Beurteilung der diastolischen Herzinsuffizienz

Diastolic heart failure, also known as heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HF-pEF), is responsible for approximately 50 % of all heart failure cases. According to current guidelines the diagnosis HF-pEF requires three criteria: (1) signs or symptoms of heart failure, (2) presence of a normal left ventricular ejection fraction and (3) evidence of diastolic dysfunction. Echocardiography is the diagnostic modality of choice, especially after ruling out other causes of dyspnea, such as pulmonary diseases, heart rhythm disturbances and volume overload. Important echocardiographic parameters for the assessment of diastolic function are atrial dimensions, myocardial mass, mitral inflow pattern, pulmonary vein flow, propagation velocity of mitral inflow and the tissue Doppler of the mitral annulus. Nevertheless, a complete echocardiographic examination should be performed in every patient with heart failure. In general, diastolic dysfunction is frequently associated with increased atrial diameter and left ventricular hypertrophy. In advanced stages pulmonary hypertension can be present. A robust method for evaluation of systolic function in patients with diastolic dysfunction is crucial. The mitral inflow pattern provides various parameters to describe diastolic function (E/A ratio, deceleration time, isovolumetric relaxation time). In case of difficulties to separate a normal from a pseudonormal mitral inflow pattern the Valsalva maneuver can be used. Another valuable parameter for this differentiation is the duration of the backward flow in the pulmonary veins in contrast to forward flow over the mitral valve. Tachycardia or atrial fibrillation is a major problem for grading of diastolic function; however, in patients with atrial fibrillation E/e’ is a well-established parameter. In summary, this review provides a detailed overview and discussion of the established and newer echocardiography techniques for the evaluation of diastolic function and provides an algorithm for the assessment of diastolic dysfunction in everyday routine.     

Doppler echocardiographic-guided diagnosis and therapy of heart failure

Abnormalities of diastolic function play a major role in producing the signs and symptoms of heart failure. In patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular systolic function, concomitant diastolic dysfunction is invariably present. In addition, it is now well established that as many as 40% to 50% of patients with well-documented episodes of heart failure have preserved systolic function. Doppler echocardiography provides one of the most useful clinical tools for assessing left ventricular diastolic function and can provide diagnostic and prognostic information. The Doppler assessment of diastolic function should be part of the routine echocardiographic evaluation of patients suspected of having heart failure. This review focuses on the use of Doppler echocardiographic techniques to assess diastolic function. The Doppler patterns of diastolic filling observed and their progression over time in patients with myocardial disease are described and related to changes in the physiology of diastolic filling. In addition, Doppler echocardiographic-guided treatment strategies for heart failure are discussed.     

Echokardiographische Diagnostik der diastolischen Herzinsuffizienz

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction can be diagnosed if clinical signs of heart failure and normal ejection fraction are found. Beside clinical signs of heart failure and criteria from catheterization studies like abnormal left ventricular relaxation, filling and/or compliance echocardiography provides valuable parameters for the assessment of diastolic dysfunction. ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DEGREES OF SEVERITY: By the use of various parameters diastolic dysfunction can be differentiated into four degrees of severity, which are of great prognostic importance. If more than one echocardiographic parameter is used, sensitivity for the assessment of diastolic dysfunction becomes nearly 100%. Conventional parameters include isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) measured by pulsed Doppler, the ratio of rapid filling and atrial filling velocity (E/A), deceleration time of rapid mitral inflow as well as the ratio of systolic and diastolic pulmonary venous flow velocities. In patients with signs of diastolic heart failure and a normal E/A ratio pulmonary venous flow pattern can help to unmask "pseudonormalization" as the transition from abnormal relaxation to restriction. These parameters, however, are preload-dependent and do not provide intrinsic left ventricular properties. Even in atrial fibrillation, left ventricular filling pressure can be assessed. NEW METHODS: Two novel approaches, color Doppler M-mode of left ventricular inflow and tissue Doppler of the mitral annulus, are relatively preload-independent and allow direct estimation of relaxation and filling pressure. By the means of real-time 3-D echocardiography we developed a new method for the non-invasive assessment of rapid filling rate (PFR), thereby completing the echocardiographic approaches to determine diastolic dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The broad spectrum of approaches available today makes echocardiography the first choice for the assessment of diastolic dysfunction.     

