Randomized trial of salbutamol via metered-dose inhaler with spacer versus nebulizer for acute wheezing in children less than 2 years of age

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of salbutamol delivered via a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer and facial mask (MDI-S) vs. a nebulizer (NEB) for the treatment of acute exacerbations of wheezing in children. In a single-blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial, 123 outpatients (1-24 months of age), presenting with "moderate to severe" wheezing, were seen in the emergency department. Children were randomly assigned to one of two salbutamol treatment groups. In the first hour, the MDI-S group received 2 puffs (100 microg/puff) every 10 min for 5 doses, and the NEB group received 0.25 mg/kg every 13 min for 3 doses. If the clinical score was >5 at the end of the first hour, the patients received another hour of the same treatment and also betamethasone (0.5 mg/kg intramuscular). On enrollment and after the first and the second hour of treatment each child had a validated clinical score assigned by a blinded investigator. There were no differences at the time of admission to the emergency department between groups in clinical score or demographic data. Success (clinical score 0.05). We conclude that in this study population, children less than 2 years of age with moderate-severe exacerbations of wheezing responded faster to salbutamol delivered by MDI with a spacer and facial mask than to salbutamol delivered by nebulizer.     

Efficacy of inhaled steroids (beclomethasone dipropionate) for treatment of mild to moderately severe asthma in the emergency department: a randomized clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of an inhaled steroid, when added to a standard regimen of beta-agonist therapy, in the treatment of patients with mild to moderately severe asthma in the emergency department. METHODS: A convenience sample of adult patients with asthma (FEV1 % predicted 40% to 69%) presenting to the ED was randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion into 2 treatment groups. The first group received 2.5 mg nebulized salbutamol plus 1 mg (4 puffs) of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) at baseline, 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, and 4 hours, delivered by a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) attached to a spacer device (Vent-AH-aler, Glaxo). The second group was given the same salbutamol regimen plus MDI placebo through the Vent-AH-aler. The primary endpoint was improvement in FEV1 %predicted at 6 hours. RESULTS: Of 54 patients enrolled, 28 were assigned to the BDP group and 26 to the placebo group. Spirometry improved significantly in both groups over the 6 hours compared with baseline (ANOVA, P <.001). At 6 hours, the mean absolute improvement in FEV1 % predicted for BDP was 18% versus 17% for placebo (95% confidence interval for the absolute difference of 1% [-8% to 10%]). The proportion of patients in the BDP group who were hospitalized was 7% compared with 19% for patients in the placebo group (95% confidence interval for the difference of 12% [-6%, 30%]). CONCLUSION: In this group of patients with mild to moderately severe asthma, 5 mg BDP delivered by MDI during the initial 4 hours of an emergency visit was of no added benefit over standard therapy, as measured by improvement in FEV1 % predicted at 6 hours. However, a trend toward a difference in admission favoring BDP was observed. [Afilalo M, Guttman A, Colacone A, Dankoff J, Tselios C, Stern E, Wolkove N, Kreisman H: Efficacy of inhaled steroids (beclomethasone dipropionate) for treatment of mild to moderately severe asthma in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial.     

