Significance of para-aortic lymph node dissection in advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Since surgical results in advanced gastric cancer remain poor and para-aortic lymph node dissection may contribute to survival, it is useful to determine the significance of para-aortic lymph node dissection. METHODOLOGY: Para-aortic lymph node dissection was provisionally indicated for patients with invasion depth deeper than the subserosal layer. Clinicopathologic variables were retrospectively analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariate analysis to predict para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Similarly, they were analyzed using univariate analysis and the Cox's proportional hazards regression model to estimate the prognostic factor in 120 patients who underwent para-aortic lymph node dissection. Surgical results and post-operative complications were compared between para-aortic lymph node dissection and D2 dissection. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that the mean diameter, the degree of lymph node metastasis, and the invasion depth were significant predictors of para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis showed that n2 was the only independent predictive factor as to para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed tumor site, tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, number of positive lymph nodes, INF, and stage were significantly associated with 5-year survival. The Cox's proportional hazards regression model showed that the number of positive lymph nodes and the number of positive para-aortic lymph nodes were independent prognostic factors. Patients with < or = 10 positive lymph nodes in any stage or < or = 3 positive para-aortic lymph nodes in stage IVb had significantly better surgical results. Surgical results for patients who underwent para-aortic lymph node dissection with n2 or invasion depth deeper than the exposed serosa were significantly higher than those in D2. As to post-operative complications, pancreatic fistula and respiratory complications were significantly frequent after para-aortic lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: n2 is helpful in predicting para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Whereas, post-operative morbidity such as pancreatic fistula and respiratory complications after para-aortic lymph node dissection were significantly higher, they were controllable. Para-aortic lymph node dissection should be indicated in advanced gastric cancer patients in which lymph node metastasis is over n2 or invasion depth is deeper than the exposed serosa. But the number of positive para-aortic lymph nodes must be less than three.     

Esophageal reconstruction with remnant stomach:A case report and review of literature

The number of patients developing esophageal cancer after gastrectomy has increased.However,gastric remnant is very rarely used for reconstruction in esophageal cancer surgery because of the risk of anastomotic leakage resulting from insufficient blood flow.We present a case of esophageal cancer using gastric remnant for esophageal substitution after distal gastrectomy in a 57-year-old man who presented with a 1-month history of mild dysphagia and a background history of alcohol abuse.Gastroscopy showed a 1.2 cm × 1.0 cm bulge tumor of the lower third esophagus with the upper margin located 39 cm from the dental arcade.Computed tomography of the chest showed lower third esophageal wall thickening.The patient underwent en bloc radical esophagectomy with a two-field lymph node dissection of the upper abdomen and mediastinum via a left-sided posterolateral thoracotomy through the seventh intercostal space.The upper end of the esophagus was resected 5 cm above the tumor.The gastric remnant was used for reconstruction of the esophago-gastrostomy and placed in the left thoracic cavity.The patient started a liquid diet on postoperative day 8 and was discharged on the 10 th postoperative day without complications.In this report,we demonstrate that the gastric remnant may be used for reconstruction in patients with esophageal cancer as a substitute organ after distal gastrectomy.     

Procedure for lymph node dissection around splenic artery in proximal gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The effect of lymph node metastasis around the splenic artery on the prognosis of proximal gastric cancer patients is not confirmed. The aim of this study is to clarify the optimal procedure for lymph node dissection along the splenic artery in proximal gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: Proximal gastric cancer patients who underwent total gastrectomy with pancreaticosplenectomy were examined. The anatomical location of lymph nodes and the metastases around the pancreas were also studied in pancreatic cancer patients who underwent total pancreatectomy. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of lymph node metastasis around the splenic artery showed that No. 11 lymph node metastasis was affected by No.10 lymph node that was predicted by depth of invasion. Multivariate analysis of prognostic variables by Cox's proportional hazard regression revealed that No. 10 lymph node metastasis was the significant factor affecting prognosis. No lymph node metastasis infiltrating the pancreatic parenchyma was observed in the pancreatic body or the tail. CONCLUSIONS: Total gastrectomy preserving the pancreas and spleen is the optimal procedure in proximal T2 gastric cancer. Total gastrectomy with splenectomy is appropriate in T3 cases, and distal pancreatectomy should be additionally done only in cases of direct invasion by the lymph node and/or the tumor to the pancreas.     

Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer after distal gastrectomy

We report the use of gastric remnant for esophageal substitution after distal gastrectomy in a 53-year-old man with esophageal cancer. This patient had a 4-month history of progressive dysphagia for solid food. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a 7.0 cm bulge tumor in the middle-lower esophagus, wherein the upper margin was located 28 cm from the dental arcade. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest revealed wall thickening in the middle-lower esophagus. In this case, radical en bloc esophagectomy with a two-field lymph node dissection was performed in the upper abdomen and mediastinum via a posterolateral right thoracotomy through the fifth intercostal space. Esophagogastric anastomosis was performed mechanically in the apex of the chest using a circular stapler. The gastric remnant was used for reconstruction of the esophago-gastrostomy and placed in the right thoracic cavity. The patient was discharged on the 12th postoperative day without complications. The gastric remnant may be used for reconstruction in patients with esophageal cancer as a substitute organ after distal gastrectomy.     

Prophylactic lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer invading submucosa

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Prophylactic lymph node dissection for gastric cancer patients was considered to prolong survival time and D2 lymph node dissection was a standard treatment for early gastric cancer invading submucosa without lymph node metastasis. We investigated the possibility of minimizing the extent of prophylactic lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer invading submucosa if there was no evidence of lymph node metastasis. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed data on 404 patients with early gastric cancer invading the submucosa who underwent gastrectomy from 1979 to 1998 in the National Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan. The postoperative survival rate of patients with standard D2 dissection was compared with cases of those with limited D2 dissection which was defined as confined as D2 dissection dissections No.7 (lymph nodes were those along the left gastric artery), No.8 (lymph nodes along the anterosuperior common hepatic artery) and No.9 (lymph nodes along the celiac artery). RESULTS: Of the 404 patients, 52 and 17 had lymph node metastasis in group 1 and group 2 nodes, respectively. Of 17 patients with lymph node metastasis in group 2, 14 (82.4%) had metastasis confined to No.7, 8 and 9 of group 2 nodes. The 5-year survival rate of patients with submucosal cancer without lymph node metastasis was 94.4% after limited D2 dissection and 97.3% after standard D2 dissection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate prophylactic lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer invading the submucosa without lymph node metastasis was considered to be minimized to limited D2 dissection.     

Lymphatic invasion in small differentiated-type mucosal gastric cancer

Endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer is indicated for patients who are at negligible risk of lymph node metastasis. A 71-year-old female underwent endoscopic resection for a 15-mm differentiated-type mucosal gastric tumor, as recommended in the Japanese treatment guidelines. A histological examination revealed lymphatic invasion. Therefore, we performed laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and D1+ lymph node dissection. A histological examination detected no.3 lymph node metastasis, but no residual cancer cells were observed at the site of the endoscopic resection. This case is rare as lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis are highly unusual in small differentiated-type mucosal gastric cancer. Having experienced this case, we consider that en-bloc endoscopic resection of such lesions is extremely important, as it allows precise histological examinations to be performed, which can determine the necessity of additional treatment.     

Indications of limited surgery for gastric cancer with submucosal invasion--analysis of 715 cases with special reference to site of the tumor and level 2 lymph nodes

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is controversy as to whether limited or extended lymph node dissection should be performed for gastric cancer with submucosal invasion. METHODOLOGY: To clarify the indications of limited surgery for gastric cancer invading the submucosa, we retrospectively examined the incidence of lymph node metastases with regard to the location of the tumor and distant lymph node station in 715 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer with submucosal invasion. We classified the level 2 lymph nodes into four groups as follows: group 1 was defined as perigastric lymph nodes far from the primary tumors, group 2 as nodes around the left gastric and the common hepatic arteries, group 3 as nodes around the celiac axis, and group 4 as nodes along the splenic artery. RESULTS: The occurrence of the metastases to level 1 nodes was 14.5% (104 of 715) and that to level 2 nodes was 4.5% (32 of 715). Among the latter, metastases to group 1 lymph nodes were detected in 6 only in the lower third (2.1%) and that to group 2 in 5 in the upper third (6.2%), 9 in the middle third (2.6%), and 12 in the lower third of the stomach (4.1%). Metastases to groups 3 and 4 were only recognized in 2 in the middle third of the stomach (0.3%). Tumors less than 8 mm did not metastasize to lymph nodes and those less than 12 mm did not metastasize to distant ones. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that in gastric cancer invading the submucosa, it would be sufficient to dissect group 2 lymph nodes for tumors located at the upper third or the middle third of the stomach, and for tumors located in the lower third of the stomach nodes of groups 1 and 2 should be dissected. For tumors less than 8 mm in the diameter partial resection alone could do and for those less than 12 mm D1 dissection is recommended.     

