Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training improves pain-related and balance outcomes in working-age patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundProprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training and general trunk exercises have been applied to treat chronic low back pain patients. However, there is currently little study to support the use of one treated intervention over the other to improve clinical outcomes and balance ability.ObjectiveTo examine the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training on pain intensity, disability and static balance ability in working-age patients with chronic low back pain.MethodsForty-four chronic low back pain participants aged 18–50 years were randomized either to a three-week proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training or to a control group receiving general trunk exercises. Pain intensity, disability and static balance ability were measured before and after the three-week intervention.ResultsThe proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training intervention showed a statistically significantly greater reduction in pain intensity and improved functional disability than the controls at three weeks (between-group difference: pain intensity 1.22 score, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.88, p < 0.001; disability 2.23 score, 95% CI: 1.22 to 3.24, p < 0.001. The proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training intervention also had statistically better parameters of static balance ability than the control group (between-group difference: ellipse sway area during eye opened and closed conditions 129.09 mm², 95% CI: 64.93 to 175.25, p < 0.01 and 336.27 mm², 95% CI: 109.67 to 562.87, p < 0.05, respectively; the centre of pressure velocity during eye opened and eye closed conditions 6.68 mm/s, 95% CI: 4.41 to 8.95, p < 0.01 and 6.77 mm/s, 95% CI: 4.01 to 9.54, p < 0.01, respectively).ConclusionThe three-week proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training provides better pain intensity, disability and static balance ability than general trunk exercises for working-age individuals with chronic low back pain but the effects do not reach the clinical meaningful level. The therapists should consider carefully when making recommendations regarding these interventions, taking into account effectiveness and costs.     

The short-term effects of balneotherapy on pain,disability and fatigue in patients with chronic low back pain treated with physical therapy: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare whether there are positive effects of balneotherapy(BT) on pain, quality of life and disability of individuals receiving physical therapy(PT) for chronic low back pain and to examine the effect of body mass index(BMI) on treatment.Materials and methodThis prospective, controlled, single blind study was conducted. Patients were randomized into two groups through a simple randomization in a 1:1 ratio. The clinician and biostatistics expert were blinded. PT group was applied PT, BT + PT group was applied PT + BT. All patients were included in the study for 3 weeks (total of 15 sessions, 5 days per week). All patients applied hot pack, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and ultrasound. Patients in the BT + PT group applied BT in thermo mineralized water pool (20 min at 38−40 °C). Assessments were made using Pain-Visual Analog Scale(VAS), EQ-5D-3 L Scale(EQ5), EQ-VAS, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue(FACIT-F), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire(RMDQ) and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale(QBPDS) at the beginning (W0) and end (W3) of treatment. While performing statistical analysis, patients were divided into 3 categories of BMI1(18.5–24.9 kg/m²), BMI2 (25.0–29.9 kg/m²) and BMI3(≥30.0 kg/m²).Results270 patients were randomized. 129 patients in PT group and 133 patients in PT + BT group completed the study. In the BT + PT group, there were increases in the EQ5 and EQ-VAS variables and decreases in all other variables compared to the PT group which were found to be statistically significant (for QBPDS p < 0.05, the others p < 0.01). The differences in all variables W0 and W3 were at least half reductions and increases which were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.01). In terms of BMI, there were significant differences for all groups, especially BMI3 had higher means for all variables apart from EQ5 and EQ-VAS than the other two categories. BMI1 was the BMI category with highest means for EQ5 and EQ-VAS. The Group × Time interaction was found to be statistically significant for Pain-VAS, EQ5, EQ-VAS, FACIT-F, QBPDS and RMDQ(p < 0.01). For Pain-VAS, the effect of the Group × Time × BMI interaction was found to be statistically significant(p < 0.05).ConclusionBT plus PT was more effective than PT. BT may have positive contributions to reducing pain, functionality of patients, quality of life, fatigue and disability status.     

