Divergent Interpretations of Imaging After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer

PurposeConflicting information from health care providers contributes to anxiety among cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate discordant interpretations of follow-up imaging studies after lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) between radiologists and radiation oncologists.Methods and MaterialsPatients treated with SBRT for stage I non-small cell lung cancer from 2007 to 2018 at Duke University Medical Center were included. Radiology interpretations of follow-up computed tomography (CT) chest or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scans and the corresponding radiation oncology interpretations in follow-up notes from the medical record were assessed. Based on language used, interpretations were scored as concerning for progression (Progression), neutral differential listed (Neutral Differential), or favor stability/postradiation changes (Stable). Neutral Differential required that malignancy was specifically listed as a possibility in the differential. Encounters were categorized as discordant when either radiology or radiation oncology interpreted the surveillance imaging as Progression when the other interpreted the imaging study as Stable or Neutral Differential. The incidence of discordant interpretations was the primary endpoint of the study.ResultsFrom 2007 to 2018, 139 patients were treated with SBRT and had available follow-up CT or PET-CT imaging for the analysis. Median follow-up was 61 months and the median number of follow-up encounters per patient was 3. Of 534 encounters evaluated, 25 (4.7%) had overtly discordant interpretations of imaging studies. This most commonly arose when radiology felt the imaging study showed Progression but radiation oncology favored Stable or Neutral Differential (24/25, 96%). No patient or treatment variables were found to be significantly associated with discordant interpretations on univariate analysis including type of scan (CT 22/489, 4.5%; PET-CT 3/45, 7%; P = .46).ConclusionsSurveillance imaging after lung SBRT is often interpreted differently by radiologists and radiation oncologists, but overt discordance was relatively low at our institution. Providers should be aware of differences in interpretation patterns that may contribute to increased patient distress.     

A Prospective Trial Evaluating the Safety and Systemic Response From the Concurrent Use of Radiation Therapy with Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction/BackgroundThis study assessed the safety and systemic (abscopal) response from the addition of local stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer.Patients/MethodsThirty-five patients with at least 2 sites of measurable disease on PET/CT received standard-of-care CPI immunotherapy alone (n = 19), or in combination with 4 cycles doublet carboplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy (n = 16), and 3 to 5 fractions SBRT to a single extracranial target lesion between cycles 1 to 2 of the systemic therapy. Adverse events were assessed using CTCAE version 5.0. Best systemic objective response rate (ORR) was assessed using iRECIST criteria, excluding any irradiated lesion(s). Additional SBRT to a different target lesion was offered to patients who continued on immunotherapy with unconfirmed progressive disease or mixed response.ResultsFifteen patients (44%) experienced 22 grade 1 to 2 toxicities potentially attributable to radiation, most commonly pneumonitis (n = 9) and fatigue (n = 6), and no grade 3 to 5 radiation-induced toxicities. Patients undergoing combined CPI-chemotherapy received a lower median biologically effective dose of SBRT than those undergoing CPI monotherapy (43.2 vs. 60Gy), but had a higher rate of radiation-induced toxicity (56% vs. 32%, P < .01). The best systemic ORR was 53%, with 20.5% stable disease and 26.5% progressive disease. Fifteen patients underwent a subsequent course of SBRT based on their response, among which 3 (20%) had progression-free intervals of 12, 16, and 10 months thereafter.ConclusionsAddition of SBRT to CPI immunotherapy (with/without chemotherapy) is safe. The favorable systemic response observed warrants further assessment with a randomized trial.     

Impact of Tumor Size on Local Control and Pneumonitis After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Tumors

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly used to treat primary or oligometastatic malignancies in the lung, but most of the available data that describe the safety and efficacy of SBRT are for smaller tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumor size, among other factors, on local control (LC) and radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients who received lung SBRT.