Higher incidence of gastric remnant cancer after proximal than distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proximal gastrectomy has been widely accepted as a standard operation for early stage gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. Therefore, cancer of the distal gastric remnant is now increasing. The aims of this study were to clarify and compare the incidences of gastric remnant cancer after proximal and distal gastrectomy. METHODOLOGY: Data on a consecutive series of 809 cases of gastrectomy performed for early gastric cancer from 1991 to 2003 in Shikoku Cancer Center were analyzed retrospectively with respect to the incidence of gastric remnant cancer. RESULTS: We performed distal gastrectomy in 624 patients and proximal gastrectomy in 47 patients during the study period. After those operations, the gastric remnants of 457 cases and 33 cases, respectively, were surveyed periodically by endoscopic examination at our hospital. Among those surveyed cases, 10 patients (2.2%) and 3 patients (9.1%) were diagnosed as having gastric remnant cancer, respectively. The gastric remnant cancer-free survival after proximal gastrectomy was significantly lower than that after distal gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the higher incidence of gastric remnant cancer after proximal gastrectomy, it is more important to survey the gastric remnant after proximal gastrectomy periodically by postoperative endoscopic examination.     

Clinicopathologic differences between early gastric remnant cancer and early primary gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was designed to clarify the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival in early gastric remnant cancer and compare with early primary cancer in the upper third of the stomach. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-five patients with early gastric remnant cancer, who underwent resection at Kanagawa Cancer Center and First Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University between 1974 and 1996 were evaluated in this study. Various clinicopathologic characteristics, such as age, sex, symptoms, size of tumor, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, cell differentiation, and survival were investigated and early gastric remnant cancer was compared with early primary cancer in the upper third of the stomach. RESULTS: According to the macroscopic type, protruded type such as I or II type accounted for a great majority in early gastric remnant cancer, while II c depressed type was common in early primary cancer in the upper third of the stomach, comprising 64.2% of all cases. Pathological examination disclosed that well-differentiated carcinoma and mucosal carcinoma were more frequently observed in early gastric remnant cancer than in early primary cancer in the upper-third of the stomach. The 5-year survival rate was 83.5% for early primary cancer in the upper-third of the stomach. In contrast, no patients experienced recurrence after operation for early gastric remnant cancer. CONCLUSIONS: From the view point of clinicopathological evaluation, gastric remnant cancer is a special from of gastric cancer. A follow-up program is important in order to detect early gastric remnant cancer. A low incidence of lymph node metastasis suggests that endoscopic mucosal resection of the tumor or limited operation could be performed under strict indication.     

Cardiac tamponade due to metastasis from early gastric cancer

We report a case of cardiac tamponade caused by metastasis from early gastric cancer. A 44-year-old woman was detected to have an abnormality of the stomach on barium meal during an annual medical checkup. Gastroendoscopy disclosed superficial depressed gastric lesions, and histopathological examination of biopsy specimens revealed the diagnosis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) revealed no evidence of metastasis. We performed distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Histopathological examination revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma confined to the mucosal layer. Lymphatic invasion was detected only in the mucosal region beneath the tumor; however, lymph node metastasis was found in almost half of dissected lymph nodes. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered on an outpatient basis with 36 courses of mitomycinC infused (8 mg/day) once every 4 weeks. However, 3 years after the surgery, the patient developed cardiac tamponade due to carcinomatous pericarditis. We performed drainage of the malignant effusion and initiated treatment with S-1 and docetaxel. Although the patient showed some clinical improvement, the patient died 15 months after the occurrence of cardiac tamponade.     

