鼻咽癌调强放射治疗的剂量学特点

[目的]分析鼻咽癌调强放疗各个靶区和周围正常器官的剂量学特点.[方法]2004年7月至10月入院的10例初治鼻咽癌调强放疗病人,用前7野方案,每野的照射范围从颅底到锁骨上淋巴预防区.剂量处方是:GTV1为2.18Gy/次,32次,GTV2为2.03Gy/次,32次,CTV1为1.88Gy/次,32次,CTV2为1.80Gy/次,28次.研究GTV的最大、最小和平均剂量,CTV的最小剂量,脊髓、脑干和晶状体的最大剂量,腮腺的50%体积受照剂量.[结果]10例病人GTV1的最大、最小和平均剂量(均值)分别是72.01Gy、68.65Gy、70.48Gy,GTV2的最大、最小和平均剂量(均值)分别是68.66y、65.50Gy、66.98Gy,CTV1的最小剂量为60.10Gy,CTV2的最小剂量为51.18Gy,脊髓、脑干和晶体状的最大剂量分别为44.7Gy、51.7Gy和6.8Gy,高剂量侧和低剂量侧,腮腺的50%体积的受照剂量分别为44.39Gy和39.36Gy.[结论]调强放疗可以使各个靶区得到足够的、均匀的剂量分布,周围的正常组织受到比较好的保护,腮腺50%体积受照剂量控制在40Gy～45Gy,显示已有较好的保护作用.     

鼻咽癌调强放疗初步结果

目的:探讨鼻咽癌三维适形调强放射治疗(intensity-modulatedradiotherapy,IMRT)的初步疗效。方法:对91例经病理确诊的鼻咽低分化鳞癌患者进行调强放疗。处方剂量分别为GTV(鼻咽部和颈部淋巴结肿瘤靶区)66~70Gy,CTV1(临床靶区)60~62Gy,CTV2和CTVn(颈部淋巴结区域)54~56Gy。11例患者IMRT结束后有局部残留,1例采用IMRT追量照射10Gy/4次,其余给予鼻咽腔内后装追量照射9~15Gy/3~5次。分析疗效及放射治疗毒性。结果:中位随访时间12个月,1和2年生存率为97·1%和97·1%,局控率为97·1%和92·5%。急性放射反应多为Ⅰ度和Ⅱ度以口干和放射性口腔炎为主,分别占72·5%和58·2%。远期放射反应表现为不同程度的口干和听力下降,占患者的39·6%和17·6%。GTV、CTV1及CTV2的平均剂量分别为70·6、67·9和65·0Gy;5%体积的正常器官受照射剂量的平均值为:脑干41·4Gy,脊髓35·4Gy,左腮腺46·5Gy,右腮腺51·8Gy。结论:调强放疗能使得鼻咽癌各靶区得到很好的剂量分布,提高了初治鼻咽癌的局部控制率,明显减轻了急性放射反应。鼻咽癌IMRT处方剂量70Gy以上,CTV2预防照射的范围有待于进一步探讨。     

Intensity-modulated radiation treatment for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma--the University of Iowa experience

