Preconception subsidized insurance: Prenatal care and birth outcomes by race/ethnicity

Low‐income pregnant women have been Medicaid eligible since the 1980s, but the Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s expansion of Medicaid to women preconception has the potential to improve pregnancy and birth outcomes by removing delays in Medicaid enrollment. More substantially, the ACA expanded subsidized nongroup maternity coverage. Pre‐ACA, nongroup health insurance had generally excluded maternity coverage and was prohibitively expensive for low‐income individuals, but the ACA's creation of the Marketplace made maternity coverage mandatory and provides income‐based subsidies. I use a simulated eligibility approach to measure how these two aspects of the ACA impacted pregnancy and birth outcomes for first‐time mothers, paying special attention to racial‐ethnic differences. I find expanding Medicaid to women prior to pregnancy significantly improves the share of women with a prenatal care visit in the first trimester for non‐Hispanic Whites and Blacks. Expansions in non‐Medicaid subsidized insurance, such as Marketplace insurance, significantly reduce the share of births paid by Medicaid and increased breastfeeding across all racial and ethnic groups. Neither type of subsidized insurance had significant, robust impacts on birth outcomes.     

The impact of the Affordable Care Act on self‐employment

This paper estimates the impact of the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014 on the decision to be self‐employed. Using data from the Current Population Survey, we employ two identification strategies. Utilizing prereform variation in state nongroup health insurance market regulations, we find that the ACA did not increase self‐employment overall in states that lacked similar provisions in their nongroup markets prior to 2014. In specifications that utilize variation across individuals in characteristics that could make it harder for them to purchase insurance if they left their current employer, we also do not find that the ACA differentially increased self‐employment. However, in states that lacked the ACA nongroup market provisions, we do find a statistically significant increase in the second year of implementation (when individuals had more time to adjust behavior and the exchanges functioned properly) among individuals eligible for insurance subsidies, suggesting that a combination of time to adjust, low uncertainty and low insurance costs may be necessary for nongroup health insurance reforms to impact self‐employment.     

Use of Health Insurance Among Clients Seeking Contraceptive Services at Title X–Funded Facilities in 2016

CONTEXT

As federal initiatives aim to fundamentally alter or dismantle the Affordable Care Act (ACA), evidence regarding the use of insurance among clients obtaining contraceptive care at Title X–funded facilities under ACA guidelines is essential to understanding what is at stake.

METHODS

A nationally representative sample of 2,911 clients seeking contraceptive care at 43 Title X–funded sites in 2016 completed a survey assessing their characteristics and insurance coverage and use. Chi‐square tests for independence with adjustments for the sampling design were conducted to determine differences in insurance coverage and use across demographic characteristics and facility types.

RESULTS

Most clients (71%) had some form of public or private health insurance, and most of these (83%) planned to use it to pay for their services. Foreign‐born clients were less likely than U.S.‐born clients to have coverage (46% vs. 75%) and to use it (78% vs. 85%). Clients with private insurance were less likely than those with public insurance to plan to use their insurance (75% vs. 91%). More than one‐quarter of clients not planning to use existing insurance for services indicated that the reason was that someone might find out.

CONCLUSION

Coverage gaps persist among individuals seeking contraceptive care within the Title X network, despite evidence indicating increases in health insurance coverage among this population since implementation of the ACA. Future research should explore the impact of altering or eliminating the ACA both on the Title X provider network and on the individuals who rely on it.     

Did the Affordable Care Act's dependent coverage mandate increase premiums?

We investigate the impact of the Affordable Care Act's dependent coverage mandate on insurance premiums. The expansion of dependent coverage under the ACA allows young adults to remain on their parent's private health insurance plans until the age of 26. We find that the mandate has led to a 2.5–2.8 percent increase in premiums for health insurance plans that cover children, relative to single-coverage plans. We are able to conclude that employers did not pass on the entire premium increase to employees through higher required plan contributions.     