Therapeutic strategy for scirrhous type gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: As no appropriate therapeutic strategy has yet been established in scirrhous type gastric cancer, we retrospectively analyzed the therapeutic outcomes in patients with this type of cancer. METHODOLOGY: A total of 183 patients with scirrhous type gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. 127 of them underwent resection; 61 potentially curative gastrectomy; 66 palliative resection; and 56 had no surgery. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that the number of metastatic lymph nodes and the depth of invasion influenced prognosis in curatively resected cases, whereas no factor did so after palliative resection. Multivariate analysis showed that prognosis was affected independently by peritoneal metastasis and non-regional lymph node metastasis in all resected cases, but by the number of metastatic lymph nodes in curatively resected cases. There was no significant difference in survival between patients undergoing and those not undergoing palliative gastrectomy. Prophylactic (6) and therapeutic CHPP (12) had no efficacy on peritoneal metastasis. Furthermore, left upper abdominal evisceration (LUAE) (9) did not improve long-term results in curatively resected cases. CONCLUSIONS: In scirrhous type gastric cancer, gastrectomy including extended lymph node dissection is justified only in patients with limited lymph node metastasis, and palliative gastrectomy should be not performed because it has no efficacy on survival.     

Recurrence in early gastric cancer--presence of micrometastasis in lymph node of node negative early gastric cancer patient with recurrence

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are cases of recurrence even after curative resection in early gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: Seven hundred and sixty-five patients with early gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy were analyzed to identify the prognostic factor. Micrometastases within lymph nodes were determined by immunohistochemistry using anti-cytokeratin antibody in node-negative early gastric cancer patients with recurrence. RESULTS: The recurrence was observed in 17 patients. Hematogenous recurrence was observed most frequently (47.1%), followed by peritoneal recurrence (23.5%). Of 17 patients with recurrence, 6 (35.3%) patients died more than 5 years after operation. The prognosis was poorer when the patients were older, and the depth of invasion was greater, lymph node metastasis, lymphatic involvement, and vascular involvement were present, and lymph node dissection was limited. The independent prognostic factors were lymph node metastasis, lymph node dissection, and age by multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards. Micrometastases within lymph nodes were confirmed in 3 of 6 node-negative patients with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: When patients have lymph node metastases or are older, close and long-term follow-up and careful planning of postoperative adjuvant therapy might be necessary to avoid recurrence. The detection of micrometastases by anti-cytokeratin antibody might be useful for predicting the possibility of recurrence in early gastric cancer.     

Distribution of lymph node metastasis in gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In gastric cancer, appropriate lymph node dissection increases survival, and hence it is of value to determine lymph node metastasis distribution in the early phase of progression. METHODOLOGY: This study involved a series of 274 consecutive patients with 1-6 lymph node metastases occurring after resection. The pattern of lymph node metastases was analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of 102 patients with single lymph node metastasis, over 60% of metastases occurred in specific lymph nodes for each tumor. However, the remainder was scattered in an unpredictable manner including the para-aortic lymph nodes. Despite variations in invasiveness of tumors in patients with a single lymph node, the distribution remained unchanged. Nor was there any change in patients with an increased number of metastatic lymph nodes. However, in the latter group a higher proportion of metastases were widespread. About 85-90% of node was located within paragastric lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Over 60% of metastatic lymph nodes would be eliminated by the dissection of specific areas determined by the site of the tumor. If the concept of sentinel lymph nodes in gastric cancer is valid, navigation surgery will be necessary for patients with early gastric cancer to locate such unpredictable metastasis.     

