A 3-year evaluation of skeletal stability of mandibular advancement with rigid fixation

The postsurgical changes associated with mandibular advancements using the sagittal ramus osteotomy and rigid fixation were evaluated. This retrospective study was based on examination of lateral cephalometric radiographs of 19 individuals (16 females and 3 males) with a mean age of 26.6 years. These radiographs were evaluated presurgically, immediately postsurgery, and 3 years postsurgically (2 years, 9 months to 4 years, 5 months). The mean amount of sagittal surgical advancement was 6.7 +/- 2.3 mm, and the mean amount of postsurgical relapse was 1.3 +/- 2.0 mm, representing a 14% relapse of the original surgical advancement. However, individual variation in the amount and direction of movement of the mandible was found during the follow-up period. Postsurgical relapse was found to be related to the amount of surgical advancement. Linear-regression analysis between these two variables resulted in an R2 value of 0.448. Fourteen of the subjects relapsed in the posterior direction, with 2 relapsing more than 50% of the surgical advancement. Five of the subjects moved further anteriorly, with 1 advancing as much as 50% more than the original advancement. The findings of this study suggest that mandibular advancement with the sagittal ramus osteotomy and rigid fixation does not provide consistently stable postsurgical results. However, when compared with previously reported relapse studies using nonrigid fixation techniques, rigid fixation yielded superior results.     

Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback

Postsurgical stability of mandibular setback to correct mandibular prognathism was compared for three approaches: transoral vertical ramus osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid internal fixation via bone screws. In the transoral vertical ramus osteotomy group, the mean postsurgical change in chin position was almost zero, but nearly 50% of the patients did have clinically significant changes in chin position; two thirds of these movements were posterior and one third anterior. In the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy groups, the chin either stayed in its immediately postsurgical position or moved anteriorly. In one fourth of the patients who received maxillomandibular fixation and in nearly half of the patients who received rigid internal fixation, the chin moved forward more than 4 mm.     

双颌手术升支截骨后退术后下颌稳定性及与关节关系的研究

目的　探讨升支矢状劈开截骨术(BSSRO)小钛板坚固内固定与口内入路升支垂直截骨术(BIVRO)下颌后退术后颌稳定性的不同规律,了解导致复发的有关因素特别是髁状突移位在不同手术后复发过程中的意义。方法　升支截骨手术后退下颌的患者共38例,皆为双颌手术,其中下颌BSSRO19例,BIVRO后退术19例。于手术前1周(T1),手术后1周(T2),3个月(T3)及1年(T4)分别拍摄定位头颅侧位片及定位颞下颌关节薛氏位片用于测量下颌移动幅度及关节髁状突的手术后移位。结果　双颌手术下颌升支截骨后退术后,BSSRO坚固内固定组1年时的复发率为25%,而BIVRO组大部分患者1年时下颌发生了与手术目的相同的移动,两组的不稳定主要发生在术后3个月内。结论　手术使髁状突移位术后位置的调整可导致BIVRO术后的下颌继续后移而不稳定,而髁状突近心骨段术中向后旋转术后位置的调整可导致BSSRO术后的下颌骨继续向前而不稳定     

Stability of simultaneous maxillary and mandibular osteotomy for treatment of class III malocclusion: an analysis of three-dimensional cephalograms.

PURPOSE: The current investigation was undertaken to study the three-dimensional (3-D) stability of simultaneous maxillary advancement and mandibular setback using rigid fixation. The study also aimed to analyse the factors involved in postsurgical relapse by evaluation of changes in various parameters. PATIENTS: Twenty-five cases were evaluated of simultaneous Le Fort I maxillary advancement and mandibular setback using rigid fixation. METHODS: Preoperative, immediate and 6-month postoperative skeletal and dental changes were analysed using 3-D cephalograms obtained from biplanar stereoradiography. Maxillary fixation screws were used as landmarks to evaluate postoperative stability. RESULTS: The mean maxillary advancement was 3.7 mm. Relapse in the sagittal, vertical, and transverse planes was not detectable in the maxilla (p > 0.05). However, for an average mandibular setback of 5.7 mm, mean mandibular relapse was 1.1 mm or 19.3% anteriorly (p < 0.05). Surgical or postsurgical skeletal changes in the maxilla had no detectable influence on mandibular relapse (p > 0.05). Vertical alterations of the facial skeleton achieved surgically predicted the mandibular relapse (R2 = 0.27, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Maxillary advancement and vertical changes of +/- 2 mm did not influence the postoperative stability of the mandible. Relapse of the mandible seems to be influenced mainly by the amount and direction of the surgical alteration of mandibular position.     

Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone: a case series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the late postsurgical stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone and no posterior zygomaticomaxillary buttress internal fixation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with maxillary vertical hyperplasia and mandibular retrognathia underwent a 1-piece Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla with superior repositioning and advancement or setback. A bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement was also performed in 22 patients. Stabilization of each maxillary osteotomy was achieved using transosseous stainless steel wires and/or 3-hole titanium miniplates in the piriform aperture region bilaterally, with no zygomaticomaxillary buttress internal fixation. (Twelve of the 60 identified patients were available for a late postoperative radiographic evaluation.) Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken preoperatively (T1), early postoperatively (T2), and late postoperatively (T3) to analyze skeletal movement. RESULTS: These 12 patients (5 male, 7 female) had a mean age of 24.5 years at surgery. Mean time from surgery to T2 was 41.2 days; mean time from surgery to T3 was 14.8 months. One patient received anterior wire osteosynthesis fixation, while 11 patients received both anterior titanium miniplate internal skeletal fixation and anterior wire osteosynthesis fixation. Six patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with genioplasty, 1 patient underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, and 5 patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and genioplasty. These 12 patients all underwent maxillary superior repositioning with either advancement (11 patients) or setback (1 patient). Statistically significant surgical (T2-T1) changes were found in all variables measured. In late postsurgical measurements (T3-T2), all landmarks in the horizontal and vertical plane showed statistically significant skeletal stability. CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that anterior internal fixation alone in cases of 1-piece Le Fort I maxillary superior repositioning with advancement has good late postoperative skeletal stability.     

Cause of early skeletal relapse after mandibular setback

The present study was undertaken to examine the factors that might be responsible for the skeletal relapse occurring during the period of intermaxillary fixation after mandibular setback osteotomy. Fifteen patients, treated for absolute mandibular prognathism by modified sagittal split ramus osteotomy and fixation by skeletal suspension wiring, were evaluated cephalometrically by reference to the degree of postsurgical superior shift of the gonial region of the distal segment as a parameter of relapse since such a shift was evident despite the use of wiring. It was found that the degree of inadvertent anteroposterior rotation of the proximal segment at surgery, rather than the extent and pattern of surgical repositioning of the distal segment, was significantly correlated with the degree of shift. This result emphasizes the justification of preserving the proximal segment in its exact original anatomic site, in addition to the use of skeletal fixation, to ensure predictable stability after mandibular setback osteotomy.     

Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the amount of setback movement and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segments on postoperative stability after orthognathic surgery to correct mandibular prognathism.Thirty-six patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent orthognathic surgery with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy were evaluated. The amount of postoperative relapse was analyzed using a cephalometric analysis.Six months after surgery, the mean backward movement of the mandible at point B was 11.2 mm, the mean intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment was 4.3° and the amount of postoperative relapse at point B was 2.3 mm (20.3%) on average. The tendency of relapse did not significantly increase with the amount of setback but did increase significantly with the intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.This study suggested that postoperative relapse after mandibular setback surgery might be more related to the degree of the intraoperative clockwise movement of the proximal segment, rather than the amount of setback movement. When the amount of mandibular setback is considerable, postoperative relapse might be minimized with adequate control of the intraoperative positioning of the proximal segments.     

Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures were performed in 40 consecutive patients. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy stabilized with wire osteosynthesis for mandibular setback and low-level Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plates and screws for maxillary advancement were performed. Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was in place for 6 weeks. Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately postoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to vertical maxillary movement at surgery: a maxilla-up group with upward movement of the posterior nasal spine of 2 mm or more (group 1, n = 22), and a minimal vertical change group with less than 2 mm of vertical repositioning (group 2, n = 18). The results indicate that surgical correction of Class III malocclusion with combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies appears to be fairly stable. One year postsurgery, maxillary stability was excellent, with a mean horizontal relapse at point A that represented 10.7% of maxillary advancement in group 1 and 13.4% in group 2. In the vertical plane, maxillary stability was also excellent, with a mean of 0.18 mm of superior repositioning at point A for group 1 and 1.19 mm for group 2. The mandible relapsed a mean of 2.97 mm horizontally at pogonion in group 1 (62% of mandibular setback) and 3.41 mm (49.7% of setback) in group 2. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and MMF was not as stable as maxillary advancement and accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse (almost 85%) observed. A trend to relapse was observed for maxillary advancement greater than 6 mm, while the single variable accounting for mandibular relapse in group 1 was the amount of surgical setback. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery was not correlated with mandibular relapse in relation to the type of fixation performed and therefore does not seem to be responsible for relapse.     

