Prospective Monitoring of Polyomavirus BK Replication and Impact of Pre-Emptive Intervention in Pediatric Kidney Recipients

Polyoma BK virus (BKV)-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a relevant cause of poor renal allograft survival. In a prospective analysis, we monitored BKV DNA in blood and urine samples from 62 consecutive pediatric kidney recipients. In patients with BKV replication, we analyzed the impact of reduction of maintenance immunosuppression on viral load kinetics and PVAN in patients with BKV replication. BKV-specific immunity was concomitantly evaluated on blood samples of viremic patients, by measuring the frequency of BKV-specific interferon-gamma-producing and cytotoxic T cells, and BKV IgG antibody levels. At a median follow-up of 24 months, BK viruria was observed in 39 of 62 patients, while BK viremia developed in 13 patients (21%). In all viremic patients, immunosuppression reduction resulted in the clearance of viremia, and prevented development of PVAN, without increasing the rate of acute rejection or causing graft dysfunction. As a consequence of immunosuppression adjustment, an expansion of BKV-specific cellular immunity was observed that coincided with viral clearance. We conclude that treating pediatric kidney transplant patients pre-emptively with immunosuppression reduction guided by BKV DNA in blood is safe and effective to prevent onset of PVAN. BKV-specific cellular immunity may be useful to guide this intervention.     

Leflunomide treatment for polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy after kidney transplantation

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) affects 1-10% of kidney-transplant (KT) patients, with graft failure/loss in approximately 90% of cases. Reducing immunosuppression is the key treatment option, but addition of leflunomide may improve BK Virus (BKV) clearance and graft survival. In a prospective open-labeled study, 12 KT patients with biopsy-proven PVAN were treated with reduced immunosuppression and leflunomide. BKV viremia and graft function were followed. PVAN was diagnosed at 6 months (3-192) post-transplant; median serum creatinine concentration (sCC) was 189 micromol/l (92-265). After 16 months (8-30) of follow-up, the sCC was 150 micromol/l (90-378, NS). Renal function improved in six cases (50%), remained stable in two (16.6%) and deteriorated in four (33.4%), with graft loss in two (17%). Clearance of BKV viremia was observed in five (42%) cases. Side effects included anemia in six cases leading to leflunomide withdrawal in two patients, and mild thrombocytopenia. In KT patients diagnosed with PVAN, leflunomide plus reduced immunosuppression improved graft function in 66.6%, cleared BKV viremia in 42%, and resulted in side effects in 17%. This limited efficacy contrasts with other reports and falls short of expectation. We conclude that active screening, earlier diagnosis and intervention remain the cornerstones of treatment.     

Polyomavirus polymerase chain reaction as a surrogate marker of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a significant cause of allograft loss after renal transplantation. A noninvasive assay that can guide the evaluation of PVAN would be of clinical value. We compared the utility of BK virus (BKV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and urine cytology in screening for concurrent PVAN. METHODS: We used PCR to test urine and plasma samples from renal recipients simultaneously for BKV DNA. Additionally, we tested urine samples for decoy cells. Sample results were correlated with biopsy-proven PVAN. Receiver-operator characteristic curves were used to determine viral load thresholds associated with concurrent PVAN. RESULTS: In this cross-sectional study, BKV viruria, viremia, and urinary decoy cells were detected in 24%, 9%, and 13% of renal recipients, respectively. Among 114 patients who had renal allograft biopsy, four (3.5%) were diagnosed with PVAN. Using pathology as gold standard for the diagnosis of PVAN, BKV viremia threshold of >1.6E+04 copies/mL had 100% sensitivity, 96% specificity, 50% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. A BKV viruria threshold of >2.5E+07 copies/mL had 100% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 31% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. In contrast, urine decoy cells had 25% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 5% positive predictive value, and 97% negative predictive value for the diagnosis of concurrent PVAN. CONCLUSION: BKV PCR may be a clinically useful noninvasive test to identify renal recipients with concurrent PVAN. BKV DNA >1.6E+04 copies/mL of plasma and >2.5E+07 copies/mL of urine were highly associated with concurrent PVAN whereas a negative PCR test makes the diagnosis of PVAN highly unlikely.     