Left ventricular function in adult patients with atrial septal defect: implication for development of heart failure after transcatheter closure

Despite advances in device closure for atrial septal defect (ASD), post-closure heart failure observed in adult patients remains a clinical problem. Although right heart volume overload is the fundamental pathophysiology in ASD, the post-closure heart failure characterized by acute pulmonary congestion is likely because of age-related left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, which is manifested by acute volume loading with ASD closure. Aging also appears to play important roles in the pathophysiology of heart failure through several mechanisms other than diastolic dysfunction, including ventricular systolic and vascular stiffening and increased incidence of comorbidities that significantly affect cardiovascular function. Recent studies suggested that accurate assessment of preclosure diastolic function, such as test ASD occlusion, may help identify high-risk patients for post-closure heart failure. Anti–heart failure therapy before device closure or the use of fenestrated device appears to be effective in preventing post-closure heart failure in the high-risk patients. However, the long-term outcome of such patients remains to be elucidated. Future studies are warranted to construct an algorithm to identify and treat patients at high risk for heart failure after device closure of ASD.     

Assessment of global and regional left ventricular diastolic function in hypertensive heart disease using automated border detection techniques

Acoustic quantification (AQ) and color kinesis (CK) are techniques that involve automated detection and tracking of endocardial borders. These methods are useful for the evaluation of global and regional left ventricular (LV) systolic function and more recently have been applied to evaluating LV diastolic performance. Assessment of diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive heart disease is a relevant clinical issue in which these techniques have proven useful. The diastolic portion of left atrium and LV AQ area waveforms are frequently abnormal in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Left ventricular AQ curves consistently demonstrate reduced rapid filling fraction (RFF) and peak rapid filling rate (PRFR), elevated atrial filling fraction (AFF), peak atrial filling rate (PAFR), and reductions in the ratio PRFR/PAFR. Acoustic quantification complements traditional Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of global diastolic function. Many patients with significant LVH and normal Doppler diastolic parameters can be identified as having diastolic dysfunction with AQ. In addition, CK has allowed the evaluation of regional diastolic performance in hypertensive patients. Regional filling curves obtained from CK have demonstrated that endocardial diastolic motion is commonly delayed and heterogeneous in patients with LVH.     

Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is prevalent in the community. Current assessment of diastolic function can be complex, involving Doppler evaluation of an array of hemodynamic data. The relation between left atrial (LA) volume and diastolic function, and between LA volume and cardiovascular risk and disease burden are not well known. In the present prospective study of 140 adults, mean age 58 ± 19 years, referred for a clinically-indicated echocardiogram and in sinus rhythm, with no history of atrial arrhythmias or valvular heart disease, we determined the LA volume, LV diastolic function status, cardiovascular risk score (based on age, gender, history of systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking), and cardiovascular disease burden (based on confirmed vascular disease, congestive heart failure, and transient ischemic attack or stroke). LA volume was found to correlate positively with age, body surface area, cardiovascular risk score, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions, LV mass, diastolic function grade, tissue Doppler E/E′, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, and negatively with LV ejection fraction (all p <0.006). In a multivariate clinical model, LA volume indexed to body surface area (indexed LA volume) was independently associated with cardiovascular risk score (p <0.001), congestive heart failure (p = 0.014), vascular disease (p = 0.012), transient ischemic attack or stroke (p = 0.021), and history of smoking (p = 0.008). In a clinical and echocardiographic model, indexed LA volume was strongly associated with diastolic function grade (p <0.001), independent of LV ejection fraction, age, gender, and cardiovascular risk score. In patients without a history of atrial arrhythmias or valvular heart disease, LA volume expressed the severity of diastolic dysfunction and provided an index of cardiovascular risk and disease burden.     

