Ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe administered with simvastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of statins, many patients do not achieve lipid targets. Combination therapy with lipid-lowering agents that act via a complementary pathway may allow additional patients to achieve recommended cholesterol goals. METHODS: After dietary stabilization, a 2- to 12-week washout period, and a 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, patients with baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or =145 mg/dl to < or =250 mg/dl and triglycerides (TG) < or =350 mg/dl were randomized to one of the following 10 groups administered daily for 12 consecutive weeks: ezetimibe 10 mg; simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg; or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was percentage reduction from baseline to end point in direct LDL-C for the pooled ezetimibe plus simvastatin groups versus pooled simvastatin groups. RESULTS: Ezetimibe plus simvastatin significantly improved LDL-C (p < 0.01), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (p = 0.03), and TG (p < 0.01) compared with simvastatin alone. Ezetimibe plus simvastatin (pooled doses) provided an incremental 13.8% LDL-C reduction, 2.4% HDL-C increase, and 7.5% TG reduction compared with pooled simvastatin alone. Coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin provided LDL-C reductions of 44% to 57%, TG reductions of 20% to 28%, and HDL-C increases of 8% to 11%, depending on the simvastatin dose. Ezetimibe 10 mg plus simvastatin 10 mg and simvastatin 80 mg alone each provided a 44% LDL-C reduction. The coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to those of simvastatin and of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: When coadministered with simvastatin, ezetimibe provided significant incremental reductions in LDL-C and TG, as well as increases in HDL-C. Coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was well tolerated and comparable to statin alone.     

Impact of hypertriglyceridemia on endothelial dysfunction during statin ± ezetimibe therapy in patients with coronary heart disease

Despite the use of statin therapy and achieving the target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, a substantial number of coronary events are not prevented, and residual risk factors remain unsettled. Recently, ezetimibe has been shown to reduce not only low-density lipoprotein cholesterol but also triglyceride (TG) levels. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of residual risk factors, mainly hypertriglyceridemia, with endothelial function during statin therapy in patients with coronary heart disease and examine the effect of ezetimibe add-on therapy. A total of 109 consecutive patients with coronary heart disease during statin therapy were enrolled. Lipid profile was measured and endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery in a fasting state. Next, 32 patients with high TG levels (≥150 mg/dl) were prospectively assigned to the ezetimibe add-on group or the no-ezetimibe group, and endothelial function was assessed after 3 months. Multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that serum TG and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were independent determinants of percentage FMD (β = -0.210 and 0.208, respectively, p <0.05). In patients with high TG levels, ezetimibe add-on therapy significantly improved percentage FMD (from 3.3 ± 1.1% to 4.0 ± 1.1%, p <0.005), whereas no significant change was observed in the no-ezetimibe group. Moreover, the improvement in percentage FMD was significantly associated with reduction in serum TG levels (β = -0.387, p <0.05) independent of the change in serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. In conclusion, hypertriglyceridemia is independently associated with endothelial dysfunction in patients with coronary heart disease during statin therapy. Ezetimibe add-on therapy improves endothelial function in these high-risk populations.     

Comparative effects on lipid levels of combination therapy with a statin and extended-release niacin or ezetimibe versus a statin alone (the COMPELL study)

International guidelines recommend lower target cholesterol levels and treatment of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and elevated triglycerides for patients at moderately high to high coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Combination therapy is often required to achieve multiple lipid treatment goals, and > or =50% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is needed in some patients to achieve aggressive LDL-C targets. In this context, we evaluated comparative effects on lipid levels of combination therapy at low to moderate doses with a statin plus extended-release niacin (niacin ER), a statin plus ezetimibe, and a highly potent statin alone. This was an open-label, multicenter, 12-week study in 292 patients (50% women) who qualified for drug therapy based on number of CHD risk factors. Patients were randomized to four parallel arms, titrated from low to moderate or high doses: atorvastatin/niacin ER, rosuvastatin/niacin ER, simvastatin/ezetimibe, or rosuvastatin alone. Baseline mean values were, for LDL-C 197 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L), HDL-C 49 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L), triglycerides 168 mg/dL (1.9 mmol/L). There were no significant differences among treatment groups in the change from baseline in LDL-C at pre-specified timepoints during treatment. All groups lowered LDL-C by approximately 50% or more (range -49 to -57%), achieving mean levels of 82-98 mg/dL (2.1-2.5 mmol/L). Changes in non-HDL-C (range -46 to -55%) mirrored those for LDL-C and did not differ among treatment groups. Statin/niacin ER combination regimens also increased HDL-C and large HDL (HDL2) and lowered triglycerides and lipoprotein (a) significantly more than other regimens. No drug-related myopathy or hepatotoxicity was observed. In this study, low to moderate dose combination therapy with a statin and niacin ER provided broad control of lipids and lipoproteins independently associated with CHD.     

Lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory effect of ezetimibe in hyperlipidemic patients with coronary artery disease

We evaluated the effects of adding ezetimibe to statin therapy in hypercholesterolemic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who could not achieve the target cholesterol levels recommended in the 2007 Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases on statin monotherapy. Ezetimibe (10 mg) was added to basal statin therapy for 12 weeks in 35 patients with hypercholesterolemia and a history of CAD who had not achieved their target cholesterol level with statin monotherapy. Changes in serum lipids, obesity markers, an oxidative stress marker, inflammatory markers, and laboratory values were investigated. Total cholesterol (from 200.6 ± 30.4 mg/dL in week 0 to 173.4 ± 33.3 mg/dL in week 12, P < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (121.3 ± 29.4 vs. 94.6 ± 30.4 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and remnant lipoprotein cholesterol (6.4 ± 3.5 vs. 5.3 ± 3.0 mg/dL, P < 0.05) all decreased significantly after addition of ezetimibe. The LDL-C/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio also decreased significantly (2.5 ± 0.8 in week 0 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7 in week 12, P < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving the target LDL-C level (<100 mg/dL) increased significantly (70.8 % in week 4 and 65.4 % in week 12, P < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the obesity or oxidative stress markers and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (an inflammatory marker). However, another inflammatory marker (tumor necrosis factor-α) was decreased significantly by ezetimibe (1.36 ± 1.06 in week 0 vs. 0.96 ± 0.24 in week 12, P = 0.042). In conclusion, when ezetimibe was added to basal statin therapy, serum lipids improved significantly and the rate of achieving the target cholesterol level increased. Thus, ezetimibe efficiently decreases LDL-C and might prevent arteriosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic patients with CAD when added to basal statin therapy.     

Is combined lipid-regulating therapy safe and feasible for the very old patients with mixed dyslipidemia?

Objectives To detect the efficacy and safety of combined lipid-regulating therapies in the very old patients with mixed dyslipidemia and determine an appropriate therapy for them. Methods Four hundred and fifty patients aged over 75 with mixed dyslipidemia were divided into five groups according to different combination therapies. Lipid levels and drug related adverse events were tested during the study. Results Total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were reduced in every group compared to baseline: statin + ezetimibe: -30.0% and -55.5%; statin + policosanol: -31.1% and -51.2%; statin + fibrates: -23.7% and -44.6%; statin + niacin: -25.2% and -43.0%; and niacin + fibrates: -11.3% and -23.5%. The target achievement rates of LDL-C all exceeded 50%, except in niacin + fibrates (42.0%); statin + ezetimibe: 57.0%; statin + policosanol: 56.0%; statin + niacin: 52.0%; and statin + fibrates: 50.0%. However, overall, the niacin + fibrates group was the most effective in decreasing triglyceride (TG) and increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as follows: niacin + fibrates: -39.3% and 28.6%; statin + fibrates: -29.3% and 18.4%; statin + niacin: -18.5% and 16.7%; statin + ezetimibe: -17.1% and 7.1%; and statin + policosanol: -15.6% and 9.5%. The achievement rates of TG and HDL-C levels in niacin + fibrates (58.0% and 39.0%) were better than the other four groups: statin + niacin (34.0% and 34.0%), statin + fibrates (43.0% and 28.0%), statin + policosanol (30.0% and 24.0%) and statin + ezetimibe (28.0% and 25.0%). Patients in all five groups experiencing drug adverse events were only 2% and no severe adverse events occurred. Conclusions Statin + ezetimibe was the most effective group in lowering TC and LDL-C levels, while niacin + fibrates was the most effective in decreasing TG and increasing HDL-C levels. The commonly used combined lipid-regulating therapies with common dosages in this study were all quite safe and feasible for the very old patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.     

