A novel finding of the atrial substrate properties and long-term results of catheter ablation in chronic atrial fibrillation patients with left atrial spontaneous echo contrast

Atrial Substrate Properties in Chronic AF Patients with LASEC. Background: The atrial substrate in chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) has not been previously reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the atrial substrate properties and long‐term follow‐up results in the patients who received catheter ablation of chronic AF. Methods: Of 36 consecutive patients with chronic AF who received a stepwise ablation approach, 18 patients with an LASEC (group I) were compared with 18 age‐gender‐left atrial volume matched patients without an LASEC (group II). The atrial substrate properties including the weighted peak‐to‐peak voltage, total activation time during sinus rhythm (SR), dominant frequency (DF), and complex fractionated electrograms (CFEs) during AF in the bi‐atria were evaluated. Result: The left atrial weighted bipolar peak‐to‐peak voltage (1.0 ± 0.6 vs 1.6 ± 0.7 mV, P = 0.04), total activation time (119 ± 20 vs 103 ± 13 ms, P < 0.001) and DF (7.3 ± 1.3 vs 6.6 ± 0.7 Hz, P < 0.001) differed between group I and group II, respectively. Those parameters did not differ in the right atrium. The bi‐atrial CFEs (left atrium: 89 ± 24 vs 92 ± 25, P = 0.8; right atrium: 92 ± 25 vs 102 ± 3, P = 0.9) did not differ between group I and group II, respectively. After a mean follow‐up of 30 ± 13 month, there were significant differences in the antiarrhythmic drugs (1.1 ± 0.3 vs 0.7 ± 0.5, P = 0.02) needed after ablation, and recurrence as persistent AF (92% vs 50%, P = 0.03) between group I and group II, respectively. After multiple procedures, there were more group II patients that remained in SR, when compared with group I (78% vs 44%, P = 0.04). Conclusion: There was a poorer atrial substrate, lesser SR maintenance after catheter ablation and need for more antiarrhythmic drugs in the chronic AF patients with an LASEC when compared with those without an LASEC. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 1‐8)     

Characteristics and significance of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

Very Early Recurrence of AF. Introduction: Early restoration of sinus rhythm following ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and improves the long‐term outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors and outcome in patients with very early AF recurrences (< 2 days). Methods and Results: Ablation was performed in 339 consecutive AF patients (paroxysmal AF = 262). Biatrial voltage was mapped during sinus rhythm. If recurrent AF occurred within 2 days following the ablation, electrical cardioversion was performed to restore sinus rhythm. Very early recurrences of AF occurred in 39 (15%) patients with paroxysmal AF and 26 (34%) with nonparoxysmal AF. Patients with very early recurrence had a higher incidence of nonparoxysmal AF (40% vs 18.6%, P< 0.001), requirement of electrical cardioversion during procedure, larger left atrial (LA) diameter (43 ± 7 vs 39 ± 6 mm, P< 0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (54 ± 10% vs 59 ± 7, P< 0.001), longer procedural time, and lower LA voltage (1.5 ± 0.7 vs 1.9 ± 0.8 mV, P< 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that the independent predictors of a very early recurrence were a longer procedural time and lower LA voltage. During a follow‐up of 13 ± 5 months, a very early recurrence did not predict the long‐term outcome of a single procedure recurrence in the patients with paroxysmal AF, but was associated with a late recurrence in the nonparoxysmal AF patients. Conclusion: Very early recurrence occurred in patients with paroxysmal AF is not associated with long‐term recurrence. Nonparoxysmal AF is an independent predictor of late recurrence of AF in patients with very early recurrence. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 1‐6)     

Time to Cardioversion of Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Long‐Term Clinical Outcome

Introduction: It is unclear whether early restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and promotes long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the time to restoration of sinus rhythm after a recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia and long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Methods and Results: Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 384 consecutive patients (age 60 ± 9 years) for paroxysmal (215 patients) or persistent AF (169 patients). Transthoracic cardioversion was performed in all 93 patients (24%) who presented with a persistent atrial arrhythmia: AF (n = 74) or atrial flutter (n = 19) at a mean of 51 ± 53 days from the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and 88 ± 72 days from the ablation procedure. At a mean of 16 ± 10 months after the ablation procedure, 25 of 93 patients (27%) who underwent cardioversion were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. Among the 46 patients who underwent cardioversion at ≤30 days after the recurrence, 23 (50%) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. On multivariate analysis of clinical variables, time to cardioversion within 30 days after the onset of atrial arrhythmia was the only independent predictor of maintenance of sinus rhythm in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single ablation procedure (OR 22.5; 95% CI 4.87–103.88, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Freedom from AF/flutter is achieved in approximately 50% of patients who undergo cardioversion within 30 days of a persistent atrial arrhythmia after catheter ablation of AF.     

