In vivo dynamics of luteinizing hormone secretion and clearance in man: assessment by deconvolution mechanics

The dynamics of LH secretion and clearance were studied in vivo in eight healthy young men using a novel multiple parameter deconvolution procedure to resolve underlying secretion and clearance rates simultaneously from serial serum immunoactive LH concentrations. This deconvolution analysis disclosed random LH secretory bursts occurring at a mean (+/- SEM) interpulse interval of 72 +/- 5 min. The frequency of these secretory bursts was 6.9 +/- 0.6 episodes/8 h. Each resolved LH secretory event had an average half-duration of only 7.8 +/- 0.5 min, which was remarkably shorter than the LH concentration peak duration of 60 +/- 6 min. The maximal LH secretory rate achieved within a secretory burst averaged 0.40 +/- 0.05 mIU/min.mL (0.14 IU/min.L), which corresponded to a mass of LH released of 3.2 +/- 0.3 mIU/mL distribution vol (IU/L). By linear regression analysis, both the maximal rate and mass of LH released per secretory burst were positively correlated with the duration of the subsequent interpulse interval (P less than 0.001). In physiological experiments, the mass of LH released per secretory burst was increased by iv GnRH injections or primary gonadal failure, and decreased by sc administration of a selective GnRH antagonist (Nal,Glu-GnRH). The mean endogenous LH production rate calculated by deconvolution [180 +/- 40 mIU/min (0.18 IU/min)] was not different from a nominal value of 228 +/- 80 mIU/min (0.228 IU/min) extrapolated from earlier steady state LH infusions. Deconvolution estimated single phase half-times of endogenous LH disappearance of 87 +/- 8 min, were in general harmony with values of 44-106 min obtained previously in four LH-deficient men injected with purified LH. Moreover, creation of synthetic LH series using our deconvolution estimates yielded 24-h LH pulse profiles similar quantitatively and qualitatively to those in normal men. In summary, we applied a new multiple parameter deconvolution procedure to immunoactive LH pulse profiles to discern the nature of physiological LH secretory events and estimate endogenous LH disappearance rates. These studies in normal men have revealed that 1) LH secretory bursts occur every 72 min; their mean half-duration is 7.8 min; and 3.2 mIU/mL (3.2 IU/L) are released per secretory peak; 2) amplitudes of in vivo LH secretory bursts are augmented in primary gonadal failure and/or by exogenous GnRH injections and attenuated by a GnRH antagonist; 3) the duration of a postsecretory pause is proportional to the amplitude of the preceding LH secretory burst; and (4) 95% of total daily LH release occurs in only 5 h/day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Acute androgen receptor blockade increases luteinizing hormone secretory activity in men

To investigate the nature of androgen feedback mechanisms in normal men, we studied the hypothalamo-pituitary responses to administration of a potent, highly selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist, flutamide HCl (1 g/day, orally, for 3 days). The impact of reversible blockade of endogenous androgen action was assessed in 11 normal men by analyzing quantitative alterations in specific pulsatile properties of LH secretion basally (hypothalamic regulation) and after 2 (n = 6) consecutive iv pulses of exogenous GnRH (pituitary responsiveness). Androgen blockade resulted in significant increases in 1) 12-h mean and integrated serum immunoactive LH concentrations (P = 0.01), 2) LH pulse frequency (P = 0.01), and 3) mean interpulse (valley) serum LH concentrations (P = 0.02) and maximal LH peak heights (P = 0.01). Additionally, there were significant decreases in LH interpulse interval (P = 0.02), LH peak duration (P = 0.02), and interpeak valley duration (P = 0.02). The augmented LH pulsatility reflected enhanced hypothalamic activity, since 1) pituitary secretory responses to exogenous GnRH pulses were not altered, and 2) multiple parameter deconvolution disclosed an increased number of computer-resolved LH secretory bursts generated per 12 h, with no changes in the apparent half-duration of LH secretory impulses or the calculated mass of LH released per secretory burst. We conclude that endogenous androgens act selectively to modulate the number of spontaneous LH secretory bursts in man.     

A preponderance of circulating basic isoforms is associated with decreased plasma half-life and biological to immunological ratio of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-releasable luteinizing hormone in obese men

