Aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, or both in unstable angina. Results of a Canadian multicenter trial

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 555 patients with unstable angina who were hospitalized in coronary care units. Patients received one of four possible treatment regimens: aspirin (325 mg four times daily), sulfinpyrazone (200 mg four times daily), both, or neither. They were entered into the trial within eight days of hospitalization and were treated and followed for up to two years (mean, 18 months). The incidence of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, considered together, was 8.6 per cent in the groups given aspirin and 17.0 per cent in the other groups, representing a risk reduction with aspirin of 51 per cent (P = 0.008). The corresponding figures for either cardiac death alone or death from any cause were 3.0 per cent in the groups given aspirin and 11.7 per cent in the other groups, representing a risk reduction of 71 per cent (P = 0.004). Analysis by intention to treat yielded smaller risk reductions with aspirin of 30 per cent (P = 0.072), 56 per cent (P = 0.009), and 43 per cent (P = 0.035) for the outcomes of cardiac death or nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, cardiac death alone, and all deaths, respectively. There was no observed benefit of sulfinpyrazone for any outcome event, and there was no evidence of an interaction between sulfinpyrazone and aspirin. Considered together with the results of a previous clinical trial, these findings provide strong evidence for a beneficial effect of aspirin in patients with unstable angina.     

Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported that women with acute myocardial infarction have in-hospital and long-term outcomes that are worse than those of men. METHODS: To assess sex-based differences in presentation and outcome, we examined data from the Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb study, which enrolled 12,142 patients (3662 women and 8480 men) with acute coronary syndromes, including infarction with ST-segment elevation, infarction with no ST-segment elevation, and unstable angina. RESULTS: Overall, the women were older than the men, and had significantly higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and prior congestive heart failure. They had significantly lower rates of prior myocardial infarction and were less likely ever to have smoked. A smaller percentage of women than men had infarction with ST elevation (27.2 percent vs. 37.0 percent, P<0.001), and of the patients who presented with no ST elevation (those with myocardial infarction or unstable angina), fewer women than men had myocardial infarction (36.6 percent vs. 47.6 percent, P<0.001). Women had more complications than men during hospitalization and a higher mortality rate at 30 days (6.0 percent vs. 4.0 percent, P<0.001) but had similar rates of reinfarction at 30 days after presentation. However, there was a significant interaction between sex and the type of coronary syndrome at presentation (P=0.001). After stratification according to coronary syndrome and adjustment for base-line variables, there was a nonsignificant trend toward an increased risk of death or reinfarction among women as compared with men only in the group with infarction and ST elevation (odds ratio, 1.27; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.98 to 1.63; P=0.07). Among patients with unstable angina, female sex was associated with an independent protective effect (odds ratio for infarction or death, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.49 to 0.87; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Women and men with acute coronary syndromes had different clinical profiles, presentation, and outcomes. These differences could not be entirely accounted for by differences in base-line characteristics and may reflect pathophysiologic and anatomical differences between men and women.     

Aspirin, heparin, or both to treat acute unstable angina

We tested the usefulness of aspirin (325 mg twice daily), heparin (1000 units per hour by intravenous infusion), and a combination of the two in the early management of acute unstable angina pectoris in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving 479 patients. The patients entered the study as soon as possible after hospital admission (at a mean [+/- SD] of 7.9 +/- 8.0 hours after the last episode of pain), and the study was ended after 6 +/- 3 days, when definitive therapy had been selected. Major end points--refractory angina, myocardial infarction, and death--occurred in 23, 12, and 1.7 percent of the 118 patients receiving placebo, respectively. Heparin was associated with a decrease in the occurrence of refractory angina (P = 0.002). The incidence of myocardial infarction was significantly reduced in the groups receiving aspirin (3 percent; P = 0.01), heparin (0.8 percent; P less than 0.001), and aspirin plus heparin (1.6 percent, P = 0.003), and no deaths occurred in these groups. There were too few deaths overall to permit evaluation of the effect of treatment on this end point. The combination of aspirin and heparin had no greater protective effect than heparin alone but was associated with slightly more serious bleeding (3.3 vs. 1.7 percent). We conclude that in the acute phase of unstable angina, either aspirin or heparin treatment is associated with a reduced incidence of myocardial infarction, and there is a trend favoring heparin over aspirin. Heparin treatment is also associated with a reduced incidence of refractory angina.     

Prognostic value of exercise testing soon after myocardial infarction.

