Effect of obesity and morbid obesity on the growth hormone (GH) secretion elicited by the combined GHRH + GHRP-6 test

OBJECTIVE: Obesity is characterized by low basal levels of growth hormone (GH) and impeded GH release. However, the main problem arises in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults, as all accepted cut-offs in the diagnostic tests of GH reserve are no longer valid in obese subjects. In this work, the role of obesity in the GH response elicited by the GHRH + GHRP-6 test was assessed in a large population of obese and nonobese subjects. PATIENTS: GHRH + GHRP-6-induced GH peaks were evaluated in 542 subjects. One hundred and five were healthy obese, 50 were morbid obese, and 261 were nonobese (both normal weight and overweight). One hundred and seventy-six GH-deficient patients (obese and nonobese) were also studied. RESULTS: A regression analysis of the 366 subjects with normal pituitary function indicated that adiposity had a negative effect on the elicited GH peak (r = -0.503, P < 0.0001). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that in subjects with a BMI < or =35, the currently accepted cut-offs of the GHRH + GHRP-6 test (GH peaks > or =20 microg/l: normal secretion; GH peaks < or =10 microg/l: GH deficiency), were fully operative. However, in subjects with a BMI > 35, normality was indicated by GH peaks > or =15 microg/l and GH deficiency by peaks < or =5 microg/l (1 microg/l = 2.6 mU/l). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms: (a) that the combined provocative test is adequate to separate normal and GH-deficient subjects; (b) the negative effect of obesity on GH secretion; (c) that obesity accounts for 25% of the reduction of GH release; and (d) that present cut-off values are applicable to normal weight, overweight and grade I obesity subjects, whereas in obese subjects with a BMI exceeding 35, all the normative limits of the GHRH-GHRP +6 test must be reduced by 5 microg/l.     

Comparison between insulin tolerance test,growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRH plus acipimox and GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in normal subjects,obese and hypopituitary patients

OBJECTIVE: It has been gradually realized that GH may have important physiological functions in adult humans. The biochemical diagnosis of adult GHD is established by provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin-tolerance test (ITT) is the best validated. The ITT has been challenged because of its low degree of reproducibility and lack of normal range, and is contra-indicated in common clinical situations. Furthermore, in severely obese subjects the response to the ITT frequently overlaps with those found in non-obese adult patients with GHD. DESIGN: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of four different stimuli of GH secretion: ITT, GHRH, GHRH plus acipimox (GHRH+Ac), and GHRH plus GHRP-6 (GHRH+GHRP-6), in two pathophysiological situations: hypopituitarism and obesity, and normal subjects. METHODS: Eight adults with hypopituitarism (four female, four male) aged 41-62 Years (48.8+/-1.4 Years), ten obese normal patients (five female, five male) aged 38-62 Years (48.1+/-2.5 Years), with a body mass index of 34.2+/-1.2 kg/m(2), and ten normal subjects (five female, five male) aged 33-62 Years (48.1+/-2.8 Years) were studied. Four tests were performed on each patient or normal subject: An ITT (0.1 U/kg, 0.15 U/kg for obese, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) preceded by acipimox (250 mg, orally, at -270 min and -60 min) (GHRH+Ac); and GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) plus GHRP-6 (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) (GHRH+GHRP-6). Serum GH was measured by radioimmunoassay. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon rank sum and by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: After the ITT the mean peak GH secretion was 1.5+/-0.3 microg/l for hypopituitary, 10.1+/-1.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 17.8+/-2.0 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH-induced GH secretion was 2+/-0.7 microg/l for hypopituitary, 3.9+/-1.2 microg/l (P=NS vs hypopituitary) for obese and 22.2+/-3.8 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. After GHRH+Ac, mean peak GH secretion was 3.3+/-1.4 microg/l for hypopituitary, 14.2+/-2.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 35.1+/-5.2 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH+GHRP-6 induced mean peak GH secretion of 4.1+/-0.9 microg/l for hypopituitary, 38.5+/-6.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 68.1+/-5.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal subjects. Individually considered, after ITT, GHRH or GHRH+Ac, the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal but higher than the minimal response in obese subjects. In contrast, after GHRH+GHRP-6 the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal and obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, in this group of patients, although both acipimox and GHRP-6 partially reverse the functional hyposomamotropism of obesity after GHRH, but are unable to reverse the organic hyposomatotropism of hypopituitarism, the combined test GHRH+GHRP-6 most accurately distinguishes both situations, without the side effects of ITT.     

Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults by testing with GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GHRH: comparison with the insulin tolerance test

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults should be made using provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is recommended as the gold standard investigation. Because of the risk of serious complications, patients with epilepsy or known ischemic heart disease should not undergo this test. GHRP-6 is a synthetic hexapeptide that releases GH by binding to specific hypothalamic and pituitary receptors. We assessed the diagnostic capability of GH stimulation by GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GHRH in comparison to the results of an ITT. DESIGN: Twenty patients underwent an ITT for suspected pituitary or adrenal disease. Either GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg) alone, or GHRP-6 in combination with GHRH (1 microg/kg) were administered on different days. Blood samples were obtained during a subsequent 90-min period for measurement of GH. RESULTS: Ten patients had a GH peak response of less than 3 microg/l during ITT and were considered growth hormone deficient (GHD). The GH mean peak (+/-S.E.M., range) in this group was 0.7 microg/l (+/-0.3, 0.1-2.9) compared with 14.5 microg/l (+/-3.5, 3.8-40.8) in the group of patients with a GH peak response of more than 3 microg/l (growth hormone sufficient (GS)). For the GHRP-6 test, the GH mean peak was 1.3 microg/l (+/-0.6, 0.1-6.7) in the GHD group versus 25.7 microg/l (+/-5.5, 7.7-54.2) in the GS group. After GHRP-6+GHRH, the GH mean peaks were 4.0 microg/l (+/-1.3, 0.2-11.9) versus 54.7 microg/l (+/-11.1, 13.9-136.0) respectively. During administration of GHRP-6, the only side effects observed were flush symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Peak GH levels below 7 microg/l for the GHRP-6 test and below 13 microg/l for the combined GHRP-6+GHRH test identified all patients with GH deficiency correctly as defined by ITT. The results suggest that testing with GHRP-6 or GHRP-6+GHRH is as sensitive and specific as an ITT for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency.     

Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency after pituitary surgery: the combined acipimox/GH-releasing hormone test

OBJECTIVE: Reduction of plasma free fatty acids leads to enhanced GH response after stimulation by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). We studied the clinical usefulness of combined administration of acipimox and GHRH for the diagnosis of GH deficiency. DESIGN: We evaluated 35 patients [mean age 53.0 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 26.7 kg/m2] after pituitary surgery. We compared GH responses after acipimox and GHRH with the GH response during an insulin tolerance test (ITT) and, in a subgroup of 12 patients, with the GHRH/arginine test. The acipimox/GHRH test was additionally performed in 21 control subjects (mean age 53.8 years; mean BMI 24.7 kg/m2). RESULTS: In the patients, the mean (+/- SEM) peak GH was almost four-fold higher after acipimox/GHRH (6.94 +/- 1.07 microg/l, range 0.46-23.1; P < 0.001) and after GHRH/arginine (8.32 +/- 1.23 microg/l, range 1.1-49.2; P < 0.001) than after ITT (1.84 +/- 0.46 microg/l, range 0.01-11.9). According to the ITT, 29 patients were severely GH deficient (peak GH < 3.0 microg/l). Peak GH levels after acipimox/GHRH in controls ranged from 7.5 to 78.4 microg/l (mean 29.3 +/- 3.5). GH peak values during the acipimox/GHRH test were significantly correlated with values from the ITT (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) and GHRH/arginine test (r = 0.87, P < 0.001). Areas under the curve were also correlated. According to generally accepted cut-off peak GH levels for the ITT and GHRH/arginine test, a GH peak exceeding 11.2 micro g/l excludes severe GH deficiency after acipimox/GHRH. Our control data indicate that the cut-off level is lower at older age. CONCLUSIONS: The acipimox/GHRH test leads to GH responses similar to those of the GHRH/arginine test, and to higher peak GH values if compared with the ITT. The acipimox/GHRH test is a potential additional tool to detect GH deficiency in patients with pituitary disease, in particular in patients with a perturbation of fatty acid metabolism.     

The effectiveness of arginine + GHRH test compared with GHRH + GHRP-6 test in diagnosing growth hormone deficiency in adults

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the performance of two novel tests in diagnosing growth hormone deficiency in adults. PATIENTS: Fifty patients presenting with long-standing hypopituitarism and two control groups consisting of 50 healthy subjects in each group [age-, sex- and body mass index (BMI)-matched] participated in a multicentre study. All underwent two provocative tests on different days within 3 months apart: (i) a combined GHRH + GHRP-6 test and (ii) arginine + GHRH test. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) for GHRH + GHRP-6 and arginine + GHRH tests in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. RESULTS: A peak GH level after GHRH + GHRP-6, under 15.0 microg/l had a sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 98.8% for diagnosing GHD and area under the ROC curve was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.95-0.99). For peak GH levels after arginine + GHRH, a level under 9.6 microg/l had a sensitivity of 88.4% and specificity of 95% and area under the ROC curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.91-0.98). The relationship between the increment in serum GH following GHRH + GHRP-6 and arginine + GHRH test was positive, i.e. r = 0.749, P = 0.001.Thus, there was high concordance between both tests. CONCLUSION: Both GHRH + GHRP-6 and/or arginine + GHRH test may serve as an alternative to the ITT in diagnosing GHD in adults.     

