Blood growth hormone-binding protein levels in premenopausal and postmenopausal women: roles of body weight and estrogen levels

A substantial proportion of GH circulates bound to high affinity GH-binding protein (GHBP), which corresponds to the extracellular domain of the GH receptor. Current evidence indicates that nutritional status has an important role in regulating plasma GHBP levels in humans. In the present study the relationship among plasma GHBP levels, body composition [by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)] and serum estradiol (E(2)) was evaluated in premenopausal (n = 92) and postmenopausal (n = 118) healthy women with different body weight [three groups according to body mass index (BMI): normal, 18.5-24.99; overweight, 25-29.99; obese, 30-39.99 kg/m(2)]. Plasma GHBP levels were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography gel filtration. GH and insulin-like growth factor I levels were determined by immunoradiometric assay and RIA, respectively. GHBP levels were significantly higher in premenopausal women with BMI above 25 kg/m(2) (overweight, 3.789 +/- 0.306 nmol/L; obese, 4.372 +/- 0.431 nmol/L) than those observed in postmenopausal women (overweight, 1.425 +/- 0.09 nmol/L; obese, 1.506 +/- 0.177 nmol/L). No significant differences were found between normal weight premenopausal (1.741 +/- 0.104 nmol/L) and postmenopausal (1.524 +/- 0.202 nmol/L) women. In premenopausal women GHBP levels correlated positively with BMI (r = 0.675; P < 0.001), fat mass (FM; r = 0.782; P < 0.001; by BIA; r = 0.776; P < 0.001; by DEXA), truncal fat (TF; r = 0.682; P < 0.001), waist to hip circumference ratio (WHR; r = 0.551; P < 0.001), and E(2) (r = 0.298; P < 0.05), whereas no significant correlation was found in postmenopausal women between GHBP levels and BMI, FM, TF, WHR, or E(2). In normal weight pre- and postmenopausal women GHBP levels did not change between the ages of 20 and 69 yr. No statistically significant correlation was found between GHBP and age for all groups studied. Moreover, in two distinct subgroups of pre- and postmenopausal women, aged 40-49 yr, the direct relationship between GHBP levels and all indexes of adiposity were only observed in premenopausal women [BMI: r = 0.836; P < 0.001; FM: r = 0.745 (BIA) and r = 0.832 (DEXA); P < 0.001; TF: r = 0.782; P < 0.001; WHR: r = 0.551; P < 0.05], but not in postmenopausal women. In conclusion, the present data indicate a strong direct correlation between GHBP and body fat in premenopausal, but not in postmenopausal women, whereas they failed to detect a relationship between GHBP and age. Therefore, these results suggest that endogenous estrogen status may be an important determinant of the changes in GHBP levels in women with different body weights.     

Growth hormone binding protein correlates strongly with leptin and percentage body fat in GH-deficient adults, is increased by GH replacement but does not predict IGF-I response.

GH-binding protein (GHBP) corresponds to the extracellular domain of the GH receptor (GHR) and has been shown to be closely related to body fat. This study aimed to examine the inter-relationship between GHBP, leptin and body fat, and to test the hypothesis that GHBP is modified by GH replacement in GH-deficient adults and predicts IGF-I response. Twenty adults, mean age 47 years (range 20-69) with proven GH deficiency were randomly allocated to either GH (up to 0.25 U/kg/week in daily doses) or placebo for 3 months before cross-over to the opposite treatment. Plasma GHBP and leptin were measured at baseline and 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after each treatment. Whole body composition was measured at baseline by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). There was a strong correlation between baseline leptin and GHBP (r = 0.88, P < 0.0001) and between baseline GHBP and percentage body fat, (r = 0.83, P < 0.0001). Mean GHBP levels were higher on GH compared with placebo, 1.53 +/- 0.28 vs 1.41 +/- 0.25nM, P = 0.049. There was no correlation between baseline IGF-I and GHBP (r = -0.049, P = 0.84), and GHBP did not predict IGF-I response to GH replacement. The close inter-relationship between GHBP, leptin and body fat suggests a possible role for GHBP in the regulation of body composition. GHBP is increased by GH replacement in GH-deficient adults, but does not predict biochemical response to GH replacement.     

High-affinity growth hormone (GH)-binding protein (GHBP), body fat mass, and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 predict the GHBP response to GH therapy in adult GH deficiency syndrome

The study objective was to investigate which baseline factors can accurately predict plasma high-affinity growth hormone (GH)-binding protein (GHBP) levels after GH replacement therapy in patients with GH deficiency (GHD). The study group consisted of 36 GHD patients (22 men and 14 women; mean age, 43.1 years; (range, 21 to 60) known to have adult-onset GHD for many years (range, 4 to 22). They were randomly divided into a GH-treated group (n = 19) and a placebo group (n = 17). Body composition (assessed by bioelectrical impendance analysis [BIA]), plasma GHBP (fast protein liquid chromatography [FPLC] size-exclusion gel chromatography), insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and IGF-binding protein-3 ([IGFBP-3] radioimmunoassays) were measured before and after 6 months. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis with the plasma GHBP level after 6 months as the dependent variable was used to unravel significant explanatory (or predictor) variables. In contrast to placebo therapy, GH replacement therapy increased the mean plasma levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 to the normal range, whereas a small but statistically significant increase in plasma GHBP was observed. The combination of baseline plasma GHBP, body fat mass, and IGFBP-3 predicts posttreatment GHBP levels accurately (adjusted R2 = .97), indicating that baseline variables such as age, gender, fat-free mass, and IGF-I have no contribution. Furthermore, reliability analysis showed that the observed and predicted values for GHBP fit a strict parallel model. These findings indicate that the variations in body fat mass and IGFBP-3 among adult GHD subjects explain the reported variable response of GHBP to GH replacement therapy.     

