Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) with reference to invasive coronary angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) on a per-patient as well as on a per-segment basis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with known or suspected CAD underwent both DSCT (Somatom Definition, Siemens Medical Solutions) and quantitative x-ray coronary angiography (QCA). Parameters of CT acquisition were gantry rotation time 0.330 seconds (ie, temporal resolution 83 milliseconds), tube voltage 120 kV, tube current 560 mA with ECG-triggered tube current modulation and full current at 70% of the cardiac cycle for heart rates below 70 beats per minute or full current between 30% and 80% for higher and arrhythmic heart rates. The pitch was also adapted to the heart rate, ranging from 0.2 to 0.43. Volume and flow rate of contrast material (Ultravist 370, Schering AG) were adapted to the patient's body weight. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of DSCT in the detection or exclusion of significant CAD (ie, stenoses >50%) were evaluated on a per-patient and per-segment basis. RESULTS: All 35 CT angiograms were of diagnostic image quality. QCA demonstrated significant CAD in 48% (n = 17) and nonsignificant disease or normal coronary angiograms in 52% (n = 18) of the patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of DSCT on a per-patient basis were 100%, 89%, 89%, and 100%, respectively. On a per-segment basis, 473 of 481 coronary artery segments were assessable (98%). QCA demonstrated stenoses >50% in 32 segments (7%), and no disease or nonsignificant disease in 433 segments (93%). For the detection of stenoses >50% on a per-segment basis, DSCT showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 88%, 98%, 78%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of coronary DSCT with QCA shows a very robust image quality and a high diagnostic accuracy in a patient-based as well as a per-segment analysis. Maximal sensitivity and NPV in the per-patient analysis show the strength of the technique in ruling out significant CAD.     

Rationale and design of the ViCTORY (Validation of an Intracycle CT Motion CORrection Algorithm for Diagnostic AccuracY) trial

BackgroundCoronary CT angiography (CTA) has emerged as an effective noninvasive method for direct visualization of the coronary arteries, with high diagnostic performance compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, coronary CTA is prone to artifacts, including coronary motion, which may reduce its diagnostic performance. Intracycle motion compensation algorithms (MCAs) from a combination of software and hardware techniques now allow for correction of coronary motion, but the diagnostic performance of MCAs compared with traditional coronary CTA reconstruction methods remains unexplored.MethodsViCTORY (Validation of an Intracycle CT Motion CORrection Algorithm for Diagnostic AccuracY) is a prospective international multicenter trial of 218 patients which is designed to evaluate the performance of MCAs for the diagnosis of anatomically obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with an ICA reference standard, on a per-patient, per-vessel, and per-segment basis. Patients enrolled into ViCTORY will undergo investigational coronary CTA and clinically indicated ICA and will not receive heart rate-lowering medications before coronary CTA. Coronary CTA images will be reconstructed by conventional standard methods as well as by MCAs. Blinded core laboratory interpretation will be performed for coronary CTA and ICA in an intent-to-diagnose fashion.ResultsThe primary end point of ViCTORY is the per-patient diagnostic accuracy of MCAs for the diagnosis of anatomically obstructive CAD compared with ICA. Secondary end points will include other per-patient, per-vessel, and per-segment diagnostic performance characteristics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Other key secondary end points will include diagnostic interpretability, image quality, the upper heart rate threshold of utility of MCAs, and the additive value of MCAs to traditionally reconstructed coronary CTA.ConclusionViCTORY will determine whether MCAs improve the diagnosis of obstructive CAD in patients undergoing coronary CTA who are not receiving heart rate-lowering medications.     

Forty-slice spiral computed tomography of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and diagnostic accuracy in a non-selected patient population

PURPOSE: To investigate prospectively the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 40-slice computed tomography (CT) for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in a non-selected, consecutive patient cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (28 men, 12 women) underwent both 40-slice CT and conventional invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 10+/-7 days. The results of both methods were compared on a per-segment and per-patient basis, using ICA as the standard of reference. RESULTS: According to ICA, significant CAD was present in 30/40 patients (75%). Of a total of 545 segments, 43 segments (7.9%) could not be sufficiently evaluated by CT due to motion artifacts in 15 segments (34.9%), small vessel size and suboptimal contrast enhancement in 14 segments (32.6%), severe calcification in 10 segments (23.3%), and opacified adjacent structures such as cardiac veins in four segments (9.3%). Segment-based analysis for detection of significant stenosis >50% yielded an overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 87%, 99%, 98%, and 95%, respectively. Restricting the assessment to clinically relevant proximal coronary segments led to an increase in sensitivity to 96%, specificity to 99%, and negative predictive value to 99%. Patient-based analysis demonstrated a high negative predictive value (91%) of CT for excluding significant CAD, even when all segments were included in the analysis. CONCLUSION: In a non-selected patient population with a high prevalence of CAD, 40-slice CT demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in the assessment of significant CAD per patient and per segment.     