Substrate and procedural predictors of outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often accompanied by atrial fibrillation (AF) due to diastolic dysfunction, elevated left atrial pressure, and enlargement. Although catheter ablation for drug‐refractory AF is an effective treatment, the efficacy in HCM remains to be established. Methods: Thirty‐three consecutive patients (25 male, age 51 ± 11 years) with HCM underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (n = 8) or wide area circumferential ablation with additional linear ablation (n = 25) for drug‐refractory AF. Twelve‐lead and 24‐hour ambulating ECGs, echocardiograms, event monitor strips, and SF 36 quality of life (QOL) surveys were obtained before ablation and for routine follow‐up. Results: Twenty‐one (64%) patients had paroxysmal AF and 12 (36%) had persistent/permanent AF for 6.2 ± 5.2 years. The average ejection fraction was 0.63 ± 0.12. The average left atrial volume index was 70 ± 24 mL/m 2 . Over a follow‐up of 1.5 ± 1.2 years, 1‐year survival with AF elimination was 62%(Confidence Interval [CI]: 66‐84) and with AF control was 75%(CI: 66‐84). AF control was less likely in patients with a persistent/chronic AF, larger left atrial volumes, and more advanced diastolic disease. Additional linear ablation may improve outcomes in patient with severe left atrial enlargement and more advanced diastolic dysfunction. Two patients had a periprocedureal TIA, one PV stenosis, and one died after mitral valve replacement from prosthetic valve thrombosis. QOL scores improved from baseline at 3 and 12 months. Conclusion: Outcomes after AF ablation in patients with HCM are favorable. Diastolic dysfunction, left atrial enlargement, and AF subtype influence outcomes. Future studies of rhythm management approaches in HCM patients are required to clarify the optimal clinical approach.     

Efficacy of adjuvant anterior left atrial ablation during intracardiac echocardiography-guided pulmonary vein antrum isolation for atrial fibrillation

Background: Recent data have shown that the septum and anterior left atrial (LA) wall may contain “rotor” sites required for AF maintenance. However, whether adding ablation of such sites to standard ICE‐guided PVAI improves outcome is not well known. Objective: To determine if adjuvant anterior LA ablation during PVAI improves the cure rate of paroxysmal and permanent AF. Methods: One hundred AF patients (60 paroxysmal, 40 persistent/permanent) undergoing first‐time PVAI were enrolled over three months to receive adjuvant anterior LA ablation (Group I). These patients were compared with 100 randomly selected, matched first‐time PVAI controls from the preceding three months who did not receive adjuvant ablation (Group II). All 200 patients underwent ICE‐guided PVAI during which all four PV antra and SVC were isolated. In group I, a decapolar lasso catheter was used to map the septum and anterior LA wall during AF (induced or spontaneous) for continuous high‐frequency, fractionated electrograms (CFAE). Sites where CFAE were identified were ablated until the local EGM was eliminated. A complete anterior line of block was not a requisite endpoint. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Recurrence was assessed post‐PVAI by symptoms, clinic visits, and Holter at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients also wore rhythm transmitters for the first 3 months. Recurrence was any AF/AFL >1 min occurring >2 months post‐PVAI. Results: Patients (age 56 ± 11 years, 37% female, EF 53%± 11%) did not differ in baseline characteristics between group I and II by design. Group I patients had longer procedure time (188 ± 45 min vs 162 ± 37 min) and RF duration (57 ± 12 min vs 44 ± 20 min) than group II (P < 0.05 for both). Overall recurrence occurred in 15/100 (15%) in group I and 20/100 (20%) in group II (P = 0.054). Success rates did not differ for paroxysmal patients between group I and II (87% vs 85%, respectively). However, for persistent/permanent patients, group I had a higher success rate compared with group II (82% vs 72%, P = 0.047). Conclusions: Adjuvant anterior LA ablation does not appear to impact procedural outcome in patients with paroxysmal AF but may offer benefit to patients with persistent/permanent AF.     

