Phase II feasibility study of sequential couplets of Cisplatin/Topotecan followed by paclitaxel/cisplatin as primary treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study.

PURPOSE: Despite the improved results in advanced ovarian cancer achieved with the addition of paclitaxel to frontline therapy, there remains room for improvement. One approach is to add new agents such as topotecan. Because myelosuppression limits the delivery of topotecan with paclitaxel/cisplatin in a three-drug combination, we explored giving sequential couplets of cisplatin/topotecan followed by paclitaxel/cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma after primary surgery were studied. Cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 and topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 5 were administered at 21-day intervals for four cycles, followed by interval debulking surgery (if optimal debulking was not achieved with primary surgery), and then paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) over 24 hours on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 2 at 21-day intervals for four cycles. RESULTS: Such sequential couplets are feasible. Myelotoxicity was the major toxic effect, but it was of short duration. The granulocyte nadir with topotecan/cisplatin occurred late (median, day 18), so retreatment on day 21 was not always possible. There was no unexpected nonhematologic toxicity. The regimen was active in this group of patients who had undergone largely suboptimal debulking surgery. In 34 patients with clinically measurable disease, the overall response rate was 78%, and 30 (77%) of the 39 patients with elevated CA 125 levels at baseline had normalization of CA 125 levels by the end of therapy. CONCLUSION: Sequential couplets of cisplatin/topotecan followed by paclitaxel/cisplatin are feasible. The efficacy data in this suboptimal group of patients has encouraged us to proceed with a randomized study based on this approach.     

Weekly administration of topotecan–paclitaxel as second-line treatment in ovarian cancer

Purpose To investigate the weekly administration of topotecan combined with paclitaxel in pretreated advanced ovarian cancer patients; our objectives were to determine efficacy, toxicity and survival Methods The chemotherapy agents, topotecan and paclitaxel were administered on a weekly basis for 3 consecutive weeks, every 28 days. The plan was to give three courses (each course included three once-weekly infusions). The dose of topotecan was 1.75 mg/m² and of paclitaxel 70 mg/m². Results From January 2004 until January 2006, 45 patients were enrolled in this multicenter trial; 44 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The median age was 60 years old (range 39–82 years) and performance status was 0–2. Thirty-nine patients were in stage III and 5 in stage IV. All patients had been pretreated with carboplatin or cisplatin in combination with paclitaxel. Complete and partial responses were seen in 39% of the patients, stable disease in 43% and progressive disease in 18%; median survival time was 9 months, range 2–24+ months, (95% CI: 7.9–10.2). There was a notable absence of grade 3 toxicity except for neutropenia in 11% of the patients. Conclusion The combination of topotecan and paclitaxel administered on a weekly basis is a well-tolerated chemotherapy schedule. The response rate of 39% is quite high for patients with pretreated ovarian cancer.     

甘氨双唑钠(CMNa)联合紫杉醇卡铂化疗对中晚期卵巢癌术后CA125升高的影响

Objective:To investigate the effects of CMNa combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin on elevated CA125 levels in post-operation advanced ovarian cancer patients.Methods:The effects of CMNa combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin on elevated CA125 levels in 25 post-operation advanced ovarian cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared with those in 20 control cases.Results:After 1 cycle of chemotherapy,CA125 levels had decreasing trend compared with control,but had no statistical significance.While after two cycles of chemotherapy,CA125 levels decreased more rapidly compared with those in control.Side effects in two groups were alike.Conclusion:CMNa combined with paclitaxel and carboplatine has a stronger effect on the decrease of elevated CA125 levels than paclitaxel and carboplatin have in the treatment of post-operation advanced ovarian cancer,which indicates that CMNa has chemo-sensitizing effects on chemotherapy of paclitaxel and carboplatin.     