Hormonal abnormalities of the reproductive axis have been described in obesity. In men, extreme obesity is associated with low serum testosterone (T) and high estrogen [estrone and estradiol (E(2))] levels. As changes in the sex steroid milieu may profoundly affect the carbohydrate heterogeneity and thus some of the biological and physicochemical properties of the LH molecule, we analyzed the relative distribution of LH isoforms circulating under baseline conditions (endogenous GnRH drive) as well as the forms discharged by exogenous GnRH stimulation from putative acutely releasable and reserve pituitary pools in overweight men. Secondarily, we determined the impact of the changes in LH terminal glycosylation on the in vitro bioactivity and endogenous half-life of the gonadotropin. Seven obese subjects with body mass indexes ranging from 35.7-45.5 kg/m(2) and seven normal men with body mass indexes from 22.5-24.2 kg/m(2) underwent blood sampling at 10-min intervals for a total of 10 h before and after the iv administration of 10 and 90 microg GnRH. Basally released and exogenous GnRH-stimulated serum LH isoforms were separated by preparative chromatofocusing and identified by RIA of eluent fractions. Serum pools of successive samples collected across 2-h intervals (five serum pools per subject) containing LH released under baseline and exogenous GnRH-stimulated conditions were tested for bioactivity employing a homologous in vitro bioassay. Mean serum T and E(2) levels were significantly lower and higher, respectively, in the obese men than in the control group [serum T, 13.5 +/- 2.4 vs. 19.4 +/- 1.4 nmol/L (mean +/- SEM; P: = 0.01); serum E(2), 0.184 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.153 +/- 0.01 nmol/L (P: < 0.05)]. Mean baseline serum LH levels were similar in obese subjects and normal controls (13.3 +/- 1.3 and 12.2 +/- 1.2 IU/L). Although multiple parameter deconvolution of the exogenous GnRH-induced LH pulses revealed that the magnitude of the pituitary response in terms of secretory burst mass, secretory amplitude, and half-duration of the LH pulses was similar in obese and control subjects, the apparent endogenous half-life of LH was significantly (P: < 0.05) shorter in the obese group (98 +/- 11 min) than in the normal controls (132 +/- 10 min). Under all conditions studied, the relative abundance of basic isoforms (those with pH >/=7.0) was significantly (P: < 0.05) increased in the obese subjects compared with the controls (percentages of LH immunoactivity recovered at pH >/=7.0: obese subjects, 34-57%; normal controls, 22-46%). The biological to immunological ratio of LH released in baseline and low dose (10 microg) GnRH-stimulated conditions were similar in obese subjects and normal controls, whereas LH released by obese subjects in response to the high (90 microg) GnRH dose exhibited significantly lower ratios than those detected in normal individuals (0.62 +/- 0.07 and 0.45 +/- 0.09 vs. 1.01 +/- 0.10 and 0.81 +/- 0.09 for LH released within 10-120 min and 130-240 min after GnRH administration in obese and controls, respectively; P: < 0.05). Collectively, these results indicate that the altered sex steroid hormone milieu characteristic of extreme obesity provokes a selective increase in the release of less acidic LH isoforms, which may potentially modify the intensity and duration of the blood LH signal delivered to the gonad. Altered glycosylation of LH may therefore represent an additional mechanism modulating the hypogonadal state prevailing in morbid obesity.     

Administration of low dose pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) to GnRH-deficient men regulates free alpha-subunit secretion

Although pharmacological doses of GnRH and TRH stimulate free alpha-subunit (alpha-subunit) secretion from the pituitary, little is known about the pattern and control of alpha-subunit release under physiological circumstances. Euthyroid men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, a condition of deficient GnRH release, provide a unique opportunity to study alpha-subunit secretion before and during administration of a physiological regimen of GnRH administration. Before GnRH therapy, six euthyroid IHH men with normal endogenous TSH secretion had circulating alpha-subunit levels close to or below assay detection limits, with a mean level less than 0.5 ng/ml. During 12-42 weeks of physiological GnRH replacement, serum alpha-subunit concentrations rose to a mean value of 2.07 +/- 0.3 (+/- SEM) ng/ml (P less than 0.01). After GnRH administration, alpha-subunit was released in a pulsatile pattern following each dose of GnRH and mirrored the secretory pattern of LH. Increases in serum alpha-subunit concentrations during GnRH administration were closely correlated with increases in LH (r = 0.91; P less than 0.01), but not FSH (r = 0.24; P = NS), levels. In addition, a situation in which LH secretion was clearly predominant and FSH levels were barely detectable was created by increasing the frequency of GnRH administration to every 30 min. In this circumstance, free alpha-subunit concentrations increased in conjunction with LH levels in the face of decreased FSH levels. We conclude that replacement of GnRH regulates both the level and pattern of alpha-subunit secretion in GnRH-deficient men, and that there is tight correlation of alpha-subunit with LH, but not with FSH, secretion.     

Utility of free alpha-subunit as an alternative neuroendocrine marker of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation of the gonadotroph in the human: evidence from normal and GnRH-deficient men.

To examine the hypothesis that the secretion of free alpha-subunit (FAS) can serve as an alternative to LH as a neuroendocrine marker of gonadotroph stimulation by GnRH in euthyroid humans, we have investigated the relationship of pulsatile FAS secretion in euthyroid GnRH-deficient men (n = 10) before and after exogenous GnRH stimulation and in normal men under the influence of endogenous GnRH secretion (n = 18). Before GnRH exposure, the GnRH-deficient men showed a complete absence of both LH and FAS pulses. During the initial 7 days of GnRH exposure, all GnRH-deficient men exhibited pulsatile release of FAS by the third day, whereas the appearance of pulsatile release of LH and FSH was more variable. Long term administration of GnRH led to pulses of LH and FAS that were 100% concordant with a demonstrable dose-response relationship between GnRH and FAS, which was quantitatively similar to but more exuberant than that for LH. All doses of GnRH that produced LH pulses within the normal adult range yielded supraphysiological FAS pulses. Analysis of distribution histograms of interpulse intervals and pulse amplitudes of LH and FAS in both normal and GnRH-deficient subjects demonstrated no significant difference between these glycoproteins in interpulse intervals in either the normal or GnRH-deficient groups or in the pulse amplitudes in the GnRH-deficient subjects. There was, however, a significant difference (P less than 0.01) between the distribution histogram of LH and FAS pulse amplitudes in normal men. We conclude that the pulsatile secretion of FAS in euthyroid men 1) is determined by GnRH secretion, 2) is the initial glycoprotein to be secreted in a pulsatile fashion from the gonadotroph during early GnRH exposure in GnRH-deficient men, 3) demonstrates a dose-response relationship to exogenous GnRH which is more robust than that of LH in GnRH-deficient men receiving GnRH, and 4) can, therefore, serve as a complementary and powerful tool with LH for the study of GnRH neurosecretory dynamics.     

