Effect of discontinuation of alendronate treatment and exercise on bone mass and physical fitness: 15-month follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the remaining effects of 12-month intervention of alendronate and exercise on selected risk factors of fragility fractures in 15-month follow-up after withdrawal of intervention among early postmenopausal women. The trial consisted four experimental groups: (1) 5 mg of alendronate daily + exercise (Al+Ex+), (2) 5 mg alendronate daily (Al+Ex-), (3) placebo + exercise (Al-Ex+), and (4) placebo (Al-Ex-). At the follow-up measurements, bone mass and physical fitness of 102 women (mean age 53.5 +/- 2.5 years) out of initial 150 subjects could be evaluated. Alendronate increased bone mass significantly [mean; 95% confidence interval (CI)] during the intervention at the lumbar spine (3.9%; 2.2% to 5.7%) and femoral neck (2.1%; 0.9% to 3.4%). After withdrawal of alendronate, bone loss resumed to the rate comparable to that evident in the placebo group. Despite the declining bone mass, the between-group mean difference (3.2%; 1.0% to 5.4%) remained at the lumbar spine. However, the benefits at the femoral neck had disappeared 15 months after the withdrawal of alendronate. The 12-month exercise training resulted in significant increases in muscle power, dynamic balance, and aerobic capacity with no benefits on bone mass. Fifteen months later, these performance variables had declined among both the exercisers and nonexercisers. Although the between-group differences were no longer statistically significant, muscle power, dynamic balance, and aerobic capacity of those who exercised still remained above the pretraining levels. In conclusion, 12-month treatment with alendronate prevented postmenopausal bone loss, and residual effect was seen 15 months after withdrawal of the drug at the lumbar spine. Similarly, exercise improved muscle power, agility, and aerobic capacity during the intervention, but the improvement was lost after the cessation of the exercise program. Based on these results, it was evident that to maintain the benefits of alendronate or exercise, therapy should be continued.     

A systematic review of the effect of alendronate on bone mineral density in men.

Alendronate is known to increase bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip in women, but less information is available in men. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to determine whether oral alendronate improves BMD at the lumbar spine and hip in men with low bone mass or prevalent fractures, compared with men treated with placebo, calcium, or vitamin D. In three trials in men, BMD (measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) increased at 2-3 yr (compared to baseline) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck in alendronate-treated patients compared to controls. The pooled estimates of changes in BMD with 10 mg of alendronate daily compared to controls were as follows: 7.8% over 2-3 yr (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.8- 10.8) at the lumbar spine and 3.8% (95% CI = 2.3-5.3) at the femoral neck (p < 0.001 for treatment effect in each analysis). Statistically significant heterogeneity of treatment effect was noted between trials. We conclude that 10 mg of oral daily alendronate is significantly associated with increase in BMD at the lumbar spine and hip in men over 2-3 yr and that these changes are similar to those previously observed in postmenopausal women.     

12周社区运动干预对绝经后骨质疏松症女性骨密度的影响研究

目的探讨四种运动方式对绝经后骨质疏松症女性骨密度(bone mineral density, BMD)的干预效果,并比较不同运动方式对股骨颈和腰椎L_(2～4)骨密度干预效果的差异。方法采用负重、自重、跳跃和健步走四种训练方式对社区51名绝经后骨质疏松症女性进行为期12周的训练;采用GE双能X线骨密度仪测量股骨颈和腰椎L_(2～4)骨密度;组内比较用配对样本t检验(正态分布)和Mann-Whitney检验(非正态分布),组间比较采用单因素ANOVA检验或秩和检验干预前后BMD的差值,P0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果与干预前相比,整体上运动组股骨颈和腰椎L_(2～4) BMD在干预后的变化均表现出增长趋势,而对照组的BMD则呈减少趋势;运动组股骨颈BMD相对基线的增长率表现为负重组健步组自重组跳跃组(1.91%1.34%0.72%0.24%),腰椎L_(2～4)BMD增长率则表现为健步组跳跃组负重组自重组(29.07%11.17%4.22%0.01%)。结论运动可有效缓解绝经后骨质疏松症女性骨量丢失,不同方式的运动对不同部位骨骼的作用效果也不一样,负重训练对股骨颈BMD的改善效果最好,而健步走则对腰椎BMD的作用效果最优。具有冲击性的健步走和跳跃训练对腰椎BMD的改善要好于非冲击性的负重和自重训练,负重训练对股骨颈和腰椎BMD作用均要好于自重训练。     