The accuracy of coronary CT angiography in patients with coronary calcium score above 1000 Agatston Units: Comparison with quantitative coronary angiography

BackgroundHigh amounts of coronary artery calcium (CAC) pose challenges in interpretation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA). The accuracy of stenosis assessment by CCTA in patients with very extensive CAC is uncertain.MethodsRetrospective study was performed including patients who underwent clinically directed CCTA with CAC score >1000 and invasive coronary angiography within 90 days. Segmental stenosis on CCTA was graded by visual inspection with two-observer consensus using categories of 0%, 1–24%, 25–49%, 50–69%, 70–99%, 100% stenosis, or uninterpretable. Blinded quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed on all segments with stenosis ≥25% by CCTA. The primary outcome was vessel-based agreement between CCTA and QCA, using significant stenosis defined by diameter stenosis ≥70%. Secondary analyses on a per-patient basis and inclusive of uninterpretable segments were performed.Results726 segments with stenosis ≥25% in 346 vessels within 119 patients were analyzed. Median coronary calcium score was 1616 (1221–2118). CCTA identification of QCA-based stenosis resulted in a per-vessel sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 75%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 93%, and accuracy 76% (68 false positive and 15 false negative). Per-patient analysis had sensitivity 94%, specificity 55%, PPV 63%, NPV 92%, and accuracy 72% (30 false-positive and 3 false-negative). Inclusion of uninterpretable segments had variable effect on sensitivity and specificity, depending on whether they are considered as significant or non-significant stenosis.ConclusionsIn patients with very extensive CAC (>1000 Agatston units), CCTA retained a negative predictive value ​> ​90% to identify lack of significant stenosis on a per-vessel and per-patient level, but frequently overestimated stenosis.     

Coronary calcium score as gatekeeper for 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain: per-segment and per-patient analysis

We sought to investigate the performance of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients with different coronary calcium scores. Two hundred patients undergoing 64-slice CT coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease were enrolled into five groups based on Agatston calcium score using the Mayo Clinic risk stratification: group 1: score 0, group 2: score 1–10, group 3: score 11–100, group 4: score 101–400, and group 5: score > 401. Diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant (≥50% lumen reduction) coronary artery stenosis was assessed on a per-segment and per-patient base using quantitative coronary angiography as the gold standard. For groups 1 through 5, sensitivity was 97, 96, 91, 90, 92%, and specificity was 99, 98, 96, 88, 90%, respectively, on a per-segment basis. On a per-patient basis, the best diagnostic performance was obtained in group 1 (sensitivity 100% and specificity 100%) and group 5 (sensitivity 95% and specificity 100%). Progressively higher coronary calcium levels affect diagnostic accuracy of CT coronary angiography, decreasing sensitivity and specificity on a per-segment base. On a per-patient base, the best results in terms of diagnostic accuracy were obtained in the populations with very low and very high cardiovascular risk. Authors have no financial conflict of interest. Neither this paper nor any of its content has not been submitted to other journals.     

Multicenter Evaluation of Coronary Dual-Source CT Angiography in Patients with Intermediate Risk of Coronary Artery Stenoses (MEDIC): Study design and rationale

BackgroundThe diagnostic performance of multidetector row CT to detect coronary artery stenosis has been evaluated in numerous single-center studies, with only limited data from large cohorts with low-to-intermediate likelihood of coronary disease and in multicenter trials. The Multicenter Evaluation of Coronary Dual-Source CT Angiography in Patients with Intermediate Risk of Coronary Artery Stenoses (MEDIC) trial determines the accuracy of dual-source CT (DSCT) to identify persons with at least 1 coronary artery stenosis among patients with low-to-intermediate pretest likelihood of disease.MethodsThe MEDIC trial was designed as a prospective, multicenter, international trial to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DSCT for the detection of coronary artery stenosis compared with invasive coronary angiography. The study includes 8 sites in Germany, India, Mexico, the United States, and Denmark. The study population comprises patients referred for a diagnostic coronary angiogram because of suspected coronary artery disease with an intermediate pretest likelihood as determined by sex, age, and symptoms. All evaluations are performed by blinded core laboratory readers.ResultsThe primary outcome of the MEDIC trial is the accuracy of DSCT to identify the presence of coronary artery stenoses with a luminal diameter narrowing of 50% or more on a per-vessel basis. Secondary outcome parameters include per-patient and per-segment diagnostic accuracy for 50% stenoses and accuracy to identify stenoses of 70% or more. Furthermore, secondary outcome parameters include the influence of heart rate, Agatston score, body weight, body mass index, image quality, and diagnostic confidence on the accuracy to detect coronary artery stenoses >50% on a per-vessel basis.ConclusionThe results of the MEDIC trial will assess the clinical utility of coronary CT angiography in the evaluation of patients with intermediate pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease.     

