Histological pancreatic findings correlate with computed tomography attenuation and predict postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundAlthough a soft pancreas is a widely-accepted reliable risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), there is no established preoperative evaluation of pancreatic texture.MethodsTwo hundred thirty-seven patients who underwent PD with histological pancreatic assessment were retrospectively enrolled. The degree of fibrosis and fatty infiltration was scored histologically as seven grades and five grades, respectively. Computed tomography (CT) attenuation of the pancreas was measured on preoperative unenhanced CT images. Correlations between the CT attenuation of the pancreas and the histological pancreatic findings, and the development of POPF were analyzed.ResultsThe fibrosis grade was significantly higher for hard pancreas than for soft pancreas (p < 0.001), whereas the fatty infiltration grade was similar between the two types (p = 0.161). CT attenuation of the pancreas was inversely correlated with both fibrosis grade (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ([r] = ?0.609, p < 0.001) and fatty infiltration grade (r = ?0.382, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that body mass index ≥25 kg/m² (odds ratio [OR]: 5.64, p < 0.001) and fibrosis grade ≤2 (OR: 18.0, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for clinically significant POPF.ConclusionHistological pancreatic texture can be evaluated with CT attenuation and might be helpful in preoperatively predicting the development of POPF after PD.     

Intraoperative amylase level of pancreatic juice as a simple predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

IntroductionA soft remnant texture of the pancreas is commonly accepted as a risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, its assessment is subjective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of intraoperative amylase level of the pancreatic juice as a risk factor of POPF after PD.MethodThis study included 75 patients who underwent PD between November 2014 and April 2020 at Jikei University Hospital. We investigated the relationship between pancreatic texture, intraoperative amylase level of pancreatic juice, results of the pathological evaluations, and the incidence of POPF.ResultsTwenty-three patients (31%) developed POPF. The significant predictors of POPF were non-ductal adenocarcinoma (p < 0.01), soft pancreatic remnant (p < 0.01), high intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.01), high intraoperative amylase level of pancreatic juice (p < 0.01), and low pancreatic fibrosis (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the significant independent predictors of POPF were high intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.01) and high intraoperative amylase level of pancreatic juice (p = 0.02). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the cut-off value for the intraoperative amylase level of pancreatic juice was 2.17 × 10⁵ IU/L (area under the curve = 0.726, sensitivity = 95.7%, and specificity = 50.0%)ConclusionsThe intraoperative amylase level of pancreatic juice is a reliable objective predictor for POPF after PD.     

Preoperative fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) adds value in predicting post-operative pancreatic fistula: not all soft pancreas share the same risk – A prospective analysis on 105 patients

BackgroundScores predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) mainly use intraoperative predictors. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of pancreatic exocrine function expressed by fecal elastase (FE-1) as preoperative predictor of POPF.MethodsPatients scheduled for PD at the Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital, from April 2017 to July 2018 were prospectively enrolled. FE-1 was measured in a preoperative stool sample through an ELISA test.ResultsThe study population consisted of 105 patients. The POPF rate was 17.1%. Patients developing POPF showed high values of FE-1 (454 vs 155 mcg/g; p < 0.01), and FE-1 was an independent predictor of POPF (OR 1.008, CI 95% 1.003–1.014; p < 0.01), even considering only patients with a “soft” texture. A cut-off value of 260 mcg/g presented 100% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity (AUC 0.83) in predicting POPF. Approximately 30% of patients with a “soft” pancreatic texture presented with FE-1 < 260 mcg/g and did not develop POPF.ConclusionFE-1 is a promising tool to preoperatively assess the risk of POPF after PD. Further studies with larger populations are needed to potentially incorporate FE-1 into risk scores for PD with better stratification.     

