Image-guided brachytherapy following external-beam radiation therapy for patients with inoperable endometrial cancer

ObjectiveTo investigate the outcomes of definitive external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) unsuitable for surgery.MethodsA total of 50 patients with inoperable EC were included. The patients received EBRT in a median dose of 45 Gy to the pelvis over 5 weeks. Thereafter, the patients received brachytherapy using tandem and ovoid applicators. High-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and gross tumor volume in brachytherapy (GTVp) were defined by the assistance of patients’ pre-IGBT magnetic resonance imaging.ResultsThe medical records of the 50 patients were analyzed. The main causes of inoperability were anesthesia contraindications, namely medical comorbidities and obesity. The median cumulative D90s (the minimum dose delivered to 90% of the volume) in EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions) to the HR-CTV and GTVp were 72.9 Gy10 (range, 64.9 to 80.3) and 166.2 Gy10 (range, 123.0 to 189.8), respectively. Over a median follow-up period of 27 months, 8 of the patients died of cancer. The 2-year overall and cancer-specific survival rates were 75% and 83%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of pelvic and distant failure were 4% (n = 2) and 16% (n = 8), respectively. Gastrointestinal complications of grade 2 or above were noted in 2 patients (4%), and a grade 2 genitourinary complication was noted in one.ConclusionsFor patients with inoperable EC, EBRT followed by IGBT is an effective approach for achieving high local control without a high risk of complications.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma post abdominoperineal resection of the rectum and pelvic irradiation: Technique and experience

PurposeTreatment options are limited for patients with localized prostate cancer and a prior history of abdominoperineal resection (APR) and pelvic irradiation. We have previously reported on the successful utility of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy salvage for prostate cancer failing definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). In this report, we describe our technique and early experience with definitive HDR brachytherapy in patients post APR and pelvic EBRT.Patients and MethodsSix men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer had a prior history of APR and pelvic EBRT. Sixteen to 18 HDR catheters were placed transperineally under transperineal ultrasound–guidance. The critical first two catheters were placed freehand posterior to the inferior rami on both sides of the bulbar urethra under cystoscopic visualization. A template was used for subsequent catheter placement. Using CT-based planning, 5 men received 36 Gy in six fractions as monotherapy. One patient initially treated with EBRT to 30 Gy, received 24 Gy in four fractions.ResultsMedian age was 67.5 (56–74) years. At a median followup of 26 (14–60) months, all patients are alive and with no evidence of disease per the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure, with a median prostate-specific antigen nadir of 0.19 ng/mL. Three men have reported grade 2 late genitourinary toxicity. There has been no report of grade 3–5 toxicity.ConclusionTransperineal ultrasound–guided HDR brachytherapy using the above technique should be considered as definitive therapy for patients with localized prostate cancer and a prior history of APR and pelvic EBRT.     

Magnetic resonance imaging response in patients treated with definitive radiation therapy for medically inoperable endometrial cancer—Does it predict treatment response?

PurposeMany patients with endometrial cancer cannot undergo surgery and instead receive definitive radiation therapy (RT). We investigate the correlation between MRI response to RT and clinical outcomes.Methods and MaterialsWomen with inoperable, clinical Stage I endometrial cancer were treated with definitive brachytherapy (BT) with/without pelvic RT (PRT). Patients underwent MRI with functional diffusion-weighted imaging before and after RT. A radiologist retrospectively classified cases as complete, partial, or indeterminate response (CR, PR, or IR, respectively) vs. disease progression. Local control was clinicopathologically defined.ResultsFrom 2007 to 2017, 50 women underwent definitive RT. Thirty-five (70%) received BT alone (median dose 37.5 Gy). For combined therapy, the median PRT and BT doses were 45 and 25 Gy, respectively. Median gross tumor volume and high-risk clinical target volume were 7.1 cc and 90.0 cc, respectively. Median followup among living patients was 20 months. All patients underwent post-RT MRI with T1/T2 sequencing at a median of 3.2 months after RT; 40 patients (80%) underwent functional diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. On initial post-RT MRI, CR was documented in 42 patients (84%), IR in 1 patient (2%), and PR in seven patients (14%). At median followup of 16.3 months, no CR patients had uterine failure. Among eight patients with initial PR/IR, all were found to be clinicopathologically no evidence of disease at the uterus on further evaluation.ConclusionsDefinitive RT with BT or BT + PRT is associated with high response rates on MRI. Overall, initial CR predicted for excellent outcome with no infield failure.     