Growth hormone secretion and leptin in morbid obesity before and after biliopancreatic diversion: relationships with insulin and body composition

Obesity is characterized by increased leptin levels and insulin resistance, whereas blunted GH secretion is paired with normal, low, or high plasma IGF-I levels. To investigate body composition in human obesity and the interactions among the GH-IGF-I axis, leptin, and insulin resistance [measured with the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score], we studied 15 obese females, aged 23-54 yr (mean age, 42.7 +/- 2.6), with a body mass index (BMI) of 44.02 +/- 1.45 kg/m(2), who underwent treatment by biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), before and after surgery (16-24 months; BMI, 28.29 +/- 0.89 kg/m(2)). Our controls were 15 normal females, aged 28-54 yr (mean age, 40.8 +/- 2.3 yr), with a BMI of 27.52 +/- 0.53 kg/m(2). Insulin and leptin levels and HOMA scores were higher pre-BPD than in the controls. The GH response to GHRH was blunted, with a GH peak and GH area under the curve (AUC) significantly lower than those in controls. IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were also lower than control values. After surgery, BMI, fat mass, lean body mass, HOMA, insulin, and leptin significantly decreased. Furthermore, the GH response to GHRH severely increased; IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels did not significantly vary. Considering all subjects, correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between insulin and leptin, and a negative correlation between insulin and GH peak and between insulin and GH AUC. Regression analysis performed grouping pre- and post-BPD indicated that leptin and GH peak or AUC could best be predicted from insulin levels. The surgical treatment of severe obesity after stabilization of body weight decreases BMI and fat mass while preserving normal lean body mass as well as positively influencing insulin sensitivity and thus aiding the normalization of leptin levels. The insulin reduction may be mainly involved in the increase in the GH response to GHRH through various possible central and peripheral mechanisms while decreasing the peripheral sensitivity to GH itself, as shown by the stable nature of the IGF-I and IGFBP-3 values. Our findings suggest that the changes in insulin levels are the starting point for changes in both leptin levels and the somatotrope axis after BPD.     

Acute dexamethasone administration enhances GH responsiveness to GH releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) in man

OBJECTIVE: Acute administration of glucocorticoids stimulates GH secretion probably by a decrease in hypothalamic somatostatin release. GHRP-6 is a synthetic hexapeptide that increases GH secretion by a mechanism of action not yet fully known, but apparently not by inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of acute dexamethasone administration on GH responsiveness to GHRP-6 in man. DESIGN: One group of subjects received iv GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg), GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 100 microg), GHRH plus GHRP-6 or saline 3.5 h after oral acute dexamethasone administration (4 mg; at 0600 h). A second study group was treated with GHRP-6, GHRH or GHRP-6 plus GHRH after placebo ingestion, following the same protocol. PATIENTS: Sixteen normal subjects (mean age: 29 +/- 3.3 years), with normal BMI (22.4 +/- 2.0 kg/m2), were studied. Eight subjects received dexamethasone and the other eight were treated with placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH was measured by a two site monoclonal antibody immunofluorometric assay. RESULTS: In the placebo-treated subjects, mean peak GH (mU/l; mean +/- SE) and AUC (mU.min/l) values after GHRP-6 administration (peak: 43.8 +/- 9.0; AUC: 2262.0 +/- 459. 2) did not differ from those observed after GHRH injection (peak: 49. 8 +/- 12.0; AUC: 2903.4 +/- 872.6). The association of the two peptides markedly increased GH levels (peak: 172.4 +/- 34.2; AUC: 10393.0 +/- 1894.8) compared with the isolated administration of GHRP-6 or GHRH. In the subjects who received dexamethasone 3.5 h before saline injection, GH baseline values were significantly higher than those observed after 90 min of sampling (12.4 +/- 9.4 vs. 4.6 +/- 2.0). Mean GH peak and AUC values after GHRP-6 (peak: 78.8 +/- 11.0; AUC: 4114.6 +/- 588.2) and after GHRH administration (peak: 46.8 +/- 16.0; AUC: 3006.8 +/- 1010.0) did not differ significantly in the dexamethasone-treated subjects. In this study group, the administration of the two peptides together caused a significant increase in both peak (119.2 +/- 16.0) and AUC values (7377.0 +/- 937.2) compared with the response obtained after each peptide alone. When the two groups were compared, a significant increase in GH responsiveness to GHRP-6 was observed after dexamethasone administration compared with placebo. No differences in GH response to GHRH, or to the administration of the two peptides together, were seen between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral dexamethasone, at a dose of 4 mg, enhances GH releasing peptide-6-induced GH release when administered 3.5 h earlier. These results suggest that dexamethasone and GHRP-6 could act at different sites of GH releasing mechanisms. Further studies are necessary to elucidate these findings.     

