The long-term effects of immune suppression on liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C viral infection

INTRODUCTION: Adequate immune suppression following liver transplantation in recipients with recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not standardized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between immune suppression protocol and the clinical/histological parameters in HCV transplant recipients with an HCV recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on recipients of liver transplants from June 1998 to October 2003 who experienced HCV recurrence. Only patients with liver biopsies at 3 to 5 years following liver transplantation were included in the analysis. The data set included: patient demographics, immune suppression, antiviral therapies, as well as histology to evaluate ductopenia and chronic rejection. Patients divided into groups of high, medium, and low immune suppression were subdivided by treatment with versus without interferon. A control group with similar demographics suffering from cryptogenic cirrhosis was used for comparison. RESULTS: During this period 45 patients had liver biopsies at 3 to 5 years posttransplantation. Their mean age was 56.5 years and mean time from transplant to biopsy was 1543 days. Their average posttransplant survival was 1964 days. There was no difference among the three groups with respect to HCV RNA levels (log(10) IU/mL), age, gender, time from transplant, donor age, and UNOS status. Median HCV RNA levels within the three groups were comparable at various time periods pre- and posttransplant. CONCLUSION: The development of chronic allograft damage following transplantation in recipients with recurrent HCV tended to be worse among patients with low levels of immune suppression, suggesting the importance of therapy to maintain allograft function.     

Older donor livers show early severe histological activity, fibrosis, and graft failure after liver transplantation for hepatitis C

BACKGROUND: In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive liver transplant recipients, infection of the allograft and recurrent liver disease are important problems. Increased donor age has emerged as an important variable affecting patient and graft survival; however, specific age cutoffs and risk ratios for poor histologic outcomes and graft survival are not clear. METHODS: A longitudinal database of all HCV-positive patients transplanted at our center during an 11-year period was used to identify 111 patients who received 124 liver transplants. Graft survival and histological endpoints (severe activity and fibrosis) of HCV infection in the allografts were compared as a function of donor age at transplantation. RESULTS: By Kaplan-Meier analyses, older allografts showed earlier failure and decreased time to severe histological activity and fibrosis as compared with allografts from younger donors. By Cox proportional hazards analysis, older allografts were at greater risk for all severe histologic features and decreased graft survival as compared with younger allografts (P< or =0.02 for all outcomes). Analysis of donor age as a dichotomous variable showed that donors greater than 60 yr were at high risk for deleterious histologic outcomes and graft failure. An age cutoff of 60 yr showed a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 67% for worse graft survival by receiver operating characteristics curve. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced donor age is associated with more aggressive recurrent HCV and early allograft failure in HCV-positive liver transplant recipients. Consideration of donor age is important for decisions regarding patient selection, antiviral therapy, and organ allocation.     

Effects of interferon treatment on liver histology and allograft rejection in patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation.

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation remains a significant cause of graft loss and retransplantation. Although treatment of recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-based regimens has become widely accepted as safe and can lead to sustained virologic clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA, long-term histologic improvement and the risk of precipitating graft rejection remain controversial. The present study is a retrospective evaluation of the clinical and histological consequences of treating recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-based therapy in a selected group of liver transplant recipients. Twenty-three liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C and histologic evidence of progressive fibrosis completed at least 6 months of interferon, 83% of whom received pegylated-interferon alpha-2b; only 4 tolerated ribavirin. Overall, 11 patients (48%) had undetectable HCV RNA at the end of 6 months of treatment. Of these patients, 3 remained HCV RNA-negative on maintenance interferon monotherapy for 33 months, and the other 8 (35%) completed treatment and remained HCV RNA-undetectable 24 weeks after discontinuation of interferon. Overall necroinflammatory activity in liver biopsies obtained 2 years after HCV RNA became undetectable decreased significantly (7.73 +/- 2.37 vs. 5.64 +/- 2.94 units before and after treatment, respectively; P =.016). However, 5 of these 11 patients had no histologic improvement in follow-up liver histology. Liver biopsies in the 12 nonresponders demonstrated disease progression. Of the 23 patients treated with interferon, 8 (35%) had evidence of acute or chronic rejection on posttreatment liver biopsy, most of whom had no previous history of rejection (P <.01 for comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment prevalence of histologic rejection), and 2 experienced graft loss from chronic rejection, requiring retransplantation. In conclusion, interferon treatment of recurrent hepatitis C does not consistently improve histologic disease after virologic response, and it may increase the risk of allograft rejection.     

