某岛礁驻岛人员不同年龄阶段疾病谱分析

目的 调查某岛礁驻岛人员不同年龄阶段疾病谱的特点,为做好岛礁医疗保障工作提供依据。方法 于某岛礁医院提取2016年10月—2017年5月患者病历资料,按年龄分为4组,各组所有病例按《ICD-10疾病诊断名称及代码目录》规定的疾病名称进行记录并归类,统计各年龄阶段各系统疾病的发病例数及记录各组排名前10位的具体疾病,并行统计学分析。结果 不同年龄阶段各系统性疾病发病比例差异比较有统计学意义（P<0.05）;各年龄段排名前10位的疾病构成不同。结论 岛礁不同年龄段人群其具体疾病发生各有不同,各系统性疾病发病情况亦各有不同,故根据不同年龄阶段,采取针对性的医疗保障,非常必要。     

Quality of Documentation of Contrast Agent Allergies in Electronic Health Records

PurposeTo describe and appraise contrast agent allergy documentation in the electronic health record (EHR).MethodsWe systematically identified medical imaging drugs and class terms in an integrated EHR allergy repository for patients seen at a large health care system between 2000 and 2013. Structured and free-text contrast allergy records were normalized and categorized by inciting agent and nature of adverse reaction. Allergen records were evaluated by their level of specificity. Reaction records were evaluated by whether the reaction was known or unknown and whether known reactions would be categorized as allergic-like or physiologic.ResultsAmong 2.7 million patients, we identified 36,144 patients (1.3%) with at least one of 40,669 contrast allergy records associated with 49,000 reactions. Contrast allergens were more likely than other allergens to be entered as free text (15.2% versus 6.3%; odds ratio 2.69, 95% confidence interval 2.61-2.76). There were 1,305 unique contrast allergen records, which we grouped into 141 concepts. Most contrast allergen records were ambiguous contrast concepts (69.1%), rather than imaging modality-specific class terms (19.4%) or specific contrast agents (11.5%). Contrast reactions were occasionally entered as free text (24.8%), which together with structured entries were grouped into 183 concepts. A known reaction was documented in 71.8% of cases; however, 12.2% were non-allergic-like reactions.ConclusionContrast allergy records in EHRs are diverse and commonly low quality. Continued EHR enhancements and training are needed to support contrast allergy documentation to facilitate improved patient care and medical research.     

The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football: an analysis of ankle sprains

AIM: To conduct a detailed analysis of ankle sprains sustained in English professional football over two competitive seasons. METHODS: Club medical staff at 91 professional football clubs annotated player injuries. A specific injury audit questionnaire was used together with a weekly form that documented each club's current injury status. RESULTS: Completed injury records for the two competitive seasons were obtained from 87% and 76% of the participating clubs. Ankle ligament sprains accounted for 11% of the total injuries over the two seasons, with over three quarters (77%) of sprains involving the lateral ligament complex. A total of 12 138 days and 2033 matches were missed because of ankle sprains. More sprains were caused by contact mechanisms than non-contact mechanisms (59% v 39%) except in goalkeepers who sustained more non-contact sprains (21% v 79%, p<0.01). Ankle sprains were most often observed during tackles (54%). More ankle sprains were sustained in matches than in training (66% v 33%), with nearly half (48%) observed during the last third of each half of matches. A total of 44% of sprains occurred during the first three months of the season. A high number of players (32%) who sustained ankle sprains were wearing some form of external support. The recurrence rate for ankle sprains was 9% (see methodology for definition of reinjury). CONCLUSION: Ankle ligament sprains are common in football usually involving the lateral ligament complex. The high rate of occurrence and recurrence indicates that prevention is of paramount importance.     

Outcome analysis of patients with normal compression US examinations

Prior studies have documented the accuracy of compression ultrasound (US) for use in evaluating patients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremity. A normal compression US examination is considered indicative of no thrombotic disease, and anticoagulant therapy is withheld. There are no long-term data supporting treatment decisions based solely on normal compression US results. The authors undertook a long-term (8-33-month) review of 1,111 normal compression US examinations performed on 1,022 patients. Outcome analysis obtained through review of imaging records, inpatient charts, and death certificates failed to document sequelae of untreated DVT in all but five patients with negative examinations. Three patients again presented with clinical symptoms of DVT that were subsequently documented with compression US, and two patients reportedly died of pulmonary embolism with no documentation of DVT several months after the initial negative study. Because of the clinical acceptance of this test and the subsequent increased demand for its use, compression US has quadrupled the yearly detection rate of DVT at the authors' institution. With the results of prior controlled studies and this favorable outcome analysis study, compression US is recommended as the diagnostic modality of choice for suspected DVT.     