Long term outcomes of Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa treated with High Dose Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To analyze the long-term local control, overall survival and toxicity in Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa patients treated with interstitial brachytherapy.METHODS AND MATERIALS: This analysis included patients diagnosed as Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa on biopsy and treated with radical brachytherapy or External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by brachytherapy boost. All patients received High dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy. The total dose was 35 Gy in ten fractions for brachytherapy alone. Patients who received EBRT (50–54 Gy) were boosted by brachytherapy to a dose of 18–24 Gy in 6–8 fractions. All patients were treated using CT based planning.RESULTS: Between 2007 to 2017, a total of 24 patients of Carcinoma Buccal Mucosa received HDR interstitial brachytherapy either alone or as a boost. Majority of the patients were tobacco chewers (80%). 17(71%) patients were clinical stage T2N0M0 and 7(29%) were clinically T1N0M0. At a median follow up of 7 years (3–12 years), the local control rate was 100% in stage I and 88% in stage II. The 5 year overall survival rate was 80%. Two patients developed nodal recurrence and one patient developed distant metastasis within two years of treatment. Tumor size and brachytherapy technique (radical vs. boost) did not impact local control or overall survival (p > 0.05). Majority of the acute toxicities were Grade 1 and 2. One patient developed osteoradionecrosis of the mandible.CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial brachytherapy in early-stage Buccal Mucosa cancer either alone or as a boost provides excellent long term local control and overall survival. The acute and late toxicities are acceptable with majority of the patients presenting with Grade 1 or 2 toxicity.     

High-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer in previously irradiated patients

PurposePreoperative high-dose-rate (HDR) endorectal brachytherapy is well tolerated among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, these studies excluded patients who previously received pelvic radiation therapy (RT). Because a favorable toxicity profile has been published for HDR endorectal brachytherapy, we evaluated this technique in patients who have previously received pelvic irradiation.Methods and MaterialsWe included patients who had received pelvic irradiation for a previous pelvic malignancy and later received preoperative HDR endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer. Brachytherapy was delivered to a total dose of 26 Gy in 4 consecutive daily 6.5 Gy fractions.ResultsWe evaluated 10 patients who previously received pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone (n=6), EBRT and brachytherapy (n=2), or brachytherapy alone (n=2). The median interval between the initial course of RT and endorectal brachytherapy was approximately 11 years (range, 1-19 years). Two patients experienced a complete pathologic response while 1 patient had a near complete pathologic response. No acute grade ≥3 toxicity was observed. No intraoperative or postoperative surgical complications were observed.ConclusionsPreoperative HDR endorectal brachytherapy is an alternative to EBRT for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have previously received pelvic RT.     

A prospective study of radical external beam radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy combined with intraluminal brachytherapy for primary esophageal cancer

PURPOSEThis study compared the efficacy and side effects of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) + intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) with EBRT alone in patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODSBetween 2013 and 2020, 64 patients with primary thoracic esophageal cancer without surgery received radiotherapy. Thirty-two patients received EBRT + IBT. EBRT dose was 50 Gy, 2 Gy/f, 5 times a week, and IBT dose was 10 Gy, 5 Gy/f, once a week. Thirty-two patients received EBRT alone, and the total dose was 60 Gy. The median followup was 19 months.RESULTSThe local control rates (LCR) of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment were 88% and 72%, 53% and 22%, 25%, and 9%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) of the EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group at 3 years after treatment were 38% and 9%. The 3-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates of EBRT + IBT and EBRT alone group were 25% and 9%. Univariate analysis showed that EBRT + IBT could be the prognostic factor improving OS (p = 0.04), and tumor located in the mid-thoracic region exhibited a poorer prognosis on LRFS (p = 0.03). Grade 3 or higher acute side effects included two cases of dysphagia and three cases of bone marrow suppression. Severe late side effects included three cases of fistula, three cases of radiation pneumonia, and five cases of stenosis requiring treatment.CONCLUSIONSCompared with EBRT alone, EBRT + IBT is an effective treatment modality for T1～3NanyM0 primary thoracic esophageal cancer with good local control. It can prolong the survival time of patients and has acceptable toxicity.     

