Phenomenology of children and adolescents with bipolar spectrum disorders

CONTEXT: Children and adolescents who present with manic symptoms frequently do not meet the full DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I disorder (BP-I). OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical presentation and family history of children and adolescents with BP-I, bipolar II disorder (BP-II), and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (BP-NOS). DESIGN: Subjects and their primary caretaker were assessed by semistructured interview, and family psychiatric history was obtained from interview of the primary caretaker. SETTING: Outpatient and inpatient units at 3 university centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 438 children and adolescents (mean +/- SD age, 12.7 +/- 3.2 years) with BP-I (n = 255), BP-II (n = 30), or BP-NOS (n = 153). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime psychiatric history and family history of psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Youth with BP-NOS were not diagnosed as having BP-I primarily because they did not meet the DSM-IV duration criteria for a manic or mixed episode. There were no significant differences among the BP-I and BP-NOS groups in age of onset, duration of illness, lifetime rates of comorbid diagnoses, suicidal ideation and major depression, family history, and the types of manic symptoms that were present during the most serious lifetime episode. Compared with youth with BP-NOS, subjects with BP-I had more severe manic symptoms, greater overall functional impairment, and higher rates of hospitalization, psychosis, and suicide attempts. Elevated mood was present in 81.9% of subjects with BP-NOS and 91.8% of subjects with BP-I. Subjects with BP-II had higher rates of comorbid anxiety disorders compared with the other 2 groups and had less functional impairment and lower rates of psychiatric hospitalization than the subjects with BP-I. CONCLUSIONS: Children and adolescents with BP-II and BP-NOS have a phenotype that is on a continuum with that of youth with BP-I. Elevated mood is a common feature of youth with BP-spectrum illness.     

Declarative memory impairment in pediatric bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES: Impaired verbal declarative memory has been proposed as a trait marker for adult bipolar disorder. However, similar impairments in juvenile-onset bipolar disorder have not been yet documented. Here, we assessed declarative memory in a large sample of clinically well-characterized children with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Forty-one children and adolescents with bipolar disorder [21 bipolar I disorder (BP-I), 10 bipolar II disorder (BP-II), and 10 bipolar disorder, not otherwise specified (BP-NOS)] and 17 demographically matched healthy participants completed a standardized learning and memory test. RESULTS: BP-I children recalled and recognized significantly fewer words than healthy subjects, whereas children with BP-II and BP-NOS did not differ from controls. However, individuals with BP-NOS made more perseverative errors and intrusions than the other groups. Severity of mood symptomatology was not associated with memory performance in any bipolar subtype. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that declarative memory impairments in juvenile BP-I are similar to those seen in the adult form of the illness. These impairments do not appear to be secondary to clinical state; rather, they may reflect trait-related impairments. Distinct performance patterns in BP-I, BP-II, and BP-NOS suggest that the broadly defined phenotype is significantly heterogeneous, and may not be informative for pathogenetic investigations of bipolar disorder.     

Psychosocial disability in the course of bipolar I and II disorders: a prospective, comparative, longitudinal study

CONTEXT: Evidence of psychosocial disability in bipolar disorder is based primarily on bipolar I disorder (BP-I) and does not relate disability to affective symptom severity and polarity or to bipolar II disorder (BP-II). OBJECTIVE: To provide detailed data on psychosocial disability in relation to symptom status during the long-term course of BP-I and BP-II. DESIGN: A naturalistic study with 20 years of prospective, systematic follow-up. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient treatment facilities at 5 US academic centers.Patients One hundred fifty-eight patients with BP-I and 133 patients with BP-II who were followed up for a mean (SD) of 15 (4.8) years in the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Depression Study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship, by random regression, between Range of Impaired Functioning Tool psychosocial impairment scores and affective symptom status in 1-month periods during the long-term course of illness from 6-month and yearly Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation interviews. RESULTS: Psychosocial impairment increases significantly with each increment in depressive symptom severity for BP-I and BP-II and with most increments in manic symptom severity for BP-I. Subsyndromal hypomanic symptoms are not disabling in BP-II, and they may even enhance functioning. Depressive symptoms are at least as disabling as manic or hypomanic symptoms at corresponding severity levels and, in some cases, significantly more so. At each level of depressive symptom severity, BP-I and BP-II are equally impairing. When asymptomatic, patients with bipolar disorder have good psychosocial functioning, although it is not as good as that of well controls. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial disability fluctuates in parallel with changes in affective symptom severity in BP-I and BP-II. Important findings for clinical management are the following: (1) depressive episodes and symptoms, which dominate the course of BP-I and BP-II, are equal to or more disabling than corresponding levels of manic or hypomanic symptoms; (2) subsyndromal depressive symptoms, but not subsyndromal manic or hypomanic symptoms, are associated with significant impairment; and (3) subsyndromal hypomanic symptoms appear to enhance functioning in BP-II.     

