Deep venous thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution

PURPOSE: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the greater saphenous vein (GSV; "closure") is a relatively new option for treatment of venous reflux. However, our initial enthusiasm for this minimally invasive technique has been tempered by our preliminary experience with its potentially lethal complication, deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: Seventy-three lower extremities were treated in 66 patients with GSV reflux, between April 2003 and February 2004. There were 48 (73%) female patients and 18 (27%) male patients, with ages ranging from 26 to 88 years (mean, 62 +/- 14 years). RFA was combined with stab avulsion of varicosities in 55 (75%) patients and subfascial ligation of perforator veins in 6 (8%) patients. An ATL HDI 5000 scanner with linear 7-4 MHz probe and the SonoCT feature was used for GSV mapping and procedure guidance in all procedures. GSV diameter determined the size of the RFA catheter used. Veins less than 8 mm in diameter were treated with a 6F catheter (n = 54); an 8F catheter was used for veins greater than 8 mm in diameter (n = 19). The GSV was cannulated at the knee level. The tip of the catheter was positioned within 1 cm of the origin of the inferior epigastric vein (first GSV tributary). All procedures were carried out according to manufacturer guidelines. RESULTS: All patients underwent venous duplex ultrasound scanning 2 to 30 days (mean, 10 +/- 6 days) after the procedure. The duplex scans documented occlusion of the GSV in 70 limbs (96%). In addition, DVT was found in 12 limbs (16%). Eleven patients (92%) had an extension of the occlusive clot filling the treated proximal GSV segment, with a floating tail beyond the patent inferior epigastric vein into the common femoral vein. Another patient developed acute occlusive clots in the calf muscle (gastrocnemius) veins. Eight patients were readmitted and received anticoagulation therapy. Four patients were treated with enoxaparin on an ambulatory basis. None of these patients had pulmonary embolism. Initially 3 patients with floating common femoral vein clots underwent inferior vena cava filter placement. Of the 19 limbs treated with the 8F RFA catheter, GSV clot extension developed in 5 (26%), compared with 7 of 54 (13%) limbs treated with the 6F RFA catheter (P =.3). No difference was found between the occurrence of DVT in patients who underwent the combined procedure (RFA and varicose vein excision) compared with patients who underwent GSV RFA alone (P =.7). No statistically significant differences were found in age or gender of patients with or without postoperative DVT (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent combined GSV RFA and varicose vein excision did not demonstrate a higher occurrence of postoperative DVT compared with patients who underwent RFA alone. Early postoperative duplex scans are essential, and should be mandatory in all patients undergoing RFA of the GSV.     

Endovascular laser ablation of the greater saphenous vein for varicose veins: our initial experience

Laser treatment of primary varicose veins of the legs is a new mini-invasive technique which represent an alternative to the safenectomy. Endovascular laser treatment is based on the employ of laser to destroying the vascular wall and inducing fibrosis. This technique is not without complications: burns, paraesthesias, haematomas, but most of all disappear in few days. Encouraged by the promising results reported in literature, we have performed 18 laser ablation of greater saphenous vein since 2003 till today. Our patients had a good post-operative course and a follow up without troubles (3-17 months). We think that laser treatment is effective in the treatment of the primary varicose veins of the legs. It requests attention and experience in dosing the laser energy for minimizing the complications. Today there isn't long term follow up in literature.     

大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术后深静脉血栓形成12例分析

目的 探讨大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术后深静脉血栓形成(deep venous thrombosis,DVT)的临床特点、病因及预防措施.方法 回顾性分析收治的12例行大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术后合并DVT患者的临床特点及诊疗方法,并讨论病因及预防措施.结果 12例DVT患者中7例为中央型,2例为周围型,3例为混合型.DVT合并肺栓塞2例.10例中央型和混合型DVT的肢体增粗症状严重,肢围差距均＞5 cm.9例行下腔静脉滤器(inferior vena cava filter,(IV)CF)保护下的腘静脉置管溶栓术( catheter-directed thrombolysis,CDT)治疗,其中l例介入造影过程中发现左股静脉突然中断,中转手术行股静脉探查修复术、CDT及髂静脉支架植入术;8例发现左髂静脉压迫综合征的影像学表现,其中6例在CDT治疗后行髂静脉支架植入术.1例结合术前彩超及造影所见考虑为右大隐静脉残端血栓蔓延至股静脉,行股静脉切开取栓治疗.2例周围型DVT行抗凝为主的综合性药物治疗.本组12例DVT患者均取得较好的近期疗效.结论 手术损伤股静脉、大隐静脉残端过长、左髂静脉压迫综合征是大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术后DVT的临床常见原因.术前明确下肢慢性静脉功能不全的病变类型、术中仔细操作、术后早期下床活动至关重要.     