The impact of intra- and postoperative fluid balance in pancreatic surgery - A retrospective cohort study

Background/objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative fluid administration in pancreatic surgery.MethodsPatients who underwent pancreatic resections were identified from our institution's prospectively maintained database. Fluid balances were recorded intraoperatively and at 24hr postoperatively. Patients were stratified into tertiles of fluid administration (low, medium, high). Adjusted multivariable analysis was performed and outcome measures were postoperative complications.ResultsA total of 211 patients were included from 2012 to 2017. Complication rates were POPF(B/C) 19.4%, DGE(B/C) 14.7%, PPH(C) 10.0% and CDC ≥ IIIb 26.1%. In multivariable analysis, high perioperative fluid balance was an independent risk factor associated with POPF (OR = 10.5, 95%CI 2.7–40.7, p = .001), CDC (OR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.2–5.3, p < .002), DGE (OR = 2.3, 95%CI 1.0–5.2, p = .017), PPH (OR = 6.7 95%CI 2.2–20.0, p = .038) and reoperation (OR = 3.1, 95%CI 1.6–6.2, p = .006). In multivariable analysis with intraoperative and postoperative fluid balances as separate predictors, intraoperative (OR = 2,5, 95%CI 1.2–5.5, p = .04) and postoperative fluid balance (OR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.2–5.5, p = .02) were predictors of POPF. Postoperative fluid balance was the only predictor for mortality (OR = 4.5, 95%CI 1.0–18.9, p = .041) and predictor for CDC (OR = 2.0, 95%CI 1.0–4.0, p = .043) and OHS days (OR = 6.9, 95%CI 0.03–13.7, p = .038).ConclusionsHigh postoperative fluid balance in particular is associated with postoperative morbidity. Maintaining a fluid-restrictive strategy postoperatively should be recommended for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.     

Multifactorial mitigation strategy to reduce clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in high-risk pancreatojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy

IntroductionPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most dreadful complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and previous literature focused on technical modifications of pancreatic remnant reconstruction. We developed a multifactorial mitigation strategy (MS) and the aim of the study is to assess its clinical impact in patients at high-risk of POPF.MethodsAll patients candidate to PD between 2012 and 2018 were considered. Only patients with a high Fistula Risk Score (FRS 7–10) were included. Patients undergoing MS were compared to patients receiving Standard Strategy (SS). Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Multivariate hierarchical logistic regression analyses were performed to detect independent predictors of POPF.ResultsOut of 212 patients, 33 were finally included in MS Group and 29 in SS Group. POPF rate was significantly lower in MS Group (12.1% vs 44.8%, p = 0.005). Delayed gastric emptying, postoperative pancreatitis, complications and hospital stay were also significantly lower in MS Group. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses showed that Body Mass Index (OR = 1.196, p = 0.036) and MS (OR = 0.187, p = 0.032) were independently associated with POPF.ConclusionA multifactorial MS can be helpful to reduce POPF rate in patients with high FRS following PD. Personalized approach for vulnerable patients should be investigated in the future.     

Rapid postoperative reduction in prognostic nutrition index is associated with the development of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy

BackgroundsDespite recent advances in surgical techniques and devices for pancreatic remnant closure, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) still remains one of the common complications after distal pancreatectomy (DP). Identification of risk factors for POPF may lead to the development of new strategies to prevent this ominous complication.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data on 44 patients undergoing DP with the use of a stapler to identify risk factors for POPF. Study variables included preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and reduction rate of PNI on postoperative day (POD) 7.ResultsPOPF occurred in 23 patients (52%), of which 13 (56%) were grade B or C. Univariate analyses comparing patients with POPF and those without POPF showed significant differences in body mass index (P = 0.0102), pancreatic thickness (P = 0.0134), white blood cell count on POD7 (P = 0.0432), C-reactive protein level on POD7 (P = 0.0123), and PNI reduction rate (P = 0.0471). A multivariate analysis revealed pancreatic thickness (P = 0.0121) and PNI reduction rate (P = 0.0165) to be significant factors for POPF. Furthermore, the PNI reduction rate was significantly higher in patients with clinically relevant (grade B/C) POPF than in those with no or grade A POPF (P = 0.0257). In most patients, the massive postoperative PNI reduction preceded the diagnosis of clinically relevant POPF.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that rapid postoperative reduction in PNI is associated with the development of POPF.     