Comparison of the Effect of Denosumab and Alendronate on BMD and Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass: A Randomized,Blinded, Phase 3 Trial

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits bone resorption by neutralizing RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival. This phase 3, multicenter, double‐blind study compared the efficacy and safety of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. One thousand one hundred eighty‐nine postmenopausal women with a T‐score ≤ ?2.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous denosumab injections (60 mg every 6 mo [Q6M]) plus oral placebo weekly (n = 594) or oral alendronate weekly (70 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo injections Q6M (n = 595). Changes in BMD were assessed at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, lumbar spine, and one‐third radius at 6 and 12 mo and in bone turnover markers at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and laboratory values. At the total hip, denosumab significantly increased BMD compared with alendronate at month 12 (3.5% versus 2.6%; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, significantly greater increases in BMD were observed with denosumab treatment at all measured skeletal sites (12‐mo treatment difference: 0.6%, femoral neck; 1.0%, trochanter; 1.1%, lumbar spine; 0.6%, one‐third radius; p ≤ 0.0002 all sites). Denosumab treatment led to significantly greater reduction of bone turnover markers compared with alendronate therapy. Adverse events and laboratory values were similar for denosumab‐ and alendronate‐treated subjects. Denosumab showed significantly larger gains in BMD and greater reduction in bone turnover markers compared with alendronate. The overall safety profile was similar for both treatments.     

Alendronate treatment results in similar levels of trabecular bone remodeling in the femoral neck and vertebra

Summary  We aimed to determine whether trabecular bone in sites that have different surface-based remodeling rates, the femoral neck and vertebra, are differently affected by alendronate treatment. Alendronate treatment resulted in similar levels of turnover in both sites, suggesting that a lower limit of bone turnover suppression with alendronate may exist. Introduction  Bone turnover suppression in sites that already have a low surface-based remodeling rate may lead to oversuppression that could have negative effects on the biomechanical properties of bone. The goal was to determine how alendronate suppresses bone turnover at sites with different surface-based remodeling rates. Methods  Dynamic histomorphometric parameters were assessed in trabecular bone of the femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae obtained from skeletally mature beagles treated with saline (1 ml/kg/day) or alendronate (ALN 0.2 or 1.0 mg/kg/day). The ALN0.2 and ALN1.0 doses approximate, on a milligram per kilogram basis, the clinical doses used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and Paget’s disease, respectively. Results  Alendronate treatment resulted in similar absolute levels of bone turnover in the femoral neck and vertebrae, although the femoral neck had 33% lower pre-treatment surface-based remodeling rate than the vertebra (p < 0.05). Additionally, the high dose of alendronate (ALN 1.0) suppressed bone turnover to similar absolute levels as the low dose of alendronate (ALN 0.2) in both sites. Conclusions  Alendronate treatment may result in a lower limit of trabecular bone turnover suppression, suggesting that sites of low pre-treatment remodeling rate are not more susceptible to oversuppression than those of high pre-treatment remodeling rate.     

阿伦膦酸盐对绝经后骨质疏松妇女骨密度的影响

为了解阿伦膦酸盐对骨密度的影响及其安全性和耐受性,对２０名绝经后骨质疏松的妇女中进行阿伦膦酸盐（ａｌｅｎｄｒｏｎａｔｅ）１０ｍｇ／天和安慰剂的随机、双盲、前瞻性研究,为期一年。结果显示,１年后阿伦膦酸盐组与安慰剂组相比,骨密度平均增长率：椎骨分别为４．８７％与－０．２３％;股骨颈分别为６．８９％与－１．８４％,（Ｐ＜０．０５）。副反应仅为轻微胃肠道反应。结论：阿伦膦酸盐能有效增加骨密度,且药物安全,耐受性好     