Bioactive follicle-stimulating hormone responses to intravenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone in boys with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

To test the hypothesis that exogenous pulsatile administration of GnRH will increase serum bioactive FSH (bFSH) levels, we studied four boys with suspected idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH). These boys presumably secreted relatively little GnRH. By virtue of their low baseline serum gonadotropin levels yet responsive pituitary gonadotrophs, these boys with IHH proved to be an excellent clinical model to test this hypothesis. Administration of GnRH (0.025 microgram/kg.dose) iv at 1- or 2-h intervals for 3-5 days resulted in an increase in serum bFSH after 91% of the GnRH doses. Serum immunoreactive FSH (iFSH) and LH (iLH) levels increased after 42% and 64% of the GnRH doses, respectively. Ninety percent of the iLH responses were concordant with bFSH responses, but only 33% of the iLH responses were concordant with iFSH responses. The serum bFSH responses occurred consistently within 20 min after GnRH administration and resulted in an increased serum bioactive to immunoreactive FSH ratio. By 60 min, serum bFSH levels had returned to preinjection levels. Serum testosterone and estradiol levels did not change during the period of GnRH administration in three of the four boys. We conclude that pulsatile, low dose iv GnRH administration in boys with IHH elicits significant serum bFSH increases by 20 min; the newly secreted FSH is preferentially enriched with increased in vitro FSH bioactivity, and it is rapidly cleared from serum (60 min). Therefore, serum bFSH measurements may provide a sensitive index of GnRH effects on the gonadotrophs.     

Pulsatile gonadotropin secretion after discontinuation of long term gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) administration in a subset of GnRH-deficient men

Normal pituitary and gonadal function can be maintained with long term pulsatile GnRH administration in men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH), and both pituitary and gonadal priming occur during the process of GnRH-induced sexual maturation. Still, the long term effects of discontinuing GnRH therapy in IHH men have not been examined. Therefore, we evaluated the patterns of gonadotropin and alpha-subunit secretion before and after a prolonged period of pulsatile GnRH administration in 10 IHH men. Before exogenous GnRH stimulation, no patient had any detectable LH pulsations. In 6 of these men, who were typical of most of our IHH patients (group I), no LH pulsations were detectable after cessation of GnRH administration. However, in the other 4 men (group II), LH pulsations were easily detectable despite cessation of exogenous GnRH stimulation, and the amplitude (9.3 +/- 3.5 IU/L) and frequency (13.8 +/- 1.7 pulses/day) of these LH pulses were similar to those in 20 normal men (10.6 +/- 0.7 IU/L and 11.0 +/- 0.7 pulses/day). Three of these 4 men in group II maintained normal serum testosterone levels after discontinuation of GnRH delivery. To determine if there were any characteristics that might be useful in predicting which IHH men could maintain normal pituitary-gonadal function after long term GnRH administration, we evaluated various clinical and hormonal parameters at the time of initial presentation. Mean alpha-subunit levels (P less than 0.01) and alpha-subunit pulse amplitude (P less than 0.02) were significantly higher in the group II than the group I men, suggesting that the group II patients had partial, rather than complete, deficiency of endogenous GnRH secretion. None of the other parameters that were assessed distinguished the two groups. We conclude that gonadotropin and sex steroid levels return to their pretreatment state in the majority of IHH men when long term GnRH administration is discontinued. Normal pituitary-gonadal function can be maintained after discontinuation of long term GnRH administration in a rare subset of IHH men who present with higher levels of alpha-subunit. We hypothesize that these latter IHH men have an incomplete GnRH deficiency and that long term exogenous GnRH administration induces pituitary and gonadal priming, which subsequently enables them to sustain normal pituitary and gonadal function in response to their own enfeebled GnRH secretion.     

Pituitary luteinizing hormone responses to intravenous and subcutaneous administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in men

Although differences in plasma GnRH concentrations have been identified after iv and sc injection of this peptide, differences in pituitary LH responses to iv and sc GnRH have not been evaluated in detail. We studied the magnitude and contour of plasma GnRH and LH responses after low doses of iv and sc GnRH administered to men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and compared them to LH pulses in normal men after endogenous GnRH secretion. Mean areas under the LH response curves differed significantly (P less than 0.01) after 25 ng/kg, but not 250 ng/kg, iv and sc GnRH doses. The mean time from basal to peak plasma LH concentrations was significantly longer with sc than iv GnRH (P less than 0.02). In addition, individual LH responses were more variable with sc GnRH. Intravenous administration produced greater GnRH amplitude (P less than 0.001) and area under the curve (P less than 0.005) and shorter time to peak (P less than 0.01) GnRH concentrations. When plasma LH responses of similar area and amplitude were compared, the contour of LH responses after iv GnRH more closely simulated the LH pulses in normal men. These data demonstrate that 1) significant differences exist in the amplitude, contour, and variability of plasma LH and GnRH pulses after iv and sc GnRH; and 2) iv GnRH elicits LH secretory episodes which closely resemble endogenous pulsations of normal men. These results suggest that iv GnRH administration may be preferred in physiological studies and, if the data can be extrapolated to women, may account for the greater success of ovulation induction reported with iv GnRH.     

