Olfactory enrichment improves the recognition of individual components in mixtures

Odor mixtures can exhibit synthetic (the mixture is qualitatively different from its components) or elemental properties (the components are recognizable). We tested how prior olfactory enrichment affects the recognition of individual components in binary mixtures. Experimental rats were exposed to pairs of similar odors for one-hour periods twice daily over 20 days. Spontaneous discrimination between the binary mixture and the individual components of similar pairs of odors was tested before and after the odor enrichment. We found that, after the enrichment period, rats could discriminate components in binary mixtures that had not been discriminated prior to the enrichment period, and that this increase in discrimination capability was not always specific to the odorants used during the enrichment period.     

Odor-reward learning and enrichment have similar effects on odor perception

We compared the respective effects of odor enrichment and reward-driven discrimination learning on the perception of odors. Experimental rats were exposed to two odorants for 1-h periods once daily over 10 days, or trained with the same two odorants in a forced-choice discrimination task during a daily 20 trial session over 10 days. Spontaneous discriminations between pairs of chemically similar odors were tested before and after the odor enrichment period using an olfactory habituation/discrimination task. We found that both enrichment and discrimination learning improved the subsequent perception of other, chemically unrelated odorants in similar manners. These results show that odor experience, whether passive or active, changes perception in the manner predicted based on other groups' electrophysiological experiments.     

Familiar contextual odors promote discrimination learning in preweanling but not in older rats

For rats 16- or 28-days-old postnatal, we tested the source of the facilitation in instrumental learning provided by odors from home nest materials. Three experiments confirmed that acquisition of a spatial discrimination (to escape footshock) was facilitated not only by the presence of typical nest odors in the training context, but also by the presence of a non-rat odor (banana) to which the animals had been familiarized for 4 hr/day for 7 days. There was a borderline tendency for a similar facilitation after familiarization to the latter odor for only 10 min. These effects occurred for a similar facilition after familiarization to the latter odor for only 10 min. These effects occurred for rats 16 days postnatal but not for those 28 days old. The experiments also confirmed that the prior exposure to non-rat odors did not in itself, in the absence of that odor during learning, affect discriminated escape learning, and that enhanced affinity for a contextual odor is not a sufficent condition for enhancement of learning in its presence. There was some indication that the 16-day-old rat was more likely to select a discriminative odor to guide their choice of spatial locations if a familiar contextual odor was present.     

Olfaction and the "data" memory system in rats

A set of studies was conducted to characterize the memory system involved in successive olfactory discrimination learning in rats. Two odors emanated from different arms of a radial maze; one of the arms contained a water reward. After training on four or five pairs of odors (20 trials per day), rats learned to discriminate the members of a new pair in 5-10 trials. Experiments in which either member of the pair was compared with a novel cue indicated that the rats learn both positive and negative odors, rather than simply ignoring the negative cue. The memories for the odors were apparently persistent, and no evidence for retroactive interference from subsequent training was obtained. Training on 30 pairs did not result in any slowing of subsequent learning, which suggest that the capacity of the memory system for odors is substantial. In a second group of experiments, we tested whether rats distinguish between odors by identifying unshared subcomponents or instead treat odors in a gestalt (i.e., unitary) fashion. Animals trained on three component odors with two in common did not recognize the elements that were unshared when these were presented by themselves. Even when one of the two shared components was combined with the differentiating component into a cue (i.e., two thirds of the original three-component odor), the new cue was treated as a novel odor. However, inclusion of a previously learned simple odor in a complex odor did affect the learning of that odor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ferret odor as a processive stress model in rats: neurochemical, behavioral, and endocrine evidence

Predator odors have been shown to elicit stress responses in rats. The present studies assessed the use of domestic ferret odor as a processive stress model. Plasma corticosterone and adrenocorticotropin hormone levels were higher after 30 min of exposure to ferret odor (fur/skin) but not control odors, ferret feces, urine, or anal gland secretions. Behavioral differences were also found between ferret and the control odors as tested in a defensive withdrawal paradigm. In addition, c-fos messenger RNA expression in several brain areas previously associated with processive stress was significantly higher in ferret odor-exposed rat brains than in control odor-exposed brains. These results suggest that ferret odor produces a reliable unconditioned stress response and may be useful as a processive stress model.     

