Internalizing MHC class II–peptide complexes are ubiquitinated in early endosomes and targeted for lysosomal degradation

As sentinels of the immune system, dendritic cells (DCs) continuously generate and turnover antigenic peptide–MHC class II complexes (pMHC-II). pMHC-II generation is a complex process that involves many well-characterized MHC-II biosynthetic intermediates; however, the mechanisms leading to MHC-II turnover/degradation are poorly understood. We now show that pMHC-II complexes undergoing clathrin-independent endocytosis from the DC surface are efficiently ubiquitinated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase March-I in early endosomes, whereas biosynthetically immature MHC-II–Invariant chain (Ii) complexes are not. The inability of MHC-II–Ii to serve as a March-I substrate is a consequence of Ii sorting motifs that divert the MHC-II–Ii complex away from March-I⁺ early endosomes. When these sorting motifs are mutated, or when clathrin-mediated endocytosis is inhibited, MHC-II–Ii complexes internalize by using a clathrin-independent endocytosis pathway and are now ubiquitinated as efficiently as pMHC-II complexes. These data show that the selective ubiquitination of internalizing surface pMHC-II in March-I⁺ early endosomes promotes degradation of “old” pMHC-II and spares forms of MHC-II that have not yet loaded antigenic peptides or have not yet reached the DC surface.Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that capture protein antigens by endocytosis and digest these internalized proteins into peptides in endo-/lysosomal compartments (1). These peptides are loaded onto MHC class II molecules (MHC-II) in antigen-processing compartments, and peptide-loaded MHC-II (pMHC-II) traffics to the DC plasma membrane. The interaction of specific pMHC-II on APCs with specific receptors on naïve CD4 T cells stimulates the activation and proliferation of CD4 T cells (1, 2). Each DC potentially expresses thousands of distinct pMHC-II complexes in which the MHC-II–bound peptides represent a sampling of the DC microenvironment.Resting (i.e., immature) DCs generate and express pMHC-II complexes on their surface, and, at steady state, the rates of MHC-II synthesis and degradation are equal. Stimulation of APCs, either by Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands or by exposure to other “danger” signals, ultimately reduces the rate of MHC-II synthesis and prolongs MHC-II t_1/2 (3, 4), processes that allow the DC to preserve on their surface pMHC-II complexes generated at the time of DC activation. Given the importance of antigenic pMHC-II in the initiation of antigen-specific T cell responses, there is intense interest in elucidating the mechanisms regulating pMHC-II generation and turnover in professional APCs.Newly synthesized MHC-II αβ-dimers begin their transport to the plasma membrane by binding to a chaperone protein termed the invariant chain (Ii) in the ER (5). Most MHC-II–Ii complexes then leave the ER, traverse the Golgi apparatus, and are transported to cell surface. When they are at the cell surface, MHC-II–Ii complexes are rapidly internalized by clathrin-mediated endocytosis, pass through early endosomes, and are ultimately sorted to late endosomal/prelysosomal compartments, where Ii proteolysis generates an MHC-II αβ-dimer. In these antigen presentation compartments, the class II-associated Ii-polypeptide is removed from the peptide-binding groove of MHC-II by the enzymatic activity of HLA-DM (6), thereby liberating the peptide-binding site to allow for high-affinity peptide binding to MHC-II before its movement to the plasma membrane.pMHC-II expressed on the surface of APCs is not static, and these complexes are internalized and can recycle back to the cell surface or be targeted for degradation in lysosomes (7–9). We have reported that, unlike MHC-II-Ii complexes, pMHC-II complexes internalize by using a clathrin-independent endocytosis pathway that involves passage through Arf6⁺Rab35⁺ tubular endosomes (10). Thus, the fate of internalized pMHC-II strongly influences the overall stability of pMHC-II in DCs.Ubiquitination of membrane proteins acts as a signal for clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent endocytosis and targets ubiquitinated receptors to multivesicular bodies (MVBs), a process that ultimately leads to lysosomal degradation of ubiquitinated cargo molecules (11). Cell surface expression of pMHC-II is also regulated by ubiquitination of a cytosolic lysine residue (Lys₂₂₅) present in the cytosolic domain of the MHC-II β-chain (12, 13). The E3 ligase March-I ubiquitinates MHC-II in B cells (14) and DCs (15) and dramatically affects MHC-II surface expression in these APCs. March-I is expressed on immature (resting) DCs, and activation of DCs with a variety of TLR-ligands leads to March-I downregulation (15, 16) and prevents MHC-II ubiquitination (12, 13, 15, 16). Curiously, it has been reported that Ii-associated MHC-II is not ubiquitinated in DCs (13, 15), suggesting that ubiquitination of MHC-II is tightly controlled in APCs.Although a role for ubiquitination in regulating surface stability of pMHC-II has been revealed (15, 17), the mechanism behind the selectivity of March-I for different forms of MHC-II remains to be determined. In this study, we have asked in what intracellular compartment MHC-II is ubiquitinated and how MHC-II–Ii complexes are spared from ubiquitination by March-I. We found that the integrity of the dileucine sorting motif in Ii is required for the MHC-II–Ii complex to avoid ubiquitination by March-I. Although pMHC-II complexes are internalized and distributed in March-I⁺ endosomes, internalized MHC-II–Ii complexes are not. Furthermore, we found that inhibition of clathrin-dependent endocytosis directly promotes ubiquitination of MHC-II–Ii complexes. Our data thus show that MHC-II–Ii complexes avoid ubiquitination by March-I by using a rapid clathrin-dependent endocytosis pathway that limits the amount of time MHC-II–Ii complexes are present in March-I⁺ endosomes.     

Autoinhibition and relief mechanism by the proteolytic processing of Toll-like receptor 8

Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) senses single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) and initiates innate immune responses. TLR8 requires proteolytic cleavage at the loop region (Z-loop) between leucine-rich repeat (LRR) 14 and LRR15 for its activation. However, the molecular basis of Z-loop processing remains unknown. To elucidate the mechanism of Z-loop processing, we performed biochemical and structural studies of how the Z-loop affects the function of TLR8. TLR8 with the uncleaved Z-loop is unable to form a dimer, which is essential for activation, irrespective of the presence of agonistic ligands. Crystallographic analysis revealed that the uncleaved Z-loop located on the ascending lateral face prevents the approach of the dimerization partner by steric hindrance. This autoinhibition mechanism of dimerization by the Z-loop might be occurring in the proteins of the same subfamily, TLR7 and TLR9.Toll-like receptors (TLRs) constitute a family of innate immune receptors that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (1). The TLR molecule is a type I transmembrane protein characterized by an extracellular leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain, a transmembrane helix, and an intracellular Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) homology domain (2). The typical TLR molecule is considered to be monomeric in the absence of ligands, transforming into an activated dimer form on ligand binding, which allows for dimerization of the intracellular TIR domain and subsequent signaling (2).The TLR subfamily comprising TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 recognizes single-stranded (ss) nucleic acids from viruses and bacteria (3). Specifically, TLR7 and TLR8 recognize uridine- and guanosine-rich single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) (4–11), whereas TLR9 recognizes ssDNA containing the unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) dideoxynucleotide motif (12). Furthermore, TLR7 and TLR8 are also activated by synthetic chemical compounds (13, 14), such as imiquimod (TLR7-specific), resiquimod (R848; both TLR7 and TLR8), and CL075 (both TLR7 and TLR8).Certain regulation mechanisms of the functions of the TLR7–9 subfamily members are shared because of a high degree of sequence similarities (3). They reside on the endosomal membrane, and their transportation from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to endolysosomes is mediated by the ER membrane protein Unc93B1 (15). Moreover, TLR7–9 possess a long inserted loop region (Z-loop), consisting of ∼30 amino acid residues, between LRR14 and LRR15, and the processing by proteolytic cleavage at the Z-loop is believed to be indispensable for their function (16–21). Specifically, the processing at the Z-loop of human TLR8 mediated by furin-like proprotein convertase and cathepsins produces functional TLR8 capable of ligand binding and signaling in endolysosomes. In addition, the cleaved form of TLR8 has been found to be predominant in immune cells (16). Recent structural studies demonstrate that the N- and C-terminal halves of TLR8 after Z-loop cleavage associate with each other, and that both fragments are cooperatively involved in ligand binding (22). Moreover, a recent study revealed that the latter half of the cleaved Z-loop interacts with LRRs to stabilize the TLR8 structure and contributes to ssRNA recognition by TLR8 (23).Although accumulating evidence illustrates the functional importance of Z-loop processing at the cellular level, mechanistic insights into this processing in the regulation of TLR8 function at the molecular level are lacking. Here, to unveil the mechanistic role of Z-loop processing of TLR8, we present the results of a combined structural and biochemical investigation of TLR8 with the uncleaved Z-loop.     