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol/apolipoprotein B ratio may be a useful index that differs in statin-treated patients with and without coronary artery disease: a case control study

Low density lipoproteins (LDLs) are heterogeneous aggregations of molecules of different particle sizes, and small-size LDLs are more potent risk factors for atherosclerosis. We examined the qualitative characteristics of LDLs in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) receiving statin therapy. LDL-particle size was estimated based on the LDL-cholesterol/apolipoprotein B ratio (LDL-C/apoB) in 214 age-adjusted men receiving statin therapy. The LDL-C/apoB ratio was significantly lower in the CAD (+) group (n = 107) than in the CAD (-) group (n = 107) (median, 1.17 versus 1.19, P = 0.0095). LDL-C/apoB was significantly lower in patients with serum TG ≥ 150 mg/dL than in those with serum TG < 150 mg/dL, and in patients with serum HDL-C < 40 mg/dL than in those with serum HDL-C ≥ 40 mg/dL (1.06 versus 1.18, P = 0.012; 1.08 versus 1.22, P = 0.0023). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that elevated serum TG was an independent predictor for smaller sizes of LDLs, both in the overall subjects (β : -0.165, P = 0.02) as well as in the subset with serum LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (β : -0.252, P = 0.011). This study demonstrated that not only the absolute serum LDL-C level, but also the qualitative characteristics of LDL may be monitored for secondary prevention of CAD. Such monitoring is particularly important in patients with elevated serum TG levels, which is associated with smaller sizes of LDL-particles.     

Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin co- administered with fenofibrate in mixed hyperlipidemic patients with metabolic syndrome

Background: We compared the lipid-altering effects of ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZE/SIMVA) co-administered with fenofibrate (FENO) in mixed hyperlipidemic patients with (MetS) versus those without MetS. Methods: A total of 611 patients, 20 to 79 years old, with LDL-C 130-220 mg/dL (100-180 mg/dL for patients with type 2 diabetes [T2D]), triglycerides (TG) 150-500 mg/dL, and no history of CHD or other CHD risk equivalent disease (except for T2D), were randomized in a 1:3:3:3 ratio into one of the following four treatments for 12 weeks: placebo; EZE/SIMVA 10/20 mg; FENO 160 mg; or EZE/SIMVA+FENO. MetS status was determined in 607 patients using National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria. Percentage change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), TG, apolipoproteins A-I and B, and C-reactive protein was assessed in these patients with or without MetS. The primary objective was to evaluate the lipid-altering efficacy of EZE/SIMVA+FENO versus FENO monotherapy in the MetS versus non-MetS subgroups. Results: At baseline, patients with MetS had a higher body mass index (BMI) and TG and lower HDL-C. At Week 12, treatment with EZE/SIMVA, FENO, and EZE/SIMVA + FENO led to similar improvements in lipid parameters in patients with MetS compared to those without MetS. Treatment with EZE/SIMVA + FENO and FENO also led to an increase in LDL particle-size pattern after 12 weeks in both subgroups of patients. Conclusions: This post-hoc analysis suggested that co-administration of EZE/SIMVA+FENO had consistent benefits on the lipid profile in mixed hyperlipidemic patients with or without MetS.     

Atherosclerotic risk factors associated with cardiorespiratory fitness and BMI in adolescents

Previous research has demonstrated high prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors in adolescents; however, the associate factors related to its onset are unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study was to relate inadequate blood pressure levels, total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, LDL-C and triglycerides (TG) with different VO2máx and BMI levels in a sample of 249 adolescents, aged between 12 to 16 years old. For VO2máx prediction, the 20 meters test was used. The BMI was calculated using the body mass/heigh(2) equation. The considerate inadequate levels were: blood pressure > or =90th percentile; total cholesterol > or =150 mg/dL; LDL-C > or = 100 mg/dL, TG > or =100 mg/dL and HDL-C <45 mg/dL. Logistic regression was used as statistical procedures, with p<0.05. For the boys, significant associations were observed between the low VO2máx with TC (OR 4.33; IC=1.23-15.20) and TG (OR=4.88; IC=1.15-20.79) and between overweight and TG (OR=4.33; IC=1.42-13.21). After BMI correction, the males subjects with low VO2máx maintained their significant associations with TC (OR=5.73; IC=1.52-21.58) and TG (OR=3.81; IC=1.86-16.94). The evidences in this study suggested an inverse relationship of the cardiorespiratory fitness with TC and TG for boys, independently of the BMI.     

