Modeling the economic benefit of targeted mild hypothermia in deceased donor kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplant significantly increases inpatient and outpatient cost. Targeted, mild hypothermia in organ donors after neurologic determination of death significantly reduced the rate of DGF in a recent randomized controlled clinical trial. To assess the potential economic benefit of national implementation of donor hypothermia, rates of reduction DGF were combined with estimates of the impact of DGF on hospital cost and total health expenditure for standard and extended criteria donor organs (SCD and ECD). DGF increases the cost of the transplant episode by $9487 for ECD transplant and $10 342 for SCD transplant. Medicare recipients with DGF incur an additional $18 513 spending for ECD and $14 948 in SCD transplants over the first year. An absolute reduction in DGF rate after kidney transplantation consistent with trial results (ECD 25%, SCD 7%) has the potential to lower annual hospital cost for kidney transplant by $13 178 746 and annual Medicare spending by $20 970 706 compared to standard donor management practice using static cold storage. Targeted mild hypothermia improves care of renal transplant patients by safely reducing DGF rates in both ECD and SCD transplant. Broader application of this safe, effective, and low‐cost intervention could reduce healthcare expenditures for providers and insurers.     

The economic benefit of allocation of kidneys based on cross-reactive group matching

BACKGROUND: Recently the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) began a pilot study to evaluate prospectively the merits of an allocation of cadaveric kidneys based on broader classes of HLA antigens, called cross-reactive groups (CREG). The objectives of the pilot study consider patient outcomes, but not the potential economic impact of a CREG-based allocation. This study predicts the impact of a CREG-based local allocation of cadaveric kidneys on 3-year Medicare payments and graft survival. METHODS: The UNOS renal transplant registry was merged to Medicare claims data for 1991-1997 by the United States Renal Data System. Average accumulated Medicare payments and graft survival up to 3 years posttransplant for first cadaveric renal transplant recipients were stratified by cross-reactive group mismatch categories. The economic impact was defined as the difference in average 3-year costs per transplant between the current and proposed allocation algorithms. Average 3-year costs were computed as a weighted average of costs, where the weights were the actual and predicted distributions of transplants across cross-reactive group categories. RESULTS: Results suggest that an organ allocation based on cross-reactive group matching criteria would result in a 3-year cost savings of $1,231 (2%) per transplant, and an average 3-year graft survival improvement of 0.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Cost savings and graft survival improvements can be expected if CREG criteria were to replace current criteria in the current allocation policy for cadaveric kidneys, although the savings appear to be smaller than may be achievable through expanded HLA matching.     

Association of Lower Costs of Pulsatile Machine Perfusion in Renal Transplantation from Expanded Criteria Donors

Pulsatile machine perfusion (PMP) has been shown to reduce delayed graft function (DGF) in expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. Here, we investigate whether there is a cost benefit associated with PMP utilization in ECD kidney transplants. We analyzed United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data describing Medicare‐insured ECD kidney transplant recipients in 1995–2004 (N = 5840). We examined total Medicare payments for transplant hospitalization and annually for 3 years posttransplant according to PMP utilization. After adjusting for other recipient, donor and transplant factors, PMP utilization was associated with a $2130 reduction (p = 0.007) in hospitalization costs. PMP utilization was also associated with lower DGF risk (p < 0.0001). PMP utilization did not predict differences in rejection, graft survival, patient survival, or costs at 1, 2 and 3 years posttransplant. PMP utilization is correlated with lower costs for the transplant hospitalization, which is likely due to the associated reduction in DGF among recipients of PMP kidneys. However, there is no difference in long‐term Medicare costs for ECD recipients by PMP utilization. A prospective trial is necessary as it will help determine if the associations seen here are due to PMP utilization and not differences in the population studied.     

Clinical and Histopathologic Comparative Analysis Between Kidney Transplant Recipients From Expanded-Criteria Donors and Standard-Criteria Donors

Owing to the disparity between the supply of kidney donors and demand, the use of organs from older deceased donors was initiated in recent years. The potentially poor outcome of these grafts is a major concern. This retrospective study compares graft and patient 1-year survivals between recipients from expanded-criteria donors (ECD; n = 30) and standard-criteria donors (SCD; n = 104). Rates of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and chronic injury in the pre-implantation biopsy were also assessed. Increasing donor age was associated with increased rates of DGF, and DGF correlated with AR. Cold ischemia time >30 hours was associated with worse graft outcomes. Induction with Simulect correlated with better patient survival compared with Timoglobulina. Chronic injury pre-implantation biopsy correlated with worse renal function, but graft survival was similar. Death-censored graft survival at 1 year was 90% and patient survival 82%, and these were similar in ECD and SCD recipients. Selection of transplant candidates for ECD kidneys must be performed with caution. One-year graft survival was similar to that of SCD kidneys, but kidney function was worse during the same period. This may result in poorer graft survival over longer follow-up.     