Impact of MRI technique on clinical decision-making in patients with liver iron overload: comparison of FerriScan- versus R2*-derived liver iron concentration

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical decision-making in iron overload patients using FerriScan and an R2*-based approach. One-hundred and six patients were imaged at two consecutive timepoints (454 ± 158 days) on a 1.5-T Siemens MAGNETOM Avanto Fit scanner. For both timepoints, patients underwent the standard FerriScan MRI protocol. During the second exam, each patient additionally underwent R2*-MRI mapping. For each patient, a retrospective (simulated) decision was made to increase, decrease, or maintain chelator levels. Two different decision models were considered: The fixed threshold model assumed that chelator adjustments are based strictly on fixed liver iron concentration (LIC) thresholds. Decisions made with this model depend only on the most recent LIC value and do not require any clinician input. The second model utilized decisions made by two hematologists retrospectively based on trends between two consecutive LIC values. Agreement (κA) between hematologists (i.e., interobserver variability) was compared with the agreement (κB) between a single hematologist using the two different LIC techniques. Good agreement between R2*- and FerriScan-derived decisions was achieved for the fixed threshold model. True positive/negative rates were greater than 80%, and false positive/negative rates were less than 10%. ROC analysis yielded areas under the curve greater than 0.95. In the second model, the agreement in clinical decision-making for the two scenarios (κA vs. κB) was equal at the 95% confidence level. Switching to R2*-based LIC estimation from FerriScan has the same level of agreement in patient management decisions as does switching from one hematologist to another. • Good agreement between R2*- and FerriScan-derived decisions in liver iron overload patient management • Switching to R2*-based LIC estimation from FerriScan has the same level of agreement in patient management decisions as does switching from one hematologist to another.     

Behandlungsassoziierte Spätfolgen nach Strahlentherapie maligner Erkrankungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiogenic late effects in children and adolescents have been evaluated retrospectively in most analyses, with small patient numbers. The German Group of Pediatric Radiation Oncology (APRO) has generated a concept for a prospective evaluation of radiation-associated late effects in childhood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a nationwide central database for the documentation of radiation parameters and side effects of all children treated within therapy protocols of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology (GPOH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A study center has been implemented in Muenster, the documentation has started in July 2001 in few centers in a pilot phase. Since February 2004 the documentation is done countrywide. Detailed documentation forms have been designed for treatment parameters and for doses applied at organs at risk. Furthermore, a uniform toxicity documentation, according to the RTOG/EORTC criteria, was chosen. Patients were reported from the study centers of the GPOH to the study center. All information was collected and analyzed in the study center. RESULTS: Till July 31, 2005, 438 documentations of radiation and 579 toxicity documentations of side effects have been collected in the study center. 46 centers for radiotherapy in Germany and one center each in Austria and in Switzerland took part in the documentation. The quality of documentation regarding completeness and plausibility fulfilled the expected criteria in most cases. This feasibility analysis showed that important information about organ dose levels and side effects was documented in a large number of patients (Figures 1 and 2). CONCLUSION: This prospective evaluation of radiotherapy and radiogenic side effects in children and adolescents will allow correlating doses at organs at risk and the incidence of acute and late sequelae in Germany. Further documentations and a longer follow-up are necessary to obtain powerful results.     

Acceptance testing of radiologic systems: experience in testing 129 imaging systems at two major medical facilities.

The problems encountered in acceptance testing of newly installed imaging equipment at two major medical institutions over a 10-year period are presented. Acceptance tests were conducted in 129 newly installed imaging systems with conventional acceptance testing methods. A total of 1,132 problems were documented. Problems were classified as major or minor; there were 772 major problems and 360 minor problems. An average of six major and three minor problems were documented in each new equipment installation tested. In some instances, final payment was withheld for several months or more to ensure correction of the problems identified. This experience confirms the need of thorough acceptance testing of new imaging equipment before final payment is made to the vendor.     