Different patterns of atrial remodeling after catheter ablation of chronic atrial fibrillation

Atrial Substrate Remodeling After Chronic AF Ablation . Background: Multiple remodeling patterns have been observed after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective: We aimed to clarify the electrical/structural properties associated with recurrences after ablation of chronic AF. Methods: After a stepwise ablation procedure in 120 consecutive patients with persistent/long‐lasting persistent AF, 36 had a recurrence of AF (Group 1/Group 2: recurrence with paroxysmal/persistent AF, n = 16/20). Results: During the first procedure, the left atrial (LA) bipolar voltage did not differ between the 2 groups, and the LA volume was smaller in Group 1 than in Group 2 and it was the only factor predicting the recurrent types (P = 0.009, OR = 1.04). In the second procedure, the bipolar voltage of the global left atrium increased (1.33 ± 0.11 mV vs 1.76 ± 0.16 mV, P = 0.001) in Group 1 and decreased (1.31 ± 0.14 mV vs 0.90 ± 0.12 mV, P = 0.01) in Group 2, when compared with that of the first procedure. The LA low‐voltage area (<0.5 mV) decreased in Group 1, and increased in Group 2. The LA volume (90 ± 8 cm³ vs 72 ± 8 cm³, P = 0.002) decreased in the second procedure in Group 1. It remained the same in Group 2. The right atrial substrates did not change between the procedures. After a follow‐up of 27 ± 3 months, all patients in Group 1 and 14 patients in Group 2 remained in sinus rhythm (P = 0.02). Conclusion: A better outcome with reverse electrical and structural remodeling occurred after the ablation of chronic AF when the recurrence was paroxysmal AF. Progressive electrical remodeling without any structural remodeling developed in those with a recurrence involving persistent AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 385‐393)     

Preprocedural predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein antrum isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: long-term follow-up results

Predictors of Recurrence after AF Ablation. Introduction: The objective of this study was to identify the simple preprocedural parameters of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following single ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal AF during long‐term follow‐up period. Methods and Results: Consecutive 474 patients (61 ± 10 years; 364 males, left atrial (LA) diameter 37.6 ± 5.1 mm) with drug‐refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent AF ablation were analyzed. Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI), cavotricuspid isthmus line creation with bidirectional conduction block, and elimination of all non‐PV triggers of AF were performed in all patients. With a mean follow‐up of 30 ± 13 months after single procedure, 318 patients (67.1%) were in sinus rhythm without any antiarrhythmic drugs. Multivariate analysis using Cox's proportional hazards model, including the age, gender, duration of AF, body mass index, LA size, left ventricular ejection fraction, and presence of hypertension and structural heart disease as variables, demonstrated that LA size was an independent predictor of AF recurrences after PVAI with a 7.2% increase in the probability for every 1 mm increase in LA diameter (P = 0.0007). When the patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the LA diameter, the patients with moderate (40–50 mm) and severe dilatation (>50 mm) had a 1.30‐fold (P = 0.0131) and 2.14‐fold (P = 0.0057) increase, respectively, in the probability of recurrent AF as compared with the patients with normal LA diameter (≤40 mm). Conclusion : In the long‐term follow‐up period, LA size was the best preprocedural predictor of AF recurrence following single ablation procedure in the patients with paroxysmal AF, even in the patients with a relatively small LA. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 621‐625, June 2011)     

Impact of heart rhythm status on registration accuracy of the left atrium for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Introduction: Registration accuracy is of crucial importance to the successful use of image integration technique to facilitate atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. It is well known that a patient's heart rhythm can switch from sinus rhythm (SR) to AF or vice versa during an AF ablation procedure. However, the impact of the heart rhythm change on the accuracy of left atrium (LA) registration has not been studied. Methods: This study included 10 patients who underwent AF ablation. Prior to the ablation procedure, the patients had contrast‐enhanced cardiac CT scan obtained during SR (n = 7) or AF (n = 3). Using an image integration system (CartoMerge, Biosense Webster Inc.), LA CT surface reconstruction was registered to the real‐time mapping space represented by the LA electroanatomic map. To determine the effect of rhythm change on registration accuracy, LA registration was performed during both SR and AF in each study subject. The distance between the surface of the registered LA CT reconstruction and multiple real‐time LA electroanatomic map points (surface‐to‐point distance) was used as an index for LA registration error. The position error after rhythm change was defined as the surface‐to‐point distance between the surface of the LA CT reconstruction registered in the initial rhythm and the LA electroanatomic map points sampled during the second rhythm. Results: A total of 90 ± 12 and 92 ± 9.5 LA electroanatomic map points were sampled for registration during SR and AF, respectively. No significant difference was found in surface‐to‐point distance when comparing SR with AF as the underlying rhythm during registration (1.91 ± 0.24 vs 1.84 ± 0.38 mm, P = 0.60). The position error after rhythm change was not different from the surface‐to‐point distance of LA registration conducted during the initial rhythm (2.05 ± 0.39 vs 1.96 ± 0.29 mm, P = 0.4). The surface‐to‐point distance did not differ when comparing LA registration conducted during the same versus different rhythm from that during CT imaging (1.96 ± 0.29 vs 1.79 ± 0.32 mm, P = 0.13). Conclusions: Registration error did not differ between LA registrations conducted during the same versus different rhythm as was present during CT imaging. Rhythm changes between SR and AF did not introduce significant error to the LA registration process for catheter ablation of AF. These findings are reassuring and suggest that reregistration is not needed if a patient's rhythm changes from SR to AF or vice versa during an ablation procedure.     