Growth hormone status in morbidly obese subjects and correlation with body composition

Morbidly obese subjects are characterized by multiple endocrine abnormalities and these are paralleled by unfavorable changes in body composition. In obese individuals, either 24-h spontaneous or stimulated GH secretion is impaired without an organic pituitary disease and the severity of the secretory defect is proportional to the degree of obesity. The GHRH+arginine (GHRH+ARG) test is likely to be the overall test of choice in clinical practice to differentiate GH deficiency (GHD) patients. Similarly to other provocative tests, GHRH+ARG is influenced by obesity per se. Therefore, a new cut-off limit of peak GH response of 4.2 microg/l in obese subjects has been recently assumed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the reciprocal influence between decreased GH secretion and body composition in a group of 110 morbidly obese subjects, using the new cut-off limit of peak GH response to GHRH+ARG test for these subjects. In our study, GHD was identified in 27.3% of the obese subjects, without gender difference. In GDH obese subjects body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), fat mass (FM), and resistance (R) were higher while reactance (Xc), phase angle, body cell mass (BCM), IGF-I, or IGF-I z-scores were lower than in normal responders (p<0.001). In all obese subjects, GH peak levels showed a negative correlation with age, BMI, waist circumference and FM, and a positive correlation with IGF-I. In the stepwise multiple linear regression, waist circumference and FM were the major determinants of GH peak levels and IGF-I. In conclusion, using the new cut-off limit of peak GH response to GHRH+ARG test for obese subjects, about 1/3 morbidly obese subjects were GHD. GHD subjects showed a significantly different body composition compared with normal responders, and the secretory defect was correlated to different anthropometric variables with waist circumference and FM as the major determinants.     

The impact of cranial irradiation on GH responsiveness to GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6

Patients treated with cranial radiation are at risk of GH deficiency (GHD). We evaluated somatotroph responsiveness to maximal provocative tests exploring the GH releasable pool in relation to the impact of radiation damage to the hypothalamic-pituitary unit. The GH-releasing effect of GHRH plus GH secretagogue [GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6] (GHRH+GHRP-6) was studied in 22 adult patients (age, 23.2 +/- 1.4 yr; 8 female and 14 male; mean body mass index, 22.6 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2)) who received cranial radiation for primary brain tumor distant from hypothalamic-pituitary region 7.6 +/- 0.7 yr before GH testing. Two stimulatory tests for GH secretion were employed: insulin tolerance test (ITT, 0.15 IU/kg regular insulin i.v. bolus); and GHRH+GHRP-6 test: GHRH (Geref Serono, Madrid, Spain; l microg/kg) plus GHRP-6 (CLINALFA, Laufelingen, Switzerland; 1 microg/kg) as i.v. bolus. Serum GH was measured (Delphia; Perkin Elmer, Wallac, Turku, Finland) at -30, -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Anterior pituitary function was normal in all except in 1 female with hyperprolactinemia. Twelve out of 22 irradiated patients were GH-deficient (GHD) with both tests. Eleven out of 22 (50%) irradiated patients were severely GHD, according to the ITT (GH < 3 microg/liter; mean GH peak, 1.5 +/- 0.5 microg/liter). In 9 irradiated patients, in whom ITT was performed as well, mean peak GH after the GHRH+GHRP-6 test was 6.2 +/- 0.8 microg/liter, which is considered as severe GHD, according to our own cut-off for the test (peak GH < 10 microg/liter). GH responses to both tests were highly concordant, but the differential in the GH peak concentrations between GHD and non-GHD irradiated patients was significantly larger for the GHRH+GHRP-6 test than that for the ITT. The 2 discordant responses, i.e. poor response to the ITT and good response to the GHRH+GHRP-6 test, were found in 1 hyperprolactinemic female patient and in 1 other female. One irradiated patient was diagnosed as GHD only with the combined test, because ITT was contraindicated because of epilepsy. PRL and cortisol responses to ITT were normal in all irradiated patients and did not depend on the GH status. IGF-I levels were not informative or discriminative between the GHD and non-GHD irradiated adult patients. In conclusion, the use of GH secretagogues plus GHRH is an easy, reliable and accurate way of assessing GH secretion in cranially irradiated patients. Impairment of the GH releasable pool in the irradiated patients, with a maximal provocative test, reflects alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary unit caused by radiotherapy.     

Impairment of GH responsiveness to combined GH-releasing hormone and arginine administration in adult patients with Prader-Willi syndrome

