免胆道镜腹腔镜胆总管探查术82例经验

免胆道镜腹腔镜胆总管探查术指的是在腹腔镜胆总管探查术中不使用胆道镜技术,而用常规开腹手术器械进行探查、取石.我们在此方面做了一些尝试,取得了一定经验,现报告如下.     

Operative choledochoscopy in common bile duct surgery.

Surgical exploration of the common bile duct for gallstones is a common operation but carries a high residual stone rate. Conventional techniques for exploring the bile ducts are blind procedures. The surgeon cannot see what he is doing. Also there has been no reliable method for a postexploratory check of the bile ducts before closure, usually around a T-tube. Operative choledochoscopy allows the surgeon to see stones in the duct, may aid the removal of stones and provides visual postexploratory checks that the common bile duct and the hepatic ducts are clear, that papilla is patent and that no stone is left behind before closure. A personal series of 150 patients had operative choledochoscopy using a flexible fibreoptic choledochoscope. If there was a clear indication on preoperative investigations that the ducts should be explored, an operative cholangiogram was omitted and the choledochoscope used as the exploring instrument. In 127 patients with a diagnosis of gallstone disease, choledochoscopy was used at the primary operation. In 12 patients choledochoscopy was used at a secondary operation for recurrent gallstone disease, and 11 patients had malignant obstruction of the biliary tract. In 70 of the 127 patients, gallstones were found and extracted using the choledochoscope. In 53 patients the ducts were clear, and in 4, other lesions were found: 3 papillomas and one polycystic disease. One hundred and six of the patients had the common bile duct closed primarily with no T-tube drainage. There was no increase in complications and no deaths associated with choledochoscopy or primary closure of the common bile duct.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Operative common bile duct imaging by operative cholangiography and flexible choledochoscopy.

A consecutive series of 108 common bile duct (CBD) explorations was studied to examine the efficacy of routine operative cholangiography and flexible choledochoscopy in the identification of choledocholithiasis. CBD exploration was performed according to the findings of routine operative cholangiography. Nine negative explorations were performed, only one of which would have been avoided had selective cholangiography been employed. Eight patients had unsuspected choledocholithiasis that would have been missed if selective operative cholangiography had been used. Flexible choledochoscopy identified CBD stones on 97 occasions; no additional retained stones were found on subsequent T tube cholangiography. In two cases stones were seen but could not be removed; immediate identification allowed planning for early removal. Flexible choledochoscopy is the most effective method of CBD exploration and should be used in all patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.     

腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆总管探查并一期缝合的临床研究

探讨腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆总管探查后进行一期缝合的安全性及临床意义.回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年1月在我院普通外科行腹腔镜胆总管探查手术的患者,按照胆总管的处理方式分为两组,其中一期缝合组(观察组)121例,T管引流组(对照组)153例,观察两组患者在围手术期手术安全性等观察指标间的差异.两组共274例患者均在腹腔...     

腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合41例报告

目的 探讨腹腔镜胆总管切开检查免置T管的可行性及病例选择.方法 选择性地对41例有胆总管探查指征的病人在术中行腹腔镜、胆道镜双镜联合胆总管切开取石后行胆总管一期缝合,回顾性分析其手术的可行性.结果 本组41例全部治愈出院,引流管1～2d拔出.术后发生胆漏1例,术后5d拔出引流管.无胆道狭窄及腹腔感染病例.结论 若术者腹腔镜、胆道镜技术熟练,手术病例选择适当,术中检查仔细,冲洗干净,一期缝合是安全可行的.     

经胆囊管胆道镜胆道探查技术探讨

目的 探讨胆道镜技术在胆总管探查术中的应用。方法 对46例胆道疾病患者，术中胆囊切除后，行经胆囊管胆道镜胆道探查。结果 成功进行肝内胆管，肝胆管，胆总管和壶腹部全部检查的有41例，5例患者仅施行胆总管和壶腹部的检查。46例中有32例自肝内外胆管中取出1－5枚大小不等的结石，患者术后均恢复良好。结论 胆道镜操作简单，易被外科医生掌握，经胆囊管行胆道检查和治疗，可以减轻患者的痛苦，减少医疗费用，减少患者的住院天数，具有推广价值。     

Intrahepatic choledochoscopy during trans-cystic common bile duct exploration; technique, feasibility and value

Background

Transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (TC-LCBDE) is advantageous for exploring the bile duct. Choledochoscopy, however, may be quite challenging to perform transcystically because the cystic duct is usually narrow, duct anatomy may be unfavorable, and not all stones are amenable to transcystic extraction. Convention suggests that it is technically very difficult to visualize the intrahepatic bile ducts with transcystic choledochoscopy, due to the angle of insertion of the cystic into the common bile duct (CBD). However, we have performed intrahepatic choledochoscopy successfully, moving the choledochoscope from the CBD into the common hepatic duct by using what we have termed a “wiper blade maneuver”. The purpose of this study was to confirm how often this was possible.