Atrial size reduction as a predictor of the success of radiofrequency maze procedure for chronic atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing concomitant valvular surgery

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies showed that the surgical maze procedure can restore sinus rhythm and atrial transport function in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). However, no previous studies discussed the association of atrial size reduction and the success of sinus conversion by the radiofrequency (RF) maze procedure for chronic AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 119 chronic AF patients undergoing valvular operations were included in this study. Sixty-one patients received RF and cryoablation to create lesions in both atria to simulate the surgical maze II or III procedure (RF maze II or RF maze III; 13 patients, group 1) or a modified maze pattern (RF maze "IV"; 48 patients, group 2). The other 58 patients who underwent valvular operations alone without the maze procedure served as control (group 3). At 3-month follow-up after operation, sinus rhythm was restored in 73%, 81%, and 11% of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Preoperative left and right atrial sizes were not statistically significant predictors of sinus conversion by the RF maze procedure. However, as a result of postoperative reduction of atrial sizes, postoperative left atrial diameter was significantly smaller in patients who had sinus conversion by the RF maze procedure than in patients who did not regain sinus rhythm (45.0+/-7.0 mm vs 51.0+/-8.0 mm; P = 0.03). Postoperative right atrial area of patients who had sinus conversion by the RF maze procedure also was significantly smaller than that of patients who did not regain sinus rhythm (18.1+/-4.4 cm2 vs 28.5+/-8.2 cm2; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Atrial size reduction appears to predict the success of sinus conversion with the RF maze procedure used in conjunction with valvular surgery.     

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency for Pulmonary Vein Re‐Isolation After a Failed Initial Ablation Procedure in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation . Aim: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is associated with an important risk of early and late recurrence, necessitating repeat ablation procedures. The aim of this prospective randomized patient‐blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon (Cryo) versus radiofrequency (RF) ablation of PAF after failed initial RF ablation procedure. Methods: Patients with a history of symptomatic PAF after a previous failed first RF ablation procedure were eligible for this study. Patients were randomized to Cryo or RF redo ablation. The primary endpoint of the study was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia, including AF and left atrial flutter/tachycardia, after a second ablation procedure at 1 year of follow‐up. All patients were implanted with a cardiac monitor (Reveal XT, Medtronic) to continuously track the cardiac rhythm. Patients with an AF burden (AF%) ≤ 0.5% were considered AF‐free (Responders), while those with an AF% > 0.5% were classified as patients with AF recurrences (non‐Responders). Results: Eighty patients with AF recurrences after a first RF pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to Cryo (N = 40) or to RF (N = 40). Electrical potentials were recorded in 77 mapped PVs (1.9 ± 0.8 per patient) in Cryo Group and 72 PVs (1.7 ± 0.8 per patient) in RF Group (P = 0.62), all of which were targeted. In Cryo group, 68 (88%) of the 77 PVs were re‐isolated using only Cryo technique; the remaining 9 PVs were re‐isolated using RF. In RF group, all 72 PVs were successfully re‐isolated (P = 0.003 vs Cryo). By intention‐to‐treat, 23 (58%) RF patients were AF‐free vs 17 (43%) Cryo patients on no antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year (P = 0.06). Three patients had temporary phrenic nerve paralysis in the Cryo group; the RF group had no complications. Of the 29 patients who had only Cryo PVI without any RF ablation, 11 (38%) were AF‐free vs 20 (59%) of the 34 patients who had RF only (P = 0.021). Conclusion: When patients require a redo pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure for recurrent PAF, RF appears to be the preferred energy source relative to Cryo. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 24, pp. 274‐279, March 2013)     

A strategy of rapid cardioversion minimizes the significance of early recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after ablation for atrial fibrillation

