Tumor markers in neuroendocrine tumors

Most neuroendocrine tumors produce and secrete a multitude of peptide hormones and amines. Some of these substances cause a specific clinical syndrome: carcinoid, Zollinger-Ellison, hyperglycemic, glucagonoma and WDHA syndrome. Specific markers for these syndromes are basal and/or stimulated levels of urinary 5-HIAA, serum or plasma gastrin, insulin, glucagon and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, respectively. Some carcinoid tumors and about one third of endocrine pancreatic tumors do not present any clinical symptoms and are called 'nonfunctioning' tumors. Therefore, general tumor markers such as chromogranin A, pancreatic polypeptide, serum neuron-specific enolase and subunits of glycoprotein hormones have been used for screening purposes in patients without distinct clinical hormone-related symptoms. Among these general tumor markers chromogranin A, although its precise function is not yet established, has been shown to be a very sensitive and specific serum marker for various types of neuroendocrine tumors. This is because it may also be elevated in many cases of less well-differentiated tumors of neuroendocrine origin that do not secrete known hormones. At the moment, chromogranin A is considered the best general neuroendocrine serum or plasma marker available both for diagnosis and therapeutic evaluation and is increased in 50-100% of patients with various neuroendocrine tumors. Chromogranin A serum or plasma levels reflect tumor load, and it may be an independent marker of prognosis in patients with midgut carcinoids.     

The importance of the measurement of circulating markers in patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas and gut

The measurement of general and specific biochemical markers in patients with neuroendocrine tumours assists with diagnosis and gives an indication of the effectiveness of treatment and they may be used as prognostic indicators. There is much agreement that chromogranin A is the most universally helpful marker; it is found to be elevated in the circulation of about 90% of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours and there are several excellent commercially available kits which give reliable estimations. Specific markers are useful for diagnosis also, and are helpful indicators of the effectiveness of treatment, particularly where tumour bulk may not change as much as tumour activity. Sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours may secrete more than one peptide and this indicates a worsening prognosis. Because of the wide variation in the progression of neuroendocrine tumours, a prognostic indicator gives a significant advantage to the clinician in order to facilitate optimum treatment at the optimum stage of disease. Both chromogranin A and neurokinin A have been used as powerful prognostic indicators for midgut carcinoid tumours.     

Endocrine tumours of the pancreas

Endocrine pancreatic tumours (EPTs) are uncommon tumours occurring in approximately 1 in 100,000 of the population, representing 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. Some of the tumours may be part of multiple endocrine neoplasia type one (MEN-1) syndrome or von Hippel-Lindau (vHL) disease. EPTs are classified as functioning or non-functioning tumours on the basis of their clinical manifestation. The biochemical diagnosis of EPT is based on hormones and amines released. Besides specific markers such as insulin, there are also general tumour markers such as chromogranin A, which is the most valuable marker and has been reported to be increased in plasma in 50-80% of patients with EPTs and correlates with tumour burden. The location of endocrine tumours of the pancreas includes different techniques, from endoscopic investigations to scintigraphy (e.g. somatostatin receptor scintigraphy) and positron emission tomography. The medical treatment of endocrine pancreatic tumours consists of chemotherapy, somatostatin analogues and alpha-interferon. None of these can cure a patient with malignant disease. In future, therapy will be custom-made and based on current knowledge of tumour biology and molecular genetics.     

Carcinoid tumours

Carcinoid tumours offer a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Although new biochemical markers and improved methods for tumour detection, including PET and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, have been developed during the last two decades many patients are still diagnosed at late stages of the disease. This is supported by the fact that the age of diagnosis is about the same today as it was 10 years ago. It is our opinion that plasma chromogranin A levels should be be determined in all patients which are investigated because of symptoms that might be connected to a neuroendocrine tumour. In cases with flushing or diarrhoea, U-5-HIAA should also be determined and these two tumour markers are enough to diagnose most patients with midgut carcinoid tumours. In patients with foregut or hindgut tumours other specific hormones should be included. For the localization procedure conventional radiological techniques including CT, MRI and ultrasound investigations should be supplemented with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Endoscopic ultrasound investigations might in the future be relevant for diagnosis of duodenal carcinoids, whereas gastric and rectal carcinoids are diagnosed by endoscopy. A combination of more aggressive surgery combined with medical treatment such as somatostatin analogues and α-interferon has significantly increased the survival rates in patients with classical midgut carcinoid tumours. Metastatic foregut and hindgut tumours are still a therapeutic challenge and it is important in the future to classify all carcinoid tumours based on specific tumour biology patterns. Such a tumour biology based treatment is a prerequisite for a more individually based therapy in the future.     