Health Care Reform and Young Adults' Access to Sexual Health Care: An Exploration of Potential Confidentiality Implications of the Affordable Care Act

One provision of the 2010 Affordable Care Act is extension of dependent coverage for young adults aged up to 26 years on their parent’s private insurance plan. This change, meant to increase insurance coverage for young adults, might yield unintended consequences.Confidentiality concerns may be triggered by coverage through parental insurance, particularly regarding sexual health. The existing literature and our original research suggest that actual or perceived limits to confidentiality could influence the decisions of young adults about whether, and where, to seek care for sexual health issues.Further research is needed on the scope and outcomes of these concerns. Possible remedial actions include enhanced policies to protect confidentiality in billing and mechanisms to communicate confidentiality protections to young adults.ON MARCH 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law, effecting the most significant change to the US health care system since the creation of the Medicare and Medicaid programs in 1965.1 All components of the health sector are affected: the legislation includes expansions of public coverage, new subsidies for private coverage, health insurance exchanges, insurance coverage requirements and mandates, and strategies to increase the efficiency of health care delivery and rein in health care costs. Such sweeping reforms bring a host of intended changes and potential unforeseen ramifications. One provision of the ACA expands access to dependent coverage for young adults on their parent’s health insurance up to age 26 years, regardless of marital, employment, or educational status, effective September 2010. Previously, the maximum age varied by state, with eligibility for dependent coverage often linked to factors such as educational enrollment status. The government Web site describes the intended benefits of this provision: “By allowing children to stay on their parent''s plan, the Affordable Care Act makes it easier and more affordable for young adults to get health insurance coverage.”2Young adults aged 19 to 26 years have the highest uninsured rate of any age group in the country; 30% were without coverage in 2009.3 The high rate reflects many contributing factors. Young adults are more likely than other working-aged adults to be unemployed; if working, they are more likely to be newly employed, employed in entry-level jobs, and working in part-time positions without access to employer coverage. Furthermore, most young adults do not meet the traditional categorical eligibility requirements for the Medicaid program—the parent of a child younger than 19 years or an aged or disabled individual—and so young adults, even those with very low incomes, seldom qualify for public coverage. The subsequent low levels of insurance result in limited access to care and high levels of unmet need for care.4By expanding access to health insurance coverage, the ACA addresses two Healthy People 2020 goals5: attaining a higher proportion of individuals with insurance and reducing the proportion of individuals who are unable to obtain or who delay obtaining necessary medical care. This provision of the ACA has already shown significant success in expanding health insurance coverage for young adults. The percentage of young people with health insurance increased by 3.8 points from the first quarter of 2010 to the first quarter of 2011, far outstripping gains in other age groups.6 However, the reliance on expanding dependent coverage to address the high levels of uninsured young adults contains the potential for unintended consequences, because concerns about confidentiality could disrupt access to care.     

Relative reductions in health care utilization among young adults before aging out of extended dependent coverage

The 2010 Affordable Care Act extended dependent coverage for adult children up to age 26 in the USA. Since then, considerable studies have assessed its various impacts among young adults. However, little is known about whether there is any change in health care use when young adults age out of dependent coverage. This study examines health care consumption changes among young adults prior to their aging out process. I used data from a large insurance claim database and studied health care utilization of young adults under parents' coverage during a 2‐year period in a difference‐in‐difference framework. I found that young adults had relative reductions in health services use, except ER visits, compared with individuals who stayed under parents' coverage. This pattern was the same for both male and females. Individuals with regular medical needs had greater relative reductions compared with those without regular medical needs. The relative reductions in health care use during the aging out process may have an important impact on young adults' health, especially for those with regular medical needs. More efforts could be made to help them maintain regular medical utilization during the transition.     

Health insurance and opioid deaths: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act young adult provision

The concurrence of health insurance expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and increasing opioid‐related mortality has led to debate whether insurance increases or decreases opioid deaths. I use the introduction of the ACA young adult (YA) provision as a quasi‐experiment and utilize the resulting policy‐induced variation across states over time in YA access to insurance to study the effect of coverage on opioid‐related mortality. I rely on the share of state populations which stood to gain insurance before the ACA to perform a dose–response analysis, and find that the YA provision reduced opioid‐related mortality. The analysis suggests that 1 percentage point more coverage reduced opioid mortality among YA by 2.5/100,000 or 19.8%.     

Alternatives for expanding health insurance coverage

In March 1990, nearly 14 percent of the U.S. population was without health insurance. This article examines five approaches to increase coverage: tax credits for the purchase of private insurance; changes in the regulation of the private insurance market; additional requirements on employers to provide employment-based insurance; expansion of Medicaid to selected groups; and a universal public health insurance program. Coverage would be most improved under a universal public insurance plan, and least improved by regulatory changes in the private insurance market. Significant but incomplete increases in coverage could be achieved through either new employer mandates or expansion of Medicaid. A tax credit could increase coverage appreciably only if it was substantial relative to the cost of insurance, and even then most of the credits would go to those who would have purchased insurance anyway.     