The relation between transmitral early filling wave deceleration time and the recovery of atrial contractility after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm is associated with transient left atrial dysfunction and this phenomenon may lead to thrombus formation and embolic stroke. Delay of atrial mechanical function recovery may be related to ventricular diastolic function. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of left ventricular diastolic function as well as the multiple clinical factors on the recovery of atrial systolic function after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A total of 44 patients (28 male, 16 female, 61+/-18 years) with chronic AF (> or =1 month) underwent electrical cardioversion. Deceleration time of early filling wave (pre-CV EDT) on transmitral inflow obtained by using Doppler echocardiography before cardioversion and serial transmitral inflow Doppler variables were recorded through a 1 week study period in all patients. Various clinical (age, gender, the duration of AF) and echocardiographic variables (pre-CV EDT, left atrial dimension, left ventricular ejection fraction) were tested for an association with peak atrial filling wave velocity (VA) on day 1, 3 and 7 after cardioversion. RESULTS: EDT measured before cardioversion had a strong linear correlation with peak VA on every echocardiographic evaluation after cardioversion (Regression coefficient (R)=0.69, P<0.001; R=0.78, P<0.001 and R=0.83, P<0.001, on day 1, day 3 and day 7, respectively). The effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on peak VA was weaker than those of EDT. The duration of AF showed an inverse association with the recovery of atrial function, but this lost on multivariate analysis. None of the other parameters significantly correlated with peak VA after cardioversion. CONCLUSION: The recovery of atrial mechanical function after cardioversion, as assessed by peak VA on transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is mainly associated with the left ventricular diastolic function as measured by EDT, whereas the left ventricular systolic function relatively a small effect on this outcome. The duration of AF does not have any association with peak VA, possibly if it is chronic.     

Valsartan, an angiotensin II type-I receptor blocker, and left ventricular diastolic function--a case report

Impaired diastolic function is related to subjective symptoms, reduced exercise capacity, and poor prognosis in patients with congestive heart failure, and an angiotensin II type-I receptor blocker might have a beneficial effect on diastolic function in such patients with heart failure. A 53-year-old woman underwent valvuloplasty of the mitral valve and later presented with heart failure symptoms, including exertional dyspnea and easy fatigue. Although no pathological changes could be identified by radiography of the chest, electrocardiography, or routine echocardiography, the assessment of diastolic function with Doppler echocardiography revealed left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Her neurohumoral parameters and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction improved after 1 month of treatment with Valsartan, an angiotensin II type-I receptor blocker, accompanied by improvement of her subjective symptoms. This case implies that angiotensin II type-I receptor blocker could improve left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and that Doppler echocardiography might be useful for detecting diastolic dysfunction in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery.     

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Heart Failure

Atrial fibrillation (AF) worsens outcome in patients with systolic heart failure and the presence of heart failure (HF) predicts a 5- to 6-fold increase in risk of AF. In addition to loss of atrial systole, AF may contribute to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction due a rapid ventricular rate, irregularity of rhythm and exacerbation of mitral regurgitation due to atrial dilatation. Elimination of atrial fibrillation with catheter ablation can improve ejection fraction and reduce heart failure symptoms and appears superior to AV node ablation and bi-ventricular pacing. AF ablation can restore sinus rhythm in most patients with heart failure. Additional study is warranted to identify which patients will receive maximum benefit from aggressive rhythm control and to determine efficacy in patients with diastolic heart failure.     

Diastolic dysfunction and diabetic cardiomyopathy: evaluation by Doppler echocardiography.

Doppler echocardiography has largely contributed to show the existence of a distinct diabetic cardiomyopathy. Several studies have pointed out the evidence of left ventricular (LV) remodeling and hypertrophy in alterations of both midwall systolic mechanics and LV diastolic filling in diabetes mellitus (DM), independent of the coexistence of concomitant risk factors. Further progress will be provided by new ultrasound technologies in this clinical setting. The combination of pulsed tissue Doppler study of mitral annulus with transmitral inflow may be clinically valuable for obtaining information about left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) and unmasking Doppler inflow pseudonormal pattern, a hinge point for the progression toward advanced heart failure. In the absence of epicardial coronary artery stenosis, the ultrasound assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR) may identify the dysfunction of coronary microcirculation, in relation with glycemic levels, insulin resistance, sympathetic overdrive, endothelial dysfunction, abnormalities of the angiotensin-renin system, and LV remodeling/hypertrophy. Diastolic dysfunction and impairment of CFR may be associated in DM, with a likely common origin. In this view, a comprehensive transthoracic Doppler evaluation of diabetic patients should include the assessment of diastolic function and estimation of LVFP by tissue Doppler, and coronary microvascular function by CFR test. Additional analysis of regional wall motion during a stress test would be required in patients with suspected coronary artery disease, another cause of diastolic dysfunction.     

