Comparative bioavailability study of cefixime (equivalent to 100 mg/5 ml) suspension (Winex vs Suprax) in healthy male volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new suspension formulation of cefixime (100 mg/5 ml), Winex, relative to the reference product, Suprax (100 mg/5 ml) suspension. The bio-availability study was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single oral dose (200 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products on 2 treatment days after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. A randomized, balanced two-way crossover design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 16 hours. Plasma concentrations of cefixime were analyzed using a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for cefixime were determined using standard non-compartmental method. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Kel, t1/2 and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using raw and log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pnfinity harmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80 - 125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 88.93 - 107.10%, 89.09 - 107.11%, 89.63 - 108.58% and 96.85 - 105.29%, respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax using the Schuirmann's two one-sided t-tests. Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

A randomized, crossover study to determine bioequivalence of two brands of dexibuprofen 400 mg tablets in healthy Asian adult male subjects of Indian origin

AIM: To estimate the bioavailability and evaluate bioequivalence of a single dose of a dexibuprofen tablet (test formulation, containing dexibuprofen 400 mg, manufactured by Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Pune, India) and to compare it with that of a single dose of a Seractil tablet (reference formulation, containing dexibuprofen 400 mg, manufactured by Genus Pharmaceuticals, Bershire, UK) under fasting conditions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using a two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, randomized crossover design, test and reference formulations were administered as individual single doses to 24 healthy adult Asian male subjects of Indian origin under non-fed conditions, with 4 days washout period between dosing. 17 blood samples were drawn from each subject over a 12-hour period. Pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity and Cmax/AUC0-infinity were calculated from the plasma concentration-time data of each individual and during each period by applying non-compartmental analysis. Analysis of variance was carried out using logarithmically transformed and non-transformed values of the stated pharmacokinetic parameters. Data for test and reference formulations were analyzed statistically to test for bioequivalence of the two formulations. RESULTS: All 24 subjects who received the two formulations on two occasions with a washout period of 4 days, completed the study and provided an adequate amount of blood at each sampling point. After oral administration the values of Cmax (microg/ml), tmax (h), AUC0-t (microg/ml x h), AUC0-infinity (microg/ml x h) for reference and test formulations were 23.501 and 22.948, 1.156 and 1.281, 69.795 and 68.455, and 72.454 and 70.208, respectively. ANOVA and CI test showed no significant (p > 0.05) variation in these pharmacokinetic parameters of test and reference formulations. When the AUC0-t values for both formulations for non-transformed and log-transformed data were compared, the test formulation showed a bioavailability of 98.08% and 99.56%, respectively, as compared to reference formulation. These values are within the acceptance limit of 80 - 120%. No adverse events were observed in any of the subjects during the two runs of the study. Both clinical and laboratory parameters of all subjects showed no clinically significant changes. CONCLUSION: The test formulation containing dexibuprofen 400 mg (manufactured by Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Pune, India) was bioequivalent to reference formulation (Seractil, manufactured by Genus Pharmaceuticals, Berkshire, UK). Both formulations were well tolerated. The test formulation can be considered a pharmaceutically and therapeutically equivalent alternative to Seractil.     

Bioequivalence study of two limaprost alfadex 5 microg tablets in healthy subjects: moisture-resistant tablet (dextran formulation) versus standard tablet (lactose formulation)

OBJECTIVE: A study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two limaprost alfadex 5 microg tablets, a moisture-resistant tablet (dextran formulation) and a standard tablet (lactose formulation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical investigation was designed as a randomized, open-labeled, two-part, two-treatment, two-period crossover study, in 120 healthy male volunteers. One tablet of either formulation was administered with 200 ml of water after 10-hour overnight fast. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 6 hours. Plasma harvested from blood was analyzed for limaprost by a validated LC/MS/MS method. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values and time associated with the maximal concentration (tmax) were obtained from the observed data. The elimination rate constant (lambda z) was obtained as the slope of the linear regression of the log-transformed concentration values vs. time data in the terminal phase, and the elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated as 0.693/lambda z. The area under the curve to the last measurable point (AUC0-t) was estimated by the linear trapezoidal rule. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using log-transformed AUC0-t, AUC0-A yen and Cmax and untransformed tmax, and 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-t and Cmax were calculated. If the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for both AUC0-t and Cmax fell fully within the interval 80 - 125%, the bioequivalence of the two formulations was established. RESULTS: The means of AUC0-t were 0.779 vs. 0.754 pg x h/ml (test vs. reference), and the means of the Cmax were 1.26 vs. 1.12 pg/ml (test vs. reference). The geometric mean ratios of the test formulation to reference formulation for AUC0-t and Cmax were 104.0 and 112.4%, respectively, and the 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax were 100.7 - 107.4% and 105.6 - 119.6%, respectively. Both 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax fell within the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan accepted bioequivalence range of 80 - 125%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, the moisture-resistant tablet was determined to be bioequivalent to the standard tablet.     