Rapid, continuous cycling and psychiatric co-morbidity in pediatric bipolar I disorder

Objectives: The primary purpose of this study was to describe the clinical presentation of bipolar I disorder (BP-I) as it occurs in children and adolescents and to assess whether the manifestations of BP-I were similar in both age groups.

Method: Ninety youths between the ages of 5 and 17 years meeting full diagnostic symptom criteria for BP-I were included in this study. The diagnosis of BP-I was established for these youths based on the results of a semi-structured diagnostic interview and a clinical assessment by a child and adolescent psychiatrist. The course of a subset of these youngsters' illnesses was assessed using the Life Charting Method (LCM). Data regarding the clinical presentation, longitudinal history, psychiatric co-morbidities and parental psychopathology were also obtained.

Results: The clinical presentation of BP-I was similar in children and adolescents. Youths meeting diagnostic criteria for BP-I developed an average of approximately 5.8 of the 7 symptoms of mania during periods of elevated or irritable mood. BP-I was found to be a cyclic disorder characterized by high rates of rapid cycling (50%) with almost no inter-episode recovery. Almost 75% of these subjects also met diagnostic symptom criteria for a disruptive behavior disorder. High rates of mood disorders were found in fathers.

Conclusions: These data suggest that the presentation of juvenile BP-I is a cyclic and valid clinical condition with manifestations on a continuum with the later-onset forms of this illness.     

Early symptoms of mania and the role of parental risk

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to: (i) describe the phenomenology of youths diagnosed with subsyndromal bipolar disorders; (ii) describe the phenomenology of youngsters who are the children of bipolar parents, who are also experiencing subsyndromal symptoms of bipolar disorder (patients with 'cyclotaxia'); and (iii) explore which symptoms may be most useful in identifying youths with cyclotaxia. METHODS: Four hundred outpatients between the ages of 5 and 17 years received a diagnostic assessment and psychometric questionnaires pertaining to mood symptomatology and psychosocial functioning. Parental diagnostic information was also obtained. Children and adolescents were assigned to one of three diagnostic groups: a 'syndromal bipolar disorder (BP)' group (n = 118), a 'sub-syndromal bipolar (SUB-BP)' group (n = 75), or a 'non-bipolar (NON-BP)' group (n = 207). In addition, based on parental diagnoses, youths were assigned to either a high genetic risk group (n = 167) or a low genetic risk group (n = 233). RESULTS: Youths with subsyndromal bipolar disorders were found to have intermediate degrees of manic symptoms than youths with bipolar disorder and youths without a bipolar diagnosis. Offspring of parents having a bipolar disorder were more likely to show symptoms of hypomania and mania than youths without a bipolar parent. Youths at genetic risk for developing a bipolar disorder were not found to be at higher risk for having a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder or a disruptive behavior disorder. Finally, results suggest that elevated mood with irritability and rapid mood fluctuations are the key distinguishing characteristics of 'cyclotaxia'. CONCLUSIONS: There exists a group of youngsters who are the offspring of a parent/parents with a bipolar disorder who do not suffer from BP 1 or BP 2, yet have elevated mood symptoms and psychosocial dysfunction. As a result of these observations, treatment studies are needed for youths with 'cyclotaxia'.     