OBJECTIVE: It is unclear if poor health outcomes of adult patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) are influenced by GH deficiency (GHD). Few studies have been focused on PWS adults, but further information on the concomitant role of obesity on GH/IGF-I axis function is needed. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of GHD in a large group of adult subjects with genetically confirmed PWS. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: We studied the GH response to a combined administration of GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v. at 0 minutes) and arginine (ARG) (30 g i.v., infused from 0 to 30 minutes) as well as the baseline IGF-I levels, in a group of 44 PWS adults (18 males, 26 females) aged 18-41.1 years. The same protocol was carried out in a control group of 17 obese subjects (7 males, 10 females) aged 21.8-45.8 years. MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples were taken at -15 and 0 minutes and then 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after GHRH administration. Serum GH and total IGF-I concentrations were measured by chemioluminescence. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test for unpaired data, and using analysis of variance for parametric and nonparametric (Mann-Whitney test) data, where appropriate. The relationship between pairs of variables was assessed by Pearson's correlation. Independent variables influencing GH secretion were tested by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The GH response to GHRH + ARG was significantly lower in PWS patients (GH peak (mean +/- SE) 8.4 +/- 1.2 microg/l; AUC: 471.4 +/- 77.8 microg/l/h) than obese subjects (GH peak 15.7 +/- 2.9 microg/l, P < 0.02; AUC 956 +/- 182.9 microg/l/h, P < 0.005). When considered individually, 17 of 44 PWS individuals (38.6%) were severely GHD, according to the cut-off limit of 4.1 microg/l for obese individuals, and low IGF-I-values were present in 33 PWS patients. Moreover, impaired GH response was combined with subnormal IGF-I levels in all PWS patients with GHD. CONCLUSIONS: Adult subjects with PWS had a reduced responsiveness to GHRH + ARG administration associated with reduced IGF-I levels. In addition, a severe GHD for age was demonstrated in a significant percentage of PWS subjects. These findings are in agreement with the hypothesis that a complex derangement of hypothalamus-pituitary axis occurred in PWS, and suggested that impaired GH secretion is not an artefact of obesity.     

A paradoxical gender dissociation within the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor I axis during protracted critical illness

Female gender appears to protect against adverse outcome from prolonged critical illness, a condition characterized by blunted and disorderly GH secretion and impaired anabolism. As a sexual dimorphism in the GH secretory pattern of healthy humans and rodents determines gender differences in metabolism, we here compared GH secretion and responsiveness to GH secretagogues in male and female protracted critically ill patients. GH secretion was quantified by deconvolution analysis and approximate entropy estimates of 9-h nocturnal time series in 9 male and 9 female patients matched for age (mean +/- SD, 67+/-11 and 67+/-15 yr), body mass index, severity and duration of illness, feeding, and medication. Serum concentrations of PRL, TSH, cortisol, and sex steroids were measured concomitantly. Serum levels of GH-binding protein, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), and PRL were compared with those of 50 male and 50 female community-living control subjects matched for age and body mass index. In a second study, GH responses to GHRH (1 microg/kg), GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2; 1 microg/ kg) and GHRH plus GHRP-2 (1 and 1 microg/kg) were examined in comparable, carefully matched male (n = 15) and female (n = 15) patients. Despite identical mean serum GH concentrations, total GH output, GH half-life, and number of GH pulses, critically ill men paradoxically presented with less pulsatile (mean +/- SD pulsatile GH fraction, 39+/-14% vs. 67+/-20%; P = 0.002) and more disorderly (approximate entropy, 0.946+/-0.113 vs. 0.805+/-0.147; P = 0.02) GH secretion than women. Serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and acid-labile subunit (ALS) levels were low in patients compared with controls, with male patients revealing lower IGF-I (P = 0.01) and ALS (P = 0.005) concentrations than female patients. Correspondingly, circulating IGF-I and ALS levels correlated positively with pulsatile (but not with nonpulsatile) GH secretion. Circulating levels of GH-binding protein and IGFBP-1, -2, and -6 were higher in patients than controls, without a detectable gender difference. In female patients, PRL levels were 3-fold higher, and TSH and cortisol tended to be higher than levels in males. In both genders, estrogen levels were more than 3-fold higher than normal, and testosterone (2.25+/-1.94 vs. 0.97+/-0.39 nmol/L; P = 0.03) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations were low. In male patients, low testosterone levels were related to reduced GH pulse amplitude (r = 0.91; P = 0.0008). GH responses to GHRH were relatively low and equal in critically ill men and women (7.3+/-9.4 vs. 7.8+/-4.1 microg/L; P = 0.99). GH responses to GHRP-2 in women (93+/-38 microg/L) were supranormal and higher (P<0.0001) than those in men (28+/-16 microg/L). Combining GHRH with GHRP-2 nullified this gender difference (77+/-58 in men vs. 120+/-69 microg/L in women; P = 0.4). In conclusion, a paradoxical gender dissociation within the GH/ IGF-I axis is evident in protracted critical illness, with men showing greater loss of pulsatility and regularity within the GH secretory pattern than women (despite indistinguishable total GH output) and concomitantly lower IGF-I and ALS levels. Less endogenous GHRH action in severely ill men compared with women, possibly due to profound hypoandrogenism, accompanying loss of the putative endogenous GHRP-like ligand action with prolonged stress in both genders may explain these novel findings.     

