Histopathological work-up and interpretation of sentinel lymph nodes removed for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

Aims:  To evaluate the work-up of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) removed for vulvar pT1–pT2 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Inguinal lymphadenectomy yields metastases in only 30% of cases. Patients with missed inguinal disease, however, have a risk of dying from systemic disease. SLN dissections reduce morbidity, but work-up should reliably identify metastatic disease.
Methods and results:  All SLNs removed from 38 patients with pT1–pT2 SCC and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes were submitted for frozen section analysis. When negative, SLN were formalin-fixed, sectioned entirely at 330-μm intervals to produce three slides per millimetre [two haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides; one slide for immunohistochemistry]. If screening of H&E-stained sections was negative, all remaining slides were subjected to immunohistochemistry with an antibody to cytokeratin. Twenty-five of 38 patients (66%) were pN0, 7/38 (18%) had metastases on frozen sections/H&E stains. Immunohistochemistry detected micrometastases in two patients and single tumour cells and anucleate cell structures in four patients. In 12/13 patients the SLN metastases, including all single-cell deposits, were from lichen sclerosus (LS)-associated SCC. Twelve of 13 patients with metastases had a pT2 SCC.
Conclusions:  Micrometastases and single tumour cell deposits in SLNs are typical of LS-associated vulvar SCC. Single tumour cell deposits in SNLs should be regarded as 'positive'. Identification requires serial sectioning and immunohistochemical analysis of all removed SLNs.     

Multiparameter flow cytometry as a tool for the detection of micrometastatic tumour cells in the sentinel lymph node procedure of patients with breast cancer

AIM: To investigate whether multiparameter flow cytometry (MP-FCM) can be used for the detection of micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer. METHODS: Formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded sentinel lymph nodes (n = 238) from 98 patients were analysed. For each lymph node, sections for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cytokeratin (MNF116) were cut at three levels with a distance of 500 microm. The intervening material was used for MP-FCM. Cells were immunostained with MNF116, followed by an incubation with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labelled goat antimouse immunoglobulin. DNA was stained using propidium iodide. From each lymph node 100,000 cells were analysed on the flow cytometer. RESULTS: Thirty eight of the 98 patients with breast carcinoma showed evidence of metastatic disease in the SLN by one ore more of the three methods. In 37 of 38 cases where metastatic cells were seen in the routine H&E and/or IHC, more than 1% cytokeratin positive cells were detected by MP-FCM. In 24 patients, metastatic foci were more than 2 mm (macrometastasis) and in 14 these foci were smaller than 2 mm (micrometastasis). In three of these 14 cases, MP-FCM revealed positive SLNs, although this was not seen at first glance in the H&E or IHC sections. After revision of the slides, one of these three remained negative. However, MP-FCM analysis of the cytokeratin positive cells showed an aneuploid DNA peak, which was almost identical to that of the primary breast tumour. Duplicate measurements, done in 41 cases, showed a 99% reproducibility. In five of 14 patients with micrometastasis, one or two metastatic foci were found in the non-SLN. However, in 15 of 24 macrometastases multiple non-SLNs were found to have metastatic tumour. All micrometastases except for the remaining negative one mentioned above showed only diploid tumour cells, despite the fact that their primary tumours contained both diploid and aneuploid tumour cells. In primary tumours with more than 60% aneuploid cells, predominantly aneuploid macrometastasis were found, whereas diploid primary tumours only showed diploid micrometastases or macrometastases in their SLN. Aneuploid SLN macrometastases were associated with non-SLN metastases in five of seven patients, whereas diploid cases showed additional non-SLN metastases in only seven of 16 patients. CONCLUSION: In all cases, MP-FCM was sufficient to detect micrometastatic tumour cells in a large volume of lymph node tissue from SLNs. In some cases it was superior to H&E and IHC staining. Approximately 30% of SLN micrometastases are accompanied by additional non-SLN metastases. The size of the aneuploid fraction (> 60%) in the primary tumour may influence the risk of having both SLN and non-SLN metastases.     

Mapping metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer

Localization of metastases within the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of breast cancer has not been studied. Forty SLNs from 36 patients with operable primary breast cancers were identified by means of lymphatic mapping with patent blue dye. The junction between the patent blue-stained lymphatic vessel draining the tumor and the SLN was labeled with alcian blue. Metastases within the serially sectioned SLNs were assigned to the alcian blue-labeled side, to the opposite side of the virtually halved nodes, or both. Eight SLNs were negative for metastasis. Eleven SLNs had metastases only in the blue half. Only 4 cases had larger metastases in the nonblue half. Metastases are more likely to be located in the vicinity of the inflow junction of the identifiable lymphatic draining the tumor and the SLN. This should be considered when SLNs are examined, especially when they are halved for different studies.     