A Strategy of Rapid Cardioversion. Background: The significance of early recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear. Atrial remodeling driven by these tachyarrhythmias can result in electrical, contractile, and structural changes that may impair long‐term therapy success. Aggressive attempts to restore sinus rhythm in the temporal period of healing after ablation might improve outcomes. Methods: A total of 1,759 AF ablations were performed at Intermountain Medical Center or LDS Hospital. A total of 455 of those were among patients requiring repeat ablations. Patients were instructed to take their pulse daily and, if greater than 100 bpm or irregular, present the following business day fasting to the clinic for evaluation and cardioversion if AF or atrial flutter (AFL) were present. Results: Of the ablations performed, a total of 515 (29%, age: 65.6 ± 11.2 years, male: 57.9%) developed AF/AFL that required cardioverison. The majority of these arrhythmias first occurred in the initial 90 days (63.7%) postablation. During this period, 62.8% were on an antiarrhythmic drug (AAD). Only 25.1% were using an AAD at 3 months. The majority of ablations (75.6%) who experienced AF/AFL within the first 90 days after ablation were in sinus rhythm with no AAD at 1 year. Further, 48% of those with the first recurrence from 90 to 180 days were in sinus rhythm with no AAD at 1 year. Conclusions: The time at which the first recurrence of AF/AFL occurs impacts long‐term outcomes. An aggressive strategy of rapid cardioversion postablation reduces the significance of recurrent AF/AFL during the first 6 months . (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 761‐766, July 2011)     

Left atrial deformation imaging with ultrasound based two-dimensional speckle-tracking predicts the rate of recurrence of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation after successful ablation procedures

Predict AF. Objective: Since predictors of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablation procedures are poorly defined, this prospective study was conducted to assess the value of left atrial (LA) deformation imaging with two‐dimensional speckle‐tracking (2D‐ST) to predict AF recurrences after successful ablation procedures. Methods and results: One hundred and three consecutive patients (age 58.1 ± 16.6 years, 72.8% male) with AF (76 paroxysmal, 27 persistent) and 30 matched controls underwent transthoracic echocardiography and 2D‐ST‐LA‐deformation analysis with assessment of LA‐radial and LA‐longitudinal strain (Sr, Sl), and velocities derived from the apical 4‐ and 2‐chamber views (4CV, 2CV). AF recurrence was assessed during 6 months of follow‐up. For determination of AF‐related LA changes, AF patients were compared to controls and patients with AF recurrences after ablation procedures (n = 30, 29.1%) were compared with patients who maintained sinus rhythm (n = 73, 70.9%). Atrial deformation capabilities were significantly reduced (P < 0.0005) in patients with AF (4CVSl 17.8 ± 13.5%; 4CVSr 22.3 ± 14.9%; 4CV‐velocities 2.53 ± 0.97 seconds) when compared with controls (4CVSl 31.3 ± 12.4%; 4CVSr 30.3 ± 9.1%; 4CV‐velocities 3.48 ± 1.01 cm/s). Independent predictors for AF recurrence after ablation procedures were 2CV‐LA‐global‐strain (Sr, P = 0.03; Sl, P = 0.003), 4CV‐LA‐gobal‐strain (Sr, P = 0.03; Sl, P = 0.02), and regional LA‐septal wall‐Sl (P = 0.008). LA‐global‐strain parameters were superior to regional LA function analysis for the prediction of AF recurrences, with cutoff values (cov), hazard ratios (HR), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were: 4CVSl cov, 10.79% (HR 27.8, P < 0.0005; PPV 78.8%, NPV 93.9%), 4CVSr cov, ?16.65% (HR 24.8, P < 0.0005; PPV 69.4%, NPV 96.6%), 2CVSl cov, 12.31% (HR 22.7, P < 0.0005; PPV 75.8%, NPV 95.3%), and 2CVSr cov, ?14.9% (HR 12.9, P < 0.0005; PPV 64.3%, NPV 93.2%). Conclusion: Compared with controls, AF itself seems to decrease LA deformation capabilities. The assessment of global LA strain with 2D‐ST identifies patients with high risk for AF recurrence after ablation procedures. This imaging technique may help to improve therapeutic guiding for patients with AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23 p. 247‐255, March 2012.)     