Clinical evidence for topotecan-paclitaxel non--cross-resistance in ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: A large, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of topotecan versus paclitaxel in patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer showed that these two compounds have similar activity. In this study, a number of patients crossed over to the alternative drug as third-line therapy, ie, from paclitaxel to topotecan and vice versa. We therefore were able to assess the degree of non-cross-resistance between these two compounds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had progressed after one platinum-based regimen were randomized to either topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/d) x 5 every 21 days (n = 112) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) over 3 hours) every 21 days (n = 114). A total of 110 patients received cross-over therapy with the alternative drug (61 topotecan, 49 paclitaxel) as third-line therapy. RESULTS: Response rates to third-line cross-over therapy were 13.1% (8 of 61 topotecan) and 10.2% (5 of 49 paclitaxel; P =.638). Seven patients who responded to third-line topotecan and four patients who responded to paclitaxel had failed to respond to their second-line treatment. Median time to progression (from the start of third-line therapy) was 9 weeks in both groups, and median survival was 40 and 48 weeks for patients who were receiving topotecan or paclitaxel, respectively. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression; grade 4 neutropenia was more frequent with topotecan (81.4% of patients) than with paclitaxel (22.9% of patients). CONCLUSION: Topotecan and paclitaxel have similar activity as second-line therapies with regard to response rates and progression-free and overall survival. We demonstrated that the two drugs have a degree of non-cross-resistance. Thus, there is a good rationale for incorporating these drugs into future first-line regimens.     

Dose-dense cisplatin/paclitaxel. a well-tolerated and highly effective chemotherapeutic regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

A randomised phase I/II trial with weekly cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43) in combination with escalating doses of paclitaxel either 4-weekly or weekly was conducted in 49 patients with ovarian cancer; patients were chemotherapy-nai;ve or had a first relapse after platinum-based chemotherapy. Paclitaxel could be safely escalated to 225 mg/m(2) 4-weekly or 100 mg/m(2) weekly, with fatigue as the major adverse event. Myelosuppression, renal toxicity and neurotoxicity were mild to moderate. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed an approximately 2-fold reduction of DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes compared with cisplatin without paclitaxel. No pharmacokinetic interaction was found between paclitaxel and cisplatin. After (re-)induction, additional chemotherapy consisted of conventional paclitaxel/cisplatin, paclitaxel/carboplatin, paclitaxel single agent or carboplatin/cyclophosphamide. The overall response rate was 94% in 17 evaluable chemotherapy-nai;ve patients and 84% in 25 patients with recurrent disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months (chemotherapy-nai;ve: 23 months, recurrent: 11 months) and median overall survival was 41 months (chemotherapy-nai;ve: 48 months, recurrent: 24 months). In conclusion, both cisplatin/paclitaxel regimens showed excellent activity with manageable toxicity in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.     

Phase I trial of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell support as front-line therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and feasibility of delivering multiple cycles of front-line high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan with peripheral-blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have a malignant solid tumor for which they had received no prior chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBSC was achieved with either filgrastim alone or in combination with cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. Patients then received three or four cycles of high-dose carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] 16), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), and topotecan (10-15 mg/m(2)), with the latter two agents administered as 24-hour infusions and supported with PBSC and filgrastim. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled onto the trial and were assessable for toxicity and clinical outcome. Dose-limiting toxicities were stomatitis and prolonged hematopoietic recovery. The maximum-tolerated dose of topotecan was 12.5 mg/m(2) when given with high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel for three cycles. Four cycles were able to be given with a dose of topotecan of 10 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetics of each compound were not affected by the other agents. Eleven (85%) of 13 patients with assessable disease responded. CONCLUSION: Multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan can be safely administered with filgrastim and PBSC support. The recommended doses for phase II study are carboplatin AUC 16, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and topotecan 10 mg/m(2). Trials are currently being conducted with this regimen as front-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and extensive small-cell carcinoma. This approach remains experimental and should be used only in the context of a clinical trial.     