The Diagnostic Accuracy, Image Quality and Radiation Dose of 64-Slice Dual-Source CT in Daily Practice: a Single Institution's Experience

Objective

We wanted to evaluate the image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure of 64-slice dual-source CT (DSCT) coronary angiography according to the heart rate in symptomatic patients during daily clinical practice.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective search for the DSCT coronary angiography reports of 729 consecutive symptomatic patients. For the 131 patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography, the image quality, the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV] and negative predictive value [NPV] for detecting significant stenosis ≥ 50% diameter) and the radiation exposure were evaluated. These values were compared between the groups with differing heart rates (HR): mean HR < 65 or ≥ 65 and HR variability (HRV) < 15 or ≥ 15.

Results

Among the 729 patients, the CT reports showed no stenosis or insignificant coronary artery stenosis in 72%, significant stenosis in 26% and non-diagnostic in 2%. For the 131 patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography, 95% of the patients and 97% of the segments were evaluable, and the overall per-patient/per-segment sensitivity, the perpatient/per-segment specificity, the per-patient/per-segment PPV and the per-patient/per-segment NPV were 100%/90%, 71%/98%, 95%/88% and 100%/97%, respectively. The image quality was better in the HR < 65 group than in the HR ≥ 65 group (p = 0.001), but there was no difference in diagnostic performance between the two groups. The mean effective radiation doses were lower in the HR < 65 or HRV < 15 group (p < 0.0001): 5.5 versus 6.7 mSv for the mean HR groups and 5.3 versus 9.3 mSv for the HRV groups.

Conclusion

Dual-source CT coronary angiography is a highly accurate modality in the clinical setting. Better image quality and a significant radiation reduction are being rendered in the lower HR group.     

Extent and severity of coronary artery disease by coronary CT angiography is associated with elevated left ventricular diastolic pressures and worsening diastolic function

BackgroundPatients with flow-limiting coronary stenoses exhibit elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and abnormal left ventricular (LV) relaxation.ObjectiveWe investigated the relationship of extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) by coronary CT angiography (CTA) to LVEDP and measures of LV diastolic dysfunction.MethodsWe identified consecutive patients undergoing coronary CTA and transthoracic echocardiography who were assessed for diastolic function. CAD was evaluated on a per-patient, per-vessel, and per-segment basis for intraluminal diameter stenosis by using an 18-segment model (0 = none, 1 = 1%–49%, 2 = 50%–69%, and 3 = 70%–100%) and summed over segments to obtain overall coronary plaque burden (segment stenosis score [SSS]; maximum = 54). Transthoracic echocardiography evaluated mitral inflow E wave-to-A wave ratio, tissue Doppler early mitral annual tissue velocity axial excursion, stage of diastolic dysfunction, and LV dimensions and estimated LVEDP from the ratio of mitral inflow velocity to early mitral annular (medial) tissue velocity.ResultsFour hundred seventy-eight patients (57% women; mean age, 57.9 ± 14.6 years; 24.9% prior CAD) comprised the study population. Increasing per-patient maximal coronary stenosis, number of vessels with obstructive stenosis, and SSS were associated with increased LVEDP. The prevalence of advanced diastolic dysfunction increased with greater number of obstructive vessels. In multivariable analyses, SSS was associated with increased LVEDP (0.8 mm Hg per tertile increase in SSS, 0.5–1.1; P < .001); reduced E′ axial excursion (?0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], ?0.5 to ?0.1; P = .001), increased LV mass index (1.6 g/m² per tertile increase in SSS; P = .04), and increased relative wall thickness (0.005; 95% CI, 0.004–0.009; P = .03), with consistent relationships persisting even among persons with per-patient maximal stenosis <50% and LV ejection fraction ≥55%.ConclusionsExtent and severity of obstructive as well as nonobstructive CAD by coronary CTA are associated with increased LVEDP and measures of diastolic dysfunction.     

