Management of the multiple limb amputee

Issue : Multiple limb amputations involving at least one upper extremity are very uncommon. The amputation of both an upper and lower limb is even more uncommon. Due to the rarity of these amputations therapists are uncertain regarding the most appropriate treatment methods. While the majority of the protocols used for single limb amputations are appropriate for these multiple limb amputees, there are differences. Loss of multiple limbs creates a problem of overheating for the individual. Loss of an arm and leg results in difficulty donning the prostheses and difficulty using crutches and parallel bars during mobilization. Method : A review is given of 16 multiple limb amputees seen in our rehabilitation centre in the last 15 years. Return to work was seen in one third and was not related to the number of the amputations. A higher proportion of these multiple limb amputations occur through alcoholism or attempted suicide behaviour than occurs with either single upper limb amputations or lower limb amputations. This existing behaviour can create a management problem for the rehabilitation team during rehabilitation. Conclusion : Guidelines as to appropriate prosthetic and preprosthetic care are provided to assist the practitioner who has the acute and long term care of these patients. All multiple limb amputees should be referred to a specialized rehabilitation centre to discuss prosthetic options and long term rehabilitation requirements. This paper does not discuss bilateral lower limb amputations when not combined with an upper limb amputation.     

Management of the multiple limb amputee

Issue : Multiple limb amputations involving at least one upper extremity are very uncommon. The amputation of both an upper and lower limb is even more uncommon. Due to the rarity of these amputations therapists are uncertain regarding the most appropriate treatment methods. While the majority of the protocols used for single limb amputations are appropriate for these multiple limb amputees, there are differences. Loss of multiple limbs creates a problem of overheating for the individual. Loss of an arm and leg results in difficulty donning the prostheses and difficulty using crutches and parallel bars during mobilization.

Method : A review is given of 16 multiple limb amputees seen in our rehabilitation centre in the last 15 years. Return to work was seen in one third and was not related to the number of the amputations. A higher proportion of these multiple limb amputations occur through alcoholism or attempted suicide behaviour than occurs with either single upper limb amputations or lower limb amputations. This existing behaviour can create a management problem for the rehabilitation team during rehabilitation.

Conclusion : Guidelines as to appropriate prosthetic and preprosthetic care are provided to assist the practitioner who has the acute and long term care of these patients. All multiple limb amputees should be referred to a specialized rehabilitation centre to discuss prosthetic options and long term rehabilitation requirements. This paper does not discuss bilateral lower limb amputations when not combined with an upper limb amputation.     

Prosthetic rehabilitation in bilateral high above elbow amputation

Rehabilitation in patients with bilateral high above elbow amputation presents a considerable prosthetic problem. A patient with high upper arm amputations after a high-voltage injury is presented. He was successfully fitted with multifunctional myoelectric hand prostheses. The problems in rehabilitation of adult bilateral arm amputees are discussed and the value of fitting these patients with electrically powered prostheses is assessed. The balance between technical and clinical aspects is discussed in relation to patient acceptance. In our case good acceptance and functional benefit was noted. The fact is stressed that the bilateral upper extremity amputee can regain considerable physical function with the fitting of suitable prostheses, even if the limb remnants are short and provide little or no function. An extensive team approach at specialized centres will favour the results.     

Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature related to the advances that have taken place in the management and rehabilitation care of limb amputation. RESULTS: Prostheses for the lower and upper limb amputee have changed greatly over the past several years, with advances in components, socket fabrication and fitting techniques, suspension systems and sources of power and electronic controls. Higher levels of limb amputation can now be fitted with functional prostheses, which allow more patients to achieve independent life styles. This is of particular importance for the multi-limb amputee. The rehabilitation of more traditional lower limb levels of amputation have also greatly benefited from the technological advances including energy storing feet, electronic control hydraulic knees, ankle rotators and shock absorbers to mention a few. For the upper limb amputee, myoelectric and proportional controlled terminal devices and elbow joints are now used routinely in some rehabilitation facilities. Experimental prosthetic fitting techniques and devices such as the use of osseo-implantation for suspension of the prosthesis, tension control hands or electromagnetic fluids for knee movement control will also be briefly discussed in this paper. CONCLUSION: It is possible to conclude from this review that many advances have occurred that have greatly impacted the functional outcomes of patients with limb amputation.     

Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration

Purpose:?The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature related to the advances that have taken place in the management and rehabilitation care of limb amputation.

Results:?Prostheses for the lower and upper limb amputee have changed greatly over the past several years, with advances in components, socket fabrication and fitting techniques, suspension systems and sources of power and electronic controls. Higher levels of limb amputation can now be fitted with functional prostheses, which allow more patients to achieve independent life styles. This is of particular importance for the multi-limb amputee. The rehabilitation of more traditional lower limb levels of amputation have also greatly benefited from the technological advances including energy storing feet, electronic control hydraulic knees, ankle rotators and shock absorbers to mention a few. For the upper limb amputee, myoelectric and proportional controlled terminal devices and elbow joints are now used routinely in some rehabilitation facilities. Experimental prosthetic fitting techniques and devices such as the use of osseo-implantation for suspension of the prosthesis, tension control hands or electromagnetic fluids for knee movement control will also be briefly discussed in this paper.

Conclusion:?It is possible to conclude from this review that many advances have occurred that have greatly impacted the functional outcomes of patients with limb amputation.     

Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration

Purpose: The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature related to the advances that have taken place in the management and rehabilitation care of limb amputation.

Results: Prostheses for the lower and upper limb amputee have changed greatly over the past several years, with advances in components, socket fabrication and fitting techniques, suspension systems and sources of power and electronic controls. Higher levels of limb amputation can now be fitted with functional prostheses, which allow more patients to achieve independent life styles. This is of particular importance for the multi-limb amputee. The rehabilitation of more traditional lower limb levels of amputation have also greatly benefited from the technological advances including energy storing feet, electronic control hydraulic knees, ankle rotators and shock absorbers to mention a few. For the upper limb amputee, myoelectric and proportional controlled terminal devices and elbow joints are now used routinely in some rehabilitation facilities. Experimental prosthetic fitting techniques and devices such as the use of osseo-implantation for suspension of the prosthesis, tension control hands or electromagnetic fluids for knee movement control will also be briefly discussed in this paper.

Conclusion: It is possible to conclude from this review that many advances have occurred that have greatly impacted the functional outcomes of patients with limb amputation.     

Postacute care services use for dysvascular amputees: a population-based study of Massachusetts

OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation and other postacute care services utilization for persons with a lower limb amputations due to dysvascular disease is important information for physiatrists, therapists, patients, and health-policy planners. The purpose of this study was to examine rates of inpatient rehabilitation services use in a statewide population. DESIGN: Massachusetts Hospital Case Mix and Charge Data for 1997 were used to select persons with dysvascular limb amputations. Disposition locations after amputation were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 2487 persons who incurred a lower limb amputation, with the majority being white (94%), male (58%), and elderly (69 yrs). Most had diabetes (62%) or peripheral vascular disease (51%). The most common disposition was home (33%), with 16% receiving inpatient rehabilitation after amputation. Persons with transtibial and transfemoral amputations were the most likely to receive inpatient rehabilitation, 28% and 19% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sixteen percent of dysvascular amputees received inpatient rehabilitation services. This was higher than the 1997 rate for Maryland (12%) and suggests geographic differences in services utilization. Prospective studies are necessary to examine outcomes for persons receiving rehabilitation services in different care settings to define the optimal rehabilitation venue for functional restoration. Development of more specific International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification codes for dysvascular amputations would further research and public policy efforts.     

Fitting a bilateral transhumeral amputee with utensil prostheses and their functional assessment 10 years later: a case report

Traumatic transhumeral amputations resulting from electric burn injury are uncommon and present a significant rehabilitation challenge. Compensating for loss of fine, coordinated function of the upper extremities with prostheses is difficult medically, technologically, psychologically, and socially. We followed up a patient with traumatic bilateral transhumeral amputation who was fitted with specially designed bilateral low-temperature utensil prostheses for 10 years. A bilateral utensil prosthesis consists of 2 thermoplastic sockets, an elastic harness, 2 utensil holders, and several different utensils. The characteristics of utensil prostheses are low cost, quick fabrication, and responsiveness to a patient's needs. Ten years after the patient's first prosthesis fitting, he still used these specially designed prostheses. By using these devices and his feet, the patient has regained independence in most activities of daily living and gained a new working skill.     

