经皮颈动脉支架置入术的临床应用及效果

目的评价经皮颈动脉支架置入术对预防缺血性脑卒中的临床效果。方法对30例患者(共32个严重颈动脉狭窄病变)行经皮颈动脉支架置入术,包括男性26例,女性4例,年龄>56岁,其中13例曾患有脑卒中或反复一过性脑缺血;部分患者有高血压、糖尿病及心肌梗死病史。均在术前行颈动脉超声检查及颈动脉及其颅内段血管造影,将支架置入并覆盖颈动脉病变,部分采用远端脑保护装置;在术后均做心脑血管专科及颈动脉超声检查随访。结果选择性颈动脉造影示32个靶病变均有>70%的狭窄,共置入自膨式支架32个,球囊扩张式支架1个,支架置入成功率为97%;使用远端滤网保护装置21例,使用成功率为95%,在回收的滤网中均发现脱落碎片;4例患者在颈动脉支架置入术后顺利完成外科冠状动脉搭桥术;2例患者在术中分别出现靶病变对侧颅内出血和术后急性肺水肿,3d后死亡。在临床随访观察期间,患者均无脑卒中发生,颈动脉超声检查未发现支架置入段再狭窄。结论经皮颈动脉支架置入术是预防缺血性脑卒中的安全有效方法,也是综合治疗缺血性心脑疾病的新方法。远端保护装置的应用是防止术中脑卒中并发症的必要措施。     

Abciximab for the treatment of acute distal embolization associated with internal carotid artery angioplasty.

Carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement (CAS) can be complicated by procedure-related distal embolization and thrombus formation, potentially resulting in neurological sequelae. Patient A had CAS of left internal carotid artery and had loss of vision in the left eye with no flow in the left ophthalmic artery. Patient B had CAS of right internal carotid artery and developed left sided hemiparesis with total occlusion of the right middle cerebral artery. A selective intra-arterial injection of 5 mg of abciximab locally followed by a bolus of 5 mg of abciximab intravenously resulted in complete resolution of the filling defect on repeat angiography after 10 min in both patients.     

颈动脉支架断裂

颈动脉支架断裂（carotid artery stent fracture,CASF）是颈动脉支架置入术（carotid artery stenting,CAS）的一种少见并发症,其发生可能与血管成角、钙化、支架类型、支架长度、重叠等相关。文章对CASF的发生率、影响因素、分型、后果和处理方法进行了综述。     

Carotid Wallstent Versus Roadsaver Stent and Distal Versus Proximal Protection on Cerebral Microembolization During Carotid Artery Stenting

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to randomly compare the double-layer Roadsaver stent (RS) (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) with the single-layer Carotid Wallstent (CW) (Boston Scientific, Santa Clara, California) in association with either distal embolic protection with the FilterWire (FW) device (Boston Scientific) or proximal protection with the Mo.Ma Ultra device (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) in patients with lipid-rich carotid plaques.BackgroundThe role of both stent type and brain protection during carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains unsettled.MethodsA total of 104 consecutive patients with carotid artery stenosis were randomized to CAS with FW + RS (group 1, n = 27), FW + CW (group 2, n = 25), Mo.Ma + RS (group 3, n = 27), or Mo.Ma + CW (group 4, n = 25). The primary endpoint was the number of microembolic signals (MES) on transcranial Doppler among groups in the following CAS steps: 1 and 2) target vessel access; 3) lesion wiring; 4) pre-dilation; 5) stent crossing; 6) stent deployment; 7) stent dilation; and 8) device retrieval and deflation.ResultsNo significant differences in baseline characteristics were found among the 4 groups. Compared with the FW device, the Mo.Ma Ultra device significantly reduced mean MES count (p < 0.0001) during lesion crossing, stent crossing, stent deployment, and post-dilation. Compared with the CW, the RS significantly reduced MES count (p = 0.016) in steps 6 to 8, including spontaneous MES (29% of patients). The combination of Mo.Ma + RS performed significantly better than Mo.Ma + CW (p = 0.043). Clinical major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred in 3 patients (p = 0.51). After CAS, peak systolic velocity significantly decreased in all patients. In-stent restenosis developed in 1 patient (0.98%) at 6-month follow-up. The RS was an independent predictor of external carotid artery patency over time.ConclusionsIn patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque undergoing CAS, Mo.Ma + RS led to the lowest microembolic signals count. (Role of the Type of Carotid Stent and Cerebral Protection on Cerebral Microembolization During Carotid Artery Stenting. A Randomized Study Comparing Carotid Wallstent vs Roadsaver® Stent and Distal vs Proximal Protection; NCT02915328)     