平均心率、心率变异性和钙化负荷对双源CT冠状动脉成像诊断准确性的影响

目的 与常规冠状动脉造影(CAG)对照,评价双源CT冠状动脉血管成像(CTCA)诊断冠状动脉狭窄性病变的准确性以及平均心率、心率变异性和钙化负荷对CTCA诊断准确性的影响.资料与方法 2006年12月至2008年9月,113例患者同时进行了CTCA与CAG.以CAG为参照,评价CTCA诊断≥50%和>75%冠状动脉狭窄性病变的准确性.按心率、心率变异性和钙化积分将患者分组,评价不同亚组CTCA的诊断准确性,对敏感性和特异性数据进行χ~2检验.结果 以患者为分析单位,CTCA诊断≥50%和>75%冠状动脉狭窄性病变的敏感性和特异性分别为94%、93.3%;88.5%、96.2%;以血管为分析单位,CTCA诊断≥50%和>75%冠状动脉狭窄性病变的敏感性和特异性分别为90.0%、98.0%;84.8%、98.5%;而以节段为分析单位,CTCA诊断≥50%和>75%冠状动脉狭窄性病变的敏感性和特异性分别为89.9%、99.5%;83.0%、99.7%.平均心率对CTCA诊断冠状动脉狭窄无明显影响,而心率变异性和钙化积分对CTCA诊断冠状动脉狭窄有影响.结论 无论是以患者、血管还是节段为分析单位,CTCA在诊断冠状动脉狭窄方面均有较高的敏感性和特异性,平均心率对CTCA诊断冠状动脉狭窄的准确性无明显影响,而心率变异性和钙化积分对CTCA诊断冠状动脉狭窄的准确性有影响.     

基于人工智能的冠状动脉CT血管成像检测阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄效能的研究

目的 以有创冠状动脉造影（ICA）为参考标准,探讨人工智能(AI)辅助的冠状动脉CT血管成像（CCTA）诊断阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄的效能。 方法 回顾性收集行CCTA检查并于3个月内行ICA检查的50例疑患冠状动脉疾病（CAD）的病人,男34例,女16例,平均年龄（61.8±8.5）岁。AI软件、不同年资医师（低/中/高年资）及AI+不同年资医师分别对入组病人CCTA影像进行后处理并解读。将ICA和CCTA上冠状动脉管腔狭窄≥50%定义为阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄。采用Agatston积分法测量病人的钙化积分值,并将病人分为低钙化组（钙化积分<100）和高钙化组（钙化积分≥100）。采用独立样本t检验对AI、医师及AI+医师的图像后处理和解读时间进行两两比较。以ICA为参考标准,分析AI在不同研究水平和高/低钙化组的诊断价值,并比较AI、不同年资医师和AI+不同年资医师的诊断敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确度及受试者操作特征（ROC）曲线下面积（AUC）。采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确概率检验比较组间差异,采用DeLong检验比较AUC。 结果 50例病人共分析195支血管424个节段。AI和AI+医师的平均后处理和解读时间均低于单独医师诊断的时间（均P<0.05）,AI的时间较低/中/高年资医师分别减少了80%、76.8%和75%;AI+低/中/高年资医师较单独医师分别减少了67%、64%、57.9%。在病人、血管及节段水平,AI诊断阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄的敏感度分别为93.7%、83.1%、67.7%,特异度为50.0%、89.0%、91.0%,准确度为92%、86.7%、85.6%,阳性预测值为97.8%、83.1%、69.8%,阴性预测值为25%、89.0%、90.2%,AUC为0.87、0.89、0.83;在血管及节段水平,AI对低钙化组的特异度高于高钙化组（均P<0.05）。在血管水平,AI诊断的AUC值均低于中/高年资医师（均P<0.05）;其余研究水平,AI与其他不同年资医师诊断的AUC值差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。3种研究水平下,AI+低/中/高年资医师诊断的AUC值与单独不同年资医师诊断的AUC值差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。 结论 AI辅助的CCTA诊断阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄具有较好的诊断效能,且明显缩短后处理时间,可能成为临床医师诊断阻塞性冠状动脉狭窄的有效辅助工具。     

Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery geometry using coronary CTA