The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: positive coping and minimizing feeling different

Purpose. Psychosocial factors are likely to play a crucial role in adjustment to upper limb amputation and prosthesis use, and yet have received only minimal exploration within the literature. This study therefore, sought to gain a rich understanding of the experience of living with an upper limb amputation and of using a prosthetic arm and hand.

Methods. The qualitative method of Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis was used. Purposive sampling culminated in a homogenous sample of 11 males with unilateral upper limb amputations, who wore a prosthesis at least weekly. Semi-structured interviews were carried out, transcribed and analysed according to the methodology.

Results. Participants identified a theme of ongoing awareness of difference in appearance and ability. Consequently, participants described themes of psychosocial and functional adjustment to minimize this sense of difference. This was facilitated by the participants' prostheses and their positive coping style. Within this, participants also identified the personal meanings of their prosthesis and highlighted the terms of its use. The minimization of their sense of difference resulted in participants regaining a sense of worth.

Conclusions. The findings offer a greater psychological insight into adjustment from an upper limb amputation and the role of prostheses. These findings have implications for both the clinical rehabilitation of patients who undergo upper limb amputations, as well as for future research into the use and value of prostheses in facilitating the adjustment to this experience.     

Inpatient Rehabilitation of Survivors of Purpura Fulminans With Multiple Limb Amputations: A Case Series

Shapiro LT, Huang ME. Inpatient rehabilitation of survivors of purpura fulminans with multiple limb amputations: a case series.Purpura fulminans (PF) is a rare, rapidly progressive syndrome characterized by intravascular thrombosis and necrosis of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Survivors are often left with considerable impairments, including organ dysfunction, adjustment disorder, extensive wounds, and amputations. This retrospective case series presents 4 adult patients who underwent multiple limb amputations secondary to acute infectious PF. All patients underwent acute inpatient rehabilitation, were fitted with prostheses during their stay, and achieved a minimal assistance level for most of their self-care and mobility skills. Rehabilitation management is discussed, including common medical issues, complications, and prosthetic considerations.     

Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services

OBJECTIVES: To examine the use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and satisfaction with prosthetist services in a large and diverse sample of persons with limb loss. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Persons aged 18 to 84 years identified from the Amputee Coalition of America registry as having a major upper- or lower-limb loss due to vascular disease, trauma, or malignancy. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and satisfaction with prosthetists' services, assessed via structured telephone interviews. RESULTS: Most persons (94.5%) surveyed had a prosthesis and used it extensively (71h/wk). Most persons with amputations appeared to be satisfied with the overall performance of their prostheses (75.7%). Nearly one third of them, however, expressed dissatisfaction with their prostheses' comfort. Frequency of prosthesis use and satisfaction with the device were significantly higher among those with shorter timing to first prosthesis fitting, even after controlling for a wide array of respondents' sociodemographic and amputation characteristics. Overall, persons with amputations in our sample had positive assessments of their prosthetists' quality. Less favorable ratings concerned items related to the prosthetists' interpersonal skills. Multivariate analyses showed that men and black persons with amputations were less likely than their female or white counterparts to have favorable perceptions about their prosthetists across all dimensions of provider quality. Persons with fewer years of schooling were also less likely to be satisfied with their prosthetist's interpersonal manner. There were no significant differences in prosthesis use, satisfaction, or assessment of prosthetists' quality based on amputation etiology or amputation level. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts should be directed at minimizing the interval from surgery to first prosthesis fitting and at improving communication between patients and prosthetists, to improve the quality of care provided to the growing numbers of persons with limb loss.     

Prosthetic rehabilitation of geriatric amputee patients: a follow-up study

During a four-year period, 116 lower extremity amputee patients older than 65 years were evaluated and treated by our department. Fifty-nine patients with below-knee (BK) amputations, 22 with above-knee (AK) amputations, and 15 with bilateral amputations were fitted with prostheses and trained in their use. A follow-up study on all patients was done at an average of 22 months after they had completed their training program but not earlier than after 6 months. Of all BK amputees who had been fitted with a prosthesis, 73% were using it fulltime and as their main mode of locomotion; 25% were using it part of the time. The results were less favorable for AK and for bilateral amputee patients: 50% of AK amputees and 33% of the bilateral amputees had become fulltime users of their prostheses. Age alone was not a major determining factor in success or failure of prosthetic rehabilitation. Failures usually were due to concurrent medical disease or mental deterioration. The study indicates that the effort and expense of fitting and training geriatric patients with prostheses may be well worthwhile.     