Bioequivalence assessment of Lovrak (Julphar, UAE) compared with Zovirax (Glaxo Wellcome, UK)--Two brands of Acyclovir--in healthy human volunteers

Two studies were performed to assess the relative bioavailability of Lovrak (Julphar, UAE) compared with Zovirax (Glaxo Wellcome, UK) at the International Pharmaceutical Research Center (IPRC), Amman, Jordan. One study involved acyclovir tablets and the other acyclovir suspension. Each study enrolled 24 volunteers and in both studies, after an overnight fasting, the two brands of acyclovir were administered as a single dose on 2 treatment days separated by 1 week washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 16 h. Plasma harvested from blood, was analysed for acyclovir by an HPLC method with UV detection. Various pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, Tmax, T1/2 and Kelm were determined from plasma concentrations for both formulations and found to be in good agreement with the reported values. AUC0-t, AUC(0-proportional to), and Cmax were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data. No significant difference was found based on ANOVA; 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference ratio of these parameters were found within the bioequivalence acceptance range 80%-125%. Based on these statistical inferences it was concluded that a Lovrak tablet is bioequivalent to a Zovirax tablet and that Lovrak suspension is bioequivalent to Zovirax suspension.     

Bioequivalence study of two capsule formulations containing diacerein 50 mg in healthy human subjects

This study presents the results of a two-way, two-period, two-treatment crossover investigation in 12 healthy Indian male subjects to assess the bioequivalence of two oral formulations containing 50 mg of diacerein (CAS 13739-02-1). Both formulations were administered orally as a single dose separated by a one-week washout period. The content of diacerein in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results of this study indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax, values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.63% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of doxycycline capsules in healthy male subjects

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of doxycycline (CAS 564-25-0) from two different doxycycline hyclate (CAS 24390-14-5) capsules (Monodoks 100 mg capsule as test preparation and 100 mg capsule of the originator product as reference preparation) in 24 healthy male subjects. The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 16 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose, and doxycycline plasma concentrations were determined with a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 1,715.1 ng/ml (test) and 1,613.3 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 28,586.5 ng x h/ml (test) and 29,047.5 ng x h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 1.88 h (test) and 2.00 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of 16.49 h (test) and 16.75 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 92.39 %-103.53% (AUC(0-infinity)) and 98.45%-111.74% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 0%-125%.     

Bioequivalence of two oral formulations of triflusal capsules in healthy volunteers