Impact of Pretreatment Interstitial Lung Disease on Radiation Pneumonitis and Survival in Patients Treated With Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of interstitial lung disease (ILD) on radiation pneumonitis (RP) and overall survival (OS) in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Oligometastatic and Oligoprogressive Bladder Cancer and Other Urothelial Malignancies

AimsBladder cancer represents the most common type of urothelial carcinoma, with a median overall survival of 12.5–15 months in the case of metastatic disease. We evaluated the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the management oligometastatic urothelial cancer.Materials and methodsData on patients with a maximum of five metastases were collected from three institutions. Concomitant systemic therapy was allowed. End points were the local control of treated metastases, distant progression-free survival (PFS), overall PFS and overall survival.ResultsData for 82 lesions and 61 patients were included. The primary tumour was located in the bladder in 82% of patients, followed by kidney pelvis (11.5%). The most common treated site was lung (40.2%). Twenty-nine (47.5%) and 14 (23%) patients received systemic therapy before and during SBRT, respectively. The median BED10 value was 78.7 Gy. The median follow-up was 17.2 months. Rates of local control at 1 and 2 years were 92% and 88.9%, respectively, with correlation with systemic therapy before SBRT (hazard ratio 2.62, P = 0.034). Overall PFS at 1 and 2 years was 47.9% and 38.1%, respectively. The number of metastases was a predictive factor (hazard ratio 2.65, P = 0.008). The median overall survival was 25.6 months. Total dose (hazard ratio 0.93, P = 0.003) and BED10 (hazard ratio 0.97, P = 0.006) were correlated with overall survival. No grade ≥2 adverse events were reported.ConclusionsSBRT represents an effective and safe treatment in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Prospective randomised trials are necessary to better evaluate the benefit on delaying the onset of new systemic therapies.     

Lung Metastases Treated with Image-guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

AimsTo evaluate outcomes after treatment with image-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using daily online cone beam computed tomography for malignancies metastatic to the lung.Materials and methodsForty-seven lung metastases in 32 patients were treated with volumetrically guided SBRT. The median age was 62 years (21–87). Primaries included colorectal (n = 10), sarcoma (n = 4), head and neck (n = 4), melanoma (n = 3), bladder (n = 2), non-small cell lung cancer (n = 2), renal cell (n = 2), thymoma (n = 2), thyroid (n = 1), endometrial (n = 1) and oesophageal (n = 1). The number of lung metastases per patient ranged from one to three (68% single lesions). SBRT was prescribed to the edge of the target volume to a median dose of 60 Gy (48–65 Gy) in a median of four fractions (four to 10). Most lesions were treated using 12 Gy fractions (92%) to 48 or 60 Gy.ResultsThe median follow-up was 27.6 months (7.6–57.1 months). The 1, 2 and 3 year actuarial local control rates for all treated lesions were 97, 92 and 85%, respectively. Two patients with colorectal primaries (four lesions in total) had local failure. The median overall survival was 40 months. The 1, 2 and 3 year overall survival from the time of SBRT completion was 83, 76 and 63%, respectively. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicities (one instance of each) included pneumonitis, dyspnoea, cough, rib fracture and pain.ConclusionSBRT with daily online cone beam computed tomography for lung metastases achieved excellent local tumour control with low toxicity and encouraging 2 and 3 year survival.     

Bronchial Stenosis in Central Pulmonary Tumors Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PurposeStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in lung tumors has an excellent local control due to the high delivered dose. Proximity of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT) to the high dose area may result in pulmonary toxicity. Bronchial stenosis is an adverse event that can occur after high dose to the PBT. Literature on the risk of developing bronchial stenosis is limited. We therefore evaluated the risk of bronchial stenosis for tumors central to the PBT and correlated the dose to the bronchi.Methods and MaterialsPatients with a planning tumor volume (PTV) ≤2 cm from PBT receiving SBRT (8 × 7.5 Gy) between 2015 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Main bronchi and lobar bronchi were manually delineated. Follow-up computed tomography scans were analyzed for bronchial stenosis and atelectasis. Bronchial stenosis was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAEv4). Patient, tumor, dosimetric factors and survival were evaluated between patients with and without stenosis using uni- and multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsFifty-one patients were analyzed with a median age of 70 years and World Health Organization (WHO) performance status ≤1 in 92.2%. Median follow-up was 36 months (interquartile range [IQR], 19.6-45.4) and median overall survival 48 months (IQR 21.5-59.3). In 15 patients (29.4%) bronchial stenosis was observed on follow-up computed tomography scan. Grade 1 stenosis was seen in 21.6% (n = 11), grade 2 in 7.8% (n = 4). No grade ≥3 stenosis was observed. Median time to stenosis was 9.6 months (IQR 4.4-19.2). Patients who developed stenosis had significantly larger gross tumor volume with a median of 19 cm³(IQR 7.7-63.2) versus 5.2 cm³ (IQR 1.7-11.3, P <.01). Prognostic factors in multivariate analysis for stenosis were age (P = .03; odds ratio [OR] 1.1), baseline dyspnea (P = .02 OR 7.7), and the mean lobar bronchus dose (P = .01; OR 1.1).ConclusionsLow-grade (≤2) lobar bronchial stenosis is a complication in approximately one-third of patients after SBRT for lung tumors with a PTV ≤2 cm from PBT. Prognostic risk factors were age, baseline dyspnea and mean dose on a lobar bronchus.     