Three-dimensional evaluation of positional change of the condyle after mandibular setback by means of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate condylar displacement in 3 dimensions by means of computed tomography after mandibular setback by sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation and to compare these results with those from patients with mandibular advancement. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty Korean subjects with skeletal class III malocclusion who had undergone mandibular setback by sagittal split ramus osteotomy had computed tomographs taken. Tomographs were taken to evaluate the temporomandibular joint 1 month before and approximately 1 month after surgery. The position and angulation of the condyle were measured on axial or sagittal views. These measurements were analyzed to determine any correlations between the amount of mandibular movement and condylar displacement. RESULTS: The results of this study show that the condyle tends to move inferiorly and rotate inward on the axial view and backward on the sagittal view by a statistically significant amount. CONCLUSION: The positional change of the condyle after sagittal split ramus osteotomy was not correlated with the amount of the setback.     

Postoperative stability following bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy based on amount of setback

Our aim was to evaluate the postoperative stability associated with differing degrees of mandibular setback and their relations after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). We planned a retrospective cohort study of 94 patients (mean age (range) 23 (18–46) years) selected from a larger group who had been diagnosed with mandibular prognathism with or without facial asymmetry and who had mandibular setback by IVR osteotomy from 2004 to 2009. The preoperative, 7-day, and 12-month postoperative lateral cephalographs were measured to find out the degree of movement, and the vertical and horizontal positions of menton and pogonion were compared at different time points to measure stability. The mean (SD) setback was 10.5 (5.1) mm, with 0.8 (1.1) posterior relapse at 12 months. The mean surgical change of menton vertically was 3.0 (3.0) mm superiorly, with an additional 1.3 (1.05) mm at 12 months. The amount of posterior relapse was less as the amount of setback increased but not significantly so. The amount of setback therefore has minimal effects on anterior relapse, and cannot be considered singly as a variant that affects the degree of stability. The risk of anterior relapse is low even with a substantial degree of mandibular setback, so overcorrection is not necessary with the IVR osteotomy.     

Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal stability after double-jaw surgery for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion to assess whether there were any differences between wire and rigid fixation of the mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven Class III patients had Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plate and screws for maxillary advancement. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback was stabilized with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation for 6 weeks in 20 patients (group 1) and with rigid internal fixation in 17 patients (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately after surgery, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. One year after surgery, maxillary sagittal stability was excellent in both groups, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse observed. In group 1, significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse at the posterior maxilla and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. In group 2, significant correlations were found between mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the ramus and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. No significant differences in postoperative skeletal and dental stability between groups were observed except for maxillary posterior vertical position. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures appears to be a fairly stable procedure independent of the type of fixation used to stabilize the mandible.     

Effect of mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on transverse displacement of the proximal segment.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a correlation exists between: a) transverse changes in the proximal segments because of mandibular setback surgery and b) postsurgical horizontal relapse of the mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy setback with rigid fixation and Le Fort I osteotomy performed by 1 surgeon between 1986 and 2000. The radiographic material for this study consisted of posteroanterior and lateral cephalometric radiographs for each patient taken preoperatively (T1), early postoperatively (T2), and late postoperatively (T3). Twenty-four of the 42 identified patients had T1, T2, and T3 radiographs, while the remainder of the patients had only T1 and T2 radiographs available. The posteroanterior radiographs were used to evaluate the angulation of the proximal segment and the intergonial width. RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in intergonial width and proximal segment angulation occurred from T1 to T2. In fact, all 42 patients had an increased intergonial width from T1 and T2. From T2 to T3, most patients underwent some relapse in their transverse dimension changes (21 of 24 patients had a decrease in their intergonial width). Overall, the intergonial width and the proximal segment angulations were significantly increased from T1 to T3. However, there was no significant correlation between the amount of transverse displacement of the proximal segment and horizontal postsurgical relapse of the mandible. CONCLUSION: The results show that statistically significant changes in the transverse width and angulation between proximal segments occur in patients undergoing bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback with rigid fixation. However, the magnitude of the changes was small, and it is still uncertain as to whether these changes are of any clinical significance.     

Mandibular setback by sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a 12-year follow-up

Short- and long-term skeletal changes after mandibular setback were analyzed using bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Twelve patients who had undergone mandibular setback surgery between 1986 and 1990 were available for long-term cephalography on average 12 years after primary surgery. The mean amount of surgical setback had been 6.4 mm. After the first postoperative year, there was skeletal relapse of 1 mm at the B-point and pogonion (Pg), amounting to 14% of the initial skeletal setback. In contrast to condylar displacement and proximal segment rotation, osteotomy slippage was associated with positional changes at the B-point and Pg. From 1 to 12 years postoperatively, the B-point and Pg remained stable. Mandibular ramus and corpus length decreased 2.1 mm and 1.3 mm, respectively, indicating remodeling at the osteotomy sites and probably condylar resorption.     