The prognostic value of a limited treadmill exercises test performed one day before hospital discharge after acute myocardial infarction was studied in 210 consecutive patients who had no over heart failure and had been free of chest pain for at least four days. No complications occurred. During a one-year follow-up period 28 of 43 patients (65 per cent) who had chest pain during the test reported angina, as compared with 60 of 167 (36 per cent) who had no chest pain during test (P less than 0.001). The one-year mortality rates were 2.1 per cent (three of 146) in patients without changes in the S-T segment during exercise and 27 per cent (17 of 64) in those with depression of the S-T segment (P less than 0.001). Sudden death occurred in one of 146 (0.7 per cent) patients who showed no change in the S-T segment and in 10 of 64 (16 per cent) with depression of the segment (P less than 0.001). Thus, a limited treadmill exercise test performed before hospital discharge after acute myocardial infarction is safe and can predict mortality in the subsequent year.     

Six-year follow-up of the Norwegian Multicenter Study on Timolol after Acute Myocardial Infarction

The original Norwegian Multicenter Study on Timolol after Myocardial Infarction was a double-blind, randomized study comparing the effect of timolol with that of placebo for up to 33 months after acute myocardial infarction. The initial results showed that the cumulated mortality rate was 39.4 per cent lower among 945 patients randomly assigned to timolol treatment than among 939 patients randomly assigned to placebo (P = 0.0003). After the end of the double-blind period the majority of participating patients in the timolol group continued to receive beta-adrenergic blockade, whereas the majority of placebo-treated patients continued without such blockade. During an extended follow-up of participating patients up to 72 months after randomization, the mortality curves of the two groups continued to rise in parallel. Cumulated mortality rates were 32.3 per cent in the placebo group and 26.4 per cent in the timolol group (P = 0.0028). We conclude that the previously observed early beneficial effect of beta-adrenergic blocking therapy is maintained for at least six years after infarction.     

Ten-year survival after coronary bypass surgery for unstable angina

We have assessed the long-term results of coronary bypass surgery performed for unstable angina in 1282 patients from 1970 to 1982. The operative mortality was 1.8 per cent; in the first 4 years it was 2.5 per cent, and in the last 8 1/2 years it was 1.7 per cent. Using actuarial techniques, we determined that the 5-year and 10-year survival rates (mean +/- S.E.) were 92 +/- 1 per cent and 83 +/- 2 per cent, respectively, for the whole group. For patients with "normal" left ventricular function, they were 92 +/- 2 per cent and 86 +/- 3 per cent, and for patients with "abnormal" left ventricular function 91 +/- 2 per cent and 79 +/- 4 per cent (P = 0.14). No significant differences were observed in the long-term survival for any of the three clinical subgroups of patients with unstable angina--angina at rest, angina after recovery from acute myocardial infarction, and progressive angina of recent onset (P = 0.49). The reoperation rates at 5 and 10 years were 6 +/- per cent and 17 +/- 3 per cent. Currently, 61 per cent of the survivors have no angina; angina occurs on severe exertion in 20 per cent, on ordinary exertion in 14 per cent, and on mild exertion in 5 per cent. We conclude that coronary bypass surgery is an effective form of therapy (for up to 10 years) in patients with unstable angina.     

Are early clinical effects of cholesterol lowering mediated through effects on inflammation?

In a randomized, double-blind trial in 3086 patients with unstable angina pectoris or non-Q wave myocardial infarction we investigated if 80 mg of atorvastatin daily could improve outcome of cardiovascular events during a short period of time (16 weeks) compared with placebo. Baseline LDL cholesterol was 3.2 mmol L-1 (124 mg dL-1) and decreased by 40% to 1.9 mmol L-1 (72 mg dL-1) during atorvastatin treatment. The primary endpoint, which was a composite of death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest with resuscitation or recurrent symptomatic myocardial ischaemia with objective evidence and requiring emergency rehospitalization occurred in 228 patients (14.8%) in the atorvastatin group and 269 patients (17.4%) in the placebo group. The relative risk was 0.84 and 95% confidence interval was 0.70-1.00 (P = 0.048). Thus for patients with acute coronary syndromes, lipid-lowering therapy with high dose atorvastatin reduces recurrent ischaemic events in the short-term. A possible mechanism behind this rapid clinical effect induced by statin treatment is on inflammatory processes. Recent studies strongly suggest that acute T-cell activation is involved in the pathogenesis of unstable angina. In another study we investigated whether circulating T cells showed signs of activation in patients with stable angina pectoris (SA). Systemic venous blood samples were taken from 38 men with SA and 42 healthy controls. The T-cell receptor expression was assessed by three-colour flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies against CD3,CD4, CD8, CD25 and human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-DR. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) was measured as the circulating form in serum. Levels of circulating CD3+ and CD4+ T cells tended to be higher in patients compared with controls. Patients were also shown to have a significant increase in CD4+ T cells expressing the activation markers CD25 (P < 0.05) and HLA-DR (P < 0.01). Furthermore, serum levels of sIL-2R were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in patients than in controls. We also observed that the T-cell response was more pronounced in patients without simvastatin treatment (n = 18) compared with simvastatin-treated patients (n = 20). In conclusion, our findings indicate that a continuous immune system activation takes place in patients with chronic angina pectoris, predominantly involving proliferation of CD4+ T cells. Statin treatment seems to be able to decrease this inflammatory response.     