Somatostatin analogues and the risk of post-operative pancreatic fistulas after pancreatic resection - A systematic review & meta-analysis

BackgroundPost-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication of pancreatic resection. Somatostatin analogues (SA) have been used as prophylaxis to reduce its incidence. The aim of this study is to appraise the current literature on the effects of SA prophylaxis on the prevention of POPF following pancreatic resection.MethodsThe review of the literature was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data from studies that reported the effects of SA prophylaxis on POPF following pancreatic resection were extracted, to determine the effect of SA on POPF morbidity and mortality.ResultsA total of 15 studies, involving 2221 patients, were included. Meta-analysis revealed significant reductions in overall POPF (Odds ratio: 0.65 (95% CI 0.53–0.81, p < 0.01)), clinically significant POPF (Odds ratio: 0.53 (95% CI 0.34–0.83, p < 0.01)) and overall morbidity (OR: 0.69 (95% CI: 0.50–0.95, p = 0.02)) following SA prophylaxis. There is no evidence that SA prophylaxis reduces mortality (OR: 1.10 (95%CI: 0.68–1.79, p = 0.68)).ConclusionSA prophylaxis following pancreatic resection reduces the incidence of POPF. However, mortality is unaffected.     

Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on long-term oncologic outcomes after pancreatic resection

BackgroundThe short-term morbidity associated with post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is well established, however data regarding the long-term impact are lacking. We aim to characterize long-term oncologic outcomes of POPF after pancreatic resection through a single institution, retrospective study of pancreatic resections performed for adenocarcinoma from 2009 to 2016.MethodsKaplan–Meier survival analysis, logistic regression, and multivariate analysis (MVA) were used to evaluate impact of POPF on overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC).Results767 patients were included. 82 (10.6%) developed grade B (n = 67) or C (n = 15) POPF. Grade C POPF resulted in decreased OS when compared to no POPF (20.22 vs 26.33 months, p = 0.027) and to grade B POPF (20.22 vs. 26.87 months, p = 0.049). POPF patients were less likely to receive AC than those without POPF (59.5% vs 74.9%, p = 0.003) and grade C POPF were less likely to receive AC than all others (26.7% vs 74.2%, p = 0.0001).ConclusionPOPF patients are less likely to receive AC and more likely to have delay in time to AC. These factors are exacerbated in grade C POPF and likely contribute to decreased OS. These findings validate the clinical significance of the ISGPF definition of POPF.     

Somatostatin analogues for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after open pancreatoduodenectomy: A nationwide analysis

BackgroundSomatostatin analogues (SA) are currently used to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) development. However, its use is controversial. This study investigated the effect of different SA protocols on the incidence of POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy in a nationwide population.MethodsAll patients undergoing elective open pancreatoduodenectomy were included from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014–2017). Patients were divided into six groups: no SA, octreotide, lanreotide, pasireotide, octreotide only in high-risk (HR) patients and lanreotide only in HR patients. Primary endpoint was POPF grade B/C. The updated alternative Fistula Risk Score was used to compare POPF rates across various risk scenarios.Results1992 patients were included. Overall POPF rate was 13.1%. Lanreotide (10.0%), octreotide-HR (9.4%) and no protocol (12.7%) POPF rates were lower compared to the other protocols (varying from 15.1 to 19.1%, p = 0.001) in crude analysis. Sub-analysis in patients with HR of POPF showed a significantly lower rate of POPF when treated with lanreotide (10.0%) compared to no protocol, octreotide and pasireotide protocol (21.6–26.9%, p = 0.006). Octreotide-HR and lanreotide-HR protocol POPF rates were comparable to lanreotide protocol, however not significantly different from the other protocols. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated lanreotide protocol to be positively associated with a low odds-ratio (OR) for POPF (OR 0.387, 95% CI 0.180–0.834, p = 0.015). In-hospital mortality rates were not affected.ConclusionUse of lanreotide in all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy has a potential protective effect on POPF development. Protocols for HR patients only might be favorable too. However, future studies are warranted to confirm these findings.     

What should we trust to define,predict and assess pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy?