Expanded criteria donors: process and outcomes

Expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are transplantable deceased donor (DD) kidneys for which the average patient, graft survival, and renal function are inferior when compared to standard criteria DD kidneys. Although the term ECD kidneys has been used since the early 1990s to describe kidneys with various characteristics associated with poorer outcomes, the concept has been formally implemented in U.S. organ allocation. A DD kidney is considered to be an ECD organ if the estimated adjusted risk of graft failure is > or = 70% (RR > or = 1.70) compared to DD kidneys with standard characteristics of transplant suitability. The donor characteristics that define an ECD kidney include age > or = 60 years, or age 50-59 years plus two of the following: cerebrovascular accident as the cause of death, preexisting hypertension, or terminal serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dl. In the aggregate, recipients of ECD kidneys have improved survival compared to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on the kidney transplant waiting list. Patient survival is 5% lower at 1 year and 8-12% lower at 3-5 years for ECD kidney recipients. Adjusted graft survival in ECD kidneys is 8% lower at 1 year and 15-20% lower at 3-5 years after transplantation compared to standard criteria donor kidneys. However, patients less than 40 years of age, African Americans, Asians for whom the median waiting time is less than 1350 days receive no survival benefit from ECD kidney transplantation. Informed choice by the potential recipient is a prominent feature of the allocation policy regarding ECD kidneys. Since there are recipient characteristics associated with no survival benefit following ECD transplantation, nephrologists who refer patients for kidney transplantation should be familiar with the combination of donor and recipient factors that are likely to yield detrimental results.     

Pulsatile Perfusion Reduces the Incidence of Delayed Graft Function in Expanded Criteria Donor Kidney Transplantation

The use of expanded criteria donors (ECD) has been proposed to help combat the discrepancy between organ availability and need. ECD kidneys are associated with delayed graft function (DGF) and worse long-term survival. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of pulsatile perfusion (PP) on DGF and graft survival in transplanted ECD kidneys. From January 2000 to December 2003, 4618 ECD kidney-alone transplants were reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing. PP was performed on 912 renal allografts. The prognostic factors of DGF were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Risk factors for reduced allograft viability were greater in donors and recipients of PP kidneys. Three-year graft survival of ECD kidneys preserved with PP was similar to cold storage (CS) kidneys. The incidence of DGF in PP kidneys was significantly lower than CS kidneys (26% vs. 36%, p < 0.001). Despite having a greater number of risk factors for reduced graft viability, the ECD-PP kidneys had similar graft survival compared to ECD-CS kidneys. The use of PP, by decreasing the incidence of DGF, may possibly lead to lower overall costs and increased utilization of donor kidneys.     

Delayed Graft Function Has an Equally Bad Impact on Deceased Donor Renal Graft Survival in Both Standard Criteria Donors and Expanded Criteria Donors

Introduction

The use of expanded criteria donors (ECDs) is still limited because of inferior graft survival compared to standard criteria donors (SCDs). We assessed the impact of immediate graft function (IGF) on renal graft survival among recipients of SCD and ECD grafts to determine whether these kidneys performed equally well under “ideal” conditions favoring IGF.

Methods

We included all cadaveric renal transplants performed from 1990 to 2002 (n = 335). Delayed graft function (DGF) was defined as the need for dialysis in the first 7 days posttransplant. Slow graft function (SGF) and IGF were defined as a serum creatinine fall by <20% versus >20% in the first 24 hours posttransplant, respectively. Non-death censored actual graft survivals are reported herein.

Results

Seventy-two of the 335 subjects (21.5%) received organs from ECDs and displayed IGF in 54.7%, SGF 16.2%, and DGF 29.1%. Among SCDs, the SGF and DGF rates were 15.3% and 23.4%, respectively. In ECD, the SGF and DGF rates were 19.4% and 50% (P < .02). Actual graft survivals at 1 and 5 years was 86.3% and 70.4%, respectively. Patients with IGF had higher actual graft survival at 5 years compared to SGF and DGF (83.5% vs 74.1% vs 45.4%). DGF had an equally bad impact on actual 5-year graft survival in SCDs and ECDs (42.6% vs 50%).