Comparison of hepatitis C histological recurrence rates and patient survival between split and deceased donor liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists as to whether there is an increased severity or frequency of recurrent hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection in recipients of adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) grafts. We sought to examine the time to histological recurrence and survival in HCV (+) patients who underwent split liver transplantation (SLT), which is technically similar to what occurs in the LDLT procedure. METHODS: Twenty four HCV (+) adult recipients were identified through the UNOS database as having had SLT procedures at three centers: Mount Sinai Medical Center, University of Chicago, and University of California at Los Angeles. Of these, 17 patients with comprehensive data were matched to 32 HCV (+) patients who underwent whole deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) during the same time period. Outcome and time to initial HCV recurrence as documented by liver biopsy were assessed. Liver biopsy was performed when clinically indicated. RESULTS: Patients who had SLT were significantly older (P=.01). There was no difference in number of rejection episodes (P=.40). Fifteen of 17 SLT (88%) versus 24/32 DDLT (75%) patients had documented HCV recurrence by biopsy (P=.46). The time to median cumulative incidence of recurrence of HCV post-liver transplantation was 12.6 months (SLT) versus 39.8 months (DDLT) patients. There was no difference in survival between SLT and DDLT patients (47 vs 70 months, P=.62) nor in cumulative incidence of histological HCV recurrence at 1, 2, and 3 years (P=.198, .919, and .806, respectively). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in the cumulative incidence of histological recurrence of HCV post-liver transplant or in survival between recipients of deceased donor and split liver transplants.     

Pegylated interferon for recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients with renal failure: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C (HCV) universally recurs following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), representing an important cause for retransplantation. Although it is often treated with interferon and ribavirin, ribavirin is contraindicated in the presence of renal failure. In this setting of renal failure, pegylated-interferon monotherapy may be useful for recurrent HCV in liver transplant patients. METHODS: Between June 2001 and November 2002, patients with recurrent HCV were screened to determine if they were eligible for treatment. Renal failure was defined as serum creatinine greater than 1.8 mg/dL. HCVRNA and liver biopsies were performed prior to treatment, end of treatment (EOT) and 6 months after EOT for those who were HCV-RNA negative at EOT. Patients were followed prospectively after starting weekly pegylated-interferon alpha 2b 1.0 microg/kg (Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ, USA). RESULTS: Among the 45 patients with recurrent HCV screened, 9 were eligible, including 8 men and 1 woman of average age 55 years. Eight patients were intolerant to the treatment requiring discontinuation within the first 3 months. Two patients developed a sustained response to HCV eradication. One patient who completed treatment has normal liver tests but is still viremic. CONCLUSIONS: Pegylated-interferon alpha 2b is poorly tolerated in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV and chronic renal failure. Larger, prospective studies are required to determine the optimum duration of treatment and the impact of treatment on histology and quality of life.     

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in liver transplant recipients: risk factors, temporal relationship with hepatitis C virus allograft hepatitis, and impact on mortality

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest an association between diabetes mellitus and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Our aim was to determine (1) the prevalence and determinants of new onset posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in HCV (+) liver transplant (OLT) recipients, (2) the temporal relationship between recurrent allograft hepatitis and the onset of PTDM, and (3) the effects of antiviral therapy on glycemic control. METHODS: Between January of 1991 and December of 1998, of 185 OLTs performed in 176 adult patients, 47 HCV (+) cases and 111 HCV (-) controls were analyzed. We reviewed and analyzed the demographics, etiology of liver failure, pretransplant alcohol abuse, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and clinical characteristics of both groups. In HCV (+) patients, the development of recurrent allograft hepatitis and its therapy were also studied in detail. RESULTS: The prevalence of pretransplant diabetes was similar in the two groups, whereas the prevalence of PTDM was significantly higher in HCV (+) than in HCV (-) patients (64% vs. 28%, P=0.0001). By multivariate analysis, HCV infection (hazard ratio 2.5, P=0.001) and methylprednisolone boluses (hazard ratio 1.09 per bolus, P=0.02) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of PTDM. Development of PTDM was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio 3.67, P<0.0001). The cumulative mortality in HCV (+) PTDM (+) versus HCV (+) PTDM (-) patients was 56% vs. 14% (P=0.001). In HCV (+) patients with PTDM, we could identify two groups based on the temporal relationship between the allograft hepatitis and the onset of PTDM: 13 patients developed PTDM either before or in the absence of hepatitis (group A), and 12 concurrently with the diagnosis of hepatitis (group B). In gr. B, 11 of 12 patients received antiviral therapy. Normalization of liver function tests with improvement in viremia was achieved in 4 of 11 patients, who also demonstrated a marked improvement in their glycemic control. CONCLUSION: We found a high prevalence of PTDM in HCV (+) recipients. PTDM after OLT was associated with significantly increased mortality. HCV infection and methylprednisolone boluses were found to be independent risk factors for the development of PTDM. In approximately half of the HCV (+) patients with PTDM, the onset of PTDM was related to the recurrence of allograft hepatitis. Improvement in glycemic control was achieved in the patients who responded to antiviral therapy.     