Sequential dose-dense paclitaxel followed by topotecan in untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a Spanish Lung Cancer Group phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Poor survival rates in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients prompted us to evaluate a sequential dose-dense schedule of paclitaxel followed by topotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with previously untreated, extensive-stage SCLC received three cycles of paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2) over 3 h every 14 days followed by three cycles of topotecan 2.5 mg/m(2) for 5 days every 21 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given after every cycle. Patients progressing at any time and those not achieving complete response (CR) subsequently received four cycles of standard-dose etoposide-cisplatin. RESULTS: A total of 118 cycles of paclitaxel were administered with minimal hematological toxicity. Grade 2/3 peripheral neuropathy was observed in 21% of patients. Response rate to paclitaxel was 48.8%, and 25.6% had stable disease (SD). Thirty-two patients achieving SD or response to paclitaxel subsequently received a total of 90 topotecan cycles. Topotecan-related toxicities included febrile neutropenia in 15.6% of patients with one toxic death, grade 3/4 anemia in 25% of patients and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 31.3%. Non-hematological toxicities were mild. At completion of sequential paclitaxel-topotecan treatment the overall response rate was 55.8% (22 partial response, two CRs). Median survival for all patients was 10.5 months and median progression-free survival was 8.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment with dose-dense paclitaxel followed by topotecan is feasible despite significant hematological toxicity during topotecan treatment. This schedule is an active regimen in extensive-stage SCLC and merits further investigation.     

Phase 2 study of intraperitoneal topotecan as consolidation chemotherapy in ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Intravenous topotecan is approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC). In intraperitoneal (i.p.) topotecan studies, 20 mg/m(2) dosing was tolerable. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of i.p. topotecan as consolidation chemotherapy in patients with OC or primary peritoneal cancers (PPCs). METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV ovarian or PPC in clinical complete response after surgical cytoreduction and intravenous carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy who had benign findings or minimal persistent disease (< or = 1 cm diameter) at second-look surgery were eligible. Intraperitoneal topotecan 20 mg/m(2) was infused once every 21 days for 4 to 6 cycles. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled (18 [90%] patients had OC). Sixteen patients received 4 cycles, 3 patients received 6 cycles, and 1 patient withdrew after 1 cycle. The mean delivered dose was 18 mg/m(2). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (45% for both). Grade 1/2 abdominal distension and nausea were reported in 60% and 40% of patients, respectively. Median PFS was 24 months from second-look surgery (95% confidence intervals [CI]: +/-10 months). Sixteen patients were alive and median OS was not reached at the time of data analysis. OS estimated at either 30 months from second-look surgery, or 3 years from initial diagnosis, was 84% (95% CI, 68%-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Consolidation i.p. topotecan is a feasible option for women withadvanced ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers. Further investigation of i.p. topotecan is warranted in this patient population.     

Phase II trial of combretastatin A4 phosphate,carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

BackgroundA previous dose-escalation trial of the vascular disrupting agent combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P) given before carboplatin, paclitaxel, or both showed responses in 7 of 18 patients with relapsed ovarian cancer.Patients and methodsPatients with ovarian cancer that had relapsed and who could start trial therapy within 6 months of their last platinum chemotherapy were given CA4P 63 mg/m² minimum 18 h before paclitaxel 175 mg/m² and carboplatin AUC (area under the concentration curve) 5, repeated every 3 weeks.ResultsFive of the first 18 patients’ disease responded, so the study was extended and closed after 44 patients were recruited. Grade ≥2 toxic effects were neutropenia in 75% and thrombocytopenia in 9% of patients (weekly blood counts), tumour pain, fatigue, and neuropathy, with one patient with rapidly reversible ataxia. Hypertension (23% of patients) was controlled by glyceryl trinitrate or prophylactic amlodipine. The response rate by RECIST was 13.5% and by Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup CA 125 criteria 34%.ConclusionsThe addition of CA4P to paclitaxel and carboplatin is well tolerated and appears to produce a higher response rate in this patient population than if the chemotherapy was given without CA4P. A planned randomised trial will test this hypothesis.     

Do CA125 response criteria overestimate tumour response in second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma?