Diastolic dysfunction and diabetic cardiomyopathy: evaluation by Doppler echocardiography

Doppler echocardiography has largely contributed to show the existence of a distinct diabetic cardiomyopathy. Several studies have pointed out the evidence of left ventricular (LV) remodeling and hypertrophy in alterations of both midwall systolic mechanics and LV diastolic filling in diabetes mellitus (DM), independent of the coexistence of concomitant risk factors. Further progress will be provided by new ultrasound technologies in this clinical setting. The combination of pulsed tissue Doppler study of mitral annulus with transmitral inflow may be clinically valuable for obtaining information about left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) and unmasking Doppler inflow pseudonormal pattern, a hinge point for the progression toward advanced heart failure. In the absence of epicardial coronary artery stenosis, the ultrasound assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR) may identify the dysfunction of coronary microcirculation, in relation with glycemic levels, insulin resistance, sympathetic overdrive, endothelial dysfunction, abnormalities of the angiotensin-renin system, and LV remodeling/hypertrophy. Diastolic dysfunction and impairment of CFR may be associated in DM, with a likely common origin. In this view, a comprehensive transthoracic Doppler evaluation of diabetic patients should include the assessment of diastolic function and estimation of LVFP by tissue Doppler, and coronary microvascular function by CFR test. Additional analysis of regional wall motion during a stress test would be required in patients with suspected coronary artery disease, another cause of diastolic dysfunction.     

Doppler tissue imaging in congestive heart failure patients due to diastolic or systolic dysfunction: a comparison with Doppler echocardiography and the atrio-ventricular plane displacement technique

BACKGROUND: Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) is an echocardiographic technique by which regional contractility, relaxation properties and time intervals are obtained easily. DTI has been reported to be relatively pre-load independent and could, in comparison with the commonly used mitral pulse wave Doppler (MPWD) method, be of clinical interest for identification of patients with diastolic dysfunction. The atrio-ventricular plane displacement (AVPD) method is an established technique to assess left ventricular systolic function. AIMS: To determine the pulsed Doppler DTI-pattern in patients with heart failure and to examine whether it has a similar capacity as MPWD and AVPD to diagnose diastolic dysfunction. METHODS: We studied 15 controls without congestive heart failure (CHF), 15 patients with diastolic (EF>45%+CHF) and 15 patients with systolic (EF<35%+CHF) left ventricular dysfunction and CHF. RESULTS: The DTI maximal velocities during systole (s), early filling wave (e) and atrial filling wave (a), decrease with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, r=0.75, r=0.56 and r=0.66 (P<0.001) and regional isovolumetric contraction and intraventricular relaxation time measured by DTI are prolonged, r=0.59 and r=0.73, respectively (P<0.001). The 15 patients with diastolic heart failure were identified by MPWD or DTI but only 11 by AVPD with 8, 10 and 9 false-positive, respectively (P<0.01, P<0.05 and NS). CONCLUSIONS: Regional DTI show a consistent pattern in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. Regional DTI has similar accuracy as MPWD in identifying diastolic heart failure patients and is superior to the AVPD technique. DTI may be a useful diagnostic tool in diastolic heart failure patients.     

Assessment of ventricular diastolic function.