Effectiveness of graded activity versus physiotherapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: midterm follow up results of a randomized controlled trial

Background

Low back pain (LBP) is a major health and economic problem worldwide. Graded activity and physiotherapy are commonly used interventions for nonspecific low back pain. However, there is currently little evidence to support the use of one intervention over the other in the medium-term.

Effectiveness of focused meditation for patients with chronic low back pain—A randomized controlled clinical trial

ObjectivesWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an 8-week meditation program (focused meditation) in patients with chronic low-back pain.DesignA randomized clinical trial was conducted on 68 patients (55 years;75% female) with chronic low-back pain who scored >40 mm on a 100 mm Visual-Analogue-Scale. Subjects were allocated to an 8-week meditation program (focused meditation) with weekly 75 min classes or to a self-care exercise program with a wait-list offer for meditation. Both groups were instructed to practice at home. Outcomes were assessed baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change in mean back pain at rest after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included function, pain-related bothersomeness, perceived stress, quality-of-life (QOL), and psychological outcomes.ResultsTwelve (meditation) and 4 (exercise) patients were lost to follow-up. The primary outcome, pain at rest after 8 weeks, was reduced from 59.3 ± 13.9 mm to 40.8 ± 21.8 mm with meditation vs. 52.9 ± 11.8 mm to 37.3 ± 18.2 mm with exercise (adjusted group difference: −1.4 (95%CI:11.6;8.8;p = n.s.) Perceived stress was significantly more reduced with meditation (p = 0.011). No significant treatment effects were found for other secondary outcomes as pain-related bothersomeness, function, quality-of-life and psychological scores, although the meditation group consistently showed non-significant better improvements compared to the exercise group.ConclusionsFocused meditation and self-care exercise lead to comparable, symptomatic improvements in patients with chronic low back pain. Future studies should include longer-term follow-ups and develop guided meditation programs to support compliance.     

Analyzing chronic low back pain: the relative contribution of pain coping strategies

Sixty-two chronic low back pain patients were administered the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) to assess the frequency of use and perceived effectiveness of a variety of cognitive and behavioral pain coping strategies. Analysis of individual variables revealed that CSQ factors, gender, physical examination findings, and chronicity of pain had significant effects on one or more of a series of pain, psychological distress or behavioral measures. To assess the relative contribution of each of these variables hierarchical stepwise regression analyses were carried out. These analyses revealed that the Helplessness factor of the CSQ explained 50% of the variance in psychological distress (Global Severity Index of the SCL-90R), and 46% of the variance in depression (Beck Depression Inventory). Patients scoring high on this CSQ factor had significantly higher levels of psychological distress. None of the demographic or medical status variables explained a significant proportion of variance in the psychological distress measures. The Diverting Attention and Praying factor of the CSQ explained a moderate (9%), but significant amount of variance in pain report. Patients scoring high on this factor had higher scores on the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Coping strategies were not strongly related to pain behavior measures such as guarding or uptime. A consideration of pain coping strategies may allow one to design pain coping skills training interventions so as to fit the needs of the individual low back pain patient.     

No immediate analgesic effect of diadynamic current in patients with nonspecific low back pain in comparison to TENS

Background and design

Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) has major socioeconomic as well as personal impact in many industrialized and developing countries. Physiotherapy is a common intervention for this group of patients and using anti-pain physical modalities is a common part of the physical therapy. In a randomized controlled trial we investigated the immediate effect of the Diadynamic current in comparison to TENS on reducing the pain in patients suffering from non specific chronic low back pain.

Effect of slump stretching versus lumbar mobilization with exercise in subjects with non-radicular low back pain: a randomized clinical trial