Triflusal (CAS 322-79-2) is an antiplatelet agent related to salicylates used in several European and Latin American countries in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the bioequivalence of triflusal derived from two preparations using both parent drug and metabolite pharmacokinetic data. The bioavailabolity was measured in 24 healthy male Caucasian volunteers following a single oral dose (600 mg) of the test or reference products in the fasting state. Blood samples were collected for 120 h. Plasma concentrations of triflusal and its metabolite 3-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylbenzoic acid (HTB) were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV and fluorescence detection, respectively. The non-compartmental method was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Log-transformed Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity were tested for bioequivalence using ANOVA and Schuirmann's two-one sided t-test. Tmax was analyzed by nonparametric pharmacokinetic parameters of triflusal and HTB derived from the two formulations were nearly consistent with previous observations. Triflusal parameters derived from the test and reference drug were as follows: Cmax (16.85 +/- 11.41 vs 14.48 +/- 7.22 mg/l), AUC0-t (18.43 +/- 10.91 vs 16.22 +/- 7.58 mg/l per hour), Tmax (1 range 0.25-2h vs 0.875 range 0.25-1.5 h), and t(1/2) (0.49 +/- 00.27 vs 0.76 +/- 0.64). HTB parameters after test and reference formulation administration were as follows: Cmax (68.13 +/- 23.05 vs 65.51 +/- 19.44 mg/l), AUC0-t (2748.18 +/- 971.91 vs 2877.97 +/- 881.2 h x mg/l), AUC0-infinity (3350.15 +/- 1182.62 vs 3372.49 +/- 1110.35 h x mg/l), Tmax (2 range 1-10 h vs 2 range 0.75-12 h), and t(1/2) (42.19 +/- 7.82 vs 43.13 +/- 6.56 h). 90% of confidence intervals for the test/reference ratio of Cmax AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity derived from both triflusal and HTB were found within the range of 80%-125% acceptable for bioequivalence. No significant difference was found between the Tmax values for triflusal and HTB. It was concluded that the two preparations are bioequivalent and may be prescribed interchangeably.     

Comparative bioavailability of alpha-methyldopa normal and film tablet formulations after single oral administration in healthy volunteers.

In a single dose, randomized, cross-over study, with one week of wash-out period, the relative bioavailability of Dopegyt tablets containing 250 mg alpha-methyldopa (AMD) and Presinol film tablets with identical active ingredient content was examined in 24 healthy volunteers. Since technologically two completely different preparations (a film-tablet and a non-film-tablet) having significantly different in vitro dissolution were to be compared, both preparations were compared to a third one, AMD solution (Dopegyt solution) with 250 mg/50 ml concentration. Plasma concentrations of the drug were measured for 24 hours post-dose, applying HPLC with fluorometric detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters calculated from individual data (AUC0-infinity, AUC0-t, Cmax, Cmax/AUC0-infinity, t(max)) were evaluated statistically. Wilcoxon's nonparametric test and the four-way variance analysis could not detect any significant difference at the usual a=95% probability level in these pharmacokinetic parameters of the two tablet preparations. For AUC0-infinity at the 90% probability level, the confidence interval was 0.883-1.237 (with an estimated geometric mean of 1.045), for the test/reference ratio of Dopegyt and Presinol tablets, thus the two preparations proved to be bioequivalent. The relative bioavailability of Dopegyt (test preparation) and Presinol (reference preparation) calculated from the AUC0-infinity values was 116.7+/-56.7% that also confirmed bioequivalence. The results of all the applied statistical tests suggest that Dopegyt and Presinol can be considered as bioequivalent preparations.     

Bioequivalence of two oral ciprofloxacin tablets formulations

The relative bioavailability of a new 750 mg tablet formulation of ciprofloxacin (test formulation supplied by Dr. August Wolff GmbH and Co., Germany) was compared with that of Ciprobay tablets 750 mg (reference formulation from Bayer Vital GmbH and Co., Germany). Twenty-four healthy volunteers (12 male and 12 female) were included in this single-dose, 2-sequence, crossover randomized study. Blood samples were obtained prior to dosing and at 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24 and 30 hours after drug administration. Plasma concentrations of ciprofloxacin were determined by HPLC. No differences were found when the in vitro dissolution profiles of both formulations were compared. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data, and ratios of tmax were evaluated nonparametrically. The parametric analysis revealed the following mean values for the test/reference ratios (90% standard confidence intervals in parenthesis (ln-transformed data): 1.01 (0.95-1.07) for AUC(0-t), 0.99 (0.93-1.05) for AUC(0-infinity), 1.05 (0.97-1.14) for Cmax and 1.06 (0.97-1.15) for Cmax/AUC(0-infinity). The nonparametric confidence interval for tmax was 0.77-1.15. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations as their confidence intervals were within the bioequivalence acceptable range of 0.80-1.25 limits; the 90% confidence interval for tmax slightly exceeded limits of bioequivalence. We conclude that both formulations show bioequivalence for both the rate and the extent of absorption.     