Intersubject responsiveness of high-affinity growth hormone (GH)-binding protein (GHBP) to long-term GH replacement therapy

In adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) syndrome responsiveness to GH replacement therapy is reported to vary considerably. The underlying mechanisms, however, are not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate which baseline variables determine the reported variable intersubject responsiveness of high-affinity GH-binding protein (GHBP) to GH replacement therapy. In the setting of a double blind study over 12 months with placebo control over the first 6 months, we analyzed the interrelationship between a number of baseline variables, which vary considerably amongst subjects, and the GHBP response to GH replacement in 31 GHD adults (21 males and 10 females). The following variables were investigated: age, gender, duration of GHD, body composition, serum levels of high-affinity GHBP, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3). The results showed that in the 6 months treated group of 16 patients (11 males, 5 females), serum IGF-1 increased from 87 ng/ml (range: 26 to 173) to 250 (range: 62 to 467) (p<0.01) and GHBP increased from 1,302 pmol/l (range: 845 to 1,m960) to 1418 (range: 941 to 2,025) (p=0.04). Both parameters showed a significant time effect (within-subjects) (p<0.001). In the 12 months treated group of 15 patients (10 males, 5 females), serum IGF-1 increased from 92 ng/ml (range: 20 to 180) to 272 (range: 45 to 491) (p<0.01), whereas GHBP did not show a significant change: from 1,186 pmol/l (range: 660 to 1,690) to 1,252 (range: 580 to 1,890) (p=0.87). Also no significant time effect (within-subjects) was observed for GHBP (p=0.06). Step-wise multiple regression analyses revealed that during the 6 months placebo period baseline GHBP explained 83% of the variance in post-placebo GHBP, whereas the variance in post-treatment GHBP could be accurately predicted (adjusted R2=0.93) from baseline GHBP and body fat mass, irrespective of the duration of GH treatment. No other baseline variables contributed independently to the GHBP response, with the exception of IGFBP-3, which showed a small, but significant contribution in females, but not in males. These findings indicate that the variable intersubject responsiveness of GHBP to GH replacement therapy is mainly due to differences in baseline body fat mass amongst adult GHD patients, and that in female patients a relatively low baseline IGFBP-3 contributes to a rise in serum GHBP after GH treatment. The clinical relevance of measuring GHBP in adult GHD patients is limited to the first screening step to diagnose GHD, because long-term GH therapy tends to restore serum GHBP to pretreatment levels.     

Total body composition in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency before and after its administration

Effect of growth hormone (GH) on the growth and development of children is generally known. Effects of GH in adults are favorable, though. The aim of the work was to verify effects of GH administration on body composition in adult patients with GH deficit (GHD). The authors examined 15 adult patients with GHD originated in 13 of them in adulthood and in two of them in childhood. Their mean age was 43.9 +/- 11.3 years, the mean body mass was 80.0 +/- 15.2 kg. The GH deficit was verified by the stimulation insulin tolerance test. For the period of 12 months, they were subcutaneously administered recombinant human GH in a substitution dose of 0.5 to 1.5 IU/m2 body surface/day. A stable substitution of the hormone was applied for the period of at least six months in all these patients provided any deficit of other hormones had not been demonstrated. The examination by whole-body dosimeter Lunar DPX-L was made in the patients before the GH treatment began and after 12 months of therapy. It enabled to determine the amount of lean body mass (LBM) and fatty mass. After 12 months of GH treatment the mean level of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) was increased (P = 0.002). A statistically significant increase of total LBM (48.6 +/- 9.8 vs. 50.8 +/- 9.9 kg, P = 0.004) developed, the fatty mass did not change. Nine of these 15 patients were further followed and the administration of GH proceeded for six months. The densitometric examination was repeated, but no change of LBM was observed. The administration of GH was halted and after the period of 12 months the whole-body densitometric examination was done. The increase of LBM lasted. The amount of fat mass did not change, a decrease of fatty mass was observed after the GH administration ended. After 12 months of GH treatment there was also an increase of maximal output reached on bicycle ergometer (157.3 +/- 34.2 vs. 197.5 +/- 68.1 W, P = 0.006). A positive correlation between LBM and maximal output reached on bicycle ergometer before GH administration (r = 0.58, P = 0.02) was observed. A favorable effect of the substitution dose of GS administered to adult patients with GHD on the increase of LBM and physical output was confirmed.     

Leptin, insulin sensitivity and growth hormone binding protein in chronic heart failure with and without cardiac cachexia.