Portal vein thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) deserves multidisciplinary treatment in addition to surgical resection. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an evolving, localized, thermal ablative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Though the preliminary results of RFA in clinical studies are encouraging, its serious complications should not be underestimated. Portal vein thrombosis as a result of direct blood vessel injury by RFA is rarely reported and is potentially fatal in patients with limited liver reserve due to underlying liver cirrhosis. We present a case of portal vein thrombosis as a complication of RFA treatment for recurrent HCC and illustrate its underlying possible mechanism.     

Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of saphenous varicose veins

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) are minimal invasive methods to treat saphenous varicose veins. The short- and mid-term results are excellent with an occlusion rate for RFA of almost 90% after 5 years and about 95% for EVLT after 2 years. Severe side effects are rare in both cases. Prospective randomised comparative studies are available for RFA and surgery showing comparable short-term results and superiority of RFA concerning short-term quality of life outcome. For laser treatment no prospective randomised comparative studies are available. Endovenous treatment is only a part of the complex treatment concept of varicose veins. Insufficient tributaries have to be treated in addition. The fact that the insufficient saphenous vein is treated without high ligation seems not to influence the short-term and mid-term recurrence rates. More prospective randomised comparative studies comparing endovenous treatment and surgery or foam sclerotherapy are necessary to decide which method is the best for which patient.     

腔内射频消融治疗下肢静脉曲张后静脉内热诱导血栓形成患者的临床特征及其治疗情况

目的 探讨射频消融术(RFA)治疗下肢静脉曲张后静脉内热诱导血栓形成(EHIT)患者的临床特征及其治疗情况.方法 选取2019年9月至2020年9月于首都医科大学宣武医院341例因下肢静脉曲张接受RFA治疗的患者,统计RFA术后出现EHIT的患者,分析其临床特征、大隐静脉直径、Carprini评分、治疗方式及预后情况....     

Delayed portal vein thrombosis after experimental radiofrequency ablation near the main portal vein

BACKGROUND: Portal venous blood flow may protect adjacent tumour cells from thermal destruction with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This study aimed to investigate the local effect of RFA on the main portal vein branch, and the completeness of cellular ablation in its vicinity, with or without a Pringle manoeuvre using a porcine model. METHODS: This was an in vivo study on 23 domestic pigs. RFA using a cooled-tip electrode was performed 5 mm from the left main portal vein branch under ultrasonographic guidance for 12 min with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) a Pringle manoeuvre. Ten pigs were killed 4 h after the procedure to study the early effects of RFA and ten others were killed 1 week later to determine any delayed effect. As a control, sham operations with a Pringle manoeuvre for 12 min were performed on three pigs. The flow velocity changes of portal vein and hepatic artery were measured using Doppler ultrasonography, and the completeness of cellular ablation around the portal vein was assessed qualitatively by histochemical staining and quantitatively by measuring intracellular levels of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP). RESULTS: In the absence of the Pringle manoeuvre, there was no significant change in mean(s.d.) portal vein flow velocity before RFA (20.0(3.5) cm/s) and at 4 h (18.5(2.5) cm/s) (P = 0.210) and 1 week (19.5(2.2) cm/s) (P = 0.500) after the procedure. Gross and histological examination of the portal vein branches showed no damage without the Pringle manoeuvre. In all pigs that underwent RFA with a Pringle manoeuvre, the portal vein was occluded 1 week after the operation; histological examination of the affected portal vein showed severe thermal injury and associated venous thrombosis. The local effect of RFA on the hepatic artery was similar. With intact portal blood flow during RFA, complete ablation of liver tissue around the pedicle was demonstrated by histochemical staining and measurement of the intracellular ATP concentration. CONCLUSION: RFA was safe when applied close to the main portal vein branch without a Pringle manoeuvre, with complete cellular destruction. Use of the Pringle manoeuvre resulted in delayed portal vein and hepatic artery thrombosis and injury to the hepatic artery and bile duct.     