Gastric remnant cancer compared with primary proximal gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, detections of early-stage gastric remnant cancer and small proximal gastric cancer are increasing. The aim of this study was to compare pathologic and prognostic data of gastric remnant cancer with those of primary proximal gastric cancer including upper gastric cancer based on a recent 15-year experience at a single institute in Japan. METHODOLOGY: Among 698 patients who underwent gastrectomy for cancer between 1984 and 1998, 15 (2.1%) were patients with gastric remnant cancer. During the same period, 139 patients underwent primary gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer which included 71 with upper gastric cancer confined to the upper one-third of the stomach. Clinicopathologic findings of gastric remnant cancer were compared with those of proximal gastric cancer. RESULTS: Of 15 gastric remnant cancers, 8 (53%) were stage I tumors. Although gastric remnant cancer and proximal gastric cancer was not different in several clinicopathologic factors, gastric remnant cancer and upper gastric cancer confined to the upper one-third of the stomach was different with regard to the frequency of tumor size > or = 4 cm (60% vs. 32%, p < 0.05), poorly differentiated type (67% vs. 38%, p < 0.05), serosal invasion (40% vs. 11%, p < 0.01), lymph node metastasis (47% vs. 20%, p < 0.05), stage III or IV disease (47% vs. 10%, p < 0.01), and noncurative gastrectomy (20% vs. 1%, p < 0.01). The 5-year survival rate of gastric remnant cancer (69%) was higher than that of proximal gastric cancer (57%) and lower than that of upper gastric cancer (81%), although the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In our recent series, a half of gastric remnant cancers are stage I tumors. Although gastric remnant cancers are similar to proximal gastric cancers, they are more advanced and their surgical results are less satisfactory when compared with upper gastric cancers confined to the upper one-third of the stomach.     

Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Abstract: In 1991, we first performed a simple technique of Iaparoscopy-assisted Bill-roth I gastrectomy for patients with mucosal gastric cancer. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) sometimes fails to completely resect the early gastric cancer lesion, nor does it give full histopathology of the resected stomach. The aim of this study was to review the surgical and pathological findings of eight patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy after EMR for early gastric cancer. Of 54 patients with early gastric cancer who were treated with laparoscopic gastrectomy between 1994 and 1998, eight patients underwent surgery after EMR. The resected margin of the EMR specimens was positive in three and suspicious in five; and three underwent laparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach, while five underwent Iaparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection. All but one resected stomach had residual cancer tissue in the mucosa or submucosa, and three patients had multiple gastric cancers. The results indicated that remnant cancer tissue might be present when the resected margin of the EMR specimen was positive or suspicious. Partial resection or distal gastrectomy under laparoscopy is useful for such patients who have undergone EMR for early gastric cancer. (Dig Endooc 1999; 11:132–136)     

直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的再思考

直肠淋巴流向的研究从1895年D. Gerota的研究开始,提出了直肠淋巴流向可以分为上、中、下三个方向,经过很多学者的进一步研究修正,现普遍认为侧方淋巴流向可以分为4个方向：1.前方,由膀胱下动脉,前列腺动脉,经闭孔动脉到髂总动脉;2.沿直肠中动脉到髂内动脉;3.沿着骶中动脉和骶外侧动脉到腹主动脉分叉部位;4.沿着直肠下动脉到髂内动脉。侧方淋巴结转移主要发生在低位直肠癌,浸润深度大于肌层者,而转移的侧方淋巴结并不包括在直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术（TME）范围之内。NCCN直肠癌诊疗指南中没有提及侧方淋巴结的概念,日本大肠癌规约则认为有适应证的低位直肠癌应行侧方淋巴结清扫术。西方学者认为直肠癌侧方淋巴结转移是全身疾病,侧方淋巴结清扫难以改善总体临床结局;日本学者则认为是局部疾病,对低位直肠癌规范手术为TME＋侧方淋巴结清扫。西方学者认为术前放化疗可替代侧方淋巴结清扫;东方学者则认为对于术前放化疗不敏感的直肠癌患者,侧方淋巴结清扫术仍不失为一个可供选择的治疗方案。低位直肠癌患者是否应行预防性盆腔侧方淋巴结清扫仍存在争议,但治疗性侧方淋巴结清扫术则是日本的直肠癌规范治疗。不少研究报道了腹腔镜侧方淋巴结清扫术的初步探索结果,认为其是安全有效的,但其与开放手术的远期肿瘤学结果对比仍需多中心随机对照研究验证。     