PSA: Declining utilization of prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSETo analyze rates of brachytherapy use for prostate cancer over time and evaluate patient characteristics, demographics and factors predictive for its utilization.METHODSData was retrospectively analyzed from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with localized prostate cancer treated between 2010 and 2015. Patients were included if they had biopsy confirmed localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate, were treated with radiation as definitive local therapy, and were at least 18 years old. Utilization rates of external beam radiation (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT) and combination (EBRT + BT) were evaluated over time. Univariable (UVA) and backwards elimination multivariable (MVA) analysis were performed to determine characteristics predictive for brachytherapy use.RESULTSWe analyzed 178,837 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated between 2010 and 2015 with radiation therapy. During this period, the use of EBRT increased from 67% to 78%, BT (both monotherapy and combination with EBRT) decreased from 33% to 22%, BT monotherapy decreased from 25% to 16% and EBRT + BT decreased from 8% to 6%. Age >70, government funded insurance or lack of insurance, intermediate or high-risk disease and treatment at an academic center were associated with significantly lower utilization of brachytherapy (all p <0.001), while higher median zip code income was associated with increased use (p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis patients who were younger, had private insurance, were lower NCCN risk category and treated in non-academic cancer centers, had a higher rate of brachytherapy utilization. Notably, on both UVA and MVA brachytherapy practice decreased with increasing year of diagnosis (OR 0.881, 95% CI 0.853–0.910, p <0.001).CONCLUSIONRates of brachytherapy utilization for the treatment of prostate cancer continue to decrease over time. Treatment at an academic center was associated with reduced likelihood of brachytherapy use. This has significant implications for the training of future radiation oncology residents/fellows and direct consequences for both our patients and healthcare expenditure.     

Role of brachytherapy in stage III endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: Identifying factors predictive of a survival benefit

OBJECTIVESTo determine which patients with stage III endometrial cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy derive benefit from the addition of vaginal brachytherapy, as stage III is a highly heterogeneous population with substantial variations in practice.METHODSPatients with FIGO stage III endometrial carcinoma diagnosed 2004–2016 who underwent at least total hysterectomy and adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was overall survival according to receipt of brachytherapy, stratified by histologic type, pathological features, and status of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox multivariable regression.RESULTSIn total, 9369 patients were identified (24% stage IIIA, 5% stage IIIB, 71% stage IIIC; 61% endometrioid, 39% nonendometrioid histology), and 28% received brachytherapy. In the endometrioid cohort, brachytherapy was associated with a 5% absolute increase in 3-year overall survival (87% vs. 82%, p < 0.0001), which persisted in multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.64–0.84, p < 0.0001). The benefit of brachytherapy was greater in patients not also receiving EBRT, and in patients with vaginal/parametrial extension, grade 3 disease, lymphovascular invasion, and/or deep myometrial invasion. In the nonendometrioid cohort, brachytherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit in univariable but not multivariable analysis, regardless of EBRT status or pathological features.CONCLUSIONSFactors predictive of brachytherapy benefit were endometrioid histology and pathological risk factors for local recurrence. Additionally, brachytherapy appeared more beneficial in patients not already receiving pelvic EBRT. Further research is warranted to determine which stage III patients may be best served by brachytherapy, EBRT, or both.     