Methods

A search of a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) and laparoscopic CBD exploration under the care of a single consultant surgeon was performed.

Results

A total of 592 LCBDEs were performed between September 1992 and January 2011; 325 were transcystic explorations. Of these, 72.5?% were female and 56?% were admitted acutely. Exploration and duct clearance was performed by blind Dormia basket trawling in 63?%. The choledochoscope was utilized in 120 cases (37?%). The 3-mm choledochoscope was used in 66 (55?%) and the 5-mm scope in 54 (45?%). Intrahepatic choledochoscopy was performed in 49 patients (40.8?%). Length of surgery was 40–350?min (median 90?min; standard deviation 49?min).

Conclusions

It is technically challenging to perform intrahepatic choledochoscopy with a 3-mm choledochoscope due to its narrow gauge. The more rigid 5-mm scope is thus preferred, but is limited in TCE because its effective use depends on the presence of a dilated cystic duct. Despite the technical limitations of both caliber scopes, we have demonstrated that intrahepatic choledochoscopy during TCE is possible, with each, in 40?% of cases.     

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Surgical Endoscopy -     

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration is gaining favor in the treatment of patients with gallstones and CBD stones. Our aim is to report our results with this procedure, focusing on the technical aspects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with proven CBD stones undergo laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration, preferably, or a choledochotomy if the former is not feasible. According to CBD stone load and diameter, a biliary drainage tube is positioned for postoperative biliary decompression. RESULTS: Among 284 patients who underwent laparoscopic CBD exploration, 4 (1.4%) were converted to open surgery. Transcystic CBD exploration was feasible in 163 cases (58.2%), but a choledochotomy was required in 117 (41.8%). Biliary drains were positioned in 204 patients (72.8%). Minor complications included hyperamylasemia (11; 3.9%) and minor subhepatic bile collection (7; 2.5%). Major complications were bile leakage (5; 1.8%), hemoperitoneum from cystic artery bleeding (2; 0.7%), subhepatic abscess (2; 0.7%), acute pancreatitis (1; 0.3%), and jejunal perforation (1; 0.3%). Retained CBD stones in 15 patients (5.3%) were removed through the biliary drainage sinus tract (8) or after endoscopy and sphincterotomy (6). In one patient, a small stone passed spontaneously (overall success rate 94.6%). Death from a cardiovascular complication was observed in one elderly high-risk patient (0.3%). Recurrent ductal stones in 5 patients (1.8%) were treated with ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy. One patient with re-recurrent ductal stones underwent hepaticojejunostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic CBD exploration during LC in unselected patients solves two problems during the same anesthesia with high success rates (94.6%), low minor (6.4%) and major (3.8%) morbidity rates, and a low mortality rate (0.3%). Standardization of the technique is mandatory to achieve high success rates.     

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

In recent years, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has become the procedure of choice in the management of choledocholithiasis in several laparoscopic centers. The increasing interest for this laparoscopic approach is due to the development of instrumentation and technique, allowing the procedure to be performed safely, and it is also the result of the revised role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which has been questioned because of its cost, risk of complications and effectiveness. Many surgeons, however, are still not familiar with this technique. In this article we discuss the technique and results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Both the laparoscopic transcystic approach and choledochotomy are discussed, together with the results given in the literature. When one considers the costs, morbidity, mortality and the time required before the patient can return to work, it would appear that laparoscopic cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration is more favorable than open surgery or laparoscopic cholecystectomy with preoperative or postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. However, the technique requires advanced laparoscopic skills, including suturing, knot tying, the use of a choledochoscope, guidewire, dilators and balloon stone extractor. Although laparoscopic common bile duct exploration appears to be the most cost-effective method to treat common bile duct stones, it should be emphasized that this procedure is very challenging, and it should be performed by well-trained laparoscopic surgeons with experience in biliary surgery.     

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with high clearance rates, low morbidity, and mortality rates. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: LCBDE is well accepted by patients because treatment is obtained during the same anesthesia. If one stage therapy for gallstones and common bile duct stones provides success rates equivalent to those of the sequential approach, with lower costs, this should be considered the standard of care. METHODS: From September 1991 to March 2007, 5201 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed at S?o José Avaí Hospital. LCBDE was carried out in 481 patients (9.25%). RESULTS: Of 481 LCBDE, 225 (46.78%) were managed using a transcystic approach and 183 (38.05%) with choledochotomy (114 with transcystic choledochotomy and 69 with longitudinal opening of the common bile duct). Successful laparoscopic stone clearance was achieved in 468 (97.3%). An elective postsurgical endoscopic sphincterotomy were done on the 13 (2.70%) patients not cleared laparoscopically. Seven patients had unexpected retained stones. CONCLUSIONS: LCBDE during laparoscopic cholecystectomy solves 2 problems during the same anesthesia with high success rates and may be employed successfully.     

