螺旋CT在胃癌术前TNM分期中的应用价值

目的:探讨螺旋CT对胃癌术前TNM分期的准确性,指导临床合理地制订治疗方案和进行预后分析．方法:术前对45例胃癌患者的腹部SCT资料进行TNM分期,并与术后病理进行对照研究．结果:螺旋CT对胃癌T分期、N分期、M分期和TNM分期的准确率分别为75．6％、73．3％、 86．7％和75．6％．如以平扫CT值≥25 Hu或动脉期CT值≥70 Hu或静脉期CT值≥80 Hu为诊断阳性淋巴结标准,则阳性淋巴结的敏感性高达 98．4％,特异性为64．0％．结论:螺旋CT对胃癌的术前TNM分期可提供较高的准确率．     

A comparison of computed tomography and endorectal ultrasound in staging rectal cancer

Endorectal ultrasound was used prospectively to stage 85 patients with rectal cancer. All patients had surgical exploration and histological analysis. Demonstration of tumour, extension into perirectal fat and lymph node involvement were evaluated. Eighty-one tumours were successfully imaged by endorectal ultrasound. The results suggest that: (1) endorectal ultrasound is more accurate than CT in detecting the site of tumour; (2) endorectal ultrasound is more accurate than CT in detecting perirectal fat infiltration; (3) endorectal ultrasound is slightly more accurate than CT in detecting level II lymph node involvement.     

Radial endoscopic ultrasound and spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis and staging of periampullary tumors.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The early detection and accurate staging of pancreatic and ampullary cancer is of utmost importance for the achievement of surgical radical treatment. The aim of this study was to assess prospectively the role of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in detection and staging of pancreatic and ampullary cancer, comparing its results to those obtained with spiral computed tomography (SCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with suspected pancreatic and ampullary tumors were included, 46 (75, 4%) of whom presented with obstructive jaundice. Patients underwent EUS and SCT within a 7-day period. Examiners were unaware of the previous imaging results, except conventional echography. Image interpretation was compared to surgical and histopathological findings. RESULTS: Fifty-six (91, 8%) patients were surgically explored. Clinical follow-up and/or tissue diagnosis determined the correct diagnosis in the remaining five patients. Pancreatic cancer and ampullary cancer were observed in 29 (47, 6%) and 10 (16, 4%) patients, respectively. Chronic pancreatitis and choledocholithiasis were the most common diagnosis in patients with non-neoplastic disease. EUS was more effective than SCT for the definition of the final diagnosis in patients with obstructive jaundice (87.0 vs. 67.4%, p = 0.04). Both exams were equally effective for detecting pancreatic cancer but EUS predicted more accurately the involvement of portal-mesenteric axis by the tumor (87.0 vs. 67.4%, p = 0.04). EUS was particularly useful in the diagnosis of cancer of papilla of Vater. CONCLUSION: In patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma without unequivocal signs of distant metastatic disease, EUS is more accurate than SCT to predict venous involvement by the tumor. EUS is superior to SCT to detect ampullary adenocarcinoma. Both methods are equally ineffective to detect nodal involvement in pancreatic and ampullary cancer.     

The impact of endoscopic ultrasound findings on clinical decision making in Barrett's esophagus with high‐grade dysplasia or early esophageal adenocarcinoma

The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for staging patients with Barrett's esophagus and high‐grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) prior to endoscopic therapy is unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with HGD or IMC referred to an American medical center for endoscopic treatment between 2004 and 2010. All patients had pretreatment staging by EUS. We examined the frequency that EUS findings consistent with advanced disease (tumor invasion into the submucosa, lymph node involvement, or regional metastasis) led to a change in management. The analysis was stratified by nodularity and pre‐EUS histology. We identified one hundred thirty‐five patients with HGD (n = 106, 79%) or IMC (n = 29, 21%) had staging by EUS (79 non‐nodular, 56 nodular). Pathologic lymph nodes or metastases were not found by EUS. There were no endosonographic abnormalities noted in any patient with non‐nodular mucosa (0/79). Abnormal EUS findings were present in 8/56 patients (14%) with nodular neoplasia (five IMC, three HGD). Endoscopic mucosal resection was performed in 44 patients with a nodule, with 13% (6/44) having invasive cancer. In nodular neoplasia, the EUS and endoscopic mucosal resection were abnormal in 24% (5/21) and 40% (6/15) of those with IMC and 9% (3/35) and 0% (0/29) of those with HGD, respectively. In this study we found that EUS did not alter management in patients with non‐nodular HGD or IMC. Because the diagnostic utility of EUS in subjects with non‐nodular Barrett's esophagus is low, the value of performing endoscopic mucosal resection in this setting is questionable. For patients with nodular neoplasia, resection of the nodule with histological examination had greater utility than staging by EUS.     

The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, computed tomography, and transabdominal ultrasound in the detection and staging of primary ampullary tumors

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the accuracy between EUS (endoscopic ultrasound), ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography), CT (computed tomography), and transabdominal US (ultrasound) in the detection and staging of primary ampullary tumors. We will also try to discuss the influence of endobiliary stent on EUS in staging ampullary tumors. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-one patients with ampullary tumors were evaluated by EUS, ERCP, CT, and US before operation. The accuracy was assessed with TNM staging and compared with the surgical-pathological findings. RESULTS: EUS was superior to CT and US in detecting ampullary tumors, but EUS and ERCP are of similar sensitivity (EUS 95%, ERCP 95%, CT 19%, US 5%). EUS was superior to CT and US in T staging (EUS 75%, CT 5%, US 0%) and detecting lymph node metastasis (EUS 50%, CT 33%, US 0%) of ampullary tumors. The accuracy of EUS in T and N staging of ampullary tumors tended to be decreased in the presence of endobiliary stent (stenting: T 71%, N 75%; nonstenting T 83%, N 100%), but there was no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: EUS was superior to CT and US in assessing primary ampullary tumors, but it was not significantly superior to ERCP in detecting ampullary tumors. The presence of endobiliary stent may decrease the accuracy of EUS in staging ampullary tumors.     

EUS followed by EMR for staging of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND: Accurate staging of high-grade dysplasia and of early cancer in Barrett's esophagus is important in the selection of patients for endoscopic therapy. METHODS: Patients with Barrett's esophagus and biopsy specimen proven high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in focal nodular lesions or in endoscopically unapparent flat lesions in short-segment Barrett's esophagus were initially staged with EUS. In patients with disease limited to the mucosa on EUS, cap-assisted EMR was performed. The depth of tumor invasion on EMR specimens was classified in a similar manner to squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus: m1 (epithelial layer, dysplasia), m2 (lamina propria invasion), m3 (muscularis mucosae invasion), sm (submucosal invasion). RESULTS: EUS was performed in 48 consecutive patients (27 with focal nodular lesions and 21 with microscopic lesions), and submucosal invasion was diagnosed in 8 (confirmed in 7/8 at surgery). EMR was carried out in the remaining 40 patients without significant complications. In the 25 patients with high-grade dysplasia on prior biopsy specimens, EMR confirmed m1 disease in 19; whereas in 6 (24%), invasive adenocarcinoma was detected (to m2 in 4; to m3 in 2). In the 15 patients with invasive cancer on prior biopsy specimens and staged as intramucosal cancer on EUS, intramucosal carcinoma was confirmed in 9 (m2 in 3; m3 in 6); whereas, in 6 patients (40%), submucosal invasion was found. Overall, EUS provided accurate staging in 41/48 patients (85%) with one patient overstaged and 6 patients understaged compared with pathologic staging obtained by surgery or EMR. Of the 34 patients with m1 to m3 staging after EMR, 29 were treated endoscopically and had no evidence of cancer after a mean follow-up of 22.9 months(standard deviation 9.2 months). CONCLUSIONS: EMR provides pathologic staging information that, in addition, may be helpful after EUS if a stage-determined approach is used in the management of high-grade dysplasia and of early cancer in Barrett's esophagus. EMR may be particularly useful for staging of focal nodules or in short-segment Barrett's esophagus with microscopic lesions when endoscopic therapy is an option.     

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer

AIM:To evaluate the value of endoscopic ultrasono-graphy (EUS) in the preoperative TNM staging of gastriccancer.METHODS :Forty-one patients with gastric cancer(12 early stage and 29 advanced stage) provedby esophagogastroduodenoscopy and biopsiespreoperatively evaluated with EUS according to TNM(1997) classification of International Union ContreleCancer (UICC).Pentax EG-3630U/Hitachi EUB-525 echoendoscope with real-time ultrasound imaging linearscanning transducers (7.5 and 5.0 MHz) and Dopplerinformation was used in the current study.EUS stagingprocedures for tumor depth of invasion (T stage) wereperformed according to the widely accepted five-layerstructure of the gastric wall.All patients underwentsurgery.Diagnostic accuracy of EUS for TNM stagingof gastric cancer was determined by comparingpreoperative EUS with subsequent postoperativehistopathologic findings.RESULTS:The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS inpreoperative determination of cancer depth of invasionwas 68.3% (41128) and 83.3% (12110),60% (20112),100% (5/5),25% (4/1) for T1,T2,T3,and T4,respectively.The rates for overstaging and understagingwere 24.4% (41/10),and 7.3% (41/3),respectively.EUStended to overstage T criteria,and main reasons foroverstaging were thickening of the gastric wall due toperifocal inflammatory change,and absence of serosallayer in certain areas of the stomach.The diagnosticaccuracy of metastatic lymph node involvement or Nstaging of EUS was 100% (17/17) for NO and 41.7%(24/10) for N ,respectively,and 66% (41/27) overall. Misdiagnosing of the metastatic lymph nodes was relatedto the difficulty of distinguishing inflammatory lymphnodes from malignant lymph nodes,which imitate similarecho features.Predominant location and distribution oftumors in the stomach were in the antrum (20 patients),and the lesser curvature (17 patients),respectively.Three cases were found as surgically unresectable (T4 N ),and included as being correctly diagnosed by EUS.     

Role of computed tomography in lung cancer staging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Computed tomography has always been an important imaging technique in lung cancer staging but, due to its well-known limitations, additional imaging and/or invasive tests are usually performed. Purpose of this review is to determine whether new developments in CT and in the other staging techniques have changed the role of CT. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite important technical improvements and the availability of new CT applications, the recent literature confirms the limitations of CT in staging patients with NSCLC. Most attention was given however to other invasive and noninvasive staging techniques and their accuracy in comparison with CT. It was shown that FDG-PET is very useful in the preoperative patient with NSCLC and that it is, especially in N-staging, more accurate than CT. Also combining CT or FDG-PET with EUS-FNA biopsy seems to be a good approach in some indications. Finally, the first reports on the use of integrated PET-CT scanners in lung cancer staging were published and very promising results were shown. SUMMARY: Computed tomography stays nevertheless the routine imaging procedure for staging patients with NSCLC although performing a PET scan in addition to this CT examination seems to be a good approach that can reduce but certainly not always avoid invasive staging procedures. Mediastinoscopy is still generally considered the standard of care when tissue needs to be obtained from suspicious nodes on FDG-PET and/or CT, although minimally invasive biopsy techniques could replace to a large extent this more invasive technique in the near future.     

Barrett食管的内镜诊断进展

Barrett食管(Barrett's esophagus,BE)是食管腺癌最重要的危险因素.除目前常规内镜检查加病理活检诊断之外,近年来出现了一些新的内镜诊断技术.该文主要针对其内镜诊断及新的内镜成像技术方面作一综述.     

Preoperative staging of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector‐row computed tomography

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and multidetector‐row computed tomography (MDCT) for the locoregional staging of gastric cancer. EUS and computed tomography (CT) are valuable tools for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer. With the introduction of new therapeutic options and the recent improvements in CT technology, further evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of EUS and MDCT is needed. Methods: In total, 277 patients who underwent EUS and MDCT, followed by gastrectomy or endoscopic resection at Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University, from July 2006 to April 2008, were analyzed. The results from the preoperative EUS and MDCT were compared to the postoperative pathological findings. Results: Among the 277 patients, the overall accuracy of EUS and MDCT for T staging was 74.7% and 76.9%, respectively. Among the 141 patients with visualized primary lesions on MDCT, the overall accuracy of EUS and MDCT for T staging was 61.7% and 63.8%, respectively. The overall accuracy for N staging was 66% and 62.8%, respectively. The performance of EUS and MDCT for large lesions and lesions at the cardia and angle had significantly lower accuracy than that of other groups. For EUS, the early gastric cancer lesions with ulcerative changes had significantly lower accuracy than those without ulcerative changes. Conclusions: For the preoperative assessment of individual T and N staging in patients with gastric cancer, the accuracy of MDCT was close to that of EUS. Both EUS and MDCT are useful complementary modalities for the locoregional staging of gastric cancer.     

Transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography in preoperative staging of lower rectal adenocarcinoma

A comparison of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and computed tomography (CT) for staging of rectal carcinoma was performed. Thirty-two patients were examined by TRUS and 30 by CT. The results of these preoperative examinations were compared with postoperative histopathological findings. TRUS had an accuracy of 81% and it predicted perirectal tumor growth with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 67%, whereas the corresponding figures for CT were 52%, 67%, and 27%. These findings indicate that TRUS is more efficient than CT in staging local tumor growth in rectal cancer. Neither technique, however, can reliably identify lymph node metastases, since no correlation was found between lymph node size as observed on CT and TRUS and tumor involvement as evaluated histopathologically.