Multinational, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of the Effects of Alendronate on Bone Density and Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass: Results of the FOSIT Study

This randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the safety, tolerability and effects on bone mineral density (BMD) of alendronate in a large, multinational population of postmenopausal women with low bone mass. At 153 centers in 34 countries, 1908 otherwise healthy, postmenopausal women with lumbar spine BMD 2 standard deviations or more below the premenopausal adult mean were randomly assigned to receive oral alendronate 10 mg (n = 950) or placebo (n = 958) once daily for 1 year. All patients received 500 mg elemental calcium daily. Baseline characteristics of patients in the two treatment groups were similar. At 12 months, mean increases in BMD were significantly (p相似文献   

Alendronate Treatment in Men With Primary Osteoporosis: A Three-Year Longitudinal Study

Bisphosphonates have been widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis in women, whereas until now there have been few data on their use in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a 3-year alendronate treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in men with primary osteoporosis. We studied 77 osteoporotic men (aged 57.1 ± 10.8 yrs) who completed a 3-year treatment with alendronate (10 mg/day) plus calcium (1000 mg/day) (n = 39), or calcium alone (n = 38). At baseline and at a 12-month interval, we measured BMD at the lumbar spine and femur (femoral neck and total hip) by DXA (Hologic) and speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and Stiffness (S) at the os calcis by Achilles plus (Lunar). Alendronate treatment had significantly increased lumbar spine BMD by 4.2% at year 1, by 6.3% at year 2, and 8.8% at year 3. BMD at the femoral neck and total hip had increased by 2.1% and 1.6% at year 1, by 3.2% and 2.9% at year 2, and by 4.2% and 3.9% at year 3, respectively. BUA and Stiffness showed a significant increase in the alendronate-treated group at year 2 (3.2% and 4.9%, respectively) and at year 3 (3.8% and 6%, respectively). BMD at the lumbar spine showed the best longitudinal sensitivity whereas longitudinal sensitivity of both QUS at the heel and femur BMD were similar. In conclusion, this study confirms that alendronate represents an important therapeutic advance in the management of male osteoporosis. BMD at the lumbar spine appears to be the best method for monitoring the effect of alendronate on bone mass in osteoporotic men.     

Alendronate prevents bone loss in Chinese women with osteoporosis

The objectives of the Hong Kong study are to investigate the efficacy of 10 mg alendronate in preventing bone loss at the hip and spine in osteoporotic Chinese women. One hundred osteoporotic Chinese women, aged 60-79 years, were randomized to receive 10 mg of alendronate or placebo, with 500 mg elemental calcium. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and hip were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Seventy-eight subjects completed the study. The alendronate-treated group gained more bone at both the spine (p < 0.01) and femoral neck (p < 0.001), with a mean difference (+/-SE) of 2.4% (+/-0.86%) at the spine and 3.98% (+/-0.95%) at the femoral neck. Of the 100 patients, 6 subjects in the alendronate group and 5 subjects in the placebo group had mild gastrointestinal symptoms. We conclude that alendronate (10 mg) was effective in preventing bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporotic Chinese women.     

Treatment of renal transplant recipients with low bone mineral density: a randomized prospective trial of alendronate, alfacalcidol, and alendronate combined with alfacalcidol

We sought to compare the treatment modalities of alendronate, alfacalcidol, and alendronate combined with alfacalcidol in renal transplant recipients with low bone mineral density. Sixty-four kidney graft recipients (22 women, 42 men) were recruited to this study. Of these 64 patients, 9 served as the control group with T scores more than -1. The remaining 55 patients randomly assigned to treatment had T scores less than -1 and were assigned to 3 groups: group 1 received alfacalcidol (0.5 microg/d); group 2, alendronate (10 mg/d); and group 3, alendronate (10 mg/d) + alfacalcidol (0.5 microg/d per os). Twenty-five patients were allocated to alfacalcidol, 13 patients to alendronate, and 17 patients to alendronate + alfacalcidol treatment. Bone mineral densities of the lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured before and 12 months after treatment. The groups were compared for risk factors of osteoporosis, biochemistry, and bone mineral density. Kruskal-Wallis, one-way ANOVA, and Student t tests were used. With the alendronate + alfacalcidol group, bone mineral density at the lumbar spine significantly increased by 7.9% (P = .006) with a significant improvement in T score (P = .003). Bone mineral density at the femoral neck significantly increased by 8% in the alendronate + alfacalcidol group (P = .01) with a significant improvement in T score (P = .02). The use of a combination of alendronate and alfacalcidol seemed to be safe and more effective than the separate use of the 2 agents to improve bone mass in renal transplant recipients.     