Conclusion

DGF has a strong detrimental impact on 5-year graft survival. There is a higher rate of DGF in ECD versus SCD kidneys. The detrimental impact on 5-year actual graft survival is equal in SCD and ECD kidneys. Minimizing DGF should be our goal.     

Hypertension is an independent predictor of delayed graft function and worse renal function only in kidneys with chronic pathological lesions

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) has been identified as one of the principal correlates of poor graft survival in cadaveric renal transplantation. However, its risk factors and clinical predictors have been poorly elucidated. METHODS: We analyzed the risk factors of DGF with a specific emphasis on the role of histological damage of donor kidney. Then, we also studied the impact of DGF, and donor factors affecting DGF, on kidney graft function over the first year after engraftment in 100 consecutive cadaveric renal transplant (Tx) recipients. RESULTS: The organs displaying DGF (n=48) had a significantly higher degree of glomerular sclerosis and tubular atrophy (P<0.01), as well as of interstitial fibrosis and vascular damage (P<0.02) in time-zero biopsies. In patients who received an "ideal" organ for Tx (total histological score < or = 4), DGF showed a strong relationship with Deltaage D-R (70% increase of risk for donors 10 years older than recipients), and with the histological score (odds ratio 1.34). In contrast, donor hypertension was the most relevant variable independently associated with DGF (odds ratio 19.4) in patients receiving a suboptimal organ (histological score >4). Moreover, DGF and donor hypertension adversely affected graft function at 1 year, but only in Tx patients with a histological score >4 in time-zero biopsy. Of note, both patients with and those without DGF showed a very low incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (8.5 and 6.8%, respectively) and a rather short cold ischemia time (<16 hr). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the quality of the transplanted organ and the occurrence of DGF are strictly related to each other and can influence graft function through apparently nonimmune mechanisms. In addition, long-standing donor hypertension is a strong independent variable affecting both DGF and graft function of suboptimal cadaveric kidneys, at least up to 1 year.     

Renal Transplantation With Expanded Criteria Donors: The Experience of One Portuguese Center

Background

The shortage of kidneys available for transplantation has led to enlarged criteria donors (ECD): namely, donors older than 60 years or aged between 50 and 59 years with 2 of the following characteristics-hypertension, predonation serum creatinine level higher than 1.5 mg/dL or cerebrovascular disease as the cause of death. The aim of this study was to analyze renal transplants using ECD compared with standard criteria donors (SCD) concerning the incidences of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection episodes (ARE), and patient and graft survivals.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study of 409 cadaveric renal transplants over the last 4 years identified ECD in contrast with SCD.

Results

Of the transplants, 24.4% used ECD. The baseline characteristics of recipients of ECD versus SCD kidneys were similar, except for age and cold ischemia time. Comparing ECD and SCD, we observed an higher incidence of DGF (35% vs 18%), occurrence of ARE (34.4% vs 16.6%), average serum creatinine levels at 6 (1.87 vs 1.4 mg/dL), and 12 months (1.88 vs 1.43 mg/dL) as well as lower graft survival at 1 (82% vs 91%) and 3 years (75% vs 84%) after transplantation. Recipient survival at 1 year was not different. Multivariate analysis identified recipient age, cold ischemia time, ARE, and DGF as risk factors for graft failure.

Conclusions

Renal transplantation with grafts from ECD shows significantly worse outcomes with higher rates of DGF and ARE, worse graft function, and lower graft survival.     

Clinical analysis on 48 cases of kidney transplantation from brain and cardiac death donors

Objective To observe the short-term clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from brain and cardiac death donors (DBCD) and assess its feasibility to expand organ donor pool. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 48 cases of kidney transplantation from DBCD.The transplant recipients had finished 12-month follow-up in the First People's Hospital of Foshan from September 2011 to February 2015, with their renal function, rejection reaction and complications at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after renal transplantation being collected. Survival rates of transplant recipients and transplant kidneys, incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and its influence for recipients and graft survival were analyzed by statistics. Results In the 48 cases, the survival rates of recipients at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after transplantation were 100.0%, 100.0%, 97.9%, 95.8%, and the survival rates of transplanted kidneys were 95.8%, 95.8%, 93.8%, 91.7%, respectively. DGF occurred in 8 of 48 (17.0%), but the occurrence of DGF did not adversely influence patient's survival (P=0.524) or graft survival (P=0.362). Conclusions The short-term clinical outcomes of kidney transplantation from DBCD are ideal. As the legislation of donation after brain death (DBD) has not been ratified in China, the kidney transplantation from DBCD could be an important way to solve the shortage of organs, and increase the number of kidneys available for transplantation.     