Recent studies indicate that cancer antigen 125 (CA125) response criteria tend to overestimate a tumour reduction measured by standard WHO response criteria in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The aim of the study was to validate the recently introduced GCIG (The Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup) CA125 response criteria in predicting a tumour response measured by WHO (World Health Organization) criteria. Changes in CA125 levels (GCIG criteria) were retrospectively compared with alterations in the tumour load (WHO criteria) during second-line chemotherapy with topotecan or paclitaxel-platinum in 124 consecutive patients with recurrent or refractory disease. In patients assessable by both response criteria (n=72), the overall response rate using GCIG CA125 criteria was 57% (95% confidence interval (CI): 45-69%) and significantly higher than the response rate of 39% (95% CI: 28-51%) using WHO response criteria (P=0.045). The GCIG CA125 criteria had a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI: 82-100%), a specificity of 68% (95% CI: 52-81%) and an accuracy of 79% (95% CI: 68-88%) in predicting a response measured by WHO criteria. In conclusion, the GCIG CA125 response criteria seem to overestimate a tumour response by WHO criteria when monitoring the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy with topotecan or paclitaxel-platinum in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma.     

Should CA-125 response criteria be preferred to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) for prognostication during second-line chemotherapy of ovarian carcinoma?

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare the prognostic value of a response by the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Cancer Antigen (CA) -125 response criteria and the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) on survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma receiving second-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a single-institution registry of 527 consecutive patients with primary ovarian carcinoma, 131 records satisfied the inclusion criteria: ovarian carcinoma of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC to IV, first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and a platinum compound, refractory or recurrent disease, and second-line chemotherapy consisting of topotecan or paclitaxel plus carboplatin. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival were performed using the landmark method. RESULTS: In patients with measurable disease by RECIST and with assessable disease by the CA-125 criteria (n = 68), the CA-125 criteria were 2.6 times better than the RECIST at disclosing survival. In a multivariate Cox analysis with inclusion of nine potential prognostic parameters, CA-125 response (responders v nonresponders; hazard ratio, 0.21; P < .001) and number of relapse sites (solitary v multiple; hazard ratio, 0.47; P = .020) were identified as contributory prognostic factors for survival, whereas the parameters of RECIST (responders v nonresponders), as well as the remaining variables, had nonsignificant prognostic impact. CONCLUSION: The GCIG CA-125 response criteria are a better prognostic tool than RECIST in second-line treatment with topotecan or paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with ovarian carcinoma.     

Early changes in CA125 after treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan do not always reflect best response in recurrent ovarian cancer patients

PURPOSE: To examine early changes in CA125 relative to objective response in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan and to compare the CA125 trends between the two chemotherapeutics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, all of whom had measurable or evaluable disease, were randomized to receive 50 mg/m2 PLD every 28 days (n = 239) or 1.5 mg/m2 topotecan for 5 days every 21 days (n = 235) as part of a previously reported multicenter study. CA125 measurements were obtained prior to therapy and with each cycle of administration. Assessable patients underwent radiographic evaluation for response after two cycles of therapy. Objective responses were compared to trends in CA125 values at the end of cycles 1 and 2. CA125 changes were categorized as baseline (+/-10%), +/- 10%-25% variance, and > 25% variance. RESULTS: Among patients treated with PLD, 50% of complete responders (CR) and 41% of partial responders (PR) had increases in CA125 from baseline to cycle 1. Increases in CA125 were also seen in topotecan-treated patients; however, fewer patients had increases (20% and 8%, respectively). Overall, 15% of responding patients (CR + PR) receiving PLD and 6% receiving topotecan had elevated CA125 after two cycles of therapy. For those patients achieving a partial response, 19% of PLD-treated patients and 8% of topotecan-treated patients had CA125 levels above baseline at cycle 2. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable intrapatient variation in CA125 values is present among responding patients. Early increases in CA125 may not predict ultimate outcome, especially in PLD-treated patients.     

A pilot study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer

Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum is the most effective regimen for advanced ovarian cancer. Second-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel (135 mg/m2, 24 h) and carboplatin (AUC 5-6) is also effective for patients who relapse on the same regimen after 6 months or more. However, it has been shown that the same efficacy and less myelosuppression can be achieved with a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel (135 mg/m2), and that dose intensification of carboplatin to an AUC values larger than 4-6 is meaningless. Therefore, we decided to conduct a pilot study of paclitaxel (135 mg/m2, 3 h) and carboplatin (AUC 4-5) for ovarian cancer patients who had relapsed or were resistant to a platinum-containing regimen without paclitaxel. Eligibility criteria included patients with relapsed or resistant ovarian cancer (no specified duration from prior therapy), age 16-75 years, with performance status 0-2, and adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. Paclitaxel was administered at a fixed dose of 135 mg/m2 followed by one of two carboplatin doses (AUC 4 or 5). Specific doses were alternated between individual patients by the order in which they entered the study. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks, and more than 4 cycles were administered. A total of 11 patients were enrolled. Carboplatin was administered to 6 patients at an AUC of 4 and to 5 patients at an AUC of 5. The age of patients ranged from 18 to 65 years (median: 54). Other patient data (number of patients): serous (8), non serous (3), patients with measurable disease (9), assessable/CA 125 (3), study drug administration less than 6 months after prior therapy (5), study drug administration 6 months or more after prior therapy (6). Response was defined by CT and CA 125 level. CR was observed in 25% (2/8), PR in 38% (3/8), NC in 25% (2/8), and PD in 13% (1/8) of the patients. The response rate with assessable patients was 100% (3/3), and the overall response rate was 73% (8/11). Two patients with grade 1 tachycardia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively, refused further treatment after 2 cycles. No other patients experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity or grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity. The median survival duration after paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy was 21+ months (6-26+ months). This regimen is easy to manage in heavily pretreated patients and seems to have good efficacy. To further assess the efficacy, a phase II study is needed.     

First-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without epirubicin (TEC versus TC)--a gynecologic cancer intergroup study of the NSGO, EORTC GCG and NCIC CTG

Background The addition of anthracyclines to platinum-based chemotherapy may provide benefit in survival in ovarian cancer patients. We evaluated the effect on survival of adding epirubicin to standard carboplatin and paclitaxel. Patients and methods We carried out a prospectively randomized phase III study comparing carboplatin plus paclitaxel (TC; area under the curve 5 and 175 mg/m(2)) with the same combination and epirubicin (TEC; 75 mg/m(2) i.v.). Between March 1999 and August 2001, 887 patients with epithelial ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIB-IV were randomized to receive either TC (442 patients) or TEC (445 patients). Results Median time to progression was 16.4 months in the TEC arm and 16.0 months in the TC arm (hazard ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9-1.2). Median overall survival time was 42.4 months for the TEC arm and 40.2 for the TC arm (hazard ratio 0.96; 95% CI: 0.8-1.1). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxic effects and most grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxic effects were more frequent in the TEC arm. Accordingly, a quality-of-life analysis showed inferiority of TEC versus TC. Conclusion The addition of epirubicin to standard carboplatin and paclitaxel treatment did not improve survival in patients with advanced ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer.     

Topotecan plus carboplatin versus standard therapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) or gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus carboplatin (PLDC): a randomized phase III trial of the NOGGO-AGO-Study Group-AGO Austria and GEICO-ENGOT-GCIG intergroup study (HECTOR)

The combination of carboplatin and topotecan in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer could not improve progression-free survival or overall survival compared with established standard regimens.BackgroundRandomized, phase III trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of topotecan and carboplatin (TC) compared with standard platinum-based combinations in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC).Patients and methodsPatients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental TC arm (topotecan 0.75 mg/m²/ days 1–3 and carboplatin AUC 5 on day 3 every 3 weeks) or to one of the standard regimes [(PC) paclitaxel plus carboplatin; (GC) gemcitabine plus carboplatin; (PLDC) pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin] which could be chosen by individual preference but before randomization. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) after 12 months. Overall survival (OS), response rate, toxicity, quality of life and treatment preference regarding standard treatment were defined as secondary end points.ResultsA total of 550 patients were recruited. The PFS rate after 12 months was 37.0% for TC compared with 40.2% in the standard combinations (P = 0.470). The overall response rate was 73.1% for TC versus 75.1% for standard combinations (P = 0.149). After a median follow-up of 20 months, the median PFS was 10 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.4–10.6] and did not differ between both arms (P = 0.414). The median OS was 25 months in the TC arm versus 31 months in the standard arm (95% CI: 22.4–27.6 resp. 26.0–36.0; P = 0.163). Severe hematologic toxicities (grade 3/4) were rare in the experimental arm (P < 0.001), with 17.4% leucopenia, 27.8% neutropenia and 15.9% thrombopenia.ConclusionThe combination of carboplatin and topotecan was well tolerated with significant lower rates of severe hematological toxicities but did not improve PFS or OS in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer compared with established standard regimens.     

Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin Chemotherapy for Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: A Study of 22 Cases and Comparison with Stage III–IV Ovarian Serous Carcinoma

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with either primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) or ovarian serous carcinoma (OSC) treated with paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy. We retrospectively identified 22 PPC patients and 55 stage III–IV OSC patients treated between 2002 and 2007. After exploratory laparotomy, all patients received paclitaxel and carboplatin every 3 weeks, with the goal of optimal cytoreduction. There were no statistically significant differences between the PPC and OSC groups with regard to tumor stage, residual tumor after debulking surgery (initial or interval), serum cancer antigen (CA) 125 levels at diagnosis, and completion of first-line chemotherapy. The progression-free survival (PFS) durations were 12.7 months (95% CI, 6.3–18.5) in the patients with PPC and 15.9 months (95% CI, 13.3–18.5) in those with OSC (p = 0.016). However, the median survival durations were 26.5 months (95% CI, 14.6–38.3) in the patients with PPC and 38 months (95% CI, 23.8–53.8) in those with OSC (p = 0.188). Survival was longer for all patients whose CA125 levels normalized to 26 U/ml during and after treatment. Overall survival (OS) of the patients with PPC was similar to that of the patients with OSC, suggesting that management for advanced-stage OSC would be similar to that for PPC. The combination of optimal debulking with paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy may offer patients the most effective treatment. The CA125 nadir after cytoreductive surgery can be considered a prognostic factor for OS and PFS in patients with PPC.Key words: Primary peritoneal carcinoma, Paclitaxel, Carboplatin     

25例晚期及复发子宫内膜癌紫杉醇联合化疗分析

[目的]评价紫杉醇联合化疗治疗晚期、复发子宫内膜癌的近期疗效及毒副作用.[方法]25例Ⅲ、Ⅳ期或复发的子宫内膜癌行紫杉醇 卡铂(或顺铂)化疗,紫杉醇135mg/m2～150mg/m2,卡铂AUC 4～5,或顺铂70mg/m2.[结果]有可测肿瘤或CA125/CA199升高16例,共进行63个疗程化疗,完全缓解37.5%,部分缓解25.0%,总有效率62.5%.完全缓解者无进展期平均5.3个月.无肿瘤监测指标9例,进行29个疗程化疗,中数随诊11.5个月无复发.3、4级白细胞下降40.0%,3级血小板下降11.4%.[结论]紫杉醇 卡铂或顺铂联合化疗对晚期、复发的子宫内膜癌有较好疗效.     

CA 125 half-life and CA 125 nadir during induction chemotherapy are independent predictors of epithelial ovarian cancer outcome: results of a French multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: CA 125 assays enable treatment-response monitoring in ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicentric study of CA 125 kinetics under induction chemotherapy was performed in 631 patients. CA 125 half-life was calculated by mono-compartmental logarithmic regression. Nadir CA 125 concentration and time to nadir were also studied. Survival analyses for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) used univariate (Kaplan-Meier) and multivariate (Cox) models. RESULTS: For 553 stage IIC-IV patients, 459 (83.0%) relapsed and 444 (80.3%) died from cancer. Median (range) follow up time was 32 months (2-214 months). Median (range) for CA 125 kinetics were: 263 kU/l (5-52000 kU/l) before 1st course, 15.8 days (4.5-417.9 days) for CA 125 half-life, 16 kU/l (3-2610 kU/l) for nadir and 85 days (0-361 days) for time to nadir. Pre-chemotherapy CA 125, its half-life, nadir concentration and time to nadir all had a univariate prognostic value for DFS and OS (P<0.0001). In Cox models, CA 125 half-life, residual tumour (P<0.0001 for both), nadir concentration (P=0.0002) and stage (P=0.0118) were the most powerful prognostic factors for DFS. For OS, the significant variables were similar, with age ranking last (P=0.0319). CONCLUSION: Among well-established prognostic factors in ovarian cancers, CA 125 half-life and nadir concentration bear a strong and independent prognostic value.     