Jumping improves hip and lumbar spine bone mass in prepubescent children: a randomized controlled trial.

Physical activity during childhood is advocated as one strategy for enhancing peak bone mass (bone mineral content [BMC]) as a means to reduce osteoporosis-related fractures. Thus, we investigated the effects of high-intensity jumping on hip and lumbar spine bone mass in children. Eighty-nine prepubescent children between the ages of 5.9 and 9.8 years were randomized into a jumping (n = 25 boys and n = 20 girls) or control group (n = 26 boys and n = 18 girls). Both groups participated in the 7-month exercise intervention during the school day three times per week. The jumping group performed 100, two-footed jumps off 61-cm boxes each session, while the control group performed nonimpact stretching exercises. BMC (g), bone area (BA; cm2), and bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm2) of the left proximal femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Hologic QDR/4500-A). Peak ground reaction forces were calculated across 100, two-footed jumps from a 61-cm box. In addition, anthropometric characteristics (height, weight, and body fat), physical activity, and dietary calcium intake were assessed. At baseline there were no differences between groups for anthropometric characteristics, dietary calcium intake, or bone variables. After 7 months, jumpers and controls had similar increases in height, weight, and body fat. Using repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA; covariates, initial age and bone values, and changes in height and weight) for BMC, the primary outcome variable, jumpers had significantly greater 7-month changes at the femoral neck and lumbar spine than controls (4.5% and 3.1%, respectively). In repeated measures ANCOVA of secondary outcomes (BMD and BA), BMD at the lumbar spine was significantly greater in jumpers than in controls (2.0%) and approached statistical significance at the femoral neck (1.4%; p = 0.085). For BA, jumpers had significantly greater increases at the femoral neck area than controls (2.9%) but were not different at the spine. Our data indicate that jumping at ground reaction forces of eight times body weight is a safe, effective, and simple method of improving bone mass at the hip and spine in children. This program could be easily incorporated into physical education classes.     

Alendronate in the prevention of bone loss after a fracture of the lower leg.

Fracture of a leg and the consequent absence from weight-bearing lead to local bone loss. A 1-year, single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted, to determine whether bone loss would occur in the proximal femur and the calcaneus after a fracture of the lower leg and whether this loss could be prevented by the antiresorptive drug bisphosphonate alendronate. Twenty-three men and 18 women with a recent unstable fracture of the lower leg were randomized to receive either 10 mg of alendronate daily or placebo. Bone mineral density (BMD) of both hips and the lumbar spine was measured at baseline and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after start of the treatment. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements of the calcaneus were performed at baseline on the noninjured side and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after start of treatment on both sides. After 1 year, in the placebo group, there was a significant decrease from baseline in BMD of the hip on the side of the fracture. In the alendronate group, there was no significant change from baseline. The differences in BMD between the two treatment groups on the side of the fracture were significant in all sites of the hip: 4.4% (p = 0.016) in the trochanter, 4.6% (p = 0.016) in the femoral neck, and 3.9% (p = 0.009) in the total hip. In the hip on the contralateral side, there were no significant changes from baseline in either treatment group and there was no difference between the two treatment groups. BMD in the lumbar spine increased in the alendronate group, and after 1 year there was a significant difference between the active treatment and placebo group of 3.4% (p = 0.04). One year after fracture, ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus in the placebo group were significantly lower on the fractured side compared with the contralateral side (p < 0.01). In the alendronate group, no significant difference between the two sides was observed. In conclusion, BMD of the proximal femur was still decreased 1 year after a fracture of the lower leg. Alendronate prevented this bone loss.     