AimTo assess the association of coronary artery geometry with the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).Methods73 asymptomatic individuals at increased risk of CAD due to peripheral vascular disease (18 women, mean age 63.5 ± 8.2 years) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) using first generation dual-source CT. Curvature and tortuosity of the coronary arteries were quantified using semi-automatically generated centerlines. Measurements were performed for individual segments and for the entire artery. Coronary segments were labeled according to the presence of significant stenosis, defined as >70% luminal narrowing, and the presence of plaque. Comparisons were made by segment and by artery, using linear mixed models.ResultsOverall, median curvature and tortuosity were, respectively, 0.094 [0.071; 0.120] and 1.080 [1.040; 1.120] on a per-segment level, and 0.096 [0.078; 0.118] and 1.175 [1.090; 1.420] on a per-artery level. Curvature was associated with significant stenosis at a per-segment (p < 0.001) and per-artery level (p = 0.002). Curvature was 16.7% higher for segments with stenosis, and 13.8% higher for arteries with stenosis. Tortuosity was associated with significant stenosis only at the per-segment level (p = 0.002). Curvature was related to the presence of plaque at the per-segment (p < 0.001) and per-artery level (p < 0.001), tortuosity was only related to plaque at the per-segment level (p < 0.001).ConclusionCoronary artery geometry as derived from coronary CTA is related to the presence of plaque and significant stenosis.     

Relationship between CT coronary angiography and stress perfusion imaging in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease assessed by integrated PET-CT imaging

Background Although computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography (CTA) provides detailed assessments of the anatomic extent of coronary artery disease (CAD), its value for predicting myocardial ischemia is unclear. We examined the value of CTA to identify the presence of ischemia, as determined by stress perfusion imaging, using integrated positron emission tomography (PET)-CT imaging. Methods and Results We studied 110 consecutive patients (median age, 57 years; 55% male) with suspected CAD undergoing stress rubidium 82 myocardial perfusion PET imaging and CTA in the same setting. Increasing degrees of CTA-detected luminal narrowing (<50%, 50%–70%, and >70%) were associated with reduced sensitivity with commensurate improvements in specificity for identifying myocardial ischemia both on a per-vessel basis and on a per-patient basis. Consequently, with increasing degrees of CTA-detected stenosis severity, the positive predictive value increased (14%, 26%, and 53%, respectively, on a per-vessel basis [P<.001] and 29%, 44%, and 77%, respectively, on a per-patient basis [P=.005]), whereas the negative predictive value was unchanged (97%, 97%, and 96%, respectively, on a per-vessel basis [P=not significant (NS)] and 92%, 91%, and 88%, respectively, on a per-patient basis [P=NS]). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed no differences between these 3 anatomic criteria (receiver operating characteristic areas of 0.66±0., 0.73±0.06, and 0.71±0., respectively [P=NS]) for identifying ischemia. Nearly half of significant angiographic stenoses (47%) occurred without evidence of myocardial ischemia, whereas 50% of normal PET studies were associated with some CTA abnormality. Conclusions Despite an excellent negative predictive value, CTA is a poor discriminator of patients with myocardial ischemia. Conversely, a normal stress PET study is a poor discriminator of patients without evidence of non—flow-limiting (subclinical) coronary atherosclerosis. These results suggest potentially complementary roles of CT and perfusion imaging in the evaluation of patients with suspected CAD.     

Coronary CT angiography with dual source computed tomography in 170 patients

Introduction

In preliminary studies DSCT provides robust image quality over a wide range of heart rates and excludes CAD with high accuracy.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of these results in a large, unselected and consecutive group of patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

Material and methods

170 patients (124 men, 46 women; mean age: 64 ± 9 years) with known CAD (101 patients) or suspected CAD (69 patients) scheduled for ICA were examined by coronary CTA prior to ICA. All coronary segments were assessed for image quality (1: excellent; 5: non-diagnostic). The presence of significant vessel stenosis (>50%) was calculated using ICA as standard of reference.

Results

A total of 680 vessels were analyzed. Despite of 45 arrythmic patients all analyzed coronary segments were diagnostically evaluable. Mean Agatston score equivalent was 686 (range 0-4950). ICA revealed 364 lesions with ≥50% diameter stenosis. DSCT correctly identified 336 of these lesions. 115 lesions with a diameter stenosis ≤50% were overestimated by DSCT and thus considered as false-positive findings. On a per-segment basis, sensitivity was 92%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 75% and negative predictive value (NPV) 98%. On a per-vessel basis DSCT revealed a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 88%, a PPV of 78% and a NPV of 97%. On a per-patient basis sensitivity was 94%, specificity 79%, PPV 88% and NPV 90%.