Early olfactory learning is influenced by sex in hamsters but not rats

The odor of cedar shavings repels infant and juvenile rats and hamsters reared in pine shavings when animals are tested in a two-choice situation. Housing male and female infants of either species in cedar shavings for 3 days before testing increases preference for both cedar odor and for a mixture of cedar and conspecific odors. Similar exposure of juvenile male and female rats and male hamsters, has little or no significant impact on odor preferences. However, housing female hamsters in cedar at either developmental stage equally influences odor preferences. The data imply that sex differences influence the development of early odor-guided behavior in hamsters but not rats. These species differences may have adaptive significance in that the birth of a litter produces a greater environmental change demanding a larger preference adjustment of solitary female hamsters than colonial female rats.     

Estrous odors and sexually conditioned neutral odors activate separate neural pathways in the male rat

Olfactory stimuli play important roles in sexual behavior. Previous studies have demonstrated that both estrous odors and initially neutral odors paired with copulation influence the sexual behavior of male rats. The present study examines the pattern of neural activation as revealed by Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-IR) following exposure to bedding scented with either a neutral odor (almond) paired previously with copulation, estrous odors or no odor. Following exposure to estrous odors Fos-IR increased in the accessory olfactory bulb, medial amygdala, medial bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial preoptic area, ventromedial hypothalamus, ventral tegmental area, and both the nucleus accumbens core and shell. Conversely, following exposure to the sexually conditioned odor Fos-IR increased in the piriform cortex, basolateral amygdala, nucleus accumbens core, and the anterior portion of the lateral hypothalamic area. In addition, following exposure to almond odor Fos-IR increased in the main olfactory bulb independent of its pairing with copulation. These patterns of Fos-IR following exposure to estrous or sexually conditioned odors were not influenced by either the addition or omission of the other type of odor. These findings demonstrate that estrous and sexually conditioned odors are processed by distinct neural pathways and converge in the nucleus accumbens core, suggesting that this structure has a unique role in processing sexual stimuli of both pheromonal and olfactory natures.     

Preferences of pre- and post-weanling long-evans rats for nest odors

Three experiments were conducted on the preferences of infant rats for nest odors. Pre-weanling rats preferred their own nest odor to nests of strange litters and showed low preferences for the nest odors of virgin females. Nest odors of unmated males were investigated less than the pup's own nest odor but more than the odors of virgin females. Male and female rats did not differ in odor preferences. Rats reared with both their dam and sire did not differ in their odor preferences from rats reared with their dam alone when tested at 16–20 days of age, but when tested at 33–38 days of age they showed a greater preference for male odors. Post-weanling rats did not show a preference for the nest odors of lactating females and began to show sex differences in their preferences.     

Representations of odors in the rat orbitofrontal cortex change during and after learning

Cells in the orbitofrontal cortex (OF) respond to odors and their associated rewards. To determine how these responses are acquired and maintained, the authors recorded single OF units in rats performing an odor discrimination task. Approximately 64% of all cells differentiated between rewarded and nonrewarded odors. These odor valence responses changed during learning in 26% of all cells, and these changes were positively correlated with improving performance, supporting the idea that the information provided by these cells is used in learning the task. However, changes in odor valence responses were also observed after learning, and included not only increases in odor discrimination, but also decreases or mixed increases and decreases. Thus, only some of the changes in firing reflected acquisition of the task. The results suggest that learning triggers a continuing reorganization of OF neural ensembles representing odors and their rewards.     