不同调脂方案对冠心病患者基质金属蛋白酶的影响

目的 比较冠状动脉狭窄50%～70%的冠心病人群中,40 mg阿托伐他汀与10 mg阿托伐他汀和10 mg依折麦布联合治疗的调脂作用和安伞性.探讨单用他汀治疗和联合治疗对基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)的影响.方法 选取冠状动脉狭窄50%～70%的冠心病患者42例(不置入支架),分为较大剂量阿托伐他汀(40 mg)组(单用他汀组)19例和小剂量阿托伐他汀(10 mg)联合依折麦布(10 mg)组(联合治疗组)23例.在服药前,用药4周,用药12周分别测定总胆同醇(1℃),甘油三酯,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,肝功能,肾功能,肌酸激酶,基质金属蛋白酶_2(MMP-2),基质金属蛋白酶-9(MMP-9),基质金属蛋白酶组织抑制因子-1(TIMP-1).结果 (1)单用他汀组和联合治疗组均在4周就可以明显降低患者的TC,LDL-C.12周时单用他汀组的LDL-C是(1.94±0.49)mmol/L,较前下降37.82%,联合治疗组的LDL-C是(1.92±0.54)mmol/L,较前下降38.26%,两组之间差异无统计学意义.(2)单用他汀组和联合治疗组的患者肝功能,肾功能,肌酸激酶在用药后无明显升高.(3)单用他汀组的MMP-2,MMP-9在12周时均较基线有明显降低,TiMP-1有明显升高.结论 (1)单用他汀治疗和联合治疗降脂疗效无差异.(2)两种治疗都没有引起患者肝、肾功能异常和肌酶异常.(3)40 mg阿托伐他汀治疗明显降低患者MMP-2、MMP-9,升高TIMP-1.     

Establishing the benefit of statins in low-to-moderate--risk primary prevention: the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS)

AFCAPS/TexCAPS was the first prevention trial of a statin conducted in a low-to-moderate-risk cohort that included men (> or =45 years) and women (> or =55 years) with no evidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. At study entry, LDL-C had to be 130-190 mg/dL and HDL-C < or =45 mg/dL for men and < or =47 mg/dL for women. Participants were randomized to either lovastatin 20-40 mg/day (n=3304) or placebo (n=3301) for a mean follow-up period of 5.2 years. At 1 year, in the lovastatin group TC, LDL-C, and TG were reduced by 18.4%, 25.0%, and 15%, respectively. HDL-C increased by 6.0%. At 5 years, there was a 37% decrease in the relative risk for having a first acute coronary event in the lovastatin versus placebo group. Women showed similar relative risk reduction as men. Older individuals benefited as much as younger ones from lovastatin. Subjects with > or =2 risk factors benefited more from statin than those with <2 risk factors. At baseline, HDL-C but not TC or LDL-C was determined a significant predictor of risk. On treatment, ApoB and ApoA1 were the best predictors. Based on AFCAPS/TexCAPS, a simple heuristic could be that individuals with "age plus one other risk factor" may benefit from statin therapy in primary prevention.     

Treatment with ezetimibe plus low-dose atorvastatin compared with higher-dose atorvastatin alone: is sufficient cholesterol-lowering enough to inhibit platelets?

