Differentiation of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors by their selective inhibition of ACE in physiologically important target organs

Seven ACE inhibitors were studied for possible differences in distribution to aorta, brain, heart, lung, and kidney after administration of single oral doses to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Doses, normalized for differences in inhibitory potency and molecular weight, were expected to deliver equivalent levels of ACE-inhibitory activity to the circulation, and this was confirmed by preliminary dose-response studies. The relative potencies of the active moieties of the seven drugs and the normalized oral doses used were: SQ 29,852 (1.0), 100 mg/kg; captopril (3.5), 30 mg/kg; enalapril (12), 20 mg/kg; fosinopril (13), 25 mg/kg; zofenopril (20), 10 mg/kg; lisinopril (24), 10 mg/kg; and ramipril (51), 5 mg/kg. In these ex vivo studies, ACE activities were determined fluorometrically in SHR sera and in uncentrifuged homogenates of the solid tissues at various times after oral dosing with the ACE inhibitors. As expected, the normalized oral doses of the seven inhibitors had equivalent effects on serum ACE. In lung, where ACE has a vascular endothelial localization, and in aorta, where ACE inhibition correlates with antihypertensive action, ramipril, lisinopril, and zofenopril were distinguished by the magnitude and duration (three to four days) of their effects. In the brain, where ACE may affect central regulation of blood pressure and participate in the degradation of certain neuropeptides, ramipril and enalapril had no effect; captopril and zofenopril had modest, short-lasting effects, and fosinopril, lisinopril, and SQ 29,852 had delayed but long-lasting inhibitory actions. In the kidney, where ACE inhibition may have positive or negative effects on renal function, ramipril and fosinopril could be distinguished by their weak actions, perhaps associated with biliary routes of excretion. In the heart, where ACE inhibitors may prevent ischemic damage to the myocardium, single oral doses of captopril, fosinopril, and particularly zofenopril produced striking and long-lasting inhibition, whereas equivalent doses of ramipril and enalapril produced barely detectable inhibition.     

Effects of diuretic treatment on cardiac and circulating RAS in chronic heart failure post-myocardial infarction in rats

BACKGROUND: Cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is activated by an increase in wall stress and is involved in remodeling processes. Heart failure is often treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics although diuretic treatment could activate the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). AIMS: To examine the effects of diuretic treatment on cardiac and circulating RAS in post-infarction chronic heart failure. METHODS: Myocardial infarction was produced by coronary artery ligation in spontaneously hypertensive rats. The rats were randomly assigned to receive either ramipril (1 mg/kg/day), furosemide (4 mg/kg/day), or combination therapy for 6 weeks, commencing 2 weeks after infarction. RESULTS: All three treatment protocols equivalently attenuated reactive hypertrophy of the right ventricle and ventricular septum and improved left ventricular systolic function. Both cardiac ACE mRNA and activity were significantly increased in untreated rats. This increase was attenuated by both ramipril and furosemide and further depressed by the combination. The increase in activity was completely inhibited by either agent alone. Plasma renin activity was upregulated by ramipril or ramipril plus furosemide but not influenced by infarction or furosemide alone. CONCLUSIONS: Furosemide and ramipril significantly reduced cardiac ACE and remodeling. Diuretics work favorably and do not interfere with the effects of ACE inhibitors. Possibly, a reduction in wall stress due to decreased volume overload accounts for the effects of diuretics on cardiac ACE in the treatment of post-infarction remodeling in hypertensive hearts. These data suggest a new mechanism for the frequently observed beneficial effect of diuretics in heart failure.     