Rats assess degree of relatedness from human odors

Despite widespread interest in the evolutionary implications of human olfactory communication, the mechanisms underlying human odor production are still poorly understood. Previous studies have demonstrated that human odor cues are related to variations in the major histocompatibility complex, but it is unclear whether odors are associated with overall genotypic variation. In this study, we investigated whether more closely related humans produce more similar odor cues. To assess objective odor qualities we tested odor similarity using rats in a habituation–discrimination paradigm. Rats were first habituated to a referent human odor and were then presented with two test odors obtained from individuals related in different degrees to the referent. Investigation times for each odor were compared. Because rats investigate novel odors longer than familiar odors, we were able to determine which test odor the rats perceived as more similar to the referent human odor. For six of ten odor donor families, rats investigated the odor of the less closely related individual significantly longer than that of the more closely related individual, and investigation durations were in the expected direction for all families. These results indicate that similarity of human odor cues is associated with degree of genetic relatedness, with more closely related humans producing more similar odor cues. This study supports the hypothesis that odor cues provide information regarding degree of relatedness and may thus affect a wide variety of human behaviors, including kin preferences, nepotism, and mate choice.     

Rat's responses to blood and body odors of stressed and non-stressed conspecifics

Male rats were tested in a Y-maze for exploratory responses to odors from stressed and non-stressed rats, and from the blood of stressed and non-stressed rats. Significant differences in activity but not preference were obtained in rats receiving odors from stressed and non-stressed rats. Odors from rats given 5 random, signalled, 2 sec electric shocks over 15 min, significantly increased the activity of receivers, compared to responses elicited by odors from non-stressed animals (Experiment 1). Odors from rats given 12 random, signalled, 2 sec electric shocks over 35 min significantly reduced receivers' activity (Experiment 2). Interestingly, responses of rats to odors from the blood of stressed and non-stressed rats were similar to their responses to odors from stressed and non-stressed rats. It is concluded that responses to these odors depend upon the stressor applied to the odor producing rats. Rats subjected to different stress conditions may change the quality or concentration of the odors they emit and thereby alter the responses of rats receiving the odors.     

Transfer of a sex odor discrimination by rats

To test for transfer of a sex odor discrimination, 2 male rats were initially trained to discriminate between the odors of sawdust bedding from a male and female rat and then tested with stimuli from 4 other pairs of male and female rats. Both animals showed strong positive transfer to each of the pairs of test stimuli.     

Influence of the odorization of the rearing environment on the development of odor-guided behavior in rat pups

The study describes a phenomenon in which attraction of rat pups to artificial odors disappeared after the first week of life. In experiment 1, pups were continually exposed to either: (1) the normal odors present in the litter or (2) the same odors enriched with one of four artificial odors present in the dam's food. Pups were tested daily with the odors of normal or adulterated soiled shavings from their nests. The results show that attraction to the normal test shavings lasted throughout the testing period (PN 1-7). However, pups raised on odorized shavings exhibited an attraction to the artificial odor until day 6 only, not on day 7. In experiment 2, pups were tested with dam's artificially adulterated food. The results show that the artificial odor, and not the food odor, was responsible for the lack of attraction on day 7. Experiment 3 was carried out to determine whether the date on which attraction to artificial odors changed might be specific to postnatal day 7 or whether the duration of odor exposure in test conditions was the important factor. The results suggest that the age of pup is the more important variable.     

Discrimination of odors from stressed rats by non-stressed rats

Comparison of earlier reports of rat stress odors is complicated by the many differences in experimental parameters and responses measured. To evaluate whether these stress odors provide a special signal, rats were subjected to different levels of stressful foot-shock in one half of a simple two-compartment test box whilst the other half was clean and unoccupied. The results show that whilst test subjects preferred the half containing odors from non-stressed rats, this preference was decreased by the presence of stress odors to an extent concordant with the level of stressor applied to the odor donors. There were no differences in plasma corticosterone among the odor donors indicating that this hormone is probably not the source of stress odors. Plasma corticosterone levels of the subjects were similar to each other and to the odor donors. Compared to odors from non-stressed rats, stress odors increased the activity of the subjects. The evidence strongly suggests a special signalling function for stress odors although responses to this signal are not stereotyped.     

