全子宫与次全子宫切除术治疗子宫肌瘤对女性卵巢功能的影响

目的:对比全子宫与次全子宫切除术治疗子宫肌瘤对女性卵巢功能的影响。方法:选择2011年9月到2015年2月在我院诊治的子宫肌瘤患者146例,根据随机数字表法分为治疗组73例与对照组73例,对照组给予经腹全子宫切除术,治疗组给予经腹次全子宫切除术。结果:治疗组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后肛门排气时间与术后住院时间明显少于对照组(P0.05)。治疗组术后1个月恶心、呕吐、皮下气肿、下肢静脉血栓、阴道感染等并发症明显少于对照组(P0.05)。治疗组与对照组术后1个月窦卵泡计数分别为8.89±1.03个和6.19±1.33个,都明显低于术前11.39±2.98个和11.33±2.10个(P0.05),但两组术后1个月比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组术后1个月的血清雌二醇(E2)值明显低于术前(P0.05),而血清卵泡刺激素(FSH)值明显高于术前(P0.05),但组间比较差异都无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:子宫切除术对卵巢功能均有一定的负面影响,但次全子宫切除术对AFC的影响更小,减少术后并发症的发生,有较好的应用价值。     

85例子宫切除术后排尿、排便和性功能的研究

目的:评价子宫切除术后患者的排尿、排便和性功能问题.方法:对85例因妇科良性疾病而行子宫切除术的患者进行前瞻性研究.根据术式不同分为经腹子宫切除术(TAH)45例和经阴道子宫切除术(TVH)40例两组,术前及术后3、6、12个月进行调查问卷,观察泌尿道、肠道功能和性功能的变化.结果:子宫切除术后3月,患者便秘、性交中阴道干涩、阴道短或狭窄、性交痛以及对性生活不满意与术前相比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);随访至术后12月,尿急、尿失禁、近期无性生活与术前相比,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);术后TAH组与TVH组的近期无性生活、少或无性交、性交无高潮比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论:从长远来看,子宫切除术可以改善患者术后生活质量,对泌尿道、肠道功能和性功能无负面影响.     

子宫切除术的术式选择

子宫切除术（hysterectomy）是妇科手术中的一个基本手术。据统计，我国2003年的子宫切除手术为2817353例次。传统的子宫切除手术入路有经腹和经阴道两种。近些年来随着腹腔镜技术的不断提高和手术器械的不断完善，出现了腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术，腹腔镜子宫全切除术．腹腔镜子宫次全切除术，筋膜内子宫切除术等术式，     

腹腔镜全子宫切除术式探讨

为探讨腹腔镜鞘膜内全子宫切除术（ＣＡＳＨ）与腹腔镜协助阴式全子宫切除术（ＬＡＶＨ）的临床应用价值,本文对我院所做的ＣＡＳＨ和ＬＡＶＨ两组共６４例病例进行回顾性比较分析,现报道如下。１材料与方法１１一般资料我科１９９８年２月～４月进行全子宫切除术７９...     

不同途径全子宫切除术对女性性生活质量的影响

目的:了解不同途径全子宫切除术对女性性生活质量的影响。方法:选取因妇科良性疾病行全子宫切除术的具有完整资料的89例患者,根据手术途径不同分组:经腹全子宫切除术(52例)、阴式全子宫切除术(19例)及腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术(18例)。随访内容包括:焦虑评估、一般资料采集、术前性生活评估、手术方式分析、术后随访和性生活评估。结果:3组患者的术前性生活质量评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);术后性生活质量评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。LAVH组患者术后的性生活质量最好,术后SAS焦虑状况评分最低。结论:LAVH对性生活质量无明显影响,是优先考虑的手术途径。     