Previous case reports, case series, and pilot studies have suggested that slump stretching may enhance the effects of spinal mobilization and stabilization exercises in patients with non-radicular low back pain (NRLBP). The purpose of this trial was to determine if slump stretching results in improvements in pain, disability, and fear and avoidance beliefs in patients with NRLBP with neural mechanosensitivity. Sixty patients, 18–60 years of age presenting with NRLBP with symptom duration >3 months, were randomized into one of two, 3-week physical therapy programs. Group one received lumbar spinal mobilization with stabilization exercises while group two received slump stretching in addition to lumbar spinal mobilization with exercise. Outcomes including the modified Oswestry disability index (ODI), numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), and the fear–avoidance belief questionnaire (FABQ) were collected at baseline, and at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 6. A doubly multivariate analysis of variance revealed a significant group–time interaction for ODI, NPRS, and FABQ. There were large within-group changes for all outcomes with P<0·01 and large between-group differences at weeks 3 and 6 for the ODI and weeks 1, 2, 3, and 6 for the NPRS and FABQ at P<0·01. A linear mixed-effect model comparing the composite slopes of the improvement lines revealed significant differences favoring the slump stretching group at P<0·01. The findings of the present study further support the use of slump stretching with spinal mobilization and stabilization exercises when treating NRLBP.     

The concept of consequences of disease in patients with low back pain

This paper is based on 212 patients operated on 1 year earlier for lumbar disc herniation. We should have liked to find severity scales for impairment in the ICIDH. The severity scale for disability was not practical for use with low back pain patients. Assignment to the different scale categories of occupation handicap was relatively easy. As a theoretical model of the process of an individual's illness we found it helpful to use that proposed by Purola. The ICIDH concepts seem like a bridge between the medical (internal system) and social connexions (external system) of illness.

Résumé Ce document se fonde sur 212 patients ayant été opérés l an avant d'une hernie discale lombaire. Nous aurions aimé trouver des échelles de gravité de la déficience dans l'ICIDH. L'échelle de gravité de l'incapacité n'est pas d'application pratique pour les patients souffrant de douleurs du bas du dos. L'affectation aux différentes catégories d'échelle de handicap professionnel est relativement facile. Comme modèle théorique du processus de maladie d'un individu, nous avons trouvé utile le modèle proposé par Purola. Les concepts ICIDH semblent représenter une sorte de pont entre connections médicales (système interne) et sociales (système externe) d'une maladie.

Zusammenfassung Diese Untersuchung beruht auf 212 Patienten, die um 1 Jahr früher wegen Lumbalbandscheibenvorfall operiert wurden. Wir waren bestrebt, schwierige Fälle für Verschlechterung in der ICIDH zu finden. Der Grad der Behinderung eignete sich nicht bei Patienten mit Kreuzschmerzen. Die Unterteilung der verschiedenen, berufsbedingten Behinderungen war relativ einfach. Das theoretische Modell von Purola war besonders nützlich für die Krankheitsentwicklung eines Patienten. Das ICIDH-Konzept erscheint wie eine Brücke zwischen medizinischen (internes System) und sozialen (externes System) Zusammenhängen von Krankheiten.

Resumen Esta comunicación está basada sobre 212 pacientes operados l año antes de prolapso de disco lumbar. Nos hubiera agradado encontrar escalas de gravedad de impedimento en ICIDH. La escala de gravedad para incapacitación no se consideró práctica para su uso con personas que padecen de dolor lumbar. La asignación a las distintas categorías de la escala de minusvalidez ocupacional resultó relativamente fácil. Encontramos de utilidad el empleo como modelo teórico del proceso de la enfermedad de un individuo el propuesto por Purola. Los conceptos del ICIDH parecen servir de puente entre las conexiones médicas (sistema interno) y las sociales (sistcma externo) de la enfermedad.     

Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on nonspecific low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundFurther research on pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) effects on the different conditions of low back pain was warranted due to lack of studies in this area.ObjectivesTo investigate the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy with 50 Hz frequency, with low intensity of 20 Gauss compared to conventional non-invasive treatment modalities in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.MethodsDesign – A prospective, randomized, patient-blinded, controlled trial. Setting – The study was conducted at Outpatient Physiotherapy Clinic in Cairo, Egypt. The study was conducted between May 2015 and September 2016. Participants – Fifty participants with non-specific low back pain enrolled into experimental and control groups. Interventions – The experimental group received the Conventional physical therapy Protocol as well as magnetic field, while the control group received the same Conventional physical therapy and sham electromagnetic field. Both groups received 12 sessions over 4 weeks’ period. Outcome measures – Primary outcome measures was pain intensity while the secondary outcome measures were disability and lumbar range of motion – ROM. There were no adverse events occurred during the study.ResultsFifty participants with non-specific low back pain (control group n = 25; experimental group n = 25) were randomized. There were significant between-group differences in pain scores (mean difference – MD 1.52; 95%CI −0.34 to 3.35), function disability (MD 8.14; 95%CI 6.5 to 9.96), Range of Motion (ROM) of lumbar flexion (MD −1.27; 95%CI −1.09 to −1.45), ROM of lumbar extension (MD −1.1; 95%CI −0.97 to −1.23), ROM of lumbar right side bending (MD 8.2; 95%CI 6.56 to 9.84) and ROM of lumbar left side bending (MD 10.4; 95%CI 8.81 to 11.99) in favour of the experimental group.ConclusionAdding pulsed electromagnetic field to Conventional physical therapy Protocol yields superior clinical improvement in pain, functional disability, and lumbar ROM in patients with non-specific low back pain than Conventional physical therapy alone.     

Effects of Qigong practice in office workers with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized control trial

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of Qigong practice, Guan Yin Zi Zai Gong level 1, compared with a waiting list control group among office workers with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP).MethodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted at offices in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Seventy-two office workers with CNLBP were screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria (age 20–40 years; sitting period more than 4 h per day) and were allocated randomly into two groups: the Qigong and waiting list groups (n = 36 each). The participants in the Qigong group took a Qigong practice class (Guan Yin Zi Zai Gong level 1) for one hour per week for six weeks at their workstation. The participants were encouraged to conduct the Qigong exercise at home every day. The waiting list group received general advice regarding low back pain management. The primary outcomes were pain intensity, measured by the visual analog scale, and back functional disability, measured by the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were back range of motion, core stability performance index, heart rate, respiratory rate, the Srithanya Stress Scale (ST-5), and the global perceived effect (GPE) questionnaire.ResultsCompared to the baseline, participants in the Qigong group experienced significantly decreased pain intensity and back functional disability. No statistically significant difference in these parameters was found in the waiting list group. Comparing the two groups, Qigong exercise significantly improved pain intensity, back functional impairment, range of motion, core muscle strength, heart rate, respiratory rate, and mental status. The Qigong group also had a significantly higher global outcome satisfaction than the waiting list group.ConclusionQigong practice is an option for treatment of CNLBP in office workers.     

Increasing days at work using function-centered rehabilitation in nonacute nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of function-centered compared with pain-centered inpatient rehabilitation in patients whose absence from work is due to chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Single-blinded randomized controlled trial with follow-up assessments immediately after treatment and at 3 months. SETTING: Center for work rehabilitation in Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with more than 6 weeks of work absence due to chronic nonspecific LBP (N=174; 137 men, 37 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 42+/-8 y; mean sick leave before study, 6.5 mo). INTERVENTIONS: Function-centered treatment (FCT) (4h/d, 6d/wk, for 3 wk) consisted of work simulation, strength, endurance, and cardiovascular training. Pain-centered treatment (PCT) (2.5h/d, 6d/wk, for 3 wk) used a mini back school, individually selected passive and active mobilization, stretching, and low-intensity strength training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of days at work in 3 months after treatment, self-efficacy, lifting capacity, pain, mobility, strength, and global perceived effect. Effect sizes (ESs) (Cohen d ) were defined as small (ES range, 0.2-0.5), moderate (ES range, 0.5-0.8), and large (ES, >0.8). RESULTS: Groups were comparable at baseline. Moderate ESs for the FCT group versus PCT group were found for days at work (25.9 d vs 15.8d, ES=.36, P =.029), self-efficacy (5.9 points vs -7.4 points, ES=.55, P =.003), and lifting capacity (2.3 kg vs 0.2 kg, ES=.54, P =.004). CONCLUSIONS: Function-centered rehabilitation increases the number of work days, self-efficacy, and lifting capacity in patients with nonacute nonspecific LBP.     