OBJECTIVES: We sought to test the platelet inhibitory and anti-inflammatory effects of a higher statin dosage compared with combined treatment with ezetimibe plus a low statin dose. BACKGROUND: Reducing the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins induces important pleiotropic effects such as platelet inhibition. An insufficient LDL-C reduction often is treated with ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, in combination with a low statin dose. It is not known whether this combination therapy has the same pleiotropic effects as a statin monotherapy. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with coronary artery disease were assigned randomly to receive either 40 mg/day of atorvastatin or 10 mg/day of ezetimibe plus 10 mg/day of atorvastatin for 4 weeks. The levels of LDL-C, platelet activation markers after stimulation, platelet aggregation, and plasma chemokine levels (i.e., regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted [RANTES]) were measured before and after changing lipid-lowering medication. RESULTS: Platelet activation markers (P-selectin) after stimulation (adenosine diphosphate) were reduced by 40 mg/day of atorvastatin (-5.2 +/- 1.6 arbitrary units) but not by ezetimibe plus low-dose atorvastatin (2.1 +/- 1.8 arbitrary units; p < 0.005) despite a similar reduction of LDL-C (atorvastatin -1.01 +/- 0.18 mmol/l vs. ezetimibe plus atorvastatin -1.36 +/- 0.22 mmol/l, p = NS). Thrombin receptor-activating peptide-induced platelet aggregation as well as plasma RANTES levels were reduced by 40 mg/day of atorvastatin but not by ezetimibe plus low-dose atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet reactivity and a proinflammatory chemokine were reduced more by the higher atorvastatin dose than by ezetimibe plus low-dose atorvastatin. In patients with coronary artery disease, it might be important to combine ezetimibe with higher statin dosages to benefit from cholesterol-independent pleiotropic effects.     

高龄老年混合型高脂血症患者联合调脂治疗的临床特点

目的探讨高龄老年混合型高脂血症患者联合调脂治疗的临床特点。方法选择我院接受联合调脂治疗的混合型高脂血症患者340例,根据年龄分为对照组140例(65～79岁),试验组200例(≥80岁)。常用联合调脂方案为烟酸+贝特、他汀+烟酸、他汀+贝特、他汀+多廿烷醇和他汀+依折麦布。观察2组患者用药前后TG、TC、LDL-C及HDL-C变化及不良反应情况。结果所有入选患者均表现为混合型高脂血症;试验组与对照组5种方案治疗后,方案烟酸+贝特降低TG和升高HDL-C幅度明显优于其他方案;他汀+烟酸、他汀+贝特、他汀+多廿烷醇和他汀+依折麦布降低TC、LDL-C水平明显优于烟酸+贝特(P<0.05,P<0.01)。试验组与对照组各方案疗效及治疗前后肝肾功能和肌酸激酶水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论老年常用联合调脂方案主要有5类;烟酸+贝特降低TG及升高HDL-C的作用明显优于其他方案,其他4种方案降低TC、LDL-C水平均有较好疗效;各联合调脂方案对老年患者同样疗效确切,且安全性良好。     

急性冠状动脉综合征患者应用依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀治疗的临床研究

目的:观察依折麦布联合阿托伐他汀对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者血脂及心脏事件的影响,并对其安全性评价。方法:回顾性分析北京安贞医院2010年1月至2010年12月间,住院的ACS患者236例,其中应用依折麦布(10 mg/d)联合阿托伐他汀(10 mg/d)治疗的患者81例(A组),应用阿托伐他汀(20 mg/d)治疗的患者155例(B组),治疗8 w后,比较两组患者治疗前后hs-CRP、LDL-C、TC、TG及HDL-C的变化,心脏事件以及不良反应发生率。结果:两组患者基线资料、治疗期间腹胀等不良反应及病死率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗8w后,A组hs-CRP、LDL-C、TC值、再发心绞痛及再发心肌梗死比例显著低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对ACS患者联合应用阿托伐他汀与依折麦布显著降低hs-CRP、LDL-C、TC水平及心脏事件发生率,且不增加不良反应,安全有效。     

Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe 10 mg administered with pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: After dietary stabilization, 2-12 week screening/washout period, and 4-week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, 538 patients with baseline LDL-C > or =3.8 to < or =6.5 mmol/l and TG < or =4.0 mmol/l were randomized to one of eight possible treatments administered daily for 12 weeks: ezetimibe 10mg; pravastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg; ezetimibe 10 mg plus pravastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg; or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent reduction in LDL-C from baseline to study endpoint for ezetimibe 10 mg plus pravastatin (pooled doses) compared to pravastatin alone (pooled doses) and ezetimibe alone. The combined use of ezetimibe and pravastatin resulted in significant incremental reductions in LDL-C and TG compared to pooled pravastatin alone (p<0.01). Coadministration therapy reduced LDL-C by 34-41%, TG by 21-23%, and increased HDL-C by 7.8-8.4%, depending on the dose of pravastatin. The combined regimen was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to pravastatin alone and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: When coadministered with pravastatin, ezetimibe provided significant incremental reductions in LDL-C and TG and was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to pravastatin alone.     