Nebulized flunisolide in infants and young children with asthma: A pilot study

The role of nebulized flunisolide solution in controlling recurrent respiratory symptoms was assessed in a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel study on 23 infants and small children (mean age, 14 2 months) with bronchial asthma. Five of the 12 children in the placebo group and 1 of the 11 patients on active treatment had to be withdrawn from the study. Flunisolide significantly improved symptom scores of wheezing and cough. The rescue treatments with salbutamol did not differ between the two groups during the study. Parents considered the active treatment effective in all the patients, while the placebo was considered useful in 4 of 7 children. No side effects were detected with either treatments. This study indicates that nebulized flunisolide may be an effective treatment for infants with recurrent wheezing and cough. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996; 21:310–315. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Comparison of the bronchodilator effects of salbutamol delivered via a metered-dose inhaler with spacer, a dry-powder inhaler, and a jet nebulizer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The aim of this study was to compare the bronchodilator effects of salbutamol delivered via three different devices: a dry-powder inhaler (DPI), a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a large-volume spacer and a jet nebulizer (NEB) in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Ten male patients with stable COPD [age: 67.2 +/- 3.8 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): 1.56 +/- 0.32 liters] were studied in a randomized, double-blind and crossover manner. Each patient received 200 or 1, 000 microg salbutamol via an MDI with an InspirEaseTM spacer, a RotahalerTM, or a DeVilbiss 646(TM) nebulizer (NEB), or matching placebo on 7 separate days. Spirometry was performed before and 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 240 min after inhalation. With the 200- microg dose, only DPI produced a small but greater response in maximum FEV1 and in area under the time-response curve (AUC-FEV1) compared with placebo. With the 1,000- microg dose, DPI and MDI produced equally greater improvements in both maximum FEV1 and AUC-FEV1 than NEB. An equal bronchodilating effect can be obtained using either DPI or MDI with a spacer device, whereas the NEB was less effective when the same dose was administered.     

Randomized controlled trial of salbutamol aerosol therapy via metered dose inhaler-spacer vs. jet nebulizer in young children with wheezing

The jet nebulizer is a common device used for administering aerosol medication in young children. However, compared to a metered dose inhaler-spacer (MDI-spacer), it takes more time and personnel. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of salbutamol aerosol therapy given via these two devices in young wheezing children. A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in children up to 5 years old who had acute wheezing and were admitted to the Department of Pediatrics, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received 2 puffs of placebo via MDI-spacer, followed by 0.15 mg/kg salbutamol respiratory solution via jet nebulizer. The second group received 2 puffs (100 microg/puff) of salbutamol via MDI-spacer, followed by placebo via jet nebulizer. Clinical scores and tidal breathing pulmonary function test were evaluated before and after treatment. Pulmonary function parameters included those derived from flow volume loops (volume to peak tidal expiratory flow over total expiratory volume, V(PTEF)/V(E); time to peak tidal expiratory flow over total expiratory time, T(PTEF)/T(E); and ratio of tidal expiratory flow at 25% remaining expiration to peak expiratory flow, 25/PF), compliance (Crs), and resistance (Rrs) of the respiratory system. The efficacy of both methods was compared by using analysis of covariance. Forty-seven wheezing children were studied (24 received salbutamol via MDI-spacer, and 23 received it via jet nebulizer). There was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding clinical scores and all pulmonary function parameters. However, heart rate was significantly increased after treatment in the jet nebulizer group when compared to those in the MDI-spacer group (P = 0.004). In conclusion, the efficacy of salbutamol aerosol therapy via MDI-spacer compared to jet nebulizer in young wheezing children was not different in terms of clinical score and postbronchodilator pulmonary function parameters. However, salbutamol aerosol therapy via jet nebulizer significantly increased the heart rate when compared to the MDI-spacer.     

Effect of different inhaled bronchodilators on recovery from methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children.

Two hundred fourteen children with mild to moderate asthma were studied to determine bronchodilator effects 5 min after administration of five different metered dose inhaler (MDI) aerosol formulations available in our country, and results were compared to placebo. Methacholine bronchial challenge was performed by the tidal breathing method, using increasing concentrations until a fall in forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) >/=20% was achieved (PC20). Immediately after FEV(1) had fallen 20% or more, children were randomly allocated into 1 of 6 groups to receive: salbutamol 200 microg (S), fenoterol 200 microg (F), salbutamol 200 microg + beclomethasone 100 microg (S + B), fenoterol 200 microg + ipratropium bromide 80 microg (F + IB), salmeterol 50 microg (SM), and placebo (P). The bronchodilator effect was determined by measuring FEV(1) 5 min after inhalation of medications. Nonparametric tests were used for statistical analysis. The six groups were similar in anthropometric and in respiratory characteristics. All five inhaled aerosols containing beta-agonists caused a significant bronchodilator effect as compared to placebo. However, the effect was significantly greater in the groups treated with F or F + IB (P < 0.05) compared to other formulations. We conclude that the five types of aerosols used in this study are able to reverse methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction 5 min after inhalation of a bronchodilator.     