Biochemistry of neuroendocrine tumours

Several circulating or urinary tumour markers can be used for the diagnosis and follow-up of functioning and clinically non-functioning neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreatic islet cells and intestinal tract. Among the specific tumour markers are serotonin and its metabolites--e.g. 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA)--in carcinoid tumours and the carcinoid syndrome, insulin and its precursors or breakdown products in insulinoma, and gastrin in gastrinoma. Plasma vasointestinal polypeptide (VIP) determinations have been used in the diagnosis of VIPoma, plasma glucagon for glucagonoma, and serum somatostatin for somatostatinoma. Among the tumour-non-specific markers are: chromogranins, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), alpha-subunits of the glycoprotein hormones, catecholamines, pancreatic polypeptide (PP), ghrelin and adrenomedullin.     

The ultimate biochemical diagnosis of endocrine pancreatic tumours in MEN-1

Öberg K, Skogseid B (University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden). The ultimate biochemical diagnosis of endocrine pancreatic tumours in MEN-1 (Minisymposium: MEN & VHL). J Intern Med 1998; 243 : 471–6. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) is a well characterized hereditary syndrome with the occurrence of primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) in combination with pancreatic-duodenal endocrine and anterior pituitary tumours. The diagnosis of MEN-1, the possible probands, necessitates the recognition of at least two or three lesions classically associated with the syndrome whilst only one of them is required for individuals belonging to established MEN-1 kindreds. A distinct feature of MEN-1 comprises the multiplicity of organ involvement, the multicentricity of tumours within the affected organs as well as the complex pattern of the clinical signs of these tumours and their sometimes temporarily variable profile of hormone excess. Thorough screening studies have demonstrated that the MEN-1 trait is biochemically detectable virtually two decades prior to clinically overt disease. The primary biochemical screening programme for MEN-1 includes serum prolactin and insulin growth factor 1 (IGF-1) for pituitary lesions, intact PTH and albumin corrected total serum calcium for the parathyroids and for duodenal/pancreatic tumours serum glucose, insulin, proinsulin, pancreatic polypeptide, glucagon, gastrin and plasma chromogranin A. Furthermore a standardized meal stimulatory test analysing serum polypeptides (PP) and gastrin is recommended. Our current primary screening procedure has yielded about 10% false positives when compared with RFLP data. Pancreatic endocrine tumour diagnosis must be biochemically established since radiology fails to show lesions in half of the patients. Pancreatic involvement in young MEN-1 patients is most consistently demonstrated by analysing serum insulin, proinsulin, PP as well as plasma glucagon chromogranin A levels, which have exhibited sensitivities of 56, 67, 37 and 60%, respectively. Serum PP is a non-specific marker of islet cell tumours that should be applied in conjunction with other peptide markers. Elevation of basal serum gastrin generally indicates the presence of advanced pancreatic tumour involvement or duodenal carcinoids. Early diagnosis of pancreatic endocrine tumours in MEN-1 is enhanced by the use of a standardized meal stimulation test with measurements of serum PP and gastrin response. This test was the most sensitive test and substantiated the presence of tumour in 75% of individuals whose mean age was 25 years. False-positive stimulation due to the meal test has been found in about 10% of previous investigated individuals. The diagnosis of MEN-1 pancreatic tumours is based on biochemical screening alone and it has been substantiated that an unequivocal rise in pancreatic tumour markers precedes radiological detection of these lesions by at least five years.     