Optimizing Palliative Focal Radiation Therapy Dose in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: How Low Can You Go?

PurposePrimary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are radiosensitive tumors with variable and often relapsing courses. Local disease can be treated with low-dose focal palliative radiation therapy (RT), though little data supports the use of a specific dose. This study assesses clinical outcomes after focal RT to a total dose of 4 Gy, 8 Gy, or 12 Gy.Methods and MaterialsAn International Review Board-approved, retrospective, single-institution study was performed of 225 lesions in 41 patients with primary CTCL treated with low-dose focal RT from 2015 to 2020. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were reviewed. The primary outcome was freedom from treatment failure (FFTF), defined as time to requiring local retreatment, and secondary outcomes included response rates and toxicities.ResultsOf the 225 lesions, 90 received 4 Gy, 106 received 8 Gy, and 29 received 12 Gy. Lesions treated with 12 Gy (96%) or 8 Gy (92%) had a significantly higher 1-year FFTF compared with 4 Gy (77%) (P = .034). Overall response rate and complete response rate were not significantly different between different doses (P = .117), though there was a trend toward higher overall response rate at initial assessment with 8 Gy versus 4 Gy (91.5% vs 82.2%, P = .057). Toxicity was low, with 7.1% of lesions having grade 2 or higher radiation dermatitis.ConclusionsIn primary CTCL lesions treated with focal palliative RT, a dose response was noted favoring 8 to 12 Gy, with 1-year FFTF rates over 90%. However, 4 Gy resulted in substantially better outcomes than previously reported, with 77% requiring no further treatment at 1 year and comparable response rates to higher doses. While our data substantiates 8 to 12 Gy as the standard of care, it also suggests that 4 Gy should be considered an acceptable alternative in situations with concern for radiation toxicities, such as with fragile or heavily pretreated skin.     

Location Matters: Stage I Non–Small-cell Carcinomas of the Lower Lobes Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Are Associated With Poor Outcomes

IntroductionThe lung is a heterogeneous organ with relative overperfusion of the lung bases. We determined whether a lower lobe primary tumor location was associated with poor outcomes in the setting of stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).Patients and MethodsThe data from consecutive patients with stage I NSCLC treated from 2009 to 2014 with curative intent SBRT were analyzed. Primary tumors in the right and left lower lobes were compared against the tumors in all other locations to determine whether a lower lobe location was associated with worse local, regional, and distant control and worse relapse-free and overall survival. The survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate analysis was completed using the Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, stage, performance status, and radiation dose.ResultsA total of 122 patients with early-stage NSCLC who underwent SBRT were evaluated at a median follow-up period of 28.6 months. On multivariate analysis, lower lobe tumors were associated with poor relapse-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-7.76; P = .04) and poor overall survival (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.09-5.64; P = .04). The 3-year relapse-free survival for patients with a lower lobe primary was 75% compared with 89% for patients with a non–lower lobe primary (P = .04). Additionally, the 3-year overall survival rate for patients with a lower lobe primary was 63% versus 82% in patients with a non–lower lobe primary (P = .01).ConclusionLower lobe stage I NSCLC tumors treated with SBRT are associated with poor relapse-free and overall survival.     

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost and Simultaneous Integrated Protection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

AimsTo evaluate the safety and feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and simultaneous integrated protection (SIP) in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Materials and methodsPatients receiving SBRT following induction chemotherapy from January 2017 to December 2018 were included in this observational analysis. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions by administering 30 Gy to the planning target volume while simultaneously delivering a 50 Gy SIB to the tumour–vessel interface. SIP was created by lowering the dose to 25 Gy on the overlap area between the planning target volume and the planning organ at risk volume. The primary end point was acute and late gastrointestinal grade ≥3 toxicity. Secondary end points were freedom from local progression, overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsFifty-nine consecutive patients (27 borderline resectable and 32 locally advanced) were included. Fifty-eight patients (98.3%) completed the SBRT planned treatment and 35 patients (59.4%) received surgical resection following SBRT. No acute or late grade ≥3 SBRT-related adverse events were observed. The median follow-up time was 15.1 months in the overall cohort and 18.1 months in censored patients. One- and 2-year freedom from local progression rates were 85% and 80% versus 79.7% and 60.6% in resected and unresected patients, respectively (P = 0.33). The median overall survival and PFS were 30.2 months and 19 months from diagnosis and 19.1 months and 10.7 months from SBRT in the entire cohort. Resected patients had improved 2-year overall survival rates (72.5% versus 49%, P = 0.012) and median PFS (13 months versus 5 months; P < 0.001) relative to unresected patients. There was no survival difference between borderline resectable and locally advanced patients.ConclusionsSBRT with SIB/SIP had an excellent toxicity profile and could be administered safely on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients, even in a total neoadjuvant setting.     