Facilitating ramus lengthening following mandibular-dependent surgical closing of a skeletal open bite with short ramus: A new modified technique

Recent studies have shown that a sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with counterclockwise rotation of the mandible using rigid fixation is relatively a stable procedure when used to correct a mild skeletal anterior open bite in cases where a maxillary osteotomy is not indicated to improve or enhance facial aesthetics. When an open bite accompanies a short ramus, the closing rotation will result is a large amount of ramus lengthening and downward movement that stretches the major muscle-ligament structures attached to the ramus, with a risk of relapse. In order to overcome this problem we have adopted a modified surgical technique in which a considerable amount of ramus lengthening following mandibular rotating can be achieved. In this paper, the technique will be introduced and illustrated. Advantages and disadvantages will be also discussed.     

Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of morphologic airway changes after mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism

OBJECTIVE: To observe changes in the pharyngeal airway and the hyoid bone position after mandibular setback osteotomy in 30 patients with mandibular prognathism by means of 3-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT). STUDY DESIGN: Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed on 17 patients treated by sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid osteosynthesis and on 13 patients treated by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy without osteosynthesis. The amount of mandibular setback was measured by the preoperative to postoperative difference of the mandibular position in axial CT images. The sizes of the preoperative and postoperative pharyngeal airway were evaluated from semitransparent and crosscut 3DCT images. Postoperative displacement of the hyoid bone was evaluated by a technique to superimpose a postoperative hard tissue 3DCT image on the preoperative image. The helical scan technique was used in the CT examination. The volume rendering technique was used to create 3DCT images. RESULTS: The mean mandibular setback was 7.8 +/- 2.1 mm with a range of 5 to 11 mm. Three months after surgery, the lateral and frontal widths of the pharyngeal airway had decreased significantly in comparison with the preoperative width. The mean reduction rates of the lateral and frontal width were 23.6% and 11.4%, respectively. The diminished airway did not recover by either 6 months or 1 year after surgery in most cases. Downward and posterior displacement of the hyoid bone was seen postoperatively. There were positive correlations between the amount of mandibular setback and reduction of the lateral width of the pharyngeal airway (r = 0.54) and the amount of hyoid bone displacement (r = 0.42). There were no significant differences between the two surgical techniques. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional computed tomography was a practical imaging technique to evaluate the morphologic airway changes. The pharyngeal airway may have irreversible narrowing after mandibular setback surgery.     

Stability of extraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: plate fixation versus maxillomandibular/skeletal suspension wire fixation

The objective of this cephalometric study was to evaluate skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes in 2 groups of mandibular prognathism patients following extraoral oblique vertical ramus osteotomy (VRO). One group (n = 22) received maxillomandibular fixation and skeletal suspension wires (MMF group) for a period of 8 weeks. In the other group (n = 22), the segments were rigidly fixed with plates and the patients were allowed to function immediately after surgery. Lateral cephalograms were taken on 5 occasions: immediately presurgical, immediately postsurgical, 8 weeks postsurgical, 6 months postsurgical, and 1 year postsurgical. During the first 8 weeks after surgery, the MMF group demonstrated posterior movement of the mandible, with an increase in mandibular plane angle, shortening of the rami, and dental compensations. Upon release of MMF and skeletal suspension wiring, a small anterior relapse tendency was observed, but the net setback 1 year after surgery was still greater than the actual surgical setback. In the plate fixation group, postoperative changes were mainly in the form of a small anterior relapse tendency in the range of 10% of the surgical setback. The results indicate that the use of plate fixation with VRO, while eliminating the inconvenience for the patient of several weeks of MMF and preventing the early side effects observed in the MMF group, also resulted in a more predictable surgical procedure, with excellent stability 1 year after surgery.     