Structural basis for inhibition of TLR2 by staphylococcal superantigen-like protein 3 (SSL3)

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are crucial in innate recognition of invading micro-organisms and their subsequent clearance. Bacteria are not passive bystanders and have evolved complex evasion mechanisms. Staphylococcus aureus secretes a potent TLR2 antagonist, staphylococcal superantigen-like protein 3 (SSL3), which prevents receptor stimulation by pathogen-associated lipopeptides. Here, we present crystal structures of SSL3 and its complex with TLR2. The structure reveals that formation of the specific inhibitory complex is predominantly mediated by hydrophobic contacts between SSL3 and TLR2 and does not involve interaction of TLR2–glycans with the conserved Lewis^X binding site of SSL3. In the complex, SSL3 partially covers the entrance to the lipopeptide binding pocket in TLR2, reducing its size by ∼50%. We show that this is sufficient to inhibit binding of agonist Pam₂CSK₄ effectively, yet allows SSL3 to bind to an already formed TLR2–Pam₂CSK₄ complex. The binding site of SSL3 overlaps those of TLR2 dimerization partners TLR1 and TLR6 extensively. Combined, our data reveal a robust dual mechanism in which SSL3 interferes with TLR2 activation at two stages: by binding to TLR2, it blocks ligand binding and thus inhibits activation. Second, by interacting with an already formed TLR2–lipopeptide complex, it prevents TLR heterodimerization and downstream signaling.In recent years, Staphylococcus aureus has become a major health threat to both humans and domestic animals. It is found as a commensal bacterium in ∼30% of the human population, but when it becomes infectious it can cause a wide diversity of diseases, ranging from mild skin infections to life-threatening invasive conditions such as pneumonia and sepsis (1). Increased antibiotic resistance and a high amount of virulence factors secreted by S. aureus contribute to its emergence as a pathogen. Among these secreted virulence factors are the staphylococcal superantigen-like proteins (SSLs), a family of 14 proteins located on two genomic clusters (2–4). Recently, we and others identified SSL3 as a potent inhibitor of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) (5, 6), an innate immunity receptor that is a dominant factor in immune recognition of S. aureus (7–10).TLR2 belongs to a family of 10 homologous innate immunity receptors that are activated by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (11). TLR2 binds bacterial lipopeptides and lipoproteins. Subsequent formation of heterodimers with TLR1 or TLR6 leads to MyD88-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway (12). TLR2 has dual ligand specificity that is determined by its dimerization partner; stimulation by diacyl lipopeptides from Gram-positive bacteria, including S. aureus, induces the formation of heterodimers with TLR6 (13), whereas triacyl lipopeptides from Gram-negative bacteria initiate formation of TLR2–TLR1 dimers (14). The structural basis for lipopeptide specificity was revealed by crystal structures of TLR2–TLR1 and TLR2–TLR6 complexes with their respective lipopeptide analogs Pam₃CSK₄ and Pam₂CSK₄: TLR2 binds two lipid tails in a large hydrophobic pocket, whereas the third lipid tail of triacyl lipopeptides is accommodated by a smaller pocket present in TLR1, but not in TLR6 (15, 16).The family of SSL proteins, including SSL3, share structural similarities to superantigens, but lack superantigenic activity. Interestingly, the functions that have been discovered for SSLs so far have all been linked to immune evasion. SSL5 inhibits neutrophil extravasation (17, 18) and phagocyte function (19, 20), SSL7 binds IgA and inhibits complement (21), and SSL10 inhibits IgG1-mediated phagocytosis (22, 23), blood coagulation (24), and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 (25). In addition to SSL3, also weak TLR2 inhibitory activity was observed for SSL4 (5), but it remains unknown whether that is its dominant function. This variety of immunomodulatory molecules and functions reflects the importance of the different components of our innate immune system in the defense against S. aureus (26).In this study we determined the crystal structures of SSL3 and the SSL3–TLR2 complex. In combination with mutagenesis and binding studies, our data provide a novel working mechanism of a functional TLR2 antagonist.     

Inhibition of TLR2 signaling by small molecule inhibitors targeting a pocket within the TLR2 TIR domain

Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling is initiated by dimerization of intracellular Toll/IL-1 receptor resistance (TIR) domains. For all TLRs except TLR3, recruitment of the adapter, myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88), to TLR TIR domains results in downstream signaling culminating in proinflammatory cytokine production. Therefore, blocking TLR TIR dimerization may ameliorate TLR2-mediated hyperinflammatory states. The BB loop within the TLR TIR domain is critical for mediating certain protein–protein interactions. Examination of the human TLR2 TIR domain crystal structure revealed a pocket adjacent to the highly conserved P681 and G682 BB loop residues. Using computer-aided drug design (CADD), we sought to identify a small molecule inhibitor(s) that would fit within this pocket and potentially disrupt TLR2 signaling. In silico screening identified 149 compounds and 20 US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs based on their predicted ability to bind in the BB loop pocket. These compounds were screened in HEK293T-TLR2 transfectants for the ability to inhibit TLR2-mediated IL-8 mRNA. C₁₆H₁₅NO₄ (C29) was identified as a potential TLR2 inhibitor. C29, and its derivative, ortho-vanillin (o-vanillin), inhibited TLR2/1 and TLR2/6 signaling induced by synthetic and bacterial TLR2 agonists in human HEK-TLR2 and THP-1 cells, but only TLR2/1 signaling in murine macrophages. C29 failed to inhibit signaling induced by other TLR agonists and TNF-α. Mutagenesis of BB loop pocket residues revealed an indispensable role for TLR2/1, but not TLR2/6, signaling, suggesting divergent roles. Mice treated with o-vanillin exhibited reduced TLR2-induced inflammation. Our data provide proof of principle that targeting the BB loop pocket is an effective approach for identification of TLR2 signaling inhibitors.Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are type I transmembrane receptors that detect conserved “pathogen-associated molecular patterns” from microbes, as well as host-derived “danger-associated molecular patterns” (1). TLR2 heterodimerizes with TLR6 or TLR1 to recognize diacyl lipopeptides or triacyl lipopeptides, respectively (2, 3), present in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (4–9).Ligand engagement of TLR2/1 or TLR2/6 activates the myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88)-dependent pathway (i.e., nuclear translocation of NF-κB, activation of MAPKs), resulting in production of proinflammatory cytokines (10). Dysregulated TLR2 signaling has been implicated in numerous diseases (e.g., sepsis, atherosclerosis, tumor metastasis, ischemia/reperfusion injury) (11–14). Several inhibitors of TLR2 signaling have been developed (15–18), yet none is licensed for human use. A better understanding of the Toll/IL-1 receptor resistance (TIR) domain interactions involved in TLR2 signaling could lead to novel therapeutic agents.Both TLRs and adapter proteins contain a cytoplasmic TIR domain that mediates homotypic and heterotypic interactions during TLR signaling (19). Two adapter proteins implicated in TLR2 signaling are MyD88 and TIRAP (Mal). A conserved Pro [e.g., P681 in human TLR2 (hTLR2), P712 in murine TLR4 (mTLR4), P674 in hTLR10, P804 in mTLR11] within the BB loop of almost all TIR domains is critical for signaling (20–27). More importantly, the BB loop P681H mutation in hTLR2 abolished recruitment of MyD88 and signaling (20, 26). Based on this evidence, the BB loop within the TLR2 TIR domain appears to be an ideal target for attenuation of TLR2 signaling.Visual inspection of the crystal structure of the hTLR2 TIR domain (26) revealed a pocket formed by residues on the β-B strand and α-B helix that includes the highly conserved Pro and Gly residues of the BB loop. We hypothesized that targeting this pocket with a small molecule might inhibit interaction of TLR2 with MyD88, and thereby blunt TLR2 signaling. We identified C₁₆H₁₅NO₄ (C29) and its derivative, ortho-vanillin (o-vanillin), which inhibit mTLR2 and hTLR2 signaling initiated by synthetic and bacterial agonists without cytotoxicity. Interestingly, mutation of the BB loop pocket residues revealed a differential requirement for TLR2/1 vs. TLR2/6 signaling. Our data indicate that computer-aided drug design (CADD) is an effective approach for identifying small molecule inhibitors of TLR2 signaling and has the potential to identify inhibitors for other TLR signaling pathways.     

Structural interactions of a voltage sensor toxin with lipid membranes

Protein toxins from tarantula venom alter the activity of diverse ion channel proteins, including voltage, stretch, and ligand-activated cation channels. Although tarantula toxins have been shown to partition into membranes, and the membrane is thought to play an important role in their activity, the structural interactions between these toxins and lipid membranes are poorly understood. Here, we use solid-state NMR and neutron diffraction to investigate the interactions between a voltage sensor toxin (VSTx1) and lipid membranes, with the goal of localizing the toxin in the membrane and determining its influence on membrane structure. Our results demonstrate that VSTx1 localizes to the headgroup region of lipid membranes and produces a thinning of the bilayer. The toxin orients such that many basic residues are in the aqueous phase, all three Trp residues adopt interfacial positions, and several hydrophobic residues are within the membrane interior. One remarkable feature of this preferred orientation is that the surface of the toxin that mediates binding to voltage sensors is ideally positioned within the lipid bilayer to favor complex formation between the toxin and the voltage sensor.Protein toxins from venomous organisms have been invaluable tools for studying the ion channel proteins they target. For example, in the case of voltage-activated potassium (Kv) channels, pore-blocking scorpion toxins were used to identify the pore-forming region of the channel (1, 2), and gating modifier tarantula toxins that bind to S1–S4 voltage-sensing domains have helped to identify structural motifs that move at the protein–lipid interface (3–5). In many instances, these toxin–channel interactions are highly specific, allowing them to be used in target validation and drug development (6–8).Tarantula toxins are a particularly interesting class of protein toxins that have been found to target all three families of voltage-activated cation channels (3, 9–12), stretch-activated cation channels (13–15), as well as ligand-gated ion channels as diverse as acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC) (16–21) and transient receptor potential (TRP) channels (22, 23). The tarantula toxins targeting these ion channels belong to the inhibitor cystine knot (ICK) family of venom toxins that are stabilized by three disulfide bonds at the core of the molecule (16, 17, 24–31). Although conventional tarantula toxins vary in length from 30 to 40 aa and contain one ICK motif, the recently discovered double-knot toxin (DkTx) that specifically targets TRPV1 channels contains two separable lobes, each containing its own ICK motif (22, 23).One unifying feature of all tarantula toxins studied thus far is that they act on ion channels by modifying the gating properties of the channel. The best studied of these are the tarantula toxins targeting voltage-activated cation channels, where the toxins bind to the S3b–S4 voltage sensor paddle motif (5, 32–36), a helix-turn-helix motif within S1–S4 voltage-sensing domains that moves in response to changes in membrane voltage (37–41). Toxins binding to S3b–S4 motifs can influence voltage sensor activation, opening and closing of the pore, or the process of inactivation (4, 5, 36, 42–46). The tarantula toxin PcTx1 can promote opening of ASIC channels at neutral pH (16, 18), and DkTx opens TRPV1 in the absence of other stimuli (22, 23), suggesting that these toxin stabilize open states of their target channels.For many of these tarantula toxins, the lipid membrane plays a key role in the mechanism of inhibition. Strong membrane partitioning has been demonstrated for a range of toxins targeting S1–S4 domains in voltage-activated channels (27, 44, 47–50), and for GsMTx4 (14, 50), a tarantula toxin that inhibits opening of stretch-activated cation channels in astrocytes, as well as the cloned stretch-activated Piezo1 channel (13, 15). In experiments on stretch-activated channels, both the d- and l-enantiomers of GsMTx4 are active (14, 50), implying that the toxin may not bind directly to the channel. In addition, both forms of the toxin alter the conductance and lifetimes of gramicidin channels (14), suggesting that the toxin inhibits stretch-activated channels by perturbing the interface between the membrane and the channel. In the case of Kv channels, the S1–S4 domains are embedded in the lipid bilayer and interact intimately with lipids (48, 51, 52) and modification in the lipid composition can dramatically alter gating of the channel (48, 53–56). In one study on the gating of the Kv2.1/Kv1.2 paddle chimera (53), the tarantula toxin VSTx1 was proposed to inhibit Kv channels by modifying the forces acting between the channel and the membrane. Although these studies implicate a key role for the membrane in the activity of Kv and stretch-activated channels, and for the action of tarantula toxins, the influence of the toxin on membrane structure and dynamics have not been directly examined. The goal of the present study was to localize a tarantula toxin in membranes using structural approaches and to investigate the influence of the toxin on the structure of the lipid bilayer.     

Self-assembly of alkynylplatinum(II) terpyridine amphiphiles into nanostructures via steric control and metal–metal interactions

A series of mono- and dinuclear alkynylplatinum(II) terpyridine complexes containing the hydrophilic oligo(para-phenylene ethynylene) with two 3,6,9-trioxadec-1-yloxy chains was designed and synthesized. The mononuclear alkynylplatinum(II) terpyridine complex was found to display a very strong tendency toward the formation of supramolecular structures. Interestingly, additional end-capping with another platinum(II) terpyridine moiety of various steric bulk at the terminal alkyne would lead to the formation of nanotubes or helical ribbons. These desirable nanostructures were found to be governed by the steric bulk on the platinum(II) terpyridine moieties, which modulates the directional metal−metal interactions and controls the formation of nanotubes or helical ribbons. Detailed analysis of temperature-dependent UV-visible absorption spectra of the nanostructured tubular aggregates also provided insights into the assembly mechanism and showed the role of metal−metal interactions in the cooperative supramolecular polymerization of the amphiphilic platinum(II) complexes.Square-planar d⁸ platinum(II) polypyridine complexes have long been known to exhibit intriguing spectroscopic and luminescence properties (1–54) as well as interesting solid-state polymorphism associated with metal−metal and π−π stacking interactions (1–14, 25). Earlier work by our group showed the first example, to our knowledge, of an alkynylplatinum(II) terpyridine system [Pt(tpy)(C ≡ CR)]⁺ that incorporates σ-donating and solubilizing alkynyl ligands together with the formation of Pt···Pt interactions to exhibit notable color changes and luminescence enhancements on solvent composition change (25) and polyelectrolyte addition (26). This approach has provided access to the alkynylplatinum(II) terpyridine and other related cyclometalated platinum(II) complexes, with functionalities that can self-assemble into metallogels (27–31), liquid crystals (32, 33), and other different molecular architectures, such as hairpin conformation (34), helices (35–38), nanostructures (39–45), and molecular tweezers (46, 47), as well as having a wide range of applications in molecular recognition (48–52), biomolecular labeling (48–52), and materials science (53, 54). Recently, metal-containing amphiphiles have also emerged as a building block for supramolecular architectures (42–44, 55–59). Their self-assembly has always been found to yield different molecular architectures with unprecedented complexity through the multiple noncovalent interactions on the introduction of external stimuli (42–44, 55–59).Helical architecture is one of the most exciting self-assembled morphologies because of the uniqueness for the functional and topological properties (60–69). Helical ribbons composed of amphiphiles, such as diacetylenic lipids, glutamates, and peptide-based amphiphiles, are often precursors for the growth of tubular structures on an increase in the width or the merging of the edges of ribbons (64, 65). Recently, the optimization of nanotube formation vs. helical nanostructures has aroused considerable interests and can be achieved through a fine interplay of the influence on the amphiphilic property of molecules (66), choice of counteranions (67, 68), or pH values of the media (69), which would govern the self-assembly of molecules into desirable aggregates of helical ribbons or nanotube scaffolds. However, a precise control of supramolecular morphology between helical ribbons and nanotubes remains challenging, particularly for the polycyclic aromatics in the field of molecular assembly (64–69). Oligo(para-phenylene ethynylene)s (OPEs) with solely π−π stacking interactions are well-recognized to self-assemble into supramolecular system of various nanostructures but rarely result in the formation of tubular scaffolds (70–73). In view of the rich photophysical properties of square-planar d⁸ platinum(II) systems and their propensity toward formation of directional Pt···Pt interactions in distinctive morphologies (27–31, 39–45), it is anticipated that such directional and noncovalent metal−metal interactions might be capable of directing or dictating molecular ordering and alignment to give desirable nanostructures of helical ribbons or nanotubes in a precise and controllable manner.Herein, we report the design and synthesis of mono- and dinuclear alkynylplatinum(II) terpyridine complexes containing hydrophilic OPEs with two 3,6,9-trioxadec-1-yloxy chains. The mononuclear alkynylplatinum(II) terpyridine complex with amphiphilic property is found to show a strong tendency toward the formation of supramolecular structures on diffusion of diethyl ether in dichloromethane or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solution. Interestingly, additional end-capping with another platinum(II) terpyridine moiety of various steric bulk at the terminal alkyne would result in nanotubes or helical ribbons in the self-assembly process. To the best of our knowledge, this finding represents the first example of the utilization of the steric bulk of the moieties, which modulates the formation of directional metal−metal interactions to precisely control the formation of nanotubes or helical ribbons in the self-assembly process. Application of the nucleation–elongation model into this assembly process by UV-visible (UV-vis) absorption spectroscopic studies has elucidated the nature of the molecular self-assembly, and more importantly, it has revealed the role of metal−metal interactions in the formation of these two types of nanostructures.     

UNC93B1 is essential for the plasma membrane localization and signaling of Toll-like receptor 5

The proper trafficking and localization of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are important for specific ligand recognition and efficient signal transduction. The TLRs sensing bacterial membrane components are expressed on the cell surface and recruit signaling adaptors to the plasma membrane upon stimulation. On the contrary, the nucleotide-sensing TLRs are mostly found inside cells and signal from the endolysosomes in an acidic pH-dependent manner. Trafficking of the nucleotide-sensing TLRs from the endoplasmic reticulum to the endolysosomes strictly depends on UNC93B1, and their signaling is completely abolished in the 3d mutant mice bearing the H412R mutation of UNC93B1. In contrast, UNC93B1 was considered to have no role for the cell surface-localized TLRs and signaling via TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, and TLR6 is normal in the 3d mice. Unexpectedly, we discovered that TLR5, a cell surface receptor for bacterial protein flagellin, also requires UNC93B1 for plasma membrane localization and signaling. TLR5 physically interacts with UNC93B1, and the cells from the 3d or UNC93B1-deficient mice not only lack TLR5 at the plasma membrane but also fail to secret cytokines and to up-regulate costimulatory molecules upon flagellin stimulation, demonstrating the essential role of UNC93B1 in TLR5 signaling. Our study reveals that the role of UNC93B1 is not limited to the TLRs signaling from the endolysosomes and compels the further probing of the mechanisms underlying the UNC93B1-assisted differential targeting of TLRs.Toll-like receptors (TLRs) sense unique microbial structures or host-derived molecules released from stressed or dying cells to initiate the innate immune responses (1). TLRs are composed of three domains: the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain responsible for ligand binding, a single transmembrane domain, and the cytoplasmic Toll/IL-1 receptor homology domain by which TLRs recruit adaptor molecules for downstream signal transduction. Activated TLRs stimulate the NF-κB, MAPK, and IFN regulatory factor pathways, leading to the expression of diverse inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and type I interferons. TLRs also activate antigen presenting cells to induce costimulatory molecules and coordinate various aspects of adaptive immune responses (2).The members of the TLR family can be classified into two groups based on their subcellular localization patterns (3–5). TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, and TLR6, which mainly recognize the components of bacterial cell membrane, are located on the cell surface and initiate signaling thereat. In contrast, the nucleotide-sensing TLRs such as TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9, and TLR13 are largely found in endolysosomes and require an acidic environment for their efficient signaling. Additionally, TLR11 and TLR12, the sensors for Toxoplasma protein profilin, are also expressed inside cells and transmit signals in an acidic pH-dependent manner (6–8). All the intracellular TLRs commonly bind to a multispanning membrane protein UNC93B1, which is required for their proper localization and signaling (6–13). One missense mutation (H412R) of UNC93B1, found in a chemically mutagenized mouse strain called 3d, hinders binding of UNC93B1 with TLRs and prevents their exit from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (9–11). Consequently, signaling by all endosomal TLRs is abolished in the cells from 3d mice. In contrast, trafficking and signaling of the cell surface-localized TLRs such as TLR2 and TLR4 are not affected by the UNC93B1 mutation (9, 11).The proper localization of TLRs is critical not only for efficient signaling but also for preventing undesirable receptor hyperactivation (14, 15). Especially, sequestration of the nucleotide-sensing TLRs in endolysosomes significantly contributes to attenuating the immune stimulation by host-derived nucleotides abundant in the extracellular spaces (14). Structural discrimination of microbial vs. mammalian nucleotides is not straightforward, and a mutant TLR9 protein, engineered to artificially localize at the plasma membrane, responds to mammalian DNA as well as the CpG oligonucleotides mimicking bacterial DNA. As a result, mice expressing such mutant TLR9 succumb to systemic autoinflammation and die prematurely (15). Therefore, regulatory mechanisms for localization and trafficking of TLRs need to be tightly controlled.TLR5 recognizes flagellin, the major protein subunit of bacterial flagellum, and functions as a critical innate sensor for flagellated bacteria in all mucous organs (16–18). TLR5 plays an important role in intestinal homeostasis mediating the immune adaptation to symbiotic microflora as well as defense against pathogenic bacterial infection (19–21). In addition, systemic injection of flagellin confers protection against ionizing radiation in a TLR5-dependent manner, implying that TLR5 agonism might be clinically used for radioprotection (22). TLR5 overexpressed in the intestinal epithelial cells was exclusively found on the basolateral surface, accounting for the selective induction of proinflammatory cytokine by basolateral but not by apical flagellin (17). Also, we recently demonstrated that endogenous TLR5 is expressed at the cell surface of mouse neutrophils, monocytes, and dendritic cells (DCs) in a TLR-specific chaperone PRAT4A-dependnet manner (23). However, other regulatory mechanisms for the localization of TLR5 at the plasma membrane are unknown. Here, we show that UNC93B1 binds to TLR5, travels to the plasma membrane with the receptor, and is required for flagellin-induced signaling at the cell surface.     

Recruitment of TLR adapter TRIF to TLR4 signaling complex is mediated by the second helical region of TRIF TIR domain

Toll/IL-1R resistance (TIR) domain–containing adapter-inducing IFN-β (TRIF) is a Toll-like receptor (TLR) adapter that mediates MyD88-independent induction of type I interferons through activation of IFN regulatory factor 3 and NFκB. We have examined peptides derived from the TRIF TIR domain for ability to inhibit TLR4. In addition to a previously identified BB loop peptide (TF4), a peptide derived from putative helix B of TRIF TIR (TF5) strongly inhibits LPS-induced cytokine and MAPK activation in wild-type cells. TF5 failed to inhibit LPS-induced cytokine and kinase activation in TRIF-deficient immortalized bone-marrow–derived macrophage, but was fully inhibitory in MyD88 knockout cells. TF5 does not block macrophage activation induced by TLR2, TLR3, TLR9, or retinoic acid-inducible gene 1/melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 agonists. Immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that TF4 binds to TLR4 but not TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM), whereas TF5 binds to TRAM strongly and TLR4 to a lesser extent. Although TF5 prevented coimmunoprecipitation of TRIF with both TRAM and TLR4, site-directed mutagenesis of the TRIF B helix residues affected TRIF–TRAM coimmunoprecipitation selectively, as these mutations did not block TRIF–TLR4 association. These results suggest that the folded TRIF TIR domain associates with TRAM through the TRIF B helix region, but uses a different region for TRIF–TLR4 association. The B helix peptide TF5, however, can associate with either TRAM or TLR4. In a mouse model of TLR4-driven inflammation, TF5 decreased plasma cytokine levels and protected mice from a lethal LPS challenge. Our data identify TRIF sites that are important for interaction with TLR4 and TRAM, and demonstrate that TF5 is a potent TLR4 inhibitor with significant potential as a candidate therapeutic for human sepsis.Toll-like receptors (TLRs) initiate innate immune responses by recognizing specific pathogen-associated molecules; for example, TLR4 recognizes lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) of Gram-negative bacteria (1, 2). Ligand recognition induces dimerization of cytoplasmic Toll/IL-1R resistance (TIR) domains of two receptor molecules and causes recruitment of intracellular TIR domain-containing adapters. Four adapter proteins participate in TLR4 signaling: myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) (3), TIR domain-containing adapter protein, also known as MyD88-adapter-like (TIRAP–Mal) (4, 5), TIR domain–containing adapter-inducing IFN-β, also known as TLR adaptor molecule 1 (TRIF–TICAM-1) (6, 7), and TRIF-related adaptor molecule also known as TLR adaptor molecule 2 (TRAM–TICAM-2) (8, 9). TIRAP–Mal is important for MyD88 recruitment to the signaling complex located at the plasma membrane to initiate early NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation and induce “MyD88-dependent” proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β (4, 5, 10). TRAM is important for TRIF recruitment to the endosomally located TLR4 signaling complexes to activate IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and induce IRF3-dependent cytokines, such as IFN-β and RANTES (regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted) (8, 9, 11).A typical TIR domain consists of the central five stranded parallel β sheets (the strands are designated as βA–βE) surrounded by 5 α-helices (i.e., αA–αE) (12, 13). The TIRAP–Mal TIR domain has an atypical fold compared with other resolved mammalian TIR structures in that the position of its β-strand B is shifted by 12–18 amino acids toward the C terminus, so that TIRAP TIR does not have a helix B but has an unusually long AB loop (14, 15). Structures of the TIR domains of TLR4, TRIF, and TRAM have not been yet resolved. The TIR domain is a key structural feature present in all TLRs and TLR adapter proteins. TIR domains mediate transient homotypic or heterotypic protein interactions required for agonist-driven assembly of TLR signaling complexes (13, 16, 17). Multiple interactions of TIR domains of TLRs and TLR adapters are required to mediate adapter recruitment and stabilize initial complex (18–20). It has been proposed that TLR4 activation leads to formation of several compositionally distinct complexes. Kagan et al. proposed that TLR4 engages TIRAP–MyD88 and TRAM–TRIF sequentially at distinct cellular locations (11), thus implying that the two sets of adapters may compete for the same binding site at the TLR4 homodimer. However, it remains unclear how exactly the four adapters interact with each other and TLR4 to orchestrate TLR4 signaling.The presumed mechanism of signaling inhibition by a decoy peptide is that the peptide competes with its prototype protein for the prototype’s docking site and thereby prevents a protein–protein interaction required for signaling (19). In this study, we have examined cell-permeable decoy peptides derived from the TIR domain of TRIF. Two peptides, TF4 and TF5, from the second loop (BB loop) and the second helical region (helix B) of the TRIF TIR, respectively, potently inhibited LPS-induced activation of MAPKs and induction of MyD88-dependent and TRIF-dependent cytokines in wild-type macrophages. TF5 did not inhibit TLR4 signaling in TRIF^−/− immortalized bone-marrow–derived macrophages (iBMDMs) but did exhibit full activity in the MyD88^−/− cells. TF5 inhibits TLR4-driven macrophage signaling at a lower dose in vitro compared with TF4 and binds to both TRAM and TLR4, whereas TF4 targets TLR4 but not the TRAM TIR. In a mouse model of TLR4-driven inflammation, TF5 potently decreased the systemic cytokine levels induced in mice by a sublethal LPS dose, and dramatically improved survival of mice challenged with a lethal LPS dose.     

N terminus of ASPP2 binds to Ras and enhances Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK activation to promote oncogene-induced senescence

The ASPP2 (also known as 53BP2L) tumor suppressor is a proapoptotic member of a family of p53 binding proteins that functions in part by enhancing p53-dependent apoptosis via its C-terminal p53-binding domain. Mounting evidence also suggests that ASPP2 harbors important nonapoptotic p53-independent functions. Structural studies identify a small G protein Ras-association domain in the ASPP2 N terminus. Because Ras-induced senescence is a barrier to tumor formation in normal cells, we investigated whether ASPP2 could bind Ras and stimulate the protein kinase Raf/MEK/ERK signaling cascade. We now show that ASPP2 binds to Ras–GTP at the plasma membrane and stimulates Ras-induced signaling and pERK1/2 levels via promoting Ras–GTP loading, B-Raf/C-Raf dimerization, and C-Raf phosphorylation. These functions require the ASPP2 N terminus because BBP (also known as 53BP2S), an alternatively spliced ASPP2 isoform lacking the N terminus, was defective in binding Ras–GTP and stimulating Raf/MEK/ERK signaling. Decreased ASPP2 levels attenuated H-RasV12–induced senescence in normal human fibroblasts and neonatal human epidermal keratinocytes. Together, our results reveal a mechanism for ASPP2 tumor suppressor function via direct interaction with Ras–GTP to stimulate Ras-induced senescence in nontransformed human cells.ASPP2, also known as 53BP2L, is a tumor suppressor whose expression is altered in human cancers (1). Importantly, targeting of the ASPP2 allele in two different mouse models reveals that ASPP2 heterozygous mice are prone to spontaneous and γ-irradiation–induced tumors, which rigorously demonstrates the role of ASPP2 as a tumor suppressor (2, 3). ASPP2 binds p53 via the C-terminal ankyrin-repeat and SH3 domain (4–6), is damage-inducible, and can enhance damage-induced apoptosis in part through a p53-mediated pathway (1, 2, 7–10). However, it remains unclear what biologic pathways and mechanisms mediate ASPP2 tumor suppressor function (1). Indeed, accumulating evidence demonstrates that ASPP2 also mediates nonapoptotic p53-independent pathways (1, 3, 11–15).The induction of cellular senescence forms an important barrier to tumorigenesis in vivo (16–21). It is well known that oncogenic Ras signaling induces senescence in normal nontransformed cells to prevent tumor initiation and maintain complex growth arrest pathways (16, 18, 21–24). The level of oncogenic Ras activation influences its capacity to activate senescence; high levels of oncogenic H-RasV12 signaling leads to low grade tumors with senescence markers, which progress to invasive cancers upon senescence inactivation (25). Thus, tight control of Ras signaling is critical to ensure the proper biologic outcome in the correct cellular context (26–28).The ASPP2 C terminus is important for promoting p53-dependent apoptosis (7). The ASPP2 N terminus may also suppress cell growth (1, 7, 29–33). Alternative splicing can generate the ASPP2 N-terminal truncated protein BBP (also known as 53BP2S) that is less potent in suppressing cell growth (7, 34, 35). Although the ASPP2 C terminus mediates nuclear localization, full-length ASPP2 also localizes to the cytoplasm and plasma membrane to mediate extranuclear functions (7, 11, 12, 36). Structural studies of the ASPP2 N terminus reveal a β–Grasp ubiquitin-like fold as well as a potential Ras-binding (RB)/Ras-association (RA) domain (32). Moreover, ASPP2 can promote H-RasV12–induced senescence (13, 15). However, the molecular mechanism(s) of how ASPP2 directly promotes Ras signaling are complex and remain to be completely elucidated.Here, we explore the molecular mechanisms of how Ras-signaling is enhanced by ASPP2. We demonstrate that ASPP2: (i) binds Ras-GTP and stimulates Ras-induced ERK signaling via its N-terminal domain at the plasma membrane; (ii) enhances Ras-GTP loading and B-Raf/C-Raf dimerization and forms a ASPP2/Raf complex; (iii) stimulates Ras-induced C-Raf phosphorylation and activation; and (iv) potentiates H-RasV12–induced senescence in both primary human fibroblasts and neonatal human epidermal keratinocytes. These data provide mechanistic insight into ASPP2 function(s) and opens important avenues for investigation into its role as a tumor suppressor in human cancer.     

Structures and interface mapping of the TIR domain-containing adaptor molecules involved in interferon signaling

Homotypic and heterotypic interactions between Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domains in Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and downstream adaptors are essential to evoke innate immune responses. However, such oligomerization properties present intrinsic difficulties in structural studies of TIR domains. Here, using BB-loop mutations that disrupt homotypic interactions, we determined the structures of the monomeric TIR domain-containing adaptor molecule (TICAM)-1 and TICAM-2 TIR domains. Docking of the monomeric structures, together with yeast two hybrid-based mutagenesis assays, reveals that the homotypic interaction between TICAM-2 TIR is indispensable to present a scaffold for recruiting the monomeric moiety of the TICAM-1 TIR dimer. This result proposes a unique idea that oligomerization of upstream TIR domains is crucial for binding of downstream TIR domains. Furthermore, the bivalent nature of each TIR domain dimer can generate a large signaling complex under the activated TLRs, which would recruit downstream signaling molecules efficiently. This model is consistent with previous reports that BB-loop mutants completely abrogate downstream signaling.The extracellular domain of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) specifically binds lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) from Gram-negative bacteria, inducing dimerization and leading to the dimerization of cytosolic Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domains. This activated conformation of TLR4 recruits the TIR domain of a downstream adaptor molecule, TIR domain-containing adaptor molecule-2 (TICAM-2) [also known as TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM)], that subsequently recruits the TIR domain of another adaptor molecule, TIR domain-containing adaptor molecule-1 (TICAM-1) [also known as TIR domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF)] (1–3) at endosomes. Eventually this process activates IFN response factors and generates type-I interferons (IFNs) (4–7). Elucidation of the homotypic and heterotypic interactions between TICAM-1 and TICAM-2 is essential for understanding of TLR4-mediated type-I IFN generation (8).A large number of TIR domain structures, including receptors and adaptors, have been determined by X-ray crystallography and NMR. The receptors include TLR1 (9), TLR2 (10), and IL-1R accessory protein-like (IL-1RAPL) (11). Adaptors include myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88) (12) and MyD88 adaptor-like (Mal) (13, 14). In addition, AtTIR (15, 16) derived from Arabidopsis thaliana and PdTIR (17) from bacteria have been solved. Each of these TIR domain structures has a ferredoxin fold with five β-strands (βA–βE), five α-helices (αA–αE), and loops connecting β-strands and α-helices (9). Although homotypic interactions of the TIR domains have been proposed based on the crystal structures, most proposed models have small interacting surfaces, possibly due to crystal contacts. Recently, however, a crystal structure of the TLR10 TIR domain was reported that forms a homotypic dimer mediated by the loop connecting βB and αB (designated “BB-loop”) (18). Interestingly, BB-loop mutations in TLR4 were reported to be dominant-negative and abrogated downstream signaling (19). TICAM-1 and TICAM-2 harboring BB-loop mutations are also dominant-negative and unable to form homotypic interactions (1, 2), reinforcing the importance of BB-loop–mediated homotypic dimer formation in signal propagation.Despite extensive structural studies, it is not known why homotypic interactions are essential for downstream signaling (20–27). To address this issue, it is necessary to discriminate residues required for homotypic and those required for heterotypic interactions. Here, we first determine the structures of the monomeric BB-loop mutants of the TICAM-1 and TICAM-2 TIR domains using NMR. Then, based on the solution structures of the BB-loop mutants, coupled mutagenesis/yeast two-hybrid experiments, and restrained docking calculations, we show that the homotypic interaction of TICAM-2 TIR is essential to form a scaffold for recruiting the TICAM-1 TIR domain.     

TLR4-activated microglia require IFN-γ to induce severe neuronal dysfunction and death in situ

Microglia (tissue-resident macrophages) represent the main cell type of the innate immune system in the CNS; however, the mechanisms that control the activation of microglia are widely unknown. We systematically explored microglial activation and functional microglia–neuron interactions in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures, i.e., postnatal cortical tissue that lacks adaptive immunity. We applied electrophysiological recordings of local field potential and extracellular K⁺ concentration, immunohistochemistry, design-based stereology, morphometry, Sholl analysis, and biochemical analyses. We show that chronic activation with either bacterial lipopolysaccharide through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) or leukocyte cytokine IFN-γ induces reactive phenotypes in microglia associated with morphological changes, population expansion, CD11b and CD68 up-regulation, and proinflammatory cytokine (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6) and nitric oxide (NO) release. Notably, these reactive phenotypes only moderately alter intrinsic neuronal excitability and gamma oscillations (30–100 Hz), which emerge from precise synaptic communication of glutamatergic pyramidal cells and fast-spiking, parvalbumin-positive GABAergic interneurons, in local hippocampal networks. Short-term synaptic plasticity and extracellular potassium homeostasis during neural excitation, also reflecting astrocyte function, are unaffected. In contrast, the coactivation of TLR4 and IFN-γ receptors results in neuronal dysfunction and death, caused mainly by enhanced microglial inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and NO release, because iNOS inhibition is neuroprotective. Thus, activation of TLR4 in microglia in situ requires concomitant IFN-γ receptor signaling from peripheral immune cells, such as T helper type 1 and natural killer cells, to unleash neurotoxicity and inflammation-induced neurodegeneration. Our findings provide crucial mechanistic insight into the complex process of microglia activation, with relevance to several neurologic and psychiatric disorders.Microglia are tissue-resident macrophages in the CNS that become activated in most brain disorders, such as bacterial meningoencephalitis, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease (1, 2). Activation of microglia features changes in morphology and receptor expression, antigen presentation, cytokine release, migration, and phagocytosis, and it ranges from proinflammatory and potentially neurotoxic to anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective phenotypes (1, 3, 4). The mechanisms that control the transition of microglia to reactive phenotypes, including the impact on neuronal function, are mostly unknown, however (5–7).Sensing of microbial or modified endogenous ligands by microglia is mediated by innate pattern recognition receptors, such as scavenger receptors and Toll-like receptors (TLRs). A prime example is TLR4, which acts with CD14, MD-2, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein in recognizing LPS, a cell wall component of Gram-negative bacteria (8, 9). TLR4 is also central to microglial recognition of amyloid-β peptide, which is thought to be part of the inflammatory response in Alzheimer’s disease (7, 10).LPS has been widely used to study the molecular mechanisms of microglial activation in inflammatory neurodegeneration (1–3). In primary monocultures and microglia-neuron cultures, LPS exposure alone or in combination with IFN-γ for a “booster” triggers the massive release of proinflammatory and cytotoxic factors, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and nitric oxide (NO), finally resulting in neuronal death (8, 11–18). Similar effects were observed in vivo after intracerebral administration of LPS (19–21). These and other studies have contributed to the concept that microglial TLR4 activation with LPS (i.e., with a single pathogenic stimulus) is sufficient to induce neurodegeneration (22, 23); however, this concept is biologically risky, and has been questioned in some experimental works and reviews (2–4, 11, 24, 25).Most previous studies focused on two aspects of microglial TLR4 activation with LPS: (i) the properties of the reactive microglial phenotype(s) and (ii) the degree of neurodegeneration. For this purpose, either simple culture systems or in vivo models, in which interactions with leukocytes infiltrating from the blood are inevitable, have been used (1, 4). Thus, it is widely unknown how TLR4 and IFN-γ receptor signaling in microglia individually contribute to neurotoxicity and neurodegeneration in situ. This aspect is highly relevant for several neurologic and psychiatric disorders. Moreover, concomitant alterations in neuronal information processing (i.e., dysfunction in excitatory pyramidal cells and inhibitory GABAergic interneurons, including astrocytes) have been little explored (25–27).We rigorously addressed these fundamental questions in postnatal neuronal tissue (1, 4). To mimic microglial confrontation with LPS in situ and, notably, in the absence of infiltrating leukocytes, we used organotypic hippocampal slice cultures that feature highly preserved cytoarchitectures and complex neuronal network functions (5, 28). Microglial interaction with infiltrating T helper type 1 (Th1) cells and/or natural killer (NK) cells was mimicked by recombinant IFN-γ administration.     

Toll-like receptor 9 and 21 have different ligand recognition profiles and cooperatively mediate activity of CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides in zebrafish

CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-ODNs) are potent immune stimuli currently under investigation as antimicrobial agents for different species. Toll-like receptor (TLR) 9 and TLR21 are the cellular receptors of CpG-ODN in mammals and chickens, respectively. The avian genomes lack TLR9, whereas mammalian genomes lack TLR21. Although fish contain both of these genes, the biological functions of fish TLR9 and TLR21 have not been investigated previously. In this study, we comparatively investigated zebrafish TLR9 (zebTLR9) and TLR21 (zebTLR21). The two TLRs have similar expression profiles in zebrafish. They are expressed during early development stages and are preferentially expressed in innate immune function-related organs in adult fish. Results from cell-based activation assays indicate that these two zebrafish TLRs are functional, responding to CpG-ODN but not to other TLR ligands. zebTLR9 broadly recognized CpG-ODN with different CpG motifs, but CpG-ODN with GACGTT or AACGTT had better activity to this TLR. In contrast, zebTLR21 responded preferentially to CpG-ODN with GTCGTT motifs. The distinctive ligand recognition profiles of these two TLRs were determined by their ectodomains. Activation of these two TLRs by CpG-ODN occurred inside the cells and was modulated by UNC93B1. The biological functions of these two TLRs were further investigated. The CpG-ODNs that activate both zebTLR9 and zebTLR21 were more potent than others that activate only zebTLR9 in the activation of cytokine productions and were more bactericidal in zebrafish. These results suggest that zebTLR9 and zebTLR21 cooperatively mediate the antimicrobial activities of CpG-ODN. Overall, this study provides a molecular basis for the activities of CpG-ODN in fish.Bacterial and viral CpG-deoxynucleotides containing DNA (CpG-DNA) represent a type of pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) that activates immune cells and triggers host responses to microbial infections (1–3). Synthetic phosphorothioate-modified CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG-ODNs) mimic the functions of CpG-DNA and have been investigated as immune modulators for their adjuvant and antimicrobial activities in different species (4–7). In general, a CpG-ODN contains one or more copies of CpG-deoxynucleotides containing hexamer motifs (CpG motifs). A CpG-ODN’s immunostimulatory activities are dependent on its length, the number of CpG motifs, and the position, spacing, and surrounding bases of these CpG motifs.A CpG-ODN can have varying immunostimulatory activity in different species. This species-specific property is determined by the nucleotide context of the CpG motifs within the CpG-ODN. For example, CpG-ODNs containing a purine-purine-CG-pyrimidine-pyrimidine motif, such as a GACGTT motif, are more potent in activating murine cells compared with those containing a GTCGTT motif. In contrast, the GTCGTT motif containing CpG-ODN generates stronger immune responses in humans and various domestic animals (8, 9).Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern recognition receptors that play crucial roles in the initiation of host defense against microbial invasion by binding to PAMPs from the invading microorganisms. Ten TLRs (TLR1–TLR10) have been identified in human cells, and 13 have been identified in mouse cells. These TLRs detect diverse structures of PAMP from lipids, lipoproteins, glycans, and proteins to nucleic acids (10, 11). Of these, TLR9, a member of a subfamily of intracellular TLRs comprising TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9, is the cellular receptor that mediates the functions of CpG-ODN. The species-specific activity of a CpG-ODN is attributed to a species-specific ligand recognition of TLR9 (12–14). In mammals, cellular localization and activation of TLR9 are regulated by various accessory proteins, including UNC93 Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of B1 (UNC93B1) (15–17). Activation of TLR9 by CpG-ODN results in various immunologic effects, including up-regulation of MHC class I and II costimulatory molecules, activation of natural killer cells and B cells, and increased B-cell proliferation. In addition, TLR9 activation up-regulates T helper (Th) 1-polarized cytokine production, which promotes T-cell activation. Because of these potent immunostimulatory effects, CpG-ODNs are currently under investigation for various therapeutic applications, including antitumor and anti-infection therapies and as vaccine adjuvants (18–20).Similar to their actions in mammalian species, in chickens CpG-ODNs activate marked immune responses and provide protection from microbial infections (4, 5, 21). Nevertheless, analysis of the chicken and zebra finch genomes found that the TLR9 gene is not present in avian genomes. Of the 10 avian TLRs, TLR1La, TLR1Lb, TLR2a, TLR2b, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR7 are orthologs to mammalian TLRs, whereas TLR15 and TLR21 are not found in mammals (22). It was recently demonstrated that chicken TLR21 (chTLR21) is a functional homolog to mammalian TLR9 in terms of response to CpG-ODN stimulation (23, 24).The immunostimulatory effects of CpG-ODNs have been investigated in numerous fish species as well. In these species, much like in mammalian and avian species, CpG-ODNs up-regulate the activation of macrophages, induce proliferation of leukocytes, and stimulate cytokine expression. In addition, CpG-ODNs have been shown to protect fish against bacterial and viral infections. The molecular bases for CpG-ODN activation in fish remain unclear, however (5, 6). The genomic DNA of zebrafish has been sequenced and annotated, leading to the discovery of at least 14 different types of TLR in fish, including TLR9 and TLR21 (25, 26); however, whether these two TLRs are functional has not been investigated previously. In the present study, we comparatively investigated the expression, structural relationship, CpG-ODN interaction, regulation by UNC93B1, and immunologic functions of zebrafish TLR9 (zebTLR9) and TLR21 (zebTLR21) to explore the molecular basis of the immunostimulatory activities of CpG-ODN in fish.     

Dopamine release from transplanted neural stem cells in Parkinsonian rat striatum in vivo

Embryonic stem cell-based therapies exhibit great potential for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) because they can significantly rescue PD-like behaviors. However, whether the transplanted cells themselves release dopamine in vivo remains elusive. We and others have recently induced human embryonic stem cells into primitive neural stem cells (pNSCs) that are self-renewable for massive/transplantable production and can efficiently differentiate into dopamine-like neurons (pNSC–DAn) in culture. Here, we showed that after the striatal transplantation of pNSC–DAn, (i) pNSC–DAn retained tyrosine hydroxylase expression and reduced PD-like asymmetric rotation; (ii) depolarization-evoked dopamine release and reuptake were significantly rescued in the striatum both in vitro (brain slices) and in vivo, as determined jointly by microdialysis-based HPLC and electrochemical carbon fiber electrodes; and (iii) the rescued dopamine was released directly from the grafted pNSC–DAn (and not from injured original cells). Thus, pNSC–DAn grafts release and reuptake dopamine in the striatum in vivo and alleviate PD symptoms in rats, providing proof-of-concept for human clinical translation.Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the specific loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and their projecting axons, resulting in loss of dopamine (DA) release in the striatum (1). During the last two decades, cell-replacement therapy has proven, at least experimentally, to be a potential treatment for PD patients (2–7) and in animal models (8–15). The basic principle of cell therapy is to restore the DA release by transplanting new DA-like cells. Until recently, obtaining enough transplantable cells was a major bottleneck in the practicability of cell therapy for PD. One possible source is embryonic stem cells (ESCs), which can develop infinitely into self-renewable pluripotent cells with the potential to generate any type of cell, including DA neurons (DAns) (16, 17).Recently, several groups including us have introduced rapid and efficient ways to generate primitive neural stem cells (pNSCs) from human ESCs using small-molecule inhibitors under chemically defined conditions (12, 18, 19). These cells are nonpolarized neuroepithelia and retain plasticity upon treatment with neuronal developmental morphogens. Importantly, pNSCs differentiate into DAns (pNSC–DAn) with high efficiency (∼65%) after patterning by sonic hedgehog (SHH) and fibroblast growth factor 8 (FGF8) in vitro, providing an immediate and renewable source of DAns for PD treatment. Importantly, the striatal transplantation of human ESC-derived DA-like neurons, including pNSC–DAn, are able to relieve the motor defects in a PD rat model (11–13, 15, 19–23). Before attempting clinical translation of pNSC–DAn, however, there are two fundamental open questions. (i) Can pNSC–DAn functionally restore the striatal DA levels in vivo? (ii) What cells release the restored DA, pNSC–DAn themselves or resident neurons/cells repaired by the transplants?Regarding question 1, a recent study using nafion-coated carbon fiber electrodes (CFEs) reported that the amperometric current is rescued in vivo by ESC (pNSC–DAn-like) therapy (19). Both norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin are present in the striatum (24, 25). However, CFE amperometry/chronoamperometry alone cannot distinguish DA from other monoamines in vivo, such as NE and serotonin (Fig. S1) (see also refs. 26–28). Considering that the compounds released from grafted ESC-derived cells are unknown, the work of Kirkeby et al. was unable to determine whether DA or other monoamines are responsible for the restored amperometric signal. Thus, the key question of whether pNSC–DAn can rescue DA release needs to be reexamined for the identity of the restored amperometric signal in vivo.Regarding question 2, many studies have proposed that DA is probably released from the grafted cells (8, 12, 13, 20), whereas others have proposed that the grafted stem cells might restore striatal DA levels by rescuing injured original cells (29, 30). Thus, whether the grafted cells are actually capable of synthesizing and releasing DA in vivo must be investigated to determine the future cellular targets (residual cells versus pNSC–DAn) of treatment.To address these two mechanistic questions, advanced in vivo methods of DA identification and DA recording at high spatiotemporal resolution are required. Currently, microdialysis-based HPLC (HPLC) (31–33) and CFE amperometric recordings (34, 35) have been used independently by different laboratories to assess evoked DA release from the striatum in vivo. The major advantage of microdialysis-based HPLC is to identify the substances secreted in the cell-grafted striatum (33), but its spatiotemporal resolution is too low to distinguish the DA release site (residual cells or pNSC–DAn). In contrast, the major advantage of CFE-based amperometry is its very high temporal (ms) and spatial (μm) resolution, making it possible to distinguish the DA release site (residual cells or pNSC–DAn) in cultured cells, brain slices, and in vivo (34–39), but it is unable to distinguish between low-level endogenous oxidizable substances (DA versus serotonin and NE) in vivo.In the present study, we developed a challenging experimental paradigm of combining the two in vivo methods, microdialysis-based HPLC and CFE amperometry, to identify the evoked substance as DA and its release site as pNSC–DAn in the striatum of PD rats.     

TLR8 on dendritic cells and TLR9 on B cells restrain TLR7-mediated spontaneous autoimmunity in C57BL/6 mice

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease with diverse clinical presentations characterized by the presence of autoantibodies to nuclear components. Toll-like receptor (TLR)7, TLR8, and TLR9 sense microbial or endogenous nucleic acids and are implicated in the development of SLE. In mice TLR7-deficiency ameliorates SLE, but TLR8- or TLR9-deficiency exacerbates the disease because of increased TLR7 response. Thus, both TLR8 and TLR9 control TLR7 function, but whether TLR8 and TLR9 act in parallel or in series in the same or different cell types in controlling TLR7-mediated lupus remains unknown. Here, we reveal that double TLR8/9-deficient (TLR8/9^−/−) mice on the C57BL/6 background showed increased abnormalities characteristic of SLE, including splenomegaly, autoantibody production, frequencies of marginal zone and B1 B cells, and renal pathology compared with single TLR8^−/− or TLR9^−/− mice. On the cellular level, TLR8^−/− and TLR8/9^−/− dendritic cells were hyperesponsive to TLR7 ligand R848, but TLR9^−/− cells responded normally. Moreover, B cells from TLR9^−/− and TLR8/9^−/− mice were hyperesponsive to R848, but TLR8^−/− B cells were not. These results reveal that TLR8 and TLR9 have an additive effect on controlling TLR7 function and TLR7-mediated lupus; however, they act on different cell types. TLR8 controls TLR7 function on dendritic cells, and TLR9 restrains TLR7 response on B cells.Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex chronic autoimmune disease that arises spontaneously and is characterized by production of autoantibodies against self-nucleic acids and associated proteins (1). These autoantibodies bind self-nucleic acids released by dying cells and form immune complexes that accumulate in different parts of the body, leading to inflammation and tissue damage. The kidneys, skin, joints, lungs, serous membranes, as well as, the cardiovascular, nervous and musculoskeletal system become targets of inflammation at onset or during the course of the disease (2). The etiology of SLE is unknown, yet genetics, sex, infectious agents, environmental factors, and certain medications may play a role in the initiation of the disease by causing alterations in lymphoid signaling, antigen presentation, apoptosis, and clearance of immune complexes (3, 4).Toll-like receptors (TLRs) detect specific microbial components widely expressed by bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses, and initiate signaling pathways critical for induction of immune responses to infection (5). In contrast to the cell surface TLRs that detect bacterial cell wall components and viral particles, nucleic acid-sensing TLRs are localized mainly within endosomal compartments (6). Human endosomal TLRs consist of TLR3, which senses viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) (7), TLR7 and TLR8, which recognize viral single-stranded RNA (8–10), and TLR9, which detects bacterial and viral unmethylated CpG-containing DNA motifs (11). Interestingly, these endosomal TLRs are also able to detect self-nucleic acids (12–14). Although the endosomal localization isolate TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 away from self-nucleic acids in the extracellular space, still self-RNA or -DNA can become a potent trigger of cell activation when transported into TLR-containing endosomes, and such recognition can result in sterile inflammation and autoimmunity, including SLE (4, 15, 16). The connection of the endosomal TLRs with SLE originates mainly from mouse models, where TLR7 signaling seems to play a central role. TLR7 gene duplication is the cause for the development of lupus in mice bearing the Y chromosome-linked autoimmune accelerating (Yaa) locus that harbors 17 genes, including TLR7 (17, 18). In TLR7 transgenic mouse lines, a modest increase in TLR7 expression promotes autoreactive lymphocytes with RNA specificities and myeloid cell proliferation, but a substantial increase in TLR7 expression causes fatal acute inflammatory pathology and profound dendritic cell (DC) dysregulation (17). In addition, studies in several lupus-prone mouse strains have revealed that TLR7-deficiency ameliorates disease, but TLR9-deficiency exacerbates it. Interestingly, this controversy can be explained by the enhanced TLR7 activity in the TLR9-deficient lupus mice (19, 20). Although murine TLR8 does not seem so far to be able to sense a ligand (21, 22), we have shown previously that it plays an important biological role in controlling TLR7-mediated lupus. Indeed, TLR8-deficiency in mice (on the C57BL/6 background that is not prone to lupus) leads to lupus development because of increased TLR7 expression and signaling in DCs (23). Thus, tight control and regulation of TLR7 is pivotal for avoiding SLE and inflammatory pathology in mice. Recent studies in humans have also revealed that increased expression of TLR7 is associated with increased risk for SLE (24–26).Nucleic acid TLRs are expressed in many cell types, including DCs, plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) and B cells, all of which play a central role in SLE development. TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 signal through the adaptor molecule myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88), whereas TLR3 signals via the adaptor TRIF (Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β) (5). MyD88-deficiency abrogates most attributes of lupus in several lupus-prone mouse strains (19, 27–29). Moreover, deficiency for Unc93B1, a multipass transmembrane protein that controls trafficking of TLRs from the endoplasmic reticulum to endolysosomes and is required for nucleic acid-sensing TLR function (30), also abrogates many clinical parameters of disease in mouse lupus strains, suggesting that endosomal TLRs are critical in this disease (31). Interestingly, TLR9 competes with TLR7 for Unc93B1-dependent trafficking and predominates over TLR7 (32). TLR9 predominance is reversed to TLR7 by a D34A mutation in Unc93B1 and mice that carry this mutation show TLR7-dependent, systemic lethal inflammation (32).Thus, in mice both TLR8 and TLR9 control TLR7-mediated lupus, but it is unknown if these TLRs act in parallel or in series in the same or different cell types and if they have an additive effect or not in controlling TLR7. To address these issues, we generated double TLR8/TLR9-deficient (TLR8/9^−/−) mice and analyzed and compared the lupus phenotype in TLR8^−/−, TLR9^−/−, and TLR8/9^−/− mice. Our data revealed that TLR8/9^−/− mice have increased abnormalities characteristic of SLE and that both TLR8 and TLR9 keep TLR7-mediated lupus under control, but they act in different cell types. On DCs TLR7 function is ruled by TLR8, whereas on B cells TLR7 is mastered by TLR9.     

Reconstitution of long and short patch mismatch repair reactions using Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins

A problem in understanding eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair (MMR) mechanisms is linking insights into MMR mechanisms from genetics and cell-biology studies with those from biochemical studies of MMR proteins and reconstituted MMR reactions. This type of analysis has proven difficult because reconstitution approaches have been most successful for human MMR whereas analysis of MMR in vivo has been most advanced in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we describe the reconstitution of MMR reactions using purified S. cerevisiae proteins and mispair-containing DNA substrates. A mixture of MutS homolog 2 (Msh2)–MutS homolog 6, Exonuclease 1, replication protein A, replication factor C-Δ1N, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and DNA polymerase δ was found to repair substrates containing TG, CC, +1 (+T), +2 (+GC), and +4 (+ACGA) mispairs and either a 5′ or 3′ strand interruption with different efficiencies. The Msh2–MutS homolog 3 mispair recognition protein could substitute for the Msh2–Msh6 mispair recognition protein and showed a different specificity of repair of the different mispairs whereas addition of MutL homolog 1–postmeiotic segregation 1 had no affect on MMR. Repair was catalytic, with as many as 11 substrates repaired per molecule of Exo1. Repair of the substrates containing either a 5′ or 3′ strand interruption occurred by mispair binding-dependent 5′ excision and subsequent resynthesis with excision tracts of up to ∼2.9 kb occurring during the repair of the substrate with a 3′ strand interruption. The availability of this reconstituted MMR reaction now makes possible detailed biochemical studies of the wealth of mutations identified that affect S. cerevisiae MMR.DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a critical DNA repair pathway that is coupled to DNA replication in eukaryotes where it corrects misincorporation errors made during DNA replication (1–9). This pathway prevents mutations and acts to prevent the development of cancer (10, 11). MMR also contributes to gene conversion by repairing mispaired bases that occur during the formation of recombination intermediates (3, 4, 12). Finally, MMR acts to suppress recombination between divergent but homologous DNA sequences, thereby preventing the formation of genome rearrangements that can result from nonallelic homologous recombination (4, 13–15).Our knowledge of the mechanism of eukaryotic MMR comes from several general lines of investigation (3–9). Studies of bacterial MMR have provided a basic mechanistic framework for comparative studies (5). Genetic and cell-biology studies, primarily in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, have identified eukaryotic MMR genes, provided models for how their gene products define MMR pathways, and elucidated some of the details of how MMR pathways interact with replication (1–4). Reconstitution studies, primarily in human systems, have identified some of the catalytic features of eukaryotic MMR (7–9, 16, 17). Biochemical and structural studies of S. cerevisiae and human MMR proteins have provided information about the function of individual MMR proteins (6–9).In eukaryotic MMR, mispairs are bound by MutS homolog 2 (Msh2)–MutS homolog 6 (Msh6) and Msh2–MutS homolog 3 (Msh3), two partially redundant complexes of MutS-related proteins (3, 4, 18, 19). These complexes recruit a MutL-related complex, called MutL homoloh 1 (Mlh1)–postmeiotic segregation 1 (Pms1) in S. cerevisiae and Mlh1–postmeiotic segregation 2 (Pms2) in human and mouse (3, 4, 20–23). The Mlh1–Pms1/Pms2 complex has an endonuclease activity suggested to play a role in the initiation of the excision step of MMR (24, 25). Downstream of mismatch recognition is a mispair excision step that can be catalyzed by Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) (26–28); however, defects in both S. cerevisiae and mouse Exo1 result in only a partial MMR deficiency, suggesting the existence of additional excision mechanisms (26, 27, 29). DNA polymerase δ, the single-strand DNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA), the sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and the clamp loader replication factor C (RFC) are also required for MMR at different steps, including activation of Mlh1–Pms1/Pms2, stimulation of Exo1, potentially in Exo1-independent mispair excision, and in the gap-filling resynthesis steps of MMR (3, 16, 17, 24, 27, 30–36). Although much is known about these core MMR proteins, it is not well understood how eukaryotic MMR is coupled to DNA replication (1, 2), how excision is targeted to the newly replicated strand (1, 25, 37–39), or how different MMR mechanisms such as Exo1-dependent and -independent subpathways are selected or how many such subpathways exist (1, 24, 27, 29).S. cerevisiae has provided a number of tools for studying MMR, including forward genetic screens for mutations affecting MMR, including dominant and separation-of-function mutations, the ability to evaluate structure-based mutations in vivo, cell biological tools for visualizing and analyzing MMR proteins in vivo, and overproduction of individual MMR proteins for biochemical analysis. However, linking these tools with biochemical systems that catalyze MMR reactions in vitro for mechanistic studies has not yet been possible. Here, we describe the development of MMR reactions reconstituted using purified proteins for the analysis of MMR mechanisms.