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Background: Herein I describe my >12-year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Methods: From 21 September 1989 through 31 December 2001, 3,580 patients presented with symptomatic biliary tract disease. Laparoscopic cholecystecomy (LC) was attempted in 3,544 of them (99.1%) and completed in 3,527 (99.5%). Laparoscopic cholangiograms (IOC) were performed in 3,417 patients (96.4%); in 344 cases (9.7%), the IOC was abnormal. Forty-nine patients (1.4%) underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and 33 patients (0.9%) underwent postoperative ERCP. LCBDE was attempted in 326 cases and completed in 321 (98.5%). It was successful in clearing the duct in 317 of the 344 patients with abnormal cholangiograms (92.2%). Results: The mean operating time for all patients undergoing LC with or without cholangiograms or LCBDE or other additional surgery was 56.9 min. Mean length of stay was 22.1 h. The mean operating time for LC only patients (n = 2530)—that is, those not undergoing LCBDE or any other additional procedure—was 47.6 min; their mean postoperative length of stay was 17.2 h. Ductal exploration was performed via the cystic duct in 269 patients, (82.5%) and through a choledochotomy in 57 patients (17.5%). T-tubes were used in patients in whom there was concern for possible retained debris or stones, distal spasm, pancreatitis, or general poor tissue quality secondary to malnutrition or infection. In cases where choledochotomy was used, a T-tube was placed in 38 patients (67%), and primary closure without a T-tube was done in 19 (33%). There were no complications in the group of patients who underwent choledochotomy and primary ductal closure without T-tube placement or in the group in whom T-tubes were placed. Conclusions: Common bile duct (CBD) stones still occur in 10% of patients. These stones are identified by IOC. IOC can be performed in >96.4% of cases of LC. LCBDE was successful in clearing these stones in 97.2% of patients in whom it was attempted and in 92.2% of all patients with normal IOCs. Most LCBDEs in this series were performed via the cystic duct because of the stone characteristics and ductal anatomy. Selective laparoscopic placement of T-tubes in patients requiring choledochotomy (67%) appears to be a safe and effective alternative to routine T-tube drainage of the ductal system. ERCP, which was required for 5.8% of patients with abnormal cholangiograms, and open CBDE, which was used in 2.0%, still play an important role in the management of common bile duct pathology. The role of ERCP, with or without sphincterotomy, has returned to its status in the prelaparoscopic era. LCBDE may be employed successfully in the vast majority of patients harboring CBD stones.     

腹腔镜下胆总管切开探查在胆管结石中的应用

目的 :总结腹腔镜下胆总管切开探查取石术的临床应用经验 ,探讨其手术方法 ,术中注意事项及临床应用的优缺点。方法 :腹腔镜下胆总管切开取石 ,T管引流或一期缝合。结果 :2 3例胆总管结石手术2 1例成功 ,2例中转开腹。结论 :腹腔镜下胆总管切开取石术应掌握适应证 ,才能使创伤减小 ,康复快且安全。     

Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration

The modern era of common bile duct (CBD) surgery started with Mirizzi, who introduced intraoperative cholangiography in 1932. Intraoperative choledoscopy had been developed as an adjunctive to intraoperative cholangiography, which helped to detect CBD stones in an additional 10% to 15% of instances that otherwise would have been missed. Findings have shown choledochoscopy to be an important technique for efficient and effective management of CBD stones. Efforts to treat patients with common duct stones in one session and to avoid the potential complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy resulted in several laparoscopic transcystic CBD (LTCBDE) techniques. The techniques of transcystic stone extraction include lavage, trolling with wire baskets or biliary balloon catheters, cystic duct dilation, biliary endoscopy, and stone retrieval with wire baskets under direct vision and antegrade sphincterotomy, lithotripsy, and catheter techniques. The indications for LTCBDE are filling or equivocal defects at cholangiography, stones smaller than 10 mm, fewer than 9 stones, and possible tumor. The contraindications are stones larger than 1 cm, stones proximal to the cystic duct entrance into the CBD, small friable cystic duct, and 10 or more stones. Experience with LTCBDE shows that the approach is applicable in more than 85% of cases, with a success rate of 85% to 95%. It also is shown to be more cost effective than postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Recent developments in LTCBDE have focused mainly on implementation of robotically assisted surgery and new imaging methods such as magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional virtual cholangioscopy and three-dimensional ultrasound. Further technological advances will facilitate the application of laparoscopic approaches to the common duct, which should become the primary strategy for the great majority of patients.