Conclusions

Initial results of preliminary studies showing robust image quality and high accuracy in DSCT cardiac imaging could be approved with the present study enclosing a large consecutive population. However severe coronary calcifications and irregular heart rate still remain limiting factors for coronary CTA.Despite improved image quality and high accuracy of coronary DSCT angiography, proof of indication is necessary, due to still remaining limiting factors.     

Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy?

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the effect of single- versus two-segment image reconstruction on image quality and diagnostic accuracy at 64-section multidetector computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography by using conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study design was approved by a human research committee; patients gave informed consent. The study was HIPAA compliant. Forty consecutive patients (22 men, 18 women; mean age, 61 years +/- 8 [standard deviation]) underwent both 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography and conventional angiography. All data sets were reconstructed by using single- and two-segment image reconstruction algorithms, with resulting temporal resolution of 82.5-165 msec. Two experienced observers independently evaluated image quality and signs of coronary artery disease. A five-level grading scheme was used to grade stenosis (0%, <50%, <70%, <99%, 100%) and image quality (1[unacceptable] to 5[excellent]). Interobserver correlation, Spearman correlation coefficients, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: Six hundred coronary artery segments were visible on conventional angiograms, of which 560 (93.3%) were seen by using single-segment and 561 (93.5%) were seen by using two-segment image reconstruction (P=.35). Mean quality scores were not significantly different (P=.22) for single- (3.1 +/- 0.9) and two-segment (3.2 +/- 0.8) reconstruction. Significantly (P=.03) better image quality was observed for two-segment reconstruction only at heart rates of 80-82 beats per minute, at which temporal resolution was approximately 83 msec. For grading coronary artery stenosis, correlation was 0.64 for single- and 0.66 for two-segment reconstruction (P=.43). Significant stenosis (>50%) was detected on a per-segment basis with 77.1% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity by using single-segment and with 79.2% sensitivity and 99.1% specificity by using two-segment image reconstruction. CONCLUSION: At heart rates of more than 65 beats per minute, use of two-segment reconstruction improves image quality at multidetector CT coronary angiography but does not significantly affect overall diagnostic accuracy compared with single-segment reconstruction.     

Usefulness of 40-slice multidetector row computed tomography to detect coronary disease in patients prior to cardiac valve surgery

Preoperative identification of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients prior to valve surgery requires systematic invasive coronary angiography. The purpose of this current prospective study was to evaluate whether exclusion of CAD by multi-detector CT (MDCT) might potentially avoid systematic cardiac catheterization in these patients. Eighty-two patients (53 males, 62 ± 13 years) scheduled to undergo valve surgery underwent 40-slice MDCT before invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). According to QCA, 15 patients had CAD (5 one-vessel, 6 two-vessel and 4 three-vessel disease). The remaining 67 patients had no CAD. On a per-vessel basis, MDCT correctly identified 27/29 (sensitivity 93%) vessels with and excluded 277/299 vessels (specificity 93%) without CAD. On a per-patient basis, MDCT correctly identified 14/15 patients with (sensitivity 93%) and 60/67 patients without CAD (specificity 90%). Positive and negative predictive values of MDCT were 67% and 98%. Performing invasive angiography only in patients with abnormal MDCT might have avoided QCA in 60/82 (73%). MDCT could be potentially useful in the preoperative evaluation of patients with valve disease. By selecting only those patients with coronary lesions to undergo invasive coronary angiography, it could avoid cardiac catheterization in a large number of patients without CAD. This work was supported by a grant of the Fondation Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique of the Belgian Government (FRSM 3.4557.02). Dr. Pouleur is supported by a personal grant of the Fondation Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique of the Belgian Government.     