The long-term natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar I disorder

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective natural history study of weekly symptomatic status of patients with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) during long-term follow-up. METHODS: Analyses are based on ongoing prospective follow-up of 146 patients with Research Diagnostic Criteria BP-I, who entered the National Institute of Mental Health (Bethesda, Md) Collaborative Depression Study from 1978 through 1981. Weekly affective symptom status ratings were analyzed by polarity and severity, ranging from asymptomatic, to subthreshold levels, to full-blown major depression and mania. Percentages of follow-up weeks at each level as well as number of shifts in symptom status and polarity during the entire follow-up period were examined. Finally, 2 new measures of chronicity were evaluated in relation to previously identified predictors of chronicity for BP-I. RESULTS: Patients with BP-I were symptomatically ill 47.3% of weeks throughout a mean of 12.8 years of follow-up. Depressive symptoms (31.9% of total follow-up weeks) predominated over manic/hypomanic symptoms (8.9% of weeks) or cycling/mixed symptoms (5.9% of weeks). Subsyndromal, minor depressive, and hypomanic symptoms combined were nearly 3 times more frequent than syndromal-level major depressive and manic symptoms (29.9% vs 11.2% of weeks, respectively). Patients with BP-I changed symptom status an average of 6 times per year and polarity more than 3 times per year. Longer intake episodes and those with depression-only or cycling polarity predicted greater chronicity during long-term follow-up, as did comorbid drug-use disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal weekly symptomatic course of BP-I is chronic. Overall, the symptomatic structure is primarily depressive rather than manic, and subsyndromal and minor affective symptoms predominate. Symptom severity levels fluctuate, often within the same patient over time. Bipolar I disorder is expressed as a dimensional illness featuring the full range (spectrum) of affective symptom severity and polarity.     

Clinical and demographic features of mood disorder subtypes

The aim of this study was to investigate demographic, clinical and symptomatologic features of the following mood disorder subtypes: bipolar disorder I (BP-I); bipolar disorder II (BP-II); major depressive disorder, recurrent (MDR); and major depressive episode, single episode (MDSE). A total of 1832 patients with mood disorders (BP-I=863, BP-II=141, MDR=708, and MDSE=120) were included in our study. The patients were assessed using structured diagnostic interviews and the operational criteria for psychotic illness checklist (n=885), the Hamilton depression rating scale (n=167), and the social adjustment scale (n=305). The BP-I patients were younger; had more hospital admissions; presented a more severe form of symptomatology in terms of psychotic symptoms, disorganization, and atypical features; and showed less insight into their disorder than patients in the other groups. Compared with the major depressive subgroups, BP-I patients were more likely to have an earlier age at onset, an earlier first lifetime psychiatric treatment, and a greater number of illness episodes. BP-II patients had a higher suicide risk than both BP-I and MDSE patients. MDSE patients presented less severe symptomatology, lower age at observation, and a higher number of males. The retrospective approach and the selection constraints due to the inclusion criteria are the main limitations of the study. Our data support the view that BP-I disorder is quite different from the remaining mood disorders from a demographic and clinical perspective, with BP-II disorder having an intermediate position to MDR and MDSE, that is, as a less severe disorder. This finding may help in the search for the biological basis of mood disorders.     

Prevalence, Clinical Presentation and Differential Diagnosis of Pediatric Bipolar Disorder

Background: Over the past 20 years, the evidence regarding pediatric bipolar disorder (BP) has increased substantially. As a result, recent concerns have focused primarily on prevalence and differential diagnosis. Method: Selective review of the literature. Results: BP as defined by rigorously applying diagnostic criteria has been observed among children and especially adolescents in numerous countries. In contrast to increasing diagnoses in clinical settings, prevalence in epidemiologic studies has not recently changed. BPspectrum conditions among youth are highly impairing and confer high risk for conversion to BP-I and BP-II. Compared to adults, youth with BP have more mixed symptoms, more changes in mood polarity, are more often symptomatic and seem to have worse prognosis. The course, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities of BP among children and adolescents are in many ways otherwise similar to those of adults with BP. Nonetheless, many youth with BP receive no treatment and most do not receive BP-specific treatment. Conclusion: Despite increased evidence supporting the validity of pediatric BP, discrepancies between clinical and epidemiologic findings suggest that diagnostic misapplication may be common. Simultaneously, low rates of treatment of youth with BP suggest that withholding of BP diagnoses may also be common. Clinicians should apply diagnostic criteria rigorously in order to optimize diagnostic accuracy and ensure appropriate treatment.     