Prevalence and risk factors of polyomavirus BK replication in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients from a single transplant center

Mindlova M, Boucek P, Saudek F, Skibova J, Jedinakova T, Lipar K, Adamec M, Hirsch HH. Prevalence and risk factors of polyomavirus BK replication in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients from a single transplant center.
Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2011.01488.x.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: BK virus (BKV) replication is considered as a marker of risk for polyomavirus BK‐associated nephropathy (PVAN). We evaluated the occurrence and risk factors for BKV DNA positivity following simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation (SPK). Methods: Point prevalence of BK viruria and viremia was assessed in 183 SPK recipients. Real‐time polymerase chain reaction was used with a detection threshold of 10³ copies/mL. High‐level BKV positivity was defined as viruria and/or viremia >10⁷ and >10⁴ copies/mL, respectively. BKV‐positive patients were retested after 4–13 months and underwent an additional six‐month clinical follow‐up. Results: Urine and serum BKV positivity was detected in 28 (17.3% of available samples) and 7 (3.8%) patients, with high‐level viruria and viremia occurring in 6 (3.7%) and 3 (1.6%) patients, respectively. PVAN was biopsy‐confirmed in 1 and suspected as a cause of progressive renal failure in another SPK recipient. Patients with single low‐level viruria did not progress to high‐level positivity or PVAN at follow‐up. In multivariate analysis, pre‐transplant diabetes duration and delayed graft function were independently associated with BKV positivity. Conclusions: Point prevalence of high‐level BKV positivity and PVAN was low in SPK recipients from a single center. Diabetes duration and delayed graft function were independent risk factors for BKV replication.     

Histological Patterns of Polyomavirus Nephropathy: Correlation with Graft Outcome and Viral Load

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is a significant cause of allograft loss. The diagnosis requires allograft biopsy, but the impact of the histological features on diagnosis and outcome has not been described. We studied the distribution and extent of PVAN in 90 patients. Viral cytopathic changes, tubular atrophy/fibrosis and inflammation were semi-quantitatively scored and classified into histological patterns. The histological findings were correlated with viruria, viremia and graft survival. PVAN lesions were random, (multi-)focal and affected both cortex and medulla. Areas with PVAN coexisted with areas of unaffected parenchyma. In 36.5% (15/41) of biopsies with multiple tissue cores, discordant findings with PVAN-positive and -negative cores were observed. However, all patients with PVAN had decoy cells in urine as well as significant viruria and viremia (mean of 2.5 x 10(8) and 2.32 x 10(7) viral copies, respectively). Biopsies showing lesser degrees of renal scarring at the time of diagnosis were associated with, more likely, resolution of the infection, in response to decrease of immunosuppression (p = 0.001). More advanced tubulointerstitial atrophy, active inflammation and higher creatinine level at diagnosis correlated with worse graft outcome (p = 0.0002, 0.0001 and 0.0006). Due to the focal nature of PVAN, correlation of biopsy results with viruria and viremia are required for diagnosis.     

肾移植受者BK病毒感染的检测方法及免疫抑制方案对BK病毒活化的影响

目的 探讨肾移植术后受者BK病毒感染的检测方法及免疫抑制方案对BK病毒活化的影响.方法 选择1999年1月至2007年1月问进行肾移植术的200例受者为研究对象,其中100例基础免疫抑制方案为他克莫司(FK506)十霉酚酸酯(MMF)的受者作为密切观察组;另100例基础免疫抑制方案不同、但在年龄和术后是否发生急性排斥反应方面与密切观察组受者相一致(按1:1匹配)的受者作为对照观察组.在肾移植术后平均15.3个月时,分别采集所有受者的血、尿样本,行BK病毒尿沉渣Decoy细胞计数与BK病毒DNA含量的检测.分析和比较尿Decoy细胞计数、尿BK病毒含量及血BK病毒含量之间的关系;比较两组Decoy细胞、BK病毒尿症与BK病毒血症阳性率的差异.结果 200例受者的尿Decoy细胞、BK病毒尿症与病毒血症的阳性率分别为:34.0%、36.0%和16.5%.尿Decoy细胞计数与尿BK病毒含量呈正相关(r=0.714,P＜0.001),但尿液和外周血中BK病毒含量无明显相关性(P＞0.05).密切观察组的尿Decoy细胞、BK病毒尿症与BK病毒血症的阳性率分别为49%、50%和24%,对照观察组上述指标的阳性率分别是19%、22%和9%,两组的差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论 尿沉渣Decoy细胞计数方法简单、易行并敏感,可以做为BK病毒活化的指标;血、尿BK病毒DNA的检测可进一步了解病毒活化情况、筛杳BK病毒相关的移植肾肾病.FK506+MMF的组合免疫抑制方案易发生BK病毒的活化,受者术后需进行密切观察和相关的检测.     