Estrogen regulates the gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated secretion of biologically active luteinizing hormone

Estrogen produces time-dependent bidirectional effects on the GnRH-stimulated release of immunoactive LH in various species. To examine estrogen's regulation of biologically active LH secretion in response to pulsatile stimulation by GnRH, we studied estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women basally and during treatment with diethlystilbesterol (DES; 1 mg, orally, daily). Basal and GnRH-stimulated plasma concentrations of bioactive LH were assayed by the in vitro rat interstitial cell testosterone bioassay. GnRH-promoted LH secretory bursts in response to two consecutive stimuli were quantitated by multiple parameter deconvolution analysis. Basal half-lives of LH averaged 171 +/- 17 min (immunoactive) and 223 +/- 10 min (bioactive). Analysis of variance revealed a significant decrease in mean basal plasma bioactive LH concentrations on days 10 and 30 of DES treatment. Mean serum immunoactive LH concentrations fell similarly. DES significantly increased the half-life of immunoactive LH (days 5 and 10), but did not change that of bioactive LH. GnRH self-priming of bioactive LH secretion (increased LH secretory peak 2 compared to peak 1) was demonstrated, with a maximal value on day 10 of DES treatment. In addition, the ratio of the mass of bioactive to immunoactive LH secreted in response to the first GnRH pulse was significantly enhanced by estrogen on day 5, whereas that after the second pulse of GnRH was significantly suppressed on day 30 of DES. The self-priming action of GnRH on bioactive LH release evident in the presence of oral DES was corroborated in a separate group of six women, who were treated for 30 days with 17 beta-estradiol via an intravaginally placed Silastic ring. In conclusion, we infer that estrogen exerts a highly selective effect on the gonadotroph secretory process, such that successive GnRH stimuli result in an increase in the maximal rate and mass of secretion of biologically active LH.     

Estrogenic modulation of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated secretory activity of the gonadotrope and lactotrope in prepubertal females with Turner's syndrome

The nature of estrogen's modulation of GnRH-stimulated secretion of the female prepubertal gonadotrope and lactotrope was studied in nine girls with primary gonadal failure (Turner's syndrome; mean age, 10.0 +/- 0.25 yr). LH, FSH, and PRL release was evaluated by sampling blood every 20 min from 2000-0800 h. Hormone secretion was stimulated by one of two randomized doses of GnRH (50 or 750 ng/kg) delivered at fixed intervals of every 90 min in an attempt to replace the function of the endogenous GnRH pulse generator with an exogenous GnRH clamp. To evaluate the time dependency of estrogen action, studies were conducted at baseline and after 1 and 5 weeks of oral administration of ethinyl estradiol (EE; 100 ng/kg.day). In vivo gonadotropin secretory dynamics were quantitated by deconvolution mathematical modeling. We found a suppression of total LH secretion in response to repeated fixed doses of GnRH after 1 and 5 weeks of EE exposure, viz. a 10% (1 week) and 60% (5 weeks) reduction in the total mass of LH released after six consecutive GnRH pulses. Before estrogen exposure, patients manifested a decreasing mass of LH secreted per burst (slope of mass/burst vs. GnRH injection number was -3.3 +/- 1.44), suggesting down-regulation of the LH secretory response. However, after 5 weeks of EE treatment, the same series of GnRH doses elicited a progressive increase in the mass of LH secreted per burst (slope, 1.06 +/- 0.036; P = 0.041). Such serial amplification of LH secretory responses (despite overall suppression of the mean serum LH concentrations by EE) is consistent with the emergence of priming of GnRH actions. This phenomenon was specific, since the half-life of LH and the LH secretory burst duration were not altered. FSH responses to GnRH were significantly suppressed after 5 weeks of EE exposure (mean serum FSH concentrations, 61.9 +/- 11.4 IU/L at baseline vs. 14.4 +/- 6.9 at week 5; P = 0.003). However, in contrast to the LH responses on a given study day, there was increased FSH responsivity to successive doses of GnRH, suggesting a priming effect of serial GnRH exposure on GnRH-stimulated FSH secretion regardless of the estrogen milieu. PRL secretion was stimulated by GnRH at baseline (16.8 +/- 0.88 micrograms/L), but release was reduced at week 5 on estrogen (11.6 +/- 0.4 micrograms/L). This may represent withdrawal of the paracrine effects of endogenous GnRH and/or increased dopaminergic tone induced by estrogen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Subcutaneous administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone: absorption kinetics and gonadotropin responses

To evaluate the suitability of the sc route for the pulsatile delivery of GnRH, plasma GnRH, LH, and FSH levels were measured by RIA in five women with hypothalamic amenorrhea after sc injection of single doses of 2.5, 5, and 10 micrograms GnRH. The results were compared with those obtained after bolus iv injection of 10 micrograms GnRH. After sc injection, plasma GnRH levels rose to a dose-related maximum after 5-10 min and fell to less than 10% of the peak value by 90 min. The mean plasma disappearance half-time was 24 min (range, 18-30 min). After bolus iv injection, an initial rapid phase of disappearance (t1/2, 2.8 min) was followed by a slower phase (t1/2, 33 min), falling within the 95% confidence intervals for the disappearance half-time after sc administration (12-36 min). The patterns of LH response to sc and iv GnRH were similar, with maximum levels reached between 20 and 30 min after injection, then declining to 50-69% of the peak value by 90 min after sc injection and 61% of the peak value 90 min after iv injection. There was no significant difference between peak LH responses to 10 micrograms iv and sc doses of GnRH [15.2 +/- 2.5 (+/- SEM) vs. 13.2 +/- 2.2 IU/L]. Subcutaneous administration of three consecutive GnRH pulses at 90-min intervals to four women resulted in gonadotropin responses to each GnRH pulse. We conclude that sc GnRH administration results in pulsatile plasma GnRH and gonadotropin responses, the latter resembling those seen after iv GnRH. These results confirm the suitability of the sc route for pulsatile GnRH delivery.     