MR-safety in clinical practice at 7T: Evaluation of a multistep screening process in 1819 subjects

IntroductionMR facilities must implement and maintain adequate screening and safety procedures to ensure safety during MR examinations. The aim of this study was to evaluate a multi-step MR safety screening process used at a 7T facility regarding incidence of different types of safety risks detected during the safety procedure.MethodsSubjects scheduled for an MR examination and having entered the 7T facility during 2016–2019 underwent a pre-defined multi-step MR safety screening process. Screening documentation of 1819 included subjects was reviewed, and risks identified during the different screening steps were compiled. These data were also related to documented decisions made by a 7T MR safety committee and reported MR safety incidents.ResultsPassive or active implants (n = 315) were identified in a screening form and/or an additional documented interview in 305 subjects. Additional information not previously self-reported by the subject, regarding implants necessitating safety decisions performed by the staff was revealed in the documented interview in 102 subjects (106 items). In total, the 7T MR safety committee documented a decision in 36 (2%) of the included subjects. All of these subjects were finally cleared for scanning.ConclusionA multi-step screening process allows a thorough MR screening of subjects, avoiding safety incidents. Different steps in the process allow awareness to rise and items to be detected that were missed in earlier steps.Implications for practiceSafety questions posed at a single timepoint during an MR screening process might not reveal all safety risks. Repetition and rephrasing of screening questions leads to increased detection of safety risks. This could be effectively mitigated by a multi-step screening process. A multi-disciplinary safety committee is efficient at short notice responding to unexpected safety issues.     

Todesfeststellung und Reanimationsabbruch im Notarztdienst

Background

Emergency physicians and ambulance personnel are regularly confronted with critical and closely linked problems in resuscitation, termination of resuscitation and confirmation of death. Decisions for or against resuscitation, on abortion of resuscitation and confirmation of death belong to a fringe area of medicine, which also includes medicolegal aspects.

Objective

The aim of the study was to ascertain which criteria are used in emergency medical services to determine when death has occurred or when resuscitation attempts are terminated and how the documentation of the diagnosis and the treatment decisions is carried out.

Material and methods

Data were obtained from the files of the district attorneys office I in Munich concerning unnatural and unexplained fatalities in the period from January to October 2015.

Results

In the majority of cases death was correctly determined by sure signs of death; however, in a relatively large number of cases no certain signs of death were documented in detail. In the justification for termination of resuscitation measures it was noticeable that the duration of resuscitation was frequently given but was precisely documented in only approximately half of the cases. It was also frequently not documented whether sure signs of death appeared after termination of resuscitation attempts. In association with advance patient directives, the constellations of neglected measures and justifications found are in need of substantial improvement.

Conclusion

Within the framework of this retrospective study several problematic aspects were uncovered, which from a prospective viewpoint should be handled better in the emergency medical services. They affect the importance of early bystander resuscitation to reduce the interval prior to treatment, the necessity for improvement in documentation of sure signs of death and handling of advance patient directives.

     

Inadequacies of repeated radiological examinations in a university hospital

Purpose: To establish why 16% of 1,045 patients undergoing abdominal and/or vascular surgery referred to the University Department of Radiology for a B-image sonogram reported that a US of the same regions of the body had been conducted during the previous 6 weeks without any changes in the clinical status.Statement of the problem: Evaluation of the reasons for these superfluous examinations and analysis of the consequences that the US follow-up examinations implied for the patient.Material and Methods: One senior resident radiologist and one senior resident surgeon reviewed the medical records of the patients reporting previous examinations and examinations scheduled at the time of the questioning of the patients.Results: One hundred and eight (63%) of the 171 medical records were available. Data on previous examinations mentioned in the report forms were incorrect in 14 cases (13%). Therefore, further evaluations were based on 94 patients. Ten (8%) out of 121 sonograms, 4 (10%) out of 40 CT and 2 (20%) out of 10 MR investigations documented in the medical records had not been mentioned by the patients. As many as 41 (75%) of the 55 preliminary sonograms performed by general practitioners and specialists in private practice were not documented in the medical records. Even though records existed of clinically plausible findings, 36 (84%) of the 43 preliminary US investigations performed by doctors in the University Hospital were repeated to verify the diagnosis without any further diagnostic benefit.Conclusion: A cross-speciality consensus over the diagnostic value of B-image sonography and management of the findings obtained is of paramount importance.     

Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial

Radiotherapy utilization rates in rural Australia are suboptimal, with one solution being the building of single machine units (SMUs). One concern raised with such an approach is the quality of care delivered in SMUs. The Australian and Victorian governments have established two SMUs in the state of Victoria, with each SMU operated as a satellite service of a major 'hub' site. We report on the planned evaluation of practice quality. Radiation oncologist (RO) clinical practice was externally audited using the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists Peer Review Audit instrument. This tool splits RO clinical practice into documentation/quality assurance (QA) criteria and decision-making criteria. Over the four sites, 130 patients were randomly selected for audit. At hub sites, 79.6% of all criteria audited were adequate, compared with 84.4% of criteria audited at SMUs (P = 0.0002). This difference was largely because of better adherence to documentation/QA criteria at the SMU sites. RO decision-making and protocol adherence were routinely very high and consistent with other clinical practice audits. There were no significant differences between hubs and SMUs for adherence to decision-making criteria; however, the few potential deficiencies in patient care identified occurred only at the hub sites. In at least one of these cases, potential suboptimal management was as a direct result of inadequate documentation. This audit found that SMUs provide as high a standard of radiotherapeutic care as larger hub departments. The findings also emphasize the need for all departments to target clinical documentation.     

Prospective Multisite Cohort Study to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making Utilization Among Individuals Screened for Lung Cancer

PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine the frequency, components of, and factors associated with shared decision-making (SDM) discussions according to electronic health record (EHR) documentation among individuals undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS).MethodsA prospective observational cohort study was conducted of individuals undergoing LCS between February 2015 and June 2020 at four LCS centers. The primary outcome was EHR-documented SDM, defined using Medicare-designated components. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine predictors of EHR-documented SDM. A secondary outcome was agreement of individual’s self-report of SDM and EHR-documented SDM, evaluated using Cohen’s κ statistic.ResultsAmong screened individuals, 41.9% (243 of 580) had EHR-documented SDM, and 71.1% (295 of 415) had self-reported SDM. Decision aids were used in 55.6% of EHR-documented SDM encounters (135 of 243), and 21.8% of documented SDM encounters (53 of 243) included all Medicare-designated components. SDM was documented more frequently in individuals with body mass index ≥ 25 versus <25 kg/m² (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.52) and in currently versus formerly smoking individuals (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02-2.32). Nonpulmonary referring clinicians were less likely to document SDM than pulmonary clinicians (internal medicine: aOR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.53; family medicine: aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.04-0.14; other specialties: aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.21). In a subset of 415 individuals, there was little agreement between individual self-report of SDM and EHR-documented SDM (κ = 0.184), with variation in agreement on the basis of referring clinician specialty.ConclusionsAlthough EHR-documented SDM occurred in fewer than half of individuals undergoing LCS, self-reported SDM rates were higher, suggesting that SDM may be underdocumented in the EHR. In addition, EHR-documented SDM was more likely in individuals with higher body mass index and those referred for LCS by pulmonary clinicians. These findings indicate areas for improvement in the implementation and documentation of SDM.     

The effect of quality assurance on flight nurse documentation

This study was developed to evaluate if a structured quality assurance program has an effect on nursing documentation. A randomized, retrospective audit of records was conducted from 1985 to 1989, and in November 1987, a structured QA program was initiated for flight nurses. Each chart was audited for completeness of 69 elements from seven categories: administrative information, patient history, physical exam, management plan, vital signs, medications and intravenous access. A comparison of audit results was conducted before and after the QA program was initiated. A total of 224 charts were audited, 123 before the QA program and 101 after. There was statistically significant improvement in 4 of 13 administrative, 5 of 7 history, 21 of 31 physical exam, 2 of 6 management, 2 of 2 vital signs, 0 of 4 medication, and 0 of 6 intravenous access elements. Twenty-five of 35 categories that did not show improvement had initial completion rates greater than 90 percent. The significant improvement in documentation by flight nurses after a formal QA program was initiated lead the authors to conclude that QA benefits air medical programs by providing a mechanism to improve documentation.     

