Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric lignocaine for elective Caesarean section

This study was carried out in 30 patients undergoing elective Caesarean section to assess the predictability and reliability of spinal anaesthesia with 5% hyperbaric lignocaine, with a view to incorporating the technique in our failed intubation drill. The spinal was performed with a 25-gauge needle in either the sitting (15 patients) or left lateral position (15 patients). The speed of onset of anaesthesia to T6 was significantly faster (p less than 0.01) in the lateral group, but the duration of action was similar in both groups. Twelve patients had hypotension and four developed severe postspinal headaches. The block progressed to the C2 dermatome in four patients and was associated with dysphagia. This was totally unpredictable and may be due to altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in late pregnancy. Therefore, the use of spinal anaesthesia with heavy lignocaine may be inadvisable in obstetric patients, especially following failed intubation.     

Respiratory effects of spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

We report the changes observed in a number of pulmonary function tests performed on 36 patients undergoing Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. The tests comprised peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in one second, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio and the maximal mid-expiratory flow. Significant changes occurred that are consistent with a restrictive ventilatory defect. These changes persisted for four hours after the induction of spinal anaesthesia. Administration of 35% oxygen by facemask failed to change significantly fetal umbilical vein pH or partial pressure of oxygen.     

Subarachnoid anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section

Forty patients who underwent elective lower segment Caesarean section under subarachnoid anaesthesia received either 2.0 ml 0.5% cinchocaine in 6% dextrose or 2.5 ml 0.5% bupivacaine in 8% dextrose via a 26-gauge needle with the patient in the left lateral position. Onset time was rapid in both groups and the distribution of maximum ascent of sensory analgesia was T1-T6. Efficacy of analgesia was greater in the bupivacaine group, although the duration of both sensory and motor blockade was shorter than following cinchocaine. There were no significant differences between the two groups either in the incidence and severity of complications or in the condition of the neonates. The high incidence (50-65%) and often profound extent of hypotension seen throughout the trial, confirm the ineffectiveness of crystalloid preload of 1500 ml as a single prophylaxis against hypotension.     

An evaluation of a 30-gauge needle for spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

A 30-gauge spinal needle was evaluated for Caesarean section, using a combined epidural/spinal technique, in 50 mothers. Spinal anaesthesia failed in six mothers and was inadequate in another six. General anaesthesia was required on one occasion. A 25% overall failure rate suggests that a 30-gauge needle is not a practical proposition for routine clinical practice.     

Crystalloid versus colloid for circulatory preload for epidural Caesarean section

Sixty mothers were randomly allocated to receive either 2 litres of crystalloid or 1 litre of colloid solution (hydroxyethyl starch) in order to preload the circulation prior to elective Caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. There were no differences in the incidence of hypotension, degree of haemodilution, umbilical cord blood gas tensions or umbilical blood osmolalities between the two groups.     

Anaesthesia for Caesarean section in a patient with Charcot–Marie-Tooth disease

We describe the management of a 25-year-old primigravida with severe respiratory insufficiency secondary to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type I scheduled for Caesarean section. Incremental subarachnoid anaesthesia via a microcatheter was utilised. Mother and baby made an uneventful recovery and were discharged home on the tenth postoperative day.     

Some aspects of epidural block provided for elective Caesarean section

We present here clinical data from 993 patients who were destined to undergo elective Caesarean section under epidural analgesia. In 29 cases the attempt to provide an epidural was abandoned before the operation started. In regard to this, the importance of monitoring the fetal heart rate during initiation of the epidural is emphasised. In 10 cases general anaesthesia was induced after delivery, and in a further 108 cases supplemental analgesia was administered, either systemically, by inhalation or by an additional epidural top-up, after delivery. Satisfactory analgesia throughout the operation was achieved in 87.8%. In an appreciable proportion of cases the recommended maximum dose of bupivacaine, and the recommended maximum rate of bupivacaine administration, were exceeded without apparent complication. There was a tendency for the volume of Hartmann's solution infused intravenously before and during initiation of the epidural to be increased throughout the period under review (1971-85). The prevalence of hypotension diminished during that period. Characteristics of the data did not permit a close analysis of the main factors which could have led to an episode of maternal hypotension. However, it did appear that such an episode could be ascribed to too brief an interval between the first and second, or the second and third top-up doses. The frequency with which blood was transfused during operation was markedly lower than that noted in a concurrent series of elective sections conducted under general anaesthesia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Caesarean section for placenta praevia: a retrospective study of anaesthetic management