Risk Factors for BK Virus Infection and BK Virus–Associated Nephropathy Under the Impact of Intensive Monitoring and Pre-emptive Immunosuppression Reduction

BackgroundBK virus (BKV) nephropathy (BKVN) is an increasingly recognized cause of kidney allograft loss and is thought to be related to the newer, more potent immunosuppressive agents. However, the risk factors for different types of BKV infection under the impact of intensive monitoring and reduction of maintenance immunosuppression are not well understood.MethodsQuantitative BKV DNA surveillance in plasma/urine and cytological testing in urine were performed regularly within the first year post-transplantation in 229 kidney recipients. Patients with BK viremia and BKVAN treated with immunosuppression reduction were monitored for BKV every 3–6 months. All the patients were followed up for a minimum of 5 years to exclude later development of BKVAN. Potential variables were compared and analyzed using logistic regression model multivariate analysis to assess and rank the BKV infection-related factors.ResultsSeventy-eight (34.1%) patients had decoy cells, 99 (43.2%) BK viruria, 38 (16.6%) BK viremia, and 7 (3.1%) BKVAN. Risk for decoy cells, BK viruria, and viremia, and BKVAN in univariate analyses were higher with tacrolimus (Tac) and deceased kidney donation. Multivariate analysis showed that Tac ([HR, 2.7; P = .008], [HR, 2.3; P = .016], [HR, 2.9; P = .032]) and deceased kidney donation ([HR, 2.5; P = .004], [HR, 2.6; P = .002], [HR, 2.1; P = .071]) were risk factors for BK decoy cells, BK viruria, and viremia, respectively. BKVAN was inclined to the patients with the combination of Tac and mycophenolate mofetil and longer BKV clearance time.ConclusionsTac and deceased kidney donation are independent risk factors for BKV infection under the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring.     

Prospective study of polyomavirus BK replication and nephropathy in renal transplant recipients in China: a single‐center analysis of incidence,reduction in immunosuppression and clinical course

Huang G, Chen L‐Z, Qiu J, Wang C‐X, Fei J‐G, Deng S‐X, Li J, Chen G‐D, Zhang L, Fu Q, Zeng W‐T, Zhao D‐Q. Prospective study of polyomavirus BK replication and nephropathy in renal transplant recipients in China: a single‐center analysis of incidence, reduction in immunosuppression and clinical course.
Clin Transplant 2009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2009.01141.x
© 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: BK virus (BKV)‐associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in renal transplant recipients is an important cause of renal transplant dysfunction. Our aim was to determine the kinetics of BKV load within one yr after kidney transplantation under the impact of intensive monitoring and reduction in maintenance immunosuppression, the incidence of BKVAN, and the outcome of BKVAN treatment. Methods: Urine and peripheral blood (PB) were taken from 90 renal transplant recipients for BKV cytological testing and real‐time PCR for BKV DNA at one, three, six, nine, and 12 months after transplantation and treatment. Graft biopsies and urinary sediments of recipients with BKVAN were taken to monitor viral particles by conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: By one post‐transplant year, urinary decoy cells (median, 8/10 HPF), BKV viruria (median, 2.60 × 10⁵ copies/mL), viremia (median, 9.65 × 10³ copies/mL ) , and BKVAN occurred in 42.2%, 45.6%, 22.2%, and 5.6% of patients, respectively. The incidence of BK infection was lower in patients who received cyclosporine A (CsA) (28.9%) compared to tacrolimus (FK506) (57.7%) (p = 0.007). An increased hazard of BK infection was associated with the use of FK506 (HR 2.6, p = 0.009) relative to CsA. After reduction in immunosuppression, viremia resolved in 95%, without increased acute rejection, allograft dysfunction, or graft loss. BKVAN was diagnosed in five patients (5.6%). The treatment of immunosuppression reduction was effective (i.e., decreased the viral load and number of decoy cells, and improved graft function) in our five patients with BKVAN. Quantitative count of decoy cells (e.g., >10 per 10 HPF) as a marker of viremia and BKVAN had increased positive predictive values of 85.7% and 57.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Choice of FK506 as immunosuppressive agent is an independent risk factor affecting BKV infection. Monitoring and pre‐emptive of immunosuppression reduction were associated with resolution of viremia and showed effective in BKVAN recipients at the early stage without acute rejection or graft loss. Quantitative count of urine cytology is a very convenient, useful, and sensitive method for evaluating BKV infection in renal transplant recipients.     

Polyomavirus BK Replication Dynamics In Vivo and In Silico to Predict Cytopathology and Viral Clearance in Kidney Transplants

Fast BK virus (BKV) replication in renal tubular epithelial cells drives polyomavirus‐BK‐associated nephropathy (PVAN) to premature kidney transplant (KT) failure. BKV also replicates in urothelial cells, but remains asymptomatic in two‐thirds of affected KT patients. Comparing 518 day‐matched plasma‐urine samples from 223 KT patients, BKV loads were ～3000‐fold higher in urine than in plasma (p < 0.000001). Molecular and quantitative parameters indicated that >95% of urine BKV loads resulted from urothelial replication and <5% from tubular epithelial replication. Fast BKV replication dynamics in plasma and urine with half‐lives of <12 h accounted for daily urothelial and tubular epithelial cell loss of 4×10⁷ and 6×10⁷, respectively. BKV dynamics in both sites were only partly linked, with full and partial discordance in 36% and 32%, respectively. Viral expansion was best explained by models where BKV replication started in the kidney followed by urothelial amplification and tubular epithelial cell cross‐feeding reaching a dynamic equilibrium after ～10 weeks. Curtailing intrarenal replication by 50% was ineffective and >80% was required for clearing viremia within 7 weeks, but viruria persisted for >14 weeks. Reductions >90% cleared viremia and viruria by 3 and 10 weeks, respectively. The model was clinically validated in prospectively monitored KT patients supporting >80% curtailing for optimal interventions.     

Reactivation of BK Virus in the Early Period After Kidney Transplantation

Background

Typically, polyoma BK virus (BKV) remains latent in the urogenital tract after primary infection. Reactivation of BKV in recipients of kidney allografts can cause progressive graft dysfunction known as BK virus nephropathy (BKVN). The cornerstone of treatment for BKVN is prevention; therefore, it is important to detect BKV reactivation early and reduce immunosuppression. We sought to identify the BKV reactivation rate and associated factors in a prospective study.

Materials and Methods

We studied 37 consecutive unselected adult recipients who underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation in 2007 and completed at least 3 months of observation. Qualitative nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing was performed to detect BKV DNA in urine and plasma specimens.

Results

In all cases, BK viremia or viruria was not detected on the postoperative day or 2 weeks thereafter. At 3 months, BKV reactivation developed in 6 (16%) of 37 recipients. Simultaneous viremia and viruria were present on 5 patients and viremia only in 1 patient. Significant risk factors for BK viremia were body mass index >30 kg/m² (P = .02), retransplantation (P =.04), and use of tacrolimus (P = .02). Serum creatinine values at 3 months after transplantation were significantly higher among patients with active BKV infection (P = .008).

Conclusions

Early BKV reactivation is associated with worse graft function as early as 3 months after transplantation. Obesity, retransplantation, and use of tacrolimus were factors promoting early development of BKV viremia.     

Does JC polyomavirus cause nephropathy in renal transplant patients?

Introduction

BK polyomavirus (BKV) reactivation characterized by active viruria occurs in 23%-57% of renal allograft recipients and BKV-associated nephropathy in as many as 8% of renal allograft recipients. Only a few cases of nephritis have been attributed to JC polyomavirus (JCV) with limited information about JCV replication and its impact on graft function and survival of kidney transplant patients. We sought to determine the prevalence of BKV and JCV replication, the risk factors associated with viral reactivation, and their implications for the development of polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) among renal transplant patients.

Materials and Methods

The study included 186 kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted between 2005 and 2009 with a 1-year follow-up. If the urine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive, we performed a PCR on blood. If this was positive or renal dysfunction was present, we performed a renal biopsy.

Results

Viruria was positive in 72 cases (39%) and viremia in 12 (6.5%); including, 3 patients (1.6%) who developed PVN. In the patients with viruria, BKV was detected in 47% and JCV in 46%; both were detected in 7%, although the combination of viremia and nephropathy were caused by BKV in all cases.

Conclusion

In renal transplant patients, the incidence of BKV and JCV viruria was similar, although in our series the JCV serotype did not cause viremia or PVN. Our experience suggested that JCV did not have the ability to cause PVN.     

The status of BK polyomavirus replication in adult renal transplant recipients in northeastern Poland

Purpose

BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection and BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) are among the most important problems in renal transplantation. We aimed to determine the incidence of BK viruria, viremia, and BKVAN in renal transplant recipients in the northeastern part of Poland.

Methods

Urine and blood samples from 126 cadaveric renal transplant recipients were analyzed for BK viruria and viremia using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and the patients were followed prospectively. The diagnosis of BKVAN was established on the allograft biopsy.

Results

Based on the BKV DNA analysis, the patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 89; 70.6%) without viruria or viremia, group 2 (n = 24; 19.1%) with isolated viruria, and group 3 (n = 13; 10.3%) with both viruria and viremia. The presence of BK viremia negatively correlated with time after the transplantation. BK viruria was associated with mycophenolate mofetil daily dose. In group 3 there were four patients (3.2%) with high viremia (>10⁴ genome equivalents [gEq]/mL) and viruria (>10⁷ gEq/mL) loads. Only one patient from this group developed clinical symptoms and had BKVAN in allograft biopsy. In all four cases, the maintenance immunosuppression therapy was based on tacrolimus and steroids.

Conclusion

Prevalence of BKV infection in renal transplant recipients in the northeastern part of Poland is similar to that reported by studies from other countries. We confirm that BK viremia could be predicted by the presence of intense viruria. Time after transplantation and the type of immunosuppression strategy are the most important predictors of BK viremia and viruria in patients after renal transplantation.     

Adverse impact of pretransplant polyoma virus infection on renal allograft function

Background: BK polyoma virus (BKV) has emerged as an important cause of acute and chronic allograft injury in renal transplant recipients. Reactivation of latent infection requires reduction in cell‐mediated immunity. We hypothesized that BKV could get reactivated in the urinary tract of patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) and impact the allograft function after these individuals undergo transplantation. Methods: We prospectively examined the urine specimens of 68 ESRD patients and their donors for BKV inclusion containing decoy cells with Papanicoulau staining and immunohistochemistry. Polymerase chain reaction was carried out to confirm the presence of viral DNA. Urine examination was repeated 3–9 months after transplantation and during episodes of graft dysfunction. All graft dysfunction episodes were investigated by biopsy. BKV‐associated nephropathy was confirmed by immunoperoxidase staining. Graft loss and doubling of serum creatinine were the study end‐points. Results: Decoy cells were detected in 22 ESRD patients and four donors (P < 0.0001). All 22 continued decoy cell excretion after transplantation and two fresh excreters were noted. Patients exhibiting decoy cells had more frequent graft dysfunction episodes (67% vs 30%, P = 0.003) and higher serum creatinine value (P < 0.001). About 33% patients achieved the combined end‐points in the BK viruria group, compared with 11% in the non‐decoy cell excreters (P = 0.03). Histologically proved BKV nephropathy was noted in 7% cases; all decoy cell excreters. Conclusion: We conclude that reactivation of latent BKV infection can occur in ESRD and confers an increased risk of graft dysfunction after transplantation. The mechanism of graft dysfunction in decoy cell excreters who do not develop overt nephropathy needs more studies.     

Viremia Negativization After BK Virus Infection in Kidney Transplantation: A National Bicentric Study

BackgroundBK virus (BKV) infection represents a potentially dreadful complication after kidney transplantation (KT). When BK viremia is detected, the best therapeutic approach remains not entirely clarified. Critical elements of BK viremia treatment are immunosuppression minimization and introduction of drugs like leflunomide, everolimus, and fluoroquinolones. The study aimed to analyze the results of the BK viremia management in 2 collaborative Italian centers.MethodsTen patients undergoing KT in the 2 collaborative Italian centers of Sapienza University of Rome and University of L’Aquila from January 2013 to December 2017 and showing a post-KT diagnosis of BK viremia were retrospectively investigated.ResultsMean time from KT to BKV positivity was 7 months (range: 1-19 months). At diagnosis, the mean viral load was 683,842 copies/mL (range: 5800-4,052,415 copies/mL), with an average zenith of 2,428,410 copies/mL (range: 6762-18,022,500 copies/mL). In the 5 patients with BKV nephropathy, we observed a switch from antimetabolite to leflunomide (n = 5), a switch from tacrolimus to everolimus (n = 3), or an introduction of fluoroquinolones (n = 3). BKV clearance was achieved in 3 patients.ConclusionsEarly BKV diagnosis and stepwise minimization of immunosuppression remain the first-line approach in patients with BK viremia. In the presence of BKV nephropathy, a combination of antiviral drugs like leflunomide and fluoroquinolones/everolimus should favor viremia clearance.     