Clinical Documentation and Patient Care Using Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Oncology

Detailed clinical documentation is required in the patient-facing specialty of radiation oncology. The burden of clinical documentation has increased significantly with the introduction of electronic health records and participation in payer-mandated quality initiatives. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to reduce the burden of data entry associated with clinical documentation, provide clinical decision support, improve quality and value, and integrate patient data from multiple sources. The authors discuss key elements of an AI-enhanced clinic and review some emerging technologies in the industry. Challenges regarding data privacy, regulation, and medicolegal liabilities must be addressed for such AI technologies to be successful.     

Implementation of a Semistructured Clinical Event Documentation Tool for Acute Adverse Contrast Reactions

PurposeTo improve the efficiency and accuracy of clinicians documenting acute clinical events related to contrast agent administration using a web browser–based semistructured documentation support tool.MethodsA new tool called Contrast Incident Support and Reporting (CISaR) was developed to enable radiologists responding to contrast reactions to document inciting contrast class, type of event, severity of contrast reaction, and recommendation for future contrast use. Retrospective analysis was conducted of all CT and MRI examinations performed between February 2018 and December 2019 across our hospital system with associated contrast reaction documentation. Time periods were defined as before tool deployment, early adoption, and steady-state deployment. The primary outcome measure was the presence of event documentation by a radiologist. The secondary outcome measure was completeness of the documentation parameters.ResultsA total of 431 CT and MRI studies with reactions were included in the study, and 50% of studies had radiologist documentation during the pre-CISaR period. This increased to 66% during the early adoption period and 89% in the post-CISaR period. It took approximately 9 months from the introduction of CISaR to reach full adoption and become the main method for adverse contrast reaction documentation. The percentage of radiologist documentation that detailed provoking contrast agent class, severity of reaction, reaction type, and future contrast agent recommendation all significantly increased (P < .0001), with greater than 95% inclusion of each element.ConclusionThe implementation of a semistructured electronic application for adverse contrast reaction reporting significantly increased radiologist documentation rate and completeness of the documentation.     

Applying virtual reality in forensics – a virtual scene walkthrough

A major task of forensic investigations is the documentation and interpretation of evidence to reconstruct a forensically relevant incident. To accomplish this task, a scene is documented not only with photographs but also with 3D documentation technologies. The resulting 3D data are used for 3D visualization and to perform 3D reconstructions. In this article, we present an approach for using forensic 3D data in conjunction with virtual reality to perform scene walkthroughs in the context of witness or suspect interrogations. The aim is to provide a method for scene visits showing the original scene even years after the incident. These scene walkthroughs in VR can be reproduced and allow to see through the eyes of a witness by recording their behavior and actions. These recordings allow subsequent examinations and reconstruction to support the investigation and scene understanding and can be used as evidence in court.     

Internal radionuclide therapy: software for treatment planning using tomographic data

AIM: Accurate dosimetry must be performed for each patient before therapy with unsealed radionuclides. Recently, the software tool ULMDOS was developed to facilitate planar dosimetric calculations and to support traceability and documentation as a prerequisite for good clinical practice. Here, the extended version of ULMDOS for processing of tomographic data is presented. METHODS: ULMDOS is developed in IDL 6.1 (Interactive Data Language) under Windows XP/2000. Serial tomographic data can be loaded in an ECAT7 or DICOM format, and presented as maximum intensity projection. The definition of volumes of interest is supported by various tools (e.g., freehand, isocontour, polygon), region growing, and cluster analysis. Residence times are calculated from fits of the time activity data to exponential functions. RESULTS, DISCUSSION: Quantitative 3-dimensional data allow performing a more individualized dosimetry, as problems due to organ overlay, insufficient attenuation and scatter correction in the planar approach can be avoided. For traceability, documentation, retrospective examination and later processing all data can be saved in binary or ASCII format. Dosimetric calculations can be conducted within a single environment, thus it spares the time-consuming transfer of data between different software tools.