Acute decrease in circulating T3 levels enhances, but does not normalise, the GH response to GHRP-6 plus GHRH in thyrotoxicosis

In thyrotoxicosis there is an impaired GH response to GHRH, normal GH responsiveness to GHRP-6 and lack of synergistic GH response after simultaneous administration of both peptides. We have previously shown that the GHRH-induced GH release in these patients increases after an acute reduction of circulating T3 values with administration of iopanoic acid, a compound that inhibits peripheral conversion of T4 to T3. We have now studied the effect of a decrease in serum T3 levels on the GH response to GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg) plus GHRH (100 microg) in 9 hyperthyroid patients before and after 15 days of treatment with iopanoic acid (3 g every 3 days) and propylthiouracil (600 mg/day). Nine normal subjects were also studied. In all hyperthyroid patients iopanoic acid induced a rapid decrease and normalisation of serum T3 levels. In these subjects peak GH (microg/l; mean +/- SE) and AUC (microg/l x 120 min) values after GHRP-6 plus GHRH were significantly higher on day 15 compared to pretreatment values (peak, 18.3 +/- 3.0 vs 13.4 +/- 1.9; AUC, 1227.9 +/- 212.9 vs 968.5 +/- 160.4; p<0.05). Despite the significant enhancement of the GH responsiveness to GHRP-6 plus GHRH after treatment with iopanoic acid, this response remained significantly blunted when compared to controls both in terms of peak GH (18.3 +/- 3.0 vs 83.7 +/- 15.2; p<0.05) and AUC values (1227.9 +/- 212.9 vs 4956.5 +/- 889.3; p<0.05). In conclusion, our results show that an acute decrease of circulating T3 levels enhances, but does not normalise, the GH response to GHRP-6 plus GHRH in thyrotoxicosis. This could suggest that circulating T3 does not have a major role in the mechanisms involved in the synergistic effect of these peptides.     

Sustained elevation of pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and IGFBP-5 concentrations during 30-day continuous subcutaneous infusion of GH-releasing peptide-2 in older men and women

We test the interlinked hypotheses that in healthy older adults: 1). i.v. injection of GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) and GHRH synergizes more in aging women than men; 2). sc infusion of both GHRP-2 (1 microg/kg.h = 1) and GHRH (1, 3, or 10) for 24 h augments GH secretion more than either agonist alone; and 3). continuous sc delivery of GHRP-2 (1) for 30 d stimulates daily GH secretion and IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and IGFBP-5. Acute two-peptide synergy was 3-fold greater in young (n = 16) than older volunteers (n = 17; P < 0.025) and was 2.3-fold higher in elderly women than men (P < 0.025). The 24-h infusion of GHRP-2 (1) combined with GHRH (3 or 10) in men and with GHRH (10) in women drove GH secretion more than GHRH alone (P 相似文献   

Growth hormone levels in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adulthood

Current guidelines for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) state that the diagnosis must be proven biochemically by provocative testing that is done within the appropriate clinical context. The need for reliance on provocative testing is based on evidence that the evaluation of spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion over 24 h and the measurement of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels do not distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. Regarding IGF-I, it has been demonstrated that very low levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (i.e., patients with childhood-onset, severe GHD, or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood) may be considered definitive evidence for severe GHD obviating the need for provocative tests. However, normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD and therefore adults suspected for GHD and with normal IGF-I levels must undergo a provocative test of GH secretion. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the test of choice, with severe GHD being defined by a GH peak less than 3 microg/l, the cut-off that distinguishes normal from GHD adults. The ITT is contraindicated in the presence of ischemic heart disease, seizure disorders, and in the elderly. Other tests are as reliable as the ITT, provided they are used with appropriate cut-off limits. Glucagon stimulation, a classical test, and especially new maximal tests such as GHRH in combination with arginine or GHS (i.e., GHRP-6) have well-defined cut-off limits, are reproducible, are independent of age and gender, and are able to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. The confounding effect of overweight or obesity on the interpretation of the GH response to provocative tests needs to be considered as the somatotropic response to all stimuli is negatively correlated with body mass index. Appropriate cut-offs for lean, overweight, and obese subjects must be used in order to avoid false-positive diagnoses of severe GHD in obese adults.     

Assessment of GH/IGF-I axis in obesity by evaluation of IGF-I levels and the GH response to GHRH+arginine test.

The GH response to provocative stimuli in obese is often as low as in panhypopituitaric patients with severe GHD; however, IGF-I levels are normal or slightly reduced. In 53 patients with simple obesity (11 M and 42 F, age: 40.3+/-1.6 yr, BMI: 39.1+/-1.0 Kg/m2), we evaluated the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg iv)+arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv), and total IGF-I levels. The mean (+/-SE) GH peak after GHRH+ARG was markedly lower (74% reduction, p<0.0001) in obese (16.8+/-2.0 microg/l) than in normal subjects (62.7+/-4.3 microg/l). IGF-I levels in obese patients (134.0+/-7.6 microg/l) were lower (33% reduction, p<0.001) than in normal subjects (200.8+/-5.7 microg/l). Taking into account the 3rd centile limit of normal response, the GH response to GHRH+ARG was reduced in 62.3% (33/53) of the obese patients, and 21.2% (7/33) of them had low IGF-I levels. Assuming the 1st centile limit, it was reduced in 33.9% (18/53) obese subjects, and 22% (4/18) of them had low IGF-I levels. Considering 3.0 microg/L as arbitrary cut-off, the GH response was reduced in 5.7% (3/53) of the obese patients, and still one of them had low IGF-I levels. Our findings: a) confirm that the secretory capacity of somatotroph cells is often deeply impaired in obesity; b) demonstrate that IGF-I assay generally rules out severe impairment of GH/IGF-I axis in obese patients with marked reduction of the GH secretion; c) indicate that the percentage of obese patients with concomitant reduction of GH secretion and IGF-I levels is not negligible. Thus, IGF-I assay should be routinely performed in obese patients; those presenting with low IGF-I levels should undergo further evaluation of their hypothalamo-pituitary function and morphology, particularly in the presence of empty sella.     