Reactivation of unstable angina after the discontinuation of heparin.

BACKGROUND. Heparin is an effective, widely used treatment for unstable angina. Among patients enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing intravenous heparin, aspirin, both treatments, and neither during the acute phase of unstable angina, we encountered patients in whom unstable angina was reactivated after heparin was discontinued. METHODS. The study population included 403 of the original 479 patients in the trial who had completed six days of blinded therapy without refractory angina or myocardial infarction. After the discontinuation of therapy, clinical events, including reactivation of unstable angina and myocardial infarction occurring within 96 hours after hospitalization, were closely monitored. RESULTS. Early reactivation occurred in 14 of the 107 patients who received heparin alone, as compared with only 5 patients in each of the other three study groups (P less than 0.01). These reactivations required urgent intervention (thrombolysis, angioplasty, or coronary-bypass surgery) in 11 patients treated with heparin alone, but in only 2 patients in the other groups combined (P less than 0.01). Four of the six patients who had a myocardial infarction during a reactivation of their disease were in the heparin group. Reactivations in this group occurred in a cluster a mean (+/- SD) of 9.5 +/- 5 hours after the discontinuation of the study drug but were randomly distributed over the initial 96 hours in the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS. Although heparin is beneficial in treating unstable angina, the disease process may be reactivated within hours of the discontinuation of this drug. Concomitant therapy with aspirin may prevent this withdrawal phenomenon.     

Benefit of abciximab in patients with refractory unstable angina in relation to serum troponin T levels. c7E3 Fab Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable Refractory Angina (CAPTURE) Study Investigators.

BACKGROUND: In patients with refractory unstable angina, the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-receptor antibody abciximab reduces the incidence of cardiac events before and during coronary angioplasty. We investigated whether serum troponin T levels identify patients most likely to benefit from therapy with this drug. METHODS: Among 1265 patients with unstable angina who were enrolled in the c7E3 Fab Antiplatelet Therapy in Unstable Refractory Angina (CAPTURE) trial, serum samples drawn at the time of randomization to abciximab or placebo were available from 890 patients; we used these samples for the determination of troponin T and creatine kinase MB levels. Patients with postinfarction angina were not included. RESULTS: Serum troponin T levels at the time of study entry were elevated (above 0.1 ng per milliliter) in 275 patients (30.9 percent). Among patients receiving placebo, the risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was related to troponin T levels. The six-month cumulative event rate was 23.9 percent among patients with elevated troponin T levels, as compared with 7.5 percent among patients without elevated troponin T levels (P<0.001). Among patients treated with abciximab, the respective six-month event rates were 9.5 percent for patients with elevated troponin T levels and 9.4 percent for those without elevated levels. As compared with placebo, the relative risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction associated with treatment with abciximab in patients with elevated troponin T levels was 0.32 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.14 to 0.62; P=0.002). The lower event rates in patients receiving abciximab were attributable to a reduction in the rate of myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 0.23; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.49; P<0.001). In patients without elevated troponin T levels, there was no benefit of treatment with respect to the relative risk of death or myocardial infarction at six months (odds ratio, 1.26; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 2.31; P=0.47). CONCLUSIONS: The serum troponin T level, which is considered to be a surrogate marker for thrombus formation, identifies a high-risk subgroup of patients with refractory unstable angina suitable for coronary angioplasty who will particularly benefit from antiplatelet treatment with abciximab.     

The prognostic value of serum troponin T in unstable angina.