A prospective investigation of the natural history of the long-term weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder

BACKGROUND: This is the first prospective longitudinal study, to our knowledge, of the natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder (BP-II). METHODS: Weekly affective symptom status ratings for 86 patients with BP-II were based on interviews conducted at 6- or 12-month intervals during a mean of 13.4 years of prospective follow-up. Percentage of weeks at each symptom severity level and the number of shifts in symptom status and polarity were examined. Predictors of chronicity for BP-II were evaluated using new chronicity measures. Chronicity was also analyzed in relation to the percentage of follow-up weeks with different types of somatic treatment. RESULTS: Patients with BP-II were symptomatic 53.9% of all follow-up weeks: depressive symptoms (50.3% of weeks) dominated the course over hypomanic (1.3% of weeks) and cycling/mixed (2.3% of weeks) symptoms. Subsyndromal, minor depressive, and hypomanic symptoms combined were 3 times more common than major depressive symptoms. Longer intake episodes, a family history of affective disorders, and poor previous social functioning predicted greater chronicity. Prescribed somatic treatment did not correlate significantly with symptom chronicity. Patients with BP-II of brief (2-6 days) vs longer (> or =7 days) hypomanias were not significantly different on any measure. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal symptomatic course of BP-II is chronic and is dominated by depressive rather than hypomanic or cycling/mixed symptoms. Symptom severity fluctuates frequently within the same patient over time, involving primarily symptoms of minor and subsyndromal severity. Longitudinally, BP-II is expressed as a dimensional illness involving the full severity range of depressive and hypomanic symptoms. Hypomania of long or short duration in BP-II seems to be part of the same disease process.     

Toward better probing for hypomania of bipolar-II disorder by using Angst's checklist

The reliability of the diagnosis of bipolar-II disorder (BP-II) is still a problem. Semi-structured interviews by clinicians might partly overcome this problem. The aims of this study were to find the degree of agreement in the diagnosis of BP-II between the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and a semi-structured interview based on Angst's hypomania checklist (Angst et al., 2003), and to assess the priority among hypomanic symptoms for the diagnosis of BP-II. Remitted depression outpatients (N = 102) were interviewed during a follow-up visit using th Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), and then with Angst's semi-structured interview, following DSMIV criteria. Bipolar I (BP-I) patients were excluded. Using the SCID, 29 patients were diagnosed BP-II, 26 BP-I, and 47 major depressive disorder (MDD). By the semi-structured interview 69 patients were diagnosed BP-II, 33 MDD, and none BP-I. Agreement for the diagnosis of BP-II between the two interviews was 53.9% (k = 0.18). Re-analysis, after deleting the SCID question on the impact on functioning (DSM-IV unclear boundary between BP-I and BP-II), increased agreement to 78.4% (k = 0.55). Elevated mood and overactivity (increased goal-directed activity) had th lowest agreement (k = 0.46 0.49). For predicting BP-II, overactivity had the highest sensitivity (94.2%), whil elevated mood had a sensitivity of 84.0%. Multivariate analysis for predicting BP-II (diagnosed by semi-structured interview), including all DSM-IV hypomanic symptoms, found that mood change and overactivity were the only independent predictors. Overactivity plus at least three symptoms (as suggested by Angst and Gamma, 2002) were present in 71 patients, of whom 91.5% also met DSM-IV criteria for hypomania. Overactivity and elevated mood were strongly associated (but not overactivity and irritability). Findings may support a diagnosis of BP-II based on Angst's semi-structured interview versus the fully structured SCID interview. While DSM-IV always requires mood change for the diagnosis of hypomania, the present findings may suggest that overactivity could have the same priority, as suggested by Angst et al. (2003) and by Akiskal et al. (1977, 2001, 2003).     

Is bipolar disorder specifically associated with aggression?

