derived to determine predictors of deep infection and nonunion. The following predictive variables of deep infection were selected for analysis: age, sex, Gustilo type (I+II or III), fracture grade by AO type (A or B+C), fracture site (proximal site+distal site or middle site), timing or method of IMN, reamed or unreamed nailing (R versus UR), debridement time (< or =6 h or >6 h), existence of polytrauma (ISS<18 or ISS> or =18), and existence of floating knee injury (+ or -). The predictive variables of nonunion selected for analysis were the same as those for deep infection, with the addition of deep infection (+ or -). Five fractures (5.6%) developed deep infections: one Gustilo type II and four type III. Multivariate analysis revealed that only Gustilo type significantly correlated with occurrence of deep infection (p<0.05). Nonunion occurred in 12 fractures (14.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that only fracture grade by AO type significantly correlated with occurrence of nonunion (p<0.02).     

Comparison between intramedullary nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for tibial shaft fractures

IntroductionIntramedullary nailing (IMN) is currently considered the gold standard in the surgical treatment of tibial shaft fractures in adult patients. In this case-control comparative study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and IMN in treating tibial shaft fractures.Materials and methodsThe clinical and radiological outcomes, such as a modified trauma scale, operation time, fracture healing, rate of re-operation, and complications such as malunion, nonunion, shortening, and infection were assessed between IMN and MIPO for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.ResultsSeventy-three skeletally mature patients who underwent IMN (group I) or MIPO (group M) for a closed extra-articular tibial shaft fracture (AO/OTA type 42) from June 2010 to May 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age was 51.16 (18~79) years, and the mean follow-up period was 22 (12~50) months. Bony union was achieved in all cases but one for each group - group I (35 cases) and group M (36 cases) (p > 0.05). Mean callus formation was observed in 12 (8 – 16) weeks in both groups (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in operative time, hospital stay, bone healing, and the rate of complications among the two groups (p > 0.05). There was also no postoperative difference in functional evaluation between the two methods (p > 0.05).ConclusionsNo discrepancy was found in radiological and clinical outcomes between IMN and MIPO for tibial shaft fractures. It can be concluded that both IMN and MIPO are equally effective treatment modalities for tibial shaft fractures.     

Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia

We have systematically reviewed the effect of alternative methods of stabilisation of open tibial fractures on the rates of reoperation, and the secondary outcomes of nonunion, deep and superficial infection, failure of the implant and malunion by the analysis of 799 citations on the subject, identified from computerised databases. Although 68 proved to be potentially eligible, only eight met all criteria for inclusion. Three investigators independently graded the quality of each study and extracted the relevant data. One study (n = 56 patients) suggested that the use of external fixators significantly decreased the requirement for reoperation when compared with fixation with plates. The use of unreamed nails, compared with external fixators (five studies, n = 396 patients), reduced the risk of reoperation, malunion and superficial infection. Comparison of reamed with unreamed nails showed a reduced risk of reoperation (two studies, n = 132) with the reamed technique. An indirect comparison between reamed nails and external fixators also showed a reduced risk of reoperation (two studies) when using nails. We have identified compelling evidence that unreamed nails reduced the incidence of reoperations, superficial infections and malunions, when compared with external fixators. The relative merits of reamed versus unreamed nails in the treatment of open tibial fractures remain uncertain.     

Immediate versus delayed intramedullary nailing for open fractures of the tibial shaft: A multivariate analysis of factors affecting deep infection and fracture healing

Background:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate contributing factors affecting deep infection and fracture healing of open tibia fractures treated with locked intramedullary nailing (IMN) by multivariate analysis.

Materials and Methods:

We examined 99 open tibial fractures (98 patients) treated with immediate or delayed locked IMN in static fashion from 1991 to 2002. Multivariate analyses following univariate analyses were derived to determine predictors of deep infection, nonunion, and healing time to union. The following predictive variables of deep infection were selected for analysis: age, sex, Gustilo type, fracture grade by AO type, fracture location, timing or method of IMN, reamed or unreamed nailing, debridement time (≤6 h or >6 h), method of soft-tissue management, skin closure time (≤1 week or >1 week), existence of polytrauma (ISS< 18 or ISS≥18), existence of floating knee injury, and existence of superficial/pin site infection. The predictive variables of nonunion selected for analysis was the same as those for deep infection, with the addition of deep infection for exchange of pin site infection. The predictive variables of union time selected for analysis was the same as those for nonunion, excluding of location, debridement time, and existence of floating knee and superficial infection.

Results:

Six (6.1%; type II Gustilo n=1, type IIIB Gustilo n=5) of the 99 open tibial fractures developed deep infections. Multivariate analysis revealed that timing or method of IMN, debridement time, method of soft-tissue management, and existence of superficial or pin site infection significantly correlated with the occurrence of deep infection (P< 0.0001). In the immediate nailing group alone, the deep infection rate in type IIIB + IIIC was significantly higher than those in type I + II and IIIA (P = 0.016). Nonunion occurred in 17 fractures (20.3%, 17/84). Multivariate analysis revealed that Gustilo type, skin closure time, and existence of deep infection significantly correlated with occurrence of nonunion (P < 0.05). Gustilo type and existence of deep infection were significantly correlated with healing time to union on multivariate analysis (r² = 0.263, P = 0.0001).

Conclusion:

Multivariate analyses for open tibial fractures treated with IMN showed that IMN after EF (especially in existence of pin site infection) was at high risk of deep infection, and that debridement within 6 h and appropriate soft-tissue managements were also important factor in preventing deep infections. These analyses postulated that both the Gustilo type and the existence of deep infection is related with fracture healing in open fractures treated with IMN. In addition, immediate IMN for type IIIB and IIIC is potentially risky, and canal reaming did not increase the risk of complication for open tibial fractures treated with IMN.     

Marknagelung geschlossener Unterschenkelschaftbrüche

Intramedullary nailing is the operative method of first choice for closed fractures of the tibial shaft. In general, the method is well taught and has proven its worth in many clinics. If attention is paid to the technical recommendations very good results can be obtained with both the reamed and the unreamed technique. In German-speaking areas unreamed locked nailing with solid nails is preferred; in the Anglo-American world the reamed technique is more widely accepted. After-treatment aims at achieving early functional recovery. The favorable biomechanical conditions for load transfer associated with osteosynthesis mean that weight-bearing is possible early, even while the soft tissue situation is still settling down and the fracture healing. Provided there are no complications or malalignments, closed intramedullary nailing of closed tibial shaft fractures is one of the most gratifying operative procedures permitting early functional rehabilitation.