Catheter Ablation of Long‐Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Lesson from Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Catheter Ablation of Long‐Standing Persistent AF. Introduction: Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) is associated with a high success rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with long‐standing persistent AF, the ideal ablation strategy still remains a matter of debate. Methods and Results: Two‐hundred and five patients underwent catheter ablation for long‐standing persistent AF defined as continuous AF of more than 1‐year duration. In a first step, all patients underwent CPVI. If direct‐current cardioversion failed following CPVI, ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) was performed. The goal was conversion into sinus rhythm (SR) or, alternatively, atrial tachycardia (AT) with subsequent ablation. A total of 340 procedures were performed. CPVI alone was performed during 165 procedures in 124 of 205 (60.5%) patients. In the remaining 81 patients, additional CFAE ablation was performed in 45, left linear lesions for recurrent ATs in 44 and SVC isolation in 15 patients, respectively, resulting in inadvertent left atrial appendage isolation in 9 (4.4%) patients. After the initial ablation procedure, 67 of 199 patients remained in SR during a mean follow‐up of 19 ± 11 months. Six patients were lost to follow‐up. After a mean of 1.7 ± 0.8 procedures, 135 of 199 patients (67.8%) remained in SR. Eighty‐six patients (43.2%) remained in SR following CPVI performed as the sole ablative strategy. Conclusions: CPVI alone is sufficient to restore SR in 43.2% of patients with long‐standing persistent AF. Multiple procedures and additional ablation strategies with a significant risk of inadvertent left atrial appendage isolation are often required to maintain stable SR. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1085‐1093)     

Incidence of asymptomatic cerebral microthromboembolism after atrial fibrillation ablation guided by complex fractionated atrial electrogram

Cerebral Microthromboembolism After CFAE Ablation . Background: The incidence of cerebral thromboembolism after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ranges from 2% to 14%. This study investigated the incidence of cerebral thromboembolism after complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation with or without PVI. Methods: One hundred consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (50 paroxysmal and 50 persistent, including 10 longstanding) who underwent CFAE ablation combined with (n = 41, PVI+CFAE group) or without (n = 59, CFAE group) PVI were studied. Coronary angiography (CAG) was conducted with AF ablation in 5 cases in which coronary artery stenosis was suspected on 3D‐computed tomography. PVI was performed before CFAE ablation without circular catheter during AF. After termination of AF, additional ablation was performed to complete PVI with a circular catheter. All patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion‐weighted MRI and T2‐weighted MRI the day after ablation. Results: New thromboembolism was detected in 7.0%, and there was no significant difference between the 2 strategies (7.3% in PVI+CFAE group, 6.8% in CFAE group). CHADS2 score (1.6 ± 1.0 vs 0.8 ± 0.9, P < 0.05), left atrial volume (LAV; 83.8 ± 27.1 vs 67.8 ± 21.8, P < 0.05), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 53.1 ± 9.2 vs 65.1 ± 9.7, P < 0.01) were significantly different when comparing patients with or without thromboembolism. In multivariate analysis, LVEF (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84–0.99; P < 0.05) and concomitant CAG (OR 18.82; 95% CI, 1.77–200.00; P < 0.05) were important predictors of new cerebral thromboembolism. Conclusions: The incidence of cerebral microthromboembolism after CFAE ablation was not greater than previous reports in PVI. Cautious management is required during AF ablation, especially in the patients with low LVEF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 567–573, June 2012)     

Intraoperative Radiofrequency Ablation of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: A Left Atrial Curative Approach by Elimination of Anatomic "Anchor" Reentrant Circuits

INTRODUCTION: The percutaneous approach to radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation for curative treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an investigational technique, and the optimal composition of lesion lines is unknown. We tested an intraoperative RF ablation concept with elimination of left atrial anatomic "anchor" reentrant circuits. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 12 patients with an indication for valve surgery and chronic AF, a right atrial-transseptal approach was chosen for access to the left atrium. AF had been present for 4.3 +/- 3.9 years; the left atria measured 56 +/- 7 mm. Under direct vision, contiguous lesion lines were placed endocardially with temperature-guided RF energy applications for treatment of AF with a specially designed probe. The lesion lines were placed between the mitral annulus and the left lower pulmonary vein, further to the left upper pulmonary vein, from there to the right upper pulmonary vein, and finally to the right lower pulmonary vein. The antiarrhythmic ablation procedure lasted 19 +/- 4 minutes. One patient died postoperatively of low cardiac output. During follow-up of 11 +/- 6 months, chronic AF was ablated successfully in 9 of 11 patients (82%). Six patients were in stable sinus rhythm or intermittent pacemaker rhythm, and three patients were in sinus rhythm with intermittent atypical atrial flutter. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative RF energy application for induction of contiguous lesion lines is feasible. Elimination of anatomically defined "anchor" reentrant circuits within the left atrium prevented chronic AF in > 80% of the patients treated. Intraoperative validation of lesion line concepts for curative treatment of AF may be transferred to percutaneous ablation techniques.     