Ballester J, Goldstein T, Goldstein B, Obreja M, Axelson D, Monk K, Hickey MB, Iyengar S, Farchione T, Kupfer DJ, Brent D, Birmaher B. Is bipolar disorder specifically associated with aggression? Bipolar Disord 2012: 14: 283–290. © 2012 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objective: Several studies have suggested that bipolar disorder (BP) in adults is associated with aggressive behaviors. However, most studies have included only inpatients and have not taken into consideration possible confounding factors. The goal of the present study was to compare the prevalence of aggression in subjects with BP compared to subjects with other, non‐BP psychopathology and healthy controls. Methods: Subjects with bipolar I disorder (BP‐I) and bipolar II disorder (BP‐II) (n = 255), non‐BP psychopathology (n = 85), and healthy controls (n = 84) were recruited. Aggression was measured using the Aggression Questionnaire (AQ). Group comparisons were adjusted for demographic and clinical differences (e.g., comorbid disorders) and multiple comparisons. The effects of the subtype of BP, current versus past episode, polarity of current episode, psychosis, the presence of irritable mania/hypomania only, and pharmacological treatment were examined. Results: Subjects with BP showed significantly higher total and subscale AQ scores (raw and T‐scores) when compared to subjects with non‐BP psychopathology and healthy controls. Exclusion of subjects with current mood episodes and those with common comorbid disorders yielded similar results. There were no effects of BP subtype, polarity of the current episode, irritable manic/hypomanic episodes only, or current use of pharmacological treatments. Independent of the severity of BP and polarity of the episode, those in a current mood episode showed significantly higher AQ scores than those not in a current mood episode. Subjects with current psychosis showed significantly higher total AQ score, hostility, and anger than those without current psychosis. Conclusions: Subjects with BP display greater rates of anger and aggressive behaviors, especially during acute and psychotic episodes. Early identification and management of these behaviors is warranted.     

Prospective study of adolescents with subsyndromal psychosis: characteristics and outcome

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the characteristics and outcome of adolescents with psychotic disorder not otherwise specified (PsyNOS) and brief psychotic disorder (BrPsy), two neglected subsyndromal diagnostic entities. METHODS: As part of an ongoing, naturalistic study investigating adolescents considered to be prodromal for schizophrenia, 29 youngsters (mean age, 16.2 +/- 2.7 years) with PsyNOS or BrPsy were identified as theoretically at highest risk for schizophrenia and followed for over 6 (mean, 22.8 +/- 19.4) months. RESULTS: Contrary to our expectations, only 7 of the 26 individuals (27.0%) with follow-up data developed schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, and only 2 subjects (7.7%) retained their diagnosis of BrPsy/PsyNOS. The most frequent other diagnoses at follow-up were mood disorders (34.6%), personality disorders (11.5%), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (7.7%). Regarding severity of outcome, 38.5% of the patients progressed to a syndromal psychotic disorder, 23.1% continued to have attenuated positive symptoms, and 38.4% improved to having attenuated negative symptoms only, or no positive or negative symptoms. BrPsy was associated with lower maximum levels of negative symptoms (p = 0.02) and higher likelihood of symptom remission (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that psychotic symptoms not fulfilling criteria for schizophrenia or a psychotic mood disorder are unreliable predictors of a syndromal psychotic disorder outcome at 2 years. Long-term studies of PsyNOS and BrPsy are needed to clarify where these disorders fall in the developmental course of schizophrenia.     

Depressive symptoms predict slow cognitive decline in mild dementia

Depression may be a prognostic marker of subsequent cognitive decline in patients with dementia. Earlier investigations did not find support for this hypothesis, but these considered mainly syndromal depression. In this prospective study, 32 subjects with mild dementia were followed up for 12 months. The effects of GMS-AGECAT syndromal depression, subsyndromal depression and dimensions of depressive symptoms were studied. Higher levels of mood symptoms but not (sub)syndromal depression predicted slower cognitive decline during follow-up. It is hypothesized that the report of depressive symptoms by subjects with mild dementia reflects relative intactness of cognitive functions, not accounted for by cognitive screening instruments.     

