Myocardial Injury on CMR in Patients With COVID-19 and Suspected Cardiac Involvement

BackgroundMyocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 and suspected cardiac involvement is not well understood.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to characterize myocardial injury in a multicenter cohort of patients with COVID-19 and suspected cardiac involvement referred for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).MethodsThis retrospective study consisted of 1,047 patients from 18 international sites with polymerase chain reaction–confirmed COVID-19 infection who underwent CMR. Myocardial injury was characterized as acute myocarditis, nonacute/nonischemic, acute ischemic, and nonacute/ischemic patterns on CMR.ResultsIn this cohort, 20.9% of patients had nonischemic injury patterns (acute myocarditis: 7.9%; nonacute/nonischemic: 13.0%), and 6.7% of patients had ischemic injury patterns (acute ischemic: 1.9%; nonacute/ischemic: 4.8%). In a univariate analysis, variables associated with acute myocarditis patterns included chest discomfort (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.17-3.40, P = 0.01), abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.12-3.23; P = 0.02), natriuretic peptide elevation (OR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.60-5.58; P = 0.0006), and troponin elevation (OR: 4.21; 95% CI: 2.41-7.36; P < 0.0001). Variables associated with acute ischemic patterns included chest discomfort (OR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.04-9.49; P = 0.04), abnormal ECG (OR: 4.06; 95% CI: 1.10-14.92; P = 0.04), known coronary disease (OR: 33.30; 95% CI: 4.04-274.53; P = 0.001), hospitalization (OR: 4.98; 95% CI: 1.55-16.05; P = 0.007), natriuretic peptide elevation (OR: 4.19; 95% CI: 1.30-13.51; P = 0.02), and troponin elevation (OR: 25.27; 95% CI: 5.55-115.03; P < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, troponin elevation was strongly associated with acute myocarditis patterns (OR: 4.98; 95% CI: 1.76-14.05; P = 0.003).ConclusionsIn this multicenter study of patients with COVID-19 with clinical suspicion for cardiac involvement referred for CMR, nonischemic and ischemic patterns were frequent when cardiac symptoms, ECG abnormalities, and cardiac biomarker elevations were present.     

Heart and Lung Multimodality Imaging in COVID-19

The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 outbreak has rapidly reached pandemic proportions and has become a major threat to global health. Although the predominant clinical feature of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is an acute respiratory syndrome of varying severity, ranging from mild symptomatic interstitial pneumonia to acute respiratory distress syndrome, the cardiovascular system can be involved in several ways. As many as 40% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 have histories of cardiovascular disease, and current estimates report a proportion of myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 of up to 12%. Multiple pathways have been suggested to explain this finding and the related clinical scenarios, encompassing local and systemic inflammatory responses and oxygen supply-demand imbalance. From a clinical point of view, cardiac involvement during COVID-19 may present a wide spectrum of severity, ranging from subclinical myocardial injury to well-defined clinical entities (myocarditis, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and heart failure), whose incidence and prognostic implications are currently largely unknown because of a significant lack of imaging data. Integrated heart and lung multimodality imaging plays a central role in different clinical settings and is essential in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with COVID-19. The aims of this review are to summarize imaging-oriented pathophysiological mechanisms of lung and cardiac involvement in COVID-19 and to provide a guide for integrated imaging assessment in these patients.     

Screening of Potential Cardiac Involvement in Competitive Athletes Recovering From COVID-19: An Expert Consensus Statement

As our understanding of the complications of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) evolve, subclinical cardiac pathology such as myocarditis, pericarditis, and right ventricular dysfunction in the absence of significant clinical symptoms represents a concern. The potential implications of these findings in athletes are significant given the concern that exercise, during the acute phase of viral myocarditis, may exacerbate myocardial injury and precipitate malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Such concerns have led to the development and publication of expert consensus documents aimed at providing guidance for the evaluation of athletes after contracting COVID-19 in order to permit safe return to play. Cardiac imaging is at the center of these evaluations. This review seeks to evaluate the current evidence regarding COVID-19–associated cardiovascular disease and how multimodality imaging may be useful in the screening and clinical evaluation of athletes with suspected cardiovascular complications of infection. Guidance is provided with diagnostic “red flags” that raise the suspicion of pathology. Specific emphasis is placed on the unique challenges posed in distinguishing athletic cardiac remodeling from subclinical cardiac disease. The strengths and limitations of different imaging modalities are discussed and an approach to return to play decision making for athletes post–COVID-19, as informed by multimodality imaging, is provided.     

Cardiac Involvement in Patients Recovered From COVID-2019 Identified Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ObjectivesThis study evaluated cardiac involvement in patients recovered from coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).BackgroundMyocardial injury caused by COVID-19 was previously reported in hospitalized patients. It is unknown if there is sustained cardiac involvement after patients’ recovery from COVID-19.MethodsTwenty-six patients recovered from COVID-19 who reported cardiac symptoms and underwent CMR examinations were retrospectively included. CMR protocols consisted of conventional sequences (cine, T2-weighted imaging, and late gadolinium enhancement [LGE]) and quantitative mapping sequences (T1, T2, and extracellular volume [ECV] mapping). Edema ratio and LGE were assessed in post–COVID-19 patients. Cardiac function, native T1/T2, and ECV were quantitatively evaluated and compared with controls.ResultsFifteen patients (58%) had abnormal CMR findings on conventional CMR sequences: myocardial edema was found in 14 (54%) patients and LGE was found in 8 (31%) patients. Decreased right ventricle functional parameters including ejection fraction, cardiac index, and stroke volume/body surface area were found in patients with positive conventional CMR findings. Using quantitative mapping, global native T1, T2, and ECV were all found to be significantly elevated in patients with positive conventional CMR findings, compared with patients without positive findings and controls (median [interquartile range]: native T1 1,271 ms [1,243 to 1,298 ms] vs. 1,237 ms [1,216 to 1,262 ms] vs. 1,224 ms [1,217 to 1,245 ms]; mean ± SD: T2 42.7 ± 3.1 ms vs. 38.1 ms ± 2.4 vs. 39.1 ms ± 3.1; median [interquartile range]: 28.2% [24.8% to 36.2%] vs. 24.8% [23.1% to 25.4%] vs. 23.7% [22.2% to 25.2%]; p = 0.002; p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively).ConclusionsCardiac involvement was found in a proportion of patients recovered from COVID-19. CMR manifestation included myocardial edema, fibrosis, and impaired right ventricle function. Attention should be paid to the possible myocardial involvement in patients recovered from COVID-19 with cardiac symptoms.     

Cardiovascular Considerations for Patients,Health Care Workers,and Health Systems During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 that has significant implications for the cardiovascular care of patients. First, those with COVID-19 and pre-existing cardiovascular disease have an increased risk of severe disease and death. Second, infection has been associated with multiple direct and indirect cardiovascular complications including acute myocardial injury, myocarditis, arrhythmias, and venous thromboembolism. Third, therapies under investigation for COVID-19 may have cardiovascular side effects. Fourth, the response to COVID-19 can compromise the rapid triage of non-COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular conditions. Finally, the provision of cardiovascular care may place health care workers in a position of vulnerability as they become hosts or vectors of virus transmission. We hereby review the peer-reviewed and pre-print reports pertaining to cardiovascular considerations related to COVID-19 and highlight gaps in knowledge that require further study pertinent to patients, health care workers, and health systems.     

Feature Tracking Myocardial Strain Incrementally Improves Prognostication in Myocarditis Beyond Traditional CMR Imaging Features

ObjectivesThis study investigated the association of cardiovascular cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) with outcome in a patient cohort with myocarditis and evaluated the possible incremental prognostic benefit beyond clinical features and traditional CMR features.BackgroundCMR is used to diagnose and risk stratify patients with myocarditis. CMR-FT allows quantitative strain analysis of myocardial function; however, its prognostic benefit in myocarditis is unknown.MethodsConsecutive patients with clinically suspected myocarditis and presence of midmyocardial or epicardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and/or myocardial edema in CMR were included. Clinical and CMR features were analyzed with regard to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (i.e., hospitalization for heart failure, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and all-cause mortality).ResultsOf 740 patients with clinically suspected myocarditis, 455 (61%) met our final diagnostic criteria based on CMR tissue characterization. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, MACE occurred in 74 (16%) patients. In the univariable analysis, CMR-FT global longitudinal peak strain (GLS) was significantly associated with MACE. In a multivariable model adjusting for clinical variables (age, sex, body mass index, and acuteness of symptoms) and traditional CMR features (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] and LGE extent), GLS remained independently associated with outcome (GLS hazard ratio: 1.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.36; p = 0.001) and incrementally improved prognostication (chi-square increases from 42.6 to 79.8 to 88.5; p < 0.001).ConclusionsMyocardial strain using CMR-FT provides independent and incremental prognostic value over clinical features, LVEF, and LGE in patients with myocarditis. CMR-FT may serve as a novel marker to improve risk stratification in myocarditis. (CMR Features in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis [CMRMyo]; NCT03470571)     

Pathological Evidence for SARS-CoV-2 as a Cause of Myocarditis: JACC Review Topic of the Week

To investigate whether severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)–induced myocarditis constitutes an important mechanism of cardiac injury, a review was conducted of the published data and the authors’ experience was added from autopsy examination of 16 patients dying of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Myocarditis is an uncommon pathologic diagnosis occurring in 4.5% of highly selected cases undergoing autopsy or endomyocardial biopsy. Although polymerase chain reaction–detectable virus could be found in the lungs of most coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)–infected subjects in our own autopsy registry, in only 2 cases was the virus detected in the heart. It should be appreciated that myocardial inflammation alone by macrophages and T cells can be seen in noninfectious deaths and COVID-19 cases, but the extent of each is different, and in neither case do such findings represent clinically relevant myocarditis. Given its extremely low frequency and unclear therapeutic implications, the authors do not advocate use of endomyocardial biopsy to diagnose myocarditis in the setting of COVID-19.     

Myocardial Injury and Fibrosis From Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: A Prospective Observational Study

ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) after carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging (CMRI) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE).BackgroundIn acute CO poisoning, cardiac injury can predict mortality. However, it remains unclear why increased mortality and cardiovascular events occur despite normalization of CO-induced elevated troponin I (TnI) and cardiac dysfunction.MethodsPatients with acute CO poisoning with elevated TnI were evaluated. CMRI was performed within 7 days of CO exposure and after 4 to 5 months. Patients were divided into LGE (n = 72; 69.2%) and no-LGE (n = 32; 30.8%) groups.ResultsIn the LGE group, 39.4%, 4.8%, and 25.0% of patients exhibited midwall, subendocardial, and right ventricular insertion point injury, respectively. Diffuse injury was observed in 22.1% of patients, and 67.6% of the 37 patients who underwent follow-up CMRI showed no interval change. On TTE, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain were significantly deteriorated in the LGE group; serial TTE within 7 days indicated that only left ventricular global longitudinal strain remained significantly deteriorated. Three cases of mortality occurred in the LGE group during the 1-year follow-up.ConclusionsThe LGE prevalence in patients with acute CO poisoning with elevated TnI levels, with no underlying cardiovascular diseases and eligible for CMRI, was 69.2%; this proportion primarily comprised patients with a midwall injury. Of the 37 patients who underwent follow-up CMRI, most chronic phase images showed no interval change. Myocardial fibrosis detected on CMR images was related to acute myocardial dysfunction and subacute deterioration of myocardial strain on TTE. (Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Image in Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning; NCT04419298)     

Clinical Applications of FDG-PET Scan in Arrhythmic Myocarditis

Background¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan has no recognized role in diagnosis, prognosis, and disease monitoring in patients with arrhythmic myocarditis.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate the value of FDG-PET scan in arrhythmic myocarditis.MethodsThe authors enrolled 75 consecutive patients (age 47 ± 14 years, 65% men) undergoing FDG-PET scan for arrhythmic myocarditis. Myocarditis was diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and, whenever applicable, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).ResultsIndications for FDG-PET scan included either contraindication to CMR (n = 50) or mismatch between CMR and EMB (n = 25). Overall, 50 patients (67%) had positive FDG-PET. Sensitivity was 75% referring to EMB, and 73% to CMR. Specificity was 67% referring to EMB, and 59% to CMR. FDG-PET accuracy was lower in the presence of borderline myocarditis, and either late (>30 days) or on-immunosuppression FDG-PET scanning. Anteroseptal distribution pattern, found in 12 of 50 (24%) patients including 7 of 7 cardiac sarcoidosis cases, was associated with greater occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and atrioventricular blocks in 4.2 ± 1.7 years of follow-up (10 of 12 vs 7 of 38, and 7 of 12 vs 0 of 38, respectively; both P < 0.001). In 39 patients (52%), FDG-PET was repeated by 13 ± 2 months, allowing immunosuppression withdrawal after FDG uptake normalization either by first (76%) or second reassessment (24%).ConclusionsFDG-PET scan may be a clinically useful diagnostic technique in arrhythmic myocarditis, in particular when CMR is unsuitable because of irregular heartbeat or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator–related artifacts. Anteroseptal FDG distribution is associated with a worse arrhythmic outcome and should raise the suspicion of cardiac sarcoidosis. During follow-up, repeated FDG-PET allows myocarditis monitoring to guide immunosuppression withdrawal.     

Early Comprehensive Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

ObjectivesThe objective of the SMINC-2 (Stockholm Myocardial Infarction With Normal Coronaries 2) study was to determine if more than 70% of patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA), investigated early with comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), could receive a diagnosis entirely by imaging.BackgroundThe etiology of MINOCA is heterogeneous, including coronary, cardiac, and noncardiac causes. Patients with MINOCA, therefore, represent a diagnostic challenge where CMR is increasingly used.MethodsThe SMINC-2 study was a prospective study of 148 patients with MINOCA imaged with 1.5-T CMR with T₁ and extracellular volume mapping early after hospital admission, compared to 150 patients with MINOCA imaged using 1.5-T CMR without mapping techniques from the SMINC-1 study as historic controls.ResultsCMR was performed at a median of 3 (SMINC-2) versus 12 (SMINC-1) days after hospital admission. In total, 77% of patients received a diagnosis with CMR imaging in the SMINC-2 study compared to 47% in the SMINC-1 study (p < 0.001). Compared to SMINC-1, CMR in SMINC-2 detected higher proportions of myocarditis (17% vs. 7%; p = 0.01) and takotsubo syndrome (35% vs. 19%; p = 0.002) but similar proportions of myocardial infarction (22% vs. 19%; p = 0.56) and other cardiomyopathies (3% vs. 2%; p = 0.46).ConclusionsThe results of the SMINC-2 study show that 77% of all patients with MINOCA received a diagnosis when imaged early with CMR, including advanced tissue characterization, which was a considerable improvement in comparison to the SMINC-1 study. This supports the use of early CMR imaging as a diagnostic tool in the investigation of patients with MINOCA. (Stockholm Myocardial Infarction With Normal Coronaries [SMINC]-2 Study on Diagnosis Made by Cardiac MRI [SCMINC-2]; NCT02318498)     

Myocardial T1 and T2 Mapping by Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Associated Myocarditis

BackgroundMyocarditis is a potentially fatal complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Data on the utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 and T2 mapping in ICI myocarditis are limited.ObjectivesThis study sought to assess the value of CMR T1 and T2 mapping in patients with ICI myocarditis.MethodsIn this retrospective study from an international registry of patients with ICI myocarditis, clinical and CMR findings (including T1 and T2 maps) were collected. Abnormal T1 and T2 were defined as 2 SD above site (vendor/field strength specific) reference values and a z-score was calculated for each patient. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were a composite of cardiovascular death, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and complete heart block.ResultsOf 136 patients with ICI myocarditis with a CMR, 86 (63%) had T1 maps and 79 (58%) also had T2 maps. Among the 86 patients (66.3 ± 13.1 years of age), 36 (41.9%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction <55%. Across all patients, mean z-scores for T1 and T2 values were 2.9 ± 1.9 (p < 0.001) and 2.2 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001), respectively. On Siemens 1.5-T scanner (n = 67), native T1 (1,079.0 ± 55.5 ms vs. 1,000.3 ± 22.1 ms; p < 0.001) and T2 (56.2 ± 4.9 ms vs. 49.8 ± 2.2 ms; p < 0.001) values were elevated compared with reference values. Abnormal T1 and T2 values were seen in 78% and 43% of the patients, respectively. Applying the modified Lake Louise Criteria, 95% met the nonischemic myocardial injury criteria and 53% met the myocardial edema criteria. Native T1 values had excellent discriminatory value for subsequent MACE, with an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 0.98). Native T1 values (for every 1-unit increase in z-score, hazard ratio: 1.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.84; p = 0.004) but not T2 values were independently associated with subsequent MACE.ConclusionsThe use of T1 mapping and application of the modified Lake Louise Criteria provides important diagnostic value, and T1 mapping provides prognostic value in patients with ICI myocarditis.     

Myocarditis in Relation to Angiographic Findings in Patients With Provisional Diagnoses of MINOCA

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of myocarditis among patients presenting with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in relation to the angiographic severity of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).BackgroundMINOCA represents about 6% of all cases of acute myocardial infarction. Myocarditis is a diagnosis that may be identified by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with a provisional diagnosis of MINOCA.MethodsA systematic review was performed to identify studies reporting the results of CMR findings in MINOCA patients with nonobstructive CAD or normal coronary arteries. Study-level and individual patient data meta-analyses were performed using fixed- and random-effects methods.ResultsTwenty-seven papers were included, with 2,921 patients with MINOCA; CMR findings were reported in 2,866 (98.1%). Myocarditis prevalence was 34.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.2% to 42.2%) overall and was numerically higher in studies that defined MINOCA as myocardial infarction with angiographically normal coronary arteries compared with a definition that permitted nonobstructive CAD (45.9% vs. 32.3%; p = 0.16). In a meta-analysis of individual patient data from 9 of the 27 studies, the pooled prevalence of CMR-confirmed myocarditis was greater in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries than in those with nonobstructive CAD (51% [95% CI: 47% to 56%] vs. 23% [95% CI: 18% to 27%]; p < 0.001). Men and younger patients with MINOCA were more likely to have myocarditis. Angiographically normal coronary arteries were associated with increased odds of myocarditis after adjustment for age and sex (adjusted odds ratio: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.12 to 4.71; p = 0.023).ConclusionsPatients with a provisional diagnosis of MINOCA are more likely to have CMR findings consistent with myocarditis if they have angiographically normal coronary arteries.     

Prognostic Role of CMR and Conventional Risk Factors in Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructed Coronary Arteries

ObjectivesThis study sought to assess the prognostic impact of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and conventional risk factors in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronaries (MINOCA).BackgroundMyocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) represents a diagnostic dilemma, and the prognostic markers have not been clarified.MethodsA total of 388 consecutive patients with MINOCA undergoing CMR assessment were identified retrospectively from a registry database and prospectively followed for a primary clinical endpoint of all-cause mortality. A 1.5-T CMR was performed using a comprehensive protocol (cines, T2-weighted, and late gadolinium enhancement sequences). Patients were grouped into 4 categories based on their CMR findings: myocardial infarction (MI) (embolic/spontaneous recanalization), myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, and normal CMR.ResultsCMR (performed at a median of 37 days from presentation) was able to identify the cause for the troponin rise in 74% of the patients (25% myocarditis, 25% MI, and 25% cardiomyopathy), whereas a normal CMR was identified in 26%. Over a median follow-up of 1,262 days (3.5 years), 5.7% patients died. The cardiomyopathy group had the worst prognosis (mortality 15%; log-rank test: 19.9; p < 0.001), MI had 4% mortality, and 2% in both myocarditis and normal CMR. In a multivariable Cox regression model (including clinical and CMR parameters), CMR diagnosis of cardiomyopathy and ST-segment elevation on presentation electrocardiogram (ECG) remained the only 2 significant predictors of mortality. Using presentation with ECG ST-segment elevation and CMR diagnosis of cardiomyopathy as risk markers, the mortality risk rates were 2%, 11%, and 21% for presence of 0, 1, and 2 factors, respectively (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsIn a large cohort of patients with MINOCA, CMR (median 37 days from presentation) identified a final diagnosis in 74% of patients. Cardiomyopathy had the highest mortality, followed by MI. The strongest predictors of mortality were a CMR diagnosis of cardiomyopathy and ST-segment elevation on presentation ECG.     

International Impact of COVID-19 on the Diagnosis of Heart Disease

BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has adversely affected diagnosis and treatment of noncommunicable diseases. Its effects on delivery of diagnostic care for cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of death worldwide, have not been quantified.ObjectivesThe study sought to assess COVID-19’s impact on global cardiovascular diagnostic procedural volumes and safety practices.MethodsThe International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a worldwide survey assessing alterations in cardiovascular procedure volumes and safety practices resulting from COVID-19. Noninvasive and invasive cardiac testing volumes were obtained from participating sites for March and April 2020 and compared with those from March 2019. Availability of personal protective equipment and pandemic-related testing practice changes were ascertained.ResultsSurveys were submitted from 909 inpatient and outpatient centers performing cardiac diagnostic procedures, in 108 countries. Procedure volumes decreased 42% from March 2019 to March 2020, and 64% from March 2019 to April 2020. Transthoracic echocardiography decreased by 59%, transesophageal echocardiography 76%, and stress tests 78%, which varied between stress modalities. Coronary angiography (invasive or computed tomography) decreased 55% (p < 0.001 for each procedure). In multivariable regression, significantly greater reduction in procedures occurred for centers in countries with lower gross domestic product. Location in a low-income and lower–middle-income country was associated with an additional 22% reduction in cardiac procedures and less availability of personal protective equipment and telehealth.ConclusionsCOVID-19 was associated with a significant and abrupt reduction in cardiovascular diagnostic testing across the globe, especially affecting the world’s economically challenged. Further study of cardiovascular outcomes and COVID-19–related changes in care delivery is warranted.     

High-Resolution Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance for the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructed Coronary Arteries

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) including high-resolution (HR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging using a 3-dimensional respiratory-navigated method in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA).BackgroundCMR plays a pivotal role for the diagnosis of patients with MINOCA. However, the diagnosis remains inconclusive in a significant number of patients, the results of CMR being either negative or uncertain (i.e., compatible with multiple diagnoses).MethodsConsecutive patients categorized as having MINOCA after blood testing, electrocardiography, coronary angiography, and echocardiography underwent conventional CMR, including cine, T2-weighted, first-pass perfusion, and conventional breath-held LGE imaging. HR LGE imaging using a free-breathing method allowing improved spatial resolution (voxel size 1.25 × 1.25 × 2.5 mm) was added to the protocol when the results of conventional CMR were inconclusive and was optional otherwise. Diagnoses retained after reviewing conventional CMR were compared with those retained after the addition of HR LGE imaging.ResultsFrom 2013 to 2016, 229 patients were included (mean age 56 ± 17 years, 45% women). HR LGE imaging was performed in 172 patients (75%). In this subpopulation, definite diagnoses were retained after conventional CMR in 86 patients (50%): infarction in 39 (23%), myocarditis in 32 (19%), takotsubo cardiomyopathy in 13 (8%), and other diagnoses in 2 (1%). In the remaining 86 patients (50%), results of CMR were inconclusive: negative in 54 (31%) and consistent with multiple diagnoses in 32 (19%). HR LGE imaging led to changes in final diagnosis in 45 patients (26%) and to a lower rate of inconclusive final diagnosis (29%) (p < 0.001). In particular, HR LGE imaging could reveal or ascertain the diagnosis of infarction in 14% and rule out the diagnosis of infarction in 12%. HR LGE imaging was particularly useful when the results of transthoracic echocardiography, ventriculography, and conventional CMR were negative, with a 48% rate of modified diagnosis in this subpopulation.ConclusionsHR LGE imaging has high diagnostic value in patients with MINOCA and inconclusive findings on conventional CMR. This has major diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications.     

Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis Undergoing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

BackgroundRisk-stratification of myocarditis is based on functional parameters and tissue characterization of the left ventricle (LV), whereas right ventricular (RV) involvement remains mostly unrecognized.ObjectivesIn this study, the authors sought to analyze the prognostic value of RV involvement in myocarditis by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).MethodsPatients meeting the recommended clinical criteria for suspected myocarditis were enrolled at 2 centers. Exclusion criteria were the evidence of coronary artery disease, pulmonary artery hypertension or structural cardiomyopathy. Biventricular ejection fraction, edema according to T2-weighted images, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were linked to a composite end point of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including heart failure hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmia, recurrent myocarditis, and death.ResultsAmong 1,125 consecutive patients, 736 (mean age: 47.8 ± 16.1 years) met the clinical diagnosis of suspected myocarditis and were followed for 3.7 years. Signs of RV involvement (abnormal right ventricular ejection fraction [RVEF], RV edema, and RV-LGE) were present in 188 (25.6%), 158 (21.5%), and 92 (12.5%) patients, respectively. MACE occurred in 122 patients (16.6%) and was univariably associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV edema, LV-LGE, RV-LGE, RV edema, and RVEF. In a series of nesting multivariable Cox regression models, the addition of RVEF (HR_adj: 0.974 [95% CI: 0.956-0.993]; P = 0.006) improved prognostication (chi-square test = 89.5; P = 0.001 vs model 1; P = 0.006 vs model 2) compared with model 1 including only clinical variables (chi-square test = 28.54) and model 2 based on clinical parameters, LVEF, and LV-LGE extent (chi-square test = 78.93).ConclusionsThis study emphasizes the role of RV involvement in myocarditis and demonstrates the independent and incremental prognostic value of RVEF beyond clinical variables, CMR tissue characterization, and LV function. (Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy Bern Registry [FlamBER]; NCT04774549; CMR Features in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis [CMRMyo]; NCT03470571)     

Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in MINOCA: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundMyocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is common in current clinical practice. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) plays an important role in its management and is increasingly recommended by all the current guidelines. However, the prognostic value of CMR in patients with MINOCA is still undetermined.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMR in the management of patients with MINOCA.MethodsA systematic review was performed to identify studies reporting the results of CMR findings in patients with MINOCA. Random effects models were used to determine the prevalence of different disease entities: myocarditis, myocardial infarction (MI), or takotsubo syndrome. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of CMR diagnosis in the subgroup of studies that reported clinical outcomes.ResultsA total of 26 studies comprising 3,624 patients were included. The mean age was 54.2 ± 5.3 years, and 56% were men. MINOCA was confirmed in only 22% (95% CI: 0.17-0.26) of the cases and 68% of patients with initial MINOCA were reclassified after the CMR assessment. The pooled prevalence of myocarditis was 31% (95% CI: 0.25-0.39), and takotsubo syndrome 10% (95% CI: 0.06-0.12). In a subgroup analysis of 5 studies (770 patients) that reported clinical outcomes, CMR diagnosis of confirmed MI was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (pooled OR: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.60-3.59).ConclusionsIn patients with MINOCA, CMR has been demonstrated to add an important diagnostic and prognostic value, proving to be crucial for the diagnosis of this condition. Sixty-eight percent of patients with initial MINOCA were reclassified after the CMR evaluation. CMR-confirmed diagnosis of MINOCA was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up.     

The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Phenotype Viewed Through the Prism of Multimodality Imaging: Clinical and Etiologic Implications

Noninvasive contemporary imaging with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provide comprehensive characterization of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) heart including precise definition of left ventricle (LV) wall thickness and reliable identification of morphologic abnormalities of the mitral valve, LV chamber, and myocardial tissue characterization with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (fibrosis). Imaging also contributes to identification of patients at risk for sudden death including novel high-risk features such as LV apical aneurysm and extensive LGE. Exercise (stress) echocardiography should be considered to demonstrate physiologic provocation of LV outflow gradients and to distinguish from patients with nonobstructive HCM. Multimodality imaging identifies patients who are optimal candidates for invasive septal reduction therapy and directs preoperative planning for extended myectomy and to optimize alcohol septal ablation. Contemporary imaging interwoven with current management strategies have resulted in a low HCM-related mortality rate.     

Prognostic Value of Vasodilator Stress Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction

ObjectivesThis study sought to assess the incremental prognostic value of vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI).BackgroundRecurrent MI is a major cause of mortality and morbidity among MI survivors.MethodsBetween 2008 and 2019, consecutive patients with prior MI referred for stress CMR were followed up for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined by cardiovascular mortality or recurrent nonfatal MI. Uni- and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to determine the prognostic value of inducible ischemia and the extent of myocardial scar.ResultsAmong 1,594 patients with prior MI and myocardial scar on CMR, 1,401 (92%) (68.2 ± 11.0 years; 61.4% men) completed the follow-up (median: 6.2 years), and 205 had MACE (14.6%). Patients without inducible ischemia experienced a lower annual rate of MACE (3.1%) than those with 1–2 (4.9%), 3–5 (21.5%), or ≥6 segments of ischemia (45.7%) (all p < 0.01). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the presence of inducible ischemia and the extent of scar were associated with MACE (hazard ratio [HR]:3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.67 to 4.65 and HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.53 to 2.18, respectively; both p < 0.001). In multivariable stepwise Cox regression, the presence of ischemia and the extent of scar were independent predictors of MACE (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 2.14 to 3.78 and HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.44 to 1.72, respectively; both p < 0.001). These findings were significant in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The addition of CMR parameters to the model including traditional risk factors resulted in a better discrimination for MACE (C-statistic: 0.76 vs. 0.62).ConclusionsIn patients with prior MI, vasodilator stress CMR has independent and incremental prognostic value over traditional risk factors.