RNA干扰血管紧张素转换酶对自发性高血压大鼠血压及心肌重构的影响

目的 用RNA干扰技术下调血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)表达,观察其对自发性高血压大鼠血压及心肌重构的影响.方法 自发性高血压大鼠随机分为3组,即空白对照组(尾静脉注射生理盐水),病毒对照组(尾静脉注射对照腺病毒),治疗组[尾静脉注射表达ACE基因特异性短发夹RNA(shRNA)的重组腺病毒载体],同时设WKY正常血压对照组.以上各组大鼠均于实验的第1、16天各注射1次.干预前后检测尾动脉压的变化.于首次注射后第3天,用RT-PCR及Western blot法检测心肌、主动脉组织中ACE mRNA及蛋白的表达,ELISA法检测血清中ACE的含量.实验结束时,检测左心重/体重及心肌胶原蛋白的含量,并用透射电镜观察心肌超微结构的变化.结果 治疗组于每次注射后,尾动脉压均明显下降22 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)左右,单次注射后降压作用至少可持续14 d,累积降压幅度达38 mm Hg左右,而空白对照和病毒对照组血压则持续升高.治疗组心肌、主动脉组织中ACE mRNA及蛋白表达明显低于空白对照组和病毒对照组(P＜0.05),而与WKY组比较差异无统计学意义.治疗组血清ACE含量(16.37±3.90)ng/ml也明显低于空白对照组(48.26±1.50)ng/ml和病毒对照组(46.67±2.82)ng/ml,P＜0.05,而与WKY组(14.88±3.15)ng/ml比较差异无统计学意义.治疗组左心重/体重与心肌胶原蛋白含量[2.24±0.19与(1.283±0.019)μg/mg]明显低于空白对照组[3.21±0.13与(1.686±0.013)μg/mg]和病毒对照组[3.13±0.12与(1.682±0.009)μg/mg],P均＜0.05,但还未降到WKY组水平[2.06±0.11与(1.257±0.019)μg/mg].电镜观察显示治疗组心肌超微结构得到了明显改善.结论 RNA干扰可有效下调ACE表达,降低自发性高血压大鼠血压,改善心肌重构.RNA干扰有望成为高血压病基因治疗的新方法.     

Mibefradil prevents L-NAME-exacerbated nephrosclerosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential renal protective effects of a novel calcium channel blocker mibefradil in chronic renal failure. METHOD: We compared the long-term effects of mibefradil with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril on blood pressure, proteinuria, renal function and histological alterations in N-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME)-treated spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Three groups of SHR were studied for 45 days: group 1 (n = 14), treated with L-NAME only (50 mg/l in the drinking water); group 2 (n = 15) L-NAME plus co-treatment with mibefradil (30 mg/kg per day); group 3 (n = 15), L-NAME plus co-treatment with cilazapril (10 mg/kg per day). RESULTS: Both mibefradil and cilazapril attenuated the increased systolic blood pressure, and prevented the development of proteinuria and the decreased creatinine clearance (Ccr) seen at day 42 in the group treated with L-NAME alone. Notably, mibefradil had similar effects to cilazapril on proteinuria and Ccr, despite a reduced antihypertensive effect All animals receiving mibefradil co-treatment remained alive throughout the experiment, whereas the mortality rate was 43% in SHR treated with L-NAME alone. Both mibefradil and cilazapril completely prevented renal structural damage as assessed by scoring glomerular, tubulo-interstitial and vascular lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that mibefradil prevented the development of hypertension and proteinuria, renal functional impairment and nephrosclerosis, and also improved animal survival. The renal protective effects of mibefradil were at least equivalent to those of an ACE inhibitor in this animal model of chronic renal failure.     

Angiotensin II type 2 receptor blockade partially negates antihypertrophic effects of type 1 receptor blockade on pressure-overload rat cardiac hypertrophy.

We investigated the effects of angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor blockade on the antihypertrophic effects of type 1 receptor (AT1) blockade in pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy in adult rats. Cardiac hypertrophy was induced by banding the abdominal aorta above the renal arteries. The rats were treated with either an AT1 receptor antagonist TCV-116 (TCV, 10 mg/kg/day), an AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 (PD, 20 mg/kg/day), or both for 4 weeks after the aortic banding. We measured systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), body weight (BW), left ventricular weight (LVW), and serum and cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activities. Aortic banding increased BP and LVW/BW, and TCV reversed both these increases. PD affected neither BP nor LVW/BW. TCV+PD reversed the increase in BP but not LVW/BW. Thus, PD was considered to counteract the antihypertrophic effect of TCV without affecting BP. All three treatments reduced cardiac ACE activity without affecting serum ACE activity. Our data demonstrated that AT2 receptor blockade negates the antihypertrophic effects of AT1 receptor blockade in an adult rat model of pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy. AT2 receptors may mediate the signaling pathways involved in growth inhibition, which could counteract mediation of the cellular growth signaling pathways by AT1 receptors.     