Impacts of the ACA Medicaid expansion on health behaviors: Evidence from household panel data

A motivation for increasing health insurance coverage is to improve health outcomes for impacted populations. However, health insurance coverage may alternatively increase risky health behaviors due to ex ante moral hazard, and past research on this issue has led to mixed conclusions. This paper uses a panel of household purchases to estimate the effects of the recent state‐level Medicaid expansions resulting from the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on consumption goods that present adverse health risks. We utilize within‐household variation to identify whether increases in Medicaid availability impacted household purchase patterns of alcohol, nicotine‐related, snack food, and carbonated beverage products. Overall, we find little evidence that the ACA Medicaid expansion led to ex ante moral hazard across any of these products, but we find compelling evidence that the Medicaid expansions reduced cigarette consumption and increased smoking cessation product use among the Medicaid‐eligible population.     

Premium subsidies,the mandate,and Medicaid expansion: Coverage effects of the Affordable Care Act

Using premium subsidies for private coverage, an individual mandate, and Medicaid expansion, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has increased insurance coverage. We provide the first comprehensive assessment of these provisions’ effects, using the 2012–2015 American Community Survey and a triple-difference estimation strategy that exploits variation by income, geography, and time. Overall, our model explains 60% of the coverage gains in 2014–2015. We find that coverage was moderately responsive to price subsidies, with larger gains in state-based insurance exchanges than the federal exchange. The individual mandate's exemptions and penalties had little impact on coverage rates. The law increased Medicaid among individuals gaining eligibility under the ACA and among previously-eligible populations (“woodwork effect”) even in non-expansion states, with no resulting reductions in private insurance. Overall, exchange premium subsidies produced 40% of the coverage gains explained by our ACA policy measures, and Medicaid the other 60%, of which 1/2 occurred among previously-eligible individuals.     

Not‐for‐profit hospitals and Affordable Care Act: Navigating the new health care landscape

On a sunny Thursday morning, June 25, 2015, President Obama strode into the Rose Garden and declared a victory for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) by stating that the act was working exactly the way it was supposed to work. He further reinforced that ACA has enabled young Americans up to the age of 26 to remain on their parents’ health plans. It disallows the insurance companies from denying coverage based on preexisting conditions. Above all, an expansion of Medicaid has also brought an additional 16 million Americans under health coverage in a span of less than 2 years. The ACA went into full effect on January 1, 2014, ushering in health insurance reforms and new health coverage options across the country. 1 As the states expand Medicaid and provide new coverage options through the federal health insurance marketplace, they are busy streamlining application and enrollment processes for coverage programs. This article highlights the positive impact of the ACA on uninsured and the challenges that not‐for‐profit and public hospitals are facing as they navigate the new health care landscape.     

Choice of health insurance by families of the mentally ill

This paper investigates whether choice of health insurance is influenced by the perceived mental and physical health of family members among a sample of policy-holders with private health insurance. A multinomial probit model of the choice among major medical coverage only, traditional full coverage, and coverage through a health maintenance organization is estimated. Results indicate that the presence of at least one family member who rates his or her general health as poor does not affect the policy-holder's choice of health insurance. However, the presence of at least one family member considered at risk of mental illness does in some instances affect the policy-holder's choice of health insurance: We observe significant effects for policy-holders who are female, black, have some college education, work for a large firm, and live in an urban area. These findings suggest that adverse selection may arise when individuals are able to choose between health insurance policies with different degrees of coverage for mental health care and that such effects are far more pronounced for those people who consider themselves at risk for mental illness than physical illness.     

The effect of health insurance on crime: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion

Little evidence exists on the effect of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on criminal behavior, a gap in the literature that this paper seeks to address. Using a simple model, we argue we should anticipate a decrease in time devoted to criminal activities in response to the expansion, because the availability of the ACA Medicaid coverage raises the opportunity cost of crime. This prediction is particularly relevant for the ACA expansion because it primarily affects childless adults, a population likely to contain individuals who engage in criminal behavior. We validate this forecast empirically using a difference‐in‐differences framework, estimating the expansion's effects on panel datasets of state‐ and county‐level crime rates. Our estimates suggest that the ACA Medicaid expansion was negatively associated with burglary, vehicle theft, homicide, robbery, and assault. These crime‐reduction spillover effects represent an important offset to the government's cost burden for the ACA Medicaid expansion.     