Ultrasound findings after radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: descriptive analysis

OBJECTIVE: As an emerging endovascular alternative to ligation and stripping of the incompetent greater saphenous vein (GSV), radiofrequency ablation was monitored with ultrasound scanning to evaluate anatomic results. Neovascularization and inflammation are potential consequences that lead to the appearance of small vessels. The natural history of the below-knee untreated GSV segment may be important in our understanding of ongoing chronic venous disease. An ultrasound follow-up study was conducted to determine the prevalence of small vessel networks, defined as veins and arteries less than 2 mm in diameter, adjacent to the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ); prevalence of small vessel networks adjacent to the treated GSV in the thigh; and fate of the below-knee untreated GSV distal to the ablated segment. METHODS: One hundred six extremities with radiofrequency ablation of the GSV for treatment of superficial venous insufficiency were followed up with high-resolution ultrasound imaging 4 to 25 months (median, 9 months) after the procedure. Ninety-three limbs had concomitant ligation and division of the SFJ and its tributaries, and 13 limbs underwent radiofrequency ablation without SFJ ligation. Ultrasound was used to evaluate patients for small vessel networks, and concomitant findings of small vessel networks and recanalization at the SFJ and adjacent to the treated GSV. The status of the below-knee segment of untreated GSV was evaluated for patency and reflux. Data analysis compared the findings in the ligation group with those in the no-ligation group, with the chi 2 test and Fisher exact test. RESULTS: We found small vessel networks in 65% (n = 69) of extremities: 15% (n = 16) at the SFJ only, 26% (n = 28) in the thigh only, and 24% (n = 25) at both the SFJ and thigh, resulting in a small vessel network prevalence of 39% (n = 41) at the SJF and 50% (n = 53) in the thigh. The prevalence of small vessel networks at the SFJ was significantly less after radiofrequency ablation with SFJ ligation (34%, 32 of 93) than after radiofrequency ablation without ligation (69%, 9 of 13; P = .035). Small vessel networks and GSV recanalization at the SFJ was more common in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation without ligation (46%, 6 of 13) than after radiofrequency ablation with ligation (14%, 13 of 93; P = .014). The prevalence of small vessel networks in the thigh was not affected by SFJ ligation. The below-knee GSV was patent in 79% (84 of 106), and 58% (61 of 106) demonstrated reflux, a decrease from the pre-radiofrequency ablation rate of 71% (75 of 106), possibly because thrombosis extended distally beyond the ablated segment in 16% (17 of 106) of the legs. CONCLUSIONS: Small vessel networks were detected adjacent to or in connection with most of the radiofrequency ablation-treated GSVs. SFJ ligation was associated with fewer small vessel networks and proximal GSV recanalization. Most below-knee untreated GSV segments remained patent, and most exhibited reflux.     

静脉内射频消融术与激光消融术治疗大隐静脉曲张的比较

目的 比较静脉内射频消融术和激光消融术治疗大隐静脉曲张的安全性和有效性.方法 回顾性分析2018年4～12月接受静脉内射频和激光消融术治疗的80例大隐静脉曲张患者临床资料,其中射频组39例,激光组41例.比较两种方法的手术并发症发生率、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、静脉临床...     

Incidence of deep vein thrombosis after varicose vein surgery

BACKGROUND: Varicose vein surgery is generally considered to have little risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This prospective study examined the incidence of DVT in patients undergoing varicose vein surgery. METHODS: Lower leg veins were assessed before operation by duplex ultrasonography in 377 patients, and reassessed 2-4 weeks after surgery, and again at 6 and 12 months. Patients were instructed to contact a physician if symptoms consistent with DVT occurred before the scheduled follow-up appointment. Preoperative prophylaxis (a single dose of subcutaneous heparin) was left to the discretion of the vascular surgeon. RESULTS: DVT was detected in 20 (5.3 per cent) of the 377 patients. Of these, only eight were symptomatic and no patient developed symptoms consistent with pulmonary embolus. Eighteen of the 20 DVTs were confined to the calf veins. Subcutaneous heparin did not alter the outcome. No propagation of thrombus was observed and half of the DVTs had resolved without deep venous reflux at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The incidence of DVT following varicose vein surgery was higher than previously thought, but these DVTs had minimal short- or long-term clinical significance.     