Growth-hormone response to combined stimulation with GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome before and after short-term fasting

Controversial data were reported on GH response to different provocative stimuli in obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The objective of our study was to assess the effect of short-term fasting on GH response to combined stimulus with GHRH+GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) in obese patients with PCOS and possible relation with leptin and insulin changes during fasting. Twelve obese PCOS women and nine obese control women participated in 3-day fasting. GH response, IGF-I, insulin and leptin were measured after GHRH+ GHRP-6, before and after short-term fasting. Obese PCOS patients had significantly greater GH peak after GHRH+GHRP-6 before fasting. Enhanced response to GH stimulation was found after fasting without substantial differences between obese PCOS and obese controls. Insulin and leptin significantly decreased, while insulin sensitivity significantly improved in both groups during fasting. In conclusion, obese PCOS patients have peculiar type of GH response to GHRH+GHRP-6 before fasting, possibly due to enhanced sensitivity of somatotrophs. Observed changes in insulin and leptin may participate in modulation of enhanced GH response after short-term fasting to GHRH+GHRP-6 in PCOS and obese controls.     

Boxing as a sport activity associated with isolated GH deficiency

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has long been known as a cause of hypopituitarism, and it is characterized by a high prevalence of neuroendocrine abnormalities. Boxing, one of the most common combative sports, may also result in TBI. As far as we know, pituitary functions including GH status have not been investigated in boxers. Therefore, in this preliminary study, we have assessed the pituitary functions in boxers. Eleven actively competing or retired male boxers with a mean age of 38.0 +/- 3.6 yr and 7 age-, sex- and BMI-matched healthy non-boxing controls were included in the study. Biochemical and basal hormonal parameters including IGF-I levels were measured. To assess GH secretory status in boxers and healthy controls, GHRH (1 microg/kg)+GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg) test was performed. After GHRH+GHRP-6 test, mean peak GH level in boxers and in controls were 10.9 +/- 1.7 and 41.4 +/- 6.7 microg/l, respectively (p < 0.05). Peak GH levels in 5 (45%) boxers were found to be lower than 10 microg/l and considered as severe GH deficient. In the control group, mean IGF-1 levels (367 +/- 18.8 ng/ml) were significantly higher than that obtained in boxers (237 +/- 23.3 ng/dl) (p < 0.01). All the other pituitary hormones were normal including ADH as no signs and symptoms of diabetes insipidus. There was a significant negative correlation between peak GH levels and boxing duration, and between peak GH levels and number of bouts. In conclusion, we think that boxing is a cause of TBI, and GH deficiency is very common among boxers. Further studies including large number of boxers, both professional and amateur, are needed to clarify pituitary dysfunction in boxers.     

Reduction of free fatty acids by acipimox enhances the growth hormone (GH) responses to GH-releasing peptide 2 in elderly men

GH release is increased by reducing circulating free fatty acids (FFAs). Aging is associated with decreased plasma GH concentrations. We evaluated GH releasing capacity in nine healthy elderly men after administration of GH-releasing peptide 2 (GHRP-2), with or without pretreatment with the antilipolytic drug acipimox, and compared the GHRP-2-induced GH release with the response to GHRH. The area under the curve (AUC) of the GH response after GHRP-2 alone was 4.8 times higher compared with GHRH alone (1834 +/- 255 vs. 382 +/- 78 microg/L.60 min, P: < 0.001). Acipimox, which reduced FFAs from 607 micromol/L to 180 micromol/L, increased the GH AUC to 1087 after GHRH and to 2956 microg/L.60 min after GHRP-2 (P: < 0.01). The AUC after acipimox/GHRP-2 were positively correlated with the AUC after GHRP-2 alone (r = 0.93, P: < 0.01); this was also observed between acipimox/GHRH and GHRH alone (r = 0.73, P: = 0.03). Significant negative correlations were observed between basal FFAs and AUC after GHRH or GHRP-2 after combining the data with and without acipimox (r = 0.58, P: = 0.01 and r = 0.48, P: = 0.04, respectively), and between basal FFAs and GH at t = 0 (r = -0.44, P: = 0.001). Interestingly, GHRP-2 administration was followed by a significant early rise in plasma FFAs by 60% (P = 0.01), indicating an acute lipolytic effect. In conclusion, reduction of circulating FFAs strongly enhances GHRP-2-stimulated GH release in elderly men. The data indicate that the decreased GH release associated with aging can be reversed by acipimox and that the pituitary GH secretory capacity in elderly men is still sufficient.     