Factors that identify survival after liver retransplantation for allograft failure caused by recurrent hepatitis C infection.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is becoming the most common indication for liver retransplantation (ReLTx). This study was a retrospective review of the medical records of liver transplant patients at our institution to determine factors that would identify the best candidates for ReLTx resulting from allograft failure because of HCV recurrence. The patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of indication for initial liver transplant. Group 1 included ReLTx patients whose initial indication for LTx was HCV. Group 2 included patients who received ReLTx who did not have a history of HCV. We defined chronic allograft dysfunction (AD) as patients with persistent jaundice (> 30 days) beginning 6 months after primary liver transplant in the absence of other reasons. HCV was the primary indication for initial orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in 491/1114 patients (44%) from July 1996 to February 2004. The number of patients with AD undergoing ReLTx in Groups 1 and 2 was 22 and 12, respectively. The overall patient and allograft survival at 1 year was 50% and 75% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .04). The rates of primary nonfunction and technical problems after ReLTx were not different between the groups. However, the incidence of recurrent AD was higher in Group 1 at 32% versus 17% in Group 2 (P = .04). Important factors that predicted a successful ReLTx included physical condition at the time of ReLTx (P = .002) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (P = .008). In conclusion, HCV is associated with an increased incidence of chronic graft destruction with a negative effect on long-term results after ReLTx. The optimum candidate for ReLTx is a patient who can maintain normal physical activity. As the allograft shortage continues, the optimal use of cadaveric livers continues to be of primary importance. The use of deceased donor livers in patients with allograft failure caused by HCV remains a highly controversial issue.     

Cyclosporine versus Tacrolimus Treated Liver Transplant Recipients with Chronic Hepatitis C: Outcomes Analysis of the UNOS/OPTN Database

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a problematic cause of morbidity and mortality for liver transplant patients. Immunosuppression including calcineurin‐inhibitors has been implicated in the acceleration of recurrent HCV. Recent studies suggest that outcomes may be better with cyclosporine (CSA‐ME) compared to tacrolimus (TAC), but the data are inconclusive. We retrospectively analyzed data received from the United Network for Organ Sharing on 8809 chronic HCV liver transplant recipients receiving either cyclosporine microemulsion (CSA‐ME) or tacrolimus (TAC) as maintenance immunosuppression prior to discharge. We analyzed patient death, graft failure, failure due recurrent disease and acute cellular rejection (ACR) for CSA‐ME versus TAC treated patients. Three‐year unadjusted patient and graft survival rates were 76.8% and 71.5%, respectively, in the CSA‐ME group versus 79.9% and 75.0% in the TAC group. Propensity score‐adjusted results suggest CSA‐ME treated patients are at increased risk of patient death and graft failure [Hazards ratio (HR) = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.01–1.36 and HR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.04–1.35, respectively] and biopsy‐confirmed AR (HR = 2.03; 95% CI = 1.54–2.67) compared to TAC treated patients. These results provide evidence to reconsider the targeted administration of CSA‐ME to HCV‐infected liver transplant recipients.     