Effects of two intermittent alendronate regimens in the prevention or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

In clinical practice, a large proportion of patients have bone mass values for which a therapeutic intervention is considered necessary, but the accepted aim might be the sole preservation or marginal increases of the actual bone mass. These goals might be achieved with lower or intermittent doses of a powerful agent for the purpose of fewer side effects and improved compliance. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of two intermittent alendronate regimens in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. One hundred twenty-four postmenopausal women (age range 52-75 years, at least 7 years since last menopause) with a bone mineral density (BMD) at either the femoral neck or lumbar spine of 2 SD below the mean values of young healthy individuals, and without a history of previous osteoporotic fracture, were randomly assigned either to calcium/vitamin D supplements, alone or associated with two different intermittent oral alendronate regimens: 20 mg once a week (weekly alendronate group) or 10 mg daily (orally) for 1 month out of 3 (cyclical alendronate group). After 1 year, in both groups given intermittent alendronate, we observed significant increases in BMD at both the spine (+2.2 +/- 2.6 and +2.5 +/- 2.9) and femoral neck (+1.6 +/- 4.8 and +1.5 +/- 2.2) for the weekly and cyclical regimens, respectively. This was associated with a significant diminution of both serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urinary N-telopeptides of collagen type I excretion. In the patients in the control group BMD decreased significantly at the lumbar spine, with a slight decline of serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. Compliance with treatment and drug tolerability were good in both alendronate groups. In conclusion, intermittent alendronate administration at cumulative doses (and costs) three times lower than those currently recommended for osteoporosis treatment is very well accepted, and is able to significantly increase BMD at the spine and femoral neck and to decrease the markers of bone turnover. These regimens can be clinically useful in the long-term treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis without prevalent osteoporotic fractures, particularly in women with lower compliance for continuous administration.     

Risedronate Increases Bone Density and Reduces Vertebral Fracture Risk Within One Year in Men on Corticosteroid Therapy

Limited information is available on the effect of bisphosphonates in men receiving corticosteroid therapy. We studied 184 men among the patients enrolled in two, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 1-year studies with similar protocols. The studies evaluated the effects of risedronate in patients beginning corticosteroid treatment at a dose of at least 7.5 mg per day of prednisone or equivalent (prevention study) or continuing long-term treatment of corticosteroid at that dose (treatment study). The men received either placebo or risedronate (2.5 mg or 5 mg) daily, along with calcium supplementation (500-1000 mg). Endpoints included differences in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter, assessment of vertebral fractures, changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover, and overall safety. In the treatment study, risedronate 5 mg significantly (P < 0.01) increased lumbar spine BMD by 4.8% at the lumbar spine, 2.1% at the femoral neck, and 2.6% at the femoral trochanter compared with baseline values. In the prevention study, bone loss was prevented with risedronate 5 mg; in the placebo group, BMD decreased significantly (P < 0.01) by 3.4%, 3.3%, and 3.4% in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter, respectively, at 1 year. The differences between risedronate 5 mg and placebo groups were significant at all skeletal sites in the prevention study (P < 0.01) and at the lumbar spine in the treatment study (P < 0.001). The 2.5 mg dose also had a positive effect on BMD, although of a lesser magnitude than the 5 mg dose. When the data from the two studies were combined, the incidence of vertebral fractures decreased 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 36.6%-95.1%) in the pooled risedronate groups compared with placebo (P = 0.008). Risedronate was well tolerated in men, with a similar incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in the placebo and treatment groups. Daily treatment with risedronate increases bone density and decreases vertebral fracture risk within 1 year in men receiving corticosteroid therapy.     