Free alpha-subunit is superior to luteinizing hormone as a marker of gonadotropin-releasing hormone despite desensitization at fast pulse frequencies

A pulsatile pattern of GnRH stimulation is essential for normal secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH), while both continuous and fast-frequency GnRH stimulation result in a paradoxical decrease in gonadotrope responsiveness known as desensitization. Under physiological conditions there is striking concordance between the pulsatile secretion of LH and the glycoprotein free alpha-subunit (FAS). The aims of this study were to determine whether the FAS response to GnRH is also decreased at fast frequencies of GnRH stimulation and whether FAS is superior to LH as a marker of GnRH secretory activity at fast-pulse frequencies. The model of GnRH-deficient men was chosen to permit precise control of the dose and frequency of GnRH stimulation of the gonadotrope. The frequency of i.v. administration of GnRH to 5 GnRH-deficient men was progressively increased from every 120 to every 60 min, from 60 to 30 min, and from 30 to 15 min during three 12-h admissions, 1 week apart. The bolus dose of GnRH remained constant and was set at that dose previously shown to produce physiological concentrations and amplitudes of LH secretion and normal testosterone levels. As the frequency of GnRH stimulation was increased, a progressive rise in mean FAS levels was noted (353 +/- 13, 448 +/- 42, 466 +/- 50, and 698 +/- 85 ng/L [mean +/- SEM] for 120, 60, 30, and 15 min intervals; P < 0.005). However, normalization of mean FAS levels to account for the increase in total GnRH delivered with increasing frequencies revealed a progressive decrease in pituitary responsiveness to each GnRH bolus with increasing frequency of stimulation (353 +/- 13, 224 +/- 21, 117 +/- 13, 87 +/- 11 ng/L; P < 0.001). The decrease in normalized mean levels was supported by a decrease in the FAS pulse amplitude with increasing frequency (517 +/- 53, 365 +/- 50, 176 +/- 29 ng/L for 120, 60, and 30 min intervals, respectively; P < 0.005). At interpulse intervals of 120 and 60 min, there was complete concordance of LH and FAS pulses in response to GnRH. However, at the 30-min frequency FAS proved to be a better marker of GnRH with a higher true positive rate and lower number of false positives than LH (P < 0.05). At all frequencies, the number of false positive pulses detected tended to be lower for FAS than for LH (P = 0.06). From these data we conclude that FAS is subject to desensitization in response to increasing frequencies of GnRH administration in GnRH-deficient men, but is superior to LH as a surrogate marker of GnRH pulse generator activity at fast pulse frequencies.     

Poorly controlled type I diabetes mellitus in young men selectively suppresses luteinizing hormone secretory burst mass

Alterations in the reproductive axis function are present to a variable extent in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Results from studies in IDDM men have yielded discrepant findings, which may reflect nonuniform patient selection criteria, age, diabetic status, duration of the disease and differences in sampling protocols. To more clearly define the impact of early diabetic alterations in the male reproductive axis, we applied a combined strategy of patient selection restricted to young men with relatively short duration of IDDM, dual control groups, multiparameter deconvolution analysis to assess LH secretory activity, and assessment of time-dependent changes in human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-stimulated serum testosterone concentrations. Three groups of subjects were studied: 11 young men with poorly controlled IDDM, 9 well controlled diabetics, and 9 healthy men. All volunteers underwent blood sampling at 10-min intervals before and after 2 consecutive iv pulses of 10 micro g GnRH. On a separate day, 40 IU/kg hCG were given im, and blood samples were collected before hCG administration, every 60 min thereafter for 6 h, and then 24, 48, and 72 h after the injection. Mean serum LH concentrations across the basal 6-h sampling period were significantly (P < 0.05) decreased in men with poorly controlled IDDM (11 +/- 1.6 IU/liter) compared with those in well controlled diabetics (19 +/- 1.8 IU/liter) and healthy controls (19 +/- 1.5 IU/liter). Multiple parameter deconvolution analysis revealed a 50% reduction in the mass of LH secreted per burst and the pulsatile LH secretion rate in poorly controlled IDDM (mass of LH secreted/burst, 7 +/- 1.1 vs. 12 +/- 2.1 and 13 +/- 1.5 IU/liter; LH secretion rate, 47 +/- 6.3 vs. 78 +/- 10 and 87 +/- 11 IU/liter.6 h; poorly controlled vs. well controlled IDDM and healthy controls, respectively; P < 0.05 for both parameters). Uncontrolled IDDM patients had significantly (P < 0.05) lower integrated serum LH concentrations after the first and second GnRH pulses (first GnRH pulse, 4460 +/- 770 vs. 7250 +/- 1200 and 5120 +/- 910 IU/liter; second pulse, 4700 +/- 615 vs. 7640 +/- 881 and 7100 +/- 1230 IU/liter; poorly controlled vs. well controlled IDDM and healthy men, respectively) and markedly attenuated LH secretory burst mass after the second GnRH stimulus (49 +/- 8.8 vs. 90 +/- 13 and 83 +/- 19 IU/liter; poorly controlled vs. well controlled IDDM and healthy controls, respectively). The biological to immunological ratio of LH released in baseline conditions was higher in uncontrolled IDDM patients (0.81 +/- 0.10) than in controlled IDDM (0.37 +/- 0.08) and healthy controls (0.48 +/- 0.06; P < 0.01), whereas LH released in response to exogenous GnRH exhibited comparable ratios among the three study cohorts. Baseline serum testosterone levels as well as absolute and incremental responses to exogenous hCG did not differ by degree of metabolic control. Collectively, these results indicate that the function of the hypothalamic-gonadotrope axis is compromised in young men with poorly controlled IDDM, such that the amplitude of spontaneous pulsatile and exogenous GnRH-stimulated LH secretion is attenuated. This central hypogonadotropism is paradoxically associated with the presence in the circulation of gonadotropin molecules with enriched biological activity, which is evidently sufficient to temporarily maintain normal total testosterone concentrations in the earlier stages of IDDM.     