1-Month Results From a Prospective Experience on CAS Using CGuard Stent System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study

ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate 30-day safety and efficacy of dual-layer mesh-covered carotid stent systems for carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the clinical practice.BackgroundWhen compared with carotid endarterectomy, CAS has been associated with a higher rate of post procedural neurologic events; these could be related to plaque’s debris prolapsing through stent’s mesh. Consequently, the need for increased plaque coverage has resulted in the development of dual-layer mesh-covered carotid stent systems.MethodsFrom January 2017 to June 2019, a physician-initiated, prospective, multispecialty registry enrolled 733 consecutive patients undergoing CAS using the CGuard embolic prevention system in 20 centers. The primary endpoint was stroke up to 30 days; secondary endpoints were technical and procedural success; external carotid artery occlusion; and in-hospital and 30-day transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and death rates.ResultsSymptoms were present in 131 (17.87%) patients. An embolic protection device was used in 731 (99.72%) patients. Procedural success was 100%, technical success was obtained in all but 1 (99.86%) patient, who died in hospital due to a hemorrhagic stroke. Six TIAs, 2 minor strokes, and 1 AMI occurred during in-hospital stay, and external carotid artery occlusion was evident in 8 (1.09%) patients. Between hospital discharge and 30-day follow-up, 2 TIAs, 1 minor stroke, and 3 AMIs occurred. Therefore, the cumulative stroke rate was 0.54%.ConclusionsThis real-world registry suggests that use of CGuard embolic prevention system in clinical practice is safe and associated with a minimal occurrence of adverse neurological events up to 30-day follow-up.     

Feasibility of carotid artery stenting in patients with angiographic string sign

Background : Treatment of angiographic string sign (SS) of the carotid artery with carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been associated with a high incidence of periprocedural neurological events. We describe our experience with CAS in a case series of symptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis and angiographic SS. Methods : We performed a retrospective review from 1999 to 2009 using our cardiac cath laboratory database and identified nine patients with the angiographic SS who underwent CAS. All patients were referred for carotid angiography by a neurologist due to symptoms (stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)). All lesions were predilated and treated with self‐expanding stents. Distal protection devices were utilized (six patients) once they became available. Periprocedural outcomes and long‐term follow‐up was reviewed when available. Results : The average time from onset of symptoms to CAS was 45 days. All CAS procedures were technically and clinically successful without acute complications. One year follow‐up was available in eight patients. One patient had a possible TIA, and the remaining seven patients did not report any events (death, stroke, TIA or myocardial infarction). Carotid ultrasound evaluation at 12 months was available in six patients and showed no evidence of restenosis. Conclusions : In our experience, CAS in patients with severe symptomatic carotid stenosis and angiographic SS is feasible, with an acceptably low periprocedural complication rate. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. State of the art

A carotid stenosis is responsible for about 30% of strokes occurring. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is considered to be the gold standard treatment of a carotid stenosis. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is emerging as a new alternative treatment for a carotid artery stenosis, but the risk of neurological complications and brain embolism remain the major drawback to this procedure. So as to reduce the risk, we need: good indications, good patient and lesion selection; correct techniques; brain protection devices (cerebral protection devices should be routinely used and are mandatory for any procedure. Three types of protection devices are available: filters are the most commonly used. Nevertheless, all protection devices have limitations and cannot prevent from embolic events. However neurological complications can be reduced by 60%. New protection devices will be discussed); good choice of the stent and correct implantation (all stents are not equivalent and have different geometrical effects); pharmacological adjuncts; good team. Indications are well accepted for high-risk patients and recent studies have shown that CAS has superior short-term outcomes than CEA in this group of patients. Indications for low-risk and asymptomatic patients are controversial. New selection criteria have to be discussed. But there are enough reported data to conclude that CAS is also not inferior to CEA in low-risk and asymptomatic patients. In our series of 844 procedures, without protection (n = 187) 30-day death and stroke rate was 3.7% and with protection (n = 657) 1% (1.3% for symptomatic patients, 0.9% for asymptomatic patients, 1.4% in high-risk patients, 0.4% in low-risk patients). CAS under protection is the standard of care and is maybe becoming the gold standard treatment of a carotid stenosis at least in some subgroups of patients.     