Interferon-alpha and ribavirin for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Initial studies utilizing interferon-alpha and ribavirin for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation showed promising results. Here we report our single-center experience using this combination therapy. METHODS: Liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV (elevated serum aminotransferases, positive serum HCV RNA, and biopsy-proven hepatitis without rejection) received interferon-alpha (1.5-3 million units subcutaneously three times a week) and ribavirin (400-1000 mg p.o. daily) for 12 months or more. Serum aminotransferases, HCV RNA, and severity of hepatitis were followed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients have been treated for at least 3 months, including 13 who have been on 12 or more months of therapy. Three died from allograft failure due to recurrent HCV. Dose reductions of interferon-alpha and/or ribavirin occurred in 22 patients. Thirteen had their medications permanently discontinued for severe adverse effects. Twenty-six patients (81%) had a biochemical response (BR; normalization of serum aminotransferases) after 3 months. End-of-treatment and sustained BR were 77% and 71%, respectively. Mean viral loads decreased 68-77%; however, only three patients became serum HCV RNA negative. After 12 months of therapy, no histological improvement was observed in 11 patients who were biopsied. Patients who received mycophenolate mofetil or daclizumab had a less likelihood of achieving a BR. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients did not tolerate interferon-alpha or ribavirin. Although BR was excellent and mean viral loads decreased significantly, virological clearance was poor and no histological improvement was noted. A more efficacious treatment with less adverse effects for recurrent HCV after liver transplantation is needed.     

Renal transplantation offers a better survival in HCV-infected ESRD patients

Sezer S, Ozdemir FN, Akcay A, Arat Z, Boyacioglu S, Haberal M. Renal transplantation offers a better survival in HCV-infected ESRD patients. Clin Transplant 2004 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00252.x Copyright Blackwell Munksgaard, 2004Abstract: The presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been found to adversely affect the morbidity and mortality rates in the dialysis population. Renal transplantation is a treatment option after a careful pre-transplant evaluation. We designed this study to find the impact of HCV infection on patient survival, co-morbidity and allograft survival in a selected group of hemodialysis (HD) and transplant population. We retrospectively analyzed 116 renal transplant patients (94 HCV-negative, 22 HCV-positive) and 136 HD patients (106 HCV-negative, 30 HCV-positive) who had renal transplantation or underwent dialysis before 1996. The HCV-infected patients were evaluated by liver biopsy for the absence of advanced liver disease before transplantation. There was no clinical or laboratory decompensation of liver disease in transplant and dialysis patient groups. The overall 5-yr survival rates were 85.2% for renal transplant recipients and 74.5% for those on HD. The comparison results revealed a significant difference between HCV-infected patients with and without transplantation. The 3-yr renal allograft survival rates were comparable in HCV-positive and -negative patients, but the risk of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and graft failure were higher at the fifth year in HCV-positive patients. In conclusion, renal transplantation should the preferred therapy in HCV-infected dialysis patients as it improves the survival rates. The presence of HCV infection increases the CAN rate and the influence on allograft survival is evident at the fifth year of assessment.     

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: A nonrandomized trial of interferon alfa alone versus interferon alfa and ribavirin

Liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection often have histological hepatitis, and in some patients, graft failure develops. The aim of this nonrandomized study is to determine the efficacy and tolerability of interferon alfa (IFN alfa) alone and IFN alfa and ribavirin combination therapy in such patients. Forty transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis were initiated on therapy with IFN alfa-2b at 3 million units (MU) three times weekly for 1 month followed by 5 MU three times weekly for 5 months. Twenty patients were administered IFN alfa-2b, 3 MU three times weekly for 1 month followed by 5 MU three times weekly for 11 months, and ribavirin, 600 mg, twice daily orally for 12 months concurrently. The primary end point was sustained clearance of serum HCV RNA, and secondary end points were serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level normalization and histological improvement. Thirty patients completed 6 months of IFN-alfa monotherapy and 15 patients completed 12 months of IFN alfa and ribavirin combination therapy. End-of-treatment biochemical responses were similar in the two groups (IFN alfa, 20% v combination therapy, 25%); however, viral clearance was greater in the combination-therapy group (40% v 15%; P = .04). Six months after the completion of therapy, only 1 patient (2.5%) in the IFN-alfa group and 4 patients (20%) in the combination-therapy group were HCV RNA negative (P = .03). Serum ALT and HCV RNA levels declined significantly in both groups during therapy. There was no improvement in inflammatory grade, and fibrosis score was worse in both groups. Ten patients (25%) in the IFN-alfa group and 5 patients (20%) in the combination-therapy group withdrew because of adverse effects. We conclude that in liver allograft recipients with recurrent hepatitis C, combination therapy with IFN alfa and ribavirin is more efficacious than treatment with IFN alfa alone. However, the efficacy is limited by tolerability. (Liver Transpl 2001;7:863-869.)     