Time- and frequency-domain characteristics of atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

Ablation and Spectral Characteristics of Fibrillation. Background: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) have been considered to be helpful during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of CFAEs recorded during sinus rhythm (SR) and AF, and to determine their relationship to perpetuation of AF and clinical outcome. Methods and Results: Antral pulmonary vein isolation (APVI) was performed in 34 consecutive patients (age = 59 ± 10 years) with paroxysmal AF who presented in SR. Time‐ and frequency‐domain characteristics of electrograms recorded from the same sites in the coronary sinus (CS) were analyzed during SR and AF, before and during isoproterenol infusion. There was a modest correlation in fractionation index (FI: change in the direction of depolarization, r = 0.40, P = 0.001) and complexity index (CI: change in the polarity of depolarization, r = 0.41, P = 0.001), but not in the dominant frequency (DF) between SR and AF. There was no relationship between the DF and CI or FI during AF. Isoproterenol was associated with an increase in DF during AF (6.6 ± 0.9 vs 5.1 ± 0.6 Hz, P < 0.001) but had no effect on CI or FI (P = 0.6). A higher CI (58.3 ± 21.0/s vs 38.0 ± 21.0/s, P < 0.01), and FI (123.5 ± 44.8/s vs 75.6 ± 44.6/s, P < 0.01) during AF were associated with a lower likelihood of termination of AF during APVI and a higher probability of recurrent AF after ablation. Ratio of FI during AF to SR was also higher when AF persisted than terminated after APVI (29.7 ± 12.4 vs 19.1 ± 9.7, P = 0.002). However, time‐ or frequency‐domain parameters during SR were not predictive of termination or clinical outcome. Conclusions: Structural and functional properties of the atrial myocardium during AF contribute to electrogram complexity, which may indicate the presence of extra‐PV mechanisms of AF that are not eliminated by APVI. Mapping of complex electrograms in SR is not likely to be sufficient to identify drivers of AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 851‐857, August 2011)     

Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation and Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Ablation without Additional Substrate Modification for Treating Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

PV Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Introduction: Effectiveness of antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVAI) and ablation of non‐PV triggers (non‐PVTA) in controlling longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been reported. We sought to describe clinical outcomes with this ablation strategy in patients (pts) followed for at least 1 year. Methods: Two hundred pts underwent PVAI for longstanding persistent AF and were followed for recurrence. Thirty‐three pts with <1‐year follow‐up and 37 pts with additional RF atrial ablation were excluded, leaving 130 pts for analysis. Results: All 130 pts (108 men, mean LA 4.7 ± 0.6 cm, mean AF duration of 38 ± 44 months) underwent PVAI with entrance/exit block. In addition, 24 pts (15 pts during the initial procedure and 9 additional pts at repeat ablations) had 40 non‐PVTA, including 3 with AVNRT. During follow‐up, atrial flutter (AFL) was noted in 7 (5%) pts. The AF‐free survival after single procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) was 38%. Repeat AF or AFL ablation was performed in 37 pts (28%) with PV reconnection uniformly identified (3.7 ± 0.5 veins/pt). During mean follow‐up of 41.1 ± 23.8 months (range 12–103 months), 85/130 pts (65%) were in sinus rhythm with 65 pts (50%) off AAD, 20 pts (15%) on AAD. Additionally, 9 pts (7%) have had rare episodes of AF such that 72% of pts have had good long‐term clinical outcome. Of the 36 pts with recurrent AF, 20 pts have not had a repeat procedure. Conclusions: PVAI with non‐PVTA for longstanding persistent AF provides good long‐term AF control in over 70% of patients with infrequent (5%) AFL. AAD therapy and repeat PVAI may be required for this optimal outcome. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 806‐813, August 2012)     

Acute effects of left atrial radiofrequency ablation on atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Acutely, when left atrial ablation is performed during atrial fibrillation (AF), the AF may persist and require cardioversion, or it may convert to sinus rhythm or to atrial tachycardia/flutter. The prevalence of these acute outcomes has not been described. METHODS AND RESULTS: Left atrial ablation, usually including encirclement of the pulmonary veins, was performed during AF in 144 patients with drug-refractory AF. Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 19 patients (13%), to left atrial tachycardia in 6 (4%), and to atrial flutter in 6 (4%). In the 6 patients with a focal atrial tachycardia, the mean cycle length was 294 +/- 45 ms. The tachycardia arose in the left atrial roof in 3 patients, the left atrial appendage in 2, and the anterior left atrium in 1. In 3 of 6 patients, the focal atrial tachycardia originated in an area that displayed a relatively short cycle length during AF. In 6 patients, AF converted to macroreentrant atrial flutter with a mean cycle length of 253 +/- 47 ms, involving the mitral isthmus in 5 patients and the septum in 1 patient. All atrial tachycardias and flutters were successfully ablated with 1 to 15 applications of radiofrequency energy. CONCLUSION: When left atrial ablation is performed during AF, the AF may convert to atrial tachycardia or flutter in approximately 10% of patients. Focal atrial tachycardias that occur during ablation of AF may be attributable to driving mechanisms that persist after AF has been eliminated, whereas atrial flutter results from incomplete ablation lines.     

Role of Residual Potentials Inside Circumferential Pulmonary Veins Ablation Lines in the Recurrence of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Residual Potentials After Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Background: Residual gaps due to incomplete ablation lines are known to be the most common cause of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation. We hypothesized that any residual potentials at the junction of the left atrium and pulmonary vein (PV), inside the circumferential PV ablation (CPVA) lines, would contribute to the recurrence of AF or post‐AF ablation atrial flutter (AFL); therefore, the elimination of these potentials increases AF‐/AFL‐free survival rates. Methods and Results: One hundred and two patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) were enrolled and prospectively randomized to a group with ablation of residual potentials as add‐on therapy to CPVA + PV electrical isolation (PVI) (group 1, n = 49), or a group without ablation of the residual potentials (group 2, n = 53). Post‐CPVA residual potentials, inside the ablation lines, were identified by contact bipolar electrode mapping catheter and a detailed 3‐dimensional voltage map. Twenty‐three patients in group 1 and 18 patients in group 2 had post‐CPVA residual potentials (46.9% vs 34.0%, P = 0.182). The AF‐/AFL‐free survival rate during follow‐up of 23.3 ± 7.9 months was not different in comparisons between the 2 groups (P = 0.818), and 79.6% and 81.1% of the patients in groups 1 and 2 maintained a sinus rhythm (P = 0.845), respectively. Conclusions: Residual potentials inside CPVA were commonly found in the patients with PAF after CPVA + PVI. Further ablation of residual potentials did not increase the efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with PAF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 959‐965, September 2010)     

Right and Left Atrial Radiofrequency Catheter Therapy of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Introduction: (AF), trial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia, is due to multiple simultaneous wavelets of reentry in the atria. The only available curative treatment is surreal, using atriotomies to compartmentalize the atria. Therefore, we investigated a staged anatomical approach using radiofrequency catheter ablation lines to prevent paroxysmal AF. Methods and Results: Forty-live patients with frequent symptomatic drug-refractory episodes of paroxysmal AF were studied. Progressively complex linear lesions were created by sequential applications of radiofrequency current in the right atrium and then in the left atrium if required. The outcome of the procedure was considered a success when the episodes of AF were either eliminated or recurred at a rate of no more than one episode (lasting < 6 hours) in 3 months. Patients who had no more than one episode per month were considered “improved.” Right atrial ablation organized local electrical activity and led to stable sinus rhythm during the procedure in 18 (40%) of the 45 patients. However, sustained AF remained inducible in 40 of 45 patients, and the lesions failed to produce evidence of a significant linear conduction block/delay in all but four patients. There were no significant complications except for two transient sinus node dysfunctions. The procedure duration and fluoroscopic time were 248 ± 79 and 53 ± 11 min, respectively. Additional sessions were required in 19 patients to treat sustained right atrial flutter or arrhythmias linked to ectopic right or left atrial foci. During a mean follow-up of 11 ± 4 months, right atrial ablation was successful in 15 (33%) patients, ft without medication and 9 with a previously ineffective drug. Nine (20%) additional patients were improved. Ten patients with an unsuccessful outcome then underwent linear ablation in the left atrium. The procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were 292 ± 94 and 66 ± 24 min. A hemopericardium occurred in one patient. Two patients required reablation to treat ectopic atrial foci. Left atrial ablation terminated AF during the procedure in 8 patients, and sustained AF could not he induced in 5. Subsequent success was achieved in A (60%) patients, including 4 without medication, and 1 additional patient was improved. Conclusions: Successful radiofrequency catheter ablation of drug-refractory daily paroxysmal AF is feasible using linear atrial lesions complemented by focal ablation targeted at arrhythmogenic foci. Ablation only in the right atrium is a safe technique providing limited success, whereas linear lesions in the left atrium significantly increase the incidence of stable restoration of sinus rhythm, the inability to induce sustained AF, and the final success rate. The described technique is promising hut must he considered preliminary because significant Improvements are required to optimize lesion characteristics and shorten total procedure duration.