Cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: quo vadis?

Two-thirds of women who are newly diagnosed with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer present with stage III or IV disease.The preferred initial treatment has traditionally consisted of primary surgical debulking followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. However, recent data suggesting comparable efficacy for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking have challenged this conventional dogma. Most patients with advanced ovarian cancer will achieve remission regardless of initial treatment, but 80% to 90% of patients will ultimately relapse. The timing and clinical benefit of a second debulking operation for recurrent disease is even more contentious. This article focuses on the recent debate regarding when--or whether--patients with ovarian cancer should undergo aggressive surgical resection.     

Cancer statistics 2001: quo vadis or whither goest thou?

In his first Guest Editorial for CA as newly elected President of the American Cancer Society, Dr. Dileep Bal moves beyond the encouraging trends reported in the annual cancer statistics article to target areas for future efforts and improvement. Noting that resources and the public health activities of local, regional, and national medical communities should focus on cancer prevention, screening and early detection/treatment, technology transfer, and research, Dr. Bal emphasizes the feasibility of the 2015 goals set by the ACS: A 25% reduction in cancer incidence and a 50% reduction in mortality from cancer.     

Models of breast cancer: quo vadis, animal modeling?

Rodent models for breast cancer have for many decades provided unparalleled insights into cellular and molecular aspects of neoplastic transformation and tumorigenesis. Despite recent improvements in the fidelity of genetically engineered mice, rodent models are still being criticized by many colleagues for not being 'authentic' enough to the human disease. Motives for this criticism are manifold and range from a very general antipathy against the rodent model system to well-founded arguments that highlight physiological variations between species. Newly proposed differences in genetic pathways that cause cancer in humans and mice invigorated the ongoing discussion about the legitimacy of the murine system to model the human disease. The present commentary intends to stimulate a debate on this subject by providing the background about new developments in animal modeling, by disputing suggested limitations of genetically engineered mice, and by discussing improvements but also ambiguous expectations on the authenticity of xenograft models to faithfully mimic the human disease.     

Does continuous-infusion interleukin-2 increase survival in metastatic melanoma?

Pharmacy logbooks and clinical trial records were used to identify all 60 patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated as inpatients with intermediate-dose, continuous-infusion interleukin-2 (IL-2) in Hoag Hospital during 1987 to 1998. The hospital tumor registry was used to identify contemporary controls who had not received inpatient IL-2, matched for having distant metastatic melanoma, and by year and stage at original diagnosis, gender, and age. The mean time from original diagnosis to the documentation of distant metastatic disease was similar in both groups, 24 to 26 months. From the date of starting IL-2 therapy, patients had a median survival of 8.8 months, 38% 1-year survival, and 20% 5-year survival, with 8 patients alive beyond 5 years. However, there was no difference in survival from the first date of distant metastatic disease (median 25.8 months for IL-2 versus 31.5 months for controls, with survival rates 5 years after metastatic disease of 26% versus 31%). There was also no difference in overall survival from the date of original diagnosis (60.1 months for the IL-2 group versus 86.3 months for controls, with 5-year survival rates of 51% versus 64%, and 10-year survival rates of 29% versus 33%). This single-institution study failed to establish a survival advantage for patients with metastatic melanoma who received intermediate-dose, continuous-infusion IL-2 administered in the inpatient setting, compared to contemporary, matched-control patients who never received inpatient IL-2 therapy. However, the 5-year survival rates after a diagnosis of distant metastatic disease were a surprisingly high 26% to 31% in both groups. In the absence of a control group, the survival impact of IL-2 has probably been overestimated from single-arm phase II and III trials.     

Re-evaluating the role of dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: what have we learned in 30 years?

Since dacarbazine was approved for treating metastatic melanoma in the 1970s, numerous studies have evaluated whether different schedules and dacarbazine-based combinations improve clinical outcomes. This evidence-based review shows that combining dacarbazine with other drugs having single-agent activity and/or hormonal or immunotherapeutic compounds fails to provide clinically meaningful improvements in survival, and may increase toxicity. In patients with metastatic melanoma, dacarbazine was previously administered in cycles of multiple consecutive daily infusions per cycle. The introduction of potent antiemetics, together with concerns relating to patient comfort and clinic utilisation time, has enabled regimens involving single-dose dacarbazine, administered at the same total dose per cycle. These appear to be as effective as multiple-dose schedules, are well tolerated, and are more straightforward to administer. Single-administration dacarbazine (850-1000 mg/m2), once every 3 weeks, is currently the standard reference therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. New effective therapies are urgently needed for this treatment-refractory disease.     

Complex combination biochemotherapy regimen in advanced metastatic melanoma in a non-intensive care unit: toxicity or benefit?

BACKGROUND: There is currently no chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy regimen that has shown impact on survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. Different biochemotherapy protocols showed promise with high response rates, but again without significant impact on survival. METHODS: We report the results of a retrospective analysis of a regimen consisting of dacarbazine, cisplatin, vindesine, interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha2b in 25 consecutively treated patients with regard to toxicity, efficacy and practicability. The treatment was performed on a regular dermatological ward. RESULTS: Grade III and IV toxicities were mainly haematological, with few cases of infection because of neutropenia seen. Best overall responses were CR 2/25, PR 2/25 and SD 9/25. The median progression free interval was 4 months (range 0-19) for all patients and the median survival time was 12 months (range 2-26). From a safety and practical point of view, there was no draw-back on treating patients in a non-intensive care unit. The median survival time is in the range of the one reported for monochemotherapy regimen. While there are some responding patients, the responses are short lived and go in parallel with high toxicity and impaired performance status. CONCLUSION: This complex and highly toxic chemoimmunotherapeutic regimen should not be considered as standard therapy in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.     

Tamoxifen in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma: still a controversy? (Review).

This review attempts to summarize the available preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the inclusion of tamoxifen (TAM) in the treatment of malignant melanoma, in the attempt to identify what role, if any, the antiestrogen could have in the present and future therapeutic approach to this disease. Emphasis has been given to the biological basis of the potential TAM mechanisms of action, as well as to the rational basis underlying the study design of the reported clinical experiences. Results to date show that TAM has no useful activity as a single agent in melanoma patients, most published response rates reaching less than 10%. A still controversial question is the inclusion of the antiestrogen in different active chemotherapy regimens, since clinical investigations on the role of TAM in combination therapy of advanced melanoma have produced inconclusive results. While several early trials suggested that TAM may improve the response rates when combined with different cytotoxic agents, the majority of subsequent reports, including recent randomized studies, did not show a significant benefit stemming from TAM addition to various single-agent or multi-agent combinations. Only one controlled trial showed a significant improvement in both response rate and survival for patients receiving dacarbazine plus TAM, an effect primarily noted in women, and confirmatory studies have not been reported. From a biological standpoint, why the activity of this poorly effective single-agent is potentiated when given in combination with some cytotoxic agents is not clearly understood, although preclinical and clinical experiences support a possible synergistic effect of TAM combined with cisplatin, particularly when the former is added at high doses. Of major interest is a body of experimental studies producing confirmatory data that induction of apoptosis, probably through the inhibition of protein kinase C, as well angiogenesis inhibition, at least in part mediated by TGF-beta stimulation, are alternative ways through which TAM suppresses tumor cell growth, independently of the expression of estrogen receptors. These findings also provide a model and rationale for combining TAM with agents which are able to modify cell biology in melanoma. The investigation on TAM-containing biological combinations appears to be a promising avenue to be explored in the near future. To this end, clinical research should incorporate biological studies to allow the selection of subgroups of patients who are most likely to benefit from TAM-based treatment.     

Isolated melanoma in the lung where there is no known primary site: metastatic disease or primary lung tumour?

Patients with no history of melanoma occasionally present with apparently metastatic melanoma in the lungs, but have no evidence of a primary melanoma. The aims of this study were to investigate the role of surgical resection in the treatment of such patients, and to examine the evidence for a diagnosis of primary pulmonary melanoma in each case. Patients with an unknown primary melanoma who presented with pulmonary disease and subsequently underwent surgical resection were identified from the Sydney Melanoma Unit database. Fifteen patients fulfilled the study criteria. Multiple lesions were present in four. Eight wedge resections and 10 lobectomies were performed. The patients' median survival was 32 months and the 5-year actuarial survival was 42%. This compares with the overall Sydney Melanoma Unit experience of lung resection for melanoma in 83 patients, where the median survival was 19 months and the 5-year survival was 22%. Resection of pulmonary disease in melanoma patients with an unknown primary lesion can result in long-term survival, and even apparent cure. It is possible that some of the patients in this series had primary melanoma of the lung, but this is impossible to prove.     

Bone morphogenetic proteins in melanoma: Angel or devil?

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily serving multiple functions in many cell and tissue types including proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, chemotaxis, angiogenesis, and matrix production during embryogenic development as well as in adult life. Despite the tremendous progress in delineating functional derangements of BMP pathways in carcinogenesis during the last decade, the biological significance of BMPs in human melanoma has received very little attention. It is now clear that biological responses to BMPs are cell type-specific and divergent effects, i.e., both oncogenic and tumor suppressor activities, have been described. Thus, knowledge generated in one system may not translate directly to another. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of BMP signaling in various human cancers and discuss original data pertaining to cutaneous melanoma obtained in our laboratory.