Zileuton added to low-dose inhaled beclomethasone for the treatment of moderate to severe persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic effects of oral zileuton tablets combined with low-dose beclomethasone compared to doubling the dose of beclomethasone, in improving lung function and reducing asthma symptoms. METHODS: Randomized, active-control, double-blind, parallel, multi-center study of zileuton (400 or 600 mg QID)+200 microg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) BID versus placebo+BDP 400 microg BID in asthmatics with baseline FEV(1) percent predicted values between 40% and 80% following a single-blind ICS (BDP 200 microg BID) 2-week run-in. During the 3-month double-blind treatment period, assessments included safety, daytime and nighttime symptoms, acute asthma exacerbations, beta(2)-agonist use, AM and PM peak expiratory flow (PEF) and FEV(1). RESULTS: The addition of a 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) inhibitor added to a low-dose of BDP showed no significant difference in FEV(1) compared to doubling the dose of BDP. FEV(1) improved in all 3 treatment groups, with mean increases of 10% with zileuton 600 mg QID+BDP 200 microg BID, 12% with zileuton 400mg QID+BDP 200 microg BID, and 11% with BDP 400 microg BID by study end. Within each treatment group, there were significant improvements in asthma symptoms and AM and PM PEF compared to baseline. No significant differences were observed between groups with regards to salbutamol use, acute asthma exacerbations, the requirement for oral/parenteral corticosteroids and adverse clinical events. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a 5-LO inhibitor added to low-dose beclomethasone may be an alternative to higher-doses of ICS in patients unable to achieve sufficient asthma control on low-dose ICS therapy.     

Effects of salbutamol delivery from a metered dose inhaler versus jet nebulizer on dynamic lung mechanics in very preterm infants with chronic lung disease

Treatment of chronic lung disease of prematurity requires effective aerosol delivery of different therapeutic agents. Aerosols can be generated by a metered dose inhaler (MDI) or a jet nebulizer. An MDI combined with a spacer device is easier to use and avoids undesirable effects noted in conjunction with jet nebulization. We compared the clinical effectiveness of 200 μg (2 puffs) salbutamol delivered from an MDI in conjunction with a valved spacer device (Aerochamber®), and 600 μg given via jet nebulizer (PariBaby®) on 2 consecutive days, the order being randomized. Thirteen spontaneously breathing very preterm infants [mean (SD) gestational age 27.2 (1.8) weeks; birth weight 0.90 (0.34) kg] were studied at a corrected age of 37 (2.3) weeks. Mean (SD) study weight was 1.83 (0.38) kg. Dynamic lung compliance and resistance were determined from measurements of flows, volumes, and transpulmonary pressures, using a pneumotachometer and a small esophageal microtransducer catheter before and 20 min after salbutamol application. Baseline values before salbutamol administration were similar on both occasions: the mean (SD) compliance was 7.7 (3.0) mL · kPa⁻¹ · kg⁻¹ pre-MDI plus-spacer and 8.4 (3.1) pre-jet nebulizer; the resistance was 10.4 (4.0) kPa · L⁻¹ · s pre-MDI plus-spacer and 9.7 (3.4) pre-jet nebulizer. Following salbutamol, compliance did not change significantly with either MDI plus spacer or jet nebulizer. Resistance fell significantly with MDI plus spacer (mean −2.2; 99.9% CI −0.35, −4.35) and jet nebulizer (−2.4; 99% CI −0.39, −4.42). We conclude that even in small preterm infants 200 μg salbutamol via MDI plus spacer improves dynamic resistance as effectively as 600 μg via jet nebulizer and may therefore be a preferable mode of aerosol administration. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 1997; 23:442–448. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Fluticasone propionate HFA-134a pressurized metered-dose inhaler in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe asthma.