Efficacy and safety of high-dose pravastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients with well-compensated chronic liver disease: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial

The hepatotoxic potential of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in patients with underlying chronic liver disease remains controversial. We performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial that compared pravastatin (80 mg) to a placebo administered once daily to hypercholesterolemic subjects greater than 18 years of age with at least a 6-month history of compensated chronic liver disease and with a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level greater than or equal to 100 mg/dL and a triglyceride (TG) level lower than 400 mg/dL. The efficacy was determined by the percentage change in LDL-C [along with the total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and TG] from the baseline to week 12. The safety was analyzed by the proportion of subjects who developed at least 1 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value greater than or equal to 2 times the upper limit of normal for those with normal ALT at the baseline or a doubling of the baseline ALT for those with elevated ALT at the baseline during 36 weeks of treatment. A total of 630 subjects were screened, and 326 subjects were randomized; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease was present in 64%, and chronic hepatitis C was present in 23%. In the intent-to-treat population, pravastatin (80 mg/day) significantly lowered the mean LDL-C, TC, and TG values at week 12 and at other times (weeks 4, 8, 24, and 36) in comparison with the placebo. The incidence of subjects who met the primary prespecified ALT event definition was lower in the pravastatin group at all times over the 36 weeks of therapy in comparison with the placebo group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No differences were seen on the basis of the baseline ALT values or among the different liver disease groups. CONCLUSION: High-dose pravastatin (80 mg/day) administered to hypercholesterolemic subjects with chronic liver disease significantly lowered LDL-C, TC, and TGs in comparison with the placebo and was safe and well tolerated. The concern over an increased potential for statin-induced hepatotoxicity in patients with chronic liver disease appears to be lessened on the basis of these results.     

Apolipoprotein E genotype affects the response to lipid-lowering therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotype on baseline lipid levels and the response to hydroxy-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We consecutively recruited Chinese patients with type 2 DM requiring lipid-lowering therapy according to current guidelines. Patients were started on either simvastatin 10 mg daily or given an equivalent dose of lovastatin 20 mg. After 12 weeks of statin therapy, patients had fasting lipid profiles repeated. ApoE genotyping was performed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were studied. The epsilon3/epsilon3 genotype was in 62.5%, epsilon2/epsilon3 and epsilon3/epsilon4, 16.7 and 20.8%, respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables, baseline total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were significantly higher in those with epsilon3/epsilon4 compared with epsilon2/epsilon3 genotype (6.7 vs. 5.5 mm for TC, 4.5 vs. 3.6 mm for LDL-C; p = 0.015 and p = 0.025, respectively). With statin therapy, epsilon3/epsilon4 patients had significantly greater LDL-C lowering compared with epsilon2/epsilon3 patients (48 vs. 27.7%; p = 0.04). There was no gender difference in baseline lipid parameters or response to statin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: ApoE genotype accounts for interindividual variability of baseline cholesterol levels, and response to statin therapy in Chinese patients with type 2 DM.     

Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe added to ongoing statin therapy for treatment of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

Ezetimibe is a lipid-lowering drug that inhibits the intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol by blocking passage across the intestinal wall. The efficacy and safety of adding ezetimibe to ongoing statin therapy in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The study group included 769 adults (aged > or =18 years) with primary hypercholesterolemia who had not achieved National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel II goals with dietary alteration and statin monotherapy. Patients receiving a stable dose of a statin for > or =6 weeks were randomized to receive concurrent treatment with placebo (n = 390) or ezetimibe (n = 379), 10 mg/day, in addition to continuing their open-label statin for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the percent change in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline with statin monotherapy to end point after intervention (secondary variables: high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol and triglycerides). Ongoing statin therapy plus ezetimibe led to changes of -25.1% for LDL cholesterol (HDL cholesterol +2.7%; triglycerides -14.0%) compared with LDL cholesterol -3.7% (p <0.001), HDL cholesterol +1.0% (p <0.05), and triglycerides -2.9% (p <0.001) for placebo added to ongoing statin therapy. Among patients not at LDL cholesterol goal at on-statin baseline, 71.5% receiving statin plus ezetimibe versus 18.9% receiving statin plus placebo reached goal at end point (odds ratio 23.7; p <0.001). The co-administration of statin and ezetimibe was generally well tolerated. Adding ezetimibe to ongoing statin therapy led to substantial additional reduction in LDL cholesterol levels, facilitating attainment of NCEP goals. Ezetimibe offers a new therapeutic option for patients receiving statins who require further reduction in LDL cholesterol.     