射频消融治疗下肢静脉曲张的并发症探讨及预防策略分析

目的 总结下肢静脉曲张射频消融治疗后的并发症发生情况,并分析其预防策略。方法 收集2019年1月至2020年12月于西安交通大学第一附属医院进行射频消融治疗的617例下肢静脉曲张患者临床资料。于术后1周、1个月、3个月、6个月进行随访,观察所有患者术后患肢并发症的发生情况,包括皮下瘀血、血栓性静脉炎、色素沉着、皮肤烧伤、压力性水泡、隐神经损伤、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞。结果 术后,所有下肢静脉曲张患者的并发症均以皮下瘀血、色素沉着和血栓性浅静脉炎为主。术后1周,出现深静脉血栓4例,包括腘静脉血栓1例,肌间静脉血栓3例。无严重肺栓塞、隐神经损伤发生。皮下瘀血、血栓性浅静脉炎均于术后6个月时完全吸收;色素沉着吸收缓慢,术后6个月时,仍有5例患者存在色素沉着。结论 下肢静脉曲张患者经射频消融治疗后无严重并发症发生,常见并发症为皮下瘀血、色素沉着、血栓性浅静脉炎。选择合适的病例,采取适宜的规避技巧,以及进行规范化的培训可以减少下肢静脉曲张患者术后并发症的发生。     

Neovascularization after great saphenous vein ablation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, distribution, and flow characteristics of intraluminal neovascularization in patients undergoing great saphenous vein (GSV) endovenous laser (EVLT) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: Duplex ultrasound (DU) was performed in patients undergoing EVLT or RFA before, during, and after their procedures. Follow-up included assessment for deep venous thrombosis and obliteration. When new vessels were identified, the source, extent, direction, and location of flow were noted. Flow channel diameters were measured and the resistivity index (RI) was used to characterize the flow patterns. RESULTS: A total of 102 venous ablations were performed of which 46 were RFA, and 56 EVLT. Arterio-venous fistulae (AVF) were found in five patients that were not identified by DU prior to intervention. Involved segments had variable length and multiple channels (mean diameter 2.2mm). No patient had local or systemic symptoms related to the AVF. The mean RI was 0.42, consistent with an AVF. The perivenous arteries feeding the AVF had enhanced flow but a significantly higher RI (0.63, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Multiple small vessels were found directly adjacent to the involved vein segments forming small AVF within the obliterated vein. The prevalence of AVF in the ablated GSV was 5%. This process may be responsible for recanalization or recurrence after endovenous ablation procedures.     

Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein may avert phlebectomy for branch varicose veins

BACKGROUND: Endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) may be performed simultaneously with stab phlebectomy of branch varicose veins or as a stand-alone procedure. A clinical approach of performing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) alone as initial treatment for varicose veins was reviewed. METHODS: Patients with duplex ultrasound-documented reflux in the GSV and CEAP clinical stage 2 to 6 were selected for RFA. Patients were examined within a week preoperatively with duplex ultrasound imaging. Patients were seen within a week postoperatively and again at 2 to 3 months to ascertain if further treatment was required. A retrospective review of the initial 184 procedures in a series from June 2002 through February 2005 was performed, allowing for a 9-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Three procedures were performed under general anesthesia and 181 with intravenous sedation and tumescent anesthesia. Postoperative duplex scans showed total occlusion or partial patency of <10 cm in 155 limbs. Seven (4.5%) had concomitant stab phlebectomy, seven subsequently had sclerotherapy, and 39 (25.2%) underwent subsequent stab phlebectomy of persistent symptomatic varicosities. In 101 limbs (65.1%), symptoms resolved and had no further therapy, and 24 limbs had a GSV that was patent for >10 cm on postoperative duplex imaging. Nine limbs had no further therapy (37.5%), eight (33.3%) had subsequent stab phlebectomy, and three had stripping of the GSV and stab phlebectomy. Four limbs had a redo RFA, four limbs had an aborted RFA procedure, and one limb was lost to follow-up. Failure of total GSV occlusion was more often associated with use of a 6F catheter. Complications were generally mild, and there was no postoperative deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION: Endovenous ablation of the GSV can be performed safely and effectively as the initial treatment for lower extremity varicose veins. Because most patients show clinical improvement after RFA, an algorithm of reassessment of the limb and branch varicose veins several months post-RFA allows most patients to defer stab phlebectomy.     

日间手术模式下腔内射频消融术与静脉剥脱导管主干剥脱术治疗大隐静脉曲张疗效比较

目的 比较日间手术模式下大隐静脉腔内射频消融术与静脉剥脱导管主干剥脱治疗大隐静脉曲张的安全性及有效性.方法 收集2020年2月至2021年1月大连市金州区第一人民医院收治的84例行日间手术的大隐静脉曲张患者的临床资料,根据手术方式的不同将患者分为射频组(n=44,采用大隐静脉主干射频消融术+小腿浅表静脉泡沫硬化+部分小...