Postoperative morbidity/mortality and survival rates after total gastrectomy, with splenectomy/pancreaticosplenectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Indications for splenectomy in patients with proximal and middle gastric cancer remain controversial. We investigated characteristic findings in patients with lymph node metastasis to the splenic hilus and the indication of splenectomy with total gastectomy for T2 and T3 advanced gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: Two hundred and forty-one Japanese patients underwent curative operations for T2 and T3 advanced gastric cancer. RESULTS: The mortality rates were similar, but the morbidity rate for patients who underwent pancreaticosplenectomy was higher than for patients who underwent either total gastrectomy alone or with splenectomy (p<0.007). The rates in cases of lymph node metastasis at the depth of tumor invasion within the subserosa and serosa (T3) were 1.7% and 17.5%, respectively (p<0.003). Lymph node metastasis to the splenic hilus was also evident in patients with T3 or T2 advanced gastric cancer with multiple lymph nodes metastasis (more than 7 nodes). The 10-year survival rates for patients who underwent total gastrectomy alone, with splenectomy, and with pancreaticosplenectomy in T3 advanced gastric cancers were 25%, 42% and 32%, respectively (p=0.184). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, the addition of distal pancreaticosplenectomy to total gastrectomy in patients with T2 and T3 advanced gastric cancer increased the risk of complications. Nevertheless, we recommend that total gastrectomy with splenectomy should be done for patients with T3 advanced gastric cancers [and T2 advanced gastric cancer with multiple lymph nodes metastasis (more than 7 nodes)], recognizing the lymph node metastasis to the splenic hilus.     

Indications for pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is necessary to study the relation between lymph node metastasis in the suprapyloric or lesser curvature regions and clinicopathologic findings in order to determine the indications for pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed all pertinent data from the cases of 109 patients with gastric cancer located mainly in the middle third of the stomach focusing particularly on status of lymph node metastasis and clinicopathologic findings. All patients had been treated by conventional gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection (D2 or D3). RESULTS: Lymph node metastases were found in the lesser curvature or suprapyloric regions in 18 patients. Primary tumors were located in the lesser curvature side in 15 of these 18 patients and in the greater curvature side in only 3. Primary tumors in the greater curvature side with involvement in the lesser curvature or suprapyloric lymph nodes were greater than 4.0 cm in diameter, whereas primary tumors in the lesser curvature side with such metastasis were greater than 1.3 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Indications for pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with preserving of the pyloric branch of the vagal nerve perhaps can be expanded to middle stomach cancer located in the greater curvature side that is less than 4.0 cm in diameter.     

Gastric Cancer with Multiple Lymph Node Enlargement at the Time of the Sarcoidosis Diagnosis

An 80-year-old woman was found to have a 40-mm depressed-type gastric cancer. Computed tomography showed multiple lymph node enlargement, including paraaortic lymph nodes. The extent of lymph node enlargement was significant compared with the depth of the primary lesion. We conducted distal gastrectomy, D2 lymph node dissection, and a paraaortic lymph node biopsy. Microscopically, the tumor was diagnosed as mucosal cancer. In the dissected lymph nodes, noncaseating granuloma was found without metastasis of adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining using Propionibacterium acnes-specific antibodies showed a large number of P. acnes-positive cells in the granulomas. Finally, the tumor was diagnosed as early-stage gastric cancer and sarcoidosis.     

Gastric cancer with multiple intramural metastases and metastasis to the small intestine which eventually developed Trousseau’s syndrome: report of a case

Here we report a rare case of Trousseau’s syndrome in a patient with gastric cancer with multiple intramural metastases and metastasis to the small intestine. A 70 year-old male complaining of appetite loss and weight loss of 7 kg within 3 months was admitted to hospital. Esophagogastroduodenal endoscopy revealed an advanced gastric cancer at the pylorus almost occluding the outlet of the stomach, and multiple ulcerative lesions throughout the stomach. A biopsy showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent total gastrectomy. During surgery, part of the distal ileum was found to be abnormally firm and approximately 1 m of the ileum with the cecum colon was resected. Pathologic examination confirmed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma at the pylorus and multiple intramural metastases in most other areas of the stomach. Lymph node metastases were confirmed in 12 out of 40 harvested regional lymph nodes including one positive paraaortic lymph node. The resected ileum contained multiple tumors with ulceration. Massive lymphatic invasion in the stomach and the small intestine was observed, which strongly suggested lymphatic spread of the gastric cancer. The patient was discharged on post-operative day 21; however, 2 months after surgery, he developed multiple cerebral thromboembolisms and died 2 weeks later.