ObjectiveThe ISGPF postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) definition using amylase drain concentration is widely used. However, the interest of lipase drain concentration, daily drain output and absolute enzyme daily production (concentration x daily drain volume) have been poorly investigated.Material and methodsThese predictive on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, 5 and 7 were analyzed in a development cohort, and subsequently tested in an independent validation cohort.ResultsOf the 227 patients of the development cohort, 17% developed a biochemical fistula and 34% a POPF (Grade B/C). Strong correlation was found between amylase/lipase drain concentration at all postoperative days (ρ = 0.90; p = 0.001). Amylase and lipase were both significantly higher in patients with a POPF (p < 0.001) presenting an equivalent under the ROC curve area (0.85 vs 0.84; p = 0.466). Combining POD1 and POD3 threefold enzyme cut-off value increased significantly POPF prediction sensibility (97.4% vs 77.8%) and NPV (97.1% vs 86.3%). These results were also confirmed in the validation cohort of 554 patients. Finally, absolute enzyme daily production and daily drain output were significantly higher in patients with a POPF (p < 0.001) but did not add clinical value when compared to drain enzyme concentration.ConclusionLipase is as effective as amylase drain concentration to define POPF. Absolute enzyme daily production or daily drain output do not help to better predict clinically significant POPF occurrence and severity. Lipase and amylase should mainly be used for their negative predictive value to predict the absence of clinically significant POPF and could allow early drain removal and hospital discharge.     

A simple preoperative stratification tool predicting the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) can be associated with severe postoperative morbidity. This study aims to develop a preoperative POPF risk calculator that can be easily implemented in clinical routine.MethodsPatients undergoing PD were identified from a prospectively-maintained database. A total of 11 preoperative baseline and CT-based radiological parameters were used in a binominal logistic regression model. Parameters remaining predictive for grade B/C POPF were entered into the risk calculator and diagnostic accuracy measures and ROC curves were calculated for a training and a test patient cohort. The risk calculator was transformed into a simple nomogram.ResultsA total of 242 patients undergoing PD in the period from 2012 to 2018 were included. CT-imaging-based maximum main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter (p = 0.047), CT-imaging-based pancreatic gland diameter at the anticipated resection margin (p = 0.002) and gender (p = 0.058) were the parameters most predictive for grade B/C POPF. Based on these parameters, a risk calculator was developed to identify patients at high risk of developing grade B/C POPF. In a training cohort of PD patients this risk calculator was associated with an AUC of 0.808 (95%CI 0.726–0.874) and an AUC of 0.756 (95%CI 0.669-0-830) in the independent test cohort. A nomogram applicable as a visual risk scale for quick assessment of POPF grade B/C risk was developed.ConclusionThe preoperative POPF risk calculator provides a simple tool to stratify patients planned for PD according to the risk of developing postoperative grade B/C POPF. The nomogram visual risk scale can be easily integrated into clinical routine and may be a valuable model to select patients for POPF-preventive therapy or as a stratification tool for clinical trials.     

Density and enhancement of the pancreatic tail on computer tomography predicts acinar score and pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundAcinar score calculated at the pancreatic resection margin is associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The present study evaluates the association between (i) computed tomography (CT) density of the pancreas and the acinar score of the pancreatic resection margin, and (ii) CT density of the pancreas and POPF after PD.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent PD were included for analysis. CT densities of the pancreatic head, neck, body and tail were measured in non-contrast (NC), arterial (ART) and portal venous (PV) phases. Histologic slides of the pancreatic resection margin were scored for acinar cell density.ResultsNinety patients were included for analysis. Non-contrast density of the pancreatic tail was a good predictor of POPF (AUROC 0.704, p = 0.036), and a cut-off value of >40 Hounsfield units predicted POPF with 70.0% sensitivity and 73.4% specificity. The ratio of densities between PV and NC phases in the pancreatic tail was also a good predictor of POPF (AUROC 0.712, p = 0.030), and a cut-off value of <2.29 predicted POPF with 70.9% sensitivity and 80% specificity.ConclusionNon-contrast CT density of the pancreatic tail correlates with acinar cell density of the pancreatic resection margin and predicts the development of POPF after PD.     