PURPOSE: To review the University of Iowa experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From October 1999 to April 2004, 151 patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma were treated with IMRT for curative intent. One patient was lost to follow-up 2 months after treatment and therefore excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 150 patients, 99 were treated with definitive IMRT, and 51 received postoperative IMRT. Sites included were nasopharynx, 5; oropharynx, 56; larynx, 33; oral cavity, 29; hypopharynx, 8; nasal cavity/paranasal sinus, 8; and unknown primary, 11. None of the patients treated with postoperative IMRT received chemotherapy. Of 99 patients who had definitive IMRT, 68 patients received concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy. One patient received induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but no concurrent chemotherapy was given. Three clinical target volumes (CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3) were defined. The prescribed doses to CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3 in the definitive cohort were 70-74 Gy, 60 Gy, and 54 Gy, respectively. For high-risk postoperative IMRT, the prescribed doses to CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3 were 64-66 Gy, 60 Gy, and 54 Gy, respectively. For intermediate-risk postoperative IMRT, the prescribed doses to CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3 were 60 Gy, 60 Gy, and 54 Gy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 18 months (range, 2-60 months). All living patients were followed for at least 6 months. There were 11 local-regional failures: 7 local failures, 3 regional failures, and 1 failure both in the primary tumor and regional lymph node. There were 16 patients who failed distantly, either with distant metastasis or new lung primaries. The 2-year overall survival, local progression-free survival, locoregional progression-free survival, and distant disease-free survival rates were 85%, 94%, 92%, and 87%, respectively. The median time from treatment completion to local-regional recurrence was 4.7 months (range, 1.8 to 15.6 months). Only one marginal failure was noted in a patient who had extensive tonsil cancer with tumor extension into the orbit and cavernous sinus. Patients with oropharyngeal cancer did significantly better than patients with oral cavity and laryngeal cancer, with a 2-year local-regional control rate of 98%, compared with 78% for oral cavity cancer and 85% for laryngeal cancer (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in local-regional control for patients who received postoperative radiation or definitive radiation (p = 0.339) and for patients who had chemotherapy or not (p = 0.402). Neither T stage nor N stage had a significant effect on local-regional control (p = 0.722 and 0.712, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results have confirmed the effectiveness of IMRT in head-and-neck cancer. It offers excellent outcomes in local-regional control and overall survival. More studies are necessary to further improve the outcomes of laryngeal cancer as well as oral cavity cancer.     

Three-dimensional intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the University of California-San Francisco experience

PURPOSE: To review our experience with three-dimensional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the records of 35 patients who underwent 3D IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the University of California-San Francisco between April 1995 and March 1998. According to the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging classification, 4 (12%) patients had Stage I disease, 6 (17%) had Stage II, 11 (32%) had Stage III, and 14 (40%) had Stage IV disease. IMRT of the primary tumor was delivered using one of the following three techniques: (1) manually cut partial transmission blocks, (2) computer-controlled autosequencing static multileaf collimator (MLC), and (3) Peacock system using a dynamic multivane intensity-modulating collimator (MIMiC). A forward 3D treatment-planning system was used for the first two methods, and an inverse treatment planning system was used for the third method. The neck was irradiated with a conventional technique using lateral opposed fields to the upper neck and an anterior field to the lower neck and supraclavicular fossae. The prescribed dose was 65-70 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and positive neck nodes, 60 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), and 50-60 Gy to the clinically negative neck. Eleven (32%) patients had fractionated high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy boost to the primary tumor 1-2 weeks following external beam radiotherapy. Thirty-two (91%) patients also received cisplatin during, and cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil after, radiotherapy. Acute and late normal tissue effects were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Local-regional progression-free, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, 5-49 months), the local-regional progression-free rate was 100%. The 4-year overall survival was 94%, and the distant metastasis-free rate was 57%. The worst acute toxicity was Grade 2 in 16 (46%) patients, Grade 3 in 18 (51%) patients and Grade 4 in 1 (3%) patient. The worst late toxicity was Grade 1 in 15 (43%), Grade 2 in 13 (37%), and Grade 3 in 5 (14%) patients. Only 1 patient had a transient Grade 4 soft-tissue necrosis. At 24 months after treatment, 50% of the evaluated patients had Grade 0, 50% had Grade 1, and none had Grade 2 xerostomia. Analysis of the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) showed that the average maximum, mean, and minimum dose delivered were 79.5 Gy, 75.8 Gy, and 56.5 Gy to the GTV, and 78.9 Gy, 71.2 Gy, and 45.4 Gy to the CTV, respectively. An average of only 3% of the GTV and 2% of the CTV received less than 95% of the prescribed dose. The average dose to 5% of the brain stem, optic chiasm, and right and left optic nerves was 48.3 Gy, 23.9 Gy, 15.0 Gy, and 14.9 Gy, respectively. The average dose to 1 cc of the cervical spinal cord was 41.7 Gy. The doses delivered were within the tolerance of these critical normal structures. The average dose to 50% of the right and left parotids, pituitary, right and left T-M joints, and ears was 43. 2 Gy, 41.0 Gy, 46.3 Gy, 60.5 Gy, 58.3 Gy, 52.0 Gy, and 52.2 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION: 3D intensity-modulated radiotherapy provided improved target volume coverage and increased dose to the gross tumor with significant sparing of the salivary glands and other critical normal structures. Local-regional control rate with combined IMRT and chemotherapy was excellent, although distant metastasis remained unabated.     

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience

PURPOSE: To update our experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 1995 and October 2000, 67 patients underwent IMRT for NPC at the University of California-San Francisco (UCSF). There were 20 females and 47 males, with a mean age of 49 (range 17-82). The disease was Stage I in 8 (12%), Stage II in 12 (18%), Stage III in 22 (33%), and Stage IV in 25 (37%). IMRT was delivered using three different techniques: 1) manually cut partial transmission blocks, 2) computer-controlled auto-sequencing segmental multileaf collimator (SMLC), and 3) sequential tomotherapy using a dynamic multivane intensity modulating collimator (MIMiC). Fifty patients received concomitant cisplatinum and adjuvant cisplatinum and 5-FU chemotherapy according to the Intergroup 0099 trial. Twenty-six patients had fractionated high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy boost and 1 patient had gamma knife radiosurgery boost after external beam radiotherapy.The prescribed dose was 65-70 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and positive neck nodes, 60 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), 50-60 Gy to the clinically negative neck, and 5-7 Gy in 2 fractions for the intracavitary brachytherapy boost. Acute and late normal tissue effects were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. The local progression-free, local-regional progression-free, distant metastasis-free rates, and the overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 31 months (range 7 to 72 months), there has been one local recurrence at the primary site. One patient failed in the neck. Seventeen patients developed distant metastases; 5 of these patients have died. The 4-year estimates of local progression-free, local-regional progression-free, and distant metastases-free rates were 97%, 98%, and 66% respectively. The 4-year estimate of overall survival was 88%. The worst acute toxicity documented was as follows: Grade 1 or 2 in 51 patients, Grade 3 in 15 patients, and Grade 4 in 1 patient. The worst late toxicity was Grade 1 in 20 patients, Grade 2 in 15 patients, Grade 3 in 7 patients, and Grade 4 in 1 patient. At 3 months after IMRT, 64% of the patients had Grade 2, 28% had Grade 1, and 8% had Grade 0 xerostomia. Xerostomia decreased with time. At 24 months, only one of the 41 evaluable patients had Grade 2, 32% had Grade 1, and 66% had Grade 0 or no xerostomia. Analysis of the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) showed that the average maximum, mean, and minimum dose delivered were 79.3 Gy, 74.5 Gy, and 49.4 Gy to the GTV, and 78.9 Gy, 68.7 Gy, and 36.8 Gy to the CTV. An average of only 3% of the GTV and 3% of the CTV received less than 95% of the prescribed dose. CONCLUSION: Excellent local-regional control for NPC was achieved with IMRT. IMRT provided excellent tumor target coverage and allowed the delivery of a high dose to the target with significant sparing of the salivary glands and other nearby critical normal tissues.     

Boron neutron capture therapy using mixed epithermal and thermal neutron beams in patients with malignant glioma-correlation between radiation dose and radiation injury and clinical outcome

PURPOSE: To clarify the correlation between the radiation dose and clinical outcome of sodium borocaptate-based intraoperative boron neutron capture therapy in patients with malignant glioma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The first protocol (P1998, n = 8) prescribed a maximal gross tumor volume (GTV) dose of 15 Gy. In 2001, a dose-escalated protocol was introduced (P2001, n = 11), which prescribed a maximal vascular volume dose of 15 Gy or, alternatively, a clinical target volume (CTV) dose of 18 Gy. RESULTS: The GTV and CTV doses in P2001 were 1.1-1.3 times greater than those in P1998. The maximal vascular volume dose of those with acute radiation injury was 15.8 Gy. The mean GTV and CTV dose in long-term survivors with glioblastoma was 26.4 and 16.5 Gy, respectively. A statistically significant correlation between the GTV dose and median survival time was found. In the 11 glioblastoma patients in P2001, the median survival time was 19.5 months and 1- and 2-year survival rate was 60.6% and 37.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dose escalation contributed to the improvement in clinical outcome. To avoid radiation injury, the maximal vascular volume dose should be <12 Gy. For long-term survival in patients with glioblastoma after boron neutron capture therapy, the optimal mean dose of the GTV and CTV was 26 and 16 Gy, respectively.     