A large number of patients suspected of having congestive heart failure have normal left ventricular systolic function and may, therefore, have primary diastolic heart failure. This diagnosis, however, should not be made unless there is also objective evidence of diastolic dysfunction, ie, signs of abnormal left ventricular relaxation and/or diastolic distensibility. The most useful noninvasive diagnostic approaches are the measurement of transmitral and pulmonary venous flow velocities by pulsed wave Doppler, and mitral annulus velocities by tissue Doppler echocardiography. In some patients, the assessment of intraventricular flow propagation by colour M-mode Doppler echocardiography provides additional information. Diastolic heart failure is most often due to coronary artery disease and/or hypertension; therefore, other noninvasive or invasive tests are needed to define the etiology of myocardial dysfunction. However, in the few patients who have constrictive pericarditis, the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of diastolic filling provides the most important clues to the etiology of the disease. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular filling may also be used to obtain semiquantitative estimates of left ventricular diastolic pressure. Furthermore, left ventricular filling patterns, in particular, the deceleration time of early transmitral filling, are powerful predictors of patient prognosis. It is probably not cost effective to perform a comprehensive assessment of diastolic filling in every patient undergoing an echocardiographic examination. However, in selected patients, the assessment of diastolic filling provides information that is important for patient management.     

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with so-called lone atrial fibrillation

Lone atrial fibrillation (AF) is defined by the absence of identifiable causes of AF, but its hemodynamics have not been investigated. Twenty-eight patients with lone AF were compared with 14 control patients referred for Wolff-Parkinson-White ablation. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography were performed to rule out structural heart disease, followed by transseptally performed complete hemodynamic evaluation of the left heart systolic and diastolic function. There was no evidence of diastolic dysfunction according to echocardiographic criteria in AF and control patients. There was no difference in echocardiographic measurements, except for a significantly higher inferosuperior left atrial dimension seen in the four-chamber apical view in AF patients (51+/-10 vs 40+/-6 mm, P = 0.03). Hemodynamic evaluation showed that end-diastolic left ventricular pressure and the nadir of the left atrial Y descent were significantly higher in lone AF patients versus controls: 13+/-5 versus 8+/-3 mmHg (P = 0.001) and 6.7+/-3 versus 4.6+/-2.7 mmHg (P = 0.05). Our results demonstrated the presence of diastolic left heart dysfunction in patients with so-called lone AF.     

Heart failure due to abnormal filling function of the heart

Symptoms of heart failure can be caused by the diastolic dysfunction even in patients with normal ejection fraction, and this condition has been called diastolic heart failure. After Kitabatake and his associates first used echo-Doppler to characterize the transmitral flow velocity in various disease states in 1982, there have been remarkable advances in the evaluation of diastolic function with Doppler echocardiography. Types of diastolic dysfunction can be classified into relaxation abnormality, pseudonormal, reversible restrictive physiology, and irreversible restrictive physiology. Classifying the patients into these types, in addition to the reliable estimation of left ventricular filling pressure with Doppler echocardiography, enables us to adjust treatment in individual patients and to get information about the prognosis. The main hemodynamic abnormality in patients with diastolic dysfunction is the abnormal filling function of the heart. Therefore, if we expand the scope of diastolic heart failure, patients with constrictive pericarditis can also be categorized into diastolic heart failure. The purpose of this review is to refine our knowledge in the concept of diastolic dysfunction and to update the methods used in its' evaluation.     

Left ventricular early diastolic inflow velocity and atrial ventricular plane downward velocity: useful parameters to test diastolic function in clinical practice? Diastolic parameters tested in a clinical setting.

AIMS: To study the clinical value of the colour-M-mode slope of the early diastolic left ventricular filling phase (Vp) and the early diastolic downward M-mode slope of the left atrioventricular plane displacement (EDS), compared with diastolic function assessed by traditional Doppler evaluation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 65 consecutive patients EDS and Vp were compared with a four-degree traditional diastolic function classification, based on pulsed Doppler assessment of the early to atrial transmitral flow ratio (E/A), the E-wave deceleration time (Edt), and the systolic to diastolic (S/D) pulmonary venous inflow ratio. Vp (P=0.006) and EDS (P=0.045) were related to traditional diastolic function (Kruskal--Wallis analysis). EDS showed a trend brake between the moderate and severe diastolic dysfunction groups by traditional Doppler evaluation. Vp and EDS correlated weakly in simple linear regression analysis (r=0.33). Vp and EDS discriminated poorly between normal and highly abnormal diastolic function. CONCLUSIONS: Vp and EDS were significantly related to diastolic function by traditional Doppler evaluation. They were, however, not useful as single parameters of left ventricular diastolic function due to a small difference between normal and highly abnormal values, allowing for little between-measurement variability. Consequently, these methods for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function do not add significantly to traditional Doppler evaluation.     