Insurance coverage and access to care for workers with disabilities, 2001–2017

BackgroundWorkers with disabilities have different options than their peers for obtaining health insurance, and face unique barriers in accessing care. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) led to sweeping changes in the availability and affordability of health insurance in the United States beginning in 2010, and may have had important effects for workers with disabilities.Objective/HypothesisDocument how the ACA changed insurance coverage and access to care for workers with disabilities, and compare those changes to changes among other groups.MethodsWe document health insurance coverage and access to care among workers with disabilities using the 2001–2017 National Health Interview Survey.ResultsThe share of insured workers with disabilities increased from 79.9% in 2009 to 87.8% in 2017. This gain resulted from an 11 percentage point (pp) increase in the share with Medicaid coverage in 2014–2017 compared with 2001–2009 and a 5 pp increase in privately purchased coverage over those periods. These were accompanied by an 11 pp decline in the share with employer-sponsored coverage. Despite coverage gains, cost-related barriers to accessing medical care did not change much after the ACA, for any group. Workers with disabilities experienced an increase in structural access barriers, from 18.4% before the ACA to 24.8% after.ConclusionsThe gain in insurance coverage for workers with disabilities is an important benefit of the ACA, but more investigation and monitoring should be considered to understand whether such coverage will translate into improvements in access to needed health care.     

The spillover effects of health insurance benefit mandates on public insurance coverage: Evidence from veterans

This study examines how regulations in private health insurance markets affect coverage of public insurance. We focus on mental health parity laws, which mandate private health insurance to provide equal coverage for mental and physical health services. The implementation of mental health parity laws may improve a quality dimension of private health insurance but at increased costs. We graphically develop a conceptual framework and then empirically examine whether the regulations shift individuals from private to public insurance. We exploit state-by-year variation in policy implementation in 1999–2008 and focus on a sample of veterans, who have better access to public insurance than non-veterans. Using data from the Current Population Survey, we find that the parity laws reduce employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) coverage by 2.1% points. The drop in ESI is largely offset by enrollment gains in public insurance, namely through the Veterans Affairs (VA) benefit and Medicaid/Medicare programs.     

Regulating self‐selection into private health insurance in Chile and the United States

In the 1980s, Chile adopted a mixed (public and private) model for health insurance coverage similar to the one recently outlined by the Affordable Care Act in the United States (US). In such a system, a mix of public and private health plans offer nearly universal coverage using a combined approach of managed competition and subsidies for low‐income individuals. This paper uses a “most different” case study design to compare policies implemented in Chile and the US to address self‐selection into private insurance. We argue that the implementation of a mixed health insurance system in Chile without the appropriate regulations was complex, and it generated a series of inequities and perverse incentives. The comparison of Chile and the US healthcare reforms examines the different approaches that both countries have used to manage economic competition, address health insurance self‐selection and promote solidarity. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Health insurance reform and retirement: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has provided millions of Americans with medical insurance but may have led to an increase in retirement among older individuals who are utilizing the newly available coverage options as a substitute for employer‐provided insurance. Using data from the American Community Survey from 2009–2016, this hypothesis is tested by estimating the effect of the premium subsidies and Medicaid expansions of the ACA on retirement transitions for the non‐Medicare eligible cohort of older Americans aged 55–64. Research results indicate a 2% and 8% decrease in labor force participation resulting from the premium subsidies and Medicaid expansions, respectively. Slightly larger estimates are found among a subgroup of adult couples. The study also finds suggestive evidence of crowd‐out of employer‐sponsored insurance by subsidized marketplace plans but finds no such effects from the Medicaid expansions.     