A polyclonal antiserum against chromogranin A and B--a new sensitive marker for neuroendocrine tumours

Chromogranins A, B, and C, proteins that are co-stored and co-released with peptides and amines, have been identified in a variety of neuroendocrine tissues, both normal and neoplastic. We examined the secretion of chromogranin A and chromogranin A + B by hormone-producing tumours in patients with endocrine pancreatic tumours, carcinoid tumours, pheochromocytomas, and small cell lung cancer. The radioimmunoassay determining the plasma concentrations of chromogranin A + B showed a greater sensitivity than that determining chromogranin A alone. All patients with endocrine pancreatic tumours, carcinoids, and pheochromocytomas had increased levels of chromogranin A + B, whereas a small number of the patients (5/18 with endocrine pancreatic tumours and 1/3 with pheochromocytomas) had normal levels of chromogranin A. Also in immunocytochemical stainings, our polyclonal antiserum detecting both chromogranin A and B showed a greater sensitivity than other available antisera against chromogranin A, B and C. We have demonstrated that a polyclonal antiserum against a mixture of chromogranin A and B might be a more sensitive marker than chromogranin A alone for diagnosing neuroendocrine tumours. This is not surprising, since both chromogranins are widely distributed in neuroendocrine cells.     

Biochemical markers for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs)

Biochemical markers are applied in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) for diagnostic, prognostic or predictive purposes. Chromogranin A is the most important general marker and it is recommended to be measured in every patient with a suspected NET, whereas Neuron Specific Enolase is elevated mainly in poorly differentiated NETs. Pancreatic Polypeptide is used in the diagnosis of pancreatic non-functioning NETs, whereas Chorionic Gonadotrophin has an adjunctive role. In the case of functioning tumours, specific markers should be sought and monitored during follow up. Endogenous hyperinsulinemia is suggested in the presence of non-suppressible insulin and proinsulin levels during hypoglycemia, whereas high fasting or stimulated gastrin levels along with elevated gastric acid output are diagnostic for the Zollinger–Ellison syndrome. Glucagon, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and somatostatin are markers for glucagonoma, VIP-oma and somatostatinoma syndromes respectively. In case of ectopic paraneoplastic syndrome, the relevant hormone serves as a diagnostic and prognostic marker.     

Neuroendrocine pancreatic tumours: clinical presentation,biochemical and histopathological findings in 84 patients

Abstract. A prospective study has been performed on 84 patients with endocrine pancreatic tumours evaluated at the Medical Department in Uppsala. Available information concerning the patients' presenting symptoms, age at diagnosis, clinical syndrome, tumour location, location of metastases, diagnostic radiology, biochemical and histopathological findings has been analysed. Our results indicate that most patients initially show rather vague and non-specific symptoms, with dyspepsia and pain being the most frequent presenting features. The median delay between appearance of the first symptom and diagnosis was 2 years; the delay was 3 5 months in sporadic cases and 14.5 months in familial cases. In spite of improvements in diagnostic methods, the median age at diagnosis (53 years) has not been reduced, and most patients are encountered when the tumour has reached an advanced stage. There is a need for a method of screening patients with still uncharacteristic abdominalsymptoms for a neuroendocrine tumour. The presence of elevated levels of plasma chromogranin in all patients with a proven tumour suggests that such possibilities exist, and the use of this biochemical marker in the future might reduce the age at diagnosis and thus improve the likelihood of cure and survival of patients with endocrine pancreatic tumours.     

Transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 (ICA512) is expressed in human midgut carcinoids but is not detectable in normal enterochromaffin cells

A potential upregulation of receptor type protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 (ICA512) expression was detected by differential display and investigated in midgut carcinoid tumours. Normal intestine tissue and tumour tissue from 13 midgut carcinoid patients were studied by in situ hybridisation using an IA-2 ribonucleotide probe and confocal microscopy using specific IA-2 antibodies. Previously, it had been shown that IA-2 is located in the secretory granules of virtually all neuroendocrine cells. However, we found that IA-2 was not detectable in resting normal enterochromaffin (EC) cells of the small intestine, while high expression of IA-2 mRNA and protein was confirmed in both primary and metastatic carcinoid tissue. This difference in expression was not observed with chromogranin A or serotonin, two secretory granule hormones known to be expressed in EC cells, indicating that IA-2 was seemingly not necessary for the basal production and packaging of these hormones. When comparing patients receiving biotherapy before operation with untreated patients, we found expression of IA-2 to be lower in tumours from patients that had been treated with a combination of alpha-interferon and the somatostatin analogue, octreotide. There was no correlation between IA-2 expression and proliferation rates as measured by immunohistochemistry with antibodies against the Ki 67 antigen. Furthermore, we show that IA-2 is co-localised with serotonin in carcinoid tumours as well as in the pancreatic tumour cell line, BON1, which is interesting as serotonin secretion rate is presumably higher in tumour cells than in resting EC cells. Taken together, these findings may indicate a role for IA-2 in the later stages of the regulated secretory process.     