高位子宫次全切除术112例体会

经腹子宫次全切除术（次切术）是妇科最常施行的手术,我们在传统的术式基础上作了改进,对１１２例患者行高位子宫次切术,通过实践与效果观察,证实此术式易行,损伤小,且能保留宫颈及完整的峡部组织,为一种维持生理、心理平衡,效果好的手术方法。１　资料与方法１－１　临床资料自１９９５年８月～１９９８年８月在我院住院病例中选择１１２例子宫良性病变患者行高位子宫次切术（研究组）,其中子宫肌瘤１０１例,腺肌病３例,久治不愈功能失调性子宫出血４例,合并子宫内膜息肉２例,子宫肥大症２例。年龄最小３２岁,最大４５岁,平…     

改良腹式全子宫切除术:三步全子宫切除

改良腹式全子宫切除术：三步全子宫切除张桂萍（广东省韶关市妇幼保健院）腹式全子宫切除术是妇科常用的手术之一，但传统术式较繁琐，盆腔粘连及盆腔较深的患者更易造成手术困难及损伤邻近器官，致使手术时间较长和出血较多。为提高手术质量，从１９９４年６月至１９９６...     

筋膜内全子宫切除术术式探讨

目前需行子宫切除术的子宫良性病变，其术式仍以经腹为主。常见的经典式全子宫切除术使盆底结构变化大，阴道短缩，且常并发膀胱、直肠脱出，影响患者的生活质量。子宫次全切除术又留下宫颈再发生病变的后患。而筋膜内子宫全切术既能达到切除子宫的目的，又能兼有一些次全切之优点。现将筋膜内子宫全切术做一介绍。     

子宫及卵巢切除术对女性性功能影响

子宫及卵巢切除术对女性性功能可能产生一定影响。综述不同术式及不同途径子宫切除术及卵巢切除术对女性性功能的影响。研究发现选择何种术式或何种途径的子宫切除不是影响性行为重要因素。但经阴道和经腹腔镜手术能更早恢复性生活，保留宫颈的腹腔镜子宫切除术对性功能的恢复相对好。综述发现卵巢切除术后在雌激素替代基础上给予一定量的睾酮对提高性功能有一定益处。     

子宫次全切除术后3年输卵管妊娠1例

患者，女，27岁，因“腹痛12h，晕厥2次”于2003年5月26日下午6点30分入院。患者于2000年5月15日行剖宫产分娩，术中子宫收缩乏力并发大出血急诊行子宫次全切除术。术后无月经来潮。于2003年5月26日晨无诱因突然下腹疼痛，伴肛门坠胀感，疼痛呈持续性无缓解，上午10时昏厥1次，到当地县医院就诊。查尿HCG示阳性，B超提示：(1)盆腔内右侧实质性占位性病变；(2)腹腔内中等量积液，考虑“宫外孕”。当日下午4时再次昏厥一次，于下午6时30分转入院，以“异位妊娠?失血性休克”收住院。既往史：无特殊病史，无药物过敏史，月经史：13(4-5)／(28-30)，绝经3年。     

The Power Law of Learning in Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Subtotal Hysterectomy

Study Objective

To analyze the surgical outcomes and learning curve of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy, which requires sutures of the cervical stump.

Why Do Women Choose Endometrial Ablation Rather Than Hysterectomy?

Objective: To determine why women choose endometrial ablation rather than hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia.

Design: Observational study based on postal questionnaires.

Setting: A university hospital.

Patient(s): One hundred eighty randomly selected patients from a cohort of 658 patients who underwent endometrial ablation for the treatment of menorrhagia during the past 7 years.

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Patient attitude about endometrial ablation.

Result(s): One hundred six questionnaires (58.9%) were completed satisfactorily. The average postoperative follow-up period was 45.1 months (range, 3–80 months). Eleven women (10.4%) had undergone repeated endometrial ablation and 8 (7.5%) had undergone hysterectomy. More than half the women indicated that they would find endometrial ablation acceptable even if there was no chance of amenorrhea, if the probability of menstruation becoming lighter was ≥4:10, if the likelihood of menstrual pain decreasing was ≥3:10, if the chance of requiring repeated endometrial ablation or hysterectomy was ≤1:4, and if the risk of uterine cancer after surgery was ≤1:200. The three most important advantages of endometrial ablation over hysterectomy were perceived to be the avoidance of major surgery, the fast return to normal functioning, and the short hospitalization.