Reversal of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis by S21402, a dual inhibitor of neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin converting enzyme in SHRs

OBJECTIVE: The major advantage of dual inhibitors of neutral endopeptidase (NEP) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is their ability to lower blood pressure irrespective of renin or volume status. The aim of this study was to determine whether dual NEP/ACE inhibition produces different effects on cardiovascular structure and fibrosis, hormonal parameters and inhibition of tissue enzymes compared with selective inhibition of ACE and NEP in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). METHODS: Male SHRs received the dual NEP/ACE inhibitor (S21402, 100 mg/kg per day), the ACE inhibitor (captopril, 50 mg/kg per day), the NEP inhibitor (SCH42495, 60 mg/kg per day) or vehicle for 2 weeks. RESULTS: S21402 produced equivalent blood pressure lowering effects to captopril (vehicle, 220 +/- 1 mmHg; S21402, 189 +/- 2 mmHg; captopril, 187 +/- 3 mmHg), but was a more effective antihypertensive agent than SCH42495 (214 +/- 2 mmHg, P< 0.01). All treatments reduced left ventricular mass (P< 0.05) and cardiac fibrosis (P< 0.01). S21402 inhibited renal NEP and ACE (P< 0.01), SCH42495 inhibited renal NEP (P < 0.01), and captopril inhibited renal ACE (P< 0.01). Captopril and S21402 increased plasma renin activity (P< 0.05), but the rise with S21402 was attenuated compared with that caused by captopril (P< 0.01). All treatments reduced plasma aldosterone levels (P< 0.01), and NEP inhibition with SCH42495 and S21402 increased plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP; P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that selective NEP inhibition has major benefits in the regression of cardiac hypertrophy and reduction of fibrosis but has limited antihypertensive effects. The dual NEP/ACE inhibitor S21402 offered no advantage over the selective ACE inhibitor in terms of blood pressure reduction, or attenuation of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, but did increase plasma ANP and blunted the reactive rise in renin with ACE inhibition. Further studies are needed to determine whether more complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with dual NEP/ACE inhibition results in additional benefits in terms of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular disease.     

Long-acting Ca2+ blockers prevent myocardial remodeling induced by chronic NO inhibition in rats

Chronic inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis induces cardiac remodeling independent of systemic hemodynamic changes in rats. We examined whether long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers block myocardial remodeling and whether the activation of 70-kDa S6 kinase (p70S6K) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) are involved. Ten groups of Wistar-Kyoto rats underwent 8 weeks of drug treatment consisting of a combination of NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inactive isomer (D-NAME), amlodipine (1 or 3 mg/kg per day), or benidipine (3 or 10 mg/kg per day). In other groups, L-NAME was also used in combination with a p70S6K inhibitor (rapamycin), a MEK inhibitor (PD98059), and hydralazine. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate, and left ventricular weight (LVW) were measured, together with histological examinations and kinase assay. L-NAME increased SBP and LVW (1048+/-22 versus 780+/-18 mg, P<0.01) compared with the control, showing a significant increase in cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes after 8 weeks. Amlodipine, benidipine, or hydralazine equally attenuated the increase in SBP induced by L-NAME. However, both amlodipine and benidipine but not hydralazine attenuated the increase in LVW by L-NAME (789+/-27, 825+/-20 mg, P<0.01, and 1118+/-29 mg, NS, respectively), also confirmed by histological analysis. L-NAME caused a 2.2-fold/1.8-fold increase in p70S6K/ERK activity in myocardium compared with the control, both of which were attenuated by both amlodipine and benidipine but not hydralazine. Both rapamycin and PD98059 attenuated cardiac hypertrophy in this model. Thus, long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers inhibited cardiac hypertrophy induced by chronic inhibition of NO synthesis by inhibiting both p70S6K and ERK in vivo.     

Regression of ventricular and vascular hypertrophy: are there differences between structurally different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors?