OBJECTIVE: Regulation of growth hormone (GH) receptor expression and hence tissue GH sensitivity may be important for the conflicting results found in treatment studies with recombinant growth hormone in chronic heart failure (CHF). Growth hormone-binding protein (GHBP) corresponds to the extracellular domain of the GH receptor and is closely related to measures of body composition and, specifically, to size of visceral fat tissue. Leptin, the adipocyte specific (ob) gene product, has been proposed as the signal linking adipose tissue and GHBP/GH-receptor expression. CHF has recently been shown to be a hyperleptinaemic and insulin-resistant state regardless of aetiology. This study aimed to examine the influence of leptin on GHBP in CHF patients with and without cardiac cachexia compared with healthy control subjects. METHODS: We studied 47 male patients with CHF (mean age 61+/-2 years, New York Heart Association (NYHA)-class 2.7+/-0.1, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 28+/-2%, peak oxygen consumption 16.8+/-0.9 ml/kg/min) and 21 male healthy controls of similar age. Of the CHF patients, 19 were cachectic (cCHF; non-oedematous weight loss >7.5% over at least 6 months) and 28 non-cachectic (ncCHF; similar for age and LVEF). Insulin sensitivity was assessed by an intravenous glucose tolerance test using the minimal model approach. RESULTS: Compared with healthy controls, patients had elevated levels of leptin (7.6+/-0.7 vs 4.8+/-0.7 ng/ml, P<0.05), insulin (76.2+/-8.9 vs 41.4+/-6.0 pmol/l, P<0.01), and reduced insulin sensitivity (2.43+/-0.2 vs 3.48+/-0.3 min(-1).microU.ml(-1).10(4), P<0.005) but similar GHBP levels (901+/-73 vs 903+/-95 pmol/l). Leptin levels were increased in ncCHF (9.11+/-1.0 ng/ml, P=0.001) but were not different from normal in cCHF (5.32+/-0.7 ng/ml, P>0.5). After correction for total body fat mass, both ncCHF and cCHF were hyperleptinaemic (41.8+/-3.8 and 37.9+/-0.38 vs 24.4+/-2.1 ng/ml/100 g, ANOVA P=0.001). In both patients and controls there was a direct correlation between leptin levels and GHBP (r=0.70 and r=0.71 respectively, both P<0.0001). This relationship was stronger than between GHBP and several parameters of body composition (body mass index (BMI), total and regional body fat mass or % body fat) and held true when sub-groups were tested individually (ncCHF r=0.62, P<0.001; cCHF r=0.79, P<0.0001). In multivariate regression analysis in all CHF patients, serum leptin levels emerged as the strongest predictor of GHBP, independent of age, BMI, total and regional fat mass or % body fat, fasting insulin level and insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Fat mass corrected leptin levels are elevated in CHF patients with and without cachexia. Reduced total fat mass may account for lower leptin levels in cachectic CHF patients compared with non cachectic patients. Leptin strongly predicts GHBP levels in CHF regardless of its hyperleptinaemic state or severely altered body composition as in cardiac cachexia. Leptin could be the signalling link between adipose tissue and GHBP/GH receptor expression in CHF.     

Impact of gender and androgen status on IGF-I levels in normal and GH-deficient adults

OBJECTIVE: The regulation of IGF-I levels is complex and not only dependent on GH status, as the diagnostic sensitivity of serum IGF-I levels for GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is low. Other GH-related parameters have so far not proven to be of additional diagnostic value in GHD adults. In the present study we evaluated the impact of gender and androgen status on IGF-I levels and the diagnostic value of IGF-I and GH-related parameters in a population of adult hypopituitary patients and age- and gender-matched healthy subjects. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Fifty-nine GHD patients (40 males, mean age 39.3+/-1.7 (s.e.m.) years, and 19 females, mean age 41.9+/-2.6 years) and 69 healthy subjects (42 males, mean age 36. 7+/-1.5 years, and 27 females, mean age 38.9+/-2.1 years). RESULTS: IGF-I levels were low in the GHD patients (91+/-7 vs 173+/-7 microgram/l, P<0.001), and lower in female patients than in male (68+/-10 vs 100+/-8 microgram/l, P=0.03). In the control group there was no gender-related difference in IGF-I levels (males: 178+/-8, females: 164+/-12 microgram/l, P=0.23). IGF-II and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were also decreased in GHD without any gender-related differences. GH-binding protein (GHBP) levels were increased in the patient group. The diagnostic sensitivity (%) of IGF-I, IGF-I/GHBP, IGF-I/IGFBP-3, and of the combination of IGF-I plus IGF-II (both low or one normal and one low), was higher in female patients than in male (IGF-I: 57.8 vs 22.0, P<0.0001; IGF-I/GHBP: 84.2 vs 48.8, P=0. 002; IGF-I/IGFBP-3: 36.8 vs 7.3 P=0.001; IGF-I+IGF-II: 77.8 vs 52.6, P=0.01). Testosterone levels were reduced in the female patients compared with female controls (0.5+/-0.3 vs 2.1+/-0.2nmol/l, P<0.001). Forward regression analyses revealed that IGFBP-3 was a significant predictor of IGF-I levels in both patients and healthy subjects. In a combined analysis of both patients and controls, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) level was the main contributor as an explanatory variable. Gender and prolactin also predicted IGF-I in patients, whereas SHBG and estradiol were significant predictors only in the control group. CONCLUSION: (i) Levels of IGF-I, and of IGF-I/IGFBP-3 and IGF-I/GHBP ratios are lower in females compared with male adult GHD patients. (ii) IGF-I/GHBP has a high diagnostic sensitivity of adult GHD, in particular in women. (iii) We hypothesize that the gender difference in IGF-I levels among adult GHD patients are causally related to the very low androgen levels observed among females.     