64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: diagnostic accuracy in the real world

PURPOSE: This study was done to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis in the real clinical world. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From the CTCA database of our institution, we enrolled 145 patients (92 men, 52 women, mean age 63.4 +/- 10.2 years) with suspected coronary artery disease. All patients presented with atypical or typical chest pain and underwent CTCA and conventional coronary angiography (CA). For the CTCA scan (Sensation 64, Siemens, Germany), we administered an IV bolus of 100 ml of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml, Bracco, Italy). The CTCA and CA reports used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy adopted > or =50% and > or =70%, respectively, as thresholds for significant stenosis. RESULT: Eleven patients were excluded from the analysis because of the nondiagnostic quality of CTCA. The prevalence of disease demonstrated at CA was 63% (84/134). Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for CTCA on a per-segment, per-vessel, and per-patient basis were 75.6%, 85.1%, 97.6%; 86.9%, 81.8%, 58.0%; 48.2%, 68.1%, 79.6%; and 95.7%, 92.3%, 93.5%, respectively. Only two out of 134 eligible patients were false negative. Heart rate did not significantly influence diagnostic accuracy, whereas the absence or minimal presence of coronary calcification improved diagnostic accuracy. The positive and negative likelihood ratios at the per-patient level were 2.32 and 0.041, respectively. CONCLUSION: CTCA in the real clinical world shows a diagnostic performance lower than reported in previous validation studies. The excellent negative predictive value and negative likelihood ratio make CTCA a noninvasive gold standard for exclusion of significant coronary artery disease.     

Coronary artery stenosis: direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection--initial results

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) and of three-dimensional (3D) navigator magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients gave written informed consent for the study, which was approved by the local ethics committee. Twenty-seven patients underwent multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator free-breathing MR imaging a mean of 5 days before undergoing invasive coronary angiography. The acquired multi-detector row CT and MR images were graded for the presence of greater than 50% stenosis in vessels larger than 1.5 mm in diameter. The diagnostic accuracies of the two examinations were compared with that of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) by using the McNemar test. RESULTS: Owing to claustrophobia, MR images were not acquired in one patient; thus, 26 patients were included for analysis. According to QCA findings, 21 of the 26 patients had significant coronary artery disease and 58 (20%) of a total of 294 coronary artery segments larger than 1.5 mm in diameter had significant (>50%) stenosis. Multi-detector row CT had significantly higher sensitivity (46 [79%] of 58 segments) than MR imaging (36 [62%] segments, P < .05) for detection of segments with significant stenosis. Conversely, MR imaging had significantly higher specificity (198 [84%] of 236 segments) than did CT (168 [71%] segments, P < .001) for exclusion of segmental coronary artery stenosis. Both examinations had high negative predictive value for exclusion of segmental stenosis: 93% (168 of 180 segments) for CT and 90% (198 of 220 segments) for MR imaging. The overall diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging (80% [234 of 294 segments]) was significantly higher than that of CT (73% [214 segments], P < .05). CONCLUSION: MR imaging had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than multi-detector row CT in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. Both techniques have high negative predictive value, making them particularly useful for ruling out coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients.     

Dual-source CT coronary angiography: Diagnostic accuracy without the use of B blockers

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of heart rate, heart rate variability on dual-source computed tomography image quality performed without the use of B blockers and to assess diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT (using adaptive electrocardiographic pulsing) for coronary artery stenosis, by using invasive coronary angiography as the reference standard.Materials and methodsPatients were studied without β-blocker pre-medication. Unenhanced CT and CT coronary angiography with adaptive ECG pulsing were performed using DSCT (DEFINITION, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). A contrast-enhanced volume dataset was acquired (two tubes, 120 kV, 400 mAs/rot, collimation 64 × 0.6 mm). Fifty-one patients (11 women, 40 men; mean age, 60.5 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) known to have or suspected of having coronary artery disease underwent dual-source CT and invasive coronary angiography. Accuracy of dual-source CT in depiction or exclusion of significant stenosis (?50%) was evaluated on a per-segment and per-patient basis. Effects of heart rate, heart rate variability were assessed. Patients were divided in three HRF groups: low, intermediate, and high (?65, 66–79, and ?80 beats/min, respectively), and four HRV groups given mean inter beat difference (IBD) during CT coronary angiography: normal, minor, moderate, and severe (IBDs of 0–1, 2–3, 4–10, and >10, respectively). The diagnostic performance was presented as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values validated against invasive coronary angiography (?50% lumen diameter reduction).ResultsGood image quality was achieved in 98% of patients without the use of B blockers and no significant differences in image quality were found among HRF and HRV groups. Twenty-three patients were examined having a heart rate ?65 beats/min, image quality was sufficient for diagnosis in 281 of 312 coronary segments (92%), whereas in 28 patients with a heart rate <65 beats/min, the image quality was sufficient for diagnosis in 387 of 388 coronary segments (100%). On a per-patient basis, 93% of patients (?65 beats/min) and 100% of patients (<65 beats/min) were considered evaluable. None of these differences were statistically significant. Similarly, no difference in diagnostic accuracy was found in per-vessel and -segment analyses.ConclusionIn 51 patients studied without β-blocker pre-medication, the overall image quality of dual-source CT coronary angiography is sufficient for diagnosis within a wide range of mean heart rates and variability of heart rates. Only heart rates that are both high and variable significantly deteriorate image quality, but the quality remains adequate for diagnosis.     