OBJECTIVES: It is well established that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEI) reduce blood pressure (BP) and hypertrophy of the left ventricle and vessels. The aim of our study was to compare chemically different ACEIs regarding their ability to modulate left ventricular and media hypertrophy, ACE activity and plasma endothelin-1 concentrations in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). DESIGN: After establishing equi-effective dose regimes, SHRs were treated (3 months) with captopril, enalapril, fosinopril or ramipril (2 x 25, 10, 20 or 1 mg/kg per day or corresponding 1% doses for studying blood pressure-independent effects). METHODS AND RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure was reduced in SHRs receiving high doses of captopril, enalapril, fosinopril or ramipril (-61, -54, -35 and -47 mmHg), whereas low doses were ineffective. Left ventricular weight was decreased in animals treated with high doses (captopril/enalapril/fosinopril/ramipril: -17/-19/-17/-19%), but not low doses of agents. Media thickness of thoracal aorta was reduced by administering high doses (captopril/enalapril/fosinopril/ramipril: -31/-32/-27/-26%) and low doses (-16/-22/-22/-19%) of agents. ACE activity was reduced in heart, aorta and kidney of rats treated with high and low doses of all ACE inhibitors, whereby high doses showed more pronounced effects. Plasma endothelin-1 concentrations were not altered. A blood-pressure-ineffective treatment with an AT -antagonist revealed similar effects on cardiovascular hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: ACEIs reduce cardiovascular hypertrophy uniformly via an AT -receptor- mediated mechanism, reinforcing the opinion that ACEI effects are indeed class effects. The significance of local renin-angiotensin systems was confirmed by antihypertrophic effects in the aorta that were apparent in the absence of any blood pressure reduction.     

Differential effects of olmesartan and ramipril on inflammatory response after myocardial infarction in rats

This study compares the effect of two different strategies to inhibit the renin-angiotensin system in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Male Wistar rats were treated with placebo, the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril (1 mg/kg/day), or the AT1 receptor antagonist, olmesartan (1 mg/kg/day), both initiated 1 week before induction of MI and continued for 6 weeks after MI. The inflammatory reaction in the heart was investigated 7 days post-MI by determination of macrophage infiltration and the expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha), interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-6 at mRNA and protein levels. Six weeks post-MI, cardiac function was measured following chronic implantation of catheters in the LV and femoral artery, and cardiac morphology and coronary structure were investigated in picrosirius-red stained hearts. In placebo-treated rats, macrophage infiltration was accompanied by upregulation of IL-1beta and IL-6 mRNA in the peri-infarct zone. TNF-alpha and IL-1beta mRNA and protein were also upregulated in the non-infarcted myocardium. Whereas both treatment regimes significantly reduced IL-6 upregulation, olmesartan additionally reduced macrophage infiltration and IL-1beta expression. Six weeks post-MI, placebo-treated MI animals developed an impaired cardiac function with structural remodeling of the myocardium and coronaries. While olmesartan and ramipril both improved cardiac function and reduced infarct size and myocardial/coronary remodeling, olmesartan was more effective not only in increasing vascular perimeter, inner vascular diameter and septal thickness but also in lowering media thickness of coronary arteries, inner left ventricular diameter, left ventricular circumference and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure than ramipril. Thus, following MI the AT1 receptor blocker, olmesartan, attenuated cardiac inflammatory reactions and protected myocardial/coronary structure and function of the failing heart proving to be of similar, in some cases superior effectiveness in this respect than the ACE inhibitor, ramipril.     

Effect of long-term ACE inhibition on myocardial tissue in hypertensive stroke-prone rats.