A comparison of circulating and regional growth hormone-binding protein in cirrhosis.

The growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis is disturbed in cirrhosis, with elevated basal GH and low IGF-I levels relating to liver function and prognosis. In plasma, GH is bound to a high-affinity GH-binding protein (GHBP), which has been found to be slightly reduced in cirrhosis, but with huge variations. GHBP is identical to the extracellular part of the hepatic GH receptor, but other tissues may contribute to the circulating GHBP levels. The aim was therefore to measure circulating and regional concentrations of GHBP in relationship to hepatic function and body composition in patients with cirrhosis (n = 38) and controls with normal liver function (n = 29). Blood samples from the hepatic, renal, and femoral veins and the femoral artery were collected simultaneously during a hemodynamic investigation. Plasma GHBP was directly measured by a specific and sensitive fluoroimmunoassay. Circulating GHBP levels were identical in the patients and controls (mean +/- SD) 1.03 +/- 0.56 nmol/L and 1.02 +/- 0.55 nmol/L, respectively (not significant). We found no significant hepatic, renal, or peripheral arteriovenous extractions or generations of GHBP, and it did not significantly correlate to liver function. In the controls, GHBP correlated significantly with body mass index (BMI) (r =.60, P <.005), whereas this relationship was not found in the patients with cirrhosis. In conclusion, high-affinity GHBP appears to be normal in patients with cirrhosis, with no significant hepatic generation or renal extraction and no association with the severity of the liver disease. Thus, our study supports the hypothesis that tissues other than the liver, despite its abundant GH receptors, may contribute to the circulating GHBP.     

Body composition and circulating levels of insulin, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 and growth hormone (GH)-binding protein affect the pharmacokinetics of GH in adults independently of age

The aim of our study was to scrutinize the association among age, body composition, and GH status in healthy adults. Using two-step, primed constant infusions of GH during suppression of endogenous GH secretion with octreotide in a group of 26 healthy nonobese men [mean age, 37.3 yr (range, 22-55 yr); body mass index, 24.6 +/- 0.4 kg/m(-2)] we investigated the contributions of age, body composition, insulin, and binding proteins to the variability in the pharmacokinetics and acute actions of GH. All subjects were investigated twice, with the infusion rates of GH calculated according to either total body weight or intraabdominal fat mass. Body composition was determined using computed tomography and bioimpedance measurements. There was no correlation between age and body weight, yet strong positive correlations were observed between age and intraabdominal fat area (r = 0.78; P < 0.0001) and waist to hip ratio (r = 0.71; P < 0.0001) and to a lesser degree to sc fat area (r = 0.42; P < 0.03). The between-subject variability in steady state GH levels was significantly larger when GH was administered per cm(2) intraabdominal fat area than per kg BW (P < 0.001). During primed constant infusions of GH at rates of 1.5 and 3.0 microg/kg x h, the corresponding MCRs of GH were 148.8 +/- 5.4 and 89.8 +/- 2.4 ml/min x m(-2), respectively, and the MCRs were inversely related to the achieved steady state GH levels (P < 0.0001). The MCR was unrelated to age, but was negatively correlated to baseline concentrations of IGF-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1; r = -0.53, P < 0.01) and positively correlated to basal levels of insulin (r = 0.46; P < 0.05), GH-binding protein (GHBP; r = 0.52; P < 0.01), IGFBP-3 (r = 0.47; P < 0.05), and total body fat (r = 0.44; P < 0.05). GH infusion caused significant changes in the concentrations of IGF-I, free fatty acids, GHBP, IGFBP-1, and insulin, but none of these effects was correlated to age. Based on our results we conclude that 1) the clearance of GH is concentration dependent; 2) the pharmacokinetics and acute effects of GH are not affected by age per se; and 3) basal levels of insulin, IGFBP-1, and GHBP as well as age-related changes in body composition are important predictors of GH pharmacokinetics.     

The study of spontaneous GH secretion after 36-h fasting distinguishes between GH-deficient and normal adults

OBJECTIVE: Within an appropriate clinical context, GH deficiency (GHD) in adults can only be diagnosed biochemically by provocative testing. The evaluation of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and even of spontaneous GH secretion do not establish the diagnosis of adult GHD. In fact, remarkable overlaps between normal and GHD adults have been reported for all these parameters. On the other hand, it is well known that even short-term fasting stimulates GH secretion in normal subjects. The aim of our study was to determine the effects of 36 h fasting on 8-h diurnal GH, insulin and glucose levels as well as on basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3, acid-labile subunit (ALS), IGFBP-1, GHBP and free fatty acid (FFA) levels. SUBJECTS: We studied 9 GHD adults (GHD, 8 males, 1 female; age, mean +/- SEM: 37.6 +/- 2.3 years, body mass index (BMI): 24.5 +/- 1.0 kg/m2) and 20 age-matched normal subjects (NS) as controls (13 males, 7 females; age: 28.9 +/- 0.6 years, BMI: 21.6 +/- 0.4 kg/m2). STUDY DESIGN: In all subjects we studied the effects of 36 h fasting on 8-h daytime GH, insulin and glucose levels (assay every 30 min from 0800 h to 1600 h) as well as on basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS, IGFBP-1, GHBP and FFA levels. RESULTS: Before fasting, basal mean IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and ALS levels in GHD were lower (P < 0. 0001) than in NS. IGFBP-1, GHBP and FFA levels were similar in both groups. Before fasting mean GH concentration (mGHc) in GHD was lower (P < 0.05) than in NS (0.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6 mu/l) but with a clear overlap between the 2 groups (range 0.4-0.8 vs. 0.4-6.8 mu/l). After fasting, both in GHD and NS basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS and GHBP levels did not change significantly. On the other hand, in both GHD and in NS IGFBP-1 was increased (P < 0.0001) to a similar extent, while FFA increased in NS more (P < 0.01) than in GHD. Fasting significantly increased mGHc in NS (12.0 +/- 1.2 mu/l, P < 0.0001) but not in GHD (0.6 +/- 0.2 mu/l). After fasting, no overlap was present between GHD and NS (0.4-1.6 vs. 2.4-20.8 mu/l, respectively). Mean glucose and insulin concentrations over 8 h in GHD and NS in basal conditions were similar and were reduced to the same extent in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that after short-term fasting, the study of spontaneous GH secretion distinguishes between GH-deficient adults and normal subjects; this phenomenon occurs before significant changes in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. These results suggest that the assessment of spontaneous GH secretion could be useful for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency only after short-term fasting.     

Survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, with radiation-induced GH deficiency, exhibit hyperleptinaemia and impaired insulin sensitivity, unaffected by 12 months of GH treatment

OBJECTIVE: Adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) often exhibit GH deficiency (GHD), due to prophylactic cranial radiotherapy (CRT). It is not known whether the observed risk for adiposity in these patients is associated with impaired insulin sensitivity and whether the insulin sensitivity is affected by GH replacement therapy. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: Eleven patients with GHD (median age 29 years), previously given prophylactic CRT for ALL, and 11 sex-, age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls were investigated with bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and analysis of serum leptin, serum free fatty acids (FFA) and serum insulin. Insulin sensitivity was measured by a euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp technique (IS-clamp). Moreover, the effects of 12 months of individually titrated GH treatment (median dose 0.5 mg/day) on these parameters were investigated. RESULTS: At baseline, the patients had lower fat free mass (FFM) (P = 0.003), higher percentage fat mass (FM) (P = 0.05), serum insulin (P = 0.02) and serum leptin/kg FM (P = 0.01) than controls. The patients had a tendency towards impaired IS-clamp (P = 0.06), which disappeared after correction for body composition (IS-clamp/kg FFM; P > 0.5). In the patients, time since CRT was positively correlated with percentage FM (r = 0.70, P = 0.02), and there was an independent negative association between serum FFA and IS-clamp (P = 0.05). Twelve months of GH treatment increased serum IGF-I (P = 0.003) and FFM (P = 0.02) and decreased percentage FM (P = 0.03), but no significant changes were seen in serum leptin/kg FM, serum FFA, FFA-clamp, serum insulin or IS-clamp (all, P > or = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Young adult survivors of childhood ALL with GHD had increased fat mass, hyperleptinaemia and impaired insulin sensitivity, which could be a consequence of radiation-induced impairment of GH secretion or mediated by other hypothalamic dysfunctions, such as leptin resistance or other unknown factors, affected by CRT. Twelve months of individualized GH replacement therapy led to positive effects on body composition, but the hyperleptinaemia, hyperinsulinaemia and the impaired insulin sensitivity remained unchanged.     

The relationship of ghrelin to biochemical and anthropometric markers of adult growth hormone deficiency

INTRODUCTION: Ghrelin is the natural ligand of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) and potently stimulates GH release in humans. Ghrelin is found in the hypothalamus, but most circulating ghrelin is derived from the stomach. Ghrelin stimulates food intake but circulating levels are low in obesity. We hypothesized that GH deficiency (GHD) might be associated with increased circulating ghrelin concentrations as a result of low GH levels. We therefore measured circulating ghrelin concentrations, leptin and body composition in subjects with GHD and healthy controls. METHODS: Subjects with GHD (n = 18) were compared to healthy control subjects (n = 18), matched for body mass index (BMI). They underwent assessment of body composition [waist circumference, BMI and percentage body fat (using bioimpedance)]. Plasma ghrelin, leptin, insulin, GH and IGF-1 were measured in the fasting state. Plasma ghrelin was measured using a specific radioimmunassay, and the other hormones using commercially available assays. RESULTS: The groups were well-matched for BMI (GHD vs. control; 32.9 +/- 10.8 vs. 31.3 +/- 11.7, P = ns) and waist circumference (GHD vs. control; 102.9 +/- 20.0 vs. 99.8 +/- 25.2, P = ns), but percentage body fat (GHD vs. control; 37.0 +/- 9.1 vs. 29.4 +/- 13.0, P = 0.06) tended to be higher in the GHD group. As expected, IGF-1 was lower in GHD (GHD vs. control; 12.5 +/- 6.8 vs. 19.2 +/- 5.8 nmol/l, P = 0.003). Ghrelin [GHD vs. controls; geometric mean (95% CI); 828.8 (95% CI 639.9-1074.2) vs. 487.9 (95% CI 297.2-800.2) pmol/l] and leptin [GHD vs. controls; 13.2 (95% CI 6.6-26.5) vs. 7.9 (95% CI 3.7-16.9) ng/ml] were similar in the two groups. Plasma ghrelin correlated inversely with waist circumference and waist hip ratio in GHD subjects (r = -0.6, P = 0.02) but not with IGF-1 or GH concentrations. There was no significant correlation in the control subjects. CONCLUSION: Circulating ghrelin concentrations are influenced by body fat distribution, but not by levels of either GH or IGF-1. However, given that obesity is associated with reduced ghrelin concentrations and that GHD is commonly associated with increased body fat, it is possible that these two opposing influences on circulating ghrelin levels result in normal concentrations in subjects with GHD.     