双源CT前瞻性心电门控对较高心率患者冠状动脉成像的准确性研究

目的 评价双源CT(DSCT)前瞻性心电门控对较高心率(HR)冠状动脉成像图像质量及诊断冠心病(CAD)的准确性.方法 回顾性分析103例连续患者的有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)和DSCT前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉成像资料,根据患者DSCT扫描时的心率分成3组,低心率组[<60次/min(bpm)]34例、中等心率组(60-70 bpm)36例和较高心率组(HR>70 bpm)33例.分析各组DSCT冠状动脉成像的图像质量(1～4分),以ICA为金标准,评价不同心率下DSCT前瞻性心电门控诊断CAD(狭窄≥50%)的敏感度和特异度,差异性用x2检验.结果 共1648个冠状动脉节段中的1580个(95.9%)能够满足诊断的图像质量要求,低、中、较高心率3组图像质量评分分别为(3.1±0.3)、(3.1±0.3)和(3.0±0.4)分(x2=2.80,P>0.05).各组诊断CAD的敏感度、特异度分别为82.8%(77/93)和98.4%(428/435),88.3%(91/103)和98.7%(442/448),80.3%(57/71)和98.6%(424/430)(x2值分别为0.69和0.13,P值均>0.05).总体ROC曲线下面积为0.94(95%可信区间为0.92～0.96),平均有效辐射剂量为(3.60±1.60)mSv.结论 DSCT前瞻性心电门控能够用于较高心率患者的冠状动脉成像,与较低心率组在诊断CAD时差异无统计学意义.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT(DSCT)prospective ECG-triggering coronary angiography in patients with different heart rate(HR).Methods One hundred and three patients with suspected coronary artery disease underwent DSCT prospective ECG-triggered coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography(ICA).The patients were grouped by HR during CT scans:low HR(<60 bpm,n=34),medium HR(60-70 bpm,n=36)and high HR(>70 bpm,n=33).Image quality was scored using a 4-point scale.The sensitivity and specificity of DSCT in detecting≥50%stenosis were compared among subgroups where ICA was the gold standard.The differences were compared by using the X2 test of contingency on a per-segment and per-vessel basis.Results Image quality of 1580 coronary artery segments in 1648(95.9%)met the requirements for diagnosis.The image quality scores were(3.1±0.3),(3.1±0.3)and(3.0±0.4)point for subgroups(X2=2.80,P>0.05).Sensitivity and specificity were 82.8%(77/93)and 98.4%(428/435),88.3%(91/103)and 98.7%(442/448),and 80.3%(57/71)and 98.6%(424/430)for different subgroups(X2 were 0.69 and 0.13,all P>0.05).The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was 0.94(95%CI=0.92-0.96).The average effective radiation dose was(3.60±1.60)mSv.Conclusion DSCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering could be used for patients with high HR.And the diagnostic accuracy was not statistical significant between the patients with low HR and patients with medium to high HR.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low-to-intermediate risk

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) for detecting significant stenosis (>or=50% lumen reduction) in a population of patients at low to intermediate risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 72 patients (38 men, 34 women, mean age 53.9+/-8.0 years) with atypical or typical chest pain and stratified in the low-to intermediate risk category. MSCT-CA (Sensation 64 Cardiac, Siemens, Germany) was performed after IV administration of 100 ml of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml, Bracco, Italy). Two observers, blinded to the results of conventional coronary angiography (CAG), assessed the MSCT-CA scans in consensus. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant stenosis was calculated. RESULTS: CAG demonstrated the absence of significant disease in 70.1% of patients (51/72). No patient was excluded from MSCT-CA. There were 37 significant lesions on 1,098 available coronary segments. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of MSCT-CA for detecting significant coronary artery on a per-segment basis were 100%, 98.6%, 71.2% and 100%, respectively. All patients with at least one significant lesion were correctly identified by MSCT-CA. MSCT-CA scored 15 false positives on a per-segment base, which affected only marginally the per-patient performance (only one false positive). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that 64-slice CT-CA is a diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and negative predictive value in patients at low to intermediate risk.