Subsyndromal symptoms assessed in longitudinal, prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with bipolar disorder

Background: Many patients with bipolar disorder (BD) do not regain full function following an acute illness episode, but the extent to which this impairment is the result of persistent symptoms has not been well established. This study examined factors associated with persistent subsyndromal symptoms in a well characterized group of BD patients who were prospectively followed for an average of 3 years.
Methods: Detailed life charting data from 138 patients with BD were reviewed. Patients were categorized into euthymic, subsyndromal or syndromal groups according to the clinical state during their most recent year of follow-up. The three groups were then examined with respect to comorbidity, function and treatment received.
Results: Patients with subsyndromal symptoms had high rates of comorbid anxiety disorders, and were more likely to have increased rates of eating disorders as well. Patients with subsyndromal symptoms had lower global assessment of function (GAF) scores than euthymic patients, and had as many clinic contacts and medication trials as patients with full episodes of illness.
Conclusions: Persistent subsyndromal symptoms in BD patients are associated with high rates of comorbidity that is important to recognize and treat in order to optimize mood and functioning.     

Evidence-based definitions of bipolar-I and bipolar-II disorders among 5,635 patients with major depressive episodes in the Bridge Study: validity and comorbidity

The definitions of bipolar-I (BP-I) and bipolar-II (BP-II) disorders are currently under revision by the APA and by the WHO. We provide evidence of a revised set of criteria for bipolar disorders and major depressive disorder (MDD) which could serve to strengthen the construct and predictive validity of both disorders and enable more incisive studies of treatments and courses of both disorders. In the diagnostic Bridge Study of 5,635 patients with major depressive episodes from 18 countries (Europe, North Africa, Near East and Far East) leading psychiatrists in each country assessed a pre-specified group of symptoms, illness course, family history and duration of episodes; these data allowed tests of several definitions of bipolarity. The primary revised specifier diagnosis of BP-I disorder included manic episodes based on an additional category A criterion (increased activity/energy) and did not apply any exclusion criteria. The revised BP-II disorders included hypomanic episodes of 1–3 days. Family history and illness course validators (history of mania/hypomania among first degree relatives, 2 or more lifetime episodes and first symptoms having occurred before age 30) discriminated clearly between patients with bipolar-I or bipolar-II disorders meeting bipolarity specifier criteria and those with MDD. Specifier definitions provided better discrimination between MDD and the two bipolar subgroups. Patterns of concurrent comorbidities also differed significantly between patients meeting criteria for MDD compared with those meeting bipolar specifier criteria. Comorbidity patterns differed between bipolar-I and bipolar-II patients. This study provides evidence for the validity of modified (specifier) BP-I and BP-II definitions that incorporate illness course and family history which reduce ambiguities of major depressive episodes between bipolar-I and bipolar-II disorders and MDD.     

Is overactivity the core feature of hypomania in bipolar II disorder?

BACKGROUND: Recent studies found that overactivity (increased goal-directed activities) may be as important as mood change (elevated and/or irritable mood) for the diagnosis of mania/hypomania (on family history and psychometric grounds), questioning DSM-IV-TR criteria always requiring mood change and listing overactivity among the other symptoms. The aim of the study was to find out if overactivity was at least as important as mood change for the diagnosis of hypomania. SAMPLING AND METHODS: A consecutive sample of 137 bipolar II disorder (BP-II) and 76 major depressive disorder remitted outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV by a senior clinical and research psychiatrist in a private practice. Patients were asked if they had had hypomanic symptoms and episodes, and which were the most common hypomanic symptoms during the various episodes. The study aim had not been planned when variables were collected for different study goals. RESULTS: Overactivity was the most common hypomanic symptom in BP-II, more common than elevated mood, and had the strongest association with BP-II among all the hypomanic symptoms (overactivity odds ratio = 15.4, elevated mood odds ratio = 12.6). Three factors were found: an 'elevated mood' factor including elevated mood and increased self-esteem; a 'mental activation' factor including racing/crowded thoughts, and a 'behavioral activation' factor including overactivity. There was no relationship between overactivity and mood change. Irritable mood was not associated with overactivity and elevated mood. BP-II was present in 21.6%of patients without a history of overactivity, and in 81.0% of patients with a history of overactivity. BP-II was present in 25.0% of patients without elevated mood, and in 63.3% of patients with elevated mood. As a predictor of BP-II, overactivity had a sensitivity of 90.5%, a specificity of 61.8%, and a positive predictive value of 81.0% (elevated mood: 72.2, 82.8, and 88.3%, respectively). Five or more hypomanic symptoms had the most balanced combination of sensitivity (82.4%) and specificity (85.5%) for BP-II, and a positive predictive value of 91.1%. Overactivity was present in 89.5% of patients with a history of > or = 5 hypomanic symptoms, while elevated mood was present in 76.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Theresults seem to support the view that overactivity may be a core feature of hypomania, suggesting the upgrading of overactivity to a stem criterion for hypomania.     