男性强直性脊柱炎患者骨密度与血尿酸水平相关性研究

目的分析强直性脊柱炎(ankylosing spondylitis,AS)男性患者骨密度(bone mineral density,BMD)与血尿酸(serum uric acid,SUA)的相关关系。方法回顾性分析2013年9月到2018年9月在中日友好医院确诊的143名男性AS患者,按腰椎、股骨颈、股骨粗隆BMD水平各分为正常骨量组和骨量减少组。比较两组间患者临床基本资料、疾病活动程度指标等的差异;使用多元回归分析评估SUA水平与男性AS患者各部位BMD的关系;使用Logistic回归模型预测SUA与各部位BMD之间的风险概率;构建列线图预测男性AS患者腰椎及股骨粗隆发生骨量减少的风险。结果两组间比较结果显示,身高、腰椎、股骨颈、股骨粗隆BMD比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。多元线性回归分析提示SUA水平与腰椎、股骨粗隆的BMD呈正相关。Logistic回归分析结果提示,SUA每降低78 mmol/L发生腰椎和股骨粗隆骨量减少的风险分别升高18%和17%。通过构建的列线图可预测男性AS患者发生腰椎及股骨粗隆骨量减少的风险。结论SUA水平低可能会增加男性AS患者腰椎和股骨粗隆骨量减少的风险,SUA具有反映男性AS患者骨量减少风险的潜力。     

Systematic Review of Randomized Trials of the Effect of Exercise on Bone Mass in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women

Studies of the effect of exercise programs on bone mass appear inconsistent. Our objective was to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone mass in pre- and postmenopausal women. A computerized MEDLINE search was conducted for the years 1966–1997. Thirty-five randomized trials were identified. Meta-analytic methods were used to statistically pool results of studies of the effect of impact (e.g., aerobics) and non-impact (e.g., weight training) exercise on the lumbar spine and femoral neck. The most studied bone site was the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women (15 studies), where both impact [1.6% bone loss prevented, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.0%–2.2%] and non-impact (1.0%, 95% CI: 0.4%–1.6%) exercise programs had a positive effect. Results for the lumbar spine in premenopausal women (eight studies) were similar: 1.5% (95% CI: 0.6%–2.4%) less bone loss (or net gain) after impact exercise and 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7%–1.7%) after non-impact exercise. Impact exercise programs appeared to have a positive effect at the femoral neck in postmenopausal women (five studies), 1.0% (95% CI: 0.4%–1.6%) bone loss prevented, and possibly in premenopausal women, 0.9% (95% CI: −0.2%–2.0%) bone loss prevented. There were too few trials to draw conclusions from meta-analyses of the effect of nonimpact exercise on the neck of femur. This systematic review of randomized trials shows that both impact and non-impact exercise have a positive effect at the lumbar spine in pre- and postmenopausal women. Impact exercise probably has a positive effect at the femoral neck. More studies are required to determine the optimal intensity and type of exercise. Received: 11 May 1999 / Accepted: 18 January 2000     

阿仑膦酸钠治疗伴骨质疏松症的髋部骨折

目的　观察阿仑膦酸钠 (固邦 )治疗髋部骨折的骨质疏松症患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法　对 77例髋部骨折的骨质疏松症患者进行为期 1年随机双盲对照研究。用骨密度测量仪测定骨密度。结果　固邦治疗 1年时 ,腰椎、股骨颈、Wards三角、大转子骨密度分别平均增加 7 0 %±13 0 %、7 3%± 11 1%、4 6 %± 5 9%、4 5 %± 3 2 % ,安慰剂组增加 - 2 0 %± 4 5 %、0 9%± 6 9%、-3 6 %± 4 9% ,- 1 14 %± 6 0 %、两组差异有显著意义 (P <0 0 5 )。治疗前后用药组及对照组血Ca、血P、血ALP、血BGP及尿Pyd/Cr差异均无显著性意义。副作用轻微 ,为一过性 ,主要为消化道反应。结论　阿仑膦酸钠治疗骨质疏松症骨折显著有效并且安全     