BACKGROUND. Cardiac troponin T is a regulatory contractile protein not normally found in blood. Its detection in the circulation has been shown to be a sensitive and specific marker for myocardial cell damage. We used a newly developed enzyme immunoassay for troponin T to determine whether its presence in the serum of patients with unstable angina was a prognostic indicator. METHODS. We screened 109 patients with unstable angina (25 with accelerated or subacute angina and 84 with acute angina at rest) for serum creatine kinase activity, creatine kinase isoenzyme MB activity, and troponin T every eight hours for two days after admission to the hospital. The outcomes of interest during the hospitalization were death and myocardial infarction. RESULTS. Troponin T was detected (range, 0.20 to 3.64 micrograms per liter; mean, 0.78; median, 0.50) in the serum of 33 of the 84 patients (39 percent) with acute angina at rest. Only three of these patients had elevated creatine kinase MB activity (two were positive for troponin T, and one was negative). Of the 33 patients who were positive for troponin T, 10 (30 percent) had myocardial infarction (3 after coronary-artery bypass surgery), and 5 of these died during hospitalization. In contrast, only 1 of the 51 patients with angina at rest who were negative for troponin T had an acute myocardial infarction (P less than 0.001), and this patient died (P = 0.03). Thus, 10 of the 11 patients with myocardial infarctions had detectable levels of troponin T; only 1 had elevated creatine kinase MB activity. Troponin T was not detected in any of the 25 patients with accelerated or subacute angina, and none of these patients died. CONCLUSIONS. Cardiac troponin T in serum appears to be a more sensitive indicator of myocardial-cell injury than serum creatine kinase MB activity, and its detection in the circulation may be a useful prognostic indicator in patients with unstable angina.     

Angioscopic evaluation of coronary-artery thrombi in acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND. Disruption of an atherosclerotic plaque in a coronary artery followed by the formation of a thrombus is believed to be the cause of both unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction. Although thrombolytic therapy is efficacious in patients with acute myocardial infarction, for unknown reasons it is far less effective in patients with unstable angina. We postulated that there might be differences in the composition of the coronary-artery thrombi in unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction. METHODS. To investigate the appearance of coronary-artery thrombi, we performed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioscopy in 15 patients with unstable angina and 16 with acute myocardial infarction. Angioscopy was performed within 48 hours after an episode of pain at rest in the patients with unstable angina and within 8 hours of onset in those with acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS. Angioscopy revealed coronary thrombi in all but two patients (one in each group). Of the 29 patients with thrombi, those with unstable angina were frequently observed to have grayish-white thrombi (10 of 14, 71 percent), but none were seen in the 15 patients with acute myocardial infarction (P less than 0.01). By contrast, reddish thrombi were observed in all 15 patients with acute myocardial infarction who had thrombi, but in only 4 of the 14 patients with unstable angina and thrombi (P less than 0.01). As assessed by coronary angiography, occlusive thrombi occurred frequently in patients with acute myocardial infarction (13 of 16 patients) but were not seen in any of the 15 patients with unstable angina (P less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. Coronary-artery thrombi play an important part in the pathogenesis of unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction. However, the appearance of the thrombi is different in the two conditions, possibly reflecting differences in the composition of age of the thrombi or the presence or absence of blood flow in the artery. This difference may account for the contrasting results of thrombolytic therapy.     

Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators.