经桡动脉途径行颈动脉支架置入术

目的 探讨经桡动脉途径行颈动脉支架治疗的可行性及安全性.方法 2011年2月至2011年12月邵逸夫医院心内科行颈动脉造影明确颈动脉狭窄≥70％患者12例通过桡动脉途径行颈动脉支架置入术.探讨手术成功率和并发症情况.结果 经桡动脉途径行颈动脉支架12例,左侧颈内动脉6例,右侧颈内动脉6例,均成功置入.平均手术时间(45 ± 11) min.1例术中出现TIA,2小时后恢复,2例术中出现血压、心率下降,予对症处理后,立即恢复,无桡动脉闭塞及前臂血肿等并发症.结论 经桡动脉途径行颈动脉支架治疗初步证明是安全可行的.     

Outcomes following extracranial carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients

BACKGROUND: Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting has become a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA), especially for patients considered at high risk for post-operative complications. This study investigated the feasibility, safety and long-term outcome of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in high-risk patients. METHODS: From July 1995 to November 2000, sixty-two consecutive patients considered to be at high risk for post-operative complications of CEA were followed prospectively after undergoing extracranial CAS procedures. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients [37 men (60%) and 25 women (40%)] underwent a total of 69 CAS procedures. The mean age was 67 +/- 9 years (range, 32-89 years). Comorbid conditions included hypertension in 95% and severe coronary artery disease in 58%. Sixteen patients (26%) had a previous ipsilateral CEA, twenty-one percent had a history of neck radiation and 32% had a history of significant contralateral carotid artery disease. Fifty-two patients (84%) were symptomatic. All 69 CAS procedures were technically successful. The major post-operative complications were two minor strokes (2.8%), one major stroke (1.4%) and one fatal major stroke (1.4%). The mean length of follow-up was 17 months (range, 4 months to 5.6 years). Two patients (2.8%) have suffered ipsilateral neurologic events following CAS. Long-term follow-up revealed restenosis at 6 months in 4 patients (5.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting is safe and feasible. This procedure produces satisfactory outcomes in patients who are at high risk for post-operative complications of CEA.     

颈动脉术后再狭窄的支架置入疗效分析

目的评价颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)治疗颈动脉术后再狭窄病变的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析首都医科大学宣武医院神经外科支架置入治疗的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或CAS后再狭窄的19例患者,均为男性,年龄为48~78岁,平均(61.5±8.6)岁。其中CAS后再狭窄9例,CEA后再狭窄10例,均经DSA确诊,并行CAS治疗再狭窄,术前及术后第2天均行颈动脉彩色多普勒血流显像检查,术后1、3、6、12个月门诊随访。结果对19例患者均成功置入支架,未出现并发症,残余狭窄率均20%。术后患者自觉神经缺损症状消失。术后各时间点随访均未发现心肌梗死、卒中及死亡事件。随访终点时患者均无临床症状,复查颈动脉彩色多普勒血流显像均未显示再狭窄。结论 CAS治疗颈动脉术后再狭窄可能是一种安全有效的方法。     