Growth hormone responses to GH-releasing peptide (GHRP-6) in hypothyroidism

OBJECTIVE Both spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion are reduced in patients with hypothyroidism. The mechanisms involved in these alterations are not yet fully understood. GHRP-6 is a synthetic hexapeptide that releases GH both in vivo and in vitro. Its mechanism of action is unknown, but there is evidence that this peptide acts as a functional somatostatin antagonist at pituitary level. The aim of this study was to evaluate the GH response to GHRP-6 in patients with primary hypothyroidism and in normal controls. DESIGN Patients with hypothyroidism and normal controls were randomly submitted to 3 tests with GHRH (100 μg i.v.), GHRP-6 (1 μg/kg i.v.) and GHRH + GHRP-6, on separate days. PATIENTS Eleven patients with primary hypothyroidism were compared with 10 control subjects. MEASUREMENTS GH, TSH and free T4 were measured by immunofluorometric assay and IGF-I by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS Hypothyroid patients had markedly lower peak GH values (mean ± SE μg/l) after GHRH administration (4.1 ± 0.9) compared to control subjects (24.9 ± 5.1). After GHRP-6 injection hypothyroid patients had a significantly higher GH release (12.6 ± 1.9) than that obtained with GHRH, while in control subjects GH values were similar (22.1 ± 3.6). No significant differences in peak GH responses were observed following the administration of either GHRP-6 alone (controls 22.1 ± 3.6; patients 12.6 ± 1.9) or in combination with GHRH (controls 77.4 ± 15.0; patients 52.8 ± 10.9), despite the trend to smaller responses in hypothyroid patients. CONCLUSION We have shown that patients with primary hypothyroidism have higher GH responses to GHRP-6 than to GHRH, which are markedly blunted. When GHRP-6 was associated with GHRH, a significant increase in the GH response was observed in these patients, which could suggest a role for somatostatin in this process. Our data suggest that thyroid hormones modulate GH release induced by GHRH and GHRP-6 through different mechanisms. However, additional studies are necessary to further elucidate this hypothesis.     

Physical activity or food intake prior to testing did not affect the reproducibility of GH secretion elicited by GH releasing hormone plus GH-releasing hexapeptide in normal adult subjects

OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults is a defined syndrome of which the adverse effects on different areas of body function are reversed under replacement therapy with GH. The diagnosis of GHD is controversial in adults, relying on the GH secretion elicited by the so-called provocative tests of GH reserve. Most of the tests in use, including the widely employed insulin tolerance test, have been shown to be blunted after daily activities, such as mild exercise, heat or food intake, which makes stringent testing conditions mandatory in order to assure reproducibility. The combined administration of GH releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) is a very effective test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. In the present study, the perturbatory action of mild physical activity and food intake on the reproducibility of this combined test was assessed. METHODS: Seventeen healthy volunteers of both sexes were tested twice on separate occasions with the sequential administration of GHRH (90 microg i.v.) plus GHRP-6 (90 microg i.v.) as bolus. Eleven subjects underwent the first combined test in the morning under basal conditions and the second test was performed in the afternoon of the same day after a morning of habitual working activity and after a standard lunch. Another group of six subjects underwent similar double testing in the morning and in the afternoon after morning activity followed by lunch; however, both tests were separated by a period of 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: GH levels were analysed by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay, with sampling every 15 minutes. RESULTS: The reproducibility of the GHRH + GHRP-6 test performed on the same day was high, with the mean GH peak being 65.4 +/- 8.0 microg/l in the basal state and 51.2 +/- 9.6 microg/l after lunch, while the area under the curve (AUC) was 2287 +/- 288 microg/l per 45 minutes in the morning and 1759 +/- 350 after lunch. When a period of 6 months had elapsed between the first and the second test, the reproducibility was well maintained with a mean GH peak of 42.7 +/- 6.2 microg/l in the basal state and 34.3 +/- 3.6 microg/l in the after lunch test, with the AUC 1463 +/- 209 and 1164 +/- 106 microg/l per 45 minutes in the morning and after lunch, respectively. When analysed individually, physical activity, lunch or time elapsed between the two tests did not significantly change the GH peak in the subjects tested. CONCLUSIONS: The GHRH + GHRP-6 test of GH reserve is a highly reproducible test in adult subjects over time, and is not perturbed by common daily activities, such as mild physical exercise or food intake. Considering that stringent testing conditions are not required and the whole test may be performed in 30 minutes, it may be useful in the clinical setting for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults.