Background
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is common with bariatric surgery. We examined the PONV rate in bariatric surgical patients who received triple antiemetic prophylaxis (dexamethasone, droperidol, and ondansetron) with and without antiemetic aprepitant.Methods
Medical records of female patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery from January 1, 2014, to July 28, 2016, were reviewed for PONV episodes during 48 postoperative hours.Results
In total, 338 patients received triple antiemetic, of whom 172 (51%) also received aprepitant. Rates of PONV in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) among patients with and without aprepitant therapy were 11 vs 17% (P = .09). Within 1 h after PACU discharge, fewer patients in the aprepitant group had PONV (19 vs 31%; odds ratio [OR] [95% CI], 0.5 [0.30–0.80]; P = .007). During the first 48 postoperative hours, PONV rates were similar between the groups (68 and 66%; P = .73), but fewer emesis episodes occurred in the aprepitant group (6 vs 13%; OR [95% CI], 0.45 [0.21–0.95]; P = .04). Analyses were also performed with a subset of patients matched on propensity for receiving aprepitant. In this subset, OR estimates quantifying aprepitant effect on PONV were similar to those obtained from multivariable regression analyses.Conclusion
Addition of aprepitant to a multimodal antiemetic prophylactic regimen may be associated with significant reduction of PONV during early recovery and potentially with reduced incidence of vomiting during the first 48 postoperative hours. The high PONV rate in the first 48 postoperative hours is suggestive that introduction of scheduled anti-PONV prophylactic treatment may be desirable.Methods: Sixty-eight women premedicated with midazolam were randomly allocated to coinduction with intravenous clonidine (group C) or placebo (group P) in this prospective, double-blind study. Anesthesia was standardized (laryngeal mask airway, fentanyl, propofol, sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen). Hemodynamic parameters and the requirements for propofol, sevoflurane, and the postoperative need for ketobemidone were noted. The primary endpoints studied were the number of PONV-free patients and patient satisfaction with respect to PONV.
Results: Patients in group C had a significantly reduced need for propofol (P < 0.04) and sevoflurane (P < 0.01) and a reduced early need for ketobemidone (P < 0.04). There were significantly more PONV-free patients in group C compared with group P (20 and 11 of 30, respectively;P < 0.04). The number needed to treat was 3.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.8, 16.9). Intraoperative blood pressure, postoperative heart rate, and postoperative blood pressure were all significantly lower in group C compared with group P, but were not considered to be of clinical importance. No negative side effects were recorded. 相似文献
Methods: Data were collected alongside a randomized clinical trial that investigated the incidence of PONV in patients anesthetized with either inhalation anesthesia or total intravenous anesthesia. A subset of 808 consecutive patients participating in the trial completed WTP questionnaires 1 day before and 2 weeks after surgery. The outcome measure was the maximum amount of money that patients were willing to pay for "perfect" antiemetics and analgesics. Preoperative WTP and individual WTP changes after surgery were analyzed in relation to baseline characteristics and postoperative pain and PONV experiences.
Results: Prevention of postoperative pain was valued higher than prevention of PONV. The median preoperative WTP for analgesics was US $35 (interquartile range, $7-69) vs. US $17 (interquartile range, $7-69) for antiemetics. Individual WTP changes for antiemetics were not related to PONV experience, whereas severe postoperative pain (numerical rating score >= 8) was associated with an increase in the WTP for analgesics. 相似文献
Method: The authors observed 180 children, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, 2-12 yr of age, who were undergoing strabismus repair. After induction of anesthesia with halothane and nitrous oxide in oxygen or intravenous thiopental, children received either placebo (saline) or intravenous ondansetron in doses of 25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 [mu]g/kg (n = 30). The trachea was intubated and ventilation was controlled. Perioperative analgesic and fluid requirements were standardized. Episodes of nausea and vomiting were recorded for the first 24 h postoperatively. Data such as nonsurrogate (parental satisfaction scores and duration of postanesthesia care unit stay) and therapeutic (numbers needed to prevent and harm) outcome measures were collected.
Results: The incidences of PONV in the placebo and 25-, 50-, 75-, 100-, and 150-[mu]g/kg ondansetron groups were 83, 77, 47, 30, 30, and 27%, respectively. The incidence was less in the 75- (P = 0.002), 100- (P = 0.002), and 150-[mu]g/kg (P < 0.001) ondansetron groups compared with placebo. Duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit was shorter in the 75-, 100-, and 150-[mu]g/kg ondansetron groups (P < 0.002) compared with the placebo group. Parental assessment scores for the child's perioperative experience and the positive number needed to prevent PONV were also better and favorable in the 75-, 100-, and 150-[mu]g/kg ondansetron groups compared with the placebo group. The incidence (P > 0.99) and severity (P = 0.63) of PONV were similar in the 75- and 150-[mu]g/kg ondansetron groups. Surrogate, nonsurrogate, and therapeutic outcome measures revealed that 75 [mu]g/kg ondansetron provided the same benefits as did 100 and 150 [mu]g/kg. 相似文献
Background
Patients undergoing ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia experience considerable levels of postoperative nausea and vomiting (N/V) after their discharge. However, those complications have not been thoroughly investigated in hand surgery patients yet. We investigated factors associated with postoperative N/V in patients undergoing an ambulatory hand surgery under general anesthesia and determined whether patients'' satisfaction with this setting is associated with postoperative N/V levels.Methods
We prospectively evaluated 200 consecutive patients who underwent ambulatory hand surgeries under general anesthesia to assess their postoperative N/V visual analogue scale (VAS) levels during the first 24 hours after surgery and their satisfaction with an ambulatory surgery setting. Potential predictors of postoperative N/V were; age, sex, body mass index, smoking behavior, a history of postoperative N/V after previous anesthesia or motion sickness, preoperative anxiety level and the duration time of anesthesia. We conducted multivariate analyses to identify factors associated with postoperative N/V levels. We also conducted multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine whether the N/V levels are associated with the patients'' satisfaction with this setting. Here, potential predictors for satisfaction were sex, age, postoperative pain and N/V.Results
Postoperative N/V were associated with a non-smoking history, a history of motion sickness and a high level of preoperative anxiety. Twenty-two patients (11%) were dissatisfied with the ambulatory setting and this dissatisfaction was independently associated with moderate (VAS 4-7) and high (VAS 8-10) levels of postoperative N/V and with a high level (VAS 8-10) of postoperative pain.Conclusions
Although most of the patients were satisfied with the ambulatory surgery setting, moderate to high levels of N/V were associated with dissatisfaction of patients with this setting, suggesting a need for better identifying and managing those patients at risk. The information regarding risk factors for N/V could help in preoperative patient consultation regarding an ambulatory hand surgery under general anesthesia. 相似文献Methods: With approval of the authors' institutional review board, 210 patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three treatments: (1) 30% inspired oxygen in air plus intravenous administration of saline, (2) 80% inspired oxygen in air plus intravenous administration of saline, or (3) 30% inspired oxygen in air plus 75 [mu]g/kg ondansetron intravenously during induction. General anesthesia was standardized and included etomidate, alfentanil, and mivacurium for induction and sevoflurane for maintenance. PONV was evaluated 6 and 24 h postoperatively by an investigator unaware of treatment assignment.
Results: Overall postoperative incidence of nausea and vomiting was 41% for inspired oxygen fraction of 0.3 plus placebo, 38% for inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 plus placebo, and 28% for inspired oxygen fraction of 0.3 plus ondansetron, respectively (P = 0.279). Therefore, there was no statistically significant difference of PONV incidence among groups. 相似文献