Serum levels of growth hormone binding protein in children with normal and precocious puberty: relation to age, gender, body composition and gonadal steroids

AIM: To study the regulation of GHBP serum levels by gonadal steroids in normal and precocious puberty. STUDY PROTOCOL: We studied GHBP levels in relation to age, sex, pubertal maturation, body composition as well as to circulating IGF-I and gonadal steroid levels in 320 healthy children. Furthermore, we studied the regulation of circulating GHBP in 33 girls with central precocious puberty before and during gonadal suppression with GnRH agonist. METHODS: GHBP was determined by a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (GHBP TR-FIA) based on a commercially available immunoassay for GH, the DELFIA GH assay. RESULTS: In healthy children GHBP levels were significantly higher in normal girls compared with boys, and there was no significant increase in GHBP in puberty in both sexes. GHBP levels did not correlate with height (SDS), age, pubertal stage, IGF-I or testosterone/oestradiol levels in boys and girls, respectively. There were significant correlations between BMI and GHBP in boys and girls (R 2 = 0.14 and R 2 = 0.12, both P < 0.0001). Furthermore, GHBP correlated highly significantly with the percentage body fat, determined by BIA in 43 healthy girls (R 2 = 0. 40, P < 0.0001). GHBP levels were significantly higher in girls with central precocious puberty (CPP) (1.31 SDS (1.26), mean (SD)) compared to prepubertal controls (P < 0.0001), and above + 2 SD in 10 out of 33 patients. In girls with CPP, GHBP correlated inversely with oestradiol before treatment (R 2 = 0.26, P < 0.01) and there was a tendency towards a positive correlation with BMI (R 2 = 0.13, P = 0.078). By contrast, there were no signficant correlations between GHBP and IGF-I or height SDS. Gonadal suppression with GnRH agonist treatment caused a transient significant increase of 0.57 SD after 2 months of treatment (P < 0.001), but decreased to baseline levels hereafter. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in children, as in adults, body fat is the primary determinant for the circulating level of GHBP, and that the difference in body fat is probably the main factor for the higher levels of serum GHBP in girls compared with boys, as well as for the negative influence of testosterone levels in boys and of oestrogen levels in girls. The elevation in GHBP levels observed in girls with central precocious puberty is probably due their higher body fat content.     

Characterization of the metabolic phenotypes of Cushing's syndrome and growth hormone deficiency: a study of body composition and energy metabolism

OBJECTIVE: A comparison of the severity and distribution of perturbations in body composition and their relationship to energy metabolism in glucocorticoid excess and GH deficiency (GHD) has not been undertaken before. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of Cushing's syndrome (CS) and GHD on whole and regional body composition and energy metabolism. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study design. PATIENTS: Eighteen subjects with CS (12 women, aged = 41.5 +/- 3.0 years, 24-h urinary free cortisol = 1601 +/- 361 nmol/day, normal < 300 nmol/day), 22 subjects with GHD (14 women, age = 42.9 +/- 2.9 years) and 18 normal subjects (11 women, age = 46.8 +/- 2.8 years). MEASUREMENTS: Lean body mass (LBM), fat mass (FM) and regional body composition were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Resting energy expenditure (REE) and fat oxidation (Fox) were assessed by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Mean percentage FM was significantly greater by 30% in CS (P = 0.002) and 22% in GH-deficient subjects (P = 0.014) than in normal subjects. LBM was significantly lower by 15% in CS (P = 0.002) and 11% in GHD (P = 0.013). In CS, the proportion of lean tissue in the limbs was 12% less than in normal (P = 0.001) and GH-deficient subjects (P = 0.0005). Truncal fat represented a greater proportion of total FM in CS (52.5 +/- 1.8%vs. 46.9 +/- 1.3%, P = 0.014) than in normal subjects, but not in GHD. REE and Fox, corrected for LBM, were significantly lower in GHD (P < 0.02 for both vs. normal) but not in CS. CONCLUSION: FM was higher and LBM lower in both CS and GHD. However, there is a greater abnormality of regional body composition in patients with CS who exhibit a lower limb lean mass and a greater truncal fat. Reduced REE and Fox contribute to increased adiposity in GHD. As REE and Fox are not perturbed in CS, other mechanisms must explain the marked gain in truncal and total fat.     