Addition of intracavitary brachytherapy to external beam radiation therapy for T1–T2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PurposeWe compared efficacy and toxicity outcomes of patients with T1–T2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in combination with intracavitary brachytherapy (BT) vs. a historical cohort treated with EBRT alone.Methods and MaterialsOf the 348 NPC patients diagnosed with T1–2N0–3M0 disease, 175 received EBRT + BT and 173 received EBRT alone. For the EBRT + BT group, median dose of EBRT was 58 Gy and median dose of BT was 20 Gy; for the EBRT group, median dose was 72 Gy (range, 60–82.4 Gy). Measured outcomes included 5- and 10-year local control (LC), regional failure–free survival, distant metastasis–free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival (OS), and late toxicity.ResultsMedian followup duration was 120 months (range, 5–190). Ten-year OS and LC rates for the EBRT + BT and EBRT-alone groups were 71.7% vs. 49.9% and 94.0% vs. 85.2%, respectively (χ² = 21.273, p = 0.000 for OS and χ² = 4.684, p = 0.030 for LC). Late complication rates for EBRT + BT were generally lower compared with the EBRT-alone group except for nasopharyngeal ulceration or necrosis, where the rate was higher but not statistically significant. Both stage of disease at diagnosis and treatment techniques (i.e., the use of BT) were significant predictive factors for OS and LC.ConclusionIntracavitary BT in combination with EBRT may improve the therapeutic ratio for T1–T2 NPC.     

What is appropriate target delineation for MRI-based brachytherapy for medically inoperable endometrial cancer?

PURPOSEFor medically inoperable endometrial cancer (MIEC), the volumetric target of image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) techniques is not well established. We propose a high-risk CTV (HRCTV) concept and report associated rates of local control and toxicity.METHODS AND MATERIALSFor all MIEC patients receiving definitive external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by MRI-based IGBT at a single institution, BT dose was prescribed to HRCTV defined as GTV plus endometrial cavity with a planning goal of a summed EQD2 D90 of ≥85 Gy. Freedom from local progression (FFLP) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via Kaplan Meier method.RESULTSThirty two MIEC patients received EBRT followed by MRI-based IGBT between December 2015 and August 2020. Median follow up was 19.8 months. A total of 75% of patients had FIGO stage I/II disease, 56% endometrioid histology, and 50% grade 3 disease. OS was 73.6% (95% CI 57.8%–89.3%) at 12 months and 65.8% (95% CI 48.4%–83.2%) at 24 months. FFLP was 93.8% (95% CI 85.3%–100%) at 12 months and 88.8% (95% CI 86.6%–91.0%) at 24 months. 23 (72%) patients experienced no RT-related toxicity, while 2 of 32 patients (6%) experienced late grade 3+ toxicities (grade 3 refractory vomiting; grade 5 GI bleed secondary to RT-induced proctitis).CONCLUSIONSPatients with MIEC receiving definitive EBRT followed by MRI-based IGBT prescribed to the MRI-defined HRCTV demonstrated favorable long-term local control with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

The equivalent dose contribution from high-dose-rate brachytherapy to positive pelvic lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer

PurposeDefinitive radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer involves external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. There remains controversy and practice pattern variation regarding the optimal radiation dose to metastatic pelvic lymph nodes (LNs). This study investigates the contribution of the pelvic LN dose from HDR brachytherapy.Methods and MaterialsFor 17 patients with 36 positive pelvic LNs, each LN was contoured on a computed tomography (CT) plan for EBRT and on brachytherapy planning CTs using positron emission tomographic images obtained before chemoradiation. The mean delivered dose from each plan was recorded, and an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) was calculated. A Student's t test was performed to determine if the mean delivered dose is significantly different from the mean prescribed dose and EQD2.ResultsThe average prescribed dose from the total EBRT was 54.09 Gy. The average prescribed HDR dose to International Commission on Radiation Units point A was 26.81 Gy. The average doses delivered to the involved LNs from EBRT and brachytherapy were 54.25 and 4.31 Gy, respectively, with the corresponding EQD2 of 53.45 and 4.00 Gy. There was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the mean delivered and the prescribed doses for EBRT and between the delivered dose and the EQD2 for EBRT and brachytherapy.ConclusionsOur study shows that the HDR contribution is 7% (4.00 Gy) of the total EQD2 (57.45 Gy). The HDR contribution should be accounted for when prescribing the EBRT boost dose to pelvic LNs for the optimal therapeutic dose.     

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal endometrial cancer recurrence after prior surgery and radiotherapy

PurposeCharacterize the clinical outcomes of endometrial cancer vaginal recurrences after previous surgery and radiation therapy treated with reirradiation including image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.Methods and materialsA single-institution retrospective study identifying women receiving reirradiation for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2017.ResultsTwenty-three women had vaginal recurrences of endometrial cancer, median 13.7 months (range 3.5–104.9) from initial radiation. All received reirradiation with interstitial HDR brachytherapy, and seven also received external beam radiation. Median reirradiation EQD2_10 was 48 Gy (range 24.0–68.81), and median cumulative EQD2_10 was 106.25 Gy (range 62.26–122.0). Median follow-up after reirradiation was 40.2 months (range 4.5–112.7). At 3 years, overall survival was 56%, cancer-specific survival was 61%, and disease-free survival was 46%. 14 patients experienced disease recurrence; 10 including distant sites, one at a regional node only. Three patients experienced local recurrences, two of whom did not complete the prescribed course of reirradiation. The overall crude local control rate was 87%. Three patients experienced Grade 3 vaginal toxicity. There was no bladder or rectal toxicity with Grade >2.ConclusionsReirradiation including interstitial HDR brachytherapy is a promising option for vaginal recurrences of endometrial cancer after prior radiation, with high rate of local control and acceptable toxicity. However, distant failure is common. Further studies are needed to determine cumulative radiation dose limits and the role of systemic therapy in this scenario.     

CT-based image-guided brachytherapy in uterine cervical cancer: Effect of tumor dose and volume on local control

Background and PurposeTo determine the optimal primary tumor dose for cervical cancer treatment using computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT).Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 171 patients with cervical cancer who underwent both external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and IGBT between May 2015 and December 2019. Majority of EBRT plan included central shielding technique. CT-based IGBT was performed weekly a median of three times. Magnetic resonance imaging preceded the first and third session of IGBT for target delineation.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 64 years (range: 30–91 years). The median follow-up time for living patients was 43 months (range: 6–76 months). The 3-year local control rates according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2008) stages were 89%, 100%, 92%, 89%, 78%, and 100% for stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IVA, respectively. The median EBRT dose to the central pelvis and parametrium/pelvic wall was 41.4 Gy and 50.4 Gy, respectively. Patients who received a cumulative 2 Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) (α/β = 10 Gy) of high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV) D90% ≥ 75 Gy achieved a long-term local control rate of 93%, compared with 80% in those who received <75 Gy (p = 0.02).ConclusionThis is one of the largest CT-based IGBT series examining the treatment of cervical cancer based on the tumor dose-volume relationship. An HR CTV D90% ≥75 Gy was significantly associated with favorable local control in this study.     

Variations in patterns of concurrent androgen deprivation therapy use based on dose escalation with external beam radiotherapy vs. brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer

PurposeRetrospective data suggest less benefit from androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the setting of dose-escalated definitive radiation for prostate cancer, especially when a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy approaches are used. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that patients with prostate cancer with intermediate- or high-risk disease undergoing extreme dose escalation with a brachytherapy boost are less likely to receive ADT.Methods and MaterialsData from the National Cancer Database were extracted for men aged 40–90 years diagnosed with node-negative, non-metastatic prostate cancer from 2004 to 2015. Only patients with intermediate- or high-risk disease who were treated with definitive radiotherapy were included. The association and patterns of care between dose escalated radiotherapy and ADT receipt were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsPatients with unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer were significantly less likely to receive ADT if they underwent dose escalation with a combination of EBRT and brachytherapy (odds ratio 0.67, p < 0.0001). Over time, this decrease in ADT utilization has widened for patients with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. There was no difference in ADT utilization when comparing patients treated with non–dose-escalated EBRT to those treated with dose-escalated EBRT (without brachytherapy).ConclusionIn this large national database, patients with unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer were significantly less likely to receive guideline-indicated ADT if they underwent extreme dose escalation with combined radiation modalities. As we await prospective data guiding the utility of ADT with dose escalated radiation, these findings suggest potential underutilization of ADT in patients at higher risk of advanced disease.     