Symptom profile consistency in recurrent manic episodes

Few studies have addressed whether symptom profiles remain consistent between episodes of mania. Those that have done so focused on mood only and adopted the strictly categorical approach. We evaluated 77 subjects during two discrete manic episodes (mean interval, 2 years, 2 weeks). Episodes were characterized on five established symptom factors of mania and on overall severity of classic manic symptoms (i.e., excluding dysphoric symptoms). Pearson correlation coefficients were computed to compare symptom profiles across episodes. Four symptom factors (dysphoria, hedonic activation, psychosis, and irritable aggression) were significantly correlated across episodes, as was manic severity. Psychomotor symptoms were not significantly correlated. Manic symptomatology remains generally similar in bipolar subjects during different episodes. The characterization of manic episodes by the empirical dimensions of symptom factors, as suggested by Kraepelin nearly a century ago, may provide additional information for biological and treatment response studies of manic states that is not captured by categorical subtype diagnosis focused solely on mood symptoms (i.e., mixed v pure manic episodes).     

Psychotic phenomena in 257 young children and adolescents with bipolar I disorder: delusions and hallucinations (benign and pathological)

OBJECTIVES: In contrast to studies of adult bipolar I disorder (BP-I), there is a paucity of data on psychotic phenomena in child BP-I. Therefore, the aim of this work was to describe delusions and hallucinations in pediatric BP-I. METHODS: Subjects were 257 participants, aged 6-16, in either of two large, ongoing, NIMH-funded studies, 'Phenomenology and Course of Pediatric Bipolar Disorders' or 'Treatment of Early Age Mania (TEAM)'. All subjects had current DSM-IV BP-I (manic or mixed phase) with a Children's Global Assessment Scale score 相似文献   

Impact of temperamental mood lability on depressive mixed state

BACKGROUND: Cyclothymic temperament (which includes mood lability) is common in bipolar II disorder (BP-II). Depressive mixed state (DMX), a major depressive episode (MDE) mixed with intra-episode hypomanic symptoms (3 or more, according to a recently validated definition), was found to be common in BP-II and not uncommon in major depressive disorder (MDD). The study aim was to find the impact of temperamental mood lability (TML) on DMX. METHODS: Consecutive 148 BP-II and 117 MDD outpatients presenting for MDE treatment were interviewed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV as modified by Benazzi and Akiskal to reduce the false negative BP-II. Intra-MDE hypomanic symptoms were systematically assessed. Kraepelin, Angst, and Akiskal's definitions of temperamental mood lability (i.e., frequent up and down fluctuations of mood between major mood episodes since young age) were followed. RESULTS: DMX was present in 61.5%, TML in 52.8%. In the DMX sample, TML was present in 57.6%, and in the non-DMX sample TML was present in 45.0% (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.0-2.7). In the DMX sample, independent predictors of DMX with TML were BP-II and young age at onset. Intra-MDE hypomanic symptoms, and MDE, melancholic and atypical symptoms were not significantly different between DMX patients with TML and DMX patients without TML, apart from more temperamental interpersonal sensitivity in DMX patients with TML (OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.0-3.8). DISCUSSION: DMX patients with TML had a younger onset age, suggesting that TML may facilitate the onset of DMX or that it may be a precursor of DMX. The association of BP-II with DMX, TML, and interpersonal sensitivity can make the course of BP-II more unstable and its treatment more complex.