Do somatostatin-analogues have the same impact on postoperative morbidity and pancreatic fistula in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy? – A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

ObjectivePostoperative pancreatic fistula/POPF is the most feared complication in pancreatic surgery. Although several systematic reviews investigated the impact of somatostatin analogues on POPF, no stratification was performed regarding type of pancreatic resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy/PD; distal pancreatectomy/DP) and different somatostatin analogues.MethodsThis study was planed according to the Preferred-Reporting-Items-for-Systematic –Review-and-Meta-Analysis/PRISMA-guidelines. After screening databases for randomized controlled trials/RCT, studies were stratified into pancreatic resection techniques and data were pooled in meta-analyses containing subgroups of octreotide, somatostatin, lanreotide, pasireotide and vapreotide.ResultsThe meta-analysis of studies with a mixed cohort of patients after pancreatic resection revealed a protective effect of somatostatin analogues for morbidity (RR: 0.71, p < .00001) but not for mortality (RR: 1.07, = 0.78) or intra-abdominal abscesses (RR: 1.00, p = 1.00). Moreover, no effect was visible for mortality (RR: 1.57, p = .15), morbidity (RR: 0.87, p = .15) and intra-abdominal abscesses (RR: 0.92, p = .48) after PD. The meta-analysis of patients after PD revealed no impact of somatostatin analogues on POPF (RR: 0.87, p = .19) and clinically relevant POPF (RR: 0.69, p = .30). However, treatment with somatostatin analogues in the mixed cohort showed less POPF (RR: 0.60, p < .00001) and clinically relevant POPF (RR: 0.47, p = .02), which was also the case after DP (RR: 0.41, p = .03).ConclusionSomatostatin analogues did not affect POPF and clinically relevant POPF after PD, but seemed to be associated with less POPF after DP. As no sufficiently powered RCT could be identified by the systematic review, further RCTs are urgently needed to investigate the effect of somatostatin analogues after DP.Study registrationCRD42018099808.     

Three-dimensional remnant pancreatic volume ratio indicates postoperative pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in pancreatic cancer patients after distal pancreatectomy

BackgroundPancreatectomy may cause serious pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), which can lead to some nutritional problems, including new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Recent studies have reported that remnant pancreatic volume (RPV) significantly influences postoperative PEI. However, the specific correlation between RPV and postoperative PEI remains unclear. Here, we compare various pre-, peri-, and postoperative risk factors in a retrospective cohort to address whether preoperatively measured RPV is a predictor of postoperative PEI in pancreatic cancer patients after distal pancreatectomy (DP).MethodsSixty-one pancreatic cancer patients who underwent DP were retrospectively enrolled. Pancreatic volume was measured using preoperative 3D images, which simulated the actual intraoperative pancreatic parenchymal volume. We obtained the 3D-measured RPV and resected pancreatic volume. We calculated the ratio of the RPV to the total pancreatic volume and then divided the cohort into high- and low-RPV ratio groups based on a cut-off value (>0.35, n = 37 and ≤ 0.35, n = 24). Using multivariate analysis, the RPV ratio as well as pre-, peri- and postoperative PEI risk factors were independently assessed.ResultsThe multivariate analysis revealed that a low RPV ratio (odds ratio [OR], 5.911; p = 0.001), a hard pancreatic texture (OR, 3.313; p = 0.023) and TNM stage III/IV (OR, 3.515; p = 0.031) were strong predictors of the incidence of PEI.ConclusionsThe present study indicates that the RPV ratio is an additional useful predictor of postoperative nutrition status in pancreatic cancer patients.     