Template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in gynecologic cancers: A single institutional experience

PurposeTo report the outcome and toxicities of radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer undergoing inadvertent surgery, vault cancers, and vaginal cancers at our institution.Methods and MaterialsBetween January 2000 and December 2008, 113 patients (37 patients of cervical cancer post-inadvertent surgery, 57 patients with vault cancers, and 19 patients with primary vaginal cancers) were treated with Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template brachytherapy boost after EBRT. The median EBRT dose was 50 Gy, median ISBT dose was 20 Gy, whereas median total dose was 73 Gy equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction in all three groups.ResultsMedian followup of surviving patients for the whole group was 43 months (interquartile range, 19–67 months). The 3-year actuarial disease-free survival and overall survival for three groups was 61%, 61%, 59% and 64%, 64%, and 56%, respectively. Grade III/IV rectal toxicity was seen in 11 (10%) patients, bladder toxicity in 5 (4.5%) patients, whereas 7 (6%) patients developed Grade III small bowel toxicity. Residual disease at brachytherapy had significant impact on DFS and OS. Other factors such as age, disease volume, parametrial extension, and vaginal extension did not impact the survivals.ConclusionsMartinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template–based high-dose-rate ISBT boost in gynecologic cancer results in a reasonable outcome in terms of survivals with acceptable late toxicities. The use of template-based ISBT is associated with a definite learning curve.     

National patterns of care for early-stage penile cancers in the United States: How is radiation and brachytherapy utilized?

PurposePer American Brachytherapy Society guidelines, cT1-2N0 penile cancers <4 cm in diameter are excellent candidates for curative brachytherapy. Using that criterion, we evaluated national patterns of care and predictors of use of radiation techniques using the National Cancer Database.Methods and MaterialsThe National Cancer Database was queried for men with cT1-2N0 penile cancers <4 cm in size. Comparative statistics for treatment modality were generated using bivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsAmong 1235 cases eligible for analysis, median age was 69 years. Median tumor size was 2.0 cm. 95.8% of men underwent surgery alone, with 91 (7.4%) undergoing radical penectomy, 673 (54.5%) partial penectomy, and 419 (33.9%) cosmesis-preserving surgical procedure. Only 4 (0.3%) men were treated with brachytherapy alone, 48 (3.9%) with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone, and 8 (0.6%) with EBRT after surgery. Surgical margins were positive in 118 (9.6%) patients, 14 of whom received adjuvant EBRT (11.9%) and two adjuvant brachytherapy (1.7%).There was no difference in demographic or clinical characteristics in groups treated with surgery vs. radiation (all p > 0.2). Age >70, lesions >2 cm, and T2 tumors were more likely to undergo non–organ-preserving therapy vs. radiation or a cosmesis-preserving procedure (all p < 0.05). The propensity-matched 5-year survival was not different between definitive radiation vs. surgery (61.6% vs. 62.2%, p = 0.70).ConclusionsMen with penile-preserving eligible lesions in the United States are overwhelmingly treated with surgery. Penile-preserving radiation techniques including brachytherapy and EBRT are underutilized and should be offered as curative interventions.     

Can we reduce dose to ureters as avoidance organs for MRI based brachytherapy for cervical cancer? A dosimetric feasibility study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEUreteral stenosis (US) is an underreported complication of brachytherapy (BT) for cervical cancer (CC), with limited data on toxicity risk reduction. A previous study demonstrated ureter EQD2 D0.1cc > 77 Gy correlated with US development. We sought to assess feasibility of this constraint while maintaining similar HR-CTV coverage.MATERIALS AND METHODSPatients with locally advanced CC treated with EBRT plus HDR MRI-based brachytherapy boost without hydronephrosis at diagnosis and with ureter dose EQD2 D0.1cc > 77 Gy were included. Replan was attempted to achieve HR-CTV D90 ≥ 80–85 Gy and ureter dose reduction. Ureter distance from lateral margin of HR-CTV and tandem was recorded. t-test was performed to compare ureteral dose and HR-CTV D90.RESULTsOf 25 patients were identified. Hundred percent received 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the pelvis ± paraaortic lymph nodes and 80% receiving median additional parametrial dose of 5.4 Gy. Replan meeting ureteral dose of ≤77 Gy was feasible in 18 of 25 patients, with a reduction in median ureter D0.1cc from 82.3 to 76.8 Gy (p < 0.001). Median HR-CTV D90 was similar (84.7 vs. 85.0 Gy). Replan achieved D0.1cc ≤77 Gy in 56% of patients who experienced US. All unilateral US cases occurred in the ureter closest to HR-CTV.CONCLUSIONSOptimization to reduce ureter dose to ≤77 Gy is feasible when ureters are visible and contoured. Ureters may be considered as potential OAR during MRI-based brachytherapy treatment. Reduced ring to tandem total reference air kerma (TRAK) ratio may provide an additional metric by which to lower US risk.     