Bioequivalence study of two tablet formulations containing rimonabant 20 mg in healthy Indian subjects

A randomized, two-treatment and two-way crossover study on twelve healthy Indian male subjects was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two tablet formulations containing 20 mg of rimonabant (CAS 158681-13-1). Both of the formulations were administered orally as a single dose with a 45-day washout period between two dosing sessions. The content of rimonabant in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results of this investigation indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.62% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.     

Bioequivalence study of two losartan formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new losartan preparation (2-butyl-4-chloro-1-[p-(o-1H-tetrazol-5-ylphenyl)benzyl]imidazole-5-methanol monopotassium salt, CAS 114798-26-4) was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 32. The open, randomized, single-blind two-sequence, two-period crossover study design was performed. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg losartan as a test or reference formulation. The plasma concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-36h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. Values of AUC0-infinity demonstrate nearly identical bioavailability of losartan from the examined formulations. The AUC0-infinity of losartan was 2019.92+/-1002.90 and 2028.58+/-837.45 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The AUC0-infinity of the metabolite was 10851.52+/-4438.66 and 11041.18 +/-5015.81 ng x h/ml for test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of losartan was 745.94+/-419.75 ng/ml for the test and 745.74+/-329.99 ng/ml for the reference product and the Cmax of the metabolite was 1805.77+/-765.39 and 1606.22 +/-977.22 ng/ml for the test and reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both losartan and its active metabolite. 90 % confidence limits calculated for Cmax and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of losartan and its metabolite were included in the bioequivalence range (0.8-1.25 for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for losartan and its main active metabolite.     

Comparative bioavailability of two fluconazole capsule formulations in healthy volunteers

This work reports the bioavailability of two fluconazole (CAS 86386-73-4) capsule formulations in 24 healthy volunteers of both sexes who received a single oral dose (150 mg). The study was conducted using an open, randomized, two-period crossover design with two-week washout interval. Plasma samples were obtained up to 168 h after drug administration and fluconazole concentration were analyzed using electrospray tandem mass spectrometry coupled to liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for fluconazole after the administration of each formulation included the area under the curve (AUC)(0-168 h), AUC(0-infinity), maximum concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), elimination constant (Ke) and half-life (T1/2). The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test formulation/reference formulation were 97.18-108.60% for AUC0-168 h), 90.87-111.11% for AUC(0-infinity), 104.88-114.88% for Cmax 90.38-136.79% for Ke, 91.87-108.93% for T1/2 and (-)1.5-(-)0.10 for Tmax (for individual differences). Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% CI are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the test formulation (Zoltrix) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of two terbinafine hydrochloride formulations after single-dose administration in Chinese healthy subjects

The bioavailability of a new terbinafine (CAS 91161-71-6) preparation was compared with a commercially available original preparation (reference) of the drug in 19 Chinese healthy male volunteers. The study was performed in an open, randomized, single blind two-sequence, two-period crossover design. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 250 mg terbinafine as a test or reference formulation with a 7-day washout period between the two preparations. The plasma concentrations of terbinafine were analyzed by a sensitive liquid chromatography-ultraviolet spectrometry method. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC(0-t) AUC(0-infinity), C(max), t1/2, and T(max). The values of AUC(0-t) demonstrated nearly identical bioavailability of terbinafine from the examined formulations. The AUC(0.48) of terbinafine was 5982.85 +/- 2449.17 and 6761.63 +/- 3140.33 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of terbinafine was 1656.25 +/- 623.18 ng/ml for the test and 1552.07 +/- 660.35 ng/ml for the reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for C(max) and the area under the plasma concentration time curve for terbinafine. The 90% confidence limits calculated for C(max) and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of terbinafine were within the bioequivalence range (80%-125% for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of terbinafine.     