A low individualized GH dose in young patients with childhood onset GH deficiency normalized serum IGF-I without significant deterioration in glucose tolerance

OBJECTIVE: Many GH deficient (GHD) patients have impaired glucose tolerance and GH substitution in these patients has caused deleterious effects on glucose tolerance with hyperinsulinaemia. This further impairment of glucose tolerance might be due to an unphysiologically high dose of GH. Whether such a deterioration can be avoided by an optimal GH replacement dose is not known. In most previous studies, the GH dose was calculated according to body weight or body surface area and not adjusted according to the serum IGF-I response. DESIGN: The study was of open design and investigations were performed before the start of GH substitution and after nine months of treatment. The GH dose was adjusted according to the response in serum IGF-I, and in patients with sub-normal serum IGF-I levels (all but two) we aimed for a serum IGF-I level in the middle of the normal range. The median GH dose at the end of the study was 0.14 IU/kg/week. PATIENTS: Ten patients, eight males and two females, with childhood onset GHD were examined. Their median age was 27 years (range 21-28). MEASUREMENTS: Overnight and 24-h fasting levels of glucose, insulin and IGFBP-1 were measured. Directly after the 24-h fast an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), with measurements of glucose, insulin and IGFBP-1 was performed. An intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) was performed after overnight fasting. Body composition was measured with bio-impedance analysis (BIA) and quality of life was assessed using a self-rating questionnaire, Qol-AGHDA. RESULTS: After GH treatment, there were no significant changes in glucose tolerance, measured by overnight and 24-h fasting levels of glucose, insulin and IGFBP-1, an oral glucose tolerance test (after 24-h fasting) and an intravenous glucose tolerance test (after overnight fasting). Percentage fat mass and BMI correlated negatively with both the 24 h fasting IGFBP-1 levels and the IGFBP-1 responses after the OGTT. All patients decreased their percentage of fat mass measured by BIA [median -2.9%; range -1.0-(-6.6); P = 0.005]. The administered GH dose correlated negatively with the relative change in whole body resistance (r = -0.66; P = 0.04). All, but one of the patients improved their quality of life score after GH therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In a group of young patients with childhood onset GH deficiency, 9 months of treatment with a low GH dose (median 0.14 IU/kg/week) caused no significant deterioration of glucose tolerance. The strong negative associations between BMI or percentage fat mass and IGFBP-1 suggest that serum IGFBP-1 is more closely related than insulin to body composition in GH deficient patients. It is important to consider which critical endpoints should determine the GH dose. We would suggest that, apart for normalizing the serum IGF-I level, another main endpoint should be normalization of, or at least avoidance of any deterioration in glucose tolerance.     

Growth hormone versus placebo treatment for one year in growth hormone deficient adults: increase in exercise capacity and normalization of body composition

OBJECTIVE Studies with GH substitution in GH-deficient (GHD) adults lasting more than 6 months have so far been uncontrolled. End-points such as physical fitness and body composition may be subject to a considerable placebo effect which weakens the validity of open studies. We therefore tested GH (2 IU/m² per day) versus placebo treatment for 12 months. DESIGN Twenty-nine patients (mean age 45.5±2.0 years) with adult-onset GHD were studied in a double-blind, parallel design. Measurements of body composition by means of conventional anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance (BIA), CT scan and DEXA scan, exercise capacity, and isometric muscle strength were performed at baseline and after 12 months treatment. For body composition measurements a control group of 39 healthy, age and sex-matched subjects was included. RESULTS Sum of skinfolds (SKF) at 4 sites decreased significantly after GH treatment. Total body fat (TBF) as assessed by DEXA and BIA was elevated at baseline but normalized after GH. TBF assessed by SKF revealed significantly higher levels compared to DEXA and BIA, although all estimates intercorrelated closely. Visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat decreased by 25 and 17%, respectively after GH (P<0.01) to levels no longer different from the control group. CT of the mid thigh revealed a significant reduction in fat tissue and a significant increase in muscle volume after GH treatment, both of which resulted in a normalization of the muscle : fat ratio (%) (placebo: 58 : 42 (baseline) vs 58 : 42 (12 months); GH: 66 : 34 (baseline) vs 72 : 28 (12 months) (P=0.002); normal subjects: 67 : 33 (P<0.05 when compared to 12 months placebo data)). Total body resistance and resistance relative to muscle volume decreased significantly after GH treatment suggesting over-hydration as compared to normal subjects. Exercise capacity (kJ) increased significantly after GH treatment (placebo: 54.7±9.8 (baseline) vs 51.6±8.2 (12 months); GH: 64.9±13.3 (baseline) vs 73.5±13.6 (12 months) (P<0.05)). Isometric quadriceps strength increased after GH but no treatment effect could be detected owing to a small increase in the placebo group. Serum IGF-I levels (μg/l) were low baseline and increased markedly after GH treatment to a level exceeding that of normal subjects (270±31 (12 months GH) vs 156±8 (normal subjects (P<0.01)). The levels of serum electrolytes and HbA1c remained unchanged. The number of adverse effects were higher in the GH group after 3 months, but not after 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS (1) The reduction in excess visceral fat during GH substitution is pronounced and sustained; (2) beneficial effects on total body fat, muscle volume and physical fitness can be reproduced during prolonged placebo-controlled conditions; (3) uncontrolled data on muscle strength must be interpreted with caution; (4) a daily GH substitution dose of 2 IU/m² seems too high in many adult patients.     

