Evaluation of in vitro methods for testing ceftriaxone against anaerobic bacteria, including quality control guidelines.

Tests with 100 anaerobic bacterial isolates demonstrated comparability between ceftriaxone MICs obtained with the reference agar dilution procedure and those obtained with a broth microdilution susceptibility testing procedure. The aerobically incubated thioglycolate disk elution test was also evaluated. Six 30-micrograms ceftriaxone disks in 5 ml of thioglycolate separated strains for which MICs were less than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml from those for which MICs were greater than or equal to 64 micrograms/ml (6% overall discrepancies). Quality control limits for ceftriaxone agar dilution tests were determined to be as follows: Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285, 32 to 128 micrograms/ml; and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741, 64 to 256 micrograms/ml.     

Quality control criteria for testing the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to meropenem.

Reference values for quality control of in vitro susceptibility tests with meropenem against anaerobic bacteria were determined in a multilaboratory study by the approved National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution method for the four quality control strains. The study protocol also included the evaluation of microdilution testing, medium additives, and multiple lots of media. The recommended MIC control ranges for three of the control organisms are as follows: Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285, 0.06 to 0.125 micrograms/ml; Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741, 0.125 to 0.5 micrograms/ml; and Eubacterium lentum ATCC 43055, 0.125 to 0.5 micrograms/ml. The modal MIC for Clostridium perfringens ATCC 13124 was at or below the lowest concentration of meropenem tested, and no values are recommended.     

Current susceptibility patterns of anaerobic bacteria

While antibiotic resistance among anaerobes continues to increase, the frequency of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for anaerobes is declining. Because anaerobic infections are often mixed and detailed bacteriology of the organisms involved may take some time, physicians must institute empiric therapy before susceptibility testing results are available. Also, economic realities and prudent use of resources mandate that careful consideration be given to the necessity for routine susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Determination of appropriate therapy can be based on published antibiograms; however, since patterns may vary within geographic regions and even within hospitals, it is strongly recommended that each hospital center periodically test their isolates to determine local patterns and detect any pockets of resistance. As a general guide, antibiograms from the last several years of susceptibility testing at the Wadsworth Anaerobe Laboratory are reported.     

Interpretive criteria and quality control parameters for determining bacterial susceptibility to fosfomycin tromethamine

Studies with fosfomycin tromethamine disks containing 200 µg of fosfomycin and 50 µg of glucose-6-phosphate confirmed the following zone diameter criteria for the NCCLS method: 12 mm for resistant (MIC256 µg/ml), 13–15 mm for intermediate (MIC 128 µg/ml) and 16 mm for susceptible (MIC64 µg/ml). Additional studies defined acceptable MIC and zone diameter ranges for the following quality control strains:Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, MIC 0.5 to 4.0 µg/ml, zone diameter 23 to 29 mm;Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, zone diameter 26 to 32 mm;Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27813, MIC 2.0 to 8.0 µg/ml; andEnterococcus faecalis, ATCC 29212, MIC 16 to 64 µg/ml.     

How to isolate,identify and determine antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in routine laboratories

BackgroundThere has been increased interest in the study of anaerobic bacteria that cause human infection during the past decade. Many new genera and species have been described using 16S rRNA gene sequencing of clinical isolates obtained from different infection sites with commercially available special culture media to support the growth of anaerobes. Several systems, such as anaerobic pouches, boxes, jars and chambers provide suitable anaerobic culture conditions to isolate even strict anaerobic bacteria successfully from clinical specimens. Beside the classical, time-consuming identification methods and automated biochemical tests, the use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry has revolutionized identification of even unusual and slow-growing anaerobes directly from culture plates, providing the possibility of providing timely information about anaerobic infections.AimsThe aim of this review article is to present methods for routine laboratories, which carry out anaerobic diagnostics on different levels.SourcesRelevant data from the literature mostly published during the last 7 years are encompassed and discussed.ContentThe review involves topics on the anaerobes that are members of the commensal microbiota and their role causing infection, the key requirements for collection and transport of specimens, processing of specimens in the laboratory, incubation techniques, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Advantages, drawbacks and specific benefits of the methods are highlighted.ImplicationsThe present review aims to update and improve anaerobic microbiology in laboratories with optimal conditions as well as encourage its routine implementation in laboratories with restricted resources.     

Eubacterium lentum ATCC 43055, a new reference strain for quality control of anaerobic susceptibility tests.

A strain of Eubacterium lentum (ATCC 43055) was selected for quality control of anaerobic susceptibility tests. Multilaboratory collaborative studies with 13 different antimicrobial agents were reviewed, and MIC control limits were proposed for agar dilution tests with the new control strain.     

Interpretive criteria and quality control parameters for testing susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to enoxacin, ofloxacin, and temafloxacin.

Haemophilus influenzae isolates were uniformly susceptible to enoxacin, ofloxacin, and temafloxacin. Zone diameter and MIC interpretive criteria were proposed to define susceptible populations so that mutants with diminished susceptibility might be detected when and if they appear in clinical specimens. Additional collaborative quality control studies defined MIC and zone size limits for tests with H. influenzae ATCC 49247.     

Determination of susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to beta-lactam antibiotics by a tablet diffusion test

A standardized tablet diffusion test and a reference agar dilution test was evaluated for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria to beta-lactam antibiotics. 74 freshly isolated anaerobic bacteria and three control strains (Cl. perfringens ATCC 13124 B. fragilis ATCC 25285, B. thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741) were tested. The in vitro activities of 7 beta-lactam antibiotics were compared with metronidazole and clindamycin. Most active were metronidazole and clindamycin. Cefoxitin had the best activity of the beta-lactam antibiotics, whereas piperacillin and carbenicillin had good activities. High resistance rates were found for penicillin, ampicillin, cefuroxime and cefotaxime. MIC on control strains fell well within range set by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS). Correlation between MIC and inhibition zone diameters was generally good. Tablet diffusion can be used to divide anaerobic bacteria into three susceptibility categories. In addition all bacterial strains were tested for production of beta-lactamase by a nitrocefin tube test. Beta-lactamase production by the nitrocefin test indicated reduced sensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics.     

Interpretive criteria and quality control parameters for testing bacterial susceptibility to the fluoroquinolone PD131628.

For testing bacterial susceptibility to PD131628, a 5-micrograms disk and the following tentative interpretive criteria may be used: > or = 19 mm for susceptible (MIC, < or = 1.0 micrograms/ml), 16 to 18 mm for intermediate (MIC, 2.0 micrograms/ml), and < or = 15 mm for resistant (MIC, > or = 4.0 micrograms/ml). For standard quality control strains, the following limits are proposed: for Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, zones of 31 to 41 mm or a MIC of 0.002 to 0.016 micrograms/ml; for Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, zones of 26 to 34 mm or a MIC of 0.12 to 0.5 micrograms/ml; for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, zones of 27 to 33 mm; for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, a MIC of 0.03 to 0.12 micrograms/ml; and for Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, a MIC of 0.12 to 0.5 micrograms/ml.     

Proposed interpretive criteria and quality control parameters for testing susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to beta-lactam-clavulanate combinations.

To support future clinical studies, in vitro susceptibility tests were examined to determine whether Neisseria gonorrhoeae could be tested reliably against two beta-lactam-clavulanate combinations. All isolates that were tested appeared to be susceptible to amoxicillin and ticarcillin in combination with clavulanic acid. In the absence of resistant isolates, only a breakpoint for a susceptible category could be defined for agar dilution tests with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (MIC of less than or equal to 2.0/1.0 micrograms/ml is tentatively proposed). For disk diffusion tests, a corresponding breakpoint zone diameter of greater than or equal to 28 mm is suggested. The validity of the breakpoints for penicillinase-negative penicillin-resistant strains awaits clinical data. Proposed quality control limits for testing amoxicillin-clavulanic acid by agar dilution and disk diffusion methods are a MIC of 0.25/0.125 to 1.0/0.5 micrograms/ml and zones of 30 to 40 mm in diameter for N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226, a MIC of 0.125/0.06 to 0.5/0.25 micrograms/ml for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, and zones of 30 to 38 mm for S. aureus ATCC 25923. Ticarcillin-clavulanate is currently tested against other species by preparing doubling dilutions of ticarcillin with a constant 2 micrograms of clavulanate per ml. By that method, all gonococci were susceptible to low concentrations. However, the amount of clavulanic acid that is included (2 micrograms/ml) will, by itself, inhibit many strains of N. gonorrhoeae. Consequently, the role of ticarcillin in the combination cannot be determined, and such tests are not recommended.     

Evaluation of three broth disk methods for testing the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to imipenem

Imipenem is a member of a new class of highly potent beta-lactam antibiotics, carbapenems, with an antibacterial spectrum that includes nearly all currently known aerobic and anaerobic bacterial species of clinical significance. Although relatively stable in most standard laboratory media used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, imipenem undergoes rapid inactivation in thioglycolate broth, a recommended medium for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria by the broth disk method. In the current study, a panel of 36 anaerobic bacteria consisting of 28 clinical isolates and eight quality control strains was used to determine the suitability and accuracy of the broth disk methods with brain heart infusion, Schaedler, and anaerobic broths, in comparison to the reference agar dilution method, for the anaerobic susceptibility testing of imipenem. To achieve single test concentrations of approximately 8, 16, and 64 micrograms/ml for imipenem, cefoxitin, and piperacillin, respectively, which correspond to the MIC breakpoints of the test drugs, four 10-microgram imipenem disks, three 30-microgram cefoxitin disks, and three 100-microgram piperacillin disks were used in 5 ml of broth. The correlation between the reference agar dilution method and each of the three broth disk elution procedures evaluated was excellent, for imipenem (100% agreement) and somewhat less so for cefoxitin and piperacillin. Therefore, brain heart infusion, Schaedler, and anaerobic broths, but not thioglycolate broth, are suitable for anaerobic susceptibility testing of imipenem by the disk elution method.     

Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.

The susceptibilities of 105 clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria were determined by a new method, the E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), and were compared with the MICs for these organisms obtained by the reference agar dilution method by using supplemented brucella and Wilkins-Chalgren agars. The E test is a plastic strip with a predefined antibiotic gradient immobilized on one side and a MIC interpretive scale printed on the other side. Strips with cefoxitin, cefotaxime, imipenem, penicillin, metronidazole, and clindamycin were used in this study. A suspension of the test strain equal to the visual turbidity of a no. 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared and swabbed onto a 150-mm-diameter plate. The strips were applied in a radial fashion, and the plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions. After growth had occurred, an ellipse of inhibition was seen around each strip. At the point of intersection of the ellipse with the strip, the MIC was read from the interpretive scale. For most antibiotic-organism combinations, the ellipse was clear and the endpoint was sharp. The E-test MICs were interpreted after overnight and 48-h incubation for 58 of the strains. After overnight incubation, 87% of the E-test MICs were within 1 dilution of the agar dilution MICs, and 98% were within 2 dilutions. After 48 h of incubation, agreement was 86 and 97% respectively. E-test MICs obtained for the Bacteroides fragilis group after overnight incubation were more comparable than those obtained after 48 h of incubation to agar dilution MICs determined at 48 h for all drugs except clindamycin. On brucella agar, there was a 2% categorical discrepancy rate between the E-test MICs and agar dilution MICs, which occurred mostly with cefoxitin. The E test is easy to perform and read, is suitable for all anaerobes, can be used to test single patient isolates as needed, and offers the laboratory a reliable method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.     

Comparison of four commercial microdilution systems for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria

The reliability of four commercially available broth microdilution systems (ATB ANA, MHK-Anaerob-Biotest, Dynatech MIC system, Sceptor Anaerobe MIC system) for routine susceptibility testing was evaluated using agar dilution and broth macrodilution as reference methods. Using the categories susceptible, moderately susceptible and resistant, the rate of essential agreement (complete agreement plus minor errors) of all four systems compared to the two reference methods was satisfactory, ranging from 93% (Dynatech system and agar dilution) to 98 % (Sceptor system and agar dilution). The rate of complete agreement compared to the agar dilution and broth dilution method respectively was 61 % and 60 % for the MHK-Anaerob-Biotest, 65 % and 63 % for the Dynatech system, 72 % and 72 % for ATB ANA, and 85 % and 80 % for the Sceptor system. The Sceptor system was thus superior to the other systems. The systems were easy to operate and inoculate, although arrangement of antimicrobial agents in the Dynatech panels was apt to be confusing.     

Proposed interpretive criteria and quality control parameters for testing in vitro susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to ciprofloxacin.

Ciprofloxacin was subjected to a multilaboratory study designed to determine its in vitro susceptibility criteria for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and its quality control parameters for both agar dilution and disk diffusion susceptibility testing for this species. All clinical isolates were susceptible, i.e., MICs were less than or equal to 0.06 microgram/ml and zones of inhibition were greater than or equal to 36 mm. A resistant category could not be defined, but in vitro-selected mutants gave zones of less than or equal to 35 mm, and MICs for these strains were greater than or equal to 0.12 microgram/ml. For quality control of ciprofloxacin agar dilution tests on supplemented GC agar, MICs for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 ranged from 0.12 to 0.5 microgram/ml. For quality control of 5-micrograms ciprofloxacin disk tests, N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226 and S. aureus ATCC 25923 produced acceptable zone diameter ranges of 48 to 58 mm and 22 to 26 mm, respectively.