BACKGROUND. Left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction after myocardial infarction are major predictors of death. In experimental and clinical studies, longterm therapy with the angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitor captopril attenuated ventricular dilatation and remodeling. We investigated whether captopril could reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after a myocardial infarction. METHODS. Within 3 to 16 days after myocardial infarction, 2231 patients with ejection fractions of 40 percent or less but without overt heart failure or symptoms of myocardial ischemia were randomly assigned to receive doubleblind treatment with either placebo (1116 patients) or captopril (1115 patients) and were followed for an average of 42 months. RESULTS. Mortality from all causes was significantly reduced in the captopril group (228 deaths, or 20 percent) as compared with the placebo group (275 deaths, or 25 percent); the reduction in risk was 19 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 3 to 32 percent; P = 0.019). In addition, the incidence of both fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events was consistently reduced in the captopril group. The reduction in risk was 21 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 35 percent; P = 0.014) for death from cardiovascular causes, 37 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 20 to 50 percent; P less than 0.001) for the development of severe heart failure, 22 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 4 to 37 percent; P = 0.019) for congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization, and 25 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 40 percent; P = 0.015) for recurrent myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction, long-term administration of captopril was associated with an improvement in survival and reduced morbidity and mortality due to major cardiovascular events. These benefits were observed in patients who received thrombolytic therapy, aspirin, or beta-blockers, as well as those who did not, suggesting that treatment with captopril leads to additional improvement in outcome among selected survivors of myocardial infarction.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: When administered in conjunction with primary coronary stenting for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor may provide additional clinical benefit, but data on this combination therapy are limited. METHODS: We randomly assigned 300 patients with acute myocardial infarction in a double-blind fashion either to abciximab plus stenting (149 patients) or placebo plus stenting (151 patients) before they underwent coronary angiography. Clinical outcomes were evaluated 30 days and 6 months after the procedure. The angiographic patency of the infarct-related vessel and the left ventricular ejection fraction were evaluated at 24 hours and 6 months. RESULTS: At 30 days, the primary end point--a composite of death, reinfarction, or urgent revascularization of the target vessel--had occurred in 6.0 percent of the patients in the abciximab group, as compared with 14.6 percent of those in the placebo group (P=0.01); at 6 months, the corresponding figures were 7.4 percent and 15.9 percent (P=0.02). The better clinical outcomes in the abciximab group were related to the greater frequency of grade 3 coronary flow (according to the classification of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial) in this group than in the placebo group before the procedure (16.8 percent vs. 5.4 percent, P=0.01), immediately afterward (95.1 percent vs. 86.7 percent, P=0.04), and six months afterward (94.3 percent vs. 82.8 percent, P=0.04). One major bleeding event occurred in the abciximab group (0.7 percent); none occurred in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with placebo, early administration of abciximab in patients with acute myocardial infarction improves coronary patency before stenting, the success rate of the stenting procedure, the rate of coronary patency at six months, left ventricular function, and clinical outcomes.     

Effects of the early administration of enalapril on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II (CONSENSUS II)

BACKGROUND. Long-term administration of angiotensin-converting--enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has been shown to improve survival in patients with symptomatic left ventricular failure and to attenuate left ventricular dilatation in patients with myocardial infarction. We studied whether mortality could be reduced during the 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction with use of the ACE inhibitor enalapril. METHODS. At 103 Scandinavian centers patients with acute myocardial infarctions and blood pressure above 100/60 mm Hg were randomly assigned to treatment with either enalapril or placebo, in addition to conventional therapy. Therapy was initiated with an intravenous infusion of enalapril (enalaprilat) within 24 hours after the onset of chest pain, followed by administration of oral enalapril. RESULTS. Of the 6090 patients enrolled, 3046 were assigned to placebo and 3044 to enalapril. The life-table mortality rates in the two groups at one and six months were not significantly different (6.3 and 10.2 percent in the placebo group vs. 7.2 and 11.0 percent in the enalapril group, P = 0.26). The relative risk of death in the enalapril group was 1.10 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.93 to 1.29). Death due to progressive heart failure occurred in 104 patients (3.4 percent) in the placebo group and 132 (4.3 percent) in the enalapril group (P = 0.06). Therapy had to be changed because of worsening heart failure in 30 percent of the placebo group and 27 percent of the enalapril group (P less than 0.006). Early hypotension (systolic pressure less than 90 mm Hg or diastolic pressure less than 50 mm Hg) occurred in 12 percent of the enalapril group and 3 percent of the placebo group (P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS. Enalapril therapy started within 24 hours of the onset of acute myocardial infarction does not improve survival during the 180 days after infarction.     

Cimetidine and tranexamic acid in the treatment of acute upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding

We studied the effects of tranexamic acid (an antifibrinolytic agent) and cimetidine on acute upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial in 775 patients with hematemesis or melena or both. Mortality was significantly reduced in patients receiving either tranexamic acid (mortality, 6.3 per cent) or cimetidine (7.7 per cent), as compared with patients receiving placebo (13.5 per cent) (P = 0.0092 for tranexamic acid vs. placebo, P = 0.045 for cimetidine vs. placebo). Ninety-nine patients were withdrawn before the code was broken, mainly because their primary illness was considered not to be due to acute upper-gastrointestinal-tract bleeding. Mortality among those withdrawn was high (22 per cent), and their exclusion reduced death rates to 4 per cent in those given tranexamic acid, 8 per cent in those given cimetidine, and 11 per cent in those given placebo (P = 0.0072 for tranexamic acid vs. placebo, P greater than 0.50 for cimetidine vs. placebo). The reduced mortality associated with tranexamic acid was detectable at both participating hospitals and in most of the main subgroups of patients classified according to site of bleeding. However, treatment with this agent was not associated with any decrease in the rate of rebleeding or the need for operation.     