Effect of recombinant hGH (rhGH) replacement on gonadal function in male patients with organic adult-onset GH deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Previous evidence indicated that, in adults with organic hypopituitarism, GH deficiency (GHD) may mask the presence of other pituitary deficits, in particular central hypothyroidism and hypoadrenalism. Little and conflicting information is available about the relationship between GHD, rhGH therapy and gonadal function in males. The aim of the present study was to investigate the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPG) in male adults with organic GHD and normal HPG axis. PATIENTS: Twelve male adults (mean age 48 +/- 7 years) with organic GHD and normal HPG axis. MEASUREMENTS: Serum levels of testosterone, LH and FSH (basal and after GnRH stimulation test), SHBG and IGF-I and percentage body fat (BF%) were evaluated before and during rhGH (mean dose 0.24 +/- 0.02 mg/day for 13 +/- 1 months) treatment. RESULTS: Serum IGF-I levels normalized during rhGH treatment and BF% significantly decreased. Serum testosterone levels significantly decreased (from 18.1 +/- 1.7 to 14.2 +/- 1.6 nmol/l, P = 0.01), with a parallel and significant decrease of serum SHBG (from 31.1 +/- 3.6 to 24.3 +/- 2.3 nmol/l, P < 0.05). Thus, calculated free testosterone (cFT) did not change (from 0.39 +/- 0.17 to 0.33 +/- 0.14 nmol/l, P = ns). Finally, no difference was found in basal and GnRH stimulated gonadotrophins levels. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the condition of GHD does not seem to mask central hypogonadism, in contrast to what is observed for central hypothyroidism and hypoadrenalism. However, the significant decrease in serum testosterone levels, strictly related to SHBG decrease, suggests that evaluation of the HPG axis during rhGH treatment cannot be based on the measurement of total testosterone levels, but should mainly rely on calculation of cFT and a careful clinical evaluation, in order to avoid unnecessary replacement therapy.     

One year of GH replacement therapy with a fixed low-dose regimen improves body composition, bone mineral density and lipid profile of GH-deficient adults

OBJECTIVE: We have studied the effects on body composition and metabolism of a fixed low dose of growth hormone (GH), 0.6 IU (0.2 mg)/day, administered for 12 months to GH-deficient (GHD) adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective open-label study, using 18 GHD patients (11 women, 7 men; aged 21-58 years). All investigations were performed at baseline and after 12 months. Body composition was determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Total body fat decreased (-1.74+/-2.87%) and lean body mass (LBM) increased (1.27+/-2.08 kg) after therapy (P < 0.05). Changes in truncal fat did not reach statistical significance, but a decrease varying from 0.72 to 2.78kg (1 to 8.7%) was observed in 13 (72%) patients. Bone mineral density (BMD) increased at lumbar spine, total femur and femoral neck (P < 0.05). Levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol were lower after therapy (P < 0.05), and their changes were directly associated with values at baseline. Insulin levels increased and the insulin resistance index worsened at 12 months (P < 0.05). Median IGF-I s.d. score was -4.30 (range, -11.03 to -0.11) at baseline and -1.73 (range, -9.80 to 2.26) at 12 months. Normal age-adjusted IGF-I levels were obtained with therapy in 5 of 11 patients who had low IGF-I levels at baseline. Changes in IGF-I levels were not correlated with any biological end point, except changes in LBM (r = 0.53, P = 0.02). Side effects were mild and disappeared spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: One-year of a fixed low-dose GH regimen in GHD adults resulted in a significant reduction in body fat, total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, and a significant increase in LBM and BMD at lumbar spine and femur, regardless of normalization of IGF-I levels. This regimen led to an elevation of insulin levels and a worsening of the insulin resistance index.     

Alterations in the oxidant-antioxidant status in prepubertal children with growth hormone deficiency: effect of growth hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults is associated with increased oxidative stress determined by the underlying GH-IGF-1 axis alterations. Despite GHD being a common diagnosis in children with short stature, no data on the oxidant/antioxidant status are available in this age group. This study was designed to detect differences in oxidative stress parameters between prepubertal GH-deficient children and healthy controls. Furthermore, the effect of 12 months of conventional GH replacement (rGH) on oxidant-antioxidant status was evaluated in the GHD group only. PATIENTS: Ten (nine males and one female) prepubertal children (mean age 9.1 +/- 1.3 years) with GHD were recruited and matched for sex and age (9.2 +/- 1.9 years) with 20 healthy controls (18 males and two females). MEASUREMENTS: At study entry, lag phase, an index of susceptibility of low density lipoprotein (LDL) to in vitro oxidation, malondialdehyde (MDA) and vitamin E were measured in all subjects. These parameters were also evaluated in GH-deficient children after 12 months of rGH treatment. RESULTS: The lag phase was significantly decreased in GH-deficient children compared to healthy controls (15.50 +/- 7.4 vs. 43.00 +/- 9.2 min; P = 0.0007), while MDA was significantly increased (1.33 +/- 0.38 vs. 0.46 +/- 0.10 nmol/mg; P = 0.0006). Vitamin E levels were significantly decreased (22.44 +/- 9.57 vs. 35.38 +/- 16.49 micromol/l; P = 0.001). IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 correlated directly to lag phase (r = 0.48; P = 0.01; r = 0.63, P = 0.002, respectively) and to vitamin E (r = 0.59, P = 0.003; r = 0.58, P = 0.006, respectively). By contrast, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 correlated indirectly to MDA (r = -0.47, P = 0.01; r =-0.65, P = 0.002, respectively). After 1 year of rGH therapy, lag phase (39.32 +/- 15.24 min; P = 0.005) and vitamin E (34.9 +/- 7.7 micromol/l; P = 0.005) increased significantly, while MDA decreased significantly (0.71 +/- 0.42 nmol/mg; P = 0.005), reaching normal levels. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that children with GHD have substantially increased oxidative stress parameters compared to healthy controls and demonstrate a normalization of these parameters after 1 year of rGH therapy.