Cognitive functioning in persons with lower limb amputations: a review

Purpose: To review the literature on cognitive functioning in persons with lower limb amputations. Method: A search of the MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases was carried out. Results: Thirty papers were found that met the inclusion criteria. The studies were characterised by heterogeneity of design, methodological quality, sample characteristics, assessment of cognitive functioning, and outcomes examined. The research published to date suggests that cognitive impairment is more prevalent among persons with lower limb amputations than in the general population, and is linked with a number of important outcomes in this patient group, including mobility, prosthesis use, and maintenance of independence following amputation. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of assessing the cognitive abilities of persons with lower limb amputations. An understanding of the cognitive profile of these patients could assist rehabilitation teams in determining their suitability for prosthetic or wheelchair rehabilitation, ascertaining appropriate and realistic goals for rehabilitation, and tailoring rehabilitation programmes to patients' strengths so that maximal mobility and independence is achieved. [Box: see text].     

Rehabilitation and the long-term outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations

OBJECTIVE: To examine the long-term outcomes of persons undergoing trauma-related amputations, and to explore factors affecting their physical, social, and mental health and the role of inpatient rehabilitation in improving such outcomes. DESIGN: Abstracted medical records and interview data sought for a retrospective cohort of persons who had undergone a lower-limb trauma-related amputation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients identified with a principal or secondary diagnosis of a trauma-related amputation to the lower extremity at the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center between 1984 and 1994. Patients with spinal cord injury or traumatic brain injury were excluded. RESULTS: Of 146 patients who had trauma-related amputations to the lower limb at the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center during the study period, nearly 9% died during the acute admission and 3.5% died after discharge. About 87% of all trauma-related amputations involved males, and roughly three quarters involved white persons. About 80% of all amputations occurred before age 40. The health profile of traumatic amputee subjects interviewed in the study (n = 78, 68% response rate) was systematically lower than that of the general US population for all SF-36 scores. The differences in profiles were largest among SF-36 scales sensitive to differences in physical health status, particularly physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, and bodily pain. About one fourth of persons with a trauma-related amputation reported ongoing severe problems with the residual limb, including phantom pain, wounds, and sores. The number of inpatient rehabilitation nights significantly improved the ability of patients with amputation to function in their physical roles, increased vitality, and reduced bodily pain. Inpatient rehabilitation was also significantly correlated with improved vocational outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a substantial effect of inpatient rehabilitation in improving long-term outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations.     

Postoperative management of transtibial amputations in VA hospitals.

Rigid plaster dressings and immediate postoperative prostheses (IPOP) in patients undergoing transtibial amputations have been reported to reduce pain and healing time, prevent knee flexion contractures, and expedite early ambulation compared to soft dressings. Yet, despite the reported benefits, surgical adoption of (conventional) rigid dressings and IPOP has been inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to determine the current postoperative transtibial amputation dressing practices in VA hospitals. A six-item questionnaire was sent to 134 surgeons at the 117 VA hospitals where transtibial amputations were performed in fiscal year 1999. Responses were received from 83% of the surgeons. During the 1999 study year, surgeons performing transtibial amputations used soft dressings on 67% of patients, conventional rigid dressings with no intent to apply a foot attachment on 14% of patients, removable rigid dressings on 14% of patients, and IPOP (almost exclusively without a foot) on 5% of patients. The application of a rigid dressing or IPOP did not correlate well with the total number of transtibial amputations performed by the surgeon, hospital bed size, or academic affiliation.     

Adult acquired major upper limb amputation in Norway: prevalence,demographic features and amputation specific features. A population-based survey

Purpose.?To estimate the prevalence of adult acquired major upper limb amputation in Norway. To describe this amputee population regarding demographic features and amputation specific features. To compare our data to data collected internationally.

Method.?Population-based cross-sectional study on adult upper limb amputees with acquired limb loss through or proximal to the radio-carpal joint. Patients were found in the databases of the two companies in Norway that make upper limb prostheses and in the medical records of three of the largest Norwegian hospitals. Data were collected by postal questionnaires.