Conclusion(s): Most women who choose endometrial ablation rather than hysterectomy as therapy for menorrhagia are prepared to undergo hysteroscopic surgery even if the chance of success is relatively poor.     

阴道高位次全子宫切除术的探讨

目的 :探讨经阴道高位次全子宫切除术的临床实用价值。方法 :对 45例患者行经阴道次全子宫切除术 ,均在子宫峡部上方 1～ 2cm处向下楔行切除宫体。并选择 2 0例经腹次全子宫切除术病例作为对照 ,比较两组手术各项指标。结果 :平均术中出血量 ,平均手术时间两组比较差异无显著性P >0 .0 5 ;肠功能恢复时间研究组较对照组快 (9.2小时vs 30小时 ,P <0 .0 1) ;研究组术后平均住院 4天较对照组短 (8天 ) (P <0 .0 1) ;术后病率研究组 8%,对照组 15 %(P<0 .0 1)。结论 :经阴道高位次全子宫切除术是一种安全、微创的手术 ,有助于改善手术患者的生活质量。     

腹腔镜与开腹次全子宫切除术比较研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜次全子宫切除与开腹次全子宫切除的优缺点。方法:80例因子宫肌瘤等需次全子宫切除的患者,根据患者意愿,分为腹腔镜组和开腹组,每组40例,分析2种手术的手术时间、出血量、术后病率、肠功能恢复、平均住院天数等情况。结果:腹腔镜组平均手术时间为45.5±10.6min,明显短于开腹组(51.64±10.2min),P<0.05;腹腔镜组平均出血量为95.7±20.2ml,明显少于开腹组(123.3±27.7ml),P<0.01;腹腔镜组术后病率为7.5%(3/40),明显少于开腹组的25.0%(10/40);腹腔镜组术后平均排气时间为21.5±2.2h,明显少于开腹组(28.9±4.7h),P<0.05;腹腔镜组术后平均住院时间为4.2±1.5d,明显少于开腹组(6.6±0.5d),P<0.01。术后6个月随访时,除开腹组有2例伤口愈合不良外,其余无并发症。结论:腹腔镜次全子宫切除较开腹的优势更趋明显,如果腹腔镜操作技巧熟练,在腹腔镜下进行次全子宫切除是一种理想的术式。     

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post Hysterectomy Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The objective of this study was to address the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks in pain management among women who undergo elective hysterectomy for benign pathology in both open and minimally invasive surgeries. We performed a systematic review by searching for bibliographic citations from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. MeSH headings for TAP blocks and hysterectomy were combined and restricted to the English language. We included randomized controlled trials comparing TAP blocks with placebo or no block in patients who underwent elective hysterectomy. Pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 to 100. We calculated pooled mean differences in VAS and total morphine consumption at 2 and 24 hours by performing a random effects meta-analysis. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 855 participants. At 2 hours mean VAS scores for patients who underwent TAP blocks were significantly lower after both total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) (mean difference, ?14.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], ?20.35 to ?9.59) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH; mean difference, ?18.16; 95% CI, ?34.78 to ?1.53) compared with placebo or no block. Pain scores at 24 hours for patients who underwent TAP blocks were significantly lower after both TAH (?10.09; 95% CI, ?17.35 to ?2.83) and TLH (?9.12; 95% CI, ?18.12 to ?.13) compared with placebo or no block. Mean difference in morphine consumption was ?9.53?mg (95% CI, ?15.43 to ?3.63) for TAH and ?3.15?mg (95% CI, ?8.41 to 2.12) for TLH. In conclusion, TAP blocks provide significant postoperative early and delayed pain control compared with placebo or no block among women who undergo hysterectomy. There was reduced morphine consumption among patients who underwent TAH but not TLH. (Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ID: CRD42016036791.)