Left ventricular diastolic function in mitral stenosis

The assessment of left ventricular (LV) function in the setting of mitral stenosis (MS) has been critically examined for decades. Accurate assessment of aberrations in diastolic function is important as these subjects often present with signs and symptoms of heart failure and pulmonary congestion that cannot be solely explained by the severity of mechanical obstruction. Echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic dysfunction includes an evaluation of reduced LV compliance, diminished restoring forces, and enhanced stiffness, which are challenging in the setting of MS owing to altered hemodynamic loading. Conventional echocardiographic and Doppler measures offer limited information. Novel assessments employing speckle tracking echocardiography are relatively less studied. A more comprehensive assessment including clinical evaluation, identification of concomitant disorders, and comorbidities is particularly warranted in older subjects with degenerative MS to suspect diastolic dysfunction and arrive at optimal medical therapy or intervention. This review provides an overview of etiological, pathophysiological, echocardiographic, and invasive assessment of diastolic dysfunction in the setting of MS, with specific focus on strengths and limitations of available echocardiographic and Doppler techniques.     

Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in the Elderly

Previous studies using pulsed Doppler echocardiography have demonstrated a pattern of abnormal left ventricular relaxation associated with increasing age. Specifically, aging is associated with decreased peak velocity of early diastolic mitral inflow, increased peak velocity of late diastolic inflow, increased isovolumic relaxation time, and early diastolic deceleration time. Abnormal relaxation can progress to significantly elevated left atrial pressure—characterized by increased early peak velocity and shortened isovolumic relaxation time and deceleration time—as part of the disease processes. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is highly prevalent, occurring in one half to two thirds of elderly patients with congestive heart failure, in association with normal systolic function. Left ventricular hypertrophy, which is commonly related to systemic arterial hypertension, and ischemic heart disease are the two major causes of abnormal left ventricular diastolic function in the elderly. Recently, newer echocardiographic techniques have been described that allow more accurate evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. Treatments for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction should focus on the underlying disease etiology as well as on the derangement in left ventricular diastolic function. Although calcium channel blockers and angiotensin—converting enzyme inhibitors have been used clinically to treat diastolic dysfunction, their effects on prognosis remain unproven.     

How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology.

Diastolic heart failure (DHF) currently accounts for more than 50% of all heart failure patients. DHF is also referred to as heart failure with normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (HFNEF) to indicate that HFNEF could be a precursor of heart failure with reduced LVEF. Because of improved cardiac imaging and because of widespread clinical use of plasma levels of natriuretic peptides, diagnostic criteria for HFNEF needed to be updated. The diagnosis of HFNEF requires the following conditions to be satisfied: (i) signs or symptoms of heart failure; (ii) normal or mildly abnormal systolic LV function; (iii) evidence of diastolic LV dysfunction. Normal or mildly abnormal systolic LV function implies both an LVEF > 50% and an LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) <97 mL/m(2). Diagnostic evidence of diastolic LV dysfunction can be obtained invasively (LV end-diastolic pressure >16 mmHg or mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >12 mmHg) or non-invasively by tissue Doppler (TD) (E/E' > 15). If TD yields an E/E' ratio suggestive of diastolic LV dysfunction (15 > E/E' > 8), additional non-invasive investigations are required for diagnostic evidence of diastolic LV dysfunction. These can consist of blood flow Doppler of mitral valve or pulmonary veins, echo measures of LV mass index or left atrial volume index, electrocardiographic evidence of atrial fibrillation, or plasma levels of natriuretic peptides. If plasma levels of natriuretic peptides are elevated, diagnostic evidence of diastolic LV dysfunction also requires additional non-invasive investigations such as TD, blood flow Doppler of mitral valve or pulmonary veins, echo measures of LV mass index or left atrial volume index, or electrocardiographic evidence of atrial fibrillation. A similar strategy with focus on a high negative predictive value of successive investigations is proposed for the exclusion of HFNEF in patients with breathlessness and no signs of congestion. The updated strategies for the diagnosis and exclusion of HFNEF are useful not only for individual patient management but also for patient recruitment in future clinical trials exploring therapies for HFNEF.