Sentinel lymph node investigation in melanoma: detailed analysis of the yield from step sectioning and immunohistochemistry

AIMS: To evaluate in detail the extent to which step sectioning and immunohistochemical examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with melanoma reveal additional node positive patients, to arrive at a sensitive yet workable protocol for histopathological SLN examination. METHODS: The study comprised 29 patients with one or more positive SLN after a successful SLN procedure for clinical stage I/II melanoma. SLNs were lamellated into pieces of approximately 0.5 cm in size. One initial haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained central cross section was made for each block. When negative, four step ribbons were cut at intervals of 250 microm. One section from each ribbon was stained with H&E, and one was used for immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: When taking the cumulative total of detected metastases at level 5 as 100%, the percentage of SLN positive patients increased from 79%, 83%, 83%, 90% to 93% in the H&E sections through levels 1-5, and with IHC these values were 83%, 86%, 90%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. One of six patients in whom metastases were detected at levels 2-5 only had metastases in the subsequent additional lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple level sectioning of SLNs (five levels at 250 microm intervals) and the use of IHC detects additional metastases up to the last level in melanoma SLNs. Although more levels of sectioning might increase the yield even further, this protocol ensures a reasonable workload for the pathologist with an acceptable sensitivity when compared with the published literature.     

Nodal melanocytic nevi in sentinel lymph nodes. Correlation with melanoma-associated cutaneous nevi

Melanocytic nevi occurring in lymph nodes create diagnostic difficulty by mimicking metastases. Few studies describe nodal nevi in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) excised for melanoma. We evaluated 72 cases in which patients had undergone SLN biopsy for melanoma. Lymph nodes and cutaneous melanomas were evaluated according to a standard protocol. Nodal nevi were identified in 8 patients (11%). Of these, 6 (75%) had an associated cutaneous nevus (P = .006). Of 21 patients with an associated nevus, 4 (19%) with nodal nevi had a cutaneous nevus with congenital features (P = .01). The incidence of nodal nevus correlated with a Breslow thickness greater than 2.5 mm (P = .02). Nevi were not seen in non-SLNs. Nodal nevi appear more frequently in patients with melanoma-associated cutaneous nevi, particularly if congenital features are present. The increased frequency of nodal nevi in SLNs relative to non-SLNs suggests an etiology of mechanical transport of nevus cells.     

Update on sentinel node pathology in breast cancer

Pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer has been impacted by the publication of practicing changing trials over the last decade. With evidence from the ACOSOG Z0011 trial to suggest that there is no significant benefit to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early-stage breast cancer patients with up to 2 positive SLNs, the rate of ALND, and in turn, intraoperative evaluation of SLNs has significantly decreased. It is of limited clinical significance to pursue multiple levels and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry to detect occult small metastases, such as isolated tumor cells and micrometastases, in this setting. Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy, who represent a population with more extensive disease and aggressive tumor biology, were not included in Z0011 and similar trials, and thus, the evidence cannot be extrapolated to them. Recent trials have supported the safety and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in these patients when clinically node negative at the time of surgery. ALND remains the standard of care for any amount of residual disease in the SLNs and intraoperative evaluation of SLNs is still of value for real time surgical decision making. Given the potential prognostic significance of residual small metastases in treated lymph nodes, as well as the decreased false negative rate with the use of cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC), it may be reasonable to maintain a low threshold for the use of cytokeratin IHC in post-neoadjuvant cases. Further recommendations for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy await outcomes data from ongoing clinical trials. This review will provide an evidence-based discussion of best practices in SLN evaluation.     