Stability after rigid fixation of simultaneous maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement osteotomies

The purpose of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term stability of bimaxillary surgery following LeFort I (LF-1) impaction with simultaneous bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) and mandibular advancement using the technique of rigid internal fixation (RIF). In order to assess the postoperative maxillary and mandibular movement pattern in 26 patients with vertical maxillary excess and mandibular deficiency, cephalograms were taken immediately preoperatively, and 1 week, 2 months, and 1 year after surgery. With paired t-test showing no statistically significant postoperative change for the point A of the maxilla from immediate postsurgery to longest follow-up (P> 0.05), the used technique of "RIF LF-I impaction and RIF BSSO advancement" tended to render excellent postsurgical stability in the horizontal (0.1+/-0.8mm mean posterior movement) and vertical (0.1+/-0.5mm mean inferior movement) direction. There was no instance of maxillary relapse of >2mm. Regarding mandibular BSSO advancement, the point B showed a significant vertical upward movement (1.6+/-1.2mm) (P< 0.001) and a slight horizontal forward movement (0.3+/-2.0mm) (P> 0.05) at 1-year follow-up. The incidence of posterior relapse of >2mm accounted for 11.5%. The data confirm the concept that the bimaxillary approach of "LF-I impaction and BSSO advancement" using the described technique of RIF is a stable procedure in the treatment of open bite patients classified as vertical maxillary excess in combination with mandibular deficiency.     

Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery: a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients

The objective of this cephalometric study was to evaluate skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes in 80 consecutive mandibular prognathism patients operated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and rigid fixation. Lateral cephalograms were taken on 6 occasions: immediately preoperative, immediately postoperative, 2 and 6 months postoperative, and 1 and 3 years postoperative. The results indicate that BSSO with rigid fixation for mandibular setback is a fairly stable clinical procedure. Three years after surgery, mean relapse at pogonion represented 26% of the surgical setback (19% at point B). Most of the relapse (72%) took place during the first 6 months after surgery. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery with lengthening of the elevator muscles, though evident in this study and apparently responsible for the early horizontal postoperative changes, does not seem to be associated with marked relapse. Changes occurring in some of the younger patients between 1 and 3 years postoperatively are likely to be manifestations of late mandibular growth.     

Evaluation of soft tissue profile following intraoral ramus osteotomy in Chinese adults with mandibular prognathism

Twenty-five Chinese adults with mandibular prognathism were treated with either the intraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy or the bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The patients were kept in maxillomandibular fixation for 6 to 8 weeks while osteosynthesis was achieved with the use of intraosseous wiring. Serial lateral cephalograms were taken presurgery and between 12 and 26 months postsurgery, and specific soft and hard tissue points were digitized on a computer. The mean mandibular setback postsurgically was 8.4 +/- 3.2 mm, with a 5.2-degree reduction in point A-nasion-point B angle. Posterior movement of pogonion, point B and the mandibular incisal edge was accompanied by posterior movement of 95% at soft tissue pogonion (r = .96), 89% at soft tissue point B (r = .83), and 67% at labrale inferius (r = .81), respectively. The correlation between changes in the labrale superius and mandibular setback appeared to be dependent on both the amount of mandibular setback and the degree of mandibular rotation during the setback surgery. The presently reported ratios of the soft tissue response to hard tissue movement vary from those reported in white patients by other researchers, which confirms the need for different ratios for different racial types.     

Stability of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: rigid fixation versus transosseous wiring.

Although many improvements have been made in orthodontic surgical procedures for mandibular retrognathism, relapse continues to occur. This study was designed to compare the stability of rigid and nonrigid fixation between 2 groups of patients who had undergone mandibular advancement surgery via sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Retrospective cephalometric measurements were made on 54 randomly selected orthognathic surgical patients. The patients, 7 males and 47 females, were divided into 2 groups: 28 patients stabilized by means of rigid fixation and 26 patients fixated with interosseous wires. The age of the patients ranged from 15.3 to 49.7 years. Lateral cephalograms were used to evaluate each patient at 3 distinct intervals: 7.0 +/- 2.0 days before surgery (T1), 34.4 +/- 15.0 days postsurgery (T2), and 458 +/- 202 days after sagittal split osteotomy (T3). Eighteen linear and angular measurements were recorded and differences between the 3 time periods were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences in the 2 fixation types between and within each group at different time intervals. The following measurements showed statistically significant skeletal relapse over time, for the P value.0028: Co-Go, ANS-Xi-Pm, IMPA, overbite, and overjet. The remaining variables showed no statistically significant relapse. The only measurement that showed a statistically significant group difference between T1 and T2 was DC-Xi-Pm. Results of the study led to the following conclusions: there was statistically significant relapse in mandibular length, lower anterior face height, mandibular arc, lower incisor inclination, overbite, and overjet in each group, regardless of the type of fixation. The potential was greater for relapse in patients stabilized with transosseous wiring. Although multifactorial, relapse in overbite and overjet may be a combination of skeletal and dental changes. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:397-403).