Covered versus bare self-expanding stents for endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis: a stopped randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether filter-protected carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a covered self-expanding stent reduces the risk of cerebral embolization. METHODS: Fourteen asymptomatic patients (13 men; median age 77 years, IQR 73-83) were enrolled in a randomized pilot trial comparing the rates of cerebral microembolism during and after filter-protected CAS using either a self-expanding covered (n=8) or a bare (n=6) carotid stent. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring was done during and for 90 minutes after the procedure. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed before and 24 hours after CAS. Patients were followed for 6 months for neurological events and occurrence of restenosis. RESULTS: A significant reduction in ipsilateral microembolic signals by TCD was observed with the covered (median 1, IQR 0-4) versus the bare stent (median 6, IQR 3-8; p=0.043). Comparison of the preprocedural and 24-hour postprocedural DW-MRI images showed no new ipsilateral lesions but 1 new lesion in the contralateral hemisphere in the covered stent group, resulting in an overall 7% (95% CI 0%-20%) rate of new ischemic lesions. No neurological complications occurred up to 6 months. Restenosis (>70%) occurred in 3 (38%) of 8 patients with the covered versus none of the bare stents (p=0.21). The trial was stopped when the third restenosis of a covered stent was detected. CONCLUSION: Self-expanding covered stents potentially reduce the risk of cerebral microembolism during and after carotid stenting. However, the problem of in-stent restenosis has to be resolved before these devices can be considered for further investigation.     

Safety and performance of the EverProTM everolimus-eluting coronary stent system with biodegradable polymer in a real-world scenario

BACKGROUNDThe EverPro^TM (Sahajanand Laser Technology Ltd., India) everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (EES) is a second-generation drug-eluting stent with a biodegradable polymer.AIMTo determine the safety and performance of the EverPro^TM EES in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) during a 1-year clinical follow-up.METHODSThis observational, retrospective, single-center study enrolled patients who had been implanted with the EverPro^TM stent between June 1, 2018 and January 31, 2019, and had completed a 1-year follow-up period after the index procedure. The primary clinical endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6 mo defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints were the incidence of TLR at 1, 6 and 12 mo follow-up, MACE at 1 and 12 mo follow-up, and stent thrombosis up to 1 year after the index procedure.RESULTSThe study population comprised 77 patients (98 lesions). A total of 37 (48.1%) patients had comorbid hypertension. In total, 26 (33.8%) patients presented with ST segment elevation MI and 10.4% patients with non-ST segment elevation MI. Treated lesions were located mainly in the left anterior descending artery (49%) followed by the right coronary artery (29.6%), left circumflex (12.2%) and obtuse marginal (9.2%) arteries. The majority of patients were with single-vessel disease (79%), 22.2% of lesions had a mild to severe thrombus load, and 94.9% were American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type B or C. De novo stenting was performed in 96.9% of patients and 3% were treated for in-stent restenosis. Procedural success was attained in all patients. In-hospital or follow-up MACE and stent thrombosis were not reported during the 1-year follow-up period.CONCLUSIONThese findings suggest that the EverPro^TM EES is a safe and effective treatment option with no MACE or stent thrombosis reported during the 1-year study period in patients with CAD.     

Procedure-related complications and early neurological adverse events of unprotected and protected carotid stenting: temporal trends in a consecutive patient series.

PURPOSE: To report procedure-related complications and neurological adverse events of unprotected over-the-wire (OTW) and protected rapid exchange (RX) carotid artery stenting (CAS) in a single-center patient series during an 8-year period. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2004, 651 consecutive patients (445 men; median age 72 years, interquartile range 64-77) were enrolled in a registry database of carotid stent procedures; from 1997 to 2002, 471 patients underwent unprotected CAS using an OTW technique, while the other 180 patients were treated with protected CAS using RX monorail systems from 2003 to 2004. Technical success and complications (neurological, hemodynamic instability, and access site) up to 30 days post intervention were analyzed. RESULTS: Technical success improved from 95% with unprotected OTW CAS to 99% with protected RX CAS (p=0.025). Procedure-related complications occurred in 86 (18.3%) of 471 unprotected OTW CAS versus 18 (10.0%) of 180 protected RX CAS procedures (p=0.010). Transient ischemic attacks (3.2% versus 2.8%), minor stroke (1.7% versus 0.6%), and major stroke (2.1% versus 0.6%) showed a trend toward a difference between unprotected OTW and protected RX CAS (p=0.076); combined 30-day stroke/death rates were 3.8% for OTW versus 1.2% for RX CAS (p=0.073). During the 8-year period from 1997 to 2004, the annual rates of procedure-related complications (p=0.002), neurological events (p=0.040), and stroke and death (p=0.14) markedly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stenting became substantially safer in the era of protected RX technology. In addition to a reduction in neurological complications, which may be due to cerebral protection devices, the improved technical success and reduced non-neurological procedure-related complications are likely due to recent technical advances unrelated to cerebral protection.     