Does delayed kidney graft function increase the risk of chronic rejection?

Abstract  The impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on later renal graft loss due to chronic rejection was studied in a single center using uniform protocol for organ procure merit and post transplant patient care. DGF function was observed in 34 % of 829 consecutive first cadaveric renal transplants in adults and in 47 % of 169 retransplantations (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in graft survival between groups with early graft function (EGF) and DGF, either in first transplantations or retransplantations. The half-life in EGF and DGF groups of first transplants was 12.3 years and 10.5 years, respectively, and of retransplantants was 8.0 years and 6.5 years, respectively. DGF was divided in three subgroups according to the day of onset. If graft function started during the first or second week after transplantation there were no significant differences in long-term graft survival rates compared with EGF. Only in re-transplants, if graft function started later than 2 weeks postoperatively, were long-term graft survival rates significantly lower when compared with EGF and the difference persisted if other causes of graft loss except chronic rejection were censored.     

Outcome of transplantation using kidneys from controlled (Maastricht category 3) non-heart-beating donors

BACKGROUND: Many renal transplant centres are reluctant to use kidneys from non-heart-beating (NHB) donors because of the high incidence of primary non-function and delayed graft function reported in the literature. Here, we report our favourable experience of using kidneys from Maastricht category 3 donors (controlled NHB donors). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1996 to June 2002, 42 renal transplants using kidneys from 25 controlled NHB donors were undertaken at our centre. The rates of primary non-function, delayed graft function (DGF), rejection and long-term graft and patient survival were compared with those of 84 recipients of grafts from heart-beating (HB donors) transplanted contemporaneously. RESULTS: Primary non-function did not occur in recipients of grafts from NHB donors but was seen in two grafts from HB donors. DGF occurred in 21 of 42 (50%) kidneys from NHB donors and 14 of 84 (17%) kidneys from HBD donars (p < 0.001). The acute rejection rates in the two groups were similar (33% for grafts from NHB donors vs. 40% from HB donors). By 1 month after transplantation, there was no significant difference in serum creatinine concentration between the two groups. Over a median follow-up period of 32 months (range 2-75 months), the actuarial graft survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 yr after transplantation were 84, 80 and 74% for recipients of kidneys from NHB donors, compared with 89, 85 and 80% for kidneys from HB donors. CONCLUSION: Controlled NHB donors are a valuable and under-used source of kidneys for renal transplantation. The outcome for recipients of kidney allografts from category 3 NHB donors is similar to that seen in recipients of grafts from conventional HB cadaveric donors.     

Inferior Early Posttransplant Outcomes for Recipients of Right Versus Left Deceased Donor Kidneys: An ANZDATA Registry Analysis

Anatomical differences between right and left kidneys could influence transplant outcome. We compared graft function and survival for left and right kidney recipients transplanted from the same deceased organ donor. Adult recipients of 4900 single kidneys procured from 2450 heart beating deceased donors in Australia and New Zealand from 1995 to 2009 were included in a paired analysis. Right kidneys were associated with more delayed graft function (DGF) (25 vs. 21% for left kidneys, p < 0.001) and, if not affected by DGF, a slower fall in serum creatinine. One‐year graft survival was lower for right kidneys (89.1 vs. 91.1% for left kidneys, p = 0.001), primarily attributed to surgical complications (66 versus 35 failures for left kidneys). Beyond the first posttransplant year, kidney side was not associated with eGFR, graft or patient survival. Receipt of a right kidney is a risk factor for inferior outcomes in the first year after transplantation. A higher incidence of surgical complications suggests the shorter right renal vein may be contributory. The higher susceptibility of right kidneys to injury should be considered in organ allocation.     

The Effects of Donor and Recipient Practices on Transplant Center Finances

Over the past several years we have noted a marked decrease in this profitability of our kidney transplant program. Our hypothesis is that this reduction in kidney transplant institutional profitability is related to aggressive donor and recipient practices. The study population included all adults with Medicare insurance who received a kidney transplant at our center between 1999 and 2005. Adopting the hospital perspective, multi-variate linear regression models to determine the independent effects of donor and recipient characteristics and era effects on total reimbursements and total hospital margin. We note statistically significant decreased medical center incremental margins in cases with ECDs (−$5887) and in cases of DGF (−4937). We also note an annual change in the medical center margin is independently associated with year and changes at a rate of −$5278 per year, related to both increasing costs and decreasing Medicare reimbursements. The financial loss associated with patient DGF and the use of ECD kidneys may resonate with other centers, and could hinder efforts to expand kidney transplantation within the United States. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should consider risk-adjusted reimbursement for kidney transplantation.     

Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation

BACKGROUND: Early immunologic and non-immunologic injury of renal allografts adversely affects long-term graft survival. Some degree of preservation injury is inevitable in cadaveric renal transplantation, and, with the reduction in early acute rejection, this non-immunologic injury has assumed a greater relative importance. Optimal graft preservation will maximize the chances of early graft function and long-term graft survival, but the best method of preservation pulsatile perfusion (PP) versus cold storage (CS) is debated. METHODS: Primary cadaveric kidney recipients from January 1990 through December 1995 were evaluated. The effects of implantation warm ischemic time (WIT) ( < or = 20 min, 21-40 min, or > 40 min) and total ischemic time (TIT) ( < or > or = 20 h) on death-censored graft survival were compared between kidneys preserved by PP versus those preserved by CS. The effect of preservation method on delayed graft function (DGF) was also examined. RESULTS: There were 568 PP kidneys and 268 CS kidneys. Overall death-censored graft survival was not significantly different between groups, despite worse donor and recipient characteristics in the PP group. CS kidneys with an implantation WIT > 40 min had worse graft survival than those with < 40 min (p = 0.0004). Survival of PP kidneys and those transplanted into 2 DR-matched recipients was not affected by longer implantation WIT. Longer TIT did not impact survival. DGF was more likely after CS preservation (20.2% versus 8.8%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preservation with PP improves early graft function and lessens the adverse effect of increased warm ischemia in cadaveric renal transplantation. This method is likely associated with less preservation injury and/or increases the threshold for injury from other sources and is superior to CS.     

Outcome of Transplantation in Renal Allograft Recipients From Cadaveric Donors With Standard and Expanded Criteria: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionThe increasing number of patients requiring kidney transplantation and the lack of available organs has led to the utilization of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD).AimThe comparison of the clinical outcome of renal transplantation, performed in a single center, between allograft recipients from standard (SCD) and expanded criteria donors (ECD).Patients and MethodsData from 215 cadaveric renal transplantations performed during a 16 year period at the University Hospital of Patras were retrospectively studied. Donors' and recipients' characteristics (gender, age, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, cold ischemia time, post-transplant and long term graft function) were analyzed.ResultsGrafts from donors with expanded criteria (ECD, n = 53) were allocated to older recipients whereas grafts from donors with standard criteria (SCD, n = 162) were allocated to younger recipients. The mean cold ischemia time was 1,146 min and was similar between the two groups of patients. Patients' survival rates were similar between allograft recipients from SCD and ECD up to the 5^th post-transplant year of follow-up. Graft survival was significantly better in allograft recipients from SCD during a 5-year follow-up period. A significantly lower eGFR was noted in allograft recipients from ECD in comparison to those from SCD throughout the observation period. Cold ischemia time was positively correlated to the development of DGF, while patients with DGF had significantly worse graft function throughout the observation period.ConclusionPatient survival from ECD is comparable to that from SCD but graft survival is significantly lower. However, since renal function of recipients from ECD is adequate for long term period, grafts from ECD should be used in older patients.     

Comparison of outcomes after delayed graft function: sirolimus-based versus other calcineurin-inhibitor sparing induction immunosuppression regimens

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (SRL) may increase the incidence of or prolong delayed graft function (DGF) after cadaveric renal transplantation. This study compares transplant outcomes of SRL-based induction immunosuppression (IS) with other calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) sparing regimens in the DGF setting. METHODS: Adult cadaveric renal-transplant recipients who received transplants between January 1, 1997 and June 30, 2001 and experienced DGF (n=132) were divided into three groups by induction IS: A, depleting antibody (n=41); B, SRL (n=49); and C, neither (n=42). All recipients also received steroids and mycophenolate mofetil with delayed initiation of CNIs when good renal function returned. Patient survival, graft survival, and time to rejection within 1 year of transplantation were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. One-year graft function was compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The SRL group had longer DGF duration (P=0.01). The three groups had comparable patient (P=0.27) and graft survival (P=0.69), but the depleting antibody group experienced less rejection (P=0.004). There were no clinically significant differences in 1-year graft function. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis of a large and modern cohort of adult cadaveric transplant recipients with DGF, induction immunosuppression with a depleting antibody preparation reduced rejection, whereas SRL prolonged DGF duration. All three CNI-sparing induction IS regimens resulted in comparable patient survival, graft survival, and graft function.     