A retrospective survey of anaesthesia for Caesarean section(CS) for placenta praevia was performed, covering the periodbetween January 1, 1984 and December 31, 1998. Three hundredand fifty consecutive cases of placenta praevia were identified.Overall a regional technique was used 60% of the time. Fivewomen had a placenta accreta which required Caesarean hysterectomy:one had general anaesthesia (GA) throughout and four initiallyreceived a single-shot spinal injection. Of these latter fourcases, two were converted to GA during the hysterectomy andtwo continued with spinal anaesthesia throughout. Two otherwomen (both GA), suffered postoperative thrombotic episodes(one pulmonary embolus and one cerebral thrombosis) but madefull recoveries. Control of blood pressure when using regionalanaesthesia (RA), even in the presence of considerable haemorrhage,was not a problem. Statistical regression models indicated thatRA was associated with a significantly reduced estimated bloodloss and reduced need for blood transfusion. This retrospectivesurvey finds no data to support the much quoted aphorism thatRA is contraindicated for CS in the presence of placenta praevia.     

Regional anaesthesia for repeat Caesarean section in a patient with phantom limb pain

The triggering of phantom limb pain by subarachnoid or epidural anaesthesia has been well described leading to the suggestion that neuraxial regional anaesthesia is relatively contraindicated in lower limb amputees. We report our experience of the provision of anaesthesia for repeat Caesarean section on two occasions in such a patient. Intrathecal fentanyl and morphine supplementation of bupivacaine successfully abolished peri-operative phantom limb pain, whereas epidural anaesthesia was associated with recurrence of phantom limb pain upon regression of the block     

Combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

An evaluation of a 30 gauge spinal needle in a combined epidural/spinal anaesthetic technique for Caesarean section revealed a 25% failure rate of the spinal element. In this unit, no more than 4% of spinal anaesthetics might be expected to fail. One of the reasons for the higher failure rate was that, when using the Tuohy needle as an introducer, the dura was not identified. This prompted us to compare the 'through-the-Tuohy' or needle within needle approach for combined epidural/spinal anaesthesia, with a technique that involved siting the epidural and spinal sequentially in separate spaces. One hundred women requiring elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomised into single or double space groups. The technique failed in 16% of through-the-needle cases, and in 4% of sequential sitings. Combined spinal/epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section is more successful if each procedure is performed using separate spaces.     

Effect of intravenous cimetidine on lignocaine disposition during extradural Caesarean section

We studied whether an intravenous bolus of cimetidine altered the disposition of extradurally administered lignocaine in the parturient. Mothers who requested extradural analgesia for elective Caesarean section were randomly pretreated with either cimetidine 200 mg intravenously (n = 5) or no H2-receptor antagonist (n = 5). No difference was found between peak plasma lignocaine levels or area under the plasma concentration/time curve between the two groups after administration of 6 mg/kg lignocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:200,000. There was no evidence for an effect of a single intravenous dose of cimetidine on lignocaine disposition in the obstetric patient. In addition, the extradural administration of 6 mg/kg lignocaine produces plasma levels well below toxic levels.     

Regional anaesthesia with a subarachnoid microcatheter for Caesarean section in a parturient with aortic stenosis

We present a woman in her first pregnancy, with known aortic stenosis prior to conception, who successfully underwent regional anaesthesia for an elective Caesarean section using a subarachnoid microcatheter. The anaesthetic management of patients with aortic stenosis requiring noncardiac surgery is a complex and contentious matter, particularly when the situation is compounded by the physiological changes accompanying pregnancy and delivery. This is the first reported use of a subarachnoid microcatheter in such a patient. The choice of technique is discussed and compared with other options for providing anaesthesia.     

High-dose intrathecal diamorphine for analgesia after Caesarean section

Forty women undergoing elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine were randomly allocated to receive either 0.5 mg or 1 mg intrathecal diamorphine. All women received diclofenac 100 mg at the end of surgery and morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia system. Oral analgesics were not used. Postoperative analgesia was more prolonged and more reliable in the 1-mg group. Mean time to first analgesia was 10.2 h in the 1-mg group and 6.9 h in the 0.5-mg group, and 45% in the 1-mg group used no morphine, compared with 10% in the 0.5-mg group. Mean morphine consumption over 24 h was 5.2 mg in the 1-mg group and 10.6 mg in the 0.5-mg group. Pain scores all tended to be lower in the 1-mg group but this was only significant at 4 h. There were no serious side-effects. Minor side-effects were common but well tolerated, and the incidence did not differ between the groups. If intrathecal diamorphine is used in combination with rectal diclofenac and without oral analgesia, then 1 mg provides superior analgesia to 0.5 mg without any worsening of the side-effects.     

Fatal pulmonary embolism following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section

Pulmonary embolism remains one of the commonest causes of maternal death. Regional blockade is reported to decrease the incidence of postoperative thrombo-embolic disease. We describe a case in which a fatal pulmonary embolism followed an emergency Caesarean section for which the patient was given a spinal anaesthetic. We believe it to be the first time this has been reported.