Shedding facilitates exposure learning in the garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis)

Young garter snakes were exposed to a specific chemical odor for five consecutive days. Following training, the snakes were individually tested for their preferences for the training odor vs. an unfamiliar odor. Snakes that were trained and tested prior to — or following — their initial shedding displayed no selective responsiveness towards the odors. However, nine snakes which shed for the first time during the training period spent significantly more time near the training odor as compared to the novel odor during subsequent testing. It was concluded that endocrine changes which initiate and accompany shedding may account for the preference for the familiar odor shown by the snakes which shed during training. The possible adaptive value of such exposure learning was also discussed.     

Olfactory learning and odor memory in the rat.

Rats were trained on a series of 9 tasks, each of which required discrimination among 8 different and unique odors. Discrimination accuracy improved across successive problems and, by the end of training, most rats made few errors after their initial exposure to each new odor. Despite the number of stimuli to be discriminated, this acquisition of a learning set was not appreciably different from that demonstrated in an earlier study that used only 2 odors per task. In subsequent retention tests, most rats also showed excellent memory for odors used in prior problems.     

Short-term exposure to an odor increases its subsequent preference in preweanling rats: A descriptive profile of the phenomenon

Five experiments assessed the change in preference for an ambient odor after a brief period of exposure to that odor. Three minutes of exposure to a novel odor consistently increased subsequent preference for that odor. This effect occurred in preweanling rats 10 and 15 days of age even though, relative to the nest, the conditions of exposure were probably aversive tactually and thermally. There was relatively little variation in this effect between the ages of 10 Days postnatal and adulthood and over exposure durations ranging between 3 and 81 min. Substantial retention of this exposure effect was found for the 10-day-old rat, with no decline in induced preference over a 24-hr period. The effect was unchanged by brief familiarization with the testing situation, but was eliminated by prior aversive experience with the testing situation. These results have implications for the design and interpretation of experiments that test learning and memory of odors, and emphazise generally the facility of the developing rat for processing olfactory information.     

Non-associative defensive responses of rats to ferret odor

Predators and their odors offer an ethologically valid model to study learning processes. The present series of experiments assessed the ability of ferret odor to serve as an unconditioned stimulus and examined behavioral and endocrine changes in male Sprague-Dawley rats with single or repeated exposures in a defensive withdrawal paradigm or in their home cages. Rats exposed to ferret odor avoided the ferret odor stimulus more, exhibited greater risk assessment and displayed higher adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) and corticosterone release compared with control odor exposed rats and these measures did not significantly habituate over repeated exposures. Ferret odor exposure did not show associative conditioning effects during extinction trials. However, rats that were pre-exposed to ferret odor only once, as compared to control and repeatedly exposed rats, displayed a sensitized ACTH and corticosterone response to an additional ferret odor exposure in small cages. These experiments suggest that ferret odor is a highly potent unconditioned stimulus that has long lasting effects on behavior and endocrine responses, and further suggests the independence of habituation and sensitization processes.     

Responses of male mice to odors of females: Effects of T- and H-2-locus genotype

Male wild house mice (Mus musculus) were given a choice of odors of females whose T-locus genotype was +/ + or +/t. Males showed strong preferences for the odors of +/ + females. However, when males were tested with odors of recombinant females whose genotype differed at the T locus but which carried similar haplotypes at the H-2 locus, the preference for odors of +/+ females was not manifested. Consequently, differences in female odor production that are responsible for male odor preference are not due specifically to the female genotype at the T locus.This work was partially supported by NIH Grant HD R01 1997 and a BRSG Grant from Rutgers University.