Comparison of histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution in prolonged cold preservation of kidney allografts

Although University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is the standard preservation solution for organ transplantation, Histidine-Tryptophan Ketogluatarate (HTK) solution has been increasingly used. This study compared HTK or UW for cold static storage of kidney allografts. In all, 149 renal transplants were performed with cold ischemic times (CI) greater than 16 hr (UW 87, HTK 62) and a subset analysis was performed with CI over 24 hr (HTK 31, UW 38). Data from receiving renal transplant centers focused on delayed graft function (DGF), patient and allograft survival. In CI greater than 16 hr, graft and patient survival were comparable. HTK cohort had lower DGF. In CI greater than 24 hr, there was no difference in patient survival, a trend towards improved graft survival in HTK, and decreased rate of DGF in HTK. This data suggests that UW and HTK have at least similar efficacy in kidney preservation at longer ischemic times.     

Expanded-criteria donor kidneys: a single-center clinical and short-term financial analysis--cause for concern in retransplantation

BACKGROUND: Expanded-criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are associated with a higher risk of posttransplant failure, but they remain a favorable alternative to dialysis. Now that a uniform definition of "expanded criteria" exists, it is more appropriate than ever to evaluate their utility compared with that seen with non-ECD kidneys. METHODS: The authors analyzed 202 cadaveric kidney-only recipients that underwent transplantation from January 1999 to September 2001, including 45 (22%) recipients whose donors met current ECD criteria. RESULTS: ECD and non-ECD kidney recipients had similar pretransplant characteristics except for older age and increased duration of renal failure in the ECD group. Patient, graft, and death-censored graft survival in both groups were similar in primary recipients but significantly worse in retransplant recipients of ECD kidneys. The relative risk of death-censored graft loss was 1.58 in the ECD group (P = 0.45). Overall inpatient charges (minus organ acquisition charge) for 1 year posttransplant were 76,962 US dollars (ECD) versus 71,026 US dollars (non-ECD) (P = 0.53); the same charges in retransplant recipients were 136,596 US dollars (ECD) versus 91,296 US dollars (non-ECD) (P = 0.25). ECD recipients, especially retransplant recipients, had consistently higher creatinine concentrations, although the average current value of all functioning ECD grafts remains less than 2 mg/dL. ECD recipients had a higher incidence of ureteral stricture (4.4% vs. 0%), but this never resulted in graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the widening disparity between renal allograft availability and need and the fact that ECD kidneys provide superior outcomes compared with dialysis, the authors' data encourage the continued use of ECD kidneys in primary recipients but justify caution in the retransplant setting.     

Calcium ion concentration of machine perfusate predicts early graft function in expanded criteria donor kidneys

Pulsatile preservation offers the advantage of pretransplant assessment of donor kidneys. Selected electrolyte concentrations of machine perfusate were measured over time in order to: (1) describe electrolyte changes in perfusate during the pulsatile preservation of expanded-criteria donor (ECD) kidneys, and (2) to assess the prognostic significance of these characteristics to early graft function. One hundred and fifty ECD kidneys were preserved in our laboratory between 1 January 1995 and 11 January 1997. ECD kidneys were defined as those requiring pretransplant biopsy. Kidneys were grouped by the presence or absence of delayed graft function (DGF), and perfusion parameters were measured every hour during pulsatile perfusion. All kidneys were preserved by continuous hypothermic pulsatile perfusion using Belzer II solution. Renal flow is decreased and renal resistance is increased in the presence of DGF in machine-preserved ECD kidneys. In addition, ionized calcium concentration of the machine perfusate is significantly elevated in the DGF group compared with the No DGF group (0.091 vs 0.054, P = 0.0016). The incidence of DGF is significantly lower in the ECD kidney. Among the pretransplant variables of donor characteristics, perfusion parameters and histology, perfusion parameters are highly predictive of early graft function. In addition, we found that ionized calcium concentration in the perfusate is significantly elevated in kidneys exhibiting DGF, which may have implications for assessing the suitability of donor kidneys for transplantation. Received: 10 August 1998 Received after revision: 9 March 1999 Accepted: 25 June 1999