Peri-procedural outcome of series of 104 carotid artery stenting procedures

BackgroundManagement of carotid artery stenosis is considered an important strategy for stroke prevention. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been introduced as an acceptable alternative to surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.ObjectiveAssessment of peri-procedural outcome of CAS in 104 consecutive procedures.MethodsThe study included 104 consecutive CAS procedures. Included patients had ⩾50% ICA stenosis in the symptomatic group and ⩾70% stenosis in the asymptomatic group. Procedures were performed in cath. labs of Catania and Ragusa hospitals-Italy.ResultsIncluded procedures were done in 100 consecutive eligible patients with ICA stenosis. Four patients had undergone CAS procedures in both sides in 2 separate sessions. Patients were 71 males and 29 females, mean age was 71.9 ± 7.85 years, and 21 patients were ⩾80 years old (octogenarians). The majority of patients had asymptomatic ICA stenosis (76%) and was diagnosed accidentally during medical checkup. Twenty-four patients had symptomatic ICA stenosis (ipsilateral TIA or stroke). Technical success was obtained in 103 procedures (99%). Embolic protection devices were used in all succeeded cases. Combined cerebrovascular events had occurred in 5 patients with estimated rate = 4.8%. No cases of amaurosis fugax, MI or death had occurred. Adverse events was 4.1% in the symptomatic group and 1.3% in the asymptomatic group with no significant statistical difference (P = 0.064).ConclusionCAS with EPDs seems a feasible and safe procedure and could be performed with an acceptable rate of periprocedural adverse events.     

1-Year Results From a Prospective Experience on CAS Using the CGuard Stent System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-year safety and efficacy of a dual-layered stent (DLS) for carotid artery stenting (CAS) in a multicenter registry.BackgroundDLS have been proved to be safe and efficient during short-term follow-up. Recent data have raised the concern that the benefit of CAS performed with using a DLS may be hampered by a higher restenosis rate at 1 year.MethodsFrom January 2017 to June 2019, a physician-initiated, prospective, multispecialty registry enrolled 733 consecutive patients undergoing CAS using the CGuard embolic prevention system at 20 centers. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of death and stroke at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were 1-year rates of transient ischemic attack, acute myocardial infarction, internal carotid artery (ICA) restenosis, in-stent thrombosis, and external carotid artery occlusion.ResultsAt 1 year, follow-up was available in 726 patients (99.04%). Beyond 30 days postprocedure, 1 minor stroke (0.13%), four transient ischemic attacks (0.55%), 2 fatal acute myocardial infarctions (0.27%), and 6 noncardiac deaths (1.10%) occurred. On duplex ultrasound examination, ICA restenosis was found in 6 patients (0.82%): 2 total occlusions and 4 in-stent restenoses. No predictors of target ICA restenosis and/or occlusion could be detected, and dual-antiplatelet therapy duration (90 days vs 30 days) was not found to be related to major adverse cardiovascular event or restenosis occurrence.ConclusionsThis real-world registry suggests that DLS use in clinical practice is safe and associated with minimal occurrence of adverse neurologic events up to 12-month follow-up.     

Usefulness of a Perfusion Balloon for Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis in a Patient With ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock

Intraprocedural stent thrombosis is a rare but serious complication of reperfusion therapy for acute coronary syndrome. There is currently no consensus on the intraprocedural management of intraprocedural stent thrombosis. It is difficult to attain thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3, particularly in cases of cardiogenic shock.A 49-year-old man who presented with anterior ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention to diffuse proximal lesions in the left anterior descending artery under the support of intra-aortic balloon pumping. Intraprocedural stent thrombosis occurred following the postdilations with a 3.5- × 38-mm everolimus-eluting stent. Despite administration of argatroban and nitroprusside, and after frequent balloon inflations using 3.5-mm noncompliant balloons and thrombectomy, the no-reflow phenomenon was repetitively established. However, after brief and prolonged balloon inflations using 3.5- and 3-mm Ryusei perfusion balloon catheters (Kaneka Medix), the diffusely protruded thrombus inside the stent regressed, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 was obtained. The final intravascular ultrasound image showed a well-suppressed, in-stent thrombus and 24% gain of stent area (from 7.5 to 9.3 mm²).A Ryusei perfusion balloon enabled frequent, long inflation times without deteriorating hemodynamics during reperfusion in ST-segment elevated acute myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock. Thus, extended balloon inflation using a perfusion balloon is deemed a viable option not only for intraprocedural stent thrombosis but also for cases with a high burden of thrombi during the primary stenting procedure for patients with acute coronary syndrome.     

Carotid angioplasty with stenting in post-carotid endarterectomy restenosis

Recurrent stenosis post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is not a solitary or unusual phenomenon. Compared to the initial CEA, the reoperation is often more technically challenging and frequently results in local and neurological complications. Carotid artery angioplasty with stenting (CAS) is currently being investigated as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy. In our study, ninety-nine patients underwent CAS in 110 arteries. Procedural success was 99% (109/110). Our results show that CAS treatment in post-CEA restenosis, especially with improved technique and distal protection, is safe with a low neurological complication rate, without any "local" complications and without any cranial nerve palsies. This study suggests that the future primary mode of treatment of post-CEA restenosis might be carotid stenting rather than surgery.     

Successful utilization of a novel aspiration thrombectomy catheter (Pronto) for the treatment of patients with stent thrombosis.

Stent thrombosis is a rare but catastrophic complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Thrombolytic therapy is ineffective for the treatment of patients with stent thrombosis, while primary PCI in such patients is limited by a high thrombus burden in the culprit vessel often leading to distal embolization and extensive tissue infarction. We present three patients with stent thrombosis successfully treated with the adjunctive use of a novel and new aspiration thrombectomy device (Pronto).     

Feasibility and efficacy of balloon-based neuroprotection during carotid artery stenting in a single-center setting

We sought to prospectively assess the feasibility and in-hospital efficacy of the PercuSurge GuardWire temporary balloon-occlusive system for neuroprotection during carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS).Carotid angioplasty and stenting harbors a risk of distal embolization. Cerebral protection devices are currently under clinical investigation.Ninety-six consecutive patients with carotid bifurcation disease underwent a total of 102 CAS procedures with the intention to use the GuardWire for neuroprotection.GuardWire deployment was achieved in 99 procedures performed in 93 patients (97%). Device failure (n = 3) and severe neurologic responses to balloon occlusion of the targeted carotid artery (n = 2) accounted for five additional procedures that were essentially concluded without neuroprotection, for a total of 94 procedures completed as intended in 88 patients (92% procedural feasibility rate). Carotid angioplasty and stenting was performed successfully in 94 patients (100 procedures). There were no in-hospital deaths; but three patients (3.1%) sustained strokes, and two patients experienced transient ischemic attacks, for a total periprocedural complication rate of 5.2%. One major stroke occurred with the GuardWire in place, whereas two minor strokes were observed in patients in whom the device could not be deployed. Thus, successful neuroprotected CAS without major neurologic events was achieved in 87 patients (91%).The GuardWire temporary balloon-occlusive system is feasible as an adjunct to CAS in the majority of patients. It is associated with a 3.1% rate of major periprocedural neurologic complications. Adverse neurologic reactions to balloon occlusion may prohibit effective use of the system in about 2% of patients.     

Optical coherence tomography findings during "evolving" stent thrombosis

Stent thrombosis is a rare but feared complication. While intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography are frequently used to unravel mechanical predisposing factors in patients suffering from this dreadful complication, no information exists on the early pathophysiology of stent thrombosis before coronary flow has been interrupted. We present a case where optical coherence tomography was used to gain novel insights into the earliest stages of stent thrombosis. In our patient with a possible "evolving" stent thrombosis, optical coherence tomography revealed a unique "spider web-like" or "cheese-like" thrombus morphology not previously reported.