Projected coronary heart disease risk benefit with ezetimibe

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and total cholesterol (TC) are the primary clinical parameters of interest for any cholesterol intervention. Clinicians are interested in how the reduction of these lipid parameters as well as increases in high density lipoprotein (HDL) relate to changes in coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. The objective of this analysis was to estimate the additional CHD risk reduction that could potentially be provided by co-administration of ezetimibe with statin therapy. Data from four double-blind placebo controlled clinical trials were used to predict the level of CHD risk reduction that might be achieved by co-administration of ezetimibe with statin therapy when compared to those receiving statin as monotherapy. Patients without a previous history of CHD were included in the analysis. Projected CHD risk reduction was calculated as percent change in projected CHD risk from baseline to 12 weeks based on observed lipid levels at those time points. For all the studies combined greater reductions in percent change in 5-year CHD risk were observed for patients receiving ezetimibe and statin as co-therapy, 53.4%, when compared to those receiving statin alone, 39.7%. Co-administration of ezetimibe with statin therapy provides an additional 13.7% reduction in predicted 5-year CHD risk when compared to statin monotherapy. Reductions in 5-year CHD risk for each of the statin studies ranged from 16.1% for lovastatin to 9.8% for atorvastatin. Co-administration of ezetimibe with statins could significantly reduce CHD events in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.     

Identification and Treatment of Women with Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Women with genetic hypercholesterolemias, including familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), are at greatly increased lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease. All women with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL after a trial of lifestyle therapy should receive statin therapy. Aggressive risk factor control and complete avoidance of tobacco exposure are required in order to minimize the excess risk conferred by hypercholesterolemia. Most women with FH require high-intensity statin therapy to achieve a >50% LDL-C reduction for long-term prevention of cardiovascular events. Before starting statins, fibrates, niacin, or ezetimibe, women with FH should be counseled on the potential for birth defects and to discontinue these drugs at least 1–2 months prior to stopping contraception. Cholesterol-lowering drugs can be resumed once pregnancy and lactation are completed. All women should have a fasting lipid panel performed by age 20 years. The children and other first-degree relatives of women with LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL should be screened for FH.     

Effects of aggressive versus conventional lipid-lowering therapy by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the effects of aggressive and conventional lipid lowering by two different dosages of the same statin on early human atherosclerotic lesions using serial noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). BACKGROUND: Regression of atherosclerotic lesions by lipid-lowering therapy has been reported. METHODS: Using a double-blind design, newly diagnosed hypercholesterolemic patients (n = 51) with asymptomatic aortic and/or carotid atherosclerotic plaques were randomized to 20 mg/day (n = 29) or 80 mg/day (n = 22) simvastatin. Mean follow-up was 18.1 months. A total of 93 aortic and 57 carotid plaques were detected and sequentially followed up by MRI every six months after lipid-lowering initiation. The primary MRI end point was change in vessel wall area (VWA) as a surrogate for atherosclerotic burden. RESULTS: Both statin doses reduced significantly total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) versus baseline (p < 0.001). Total cholesterol decreased by 26% versus 33% and LDL-C by 36% versus 46% in the conventional (20 mg) versus aggressive (80 mg) simvastatin groups, respectively. Although the simvastatin 80-mg group had significantly higher baseline TC and LDL-C levels, both groups reached similar absolute values after treatment. A significant reduction in VWA was already observed by 12 months. No difference on vascular effects was detected between the randomized doses. Post-hoc analysis showed that patients reaching mean on-treatment LDL-C < or = 100 mg/dl had larger decreases in plaque size. CONCLUSIONS: Effective and protracted lipid-lowering therapy with simvastatin is associated with a significant regression of atherosclerotic lesions. No difference in vessel wall changes was seen between high and conventional doses of simvastatin. Changes in vessel wall parameters are more related to LDL-C reduction rather than to the dose of statin.