Comparative bioavailability of two sertraline tablet formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Thai volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bioavailability of two sertraline tablet (50 mg) formulations (Serlift from Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., Gurgaon Haryana, India, as a test formulation and Zoloft from Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd., West Ryde, New South Wales, Australia, as a reference formulation) in 24 healthy Thai male volunteers under fasting condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, single-dose, crossover study with a washout period of 3 weeks, was conducted in 24 healthy Thai male volunteers. Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours following drug administration. Plasma concentrations of sertraline were determined using validated LC-MS/MS method. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics and statistical analyses were performed using SAS software for Windows, release 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). RESULTS: The ratio of least square means and the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the log-transformed data were 0.9950 (0.9111-1.0866) for Cmax, 1.0153 (0.9576-1.0764) for AUC(0-t) and 1.0110 (0.9510-1.0747) for AUC(0-infinity). In addition, the median tmax values for the test and reference formulations were similar (5.00 h). The 90% CI for Cmax, AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity) were within the 0.8-1.25 interval of the US-FDA. CONCLUSIONS: The test formulation (Serlift, Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., Gurgaon, Haryana, India) is bioequivalent to the reference formulation (Zoloft, Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd., West Ryde, New South Wales, Australia) both in terms of rate and extent of absorption after single-dose administration under fasting condition.     

Nevirapine/lamivudine/stavudine as a combined-formulation tablet: bioequivalence study compared with each component administered concurrently under fasting condition

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the bioequivalence of a fixed-dose combination of a nevirapine 200 mg, lamivudine 150 mg and stavudine 30 mg combination tablet with application of the 3 medications, at the same dosage, concurrently as separate formulations, in healthy, adult subjects under fasting conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An open-label, balanced, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, single-dose, crossover bioavailability study was conducted in 40 subjects with 21-day washout period between each treatment. Blood samples were collected for 168 hours. Plasma concentrations of nevirapine, lamivudine and stavudine were determined using a validated LC-MS-MS method. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics and statistical analyses were performed using SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) software (SAS System under Windows, Version 8.02). RESULTS: The ratios of least-square means and the 90% confidence intervals of the log-transformed data were calculated for AUC(0-t), AUC(0-inf), and Cmax. The 90% confidence interval for least-square mean ratio between test and reference formulation for log-transformed parameters Cmax, AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf) were within the requirements of the 80-125% range. CONCLUSION: The test formulation (Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., Gurgaon, India) is bioequivalent to the reference formulations both in terms of rate and extent of absorption after single-dose administration under fasting condition.     

Bioequivalence study of a fixed dose combination of nitazoxanide and ofloxacin in Indian healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics of nitazoxanide (CAS 55981-09-4) and ofloxacin (CAS 82419-36-1) has been extensively evaluated in adult human volunteers individually after oral administration of tablet formulation. However, no published data is available regarding the combined pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of this particular fixed dose combination. In light of the above, a clinical study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of two fixed dose combination (FDC) products of two manufacturers containing nitazoxanide 500 mg and ofloxacin 200 mg in healthy Indian male volunteers. METHODS: 24 healthy male volunteers (age 25 +/- 4.6 years; weight 74.5 +/- 7.87 kg) were enrolled in this study. Each subject received a Test fixed dose combination and a Reference fixed dose combination formulation in a randomized, single dose, fasting state, two period, crossover study design with a 1-week washout period between the doses. Extraction of the drugs from the plasma was carried out by precipitation method. Analysis of tizoxanide (active metabolite of nitazoxanide) and ofloxacin from plasma samples was done by a simple and sensitive HPLC method using UV detection developed in our laboratory. An analysis of variance was performed on the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity). using general linear model (GLM) procedures in which sources of variation were subject, formulation, period. RESULTS: The results of this investigation indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the two products in either the mean concentration-time profiles or in the obtained pharmacokinetic parameters. 90 % confidence limits for the log-transformed data of Cmax, AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) were within the acceptable range of 0.80-1.25. CONCLUSION: Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two products are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption. Both the preparations were well tolerated with no adverse reactions seen throughout the study.     

Bioequivalence assessment of Azomycin (Julphar, UAE) as compared to Zithromax (Pfizer, USA)--two brands of azithromycin--in healthy human volunteers.

Two studies have been performed to assess the relative bioavailability of Azomycin (Julphar, UAE) as compared with Zithromax (Pfizer, USA) at the International Pharmaceutical Research Center (IPRC), Amman, Jordan. One study involved Azomycin capsules and the other Azomycin suspension. Each study enrolled 24 volunteers and in both studies, after an overnight fasting, the two brands of azithromycin were administered as single dose on two treatment days separated by a 2 weeks washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 192 h. Plasma harvested from blood, was analysed for azithromycin by HPLC coupled with electrochemical detection. Various pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC(0-t,) AUC(0-infinity,) C(max), T(max), T(1/2) and K(elm) were determined from plasma concentrations for both formulations and found to be in good agreement with the reported values. AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data. No significant difference was found based on ANOVA; 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference ratios of these parameters were found within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80-125%. Based on these statistical inferences it was concluded that Azomycin capsule is bioequivalent to Zithromax capsule and Azomycin suspension is bioequivalent to Zithromax suspension.     