49例复发鼻咽癌的调强适形放射治疗

目的 评价调强适形放射治疗(IMRT)对复发性鼻咽癌的疗效、放射反应以及对肿瘤的控制。方法 49例鼻咽局部复发的鼻咽癌患者(KPS≥80)均采用全程IMRT,其中伴有颈淋巴结转移的3例患者(N12例,N3l例)在IMRT后,给予PDD 5-Fu方案5～6个疗程化疗。结果 治疗计划结果显示,覆盖鼻咽GTV D95的平均剂量为68．09Gy,GTV V95的平均体积为98．46％,靶区内GTV、CTV1和CTV2的平均剂量分别为71．40Gy、63．63Gy和59．81Gy。49例患者的中位随访时间为9个月(3～16个月)。局部无进展生存率100％,IMRT结束时有3例(6．1％)出现局部残留,14例(28．6％)出现鼻咽腔黏膜坏死。结论 IMRT能有利覆盖肿瘤靶区而使邻近敏感器官获得有效分隔,对复发性鼻咽癌的再程放疗不失为一种有效方法。值得注意的是高剂量的鼻咽局部IMRT治疗对于复发性鼻咽癌容易导致鼻咽黏膜坏死,故应适当减少GTV的处方剂量以60～65Gv为宜。     

Compensator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: our experience in achieving dosimetric parameters and their clinical correlation

AimsTo review the Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre experience of using compensator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat head and neck cancer.Materials and methodsBetween October 2003 and August 2004, 18 patients underwent IMRT for head and neck cancer at our institution. IMRT was delivered using partial transmission high-resolution compensator blocks.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 13.3 months, two patients had residual disease and two failed in the gross tumour volume (GTV). The complete response rate after surgical salvage was 94.5%. Both the locoregional relapse-free and disease-free survival rates were 81.8%. The target coverage in terms of average maximum, mean and minimum dose (in Gy) delivered was 78.6, 73.5 and 58.4 to the GTV–planning target volume, 82.3, 70.9 and 47.3 to clinical target volume 1 (CTV1) and 82.9, 66.2 and 29.6 to CTV2. The dose constraint of 30 Gy to less than 50% of the contralateral parotid volume was achieved in 12 (66.7%) patients. If the dose constraint was revised to 35 Gy, at least 50% of the parotid volume was spared in 17 (94.5%) patients. On average, 75% of the contralateral parotid volume received a dose less than 35 Gy in 13 (72.3%) patients with grade I xerostomia, whereas this was 49.3% in five (27.7%) patients with grade II xerostomia, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001).ConclusionsIn our initial experience, compensator-based IMRT is feasible with regard to target coverage and parotid volume sparing. The parotid volume dose has significant clinical implications on the grade of xerostomia. Our results invoke rethinking into the issues of the parotid volume dose constraint in our subpopulation.     

43例鼻咽癌的调强适形放射治疗体会

目的介绍调强适形放射(IMRT)治疗鼻咽癌的效果。方法对43例初治或复发鼻咽癌患者给予IMRT,将照射靶体积划分为鼻咽大体肿瘤体积(GTVnx)、颈部大体肿瘤体积(GTVnd)、临床靶体积1(CTV1)、临床靶体积2(CTV2)。处方剂量GTVnx68Gy~74Gy,GTVnd60Gy~66Gy,CTV160Gy,CTV254Gy;共30次。34例接受放化综合治疗,9例接受单纯放疗。结果GTVnx、GTVnd、CTV1、CTV2的平均剂量分别为72.40Gy、67.83Gy、60.25Gy和64.85Gy。中位随访期9个月,局部无进展生存率100%;1例放疗后4月出现肝和肺转移。结论IMRT技术对初治或复发鼻咽癌病例均可获得理想的剂量分布,正常组织得到很好的保护,毒副反应可以耐受,临床疗效令人满意。     

30例脑胶质瘤的术后调强适形放射治疗

目的探讨术后脑胶质瘤调强适形放疗的临床疗效。方法30例脑胶质瘤予术后调强适形放疗,以90%~95%等剂量线包绕计划靶体积（PTV）。肿瘤靶体积（GTV）照射(58~70) Gy/(28~33)f,临床靶体积（CTV）照射(56~66) Gy/(28~33)f ,PTV照射(50.4~60) Gy/(28~33)f,1次/天,5f/w。结果完全缓解率（CR）23.3%（7/30）,部分缓解率（PR）66.7%（20/30）,稳定率为10%（3/30）。1、2、3年总生存率分别为93.3%、76.7%、60%。Ⅰ~Ⅱ级1、2、3年生存率分别为100%、94.1%、76.5%;Ⅲ~Ⅳ级1、2、3年生存率分别为84.6%、53.8%、38.5%。Ⅰ~Ⅱ级组与Ⅲ~Ⅳ级组相比差异有统计学意义（P=0.0153）。患者对治疗的耐受性良好,不良反应主要为颅高压症状,放射性脑水肿。结论脑胶质瘤术后调强适形放疗疗效好,无严重不良反应。     

初治鼻咽癌调强放疗布野及联合化疗的临床研究

[目的]研究鼻咽癌调强放射治疗(IMRT)的投照方式、近期临床疗效,以及单纯放疗和放、化疗结合的耐受性。[方法]2003年12月￣2005年12月157例初治鼻咽癌患者鼻咽和全颈及锁骨上全程实施前7野IMRT。鼻咽大体肿瘤体积(GTV1)、颈部大体肿瘤体积(GTV2)、临床靶体积1(CTV1)和临床靶体积2(CTV2)处方剂量分别为70Gy、66Gy、60Gy、50Gy,共32分次。88例患者行联合化疗。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,RTOG标准评价急性反应和晚期损伤。[结果]治疗计划结果显示,靶区内GTV1、GTV2、CTV1和CTV2的平均剂量分别为70.5Gy、67.0Gy、60.1Gy和51.2Gy。中位随访时间16个月,1、2年局部区域无进展和无远处转移生存率及总生存率分别为97.4%、94.9%和93.6%、89.4%及96.4%、92.7%。放化综合治疗组的口咽、黏膜反应及血液系统毒性明显高于单纯放疗组。患者近期毒副反应均可以耐受,口干症状随着治疗后时间的延长逐渐减轻。[结论]IMRT使靶体积照射剂量提高,而周围器官受照剂量降低,对初治鼻咽癌可获得理想的局部区域控制,放化综合治疗对控制远处转移有一定价值。     

Comparison with dose-volume histograms of two conformal irradiation techniques used for the treatment of T2N0M0 nasopharyngeal cancer, one with association of photons and protons and another with photons alone]

Purpose- There is a relationship between the local control rate of the nasopharyngeal cancer and the total dose delivered within the tumoral volume. In contrast, the relation between the dose and the irradiated volume and the risk of complication is not clearly defined. That is why, in patients presenting with a locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer, we compared the dose-volume distribution of irradiated tissues, obtained from two 3D conformal irradiation techniques.Patients and methods- Between January 2000 and June 2001, 5 patients, 3 males and 2 females, with a median age of 32 years and presenting with a T4N0M0 nasopharyngeal cancer received a chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy combined photons and protons beams and the platin-based chemotherapy was delivered in three intravenous injections at d1, 22, 43 of the irradiation. To calculate the dosimetry, a CT scan and a MRI were performed in all the patients. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated from the imagery, three clinical tumor volumes were defined, the CTV1 was the GTV and the whole nasopharynx, the CTV2 was the CTV plus a 10 mm-margin and the CTV3 was the CTV2 and the nodes areas (cervical and subclavicular). Prophylactic dose within node areas was 44 Gy. Prescribed doses within CTV2 and GTV or CTV1 were 54 Gy/CGE (Cobalt Gy Equivalent, for an EBR = 1,1) and 70 Gy/CGE, respectively. Irradiation was delivered with fractions of 1.8 or 2.0 Gy/CGE, with 44 Gy or 54 Gy by photons and with 16 or 26 CGE by protons. According to dose-volume histograms obtained from the dosimetry planning by protons and photons and from the theoretical dosimetry by photons lonely, for the different volumes of interest, GTV, CTV2, and organs at risk (optic nerves, chiasm, internal ears, brainstem, temporal lobes), we compared the averages of the maximum, minimum and mean doses and the averages of the volumes of organs of interest encompassed by different isodoses.Results- Calculated averages of minimum, maximum and mean doses delivered within GTV were superior for the treatment with combined photons and protons than with photons alone. The average GTV encompassed by the 70 Gy/CGE isodose was larger by 65% with the association compared to photons alone. The conformation ratio (tissue volume encompassed by the 95% isodose/GTV encompassed by the 95% isodose) was 3.1 with the association compared to 5.7 with photons alone. For the CTV2, there were no differences in different criteria according to the both irradiation techniques. For the critical, radiosensitive organs, the comparison of the majority of the criteria was in favour of the association of protons and photons. Overall, 78% of the criteria were in favour of the association.Conclusion- For locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer without clinical adenopathy, irradiation by photons and protons increases the tumor volume irradiated at the prescribed dose and decreases the volume or critical organs irradiated and the total dose delivered within them.     

鼻咽癌调强放疗的剂量学研究

 【摘要】目的 分析鼻咽癌调强放疗各个靶区和周围正常组织器官的剂量学特点。方法 2005年1月-2006年6月住院的30例初治鼻咽癌进行调强放疗，将鼻咽和颈部的靶体积勾画为鼻咽大体肿瘤体积（GTVnx）、颈部大体肿瘤体积(GTVnd)、临床靶体积1（CTV1）和临床靶体积2(CTV2)，处方剂量分别为70、66、60、60Gy/30F，鼻咽和上颈部靶体积采用IMRT技术照射、下颈部靶体积采用下颈前野常规照射。研究GTV、CTV的最大、最小、平均剂量和颞叶、脑干、脊髓、视神经、晶体、眼球的最大受照剂量及腮腺、颞下颌关节的50%体积受照剂量。结果 GTVnx的最大、最小、平均剂量（均值）分别为79.2、59.5、71.9Gy, GTVnd的最大、最小、平均剂量分别为77.1、63.6、72.1Gy，CTV1、CTV2的最小剂量分别为47.6、49.7Gy，颞叶、脑干、脊髓、视神经、晶体、眼球的最大受照剂量及腮腺、颞下颌关节的50%体积受照剂量63.2、48.6、44.7、59.3、6.9、25.9Gy和34.0、36.3Gy。结论 调强放疗可以使各个靶区得到足够的、均匀的剂量分布，周围正常组织器官得到较好的保护，但是要注意CTV的低剂量区。鼻咽癌调强放疗剂量分布优于常规放疗。     

Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE: To analyze the patterns of locoregional failure in patients with head-and-neck cancer treated with inverse planning intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 1997 and December 2000, 165 patients with histologically confirmed head-and-neck cancer were treated using a parotid-sparing inverse planning IMRT protocol. Thirty-nine patients who received either palliative repeat irradiation or IMRT as a boost were excluded from this analysis, leaving 126 patients for this analysis. Of the 126 patients, 30 were women and 96 were men (median age 56 years, range 13-84). Fifty-two patients (41%) received definitive IMRT. Of the 52 patients, 17 were treated with RT alone and 35 with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. Seventy-four patients (59%) received postoperative IMRT. The median follow-up was 26 months (range 12-55). IMRT was used only in the upper neck for salivary sparing. The lower neck was treated with a conventional AP low-neck port abutted to the inferior IMRT dose distribution border. The radiation dose was prescribed to the two clinical target volumes (CTVs) according to the assumed risk of containing disease. The mean dose for definitive IMRT patients was 72.64 +/- 4.83 Gy to CTV1 and 64.34 +/- 5.15 Gy to CTV2. The mean dose to CTV1 and CTV2 in postoperative cases was 68.53 +/- 4.71 Gy and 60.95 +/- 5.33 Gy, respectively. The locations of failure were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventeen locoregional failures (persistent or recurrent disease) were found. Of these 17 failures, 9 (53%) were inside CTV1. One failure (6%) was marginal to CTV1 but inside CTV2. One failure (6%) occurred outside CTV1 but inside CTV2. Another failure was marginal to CTV2. Of the 17 failures, 5 (28%) were found outside of the IMRT field and in the lower neck. Dose-volume histogram analysis revealed that for all but 1 patient, the recurrent/persistent disease within the CTVs received comparable or superior dose coverage relative to the CTV. The 2-year actuarial locoregional control rate was 85%, and the ultimate locoregional control rate after surgical salvage was 89%. We observed no dermal failure and only one marginal failure in the region adjacent to the spared parotid glands. CONCLUSION: We have shown that the target definition and coverage for patients treated with IMRT for parotid sparing is adequate. The predominant tumor failure within CTV1 may imply the need to identify patients with radioresistant tumor subvolumes (such as hypoxic regions) within the CTV. This information would assist in discriminating a subgroup of tumors for a more aggressive and target-specific therapeutic approach.     

复发鼻咽癌调强放疗的剂量学探讨

目的：分析和评价复发鼻咽癌调强放疗（IMRT）的剂量学特点。方法：30例局部、区域复发的鼻咽癌患者使用IMRT的再程放疗,其中7例同时伴有颈淋巴结转移。根据1992年福州分期标准进行再分期,I、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期分别为7、7、4、12例。鼻咽大体肿瘤体积（GTV）处方剂量为58．80—78．76Gy,分次剂量2．0—2．92Gy。结果：治疗计划GTV的中位体积为37．46cm。（14．30—227．52cm。）,覆盖鼻咽GTVD。;的平均剂量为62．56Gy,GTVV95的平均体积为98．69％;靶区内GTV、cTV,和CTV,的平均剂量分别为65．82Gy、54．02Gy和50．20Gy;GTV的平均分割剂量为2．28Gy（2．0—2．92Gy）。结论：IMRT能较好覆盖肿瘤靶区而降低邻近敏感器官剂量。     

Disease-control rates following intensity-modulated radiation therapy for small primary oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to achieve favorable disease-control rates while minimizing parotid gland doses in patients treated for small primary tumors of the oropharynx. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively identified all patients who received IMRT as treatment for a small (<4 cm) primary tumor of the oropharynx between October 2000 and June 2002. Tumor characteristics, IMRT parameters, and patient outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients met the criteria for our study. All patients had treatment to gross disease with margin (CTV1), and all but 1 had treatment to the bilateral necks. The most common treatment schedule (39 patients) was a once-daily fractionation of prescribed doses of 63-66 Gy to the CTV1 and 54 Gy to subclinical sites, delivered in 30 fractions. Twenty-one patients (40%) had gastrostomy tubes placed during therapy; in 4 patients, the tube remained in place for more than 6 months after completion of IMRT. The median follow-up was 45 months. The 2-year actuarial locoregional control, recurrence-free, and overall survival rates were 94%, 88%, and 94%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that treatment with IMRT results in favorable locoregional control of small primary oropharynx tumors. IMRT did not appear to have a more favorable acute toxicity profile in this group with respect to the use of a feeding tube; however, the mean dose of radiation delivered to the parotid gland by IMRT was decreased, because 95% of patients had a mean dose of <30 Gy to at least one gland.     

Preliminary results of radiation dose escalation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of dose escalation in tumor for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From September 2000 to June 2004, 50 patients with T3-T4 NPC were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Fourteen patients had Stage III and 36 patients had Stage IVA-IVB disease. The prescribed dose was 76 Gy to gross tumor volume (GTV), 70 Gy to planning target volume (PTV), and 72 Gy to enlarged neck nodes (GTVn). All doses were given in 35 fractions over 7 weeks. Thirty-four patients also had concurrent cisplatin and induction or adjuvant PF (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). RESULTS: The average mean dose achieved in GTV, GTVn, and PTV were 79.5 Gy, 75.3 Gy, and 74.6 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up was 25 months, with 4 recurrences: 2 locoregional and 2 distant failures. All patients with recurrence had IMRT alone without chemotherapy. The 2-year locoregional control rate, distant metastases-free and disease-free survivals were 95.7%, 94.2%, and 93.1%, respectively. One treatment-related death caused by adjuvant chemotherapy occurred. The 2-year overall survival was 92.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation to 76 Gy in tumor is feasible with T3-T4 NPC and can be combined with chemotherapy. Initial results showed good local control and survival.