Liver transplantation arrests and reverses muscle wasting

Muscle wasting, sarcopenia, is common in advanced cirrhosis and predicts adverse outcomes while awaiting and following liver transplantation. Frequent post‐transplant worsening of sarcopenia has attracted recent interest. It is unknown whether this serious problem is an expected metabolic consequence of transplantation or results from confounding conditions such as recurrent allograft liver disease or avoidable post‐transplant complications. To clarify this question, we studied pre‐ and post‐transplant muscle mass in a retrospective cohort of 40 patients transplanted for three diseases – alcoholic cirrhosis, non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis cirrhosis – in whom allograft disease recurrence was monitored and excluded, and who lacked common post‐transplant muscle wasting complications such as sepsis, renal failure, ischemia, and cholestasis. We measured skeletal muscle index (SMI) using computed tomography before and 12–48 months after transplant. SMI as a categorical variable significantly improved, from 18 patients above the normal cutoff pre‐transplant to 28 post‐transplant (p = 0.008). SMI increases were greatest in patients with the lowest pre‐transplant SMI (p < 0.01). As a continuous variable, mean SMI remained stable, with a non‐significant trend toward improvement. We conclude that after liver transplantation sarcopenia does not progress but is arrested and frequently improves in the absence of confounding conditions.     

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in renal transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus infection.

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) has been described as a specific manifestation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in liver allograft recipients characterized by a rapid progression to liver failure. Only sporadic cases have been reported in other immunocompromised groups infected with HBV and in a few transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We present the occurrence of FCH in 4 HCV-infected renal transplant recipients within a series of 73 renal transplant recipients with HCV infection followed up closely serologically and with consecutive liver biopsies. All 4 patients received the triple-immunosuppressive regimen (azathioprine, cyclosporine A, methylprednisolone). The interval from transplantation to the appearance of liver dysfunction was 1 to 4 months and to histological diagnosis, 3 to 11 months. The biochemical profile was analogous to a progressive cholestatic syndrome in 3 patients, whereas the fourth patient had only slightly increased alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase (gammaGT) levels. Liver histological examination showed the characteristic pattern of FCH in 2 patients, whereas the other 2 patients had changes compatible with an early stage. All patients were anti-HCV negative at the time of transplantation, whereas 2 patients, 1 with incomplete and 1with complete histological FCH features, seroconverted after 3 and 31 months, respectively. The patients were HCV RNA positive at the time of the first liver biopsy and showed high serum HCV RNA levels (14 to 58 x 10(6) Eq/mL, branched DNA). HCV genotype was 1b in 3 patients and 3a in 1 patient. After histological diagnosis, immunosuppression was drastically reduced. Two patients died of sepsis and liver failure 16 and 18 months posttransplantation, whereas the seroconverted patients showed marked improvement of their liver disease, which was histologically verified in 1 patient. In conclusion, FCH can occur in HCV-infected renal transplant recipients. It seems to develop as a complication of a recent HCV infection during the period of maximal immunosuppression and is associated with high HCV viremia levels. There are indications that drastic reduction of immunosuppression may have a beneficial effect on the outcome of the disease.     

Hepatitis C virus genotypes in patients on renal replacement therapy

Background: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent among patients on renal replacement therapy. Viral genomic differences can contribute to diversities in clinical manifestation. The distribution of HCV genotypes depends on the geographical region and risk factors unique to the patient population. We determined the HCV genotypes in patients on renal replacement therapy in order to define the genotypic profile and examine the relationship between genotype, mode of renal replacement therapy, and the prevalence as well as severity of liver disease. Methods: HCV genotypes were determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing of the 5'-untranslated region in 21 renal allograft recipients, 29 patients on dialysis, and 26 non-renal failure controls. Results: The most prevalent genotype among patients with renal failure was 1b (78%), followed by 1a (10%) and 6a (8%). 2 renal allograft recipients with 6a infection probably acquired HCV from the same donor. The relative prevalence of HCV genotypes was similar to that of controls. While renal allograft recipients demonstrated more severe liver disease than dialysis patients, the prevalence and severity of chronic hepatitis were similar between patients with 1b and non-1b infection. Conclusions: Resemblance of genotype distribution in Hong Kong to that of southern China and east Asia suggests common epidemiological evolution of HCV infection in these regions. Our results imply that in addition to viral characteristics, host factors such as the immunosuppressed state play an important role in the pathogenesis of liver disease in these patients.     