Comparative pharmacokinetics of 800 mg of acyclovir-containing Telviran and Zovirax tablets in healthy volunteers]

The authors performed a detailed comparative clinical and pharmacokinetic study with two 800 mg acyclovir containing tablets, namely the Telviran (EGIS Pharmaceuticals Ltd.) and the Zovirax (Wellcome Foundation Ltd.). The determination of the detailed pharmacokinetic parameters and the relative bioavailability was carried out on 24 healthy male volunteers in a two way, open, randomised, cross-over design study after single dose administration. The plasma concentration of acyclovir was determined by a newly developed and validated highly sensitive (LLOQ = 10 ng/ml) HPLC-UV bioanalytical method after sample preparation with RP-18 solid phase extraction method (SPE). The individual pharmacokinetic parameters calculated from the time-plasma concentration curve (tmax, Cmax, AUC0-infinity, AUC0-16, AUC0-t, AUC0-z, AUCRest, t beta 1/2, MRT, Cmax/AUC0-infinity) were compared with statistical methods (ANOVA, ANOVAlog, Confidence interval, Schuirmann, Wilcoxon tests). On the basis of the results of the statistical evaluation and the clinical study, there was no significant difference found between the two acyclovir containing preparations. The comparative pharmacokinetic study demonstrated, that the relative bioavailability of the 800 mg Telviran and Zovirax tablets are equivalent and the two products are bioequivalent.     

Comparison of two microemulsion of cyclosporine A in healthy volunteers

This study evaluated the bioequivalence of a new Cyclosporine A microemulsion formulation in comparison to the reference market standard. Twenty-four adult healthy volunteers were randomised to receive the two Cyclosporin A microemulsion formulations, at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg, according to a cross-over design. Blood samples were taken before drug administration and at 12 points within 24 hours. Cyclosporine A whole blood concentrations were determined by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-t and AUC0-infinity were calculated by the trapezoidal rule, Cmax and Tmax were obtained directly from blood data. AUCs and Cmax were tested for bioequivalence after log transformation of data, differences for Tmax were evaluated by the rank test of Wilcoxon for paired data. The 90% confidence interval ratio between tested/reference drug was 0.98 for AUC0-t, 0.96 for AUC0-infinity and 1.01 for Cmax. All of them were within the range of bioequivalence. Tmax was 1.60 +/- 0.44 hours after test drug and 1.67 +/- 0.48 after reference drug (p = 0.27, Wilcoxon test). According to these results the two Cyclosporine A microemulsion formulations can be considered bioequivalent.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of two digoxin formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability/bioequivalence of two formulations of digoxin (CAS 20830-75-5) were assessed in this paper. The study was conducted in 20 healthy Chinese male volunteers according to an open, randomized, single-blind, 2-way crossover study design with a wash-out phase of 14 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose and digoxin plasma concentrations were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) method. Based on the plasma concentration-time data of each individual during two periods, pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity and t1/2, were calculated by applying noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic data for test and reference formulations were analyzed statistically to evaluate bioequivalence of the two formulations. After oral administration, the values of Cmax Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity for test and reference formulations were 2.61 +/- 0.98 and 2.68 +/- 1.09 ng/ mL, 1.0 +/- 0.4 and 1.0 +/- 0.4 h, 27.94 +/- 3.14 and 27.56 +/- 3.86 h, 28.57 +/- 4.99 and 28.77 +/- 6.53 ng x h/mL, 33.44 +/- 4.85 and 33.63 +/- 7.57 ng x h/mL, respectively. Both primary target parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau, were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Relative bioavailabilities were 102.5 +/- 19.2% for AUC0-infinity, 102.0 +/- 19.3% for AUC0-tau. Bioequivalence between test and reference formulations was demonstrated for both parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau. The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%, which means that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of digoxin.