Outcomes Following SBRT vs. IMRT and 3DCRT for Older Patients with Stage IIA Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer > 5 cm

BackgroundTo describe outcomes and compare the effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with stage IIA lymph node-negative (N0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors > 5 cm.MethodsWe used the SEER-Medicare database (2005-2015) to identify patients > 65 years with stage IIA (AJCC TNM7) N0 NSCLC > 5 cm tumors who were treated with SBRT, IMRT, and 3DCRT. We used propensity score methods with inverse probability weighting to compare lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.ResultsOf 584 patients, 88 (15%), 140 (24%), and 356 (61%) underwent SBRT, IMRT, and 3DCRT, respectively. The SBRT group was older (P = .004), had more comorbidities (P = .02), smaller tumors (P = .03), and more adenocarcinomas (P < .0001). We found a trend towards higher median unadjusted OS with SBRT compared to IMRT and 3DCRT (19 vs. 13 and 14 months, respectively, P = .37). In our propensity score-adjusted analyses, SBRT was significantly associated with better OS and LCSS compared to IMRT (HR_OS: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68-0.89, HR_LCSS: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.60-0.81) and 3DCRT (HR_OS: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.72-0.93, HR_LCSS: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.93). SBRT-treated patients also had lower overall adjusted complication rates compared to IMRT (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99) and 3DCRT (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71).ConclusionFor patients with NSCLC tumors > 5 cm, SBRT trends towards fewer toxicities and improved survival compared to other forms of radiotherapy. Our findings support SBRT as an appropriate treatment strategy for older patients with larger inoperable NSCLC tumors.     

Lung stereotactic radiation therapy: Intercomparison of irradiation devices in terms of outcome and predictive factors

PurposeTo compare three different radiotherapy devices able to perform pulmonary stereotactic radiotherapy: CyberKnife® (CK), Helical Tomotherapy® (HT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This study aims to define the patients’ outcome in terms of SBRT efficacy and toxicities depending of the device choice.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical, radiological, and dosimetric data of patients treated with lung SBRT between 2016 and 2020 at Lausanne University Hospital, using the Chi² test for proportions, the t-test for means comparisons, the Kaplan-Meier method for survival, and the Log-rank test and Cox-regression for intergroups comparisons.ResultsWe identified 111 patients treated by either CK (59.9%), VMAT (38.0%), or HT (2.1%). Compared to other techniques, CK treated comparable gross tumor volume (GTV; 2.1 vs. 1.4 cm³, P = 0.84) with smaller planning treatment volume (PTV; 12.3 vs. 21.9 cm³, P = 0.013) and lower V5 (13.5 vs. 19.9 cm³, P = 0.002). Local control rates at 2 years were not different whatever the irradiation device, respectively of 96.2% (range, 90.8–100) and 98.1% (range, 94.4–100), P = 0.68. Toxicity incidence significantly increased with V5 value > 17.2% (56.0 vs. 77.4%, P = 0.021).ConclusionCompared to other SBRT techniques, CK treatments permitted to treat comparable GTV with reduced PTV and V5. Toxicity incidence was less frequent when reducing the V5. CK is particularly attractive in case of multiple courses of lung SBRT or lung reirradiation.     

Radiation pneumonitis in patients treated for malignant pulmonary lesions with hypofractionated radiation therapy

Purpose

We evaluated the relationship between the mean lung dose (MLD) and the incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and compared this with conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT).

Materials and methods

For both SBRT (n = 128) and CFRT (n = 142) patients, RP grade ?2 was scored. Toxicity models predicting the probability of RP as a function of the MLD were fitted using maximum log likelihood analysis. The MLD was NTD (Normalized Total Dose) corrected using an α/β ratio of 3 Gy.