Effects of alendronate on osteopenic postmenopausal Chinese women

To evaluate the effects of alendronate on postmenopausal Chinese women with osteopenia, we treated 46 subjects daily with either 10 mg alendronate (N = 24) or placebo plus 500 mg calcium supplement (N = 22), and measured their bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip, and urinary bone resorption markers before, during, and after the 1 year treatment period. The bone markers included N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) and deoxypyridinoline (Dpd); both were corrected by the concentration of creatinine in the same sample (NTx/Cr and Dpd/Cr). Both NTx/Cr and Dpd/Cr decreased significantly by 44% and 28%, respectively (p < 0.05 for both), in 1 month in the active treatment group but did not change in the placebo group. BMD at the spine, femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle increased significantly by 6 months and showed a further increase through month 12 at the spine in the alendronate-treated group. Relative to the placebo group, BMD changes at various sites in the alendronate-treated group were higher at 12 months by 6%-11%. Thus, our data suggest that 10 mg alendronate daily resulted in significant increases in spine and hip BMD, and decreases of urinary resorption markers in the osteopenic postmenopausal Chinese women studied. The amplitude of responses was higher than in previous reports in the USA and Europe.     

Monitoring alendronate and estradiol therapy with quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density.

Few studies have compared quantitative ultrasound with bone mineral density (BMD) in monitoring response to therapy in osteoporosis. The aim of our study was to compare finger ultrasound variables and BMD for monitoring alendronate and estradiol therapy in postmenopausal women. We recruited 26 women aged 50 to 79 yr (mean: 65 yr) with osteoporosis; 18 patients received 10 mg/d of alendronate and 500 mg/d of calcium carbonate and 8 patients received 500 mg/d of calcium carbonate only. We recruited 21 hysterectomized postmenopausal women who were randomized to treatment or control. The treatment group received a 25-mg estradiol implant, which was replaced every 6 mo. The control group had a sham procedure. In the alendronate group, there were significant changes at 1 yr at the lumbar spine (p<0.05), bone transmission time (p<0.01), and pure speed of sound (p<0.001) and the changes continued into the second year. In the estradiol implant group, there were significant changes at 1 yr at the lumbar spine (p<0.001), the femoral neck (p<0.05), and the pure speed of sound (p<0.01). For alendronate, the signal-to-noise ratio was similar between the lumbar spine and bone transmission time (1.8 and 1.4) and greater than for the pure speed of sound and femoral neck (0.8 and 0.7); for estradiol, the signal-to-noise ratio was similar between the lumbar spine and femoral neck (2.0 and 1.5) and greater than for the pure speed of sound and bone transmission time (1.1 and 0.6).These results indicated that changes in finger ultrasound are similar in clinical utility to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements at the femoral neck for the monitoring of antiresorptive treatments for osteoporosis.     

Effect of alendronate on bone mineral density and bone turnover in Thai postmenopausal osteoporosis

Alendronate has recently been approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and its efficacy has been demonstrated in many Western countries. Our present study was performed to evaluate the effect of alendronate on bone mineral density (BMD) and its tolerability in Thais. Eighty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis participated in this study. After giving informed consent, the subjects were randomly allocated either 10mg alendronate or placebo in a double-blind fashion. All patients received a supplement of 500mg elemental calcium daily. BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and distal forearm was measured at baseline and 6 and 12 months after treatment. Biochemical markers of bone resorption were determined at baseline and 6 months after treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar in both alendronate- and placebo-treated groups. Ten subjects discontinued the study. Of 70 subjects, 32 received 10mg alendronate daily and the remaining subjects received placebo. At 1 year, BMD in the alendronate-treated group had increased from baseline by 9.2%, 4.6%, and 3.1% at lumbar spine, femoral neck, and distal forearm, respectively. These percentages were greater than those in controls (4.1%, 0.6%, and 1.0%, respectively). Urinary N-terminal telopeptide (NTx)-I and serum C-terminal telopeptide (CTx)-I levels decreased in both groups after 6 months of treatment. However, more reduction was demonstrated in the alendronate-treated group (71.9% vs. 28.4%, P 0.01, and 84.7% vs. 33.1%, P 0.01, respectively). Compliance with treatment and drug tolerability were good in both alendronate and placebo groups. We concluded that treatment with alendronate 10mg daily for Thai postmenopausal women with osteoporosis significantly increased BMD at all skeletal sites and reduced biochemical markers of bone resorption. It was well tolerated without any serious side effects.