Neuroendocrine cells in tumour growth of the prostate

The prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostatic malignancy is controversial, but the results of recent studies with markers such as chromogranin A and neurone-specific enolase suggest that neuroendocrine differentiation, as reflected by increased tissue expression or blood concentrations of these neuroendocrine secretory products, is associated with a poor prognosis, tumour progression, and androgen independence. As all malignant neuroendocrine cells are devoid of androgen receptors and the expression of neuroendocrine cells is not suppressed by androgen ablation, clonal propagation of androgen receptor-negative neuroendocrine cells may have an important role in the development of androgen-independent prostatic carcinoma. This has significant implications for the treatment of prostate cancer, because several of the hormones that are secreted by neuroendocrine differentiated, malignant prostatic cells are potential candidates for use in drug treatment. A limited number of hormones have been tested in this context, in particular somatostatin, bombesin, and serotonin. As there is currently no successful treatment for differentiated prostate cancer, new therapeutic procedures and trials need to be developed to test drugs based on neuroendocrine hormones or their antagonists.     

The biological characterization of neuroendocrine tumors: the role of neuroendocrine markers

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) may originate in different organs, from cells embryologically different but expressing common phenotypic characteristics, such as: the immuno-reactivity for markers of neuroendocrine differentiation (defined as "pan-neuroendocrine"), the capacity to secrete specific or aspecific peptide and hormones and the expression of some receptors, that are at the basis of the current diagnostic and therapeutical approach, peculiar to these tumors. NET have been conventionally distinguished in functioning, when associated with a recognized clinical endocrine syndrome, and non-functioning. However, this terminology may be misleading, since the great majority of NET may secrete neuroendocrine peptides, which can be employed as clinical markers for both diagnosis and follow-up. On the other hand, tissue immuno-reactivity for specific hormones does not always reflect secretory activity of the tumor cells. Finally, receptors and genetic markers are acquiring a relevant role in the characterization of NET, both improving knowledge of biology and physiopathology of NET, as well as in developing specific strategies to establish an early diagnosis and targeted therapies, to adopt prophylactic strategies in familial forms, and to identify more efficacious targets for therapy in the future.     

Biochemical markers in the follow-up of medullary thyroid cancer.

Medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) shares biochemical features with other neuroendocrine tumors but the particular characteristics are largely unexplored. We investigated the biochemical neuroendocrine profile of MTC and whether specific markers could be useful in follow-up. In addition to the standard tumor marker calcitonin, plasma carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), plasma catecholamines, (platelet) serotonin, chromogranin A, tryptase, and urinary markers of catecholamine, histamine, and serotonin metabolism were prospectively determined in 46 patients with histologically proven MTC. Patients were divided according to the stage of disease: group 1, no evidence; group 2, stable disease (SD); and group 3, progressive disease (PD). Plasma dopamine was increased in the majority of the patients with SD and PD; however it did not correlate with extent of disease. Elevated plasma platelet levels of serotonin were only present in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia 2 with SD or PD but did not differ between those groups. Histamine metabolites were elevated in 20% of patients with SD and PD. In addition to plasma calcitonin, only CEA and chromogranin A could differentiate between stable and progressive MTC. MTCs are capable of synthesizing catecholamines, serotonin, and histamine metabolites underscoring that MTCs have metabolic characteristics in common with other neuroendocrine tumors. Thus far, clinical usefulness and relevance seems limited. The most useful markers in the follow-up of MTC are plasma calcitonin and CEA.     