Pituitary glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit secretion after thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulation in normal men and men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Although TRH stimulates the release of uncombined alpha-subunit into the circulation in patients with primary hypothyroidism, it is not clear whether alpha-subunit is released from the thyrotrophs in euthyroid subjects. We hypothesized that spontaneous fluctuations in circulating alpha-subunit released from gonadotrophs by GnRH in normal adults could obscure the detection of small changes in alpha-subunit after TRH administration. We, therefore, examined alpha-subunit responses to TRH in five euthyroid men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH), who produce little or no GnRH, five normal men, and four postmenopausal women. Mean (+/- SEM) basal serum alpha-subunit levels were significantly (P less than 0.05) less in men with IHH (0.26 +/- 0.07 microgram/L) than in the normal men (0.80 +/- 0.20 microgram/L) or postmenopausal women (3.54 +/- 0.60 microgram/L). alpha-Subunit levels rose after TRH administration in all men with IHH to a peak level of 0.86 +/- 0.25 ng/ml; TSH levels also increased from 1.9 +/- 0.4 to 13.0 +/- 5.6 mU/L. The increment in TSH and alpha-subunit levels was highly positively correlated (r = 0.96). alpha-Subunit levels also increased 2-fold in normal men given TRH, whereas alpha-subunit levels in postmenopausal women were unchanged. We conclude that thyrotrophs release alpha-subunit into the circulation in normal men and euthyroid men with IHH. Thus, both thyrotrophs and gonadotrophs appear to contribute to circulating alpha-subunit in men with IHH; however, most of the uncombined alpha-subunit in normal men appears to be from gonadotrophs.     

Graded inhibition of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion by a selective gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-receptor antagonist in healthy men: evidence that age attenuates hypothalamic GnRH outflow

Healthy older men manifest concomitant hypoandrogenemia and attenuation of LH pulse size. Because exogenous GnRH remains effective, a plausible intuition is that aging reduces hypothalamic GnRH secretion, thus mediating relative hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. To assess the impact of age on central GnRH outflow indirectly, we quantitated graded suppression of pulsatile LH secretion by saline and escalating doses of a potent and selective GnRH-receptor antagonist, ganirelix, in 18 healthy men ages 23-72 yr. The rationale is that ganirelix should reduce the amplitude of LH pulses in proportion to both drug concentration and endogenous GnRH feedforward. To this end, blood was sampled every 10 min for 2 h before and 16 h after sc administration of saline or ganirelix and for 3 additional hours after iv injection of a fixed dose of GnRH (100 ng/kg); concentrations of LH and ganirelix were measured by immunochemiluminometry and RIA, respectively; and pulsatile LH secretion was quantitated by a deconvolution procedure. Log-linear regression analysis was used to estimate the sensitivity of pulsatile LH secretion to inhibition by a unit increase in serum ganirelix concentrations in each subject. Statistical analyses revealed that increasing age markedly attenuated the capability of ganirelix to decrease LH pulse size (viz., r = -0.648; P = 0.004). In contrast, age did not modify the competitive interaction between injected GnRH and ganirelix. These joint outcomes support the clinical hypothesis that age diminishes hypothalamic GnRH outflow without impairing GnRH action in healthy men.     