Results

SBRT patients were treated with 6-12 Gy per fraction with a median MLD of 6.4 Gy (range: 1.5-26.5 Gy). CFRT patients were treated with 2 Gy or 2.25 Gy per fraction, the median MLD was 13.2 Gy (range: 3.0-23.0 Gy). The crude incidence rates of RP were 10.9% and 17.6% for the SBRT and CFRT patients, respectively. A significant dose-response relationship for RP was found after SBRT, which was not significantly different from the dose-response relationship for CFRT (p = 0.18).

Conclusion

We derived a significant dose-response relationship between the risk of RP and the MLD for SBRT from the clinical data. This relation was not significantly different from the dose-response relation for CFRT, although statistical analysis was hampered by the low number of patients in the high dose range.     

Long-term Follow-up and Patterns of Recurrence of Patients With Oligometastatic NSCLC Treated With Pulmonary SBRT

IntroductionThis multicenter study aims to analyze outcome as well as early versus late patterns of recurrence following pulmonary stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with oligometastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and MethodsThis analysis included 301 patients with oligometastatic NSCLC treated with SBRT for 336 lung metastases. Although treatment of the primary tumor consisted of surgical resection, radiochemotherapy, and/or systemic therapy, pulmonary oligometastases were treated with SBRT.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 16.1 months, resulting in 2-year overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant control (DC) of 62.2%, 82.0%, and 45.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age (P = .019) and histologic subtype (P = .028), as well as number of metastatic organs (P < .001) as independent prognostic factors for OS. LC was superior for patients with favorable histologic subtype (P = .046) and SBRT with a higher biological effective dose at isocenter (P = .037), whereas DC was inferior for patients with metastases in multiple organs (P < .001) and female gender (P = .027). Early (within 24 months) local or distant progression was observed in 15.3% and 36.5% of the patients. After 24 months, the risk of late local failure was low, with 3- and 4-year local failure rates of only 4.0%, and 7.6%. In contrast, patients remained at a high risk of distant progression with 3- and 4-year failure rates of 13.3% and 24.1%, respectively, with no plateau observed.ConclusionSBRT for pulmonary oligometastatic NSCLC resulted in favorable LC and promising OS. The dominant failure pattern is distant with a continuously high risk of disease progression for many years.     

Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Lung Toxicity After Multiple Courses of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundThe clinical outcomes of multicourse lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have yet to be validated in a prospective study, and there are a lack of data on allowable composite dosimetry.Patients and MethodsForty-four patients underwent multicourse lung SBRT for recurrent or metachronous NSCLC. The median biologically effective dose (BED₁₀) for the first course and subsequent courses were 132 and 100 Gy, respectively. Patient and treatment characteristics were evaluated to determine the correlation with the development of radiation pneumonitis (RP).ResultsThe local control rate was 91%. A total of 13.6% developed a grade 2+ RP, and 4.5% developed a grade 3+ RP, including one grade 5. On univariable analysis, multiple composite dosimetric factors (V₅ [proportion of lung structure receiving at least 5 Gy], V₁₀, V₂₀, V₄₀, and mean lung dose) were correlated with the development of RP. When comprised of the first and second course of SBRT, a composite lung V₅ of < 30% and > 50% was associated with a 0 and 75% incidence of grade 2+ RP, respectively. We identified no significant correlation on multivariable analysis but observed a strong trend between composite lung V₅ and the development of grade 2+ RP (hazard ratio, 1.157; P = .058). Evaluation of multiple clinical factors also identified a significant correlation between the timing of repeat lung SBRT and the development of grade 2+ RP after the second course (P = .0028).ConclusionSubsequent courses of lung SBRT, prescribed to a median BED₁₀ of 100 Gy, can provide a high rate of local control with a 4.5% incidence of grade 3+ toxicity. Composite lung V₅ and the timing of the second course of lung SBRT may be correlated to the development of RP.     