Limiting hepatitis C virus progression in liver transplant recipients using sirolimus-based immunosuppression

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes progressive liver fibrosis in liver transplant recipients and is the principal cause of long-term allograft failure. The antifibrotic effects of sirolimus are seen in animal models but have not been described in liver transplant recipients. We reviewed 1274 liver recipients from 2002 to 2010 and identified a cohort of HCV recipients exposed to sirolimus as primary immunosuppression (SRL Cohort) and an HCV Control Group of recipients who had never received sirolimus. Yearly protocol biopsies were done recording fibrosis stage (METAVIR score) with biopsy compliance of >80% at both year one and two. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the SRL Cohort had significantly less advanced fibrosis (stage ≥2) compared to the HCV Control Group at year one (15.3% vs. 36.2%, p < 0.0001) and year two (30.1% vs. 50.5%, p = 0.001). Because sirolimus is sometimes discontinued for side effects, the SRL Cohort was subgroup stratified for sirolimus duration, showing progressively less fibrosis with longer sirolimus duration. Multivariate analysis demonstrated sirolimus as an independent predictor of minimal fibrosis at year one, and year two. This is the first study among liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV to describe the positive impact of sirolimus in respect of reduced fibrosis extent and rate of progression.     

Recurrent hepatitis C virus disease after liver transplantation and concurrent biliary tract complications: poor outcome

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is particularly aggressive in the post-liver transplantation setting, with rapid progression of liver fibrosis. Biliary complications remain a significant cause of morbidity following liver transplantation. Post-cholecystectomy biliary strictures are associated with advanced hepatic fibrosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether the presence of biliary complications affects survival in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV disease. The files of liver transplant recipients (53.7% male; mean age 52.7+/-10.3 yr) were reviewed for incidence, type and treatment of biliary complications, and findings were compared between those who developed recurrent HCV disease (n=47, 83.9%) and those who did not (n=9). Twenty-one biliary complications developed in 12 patients with recurrent HCV (25.5%). Treatment with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with balloon dilatation and stent placement or surgical revision was successful in nine (75%). Three biliary complications developed in three patients with no recurrence (p=NS). There was no statistically significant association between recurrent HCV disease and biliary complications. However, among those with recurrent disease, the recurrence was severe in nine of 12 recipients with biliary complications (75%) but in only nine of 35 without biliary complications (26%) (p=0.001). Death was documented in eight patients with severe recurrence (44.4%), including three (37.5%) with biliary complications and two (7%) with non-severe recurrence, neither of whom had biliary complications (p=0.003). Antiviral treatment was successful in nine of 25 patients (36%) who received it. On multivariate analysis, biliary complications were a significant predictor of severe recurrence (OR 27.0, 95% confidence interval 2.07-351.4) (p=0.012). Fibrosis stage in the second biopsy was significantly correlated with serum alanine aminotransferase (p=0.01) and with duration of biliary obstruction (p=0.07). In conclusion, biliary complications of liver transplantation strongly affect outcome in patients with recurrent HCV disease despite attempts to relieve the biliary obstruction and to treat the recurrent HCV disease.     

Impact of donor age on survival and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation using HCV+ allografts.

Studies have suggested that the use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive (HCV+) donor allografts has no impact on survival. However, no studies have examined the effect that HCV+ donor histology has upon recipient and graft survival. We evaluated the clinical outcome and impact of histological features in HCV patients transplanted using HCV+ livers. We reviewed all patients transplanted for HCV at our institution from 1988 to 2004; 39 received HCV+ allografts and 580 received HCV-negative (HCV-) allografts. Survival curves compared graft and patient survival. Each HCV+ allograft was stringently matched to a control of HCV- graft recipients. No significant difference in survival was noted between recipients of HCV+ livers and controls. Patients receiving HCV+ allografts from older donors (age > or =50 yr) had higher rates of graft failure (hazard ratio, 2.74) and death rates (hazard ratio, 2.63) compared to HCV- allograft recipients receiving similarly-aged older donor livers. Matched case-control analysis revealed that recipients of HCV+ allografts had more severe fibrosis post-liver transplantation than recipients of HCV- livers (P = 0.008). More advanced fibrosis was observed in HCV+ grafts from older donors compared to HCV+ grafts from younger donors (P = 0.012). In conclusion, recipients of HCV+ grafts from older donors have higher rates of death and graft failure, and develop more extensive fibrosis than HCV- graft recipients from older donors. Recipients of HCV+ grafts, regardless of donor age, develop more advanced liver fibrosis than recipients of HCV- grafts.     

Detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in renal transplant recipients.

Non-A, non-B hepatitis is a significant cause of liver disease among renal allograft recipients. In order to assess the impact and prevalence of hepatitis C in a series of renal allograft recipients, we retrospectively screened 621 consecutive patients transplanted between 1979 and 1989 and 484 cadaver organ donors retrieved in the same interval for serologic evidence of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection using the enzyme-linked assay for anti-HCV antibody. Of 596 HBsAg negative patients, 180 (30%) were anti-HCV positive at the time of transplant. One-year posttransplant, 117 (22%) had detectable levels of anti-HCV antibody. Chemically significant hepatitis developed in 52/234 (22%) anti-HCV positive patients, and 26 of these followed a clinical course consistent with chronic hepatitis. Significantly more males and patients with antibody to HCV detectable at 1 year posttransplant were in the group experiencing an increase in liver enzymes. Ten-year patient and graft survival was 78% and 50%, respectively, for the anti-HCV positive patients who had an elevation of alanine aminotransferase, and 76% and 57% for the cohort maintaining normal liver function (P = NS). There were also no differences in patient and graft survival among the anti-HCV positive group and the consistently sero-negative patients. Of 484 cadaver organ donors with serum available for analysis (out of 1200 retrieved), 67 (14%) were anti-HCV positive at the time of organ donation. Among 23 anti-HCV negative kidney recipients who received a kidney from an HCV antibody positive donor, only one had seroconverted at 1 year posttransplant. Antibody to HCV appears to be widespread among renal transplant recipients and cadaver organ donors. We were unable to demonstrate any evidence of long-term adverse effects on patient and graft survival among anti-HCV positive patients employing the first generation anti-HCV assay.     

The impact of hepatitis C virus infection on liver disease in renal transplant recipients

Abstract To assess the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in renal transplant recipients and its impact on posttransplant liver disease, the sera from 176 recipients who had been followed for 1–20 years (mean 8.3 years) were tested for HCV-pecific antibody using enzyme immunoassay. HCV-pecific antibody was detected in 53 patients (30.1%) including 2 patients also positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Among 167 HBsAg-negative patients, the presence of HCV-pecific antibody was associated with an increased incidence of chemically significant hepatitis (70.6% vs. 9.5% in anti-HCV-negative patients, P<0.01). Hepatitis was more likely to be chronic in anti-HCV-positive patients than in anti-HCV-negative patients (P<0.05) Serious liver disease developed in 4 of 51 anti-HCV-positive, HBsAg-negative patients: liver failure causing death in 3 and hepatoma in 1. Liver biopsy specimens from anti-HCV-positive patients showed more aggressive histological lesions compared with those from anti-HCV-negative patients. We conclude that HCV infection is quite prevalent in our renal transplant recipients and plays a major role in posttransplant chronic liver disease.     

Outcomes of acute rejection after interferon therapy in liver transplant recipients.

Interferon alfa has been increasingly used against recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) disease in post-liver transplant (LT) recipients. A serious potential adverse effect is acute rejection. We reviewed our experience using interferon-based therapy (interferon or pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin) for treating recurrent HCV in LT recipients. Forty-four LT recipients were treated with interferon for recurrent HCV. Five of the 44 patients developed acute rejection during interferon-based therapy. These 5 patients started treatment of 42.4 +/- 33.89 months (mean +/- SD) after LT. Mean (+/- SD) histological activity index and fibrosis scores before initiating antiviral therapy were 8.8 (+/- 1.92) and 2.6 (+/- 0.55), respectively. Patients were treated for 3.3 +/- 2.28 months (mean +/- SD) prior to rejection. At the time of rejection, HCV load was not detectable in 4 of the 5 recipients. All 5 patients had tolerated interferon therapy, and none had stopped therapy because of adverse effects. The rejection was successfully treated in 3 patients. In 2 of those 3 patients, cirrhosis eventually developed. In the 2 patients who did not respond to rejection treatment, immediate graft failure occurred, leading to re-LT in 1 patient and death from sepsis in the other. In conclusion, the results indicate that further studies are needed to assess the safety of interferon in LT recipients. Interferon-based therapy may lead to acute rejection and subsequent graft loss and should therefore be used with caution. Treated recipients may also develop progressive cirrhosis despite achieving a sustained virological response.