Disappearance of endogenous luteinizing hormone is prolonged in postmenopausal women

Pituitary secretion of LH is increased after menopause, but it is not known whether changes in LH clearance also contribute to elevated serum levels. To determine whether the disappearance of endogenous LH is decreased in postmenopausal women (PMW), compared with normal cycling women, GnRH receptor blockade was used to inhibit endogenous secretion of LH and the glycoprotein free alpha-subunit (FAS), and the decline of serum levels was monitored. The NAL-GLU GnRH antagonist ([Ac-D-2Nal1,D-4ClPhe2, D-3Pal3,Arg5,D-4-p-methoxybenzoyl-2-aminobutyric acid6,D-Ala10]GnRH) was administered s.c., at doses of 5, 15, 50, and 150 microg/kg, to 15 euthyroid PMW in 21 studies. Blood was sampled every 10 min, for 4 h before and 8 h after a single sc injection of the GnRH antagonist, followed by hourly samples, ending at 20 h after injection. Results of the maximally suppressive doses (50 and 150 microg/kg) were compared with those of 24 normal cycling women in the early follicular phase and late follicular phase or early luteal phase, and 8 women at the midcycle surge (MCS), who also received these doses of the GnRH antagonist. The best fit curve describing the decay of hormone serum levels after maximal GnRH receptor blockade was determined by nonlinear regression analysis. The elimination of both LH and FAS, after GnRH receptor blockade, exhibited apparent first-order kinetics characterized by a single exponential phase. No differences were seen in percent suppression or half-lives (t1/2) of LH or FAS, between the 50- and 150-microg/kg antagonist doses, in any of the subject populations; and percent suppression of LH was similar across all groups. The t1/2 of LH was prolonged in PMW (139 +/- 35 min, mean +/- est. SD), in comparison with both the MCS (78 +/- 20 min; P < 0.0005) and other cycle stages (57 +/- 28 min; P < 0.0001). However, the disappearance of FAS was not different in PMW, compared with MCS or other cycle stages (t1/2 = 51 +/- 26, 41 +/- 12, and 41 +/- 19 min, respectively). Our conclusions were: 1) Disappearance of endogenous LH after GnRH receptor blockade is significantly prolonged in PMW, compared with the MCS or other cycle stages; 2) The disappearance of FAS is not altered in PMW, suggesting that differences in the disappearance of LH relate to LH microheterogeneity rather than systemic factors.     

Sex steroid control of gonadotropin secretion in the human male. I. Effects of testosterone administration in normal and gonadotropin-releasing hormone-deficient men

The precise sites of action of the negative feed-back effects of gonadal steroids in men remain unclear. To determine whether testosterone (T) administration can suppress gonadotropin secretion directly at the level of the pituitary, the pituitary responses to physiological doses of GnRH were assessed in six men with complete GnRH deficiency, whose pituitary-gonadal function had been normalized with long term pulsatile GnRH delivery, before and during a 4-day continuous T infusion (15 mg/day). Their responses were compared with the effects of identical T infusions on spontaneous gonadotropin secretion and the response to a 100-micrograms GnRH bolus in six normal men. Both groups were monitored with 15 h of frequent blood sampling before and during the last day of the T infusion. In the GnRH-deficient men, the first three GnRH doses were identical and were chosen to produce LH pulses with amplitudes in the midphysiological range of our normal men (i.e. a physiological dose), while the last four doses spanned 1.5 log orders (7.5, 25, 75, and 250 ng/kg). The 250 ng/kg dose was always administered last because it is known to be pharmacological. In the GnRH-deficient men, mean LH (P less than 0.02) and FSH (P less than 0.01) levels as well as LH pulse amplitude (P less than 0.05) decreased significantly during T infusion, demonstrating a direct pituitary-suppressive effect of T and/or its metabolites. Mean LH levels were suppressed to a greater extent in the normal than in the GnRH-deficient men (58 +/- 15% vs. 28 +/- 7%; P less than 0.05). In addition, LH frequency decreased significantly (P less than 0.01) during T administration in the normal men. These latter two findings suggest that T administration also suppresses hypothalamic GnRH release. T was unable to suppress gonadotropin secretion in one GnRH-deficient and one normal man. In both groups, the suppressive effect of T administration was present only in response to physiological doses of GnRH. Because the pituitary- and hypothalamus-suppressive effects of T could be mediated by its aromatization to estrogens, five GnRH-deficient and five normal men underwent identical T infusions with concomitant administration of the aromatase inhibitor testolactone (TL; 500 mg, orally, every 6 h). As an additional control, four GnRH-deficient and four normal men received TL alone. TL administration completely prevented the effect of T administration to suppress gonadotropin secretion in both the normal and GnRH-deficient men, and mean LH levels increased significantly in both the GnRH-deficient (P less than 0.01) and the normal (P less than 0.001) men who received TL alone. The increase in mean LH levels was greater (P less than 0.01) in the normal men who received TL alone than in the normal men who received T plus TL, thus revealing a direct effect of androgens in normal men. Measurements of T and estradiol production rates in three men demonstrated that TL effectively blocked aromatization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Aromatase inhibition in the human male reveals a hypothalamic site of estrogen feedback