Pre‐transplant shedding of BK virus in urine is unrelated to post‐transplant viruria and viremia in kidney transplant recipients

BK virus‐(BKV) associated nephropathy (BKVN) is a major cause of allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients. In such patients, subclinical reactivation of latent BKV infection can occur in the pre‐transplant period. The purpose of this study was to determine whether urinary BKV shedding in the immediate pre‐transplant period is associated with a higher incidence of viruria and viremia during the first year after kidney transplantation. We examined urine samples from 34 kidney transplant recipients, using real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction to detect BKV. Urine samples were obtained in the immediate pre‐transplant period and during the first year after transplant on a monthly basis. If BKV viruria was detected, blood samples were collected and screened for BKV viremia. In the immediate pre‐transplant period, we detected BKV viruria in 11 (32.3%) of the 34 recipients. During the first year after transplantation, we detected BKV viruria in all 34 patients and viremia in eight (23.5%). We found no correlation between pre‐transplant viruria and post‐transplant viruria or viremia (p = 0.2). Although reactivation of latent BKV infection in the pre‐transplant period is fairly common among kidney transplant recipients, it is not a risk factor for post‐transplant BKV viruria or viremia.     

Incidence of BK with Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine and Impact of Preemptive Immunosuppression Reduction

Our purposes were to determine the incidence of BK viruria, viremia or nephropathy with tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine (CyA) and whether intensive monitoring and discontinuation of mycophenolate (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA), upon detection of BK viremia, could prevent BK nephropathy. We randomized 200 adult renal transplant recipients to FK506 (n = 134) or CyA (n = 66). Urine and blood were collected weekly for 16 weeks and at months 5, 6, 9 and 12 and analyzed for BK by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). By 1 year, 70 patients (35%) developed viruria and 23 (11.5%) viremia; neither were affected independently by FK506, CyA, MMF or AZA. Viruria was highest with FK506-MMF (46%) and lowest with CyA-MMF (13%), p = 0.005. Viruria >/= 9.5 log(10) copies/mL was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of viremia and a 13-fold increased risk of sustained viremia. After reduction of immunosuppression, viremia resolved in 95%, without increased acute rejection, allograft dysfunction or graft loss. No BK nephropathy was observed. Choice of calcineurin inhibitor or adjuvant immunosuppression, independently, did not affect BK viruria or viremia. Viruria was highest with FK506-MMF and lowest with CyA-MMF. Monitoring and preemptive withdrawal of immunosuppression were associated with resolution of viremia and absence of BK nephropathy without acute rejection or graft loss.     

肾移植术后多瘤病毒感染的临床诊断和治疗

目的 探讨肾移植术后多瘤病毒（BKV）感染的诊断方法、监测指标及初步治疗方法。方法 采集64例肾移植受者的血、尿样本，行BKV细胞学与聚合酶链反应（PCR）检测。对肾移植术后BKV感染的流行病学以及相关因素进行分析，并对BKV感染的受者进行试验性治疗。结果 64例受者的尿Decoy细胞、多瘤病毒尿症与多瘤病毒血症的阳性率分别为28．7％、17．2％和6．3％。血肌酐（Cr）升高的受者尿Decoy细胞阳性率高于血Cr稳定的受者（P=0．04）。受者的性别、年龄、诱导治疗方案、是否发生急性排斥反应以及术后肾功能恢复情况等临床因素与尿Decoy细胞、多瘤病毒尿症及多瘤病毒血症的出现无明显相关性。应用更昔洛韦试验性治疗4例BKV感染的受者，治疗2～3周后，受者的尿Decoy细胞以及血、尿BKV DNA均转为阴性。结论 血肌酐水平升高的肾移植受者易发生BKV再活化。可通过检测血BKV DNA筛查BKV相关的移植肾肾病。更昔洛韦治疗BKV具有良好的疗效，但需进一步验证。     

Polyoma virus BK and renal dysfunction in a transplanted population

INTRODUCTION: Reactivation of polyoma virus BK (BKV) is increasingly recognized as a cause of severe renal-allograft dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to evaluate prevalence of BKV infection and activity in a population of kidney (KT) and liver (LT) transplant patients and search for a possible correlation with renal dysfunction. METHODS: We studied 118 patients for BKV viruria and, when present, for BKV viremia. We also assessed HCV status. RESULTS: Among 16 patients with BKV viruria (5 LT and 11 KT), eight showed BKV viremia (one LT and seven KT). Among BKV viruria-positive patients, three LT recipients were HCV-positive. All LT BKV viruria-positive patients showed normal renal function with a mean serum creatinine (sCr) blood level of 0.9 mg% and a mean blood urea nitrogen (BUN) value of about 36 mg%. The mean transplant age was 2.5 years. In contrast, KT BKV viruria-positive patients showed impaired renal function which was slightly worse in patients who also displayed BKV viremia, namely, a mean sCr blood level 1.7 mg% and a mean BUN value about 80 mg%. The mean transplant age was 7 years. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, it seems that BKV viruria in renal allograft recipients may be associated with viremia and related to nephropathy that may lead to allograft rejection. The study will be completed with a 2-year follow-up of positive patients to assess the possible relationship between BKV active infection and eventual decrease of renal function and loss of transplanted organ.     

Association of DNA Amplification With Progress of BK Polyomavirus Infection and Nephropathy in Renal Transplant Recipients

Purpose

BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) is an important cause of renal allograft loss. Immunosuppression therapy in renal transplant recipients can lead to the reactivation of latent BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection, leading to BK viruria and viremia. This single-center study aimed to clarify the association between quantitative measurement of BKV DNA and the progression of BKV infection, and secondly to identify the risk factors associated with the evolution of viruria to viremia.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 266 patients who underwent renal transplantation in our center from October 2006 to February 2013. We examined the viral loads of BKV in urine and plasma by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay after screening all of the recipients by urinary sediment examination. BKVAN was diagnosed by histological examination with immunohistochemistry of the large T antigen in biopsy specimens.

Results

Overall, 22 recipients showed BK viruria alone, whereas 22 progressed to BK viremia, of which 6 patients were diagnosed with BKVAN. Among BKVAN patients, 2 cases progressed to graft loss at 59 months and 31 months after diagnosis, respectively. In BKVAN group, the plasma viral loads were significantly higher than those in viremia without nephropathy (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the evolution of viruria to viremia was associated with recipient age over 55 years (odds ratio, 32.08; 95% confidence interval, 2.1–489.5) and tacrolimus exposure (odds ratio, 11.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.34–107.04).

Conclusions

The progression from viremia to BKVAN was strongly associated with increasing plasma viral loads for BKV DNA. The cutoff value of 1 × 10⁴ copies/mL for plasma viral loads could differentiate between BKVAN and viremia alone. Further, recipient age over 55 years and tacrolimus exposure were independently associated with the evolution of viruria to viremia.     

Cost efficiency in the prospective diagnosis and follow-up of polyomavirus allograft nephropathy

Evaluation of urine cytology (UC) for decoy cells and quantitative determinations of viruria (urine viral load [UPCR])and viremia (viral load in blood [VLB]) have been proposed as surrogate markers of polyomavirus allograft nephropathy (PVAN). In this study, we present the experience with the concurrent evaluation of UC, UPCR, and VLB in 349 patients (940 sets of samples). Results were correlated with each other and with a previous, concurrent, or subsequent biopsy diagnosis of PVAN. Patients were followed up for a mean of 27 months posttransplantation. We conclude that both UC and UPCR are useful for screening of renal transplant recipients. Simultaneous performance of both UC and UPCR does not add useful clinical information. In patients with positive UC, performance of UPCR, however, can allow for the distinction between BK and JC polyoma viruses. Quantitative measurement of viremia is not indicated in patients lacking viruria because no patients with PVAN present with this combination of findings. In patients with viruria, a positive viremia strongly correlates with PVAN. Rationale selection of screening protocols based on the current knowledge of the infection and tailored to the available laboratory capabilities in each transplantation center can optimize the use of resources.