The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of long-term ACE inhibition with ramipril on myocardial hypertrophy and its molecular background in spontaneously hypertensive stroke-prone rats (SHR-SP). Therefore, 1-month-old pre-hypertensive SHR-SP were randomized into three groups and exposed lifelong via drinking water to 1 mg/kg/day ramipril (anti-hypertensive dose, RHI), 10 micrograms/kg/day ramipril (non-anti-hypertensive dose, RLO) or placebo. After 15 months cardiac tissue was collected from ten rats each for immunohistochemistry and Northern blot analysis of structural proteins, proteins of the extracellular matrix and several growth factors. Results showed that RHI, but not RLO, treatment prevented development of myocyte hypertrophy (ANP). Furthermore, unlike placebo-treated rats, the ramipril-treated animals had no evidence of degeneration and loss of structural proteins (alpha -actinin), inflammatory infiltrates (CD45) and deposition of extracellular matrix proteins (collagen, fibronectin, vimentin). Only in RHI-treated animals, mRNA levels for TGF- beta(1)as well as of collagen alpha(1)(I) and fibronectin were downregulated compared to placebo-treated animals. In contrast, VEGF mRNA levels increased significantly in both groups of ramipril-treated animals v. placebo-treated SHR-SP. Thus, the reported life prolonging effect of high doses of ramipril which is associated with prevention of hypertension and hypertrophy is accompanied by prevention of the development of necrosis and fibrosis. The role of VEGF, however, seems to be independent of this effect.     

RNA干扰联合基因沉默ACE和AT1R对自发性高血压大鼠血压及心肌重构的影响

目的 用RNA干扰技术下调血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)和血管紧张素Ⅱ1型受体(AT1R)表达,观察其对自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)血压及心肌重构的影响.方法 SHR随机分为5组:即空白对照组(注射生理盐水);病毒对照组(注射对照腺病毒);Ad5-ACE-shRNA治疗组;Ad5-AT1R-shRNA治疗组;Ad5-ACE-AT1R-shRNA治疗组[分别注射表达ACE基因,AT1R基因,ACE和AT1R基因特异短发夹RNA(shRNA)的重组腺病毒载体];同时设WKY正常血压对照组(注射生理盐水).以上各组大鼠均于实验的第1,17天各注射1次,干预前后检测血压、心率的变化.于首次注射后第3天,用实时荧光定量PCR检测心肌、主动脉组织ACE,AT1R mRNA的表达.实验结束时,检测左心重/体重及心肌胶原蛋白的含量,并做电镜切片观察心肌超微结构的变化.结果 Ad5-ACE-shRNA治疗组,Ad5-AT1R-shRNA治疗组,Ad5-ACE-AT1R-shRNA治疗组于每次注射后,尾动脉压分别下降24 mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)、22 mm Hg、26 mm Hg左右,单次注射后降压作用至少可持续15 d,累计降压幅度分别达39 mm Hg、37 mm Hg、43 mm Hg;而SHR空白对照和病毒对照组血压则持续升高约26 mm Hg,且两组比较差异无统计学意义;WKY组尾动脉压无明显变化,治疗组(Ad5-ACE-shRNA,Ad5-ACE-AT1R-shRNA)心肌、主动脉组织中ACEmRNA和治疗组(Ad5-AT1R-shRNA,Ad5-ACE-AT1R-shRNA组)心肌、主动脉组织中AT1RmRNA表达明显低于空白对照和病毒对照组(P<0.05),而与WKY组比较差异无统计学意义.Ad5-ACE-shRNA治疗组,Ad5-T1R-shRNA治疗组,Ad5-ACE-AT1R-shRNA治疗组左心重/体重与心肌胶原蛋白含量[(2.22±0.18)μg/mg、(2.23±0.19)μg/mg、(2.17±0.16)μg/mg与(1.291±0.019)μg/mg、(1.298±0.019)μg/mg、(1.276±0.019)μg/mg]明显低于空白对照组[(3.23±0.13)μg/mg与(1.683±0.013)μg/mg]和病毒对照组[(3.25±0.12)μg/mg与(1.693±0.013)μg/mg],P均<0.05,但还未降到WKY组水平[(2.06±0.12)μg/mg与(1.258±0.019)μg/mg].电镜观察显示治疗组心肌细胞超微结构明显改善,尤以Ad5-ACE-AT1R-shRNA治疗组改善明显.结论 RNA干扰可有效下调ACE和AT1R表达,降低自发性高血压大鼠血压并改善心肌重构,尤以Ad5-ACE-AT1R-shRNA治疗组效果明显且副作用小.RNA干扰有望成为高血压病基因治疗的新方法.     