Results.?We estimated a population prevalence of 11.6 per 100,000 adults (n == 416). Our survey was not 100%% comprehensive and the estimate is conservative. The amputees were predominantly men with traumatic, unilateral, distal amputations at a young age. There were significant gender- and amputation level differences in cause. Most amputees had used prostheses. About four in ten were in paid employment.

Conclusions.?Our findings are mainly consistent with earlier studies from other countries. Implications of our findings related to the planning of future health care for these patients are outlined, including suggestion of regional multidisciplinary rehabilitation emphasising occupational rehabilitation and focus on preventive measures. Potential areas of follow-up are suggested.     

Bilateral below-knee amputations: experience with 80 patients

This review expands information concerning the bilateral below-knee (BK) amputee, describing the findings of a retrospective assessment of 80 such patients. Factors evaluated included etiology, associated conditions, time between amputations, late revisions, use of prostheses, and survival. In 63 patients both amputations were because of atherosclerosis. Of these patients, 86% were diabetic and 84% hypertensive. Peak incidence of the second amputation was during the 7th decade. Average time between amputations was 23 months. Forty-five (71%) of the atherosclerotic patients achieved some functional use of bilateral prostheses. The five patients employed at the time of the second amputation returned to work using prostheses. Average survival after the second amputation was 44 months for those deceased, and 64 months for those alive at the end of the study period. Nine patients had amputations because of various forms of injury, including one for sequential developments due to alcohol-related sensory loss. Eight of this group had a diagnosis of alcohol abuse of psychosis. Reasons for amputations included frostbite, burns, suicide attempt and sensory loss. Five achieved long-term but generally suboptimal prostheses use. The findings support the impression that most atherosclerotic bilateral BK amputees can use prostheses and that their survival and low rate of late stump revisions justify restorative efforts. Mental status was the major determinant of amputation and prostheses use among the non-atherosclerotic patients; discharge from psychiatric hospitals without adequate community support systems was probably contributory. Management and prevention require close collaboration between the rehabilitation, surgical, psychosocial, and public health disciplines.     

Return to work after lower limb amputation

Purpose. To review the literature on return to work after lower limb amputation.

Method. A comprehensive review of literature on return to work after lower limb amputation was carried out, searching MEDLINE and PubMED.

Results. Most authors found return-to-work rate to be about 66%. Between 22 and 67% of the subjects retained the same occupation, while the remainder had to change occupation. Post-amputation jobs were generally more complex with a requirement for a higher level of general educational development and were physically less demanding. The return to work depends on: general factors, such as age, gender and educational level; factors related to impairments and disabilities due to amputation (amputation level, multiple amputations, comorbidity, reason for amputation, persistent stump problems, the time from the injury to obtaining a permanent prosthesis, wearing comfort of the prosthesis, walking distance and restrictions in mobility); and factors related to work and policies (salary, higher job involvement, good support from the implementing body and the employer and social support network).

Conclusions. Subjects have problems returning to work after lower limb amputation. Many have to change their work and/or work only part-time. Vocational rehabilitation and counselling should become a part of rehabilitation programme for all subjects who are of working age after lower limb amputation. Better cooperation between professionals, such as rehabilitation team members, implementing bodies, company doctors and the employers, is necessary.     

Return to work after lower limb amputation

Purpose. To review the literature on return to work after lower limb amputation.

Method. A comprehensive review of literature on return to work after lower limb amputation was carried out, searching MEDLINE and PubMED.

Results. Most authors found return-to-work rate to be about 66%. Between 22 and 67% of the subjects retained the same occupation, while the remainder had to change occupation. Post-amputation jobs were generally more complex with a requirement for a higher level of general educational development and were physically less demanding. The return to work depends on: general factors, such as age, gender and educational level; factors related to impairments and disabilities due to amputation (amputation level, multiple amputations, comorbidity, reason for amputation, persistent stump problems, the time from the injury to obtaining a permanent prosthesis, wearing comfort of the prosthesis, walking distance and restrictions in mobility); and factors related to work and policies (salary, higher job involvement, good support from the implementing body and the employer and social support network).

Conclusions. Subjects have problems returning to work after lower limb amputation. Many have to change their work and/or work only part-time. Vocational rehabilitation and counselling should become a part of rehabilitation programme for all subjects who are of working age after lower limb amputation. Better cooperation between professionals, such as rehabilitation team members, implementing bodies, company doctors and the employers, is necessary.