Uninsured Veterans Who Will Need to Obtain Insurance Coverage Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Objectives. We examined the number and clinical needs of uninsured veterans, including those who will be eligible for the Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges in 2014.Methods. We analyzed weighted data for 8710 veterans from the 2010 National Survey of Veterans, classifying it by veterans’ age, income, household size, and insurance status.Results. Of 22 million veterans, about 7%, or more than 1.5 million, were uninsured and will need to obtain coverage by enrolling in US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) care or the Medicaid expansion or by participating in the health insurance exchanges. Of those uninsured, 55%, or more than 800 000, are likely eligible for the Medicaid expansion if states implement it. Compared with veterans with any health coverage, those who were uninsured were younger and more likely to be single, Black, and low income and to have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.Conclusions. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is likely to have a considerable impact on uninsured veterans, which may have implications for the VA, the Medicaid expansion, and the health insurance exchanges.The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)1 represents one of the most significant overhauls of the US health care system and is expected to affect millions of uninsured people across the country. Military veterans constitute a particularly important segment of the population because of their service to the country, access to US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care, and other special benefits after their service. However, little has been written on the potential impact of the ACA on the health and health care of veterans.2 Although the VA operates an integrated national health care system that offers free or low-cost services to eligible veterans, many veterans are not enrolled in VA health care, and some are ineligible. Enrollment in VA health care satisfies the ACA’s requirement for insurance coverage, but eligibility for VA health care is determined on the basis of a complex system of priorities, mostly based on service-connected disability, income, and age, and it generally requires a military service discharge that is other than dishonorable (i.e., honorable, general).One study estimated that only 13% (3.6 million) of veterans report receiving some or all of their health care at the VA, and the vast majority (> 20 million) receive no health care from the VA.3 Most veterans thus rely on non-VA health care and are covered by various private or other public forms of health insurance, including Medicare and Medicaid. A small, albeit important, minority of veterans have no health insurance coverage. Estimates based on data from 1987 to 2004 showed that 7.7% of veterans were uninsured (including having no VA coverage), which equates to nearly 1.8 million veterans and represents 4.7% of all uninsured US residents.4Lack of health insurance coverage is an important problem because it can hinder access to effective health care, including needed medical visits, preventive care, and other services, and it can ultimately lead to poor health, premature mortality, and high medical costs.5,6 Being uninsured is a growing problem in the United States that the ACA addresses by requiring virtually all legal US residents to have health insurance. The ACA includes various provisions to help US residents, including veterans, accomplish this.One major provision that is optional for states to implement is the expansion of Medicaid coverage to all individuals aged 18 to 65 years with incomes at or below 138% of the federal poverty level. Although not all states will implement this expansion, and the number of participating states is currently unknown, many poor, uninsured adults will be able to obtain Medicaid coverage in states that implement the Medicaid expansion. Uninsured adults who have incomes above the Medicaid expansion limit or who live in states that do not implement the Medicaid expansion will have to purchase health insurance and may participate in the health insurance exchanges.A second major provision of the ACA is the creation of health insurance exchanges in each state whereby individuals may purchase competitive health insurance plans that are eligible for federal subsidies, but those subsidies are only available to those with income above the federal poverty level. Both of these major ACA provisions are planned for implementation in 2014 and will introduce a variety of coverage options for US residents, including veterans.There has been little study of uninsured veterans and no study of the potential impact of the ACA on veterans in general. Moreover, most data that exist on veterans are based on VA data, which only contain information about veterans who use VA health services and do not include information about those who are uninsured or not covered by VA health care. However, 1 population-based study7 has provided some evidence that a substantial number of veterans are uninsured (particularly those younger than 65 years) and that many uninsured veterans are in poor health, often forego needed health care because of costs, and have equal or worse access to health care than other uninsured adults in the general population. As the country moves toward a new era of health care with the ACA and continues to engage in conflicts in the Middle East, the impact of the ACA on the health care of veterans needs to be considered.We used a recent nationally representative survey of veterans to (1) describe the proportion and characteristics of veterans who are currently uninsured because they will likely be required to obtain coverage under the ACA; (2) determine, among those who are uninsured, who will likely be eligible for the Medicaid expansion; and (3) compare the sociodemographic and health characteristics of those who are uninsured and likely eligible for Medicaid expansion (LEME), those who are uninsured and not LEME, and those who currently have health insurance coverage. The results provide information about the number and health characteristics of veterans who will likely be affected by different provisions of the ACA and inform planning efforts for the VA and states that implement the Medicaid expansion and health insurance exchanges.     

The Obama plan: more regulation, unsustainable spending

The health reform plan put forth by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) focuses on expanding insurance coverage and provides new subsidies to individuals, small businesses, and businesses experiencing catastrophic expenses. It greatly increases the federal regulation of private insurance but does not address the core economic incentives that drive health care spending. This omission along with the very substantial short-term savings claimed raise serious questions about its fiscal sustainability. Heavy regulation coupled with a fallback National Health Plan and a play-or-pay financing choice also raise questions about the future of the employer insurance market.