The preponderance of evidence states that, in adult men, estradiol (E2) inhibits LH secretion by decreasing pulse amplitude and responsiveness to GnRH consistent with a pituitary site of action. However, this conclusion is based on studies that employed pharmacologic doses of sex steroids, used nonselective aromatase inhibitors, and/or were performed in normal (NL) men, a model in which endogenous counterregulatory adaptations to physiologic perturbations confound interpretation of the results. In addition, studies in which estrogen antagonists were administered to NL men demonstrated an increase in LH pulse frequency, suggesting a potential additional hypothalamic site of E2 feedback. To reconcile these conflicting data, we used a selective aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, to examine the impact of E2 suppression on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis in the male. Parallel studies of NL men and men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH), whose pituitary-gonadal axis had been normalized with long-term GnRH therapy, were performed to permit precise localization of the site of E2 feedback. In this so-called tandem model, a hypothalamic site of action of sex steroids can thus be inferred whenever there is a difference in the gonadotropin responses of NL and IHH men to alterations in their sex steroid milieu. A selective GnRH antagonist was also used to provide a semiquantitative estimate of endogenous GnRH secretion before and after E2 suppression. Fourteen NL men and seven IHH men were studied. In Exp 1, nine NL and seven IHH men received anastrozole (10 mg/day po x 7 days). Blood samples were drawn daily between 0800 and 1000 h in the NL men and immediately before a GnRH bolus dose in the IHH men. In Exp 2, blood was drawn (every 10 min x 12 h) from nine NL men at baseline and on day 7 of anastrozole. In a subset of five NL men, 5 microg/kg of the Nal-Glu GnRH antagonist was administered on completion of frequent blood sampling, then sampling continued every 20 min for a further 8 h. Anastrozole suppressed E2 equivalently in the NL (136 +/- 10 to 52 +/-2 pmol/L, P < 0.005) and IHH men (118 +/- 23 to 60 +/- 5 pmol/L, P < 0.005). Testosterone levels rose significantly (P < 0.005), with a mean increase of 53 +/- 6% in NL vs. 56 +/- 7% in IHH men. Despite these similar changes in sex steroids, the increase in gonadotropins was greater in NL than in IHH men (100 +/- 9 vs. 58 +/- 6% for LH, P = 0.07; and 85 +/- 6 vs. 41 +/- 4% for FSH, P < 0.002). Frequent sampling studies in the NL men demonstrated that this rise in mean LH levels, after aromatase blockade, reflected an increase in both LH pulse frequency (10.2 +/- 0.9 to 14.0 +/- 1.0 pulses/24 h, P < 0.05) and pulse amplitude (5.7 +/- 0.7 to 8.4 +/- 0.7 IU/L, P < 0.001). Percent LH inhibition after acute GnRH receptor blockade was similar at baseline and after E2 suppression (69.2 +/- 2.4 vs. 70 +/- 1.9%), suggesting that there was no change in the quantity of endogenous GnRH secreted. From these data, we conclude that in the human male, estrogen has dual sites of negative feedback, acting at the hypothalamus to decrease GnRH pulse frequency and at the pituitary to decrease responsiveness to GnRH.     

The spectrum of abnormal patterns of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion in men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: clinical and laboratory correlations

Several lines of evidence indicate that hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal activity varies among men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH). To test the hypothesis that a spectrum of abnormalities of GnRH secretion underlies the syndrome of IHH, we characterized the patterns of GnRH-induced gonadotropin secretion during periods of frequent sampling in 50 consecutive men with IHH and contrasted them with those in 20 normal men. The largest group of IHH patients (n = 42) had no detectable LH or FSH pulsations and could be categorized into 2 subsets according to the presence or absence of evidence of spontaneous puberty. The most severely affected subset (n = 32), who recalled no history of puberty, had testes with a mean volume of 3.3 +/- 0.5 (+/- SEM) ml, with a prepubertal appearance on biopsy, and often were anosmic (n = 17). The second subset of apulsatile IHH men (n = 10) had histories of partial or complete spontaneous sexual development with subsequent isolated loss of sexual function, testes with a mean volume of 13.3 +/- 1.9 ml (P less than 0.01 compared to the first subset), a pubertal or adult appearance of the testes on biopsy, and an intact sense of smell. In a second group of IHH patients (n = 3), LH was secreted predominantly in a nighttime pattern similar to that of normal children during early puberty. These men were aged 18-24 yr, had a mean testicular volume of 10.5 +/- 2.3 ml, pubertal changes on testicular biopsy, and an intact sense of smell. A third group of IHH men (n = 4) had LH pulses of abnormally low amplitude. Only one patient in this group had a history of spontaneous sexual development. The mean testicular volume of these patients was 5.6 +/- 1.9 ml, and the testes appeared prepubertal (n = 3) or pubertal (n = 1) on biopsy. In addition to these groups, another patient had apparent LH pulsations and nearly normal amplitude, but the LH was bioinactive and appeared to consist chiefly of alpha-subunit. Testing of other anterior pituitary hormone functions did not distinguish IHH men from normal men. However, those IHH patients with some evidence of endogenous GnRH secretion had higher basal and stimulated serum PRL levels than IHH men without such evidence (P less than 0.05), suggesting an influence of GnRH on PRL secretion.     

Lack of gonadotropic response to pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone in isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism associated to congenital adrenal hypoplasia

Congenital adrenal hypoplasia (AH) is a rare condition, known to be associated with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH). Three studies have reported attempts to stimulate gonadotropin secretion with pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in a total of 4 patients presenting such a syndrome, with conflicting results. In the present study, one patient with idiopathic IHH and AH was treated with pulsatile sc GnRH--doses ranging from 2.5 to 10.0 micrograms/pulse, every 90 min--during 8 weeks in an attempt to induce puberty. The prepubertal basal plasma levels of LH, FSH and testosterone, and saliva testosterone levels remained unaltered throughout treatment, at all doses of GnRH tested. The gonadotropin response to an acute iv GnRH administration (0.1 mg) also remained at the prepubertal level after pulsatile GnRH treatment. No circulating anti-GnRH antibodies were detected. The absence of gonadotropic response to exogenous pulsatile GnRH suggests that the IHH of patients with AH is due to an abnormal pituitary function rather than to a lack of endogenous GnRH.