Diagnostic value of plasma chromogranin A in neuroendocrine tumours

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the value of plasma chromogranin A (CgA), a protein produced by neuroendocrine cells, in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours. METHODS: Eighty subjects with neuroendocrine tumours were studied. Thirty-four had carcinoids, 21 nonfunctioning endocrine pancreatic tumours, 17 multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) (six of these also had gastrinomas), and eight had functioning pancreatic tumours (four gastrinomas, two glucagonomas, two somatostatinomas). Twenty-eight healthy subjects were studied as controls. A fasting plasma sample was obtained from each subject, and CgA plasma levels were measured by the ELISA method using a kit (Dako A/S, Denmark). RESULTS: In control subjects, plasma CgA values were below 5 U/l. Among the patients, 20 of the 34 with carcinoid tumours, 12 of the 21 with nonfunctioning pancreatic tumours, nine of the 17 with MEN 1 (including the six with gastrinomas), and the four gastrinomas of the eight functioning pancreatic tumours, i.e. overall, 45 of the 80 patients (56.3%) had abnormally high CgA values (22-961 U/l). Most of the patients with elevated CgA values, except nine of the 10 with gastrinomas, had multiple liver metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the diagnostic value of plasma CgA in neuroendocrine tumours is relatively low; it may be of some interest only in patients with advanced disease and liver metastasis. Gastrinoma seems to be an exception, because in this tumour high CgA values are generally found even in the absence of liver metastasis.     

Pancreatic endocrine tumours

Gastrointestinal endocrine neoplasms are rare tumours that have been classified by the peptides they secrete and the resulting clinical syndromes. The incidence of these tumours is estimated to be less than 1-1.5 cases/100,000 of the general population. These gastrointestinal endocrine cells are characterized by similar cytochemical and ultrastructural characteristics, contain amines and they are capable of uptake of amine precursors to amines or peptides. The function of these cells is the neuroendocrine regulation of normal homeostatic mechanisms including vasomotor tone as well as carbohydrate, calcium and electrolyte metabolism. Each amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation cell normally synthesizes, stores and secretes its single amine or polypeptide and is responsive to its environment for stimulation or suppression in the related clinical syndrome.     

Disparity between tissue and serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen in a patient with medullary thyroid carcinoma

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a neuroendocrine tumor of parafollicular or C-cells of thyroid that comprises 5-10% of all thyroid cancers [1, 2]. The neoplastic cells secrete calcitonin, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and chromogranin A. Typically, increased serum levels of these tumor markers permit them to be used for initial diagnosis and long-term disease status surveillance. This article reports a case of sporadic MTC (pT2N0M0) in a young patient with normal serum tumor markers. A 16-year-old woman presented with MTC without evidence for this to be a familial case due to the absence of germline mutations in the RET proto-oncogene and negative family history. Surprisingly, there were normal preoperative serum levels of calcitonin, CEA, and chromogranin A, despite the immunohistochemistry showing strong and diffuse positive staining for these markers. This disparity between serum levels and tumor expression of calcitonin and CEA in MTC is quite rare. The relevant features of this case are discussed in consideration of the published experiences. This case may represent an unique subgroup of MTC with abnormal secretory capacity that requires reliance upon radiological evaluation for evidence of recurrent or disseminated disease, without the diagnostic benefit of serum tumor markers.     

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumour requiring live donor liver transplantation: case report and concise review

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumours are rare tumours effecting relatively young patients. As metasta- tic neuroendocrine tumours to the liver are much more common, extensive investigations are crucial to exclude a primary tumour elsewhere. We report a case of a 27 year old woman who presented with fati- gue, increased abdominal girth and feeling of early satiety and bloating. Extensive work up failed to show tumour at another primary site. Hepatic artery embolization showed no effect, so the patient underwent total hepatectomy and live-donor liver transplant. Grossly the tumour measured 27 cm. Microscopic exami- nation showed bland, monomorphic cells growing in tubuloglandular and trabecular growth patterns. Cells were positive for neuroendocrine (synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56) and epithelial markers (MOC31, CK7, CK19). Cytoplasmic dense neurosecretory vesicles were seen on ultrastructural examination. Based on the Ki-67 rate, mitotic count, lack of marked nuclear atypia and absence of necrosis, a diagnosis of primary neuroendocrine grade 2 was conferred.     