Efficacy of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in patients with oral tongue carcinoma

PurposeTo evaluate the results of high-dose-rate (HDR)-interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) in oral tongue carcinomas.Methods and MaterialsBetween September 1999 and August 2007, 50 patients were treated for oral tongue carcinoma with HDR-ISBT. The patient's mean age was 58 years. Forty-two patients were in T1–2 stage and 8 patients were in T3 stage; 16 patients were in N+ stage and 34 patients in N0 stage. Exclusive ISBT was given to 17 patients (34%) in T1–2 N0 stage and complementary to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to 33 patients (66%). A perioperative technique was performed on 14 patients. The median total dose was 44 Gy when HDR was used alone (4 Gy per fraction) and 18 Gy when complementary to 50 Gy EBRT (3 Gy per fraction).ResultsThe median followup was 44 months. Actuarial disease-free survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 74%, respectively. Local failure developed in 7 patients. Actuarial local control (LC) rates were 87% and 79% at 3 and 5 years in T1–2 stage 94.5% and 91% and T3 stage 43% and 43% (with salvage surgery). Exclusive HDR cases showed LC in 100% of the cases, and the combined group (EBRT + HDR) showed LC in 80% and 69% of the cases at 3 and 5 years (p = 0.044). Soft-tissue necrosis developed in 16% and bone necrosis in 4% of the cases.ConclusionsHDR brachytherapy is an effective method for the treatment of oral tongue carcinoma in low-risk cases. Doses per fraction between 3 and 4 Gy yield LC and complication rates similar to low-dose rate. The perioperative technique promises encouraging results.     

Overall survival comparison between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) vs ADT plus EBRT with brachytherapy boost in clinically node-positive prostate cancer

PurposeOptimal therapy for clinically node-positive, nonmetastatic (cN1) prostate cancer (PC) patients remains controversial, ranging from aggressive local therapy to palliative systematic therapy alone. Despite guideline support, it is unclear if a brachytherapy (BT) boost should be considered for cN1 patients as these patients were excluded from randomized trials establishing its benefit. Herein, we compare definitive radiation therapy (RT) with or without a BT boost in cN1 PC.Methods and materialsThe National Cancer Database was used to identify men with cN1 PC treated with definitive RT and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy between 2004 and 2013. Overall survival (OS) was compared between those who received external beam RT (EBRT) or combination EBRT plus BT boost (EBRT + BT) using Kaplan–Meier with propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards.ResultsWith a median followup of 48.5 months, 1,650 patients were eligible for this analysis, 103 (6.2%) of whom received EBRT + BT. Younger age, no medical comorbidities, and Gleason score of six were associated with higher likelihood of receiving EBRT + BT over EBRT alone. The mean (median) OS for EBRT and EBRT + BT was 99.0 (110.6) months vs 109.2 (not reached) months, respectively (p = 0.048). However, no significance difference in OS was observed between the groups after propensity score matching. On multivariable analysis, EBRT + BT was not significantly associated with improved OS (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.41–1.07, p = 0.098).ConclusionsIn this retrospective, observational study of patients with cN1 PC treated with definitive RT and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy, EBRT + BT had an unadjusted improvement in OS compared with EBRT alone that lost statistical significance after multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching.