Diagnostic challenges for rapid human immunodeficiency virus assays. Performance using HIV-1 group O, HIV-1 group M, and HIV-2 samples

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the ability of seven rapid assays for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to detect antibodies in a panel of sera from individuals infected with different types and groups of HIV. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: Sixty-eight well-characterized samples, including HIV-1 group O (24), several HIV-1 group M clades (21), HIV-1/2 (10), HIV-2 (10), and samples with indeterminate results (3), were tested by the following rapid HIV assays: HIV-Spot, HIVCHEK System 3, A/Q Rapid HIV, Genie II HIV-1/HIV-2, Quix HIV-1-2-O, ImmunoComb II HIV-1+2 BiSpot, and the Serodia HIV-1+2. RESULTS: All tests successfully detected the HIV-1 group M clades and the HIV-1/2-positive samples. Of the HIV-2 stand-alone samples, four tests missed the same sample, and three tests missed another sample. Of the HIV-1 group O samples, four samples were missed by at least one test, and another sample was missed by three tests. The sensitivity of the seven rapid assays in detecting each group of sera was between 83% and 100%, with only one test having a sensitivity of 100% for all groups of sera. Three samples proved to be problematic because they were misclassified by more than one assay. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of rapid HIV assays is variable when testing sera from individuals infected with HIV-1 group O and HIV-2.     

Comparison of two rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) assays, Determine HIV-1/2 and OraQuick Advance Rapid HIV-1/2, for detection of recent HIV seroconversion

Modified protocols of two rapid tests were compared with a less sensitive (LS) (detuned) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for their abilities to distinguish recent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seroconversion from long-term infections. The results for samples from 100 HIV-positive patient that had previously been tested by the Vironostika LS EIA had a 97% concordance with the results of the Determine HIV 1/2 assay and 93% concordance with those of the OraQuick HIV 1/2 assay.     

Sensitivity and specificity of human immunodeficiency virus rapid serologic assays and testing algorithms in an antenatal clinic in Abidjan, Ivory Coast

To evaluate serologic testing algorithms for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) based on a combination of rapid assays among persons with HIV-1 (non-B subtypes) infection, HIV-2 infection, and HIV-1-HIV-2 dual infections in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, a total of 1,216 sera with known HIV serologic status were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of four rapid assays: Determine HIV-1/2, Capillus HIV-1/HIV-2, HIV-SPOT, and Genie II HIV-1/HIV-2. Two serum panels obtained from patients recently infected with HIV-1 subtypes B and non-B were also included. Based on sensitivity and specificity, three of the four rapid assays were evaluated prospectively in parallel (serum samples tested by two simultaneous rapid assays) and serial (serum samples tested by two consecutive rapid assays) testing algorithms. All assays were 100% sensitive, and specificities ranged from 99.4 to 100%. In the prospective evaluation, both the parallel and serial algorithms were 100% sensitive and specific. Our results suggest that rapid assays have high sensitivity and specificity and, when used in parallel or serial testing algorithms, yield results similar to those of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based testing strategies. HIV serodiagnosis based on rapid assays may be a valuable alternative in implementing HIV prevention and surveillance programs in areas where sophisticated laboratories are difficult to establish.     

Fine serotyping of human immunodeficiency virus serotype 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 infections by using synthetic oligopeptides representing an immunodominant domain of HIV-1 and HIV-2/simian immunodeficiency virus.

In this study, enzyme immunoassays for detection of type-specific antibodies to human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) were developed by using short peptides corresponding to sequences located within the immunodominant domain of the transmembrane glycoproteins of both HIV-1 and HIV-2-simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). The assays were highly sensitive with currently available sera from various geographical areas. Furthermore, they appeared to be more specific in HIV serotyping than the Western blot (immunoblot) assay, since all of the sera were clearly discriminated as one or the other type. It was also shown that in contrast to HIV-1, the C-terminal cysteine residue (amino acid 620, SIV from captive macaques, Mm142 strain) of the HIV-2-SIV peptide is not necessary for recognition of the peptide by antibody to HIV-2.     

Comparison of saliva and serum for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody testing in Uganda using a rapid recombinant assay.

The accuracy and acceptability of saliva human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibody testing were compared with serum testing in a study of paired specimens from HIV-1-seropositive and HIV-1-seronegative Ugandan adults attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. Saliva collection was performed with the Omni-sal device (Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Vancouver, Wash.), and antibody testing was performed by a rapid filter paper assay (Test-Pack; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.). Relative to serum testing, the sensitivity of saliva testing was 95% (195 of 205) and the specificity was 99% (295 of 297). The sensitivity of saliva testing was higher for patients with elevated levels of beta-2 microglobulin in sera and greater numbers of HIV-1-related symptoms. Pre- and poststudy interviews indicated that saliva testing did not foster inordinate fears of saliva exposure. The development of saliva tests that are inexpensive and do not require electricity is needed.     

Evaluation of the rapid immunoassay determine HIV 1/2 for detection of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2

We evaluated the reliability of a rapid human immunodeficiency virus type 1 test for quick clinical decision making, such as in needle-stick accidents. The test was evaluated with 1,160 patients. It proved to be a simple and useful test with 99.6% specificity and 99.4% sensitivity. One patient with late-stage AIDS had a false-negative result.     

合成肽抗原抗人免疫缺陷病毒1／2型抗体酶联试剂盒…

根据人免疫缺陷病毒的基因结构和氨基酸序列，采用因相法合成了ＨＩＶ－１ｇｐ４１、ｂｐ１２０、ｐ２４和ＨＩＶ－２ｇｐ３６的４条多肽，混合包被酶标板做为固相抗原，采用间接酶联免疫吸附试验，建立了检测抗－ＨＩＶ－１／２ＩｇＧ抗体的酶联诊断试剂盒。检测卫生部药品和生物制品检定所提供的４１份质控参比血清，其特异性、敏感性均为１００％，变异系数小于１０％。检测１８６份其它病种病人血清均为阴性，与华怡、巴斯德、金     

Human immunodeficiency virus antibody testing by enzyme-linked fluorescent and western blot assays using serum, gingival-crevicular transudate, and urine samples

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible utilization of saliva and urine as alternative samples to serum for the diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. A total of 302 individuals participated in the study: 187 HIV-infected individuals (106 had Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] stage II infection, 19 had CDC stage III infection, and 62 had CDC stage IV infection) and 115 noninfected persons (46 of the noninfected persons were blood donors and 69 belonged to a group at high risk of HIV infection). Paired saliva and urine samples were taken from each of the participants in the study. The presence of HIV-specific antibodies was detected by an enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA), and the result was confirmed by Western blot analysis (WB). The ELFA with saliva gave maximum sensitivity and specificity values, while ELFA had lower sensitivity (95.2%) and specificity (97. 4%) values for detection of HIV antibody in urine samples. WB with all saliva samples fulfilled the World Health Organization criterion for positivity, while only 96.8% of the urine samples were confirmed to be positive by WB. Among the four reactivity patterns found by WB of these alternative samples, the most frequent included bands against three groups of HIV structural proteins (was ENV, POL, and GAG). The reactivity bands most frequently observed were those for the proteins gp160 and gp120. The least common reactivity band was the band for protein p17. The detection of HIV antibodies in saliva samples by means of ELFA with the possibility of later confirmation by WB makes saliva an alternative to serum for possible use in the diagnosis of infection. In contrast, HIV antibody detection in urine samples by the same methodology (ELFA) could be taken into consideration for use in epidemiological studies.     

Performance of three commercial viral load assays, Versant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2, testing HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinant variants

Monitoring antiretroviral therapy requires that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viremia assays are applicable to all distinct variants. This study evaluates the performance of three commercial viral load assays—Versant HIV-1 RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2—in testing 83 plasma specimens from patients carrying HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinants previously defined by phylogenetic analysis of the pol gene. All 28 specimens from patients under treatment presented viremia values below the detection limit with the three methods. In the remaining 55 specimens from naive individuals viremia could not be detected in 32.7, 20, and 14.6% using the NucliSens, Versant, or TaqMan tests, respectively, suggesting potential viral load underestimation of some samples by all techniques. Only 32 (58.2%) samples from naive subjects were quantified by the three methods; the NucliSens test provided the highest HIV RNA values (mean, 4.87 log copies/ml), and the Versant test provided the lowest (mean, 4.16 log copies/ml). Viremia differences of greater than 1 log were seen in 8 (14.5%) of 55 specimens, occurring in 10.9, 7.3, and 5.4%, respectively, of the specimens in comparisons of Versant versus NucliSens, Versant versus TaqMan, and TaqMan versus NucliSens. Differences greater than 0.5 log, considered significant for clinicians, occurred in 45.5, 27.3, and 29% when the same assays were compared. Some HIV-1 strains, such as subtype G and CRF02_AG, showed more discrepancies in distinct quantification methods than others. In summary, an adequate design of primers and probes is needed for optimal quantitation of plasma HIV-RNA in non-B subtypes. Our data emphasize the need to use the same method for monitoring patients on therapy and also the convenience of HIV-1 subtyping.     

Differentiation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infections with HIV-2-cross-reacting antibody from mixed infections with HIV-1 and HIV-2 by serological absorption test.

The interpretation of dual seroreactivity with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 in blood samples is a serious problem facing AIDS researchers worldwide. Some samples of sera from HIV-1-infected patients showed a serological cross-reaction with HIV-2, causing confusion regarding the serodiagnosis. Therefore, we tried to differentiate these serum samples from those containing real mixed infections with both types of virus. Sera from patients with HIV-1 infections with HIV-2 cross-reacting antibody in Japan were distinguished from sera from patients with mixed infections with HIV-1 and HIV-2 in West Africa by our serological cross-absorption test, which proved to be highly specific and useful for serodiagnosis.     

Sensitivity of the Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 rapid test using samples from human immunodeficiency virus type 1-positive individuals with various levels of exposure to highly active antiretroviral therapy

The Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 rapid test detects human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gp41 antibodies, which can wane over time in some HIV-1-infected populations, resulting in false-negative screening results. Multispot sensitivity was 100% using 248 sera from one such population, and it correctly identified serostatus in individuals who previously tested false negative with rapid testing.     

合成肽抗原抗人免疫缺陷病毒1/2型抗体酶联试剂盒的研制

根据人免疫缺陷病毒（ＨＩＶ）的基因结构和氨基酸序列，采用固相法合成了ＨＩＶ－１ｇｐ４１（ＳＰ１）、ｇｐ１２０（ＳＰ２）、ｐ２４（ＳＰ３）和ＨＩＶ－２ｇｐ３６（ＳＰ４）的４条多肽，混合包被酶标板做为固相抗原，采用间接酶联免疫吸附试验（ＥＬＩＳＡ），建立了检测抗－ＨＩＶ－１／２ＩｇＧ抗体的酶联诊断试剂盒。检测卫生部药品和生物制品检定所提供的４１份质控参比血清，其特异性、敏感性均为１００％，变异系数小于１０％。检测１８６份其它病种病人血清均为阴性，与华怡、巴斯德、金豪等公司的ＨＩＶ诊断试剂比较检测了９０份ＨＩＶ感染者和１４０份正常人血清，除与华怡试剂的阴、阳性及总符合率分别为９９２９％（１３９／１４０）、９８９０％（９０／９１）和９９５７％（２２９／２３０）外，其余均为１００％。３７℃放置４天后试剂的检测结果不受影响。     

Field evaluation of a rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serial serologic testing algorithm for diagnosis and differentiation of HIV type 1 (HIV-1), HIV-2, and dual HIV-1-HIV-2 infections in West African pregnant women

We evaluated a two-rapid-test serial algorithm using the Determine and Genie II rapid assays, performed on-site in four peripheral laboratories during the French Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS) 1201/1202 Ditrame Plus cohort developed for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Côte d'Ivoire. A total of 1,039 specimens were retested by two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). The following specimens were tested: 315 specimens found on-site to be infected with HIV type 1 (HIV-1), 8 specimens found on-site to be infected with HIV-2, 71 specimens found on-site to be infected with both HIV-1 and HIV-2, 40 specimens found on-site to have indeterminate results for HIV infection, and 605 specimens taken during a quality assurance program. For HIV discrimination, 99 positive serum samples (20 with HIV-1, 8 with HIV-2, and 71 with HIV-1 and HIV-2 on the basis of our rapid test algorithm) were retested by the Peptilav test, Western blot (WB) assays, and homemade monospecific ELISAs. Real-time DNA PCRs for the detection of HIV-1 and HIV-2 were performed with peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 35 women diagnosed on-site with HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections. Compared to the results of the ELISAs, the sensitivities of the Determine and Genie II assays were 100% (95% lower limit [95% LL], 99.1%) and 99.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 98.2 to 99.9%), respectively. The specificities were 98.4% (95% CI, 96.9 to 99.3%) and 100% (95% LL, 99.3%), respectively. All serological assays gave concordant results for infections with single types. By contrast, for samples found to be infected with dual HIV types by the Genie II assay, dual reactivity was detected for only 37 samples (52.1%) by WB assays, 34 samples (47.9%) by the Peptilav assay, and 23 samples (32.4%) by the monospecific ELISAs. For specimens with dual reactivity by the Genie II assay, the rates of concordance between the real-time PCR assays and the serological assays were 25.7% for the Genie II assay, 82.9% for the Peptilav assay, 74.3% for WB assays, and 80% for the homemade ELISAs. Our algorithm provided high degrees of sensitivity and specificity comparable to those of ELISAs. Even if they are rare, women identified by the Genie II assay as being infected with HIV-1 and HIV-2 mostly appeared to be infected only with HIV-2.     

Impact of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genetic diversity on performance of four commercial viral load assays: LCx HIV RNA Quantitative, AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5, VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0, and NucliSens HIV-1 QT

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) evolution and changing strain distribution present a challenge to nucleic acid-based assays. Reliable patient monitoring of viral loads requires the detection and accurate quantification of genetically diverse HIV-1. A panel of 97 HIV-1-seropositive plasma samples collected from Cameroon, Brazil, and South Africa was used to compare the performance of four commercially available HIV RNA quantitative tests: Abbott LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay (LCx), Bayer Versant HIV-1 RNA 3.0 (bDNA), Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 (Monitor v1.5), and bioMérieux NucliSens HIV-1 QT (NucliSens). The panel included group M, group O, and recombinant viruses based on sequence analysis of gag p24, pol integrase, and env gp41. The LCx HIV assay quantified viral RNA in 97 (100%) of the samples. In comparison, bDNA, Monitor v1.5, and NucliSens quantified viral RNA in 96.9%, 94.8%, and 88.6% of the samples, respectively. The two group O specimens were quantified only by the LCx HIV assay. Analysis of nucleotide mismatches at the primer/probe binding sites for Monitor v1.5, NucliSens, and LCx assays revealed that performance characteristics reflected differences in the level of genetic conservation within the target regions.     

Predicting human immunodeficiency virus type 1-positive sera by using two enzyme immunoassay kits in a parallel testing format.

Two algorithms for screening sera for antibody to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 were compared for their efficiency in identifying a true-positive sample in a population with heterogeneous risk factors, using the criteria of specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). In the first algorithm, all sera were screened by using a single enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit, and a specificity of 98.6% and a PPV of 69.3% was calculated for true-positive sera. The second algorithm employed two different EIA kits in parallel to screen each sample. In the first instance, a specificity and a PPV of 100% was calculated if a positive sample was defined as reactive by both EIA kits; in the second, a specificity of 99.97% and a PPV of 99.4% was obtained if this criterion was extended to include a combination of one reactive and one equivocal result obtained with the two EIA kits.     

Content and design of laboratory report forms for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody testing.

In a pilot study involving proficiency testing for human immunodeficiency virus, markedly diverse and potentially confusing test report forms were encountered among participating laboratories. Therefore, a comprehensive study of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 report forms was conducted from state-licensed testing laboratories in California. Participants analyzed three serum samples of known human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody reactivity and reported their results on forms that they would normally submit to clinicians. Report forms from 84 laboratories were evaluated for content, design, and clarity. Differences were found among commercial, hospital, and public health laboratories. The significance of these findings is discussed. This technique also may be applied to evaluate laboratory report form design and content for other diagnostic test results.     

Performance and cost-effectiveness of a dual rapid assay system for screening and confirmation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 seropositivity.

Recent studies have shown that rapid, instrument-free assays for the detection of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can be as sensitive and specific as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for screening of donated blood in developing countries. Currently, however, specimens which test positive on a screening assay must still be confirmed by Western blot (immunoblot), a method which is not feasible in most developing-country laboratories. We examined whether a testing hierarchy which utilizes neither conventional ELISA nor Western blot can be reliably used for screening and confirmation of HIV infection in a high-risk population. In a retrospective analysis of 3,878 specimens which were screened for antibody to HIV in Kinshasa, Zaire, we observed that a testing hierarchy consisting of duplicate HIVCHEK screening assays followed by duplicate Serodia-HIV confirmatory assays resulted in correct confirmation of all ELISA- and Western blot-positive specimens. We conclude that such a testing hierarchy can produce highly accurate results for identification of positive specimens in routine HIV testing and provides a practical alternative to conventional methods of HIV screening and confirmation.     

Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibody by western blotting and HIV-1 DNA by PCR in patients with AIDS.

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Western blotting (immunoblotting) band patterns and the sensitivity of an HIV-1 DNA PCR assay were determined by testing the blood of patients with AIDS. Plasma and cell pellets processed from the peripheral blood of 199 patients with absolute CD4 cell counts of less than 200 cells per mm3 were tested by a licensed enzyme immunoassay (EIA; Abbott HIV-1) and Western blot assay (Cambridge-Biotech) for HIV-1 antibody. The Roache HIV-1 AMPLICOR DNA PCR assay was used to test cell pellets from 125 of the 199 patients for HIV-1 gag DNA sequences. All plasma samples from these 199 sequential patients were reactive for HIV-1 antibody by EIA and were positive by Western blot assay using the criteria recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The majority of samples (192 of 199; 96.5%) displayed at least six of nine bands characteristic of the virus by Western blotting, with the lowest number of bands characteristic of the virus displayed by any sample being three. However, 39 and 48% of all patients exhibited no bands to p17 and p55 antigens, respectively, whereas 0 to 7.5% of all patients exhibited no bands to the other antigens. HIV-1 gag DNA sequences were detected in 117 (93.6%) of 125 cell pellets processed from the peripheral blood of these same patients. All eight patients initially negative by PCR tested positive when a second pellet which had been produced from the same blood sample was tested. Despite a decrease in antibody reactivity to HIV Gag and Pol proteins, patients with advanced HIV-1 infection remained positive for HIV-1 antibody by EIA and Western blot testing. Confirmation by the HIV-1 Western blot assay still appears to be the more sensitive assay for the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection in those individuals with advanced HIV-1 infection in the United States.