Differential effect of low-dose thiazides on the renin angiotensin system in genetically hypertensive and normotensive rats

Fifty years since thiazide diuretics were introduced, they are established as first-line antihypertensive therapy. Because the thiazide dosing profile lessened, the blood pressure lowering mechanism may lie outside their diuretic properties. We evaluated this mechanism in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and normotensive Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY) by examining the effects of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) administration on renin-angiotensin system components. The 7-day, 1.5 mg/kg per day HCTZ did not change systolic pressure (SBP) in WKY, but decreased SBP by 41 ± 2 mm Hg (P < .0001) in SHR, independent of increased water intake, urine output, or alterations in electrolyte excretion. HCTZ significantly increased the plasma concentrations of angiotensin I (Ang I) and angiotensin II (Ang II) in both WKY and SHR while reducing angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity and the Ang II/Ang I ratio (17.1 ± 2.9 before vs. 10.3 ± 2.9 after, P < .05) only in SHR. HCTZ increased cardiac ACE2 mRNA and activity, and neprilysin mRNA in WKY. Conversely in SHR, ACE2 activity was decreased and aside from a 75% increase in AT₁ mRNA in the HCTZ-treated SHR, the other variables remained unaltered. Measures of cardiac mas receptor mRNA showed no changes in response to treatment in both strains, although it was significantly lower in untreated SHR. These data, which document for the first time the effect of low-dose thiazide on the activity of the ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/mas receptor axis, suggest that the opposing arm of the system does not substantially contribute to the antihypertensive effect of thiazides.     

Differential subcellular actions of ACE inhibitors and AT(1) receptor antagonists on cardiac remodeling induced by chronic inhibition of NO synthesis in rats

Chronic inhibition of NO synthesis induces cardiac hypertrophy independent of systemic blood pressure (SBP) by increasing protein synthesis in vivo. We examined whether ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) enalapril and temocapril and angiotensin II type-I receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) losartan and CS-866 can block cardiac hypertrophy and whether changes in activation of 70-kDa S6 kinase (p70S6K) or extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) are involved. The following 13 groups were studied: untreated Wistar-Kyoto rats and rats treated with NO synthase inhibitor Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), D-NAME (the inactive isomer of L-NAME), L-NAME plus hydralazine, L-NAME plus enalapril (3 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)) or temocapril (1 or 10 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)), L-NAME plus losartan (10 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)) or CS-866 (1 or 10 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)), L-NAME plus temocapril-CS866 in combination (1 or 10 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)), and L-NAME plus rapamycin (0.5 mg. kg(-1). d(-1)). After 8 weeks of each experiment, ratios of coronary wall to lumen (wall/lumen) and left ventricular weight to body weight (LVW/BW) were quantified. L-NAME increased SBP, wall/lumen, and LVW/BW compared with that of control. ACEIs, ARBs, and hydralazine equally canceled the increase in SBP induced by L-NAME. However, ACEIs and ARBs equally (but not hydralazine) attenuated increase in wall/lumen and LVW/BW induced by L-NAME. The L-NAME group showed both p70S6K and ERK activation in myocardium (2.2-fold and 1.8-fold versus control, respectively). ACEIs inactivated p70S6K and ARBs inactivated ERK in myocardium, but hydralazine did not change activation of either kinase. Thus, ACEIs and ARBs modulate different intracellular signaling pathways, inhibiting p70S6K or ERK, respectively, to elicit equal reduction of cardiac hypertrophy induced by chronic inhibition of NO synthesis in vivo.     

The cardiovascular actions of omapatrilat in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Omapatrilat is a newly developed vasopeptidase inhibitor that inhibits both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase and has potent antihypertensive efficacy. However, the specific effect of omapatrilat on cardiac function and left ventricular hypertrophy with hypertension remains controversial. Therefore, we investigated the effect of omapatrilat on blood pressure, cardiac hypertrophy, and cardiac function in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Studies were performed in SHR that received vehicle (n=9), omapatrilat (n=10), or fosinopril (ACE inhibitor, n=7) by daily gavage for 56 days. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean blood pressure (MBP) were measured by tail plethysmography. Left ventricular fractional shortening and left ventricular mass were measured by echocardiography at day 56. Omapatrilat and fosinopril significantly decreased SBP and MBP from day 1 through day 56, and omapatrilat markedly reduced SBP and MBP compared with fosinopril from day 21 to day 56. Although both omapatrilat and fosinopril decreased left ventricular mass and left ventricular mass-tobody weight ratio with increased LV fractional shortening, omapatrilat had a more potent effect on the reduction of left ventricular mass and improvement of cardiac function. This study shows that in SHR, omapatrilat mediated a potent and stable antihypertensive effect and a reduction in left ventricular mass with improvement of cardiac function, compared with ACE inhibition alone.     

A vaccine for hypertension based on virus-like particles: preclinical efficacy and phase I safety and immunogenicity

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of efficacious drugs, the success of treating hypertension is limited by patients' inconsistent drug intake. Immunization against angiotensin II may offer a valuable alternative to conventional drugs for the treatment of hypertension, because vaccines induce relatively long-lasting effects and do not require daily dosing. Here we describe the preclinical development and the phase I clinical trial testing of a virus-like particle (VLP)-based antihypertensive vaccine. METHODS AND RESULTS: An angiotensin II-derived peptide was conjugated to the VLP Qbeta (AngQb). AngQb was highly immunogenic in mice and rats. To test for efficacy, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were immunized with 400 microg AngQb or VLP alone. Group mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was reduced by up to 21 mmHg (159 +/- 2 versus 180 +/- 5 mmHg, P < 0.001), and total angiotensin II levels (antibody-bound and free) were increased ninefold (85 +/- 20 versus 9 +/- 1 pmol/l, P = 0.002) compared with VLP controls. SHR treated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril (1 mg/kg per day by mouth) reached an SBP of 155 +/- 2 mmHg. Twelve healthy volunteers of a placebo-controlled randomized phase I trial were injected once with 100 microg AngQb. Angiotensin II-specific antibodies were raised in all subjects (100% responder rate) and AngQb was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: AngQb reduces blood pressure in SHR to levels obtained with an ACE inhibitor, and is immunogenic and well tolerated in humans. Therefore, vaccination against angiotensin II has the potential to become a useful antihypertensive treatment providing long-lasting effects and improving patient compliance.     

Attenuation of aortic banding-induced cardiac hypertrophy by propranolol is independent of beta-adrenoceptor blockade

OBJECTIVE: Racemic propranolol attenuates cardiac hypertrophy secondary to abdominal aortic banding-induced pressure overload by a mechanism independent of its effect on cardiac work load. This was only observed, however, using doses of propranolol that were much higher than those needed to induce beta-adrenoceptor blockade. Thus, the question remains as to whether the antihypertrophic effect of propranolol depends on its ability to antagonize cardiac beta-adrenoceptor-mediated action (positive chronotropic effect, trophic effect) or on beta-adrenoceptor-independent action. METHODS: In a rat model of chronic pressure overload induced by abdominal aortic banding, we evaluated the effects on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) of the propranolol isomers, L-propranolol and D-propranolol, which compared to L-isomer is approximately 50-fold less potent as a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, but is similarly potent as a membrane-stabilizer, as well as of timolol, a non-selective beta-adrenergic antagonist devoid of membrane stabilizing activity, and disopyramide, which is a membrane stabilizer, but not a beta-adrenoceptor blocker. RESULTS: Compared to sham-operated rats, banded rats had 30% greater left ventricular to body weight (LVW/BW) ratio (P < 0.01). The increase in LVW/BW ratio was significantly attenuated by treatment with 40 and 80 (but not 10) mg/kg per day of L-propranolol. Left ventricular hypertrophy was also prevented by D-propranolol, 40 and 80 mg/kg per day, and disopyramide, 50 mg/kg per day, whereas timolol, 30 and 60 mg/kg per day, showed no antihypertrophic effect. In separate groups of banded rats in which the reduction in heart rate induced by propranolol (80 mg/kg per day) was prevented by chronic cardiac pacing at 375 b.p.m., hypertrophy was again prevented, indicating that the effects of L-propranolol on LVH are not related to a reduction in cardiac work load. CONCLUSIONS: In the aortic banding-induced model of LVH: (i) the antihypertrophic effect of propranolol is independent of its beta-adrenergic blocking activity; and Iii) since disopyramide and D-propranolol also proved to be able to antagonize banding-induced LVH, the hypothesis is proposed that membrane-stabilizing activity, among the ancillary properties of propranolol, most likely accounts for the antihypertrophic effect of this drug.     

Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme reduces susceptibility of hypertrophied rat myocardium to ventricular fibrillation.

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy increases susceptibility to reperfusion arrhythmias and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, may reduce that susceptibility via regression of LV hypertrophy. Rats (n=12 per group) were subjected to abdominal aortic constriction (AC) or sham-operation (SH) and from 3 to 6 weeks after surgery, 3 AC groups received ramipril (0.01, 0.1, or 1 mg/kg per day p.o.) while the SH and 1 AC group received vehicle. Six weeks after surgery (ie after 3 weeks of treatment), the hearts were excised and subjected to independent Langendorf perfusion of left and right coronary beds. The left coronary bed was then subjected to ischemia (7 min) and reperfusion (5 min). Hypertrophied hearts from the vehicle AC group showed a significant increase in the incidence of reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) compared with control hearts from the SH group (92%* vs 33%: *p<0.05); this difference was abolished by ramipril (42%, 50%, and 42%, at 0.01, 0.1, or 1 mg/kg per day, respectively). The LV weight/body weight ratio was significantly increased in all AC groups (regardless of ramipril treatment) relative to the SH group. At the cellular level, myocyte length was significantly increased in the vehicle AC group, but was normalized by ramipril treatment (1 mg/kg per day). At the molecular level, atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) mRNA expression was also significantly increased in the vehicle AC group, but was again normalized by ramipril treatment (1 mg/kg per day). In conclusion, short-term treatment with ramipril reduced susceptibility to severe ventricular arrhythmias in hypertrophied rat hearts. This protection was achieved in the absence of a significant reduction in LV weight, but was accompanied by regression of myocyte hypertrophy, as reflected by reductions in cell size and ANF expression.     

Converting Enzyme Inhibition Specifically Prevents the Development and Induces Regression of Cardiac Hypertrophy in Rats

Antihypertensive agents have been shown to differ markedly in their effects on the development and regression of cardiac hypertrophy. In view of possible trophic properties of angiotensin II (ANG II), we compared the effects of equipotent antihypertensive doses of the converting enzyme (CE) inhibitor ramipril (1 mg/kg), the calcium antagonist nifedipine (30 mg/kg), and the arterial vasodilator dihydralazine (30 mg/kg) on cardiac mass in rats subjected to banding of the abdominal aorta. Treatment was started either immediately after banding (“prevention experiments”) or after hypertension and hypertrophy had already developed (“regression experiments”). Groups of untreated animals with aortic constriction and sham-operated animals served as controls.

In the prevention experiments heart weight, myocardial protein content and ANG I1 plasma levels were significantly increased in untreated animals and in those receiving nifedipine and dihydralazine. In contrast, values obtained in animals treated with ramipril were not different from those seen in normotensive, sham operated controls with the exception of plasma ANG I1 levels which were lower.

Similar results were observed in the second series of studies which examined the effect of antihypertensive agents on the “regression” of cardiac hypertrophy. Treatment was started 6 weeks after aortic banding and continued for another 6 weeks. While all three drugs lowered blood pressure equally well, only ramipril induced a significant and complete regression of cardiac hypertrophy to values not different from sham-operated controls. In addition we studied a group of animals treated with a non-antihypertensive low dose of ramipril (1 0 pg/kg). Remarkably, these animals showed the same complete regression of cardiac hypertrophy as seen in the group receiving the antihypertensive dose of CE inhibitor.

Our study indicates a selective advantage of CE inhibitors over other antihypertensive drugs in the prevention and regression of hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy. Importantly, the dissociation between effects on blood pressure and cardiac mass demonstrated in the experiments with a low dose of ramipril stresses the role of factors other than blood pressure and afterload on the development of hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy. One such peptide, thus, may be ANG with its known potential as a growth factor.