Acute pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy: clinical outcomes and predictive factors analysis according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition

BackgroundPost-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) is an increasingly described complication after pancreatic resection. No uniform definition criteria were present in the literature until the recent proposal of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of the novel ISGPS definition of PPAP.MethodsPatients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) between 2006 and 2022 were enrolled. PPAP was defined and graded according to the ISGPS criteria.ResultsAmong 520 PDs, 120 (23%)patients developed post-operative hyperamylasemia (POH), while PPAP occurred in 63(12.1%) cases. PPAP occurrence related to a higher rate of more severe complications (48–76.1%vs118–25.8%; p < 0.0001), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (27–42.9%vd114–24.9%; p = 0.003) and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (57–90.5%vs186–40.8%; p < 0.0001). When stratified for PPAP severity, grade B and C patients more frequently developed major complications (p < 0.0001), POPF (p < 0.0001), DGE (p = 0.02) and post-operative hemorrhage (p < 0.0001) as compared to POH. At the multivariable analysis, soft pancreatic texture (p = 0.01)and a Wirsung diameter ≤3 mm (p = 0.01) were recognized as prognostic factors for PPAP onset, while a pancreatic duct ≤3 mm was the only feature significantly influencing a more severe course of PPAP (p = 0.01).ConclusionThe ISGPS classification is confirmed as a valuable method for a uniform definition and clinical course evaluation. Further studies in a prospective manner are still needed for a further confirmation.     

Preoperative adiposity at bioimpedance vector analysis improves the ability of Fistula Risk Score (FRS) in predicting pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

BackgroundAnthropometric parameters have been associated with increased risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Nonetheless, conventional metrics to predict POPF do not include the assessment of body composition. We aimed to validate the most used Fistula Risk Score (FRS), and to assess whether the appraisal of adipose compartment at bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) improves the accuracy of FRS in CR-POPF prediction.MethodPD patients from 3 Italian academic institutions were prospectively included over a 2-year period. Patients with ASA score ≥3, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or compartmentalized fluid collections were excluded. BIVA was performed on the day prior to surgery. CR-POPF occurrence and severity were classified per the ISGPS classification.ResultsOut of 148 PDs, 84 patients (56.8%) had pancreatic cancer, and 29 (19.6%) experienced CR-POPF. FRS elements, namely soft pancreatic texture (p = 0.009), small pancreatic duct diameter (p = 0.029), but not blood loss (p = 0.450), as well as high BMI (p = 0.004) were associated with CR-POPF. Also, the preoperative fat mass (FM) amount measured at BIVA was significantly higher in patients who developed CR-POPF, compared to those who did not (median FM = 19.4 kg/m2 vs. 14.4 kg/m2, respectively; p = 0.005). The predictive ability of a multivariate model adding FM to the FRS, assessed at the receiver operating characteristics curve showed a higher accuracy than the FRS alone (AUC = 0.774 and AUC = 0.738, respectively).ConclusionsAssessment of preoperative FM at BIVA can improve the accuracy of FRS in predicting CR-POPF following pancreatoduodenectomy.     

Preoperative biliary drainage of severely obstructive jaundiced patients decreases overall postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective and propensity score-matched analysis

ObjectivesThe influence of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) for obstructive jaundiced patients before pancreaticoduodenectomy is debated in the past decades. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of preoperative biliary drainage on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with severely obstructive jaundice.MethodsData were collected retrospectively from severely obstructive jaundiced patients with serum total bilirubin level exceeding 250 μmol/L and undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2012 to December 2017. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess independent risk factors for overall postoperative complications. A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was performed to adjust baseline characteristics between PBD and direct surgery (DS) groups. After PSM, intraoperative data and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 200 patients were included. The rate of overall postoperative complication occurred in 119 (59.5%) patients, with prealbumin <150 mg/L (OR = 3.03; 95%CI = [1.63–5.62]; p < 0.001), ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology score) classification II-III (OR = 2.27; 95%CI = [1.21–4.27]; p = 0.011), and direct surgery (OR = 3.88; 95%CI = [1.67–8.99]; p = 0.002) identified as independent risk factors in multivariate analysis. After PSM, there was similar operative time and intraoperative transfusion between PBD and DS group. However, DS group had a higher incidence of overall postoperative complication (p = 0.005), grades B and C of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) (p = 0.032), and grades B and C of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (p = 0.045) compared to PBD group.ConclusionsIn this retrospective study, in order to reduce overall postoperative complications, PBD should be performed routinely for those patients with serum total bilirubin level exceeding 250 μmol/L and undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.     