Implementation of step sectioning in the examination of sentinel lymph nodes to improve the detection of micrometastases in breast cancer patients

The object of this study was to examine whether a new protocol for examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) would lead to the detection of more metastases. Sections of 1 mm would identify most SLN macrometastases, and step sections at intervals of 200-250 μm would identify most micrometastases. A total of 111 breast cancer patients who underwent the SLN procedure at St. Olavs University Hospital in Trondheim, Norway in 2008 were included in the study group. Their SLNs were processed according to a new standardized protocol with sections of 2-3 mm being step sectioned at intervals of 200-250 μm. A total of 109 breast cancer patients undergoing the SLN procedure in 2007 were used as a reference group. Metastases were found in 29% of the cases, compared with 26% in the reference group. Step sectioning of SLNs revealed metastases in five cases initially found to be negative. The metastases of the study group were smaller, with a median value of 1.25 mm compared with 4.25 mm in the reference group. Step sectioning led to the detection of metastases in SLNs initially found to be negative. The median size of the metastases was considerably smaller in the study group than in the reference group.     

Anatomopathological analysis of sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: hematoxylin-eosin versus immunohistochemistry

The authors compare the detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining versus immunohistochemistry (IHC). Thirty-six patients with breast carcinoma undergo exeresis of the primary tumor and of 50 SLNs and 491 NSLNs. Sentinel lymph nodes are sectioned into transverse slices of 2- to 3-mm thickness, and a cytologic smear and a frozen section were obtained from each slice. The slices are completely cut into serial sections at 100-microm intervals. Two consecutive 4-microm-thick sections are then obtained from each level and were prepared for HE staining and IHC. Nonsentinel lymph nodes are evaluated similarly to SLNs. The authors obtain 4076 SLN sections and 32 012 NSLN sections, for a total of 36 088 sections. A comparison of HE staining versus IHC based on the total number of sections shows a sensitivity of 93.8%, a negative predictive value of 98.9%, and an accuracy of 99.1%. The values obtained by HE staining are similar to those obtained by IHC.     

Supervised automated microscopy increases sensitivity and efficiency of detection of sentinel node micrometastases in patients with breast cancer

AIMS: To investigate the practicality and sensitivity of supervised automated microscopy (AM) for the detection of micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from patients with breast carcinoma. METHODS: In total, 440 SLN slides (immunohistochemically stained for cytokeratin) from 86 patients were obtained from two hospitals. Samples were selected on the basis of: (1) a pathology report mentioning micrometastases or isolated tumour cells (ITCs) and (2) reported as negative nodes (N0). RESULTS: From a test set of 29 slides (12 SLN positive patients, including positive and negative nodes), 18 slides were scored positive by supervised AM and 11 were negative. Routine examination revealed 17 positive slides and 12 negative. Subsequently, automated reanalysis of 187 slides (34 patients; institute I) and 216 slides (40 patients; institute II) from reported node negative (N0) patients showed that two and seven slides (from two and five patients, respectively) contained ITCs, respectively, all confirmed by the pathologists, corresponding to 5.9% and 12.5% missed patients. In four of the seven missed cases from institute II, AM also detected clusters of four to 30 cells, but all with a size < or = 0.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised AM is a more sensitive method for detecting immunohistochemically stained micrometastasis and ITCs in SLNs than routine pathology. However, the clinical relevance of detecting cytokeratin positive cells in SLNs of patients with breast cancer is still an unresolved issue and is at the moment being validated in larger clinical trials.     

Intraoperative cytologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma by scrape preparation

Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast carcinoma allows surgeons to complete axillary lymph node dissection in one procedure if any SLN shows metastasis. The accuracy of intraoperative pathological diagnosis is critical for decision-making. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our rapid intraoperative cytologic diagnosis of SLN through comparing with the final surgical pathologic diagnosis of the corresponding lymph nodes. A total of 454 SLNs from 159 consecutive female patients with a preoperative diagnosis of breast carcinoma over 3-year period were included in this study. After gross examination of each bisected lymph node, a scrape preparation was prepared for each submitted lymph node and was stained by the rapid Papanicolaou method. The intraoperative cytologic diagnosis was compared with the final surgical pathologic diagnoses. The overall sensitivity of intraoperative cytology was 52.5% with specificity of 100%. There were 17 false-negative cases. Of them, six nodes had isolated tumor cells, seven nodes had micrometastasis (0.2-2 mm), and four nodes had macrometastasis (>2 mm). There were no interpretive errors identified. The size of metastasis and tumor grade appeared to be significant factors in detecting metastasis by cytology. In addition, subsequent non-SLN involvement was 9% in patients with micrometastasis versus 50% in patients with macrometastasis (P < 0.05). Our study shows that the intraoperative cytologic evaluation of SLNs in breast carcinoma is a reasonably accurate method. The majority of false-negative cases were due to micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells.     

p16 expression in sentinel nodes with metastatic breast carcinoma: evaluation of its role in developing triaging strategies for axillary node dissection and a marker of poor prognosis

Not all patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) in a sentinel lymph node (SLN) have metastasis in additional axillary nodes (ANs). A biological marker that can predict this occurrence may be beneficial in triaging only appropriate patients for AN dissection (AND). Our aim was to study p16 expression in SLNs and to determine whether it is a predictor of metastases to additional ANs and a marker of poor prognosis. We correlated p16 expression in SLNs and ANs of 54 patients with MBC with clinicopathologic features and the nodal proliferative index (PI). We sequenced p16 from DNA in 7 cases. We found that 35 of 54 cases (65%) had p16-positive tumor cells. Nine of 17 (53%) cases in which both SLN and AND were done had MBC in additional ANs. The SLNs of 8 of 9 cases (89%) were p16 positive (73% positive predictive value). Eight of 17 (47%) cases had no metastases in ANs even though their SLNs had metastases. The SLNs of 5 of 8 (62.5%) of these cases were p16 negative (83% negative predictive value). Ductal MBCs were p16 positive in 27 of 37 cases (73%). Carcinomas with a lobular component were p16 negative in 9 of 11 cases (82%). Nine of 12 (75%) p16-negative ductal carcinomas were estrogen receptor (ER) positive. Some 75% of T2 and T3 tumors were p16 positive, compared with 50% of T1 tumors. The highest PI (defined as > or =50%) was seen in p16-positive SLNs (5 of 6 cases). The p16 DNA sequence was normal, and no mutations were found. Our findings indicate that p16 expression in SLNs with MBC predicts (1) increased likelihood of metastasis in additional ANS, and its expression along with other markers and clinicopathologic parameters may serve as an indicator for proceeding to a formal AND; (2) poor prognosis and is associated with larger primary tumors with a high nodal PI and ER-negative status; and (3) histological subtypes. Gene mutations were not responsible for the expression of p16 in our cases.     

Intraoperative examination of the sentinel lymph node for breast carcinoma staging.

Intraoperative pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) draining a primary breast carcinoma allows an SLN-positive patient to undergo complete axillary lymphadenectomy as part of the same surgical procedure. However, the optimal technique for rapid SLN assessment has not been determined. We reviewed our results with imprint cytology (IC) and frozen section (FS) examination of SLNs from 278 patients. Compared with H&E-stained paraffin sections, IC and FS had an overall accuracy of 93.2%. The false-reassurance rate (false-negative results/all negative results) was 8.4%. It correctly identified 98% of macrometastases but only 28% of micrometastases. There were no false-positive results. Compared with paraffin-section cytokeratin immunohistochemistry results, the IC-FS false-reassurance rate increased to 25.8%. The false-reassurance rate decreased with smaller primary tumor size (T1 vs T2/3) and ductal type, smaller diameter of the SLN (< or = 2.0 cm), and greater pathologist experience. IC combined with 2-level FS reliably identifies SLN macrometastases but commonly fails to detect SLN micrometastases. If SLN micrometastasis is used to determine the need for further lymphadenectomy, more sensitive intraoperative methods will be needed to avoid a second operation.     

Frequency of apoptotic cells and BAX positive cells in the lymph nodes of colorectal cancer patients with metastasis and micrometastasis

It is regarded that the presence of micrometastatic(isolated) cancer cells is a forerunner of metastasis. We classified advanced colorectal cancers into 3 groups such as metastasis group in which distinct metastasis was identified in lymph nodes by HE stain, micrometastasis group which was negative for metastasis by HE stain but positive for micrometastasis by immunostain using antibody for cytokeratin, and non-metastasis group which was negative for both stains. We investigated proliferative activity of cells and frequency of apoptotic cells in the lymph nodes from each group. The frequency of apoptotic cells in the metastasis group was significantly lower than the other groups (p < 0.02), and correlated with expression of BAX protein. In conclusion, frequencies of apoptotic cells and BAX positive cells in the nodes of metastasis group were significantly lower than micrometastasis group. And it was suggested that those changes were correlated with inflow of isolated cancer cells and formation of metastatic foci in the lymph nodes, and may reflected the difference of immunological activity against cancer cells.     

Rapid intraoperative immunohistochemical evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for metastatic breast carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an integral part of the surgical management of patients with breast cancer. Rapid immunohistochemistry (RIHC) has the potential to increase detection of metastatic carcinoma at the time of frozen section consultation. The authors assessed the accuracy and turnaround time of a newly developed RIHC method for pancytokeratin (RIHC-CK). METHODS: Sixty-six SLNs from 32 patients with breast carcinoma were examined for metastasis using the Zymed Sentinel Lymph Node Rapid IHC Kit. Intraoperative frozen sections (6 mum) of the SLNs were incubated with Zymed anti-pan-cytokeratin/HRP conjugate, diaminobenzidine (DAB), and stained with hematoxylin. Slides were ready within 8 minutes and were interpreted as positive or negative for metastatic carcinoma. Results were compared with previous intraoperative touch preparations, frozen sections, hematoxylin and eosin (Perm H&E), and AEl/3-immunostained permanent sections (Perm CK). RESULTS: Fourteen lymph nodes (19%) in 13 patients tested positive for metastatic carcinoma in Perm H&E, the gold standard. RIHC-CK had the highest sensitivity (92%) of the intraoperative tests, compared with touch preparations (64%) and frozen sections (80%). RIHC-CK showed 94% accuracy, compared with 96% (frozen section) and 93% (touch preparation). The RIHC technique took 8 minutes and was easy to perform and interpret. CONCLUSIONS: Zymed RIHC is a sensitive method for detecting breast cancer metastases in SLNs. The speed, accuracy, and ease of interpretation of the test allow for recognition of micrometastases (<2 mm) that might otherwise be undetectable by current methods of intraoperative evaluation. The prognostic significance and effect on surgical management of micrometastases in SLNs have yet to be determined.     

Factors affecting metastases to non-sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

AIMS: Because sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer has become well established, one of the challenges now is to determine which patients require a completion axillary dissection following a positive SLN biopsy. METHODS: A prospective database of patients who underwent SLN biopsy for invasive breast cancer from July 1999 to November 2002 (n = 180) was analysed. Fifty four patients (30%) had one or more positive SLN, and all underwent a completion axillary dissection. This subgroup was further analysed to delineate which factors predicted non-SLN metastasis. RESULTS: Twenty six of the 54 patients with a positive SLN had additional metastases in non-SLNs. Significant variables that predicted non-SLN metastasis included extranodal extension (odds ratio (OR), 17.399; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.69 to 178.96) and macrometastasis within the SLN (OR, 6.985; 95% CI, 1.291 to 37.785). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with invasive breast cancer and a positive SLN, extranodal extension or macrometastasis within the SLN were both independent predictors of non-SLN involvement.     

Minimal metastatic disease in sentinel lymph nodes in breast carcinoma: some modest proposals to refine criteria for "isolated tumor cells"

Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast carcinoma. The weight of cumulative evidence suggests that the development of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy procedure has not only allowed for accurate lymph node-staging but has also helped avoid the morbidity of a full axillary dissection in those patients who are unlikely to have metastatic tumor in that location. The detection of metastases in SLNs is facilitated by the, now relatively routine, enhanced histopathologic examination via step-sectioning and immunohistochemistry. In clinical terms, the finding of a metastatic deposit that measures between 0.2 and 2 mm, that is, "micrometastasis" in a SLN is largely noncontroversial; however, the presence of smaller metastatic foci detected either by routine hematoxylin and eosin stain or by cytokeratin immunostain [<0.2 mm, ie, so-called "isolated tumor cells (ITCs)"] has remained problematic since the advent of the SLN biopsy. In this communication, attention is drawn to the broad morphologic range of metastatic disease in SLN that may be placed in the category of so-called ITC. To facilitate the reproducible classification of the various strata of minimal metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes, we recommend the following: (1) the term "isolated tumor cell" (note singular form) be restricted to cases that show the presence of only a single tumor cell. (2) In situations where there are multiple isolated single cells and/or cell cluster(s) present and each cluster measures<0.2 mm, the term "submicroscopic metastasis" be adopted and an actual count of tumor cells present may be given. (3) Restrict the use of the term micrometastasis to cases wherein the largest metastatic focus is larger than 0.2 mm but smaller than 2.0 mm.     

Evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy by immunohistochemistry and multilevel sectioning in patients with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection for evaluation of the presence or absence of metastatic disease is the single most important prognostic factor for patients with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer. Recently, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is being investigated as an alternative to the evaluation of the entire axilla. We evaluated whether the application of multilevel sectioning and immunohistochemistry in SLNs will increase the accuracy of detection of metastatic deposits. METHODS: Between October 1998 and July 1999, 38 patients with breast carcinoma (25 ductal, 5 lobular, 4 tubular, and 4 mixed ductal and lobular) underwent successful SLN biopsy followed by complete axillary node dissection. Sentinel lymph nodes were localized with a combination of isosulfan blue dye and radionuclide colloid injection. Frozen sections and permanent sections of SLNs were examined. All negative SLNs were examined for micrometastases by 3 additional hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained sections and immunohistochemistry with the cytokeratins AE1/AE3. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified surgically in 38 (93%) of 41 patients. There was a 97% correlation between the results of the frozen sections and the permanent H&E-stained sections. Twelve (32%) of 38 patients showed evidence of metastatic disease in their SLN by routine H&E staining. In 7 (58%) of 12 patients with positive nodes, the sentinel node was the only positive node. The 26 patients with negative SLN examination by H&E were further analyzed for micrometastases; 5 (19%) were found to have metastatic deposits by immunohistochemistry. Of these patients, 2 were also converted to node positive by detection of micrometastatic disease by examination of the additional H&E levels. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph nodes can be accurately identified in the axilla of breast cancer patients. Evaluation of SLNs provides reliable information representative of the status of the axilla in these patients. Immunohistochemistry and, to a lesser degree, detailed multilevel sectioning are able to further improve our ability to detect micrometastatic disease in SLNs of breast cancer patients.     

Histopathological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes

AIMS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an important component in the staging and treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM). The medical literature provides only limited information regarding melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) histology. This report details the specific histological patterns of melanoma metastases in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and highlights some key factors in evaluating SLNs for melanoma. METHODS: From 281 SLNB cases between June 1998 and May 2002, 79 consecutive cases of SLN biopsies positive for metastases from CM were retrospectively reviewed. The important characteristics of the SLNs and the metastatic foci are described. RESULTS: The median size of positive SLNs was 17 mm (range, 5-38). SLNs had a median of two metastatic foci (range, 1-11), with the largest foci being a median of 1.1 mm in size (range, 0.05-24). S-100 and HMB-45 staining was positive in 100% and 92% of the detected metastatic foci, respectively. The metastatic melanoma cells were epithelioid, spindled, and mixed in 86%, 5%, and 9% of cases. Metastatic foci were most often (86%) found in the subcapsular region of the SLN. Benign naevic cells were found coexisting in 14% of positive SLNs. CONCLUSIONS: Staining for S100 is more sensitive than HMB-45 (100% v 92%), but HMB-45 staining helped to distinguish benign naevic cells from melanoma. The subcapsular region was crucial in SLN evaluation, because it contained the metastases in 86% of cases. Evaluation of the subcapsular space should not be compromised by cautery artefacts or incomplete excision of the SLN.     

Can Melan-A replace S-100 and HMB-45 in the evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes from patients with malignant melanoma?

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become an increasingly important procedure used in the primary staging of malignant melanoma. However, micrometastases in a lymph node can be easily missed on routine H&E-stained sections. Therefore, S-100 and HMB-45 IHC stains are standardly performed on grossly negative SLNs for detection of metastatic melanoma. Each of these IHC markers, however, is not ideal. The authors investigated whether the newer IHC marker Melan-A would improve the detection of metastatic melanoma in SLN biopsies. Forty lymph nodes previously diagnosed with metastatic melanoma were retrospectively evaluated for S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A expression. In addition, 42 SLN biopsies for metastatic melanoma detection were prospectively collected and evaluated for S-100, HMB-45, and Melan-A expression. All lymph nodes with metastatic melanoma from the retrospective study demonstrated S-100 reactivity. Five of the lymph nodes with metastatic melanoma from the retrospective study failed to express either HMB-45 or Melan-A, all of which displayed a desmoplastic morphology. One of the metastases positive for S-100 and HMB-45 failed to show reactivity with Melan-A (3%). The prospective study found 10 lymph nodes from 42 cases to be positive for metastatic melanoma, which were positive for S-100 (100%). Nine of the involved lymph nodes were positive for HMB-45(90%), and nine were positive for Melan-A (90%). Melan-A, although very specific, cannot replace the use of S-100 and HMB-45 for the detection of metastatic melanoma in SLNs. It can, however, substitute for HMB-45 with equally good results.