Topotecan compared with no therapy after response to surgery and carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with ovarian cancer: Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer (MITO-1) randomized study.

PURPOSE: Topotecan is an active second-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Its efficacy as consolidation treatment after first-line standard chemotherapy is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To investigate whether topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 5, four cycles, every 3 weeks) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) for patients responding to standard carboplatin (area under the curve 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) administered as a 3-hour infusion in six cycles; CP), a multicenter phase III study was performed with an 80% power to detect a 50% prolongation of median PFS. Patients were registered at diagnosis and randomized after the end of CP. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-three patients were randomly assigned (topotecan, n = 137; observation, n = 136), with a median age of 56 years. Stage at diagnosis was advanced in three fourths of patients (stage III in 65% of patients; stage IV in 10%); after primary surgery, 46% had no residual disease and 20% were optimally debulked. After CP, 87% reached a clinical complete response, and 13% achieved a partial response. Neutropenia (grade 3/4 in 58% of the patients) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3 in 21%; grade 4 in 3%) were the most frequent toxicities attributed to topotecan. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the arms (P =.83; log-rank test): median PFS was 18.2 months in the topotecan arm and 28.4 in the control arm. Hazard ratio of progression for patients receiving topotecan was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.63) after adjustment for residual disease, interval debulking surgery, and response to CP. CONCLUSION: The present analysis indicates that consolidation with topotecan does not improve PFS for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who respond to initial chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel.     

Phase I pharmacokinetic trial and correlative in vitro phase II tumor kinetic study of Apomine (SR-45023A), a novel oral biphosphonate anticancer drug.

PURPOSE: To study the human pharmacokinetics and in vitro cytotoxicity of Apomine, an p.o. administered, nonmyelosuppressive agent that selectively inhibits cell proliferation and induces tumor cell apoptosis through the farnesoid X receptor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Seven solid cancer patients who participated in an ongoing Phase I study of Apomine and received the starting dose level of 125 mg/m(2)/day x 14 days every 3 weeks underwent a pharmacokinetic study on day 14 of the first course. Plasma concentrations of Apomine were assayed with a Hewlett Packard gas chromatograph using a nitrogen phosphorus detector and HP-5 15m x 0.32-mm column. Fresh human ovarian cancer tumor samples were obtained during initial exploratory laparotomy from 35 chemotherapy-naive, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Tumor samples were tested for sensitivity to Apomine, carboplatin, cisplatin, paclitaxel, and topotecan using an in vitro clonogenic [(3)H]thymidine end point assay. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a mean Apomine plasma C(max) of 16.4 +/- 9.1 microg/ml (29.1 microM), a mean plasma AUC(0--12 h) of 173.4 +/- 105 microg. h/ml (308 microM. h), and a mean t(1/2 (24--192 h)) of 156.2 +/- 42.9 h. In vitro assay results showed that 63 and 91% of the ovarian cancers were sensitive (i.e., >70% inhibition of tumor cell growth) to Apomine at concentrations of 10 and 20 microM. The sensitivity rates were 91% for carboplatin (270 microM), 88% for cisplatin (33 microM), 41% for paclitaxel (5.9 microM), and 85% for topotecan (2.2 microM). CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro assay results, taken together with our preliminary plasma pharmacokinetic data, suggest that Apomine should be clinically active at the 125 mg/m(2) dose level.