Neuroendocrine tumours

Neuroendocrine tumours are a heterogeneous group including, for example, carcinoid, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, pituitary tumours, medullary carcinoma of the thyroid and phaeochromocytomas. They have attracted much attention in recent years, both because they are relatively easy to palliate and because they have indicated the chronic effect of the particular hormone elevated. As neuroendocrine phenotypes became better understood, the definition of neuroendocrine cells changed and is now accepted as referring to cells with neurotransmitter, neuromodulator or neuropeptide hormone production, dense-core secretory granules, and the absence of axons and synapses. Neuroendocrine markers, particularly chromogranin A, are invaluable diagnostically. Study of several neuroendocrine tumours has revealed a genetic etiology, and techniques such as genetic screening have allowed risk stratification and prevention of morbidity in patients carrying the particular mutation. Pharmacological therapy for these often slow-growing tumours, e.g. with somatostatin analogues, has dramatically improved symptom control, and radiolabelled somatostatin analogues offer targeted therapy for metastatic or inoperable disease. In this review, the diagnosis and management of patients with carcinoid, gut neuroendocrine tumours, multiple endocrine neoplasia types 1 and 2, and isolated phaeochromocytoma are evaluated.     

Effects of slow-release octreotide on urinary metanephrine excretion and plasma chromogranin A and catecholamine levels in patients with malignant or recurrent phaeochromocytoma

OBJECTIVE: Somatostatin receptors are present on human phaeochromocytomas. Catecholamine concentrations may decrease following short-term administration of somatostatin agonists to patients with phaeochromocytomas. We carried out a prospective study on 10 patients with malignant or recurrent phaeochromocytomas to examine the clinical and hormonal effects of three monthly intramuscular injections of 20 mg slow-release octreotide. DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: Patients underwent somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using 111In-pentetreotide before slow-release octreotide was administered. The patients' symptoms, blood pressure, blood glucose concentrations, glycosylated haemoglobin concentra-tions, plasma insulin and noradrenaline concentrations, and the levels of two putative markers of tumour burden, urinary metanephrine excretion and plasma chromogranin A concentration, were recorded before the first injection and 28 days after the third injection. RESULTS: Slow-release octreotide did not significantly alter symptoms, blood pressure, blood glucose concentrations, plasma catecholamine and chromogranin A concentrations or metanephrine excretion. Median glycosylated haemoglobin concentrations increased from 5.3% to 6.0% (P = 0.03). Patients whose tumours took up 111In- pentetreotide did not differ from those whose tumours did not after slow-release octreotide treatment in terms of symptoms, blood pressure, blood glucose, plasma catecholamine and chromogranin A concentrations or metanephrine excretion. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that slow-release octreotide is of limited value for the long-term treatment of patients with malignant or recurrent benign phaeochromocytomas.     

Chromogranin A Cell Density as a Diagnostic Marker for Lymphocytic Colitis

Background

Lymphocytic colitis (LC) can be mistakenly diagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In a previous study on IBS, some patients showed extremely high colonic chromogranin A cell density. Further examination of these patients showed that they suffered from LC.

Aims

To investigate whether chromogranin A cell density is increased in LC patients and to examine the possibility of using this increase as a marker for the diagnosis of LC.

Methods

Fifty-seven patients diagnosed with LC and 54 controls were included in the study. Biopsies from the right and left colon were obtained from both patients and controls, which were immunostained using the Avidin?Cbiotin-complex method for chromogranin A, and cell density was quantified.

Results

In both the right and left colon of patients with LC, the density of chromogranin A was significantly higher than in controls. This increase in chromogranin A cells occurs whether the number of these cells is expressed as number/mm² epithelium or as number/field. Chromogranin A cell density for the right and left colon expressed as number of cells/mm² epithelium or as cell number/field showed a high sensitivity and specificity as a diagnostic marker for LC.

Conclusions

Chromogranin A is a common marker for endocrine cells, and the present finding suggests that colonic hormones are involved in the pathophysiology of LC. The chromogranin cell density seems to be a good diagnostic marker with high sensitivity and specificity in both the right and left colon, thus sigmoidoscopy can be used in the diagnosis of LC using with this marker.