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 397 patients with moderate to severe asthma, previously treated with bronchodilators alone, received fluticasone propionate 88, 220, or 440 microg twice daily, or placebo via metered dose inhaler (MDI) for 12 weeks. Mean change from baseline to endpoint in pre-dose percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was greater (p < 0.001) in each fluticasone propionate group (9.0%, 88 microg bid; 9.8%, 220 microg bid; 11.2%, 440 microg bid) versus placebo (3.4%). Morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and supplemental albuterol use also improved in all fluticasone propionate groups versus placebo. The incidence of adverse events and 24-hour urine cortisol excretion rates were similar between active treatments and placebo.     

Inhaled corticosteroids for recurrent respiratory symptoms in preschool children in general practice: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is beneficial in patients with asthma. However, in preschool children with symptoms like cough, wheeze, or shortness of breath diagnosing asthma is difficult. Therefore, the role of ICS in the management of preschool children with recurrent respiratory symptoms is unclear. We assessed the effectiveness of ICS in preschool children with recurrent respiratory symptoms in general practice. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial, 96 children aged 1-5 years consulting their general practitioners for recurrent respiratory symptoms and in whom treatment with ICS was considered by the general practitioner were randomly allocated to receive ICS (fluticasone propionate 200 mcg/day by metered dose inhaler/spacer combination) or placebo for 6 months. Outcome assessments were carried out 1, 3, and 6 months after randomization. The primary outcome measure was the symptom score (cough, shortness of breath and wheeze during day and night) as measured by a symptom diary card. Secondary endpoints were symptom-free days, use of rescue medication, adverse events, and lung function variables as measured by the interrupter technique and forced oscillation technique. RESULTS: During the 6 months treatment period, symptoms improved in both groups, with no differences between ICS and placebo. In addition, none of the secondary outcome parameters showed differences between both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: ICS treatment has no beneficial effect in preschool children with recurrent respiratory symptoms in general practice. We therefore recommend a watchful waiting policy with only symptomatic treatment in these children. General practitioners and pediatricians should be aware of the high probability of overtreatment when prescribing ICS in these children.     

The role of domiciliary nebulizers in managing patients with severe COPD

The difficulty of assessing nebulizer responses in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been demonstrated before. This study aims to re-examine both the role of domiciliary nebulizers in COPD and also bronchodilator (BD) assessment in individuals. In a double-blind, randomized, cross-over trial, 19 stable patients with severe COPD were given the following medication 6-hourly for 2-week periods: (1) nebulized salbutamol 2.5 mg with ipratropium 0.5 mg and placebo inhalers (MDI) with spacer; (2) placebo nebules and inhaled salbutamol 400 microg with ipratropium 80 microg via MDI with spacer; (3) inhaled salbutamol 400 microg with ipratropium 80 microg via MDI with spacer (but no placebo nebulized drugs). Both nebulized and MDI drugs produced highly significant improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), specific airways conductance, 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and residual volume. There were no significant differences between BD responses obtained after active nebulized and active MDI BDs. From the diary cards, 2 weeks of active nebulized BDs produced a slightly higher median peak expiratory flow (PEF) than active MDI BDs (236 and 219 l m(-1), respectively, P=0.01) and slightly less extra inhaler use (0.8 and 1.1 puffs, respectively, P<0.05) but no significant difference in dyspnoea or quality of life (QOL) scores. There were significant correlations between domiciliary PEF and acute BD-induced changes in FVC and 6MWD, and also between domiciliary dyspnoea scores and acute changes in both total lung capacity and 6MWD. In conclusion, nebulized medication conferred little clinical advantage over the regular use of inhalers with spacers in this group of patients with severe COPD. However, acute changes in total lung capacity, FVC and 6MWD may be useful predictors of the longer-term effects of nebulized BDs in individual patients.     

Cost-effectiveness of fluticasone propionate administered via metered-dose inhaler plus babyhaler spacer in the treatment of asthma in preschool-aged children.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in children aged 12 to 47 months with asthma symptoms. DESIGN: A retrospective economic analysis conducted from the perspective of the Danish health-care system, based on clinical data from a 12-week study. SETTING: Thirty-three outpatient centers in nine countries. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirty-seven children aged 12 to 47 months with documented history of recurrent wheeze or asthma symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Two dosages of FP, 100 microg/d and 200 microg/d, and placebo administered in two divided doses via a metered-dose inhaler and a Babyhaler (Glaxo Wellcome; Middlesex, UK) spacer device. MEASUREMENTS: Effectiveness in terms of asthma exacerbations, control of cough and wheeze symptoms, symptom-free days, overall direct costs of asthma management in Danish kroner at 1999 prices, and mean and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: FP, 200 microg/d, was significantly more effective than placebo treatment in terms of the proportion of exacerbation-free patients (73.7% vs 59.8%; p = 0.025) and patients experiencing a > or = 25% improvement in cough symptoms (57.9% vs 39.0%; p = 0.018). The costs per exacerbation-free patient, per patient with a > or = 25% improvement in cough and wheeze symptoms from baseline, and per symptom-free day were lower in the FP groups than in the placebo group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for these end points indicated that the additional benefits of FP, 200 microg/d, were achieved at a lower overall cost compared with placebo treatment. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of the Danish health-care system, FP, 100 microg bid, administered via the Babyhaler inhalation device was cost-effective relative to standard therapy with bronchodilators alone.     

Effect of salbutamol on smoking related cough

Smokers have an increased prevalence of chronic cough and may complain of exacerbation of cough when attempting smoking cessation. We investigated the use of smokers cough as a model for testing anti-tussive agents. The effect of salbutamol was compared with placebo in healthy adult smokers. In a randomised double blind crossover study the effect of 400 microg salbutamol via MDI plus spacer versus placebo was studied. Cough was assessed before and after the first cigarette of the day (received at 20 minutes) and throughout the day. Cough frequency, citric acid cough challenge, change in cough symptoms and peak flow were recorded. Salbutamol reduced the mean cough frequency between 0 and 20 min. A mean of 4.5 compared to 6 on placebo (p<0.05). A significant reduction in cough followed cigarette consumption in those on placebo. Mean pre-cigarette 6 compared to 3.9 post-cigarette (p<0.02). The citric acid concentration causing two coughs (C2) at 60 min increased on salbutamol. Geometric mean 278.8 compared to 190.4 mM on placebo (p<0.03). Cough frequency is reduced in smokers following a cigarette. The reduction in cough frequency and evoked cough after salbutamol suggests that beta agonists have modest activity in smoking related cough and that smokers cough represents a sensitive model to test anti-tussive activity.     

Equivalent efficacy and safety of a new HFA-134a formulation of BDP compared with the conventional CFC in adult asthmatics.

The present study demonstrates the equivalent efficacy for BDP 500 microg bid given via MDI with the new HFA-134a propellant (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma) compared to a conventional CFC propellant (Becotide, Allen & Hanburys, UK). One hundred and sixteen adult patients with stable mild to moderate asthma (FEV1 > or = 60% of predicted normal) entered a 2-week run-in period where they maintained their own inhaled corticosteroids and were then assigned to a 12-week treatment with the test drug in a randomized, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design. Ninety-one patients completed the study period. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), use of rescue salbutamol, number of daytime and nighttime asthma attacks, number of nighttime awakenings, and clinical symptoms were recorded daily by patients on a diary card. Pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, PEFR, MEF50 and FEF25) were completed at study entry, at the start of treatment and every 2 weeks thereafter. Morning (08.00-10.00 AM) serum cortisol was measured at the start and at the end of treatment. Adverse events were collected for the total study period. Equivalence between groups was demonstrated for the primary end-point morning PEFR, as well as for evening PEFR and FEV1 (the 95% CI of the treatments' difference was within the 5% of the LSM of BDP CFC). The other secondary pulmonary function tests measured at the clinic visit showed a satisfactory asthma control, albeit without statistically significant differences between groups. Decreases in the use of rescue salbutamol and in clinical symptoms were also reported in both groups, with no differences between them. Adverse events were reported in 81.4% of patients in the BDP HFA group and in 82.5% in the CFC group. There were 73 and 59 adverse drug reactions in the two groups, respectively; the difference was mainly due to differences in taste. No drug-related serious adverse events were reported in either group. No difference was seen for morning serum cortisol between baseline and end of treatment, or between groups. In conclusion, the BDP-HFA 134a formulation proved to be statistically equivalent to the standard BDP CFC product over 12 weeks in adult patients with mild to moderate asthma.     

Plant-based formulation in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized double-blind study

BACKGROUND: A randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical study was undertaken to investigate the safety and efficacy of a plant-based formulation (DCBT1234-Lung KR), which earlier through 2 trials was found to improve FEV1 and the quality of life of COPD patients. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of DCBT1234-Lung KR was assessed using pulmonary function tests, arterial blood gas (ABG) analyses and the clinical symptoms of COPD in a 6-month study period against a matching placebo and a biomedical drug combination (salbutamol+theophylline+bromhexine). METHODS: One hundred and five subjects aged between 35 and 85 years with a smoking history of more than 20 pack years, showing little or no improvement in FEV1 upon a bronchial challenge of 200 microg of inhaled salbutamol and exhibiting ABG percentage of less than 85% of oxygen saturation were taken up for the study. The study had 3 arms viz., the plant-based formulation (DCBT1234-Lung KR), placebo and salbutamol (12 mg/day) plus theophylline (300 mg/day) plus bromhexine (24 mg/day). The end point of the study was determined as an improvement of FEV1 by 200 mL and/or increased ABG values (>90% PaO2) and clinical symptoms like dyspnoea, wheezing, cough, expectoration, disability, and sleep disturbances. RESULTS: DCBT1234-Lung KR patients showed statistically significant (95% level) improvement in FEV1 and PaO2 in comparison with salbutamol+theophylline+bromhexine and placebo patients. Twenty-three per cent of DCBT1234-Lung KR patients, 19% of salbutamol+theophylline+bromhexine group and 12% of placebo group patients showed the desired 200 mL improvement in FEV1 values in comparison with the other 2 arms. Improved PaO2 was observed in 15.4% of the DCBT1234-Lung KR patients while no improvement was seen with patients in any other arms. Symptoms like dyspnoea, wheezing, cough, expectoration, disability and sleep disturbances also significantly reduced in DCBT1234-Lung KR and the biomedical group patients, but not in the placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS: DCBT1234-Lung KR was equivalent, if not better than the present day treatment with salbutamol, theophylline and bromhexine combination in COPD patients and this was ascertained using FEV1 and ABG values.     

Therapeutic equivalence of three metered-dose inhalers containing salbutamol (Albuterol) in protecting against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma.

Many pharmaceutical companies sell salbutamol in metered-dose inhalers (MDI) for the treatment of asthma. However, the therapeutic equivalence of the more recently released generic products has not been compared with the original patented product in children. Twenty children with mild to moderate asthma, presently asymptomatic and with normal lung function, were randomly allocated to receive 200 microg of inhaled salbutamol (Albuterol) from three MDIs prepared by different manufacturers: the original Glaxo product and two generic products. The three drug formulations and placebo were given 10 min before a methacholine challenge test to determine the degree of protection provided against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction (MIB) by each salbutamol aerosol. Tests were performed on 4 consecutive days. Doubling concentrations of methacholine were inhaled until the forced expired volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) decreased by 20% from its baseline value. Compared to placebo, all patients increased significantly the provocation concentration that decreased FEV(1) by 20% (PC(20)) by more than one doubling concentration after inhaling each of the three salbutamol aerosols. The effectiveness was not significantly different between medications (P = 0.8). There was a small but significant difference among MDIs in aerosol particle size and total and fine-particle dose released per actuation. However, no relation was found between aerosol particle size or released dose and the protective effect. This study shows that the three tested brands of salbutamol MDI protected asthmatic children equally from MIB. When prescribing these salbutamol MDIs to prevent symptoms triggered by nonspecific stimuli in asthmatic children, the selection may be based on cost-benefit criteria.     

The protective effect of salbutamol inhaled using different devices on methacholine bronchoconstriction

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the protective effect of salbutamol, 100 microg, inhaled by different devices (pressurized metered-dose inhaler [pMDI; Ventolin; GlaxoWellcome; Greenford, UK], pMDI + spacer [Volumatic; GlaxoWellcome], or breath-activated pMDI [Autohaler; 3M Pharmaceuticals; St. Paul, MN]) on bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study. PATIENTS: Eighteen subjects with stable, moderate asthma, asymptomatic, receiving regular treatment with salmeterol, 50 microg bid, and inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate, 250 microg bid, in the last 6 months, with high hyperreactivity to methacholine (baseline provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) [PD(20)] geometric mean [GM], 0.071 mg). Subjects were classified into two groups: subjects with incorrect (n = 5) pMDI inhalation technique, and subjects with correct (n = 13) inhalation technique. METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: After cessation of therapy for 3 days, all subjects underwent four methacholine challenge tests, each test 1 week apart, each time 15 min after inhalation of salbutamol, 100 microg (via pMDI, pMDI + spacer, or Autohaler), or placebo. The protective effect on methacholine challenge test was evaluated as the change in the PD(20), and expressed in terms of doubling doses of methacholine in comparison with placebo treatment. RESULTS: The PD(20) was significantly higher after salbutamol inhalation than after placebo inhalation, but no significant difference was observed among the three different inhalation techniques. Only when salbutamol was inhaled via pMDI + spacer, PD(20) was slightly but not significantly higher (pMDI GM, 0.454 mg; pMDI + spacer GM, 0.559 mg; and Autohaler GM, 0.372 mg; not significant [NS]) than other inhalation techniques. Similar results (mean +/-SEM) were obtained with doubling doses of methacholine (pMDI, 2 +/- 0.47; pMDI + spacer, 3 +/- 0.35; and Autohaler, 2.4 +/- 0.40; NS). No significant difference was found among techniques when subjects with correct or incorrect inhalation technique were separately considered. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the protective effect of salbutamol, 100 microg, on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction is not affected by the different inhalation techniques, although inhalation via pMDI + spacer tends to improve the bronchoprotective ability of salbutamol. These data confirm the clinical efficacy of salbutamol, whatever the device, and the patient's inhalation technique.     

Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on cough threshold in patients with bronchial asthma

In asthmatic subjects cough can be related to the degree of airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment with high dose inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) on cough threshold in asthmatic subjects. Cough threshold to inhaled capsaicin (one breath of 10(-8)-10(-4)M solution) and to citric acid (one breath of 10(-4)-1 M), expressed as provocative concentration of two (PC2) and four coughs (PC4), was measured in 16 normal and 36 asthmatic subjects. After baseline evaluation, asthmatic subjects were randomized in two groups: (a) Group A, n=20: treated with salbutamol (200 microg t.i.d.) plus BDP (500 microg t.i.d.); (b) Group B, n=16: treated with salbutamol plus placebo in the same doses. After 1 month, cough threshold and clinical and functional evaluation were repeated. After treatment, asthmatics of group A showed a significant improvement in PC4 citric acid, in total symptom and cough scores, and in PD20FEV1 methacholine. In asthmatics of group B, treatment caused no improvement in symptoms, PD20FEV1 methacoline and cough threshold. In addition, cough threshold was not different between normal and asthmatic subjects and, in asthmatics, cough threshold did not correlate with PD20FEV1 methacholine. These data confirm that cough in asthma can be partially related to airway inflammation.     

Mometasone furoate has minimal effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis when delivered at high doses

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential for mometasone furoate (MF) to exert systemic effects following administration by dry powder inhaler (DPI) or metered-dose inhaler (MDI). DESIGN: Three randomized, evaluator-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 28-day studies. PATIENTS: Adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. INTERVENTIONS: Study 1 (12 patients per treatment group; MF DPI at 200 microg bid, 400 microg qd, 800 microg qd, or 1,200 microg qd). Study 2 (16 patients per treatment group; MF DPI at 400 microg bid or 800 microg bid, or oral prednisone at 10 mg qd). Study 3 (16 patients per treatment group; MF MDI at 400 microg bid or 800 microg bid, or fluticasone propionate [FP] at 880 microg bid by MDI). Measurements and results: Study 1. Plasma concentrations were near the lower limit of quantitation (50 pg/mL) at the MF DPI 400-microg qd dosage and approximately 250 pg/mL at the 1,200-microg qd dosage. The area under the curve for serum cortisol concentrations over 24 h (AUC(24)) was essentially unaltered at all doses. Study 2. Plasma levels over days 7 to 28 were 100.3 +/- 5.9 pg/mL (mean +/- SEM) for MF DPI 400 microg bid, and 181.0 +/- 10.9 pg/mL for 800 microg bid. Although there were relatively low levels of suppression (19 to 25%) at earlier time points for MF DPI 400 microg bid, serum cortisol AUC(24) levels at day 28 were similar to placebo. MF DPI 800 microg bid and oral prednisone both decreased serum cortisol AUC(24) levels at days 7 to 28 by 28.0 +/- 8.3% and 67.2 +/- 3.6%, respectively. The response to cosyntropin was normal in 15, 14, 11, and 1 of the patients in the placebo, MF DPI 400 microg bid, MF DPI 800 microg bid, and prednisone groups, respectively. Study 3. MF MDI caused even less systemic exposure than by DPI. MF MDI 800 microg bid (24.0 +/- 3.1%) and FP (51.7 +/- 3.8%) caused a significant decrease in serum cortisol AUC(24) on days 14 to 28. MF MDI 400 microg bid was similar to placebo treatment at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: The MF 800-microg bid dosage (1,600 microg/d), which is twice the highest projected clinical dosage, represents the lower limit for consistently detectable systemic effects of MF.     

Plant-based formulation for bronchial asthma: a controlled clinical trial to compare its efficacy with oral salbutamol and theophylline

BACKGROUND: Plant-based medicine is the 3rd most popular choice of both adults (11%) and children (6%) suffering from Asthma. While several plant-based formulations have been reported for the treatment of asthma in the past, many authors have published their reservations on clinical trials carried out using complementary and alternative medicines. OBJECTIVES: The authors desired to eliminate the shortcomings of the earlier clinical trials carried out by many investigators in a structured study. Therefore, a 12-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of a plant-based formulation (DCBT4567-Astha-15) in comparison with oral salbutamol, salbutamol + theophylline and a matching placebo in patients with reversible asthma. METHODS: Ninety-four patients between 15 and 50 years of age, showing 15% improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 15 min after a bronchial challenge of inhaled salbutamol (200 microg) were recruited, and the end point of the study was determined as a 15% improvement in FEV(1) and clinical symptoms like dyspnoea, wheezing, cough, expectoration, disability, sleep disturbances and respiration rate. RESULTS: DCBT4567-Astha-15, salbutamol and salbutamol + theophylline patients showed statistically significant improvement in FEV(1), while placebo patients did not show any improvement. Fifty percent of DCBT4567-Astha-15, 48% of salbutamol, 58% of salbutamol + theophylline and 26% of placebo patients showed the desired 15% improvement in FEV(1). Improved mean FEV(1) values at the end of the trial indicated that the salbutamol - theophylline combination was superior followed by salbutamol and DCBT4567-Astha-15. Clinical symptoms like dyspnoea, wheezing, cough, expectoration, disability, and sleep disturbances were significantly reduced in DCBT4567-Astha-15 patients compared to patients of the other three arms. CONCLUSIONS: DCBT4567-Astha-15 was as efficacious as salbutamol (12 mg/day) or salbutamol (12 mg/day) in combination with theophylline (200 mg/day) in the treatment of reversible asthmatics. Quality of life of patients also improved with DCBT4567-Astha-15 drug treatment.