The reliability of clinical judgments and criteria associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back pain disorders: a preliminary reliability study

Mechanisms-based classifications of pain have been advocated for their potential to aid understanding of clinical presentations of pain and improve clinical outcomes. However, the reliability of mechanisms-based classifications of pain and the clinical criteria upon which such classifications are based are not known. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of clinical judgments associated with: (i) mechanisms-based classifications of pain; and (ii) the identification and interpretation of individual symptoms and signs from a Delphi-derived expert consensus list of clinical criteria associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back (±leg) pain disorders. The inter- and intra-examiner reliability of an examination protocol performed by two physiotherapists on two separate cohorts of 40 patients was assessed. Data were analysed using kappa and percentage of agreement values. Inter- and intra-examiner agreement associated with clinicians’ mechanisms-based classifications of low back (±leg) pain was ‘substantial’ (kappa  = 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57–0.96; % agreement  = 87.5) and ‘almost perfect’ (kappa  = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.92–1.00; % agreement = 92.5), respectively. Sixty-eight and 95% of items on the clinical criteria checklist demonstrated clinically acceptable (kappa ⩾ 0.61 or % agreement ⩾ 80%) inter- and intra-examiner reliability, respectively. The results of this study provide preliminary evidence supporting the reliability of clinical judgments associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back (±leg) pain disorders. The reliability of mechanisms-based classifications of pain should be investigated using larger samples of patients and multiple independent examiners.     

Immediate effects of Pilates based therapeutic exercise on postural control of young individuals with non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesLow back pain affects the person's ability to keep balance, especially in challenging conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the immediate effects of Pilates exercises on postural sway and dynamic balance of young individuals with non-specific low back pain.DesignControlled laboratory design.Settings and main outcome measuresForty-six participants with non-specific low back pain were randomized to a Pilates (n = 23, 10 males; age: 21.8 ± 3.2 years) and a control group (n = 23, 9 males; age: 22.8 ± 3.6 years). Postural sway was assessed with a force platform and dynamic balance with the Star Excursion Balance Test, before and after the intervention or rest period. To assess postural sway, participants stood still on an unstable surface set on the force plate for 90s, with eyes closed.InterventionThe intervention lasted 20 min and consisted on four Pilates exercises: single leg stretch (level 1), pelvic press (level 1), swimming (level 1) and kneeling opposite arm and leg reach.ResultsAt baseline, no differences were found between groups. The Pilates group improved in all the postural sway values (area of CoP: 11.5 ± 3.4 to 9.7 ± 2.7 cm², p = 0.002 and CoP velocity: 2.8 ± 0.6 to 2.3 ± 0.5 cm/s, p < 0.001) and in the Star Excursion Balance Test. Control group only improved in CoP velocity, however, this improvement was significantly inferior compared to the Pilates group.ConclusionsPilates exercises immediately improved postural sway and dynamic balance in young adults with non-specific low back pain.     

Isolated lumbar extensor strengthening versus regular physical therapy in an army working population with nonacute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Helmhout PH, Harts CC, Viechtbauer W, Staal JB, de Bie RA. Isolated lumbar extensor strengthening versus regular physical therapy in an army working population with nonacute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of specific lumbar extensor training compared with regular physical therapy (PT) in workers with nonspecific nonacute low back pain (LBP).

Design

A multicenter randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.

Setting

PT department in (military primary care) health centers.

Participants

Predominantly male soldiers (N=129) with 4 weeks or more of low back complaints who were referred by the health center's general practitioner for PT (mean age, 35.9±10.8y; range, 20-56y), of whom 127 randomized participants were included in the analyses. One patient withdrew because of adverse effects during treatment.

Interventions

Participants were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment programs: (1) a 10-week device-supported isolated lumbar extension training, twice a week, or (2) regular PT, mainly consisting of exercise therapy and aerobic activities.

Main Outcome Measures

Functional status (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Patient-Specific Functional Scale) and global perceived effect were assessed in the short term (5wk, 10wk) and long term (6mo, 12mo).

Results

Both groups showed a favorable development in main outcomes over time: short-term improvements (after 10 weeks of treatment) remained stable or even slightly increased throughout the 12-month follow-up. No significant differences between the 2 groups were shown for any of the outcome measures, at any time.

Conclusions

Consistent with prior evidence, specific back strengthening does not seem to offer incremental benefits in LBP management compared with regular PT care that mainly consists of general exercise therapy. (ISRCTN identifier ISRCTN19334317.)     

Yoga and pilates in the management of low back pain

Many interventions for the management of low back pain exist, however most have modest efficacy at best, and there are few with clearly demonstrated benefits once pain becomes chronic. Therapeutic exercise, on the other hand, does appear to have significant benefits for managing patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) in terms of decreasing pain and improving function. In addition, because chronic pain is complex and does not fit a simple model, there have also been numerous trials investigating and demonstrating the efficacy of multidisciplinary pain programs for CLBP. It follows that interventions that treat more than one aspect of LBP would have significant benefits for this patient population. Yoga and Pilates which have, both been gaining in popularity over the last decade are two mind–body exercise interventions that address both the physical and mental aspects of pain with core strengthening, flexibility, and relaxation. There has been a slow evolution of these nontraditional exercise regimens into treatment paradigms for LBP, although few studies examining their effects have been published. The following article will focus on the scientific and theoretical basis of using yoga and Pilates in the management of CLBP.     

Classifying subgroups of chronic low back pain patients based on lifting patterns

Slaboda JC, Boston JR, Rudy TE, Lieber SJ. Classifying subgroups of chronic low back pain patients based on lifting patterns.

Objective

To compare self-reported measures of chronic lower back pain (CLBP) patients who were assigned to 2 subgroups based on their lifting patterns performed during a repetitive lifting task.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Research laboratory

Participants

CLBP subjects (n=81) and pain-free controls (n=53).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Measures of lifting patterns and self-reported disability, pain, and psychosocial aspects.

Results

Two CLBP subgroups were found: 1 group that lifts similarly to control subjects (n=35) and 1 group that lifts very differently from controls (n=46). The CLBP group that lifted differently than controls reported higher pain intensity (P=.005), higher pain severity (P=.025), and lower self-efficacy (P=.013) than the CLBP group that lifted similarly to controls.

Conclusions

A classification system based on lifting patterns identified 2 CLBP subgroups that were significantly different on lifting and self-reported measures, indicating the importance of physical functioning measures in classification systems.     

Comparison of a functional restoration program with active individual physical therapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term outcomes of active individual therapy (AIT) with those of a functional restoration program (FRP). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled study. SETTING: Two rehabilitation centers and private ambulatory physiotherapy facilities. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-two adults with chronic low back pain. Fifty-one percent of patients on sick leave or out of work (mean duration, 180d in the 2y before treatment). INTERVENTIONS: For 5 weeks, FRP (at 25h/wk) or AIT (at 3h/wk). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trunk flexibility, back flexor, and extensor endurance (Ito and Sorensen tests), general endurance, pain intensity, Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) scores, daily activities, anxiety depression, social interest, and work and leisure activities, and self-reported improvement (work ability, resumption of sport and leisure activities). RESULTS: All outcome measures improved after treatment except endurance in AIT. There was no between-group difference for pain intensity or DPQ daily activities or work and leisure activities scores. Better results were observed in FRP for all other outcome measures. There was a significant effect of treatment and the initial value for the gain of the Sorensen score with a treatment or initial value interaction; a significant effect of treatment and initial value on the gains of Ito, endurance, and DPQ social interest and anxiety depression scores, with no treatment or initial value interaction; and a significant effect of initial value but not treatment for the gains of DPQ daily activities and work and leisure activities scores. CONCLUSIONS: Low-cost ambulatory AIT is effective. The main advantage of FRP is improved endurance. We speculate that this may be linked to better self-reported work ability and more frequent resumption of sports and leisure activities.     

A randomized clinical trial comparing non-thrust manipulation with segmental and distal dry needling on pain,disability, and rate of recovery for patients with non-specific low back pain

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the within and between-group effects of segmental and distal dry needling (DN) without needle manipulation to a semi-standardized non-thrust manipulation (NTM) targeting the symptomatic spinal level for patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).

Methods: Sixty-five patients with NSLBP were randomized to receive either DN (n = 30) or NTM (n = 35) for six sessions over 3 weeks. Outcomes collected included the oswestry disability index (ODI), patient specific functional scale (PSFS), numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), and pain pressure thresholds (PPT). At discharge, patients perceived recovery was assessed.

Results: A two-way mixed model ANOVA demonstrated that there was no group*time interaction for PSFS (p = 0.26), ODI (p = 0.57), NPRS (p = 0.69), and PPT (p = 0.51). There was significant within group effects for PSFS (3.1 [2.4, 3.8], p = 0.018), ODI (14.5% [10.0%, 19.0%], p = 0.015), NPRS (2.2 [1.5, 2.8], p = 0.009), but not for PPT (3.3 [0.5, 6.0], p = 0.20).

Discussion: The between-group effects were neither clinically nor statistically significant. The within group effects were both significant and exceeded the reported minimum clinically important differences for the outcomes tools except the PPT. DN and NTM produced comparable outcomes in this sample of patients with NSLBP.

Level of evidence: 1b     

Superficial temperature and pain tolerance in patients with chronic low back pain

IntroductionLow back pain is a common and very prevalent disease and can impose limitations that negatively impact patients. The objective of this study was to verify and compare the association between lumbar superficial temperature and pressure pain tolerance thresholds in individuals with chronic nonspecific low back pain and healthy controls.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional observational study involving 38 individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain and 19 healthy controls. Volunteers underwent thermographic (infrared sensor), pain perception (visual analog scale), and pressure pain tolerance thresholds (algometry) evaluations in the right and left paravertebral muscles and L4-L5 ligament.ResultsA lower tolerance to pressure pain was found in patients compared to controls at all evaluated sites (p ≤ 0.003). Superficial temperature was significantly higher in the sites evaluated in the low back pain group (p < 0.001). In patients with low back pain, pain perception was weakly and inversely correlated with pressure pain tolerance (r = -0.31; p = 0.05) and moderately correlated to the temperature of the evaluated sites (r = 0.51 to 0.59, p ≤ 0.001). Also, an inverse and weak to moderate association was observed between pressure pain tolerance thresholds and temperature in patients only (r = -0.36 to −0.49; p ≤ 0.02).ConclusionIndividuals with low back pain have lower pressure pain tolerance thresholds and higher superficial temperature in the lumbar region when compared to healthy individuals. The associations observed show that the higher the pain perception, the lower the pain tolerance and the higher the superficial temperature in the lumbar region. Also, the higher the temperature, the lower the pain tolerance.     

Aerobic exercise training in addition to conventional physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

Chan CW, Mok NW, Yeung EW. Aerobic exercise training in addition to conventional physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Objective

To examine the effect of adding aerobic exercise to conventional physiotherapy treatment for patients with chronic low back pain (LBP) in reducing pain and disability.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Setting

A physiotherapy outpatient setting in Hong Kong.

Participants

Patients with chronic LBP (N=46) were recruited and randomly assigned to either a control (n=22) or an intervention (n=24) group.

Interventions

An 8-week intervention; both groups received conventional physiotherapy with additional individually tailored aerobic exercise prescribed only to the intervention group.

Main Outcome Measures

Visual analog pain scale, Aberdeen Low Back Pain Disability Scale, and physical fitness measurements were taken at baseline, 8 weeks, and 12 months from the commencement of the intervention. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to examine between-group differences.

Results

Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in pain (P<.001) and an improvement in disability (P<.001) at 8 weeks and 12 months; however, no differences were observed between groups. There was no significant difference in LBP relapse at 12 months between the 2 groups (χ²=2.30, P=.13).

Conclusions

The addition of aerobic training to conventional physiotherapy treatment did not enhance either short- or long-term improvement of pain and disability in patients with chronic LBP.