A Volumetric Dosimetry Analysis of Vertebral Body Fracture Risk After Single Fraction Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PurposeVertebral compression fractures (VCF) are a common and severe complication of spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We sought to analyze how volumetric dosimetry and clinical factors were associated with the risk of VCF.Methods and MaterialsWe evaluated 173 spinal segments that underwent single fraction SBRT in 85 patients from a retrospective database. Vertebral bodies were contoured and dosimetric values were calculated. Competing risk models were used to evaluate the effect of clinical and dosimetry variables on the risk of VCF.ResultsOur primary endpoint was development of a post-SBRT VCF. New or progressive fractures were noted in 21/173 vertebrae (12.1%); the median time to fracture was 322 days. Median follow-up time was 426 days. Upon multivariable analysis, the percentages of vertebral body volume receiving >20 Gy and >24 Gy were significantly associated with increased risk of VCF (hazard ratio, 1.036, 1.104; P = .029, .044, respectively). No other patient or treatment factors were found to be significant on multivariable analysis. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the percentages of vertebral body volume receiving >20 Gy and >24 Gy required to obtain 90% sensitivity for predicting vertebral body fracture were 24% and 0%, respectively.ConclusionsVCF is a common complication after SBRT, with a crude incidence of 12.1%. Treatment plans that permit higher volumes receiving doses >20 Gy and >24 Gy to the vertebral body are associated with increased risk of VCF. To achieve 90% sensitivity for predicting VCF post-SBRT, the percentage of vertebral volume receiving >20 Gy should be <24% and maximum point dose should be <24 Gy. These results may help guide clinicians when evaluating spine SBRT treatment plans to minimize the risk of developing posttreatment VCF.     

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Salvage Treatment of Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PurposeThis study analyzes the outcomes and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as salvage treatment for recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods and MaterialsThis retrospective analysis considered patients treated with thoracic SBRT and a history of prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), SBRT, or surgical resection for NSCLC. Follow-up included positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging at 2- to 3-month intervals. Key outcomes were presented with the Kaplan–Meier method.ResultsForty patients with 52 treatments were included at a mean of 11.82 months after treatment with EBRT (n = 21), SBRT (n = 15), surgical resection (n = 9), and SBRT after EBRT (n = 7). Median imaging and clinical follow-up were 13.39 and 19.01 months, respectively. SBRT delivered a median dose of 40 Gy in 4 fractions. Median biologically effective dose (BED) was 79.60 Gy. Median gross tumor volume and planning target volume were 10.80 and 26.25 cm³, respectively. Local control was 65%, with a median time to local failure of 13.52 months. Local control was 87% after previous SBRT but only 33% after surgery. Median overall survival was 24.46 months, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.11 months. Patients presenting after previous SBRT had improved local control (P = .021), and the same result was obtained including patients with SBRT after EBRT (P = .0037). Treatments after surgical resection trended toward worse local control (P = .061). Patients with BED ≥80 Gy had improved local PFS (P = .032), PFS (P = .021), time without any treatment failure (P = .033), and time to local failure (P = .041). Using the Kaplan–Meier method, BED ≥80 Gy was predictive of improved local PFS (P = .01) and PFS (P < .005). Toxicity consisted of 10 instances of grade <3 toxicity (16%) and no grade ≥3 toxicity.ConclusionsSalvage treatment for recurrent NSCLC with SBRT was effective and well tolerated, particularly after initial treatment with SBRT. When possible, salvage SBRT should aim to achieve a BED of ≥80 Gy.     

Improved Survival Outcomes in Medically Fit Patients With Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

IntroductionStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to result in excellent disease control rates for early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It remains unknown which patients would most benefit from SBRT in treating NSCLC.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 346 patients treated with SBRT for early-stage NSCLC at 2 institutions (86 patients from City of Hope National Medical Center and 260 patients from The Newport Beach Radiosurgery Center/Hoag Hospital) from February 2010 to July 2019. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The omnibus test of model coefficients was performed to study the associations between clinical factors and OS. Survival analyses were performed by the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression.ResultsUnder the univariate analysis, variables associated with a decreased likelihood of death included age < 65 years (P = .040) and being a surgical candidate (P = .010). Multivariate analysis found that surgical candidates still had a significantly decreased likelihood of death compared to nonsurgical candidates (Hazard ratio 0.360, 95% confidence interval 0.153-0.848, P = .019). Median OS was significantly increased for surgical candidates versus nonsurgical candidates (83 vs 53 months, P = .017). The local failure rate was 9.1%, the locoregional failure rate was 12.7%, and the distant failure rate was 10.7%.ConclusionPatients who are deemed to be candidates for surgery have improved OS compared to those who are not when treated with SBRT. This raises the question of selection bias in trials comparing surgery with SBRT in NSCLC, as patients who are deemed to be surgical candidates and then go on to undergo surgery may have an inherent OS benefit.