Routine prophylactic abdominal drainage versus no-drain strategy after distal pancreatectomy: A multicenter propensity score matched analysis

Background/Objectives Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the most common complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP). Traditionally, surgical drains are placed routinely after DP, but some question its efficacy and postulate that the use of drains may convert a self-limiting postoperative collection into a POPF. This study aimed to compare outcomes between three institutions with varying drainage strategies.MethodsThe study is a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of intraoperative prophylactic drain placement during DP (2010–2019). The primary outcome is major morbidity. Propensity score matching was used to obtain comparable groups.ResultsOverall, 963 patients after DP were included. One center did not place a surgical drain routinely, but decided to place a drain when unsatisfactory pancreatic closure occurred. Prophylactic abdominal drains were placed in 805 patients (84%) of which 74 could be matched to 74 patients without a drain. The rate of major morbidity (8% vs 19%, p = 0.054) and radiological interventions (5% vs 12%, p = 0.147) were non-significantly lower in the no-drain group as compared to the prophylactic drain group, respectively. The rates of POPF (4% vs 16%, p = 0.014) were lower in the no-drain group.ConclusionIn this international retrospective multicenter study, a selective no-drain strategy after DP was not associated with higher rates major morbidity or radiological interventions as compared to routine prophylactic abdominal drainage. Although the rate of POPF was lower in the no-drain group, randomized trials should confirm the safety and outcome of a no-drain strategy after DP.     

Division of the pancreas at the neck reduces postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Comparison of pancreatic division at the body

Backgroundobjectives: During laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), the optimal site for pancreatic division with consideration of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is unclear. We evaluate which site of pancreatic division, neck or body, has better outcomes after LDP.MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational study. LDP was performed in 102 consecutive patients between December 2009 and May 2020. After excluding 14 patients with pancreatic division at tail, 88 patients (pancreatic division at neck n = 46, at body n = 42) were included in this study. Short- and long-term outcomes after LDP were compared between pancreatic division at neck and body.ResultsThe pancreatic transection site was thicker at body than at neck (17.5 vs. 11.9 mm, P < 0.001), although there were no significant differences of pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct size. The Grade B/C POPF rate was significantly higher when the pancreas was divided at body than when divided at neck (21.4 vs. 6.5%, P = 0.042). We found no significant differences between pancreatic division at neck and body in residual pancreatic volume (34.0 vs. 34.8 ml, P = 0.855), incidence of new-onset or worsening diabetes mellitus more than six months after LDP (P = 0.218), or body weight change (six-month: P = 0.116, one-year: P = 0.108, two-year: P = 0.195, tree-year: P = 0.131, four-year: P = 0.608, five-year: P = 0.408).ConclusionThis study suggests that the pancreatic division at neck might reduce the Grade B/C POPF incidence after LDP, compared to division at body. A potential reason is that the pancreas at body is thicker than that at neck. However, further large-scale studies are necessary to confirm our results.     

Impact of pancreatic fat infiltration on postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence in patients undergoing invagination pancreaticojejunostomy

BackgroundNo studies to date have determined the impact of pancreatic fat infiltration on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurrence in patients undergoing invagination pancreaticojejunostomy (IV-PJ).MethodsThe medical records of patients with a soft pancreas who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy followed by IV-PJ were reviewed . The pancreatic fat ratio on computed tomography (CT) images (I-PFR) was determined using preoperative CT and verified by histologic examination. The relationship between the I-PFR and POPF occurrence was determined. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on I-PFR value (fatty and non-fatty pancreas). Postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups, and specifically among patients who developed POPF.ResultsOf 221 patients, POPF occurred in 67 (30.3%). I-PFR was positively correlated with histologic-calculated fat ratio (ρ = 0.517, p < 0.001). This index was shown to be an independent predictor of POPF. Based on an I-PFR cut-off value of 3.2%, 92 patients were classified in the fatty pancreas group. Subgroup analysis of the patients who developed POPF showed that incidence of abscess formation and hemorrhage tended to be higher in patients with fatty pancreas than in those with non-fatty pancreas.ConclusionsPancreatic fat infiltration is highly associated with POPF and possibly causes subsequent serious complications in patients undergoing IV-PJ.