The western Washington randomized trial of intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. A 12-month follow-up report

After cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography, 134 patients who had had an acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to treatment with intracoronary streptokinase (4000 U per minute, begun approximately 4 1/2 hours after the onset of symptoms, for a total of 286,000 +/- 77,800 U over 72 +/- 24 minutes); 116 control patients received standard care after they returned to the coronary care unit, immediately after angiography. Preliminary results of this trial have been published in the Journal (1983; 309:1477-81). During the first 30 days, 5 deaths occurred in the streptokinase group and 13 occurred in the control group (3.7 vs 11.2 per cent, P = 0.02); during the first year, the corresponding figures were 11 and 17 deaths (8.2 vs. 14.7 per cent, P = 0.10). However, when a minor imbalance in the ejection fraction and infarct location between the two groups was adjusted by logistic regression, the difference in one-year mortality became significant (P = 0.03). In the streptokinase group, 2 of the 80 patients in whom perfusion was reestablished (2.5 per cent) had died by one year, whereas 3 of the 13 with partial reperfusion (23.1 per cent) and 6 of the 41 with no reperfusion (14.6 per cent) had died (P = 0.008). Mortality among patients with partial reperfusion was not significantly different from that among those without reperfusion (P greater than 0.90). No base-line clinical, angiographic, or hemodynamic variable was predictive of successful reperfusion, according to univariate and multivariate analyses. We conclude that intracoronary streptokinase reduces one-year mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction, but this improvement occurs only among those in whom thrombolysis results in coronary artery reperfusion.     

Pravastatin therapy and the risk of stroke

BACKGROUND: Several epidemiologic studies have concluded that there is no relation between total cholesterol levels and the risk of stroke. In some studies that classified strokes according to cause, there was an association between increasing cholesterol levels and the risk of ischemic stroke and a possible association between low cholesterol levels and the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Recent reviews of trials of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors have suggested that these agents may reduce the risk of stroke. METHODS: In a double-blind trial (the Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease study), we compared the effects of pravastatin on mortality due to coronary heart disease (the primary end point) with the effects of placebo among 9014 patients with a history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina and a total cholesterol level of 155 to 271 mg per deciliter (4.0 to 7.0 mmol per liter). Our goal in the present study was to assess effects on stroke from any cause and nonhemorrhagic stroke, which were secondary end points. RESULTS: There were 419 strokes among 373 patients over a follow-up period of six years. A total of 309 strokes were classified as ischemic, 31 as hemorrhagic, and 79 as of unknown type. Among the patients given placebo, the risk of stroke was 4.5 percent, as compared with 3.7 percent among those given pravastatin (relative reduction in risk, 19 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0 to 34 percent; P=0.05). Non-hemorrhagic stroke occurred in 4.4 percent of the patients given placebo, as compared with 3.4 percent of those given pravastatin (reduction in risk, 23 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 5 to 38 percent; P=0.02). Pravastatin had no effect on hemorrhagic stroke (incidence, 0.2 percent in the placebo group vs. 0.4 percent in the pravastatin group; P=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin has a moderate effect in reducing the risk of stroke from any cause and the risk of nonhemorrhagic stroke in patients with previous myocardial infarction or unstable angina.     

Fibrin and fibrinogen-related antigens in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease

Coronary-artery thrombosis may be important in the pathogenesis of unstable angina at rest. To study this possibility, we measured the serum concentrations of fibrin-related antigen, D dimer (the principal breakdown fragment of fibrin), and fibrin monomer (an intermediate product of fibrin formation) in the serum of five groups of subjects. These included 10 healthy controls, 10 controls with noncardiac pain, and three groups of 10 patients each with chronic stable angina, unstable angina at rest, or acute myocardial infarction. The concentration of fibrin-related antigen (normal range, 48 to 184 ng per milliliter) was normal in the control patients with noncardiac pain (63 to 202 ng per milliliter) and in patients with chronic stable angina (95 to 186), but it was increased in patients with unstable angina (401 to 2507) or acute myocardial infarction (470 to 1930) (P less than 0.001). D dimer concentrations in patients with unstable angina (178.3 to 310.6 ng per milliliter) or acute myocardial infarction (103.9 to 321.6) were higher than those in patients with chronic stable angina (28.6 to 52.1), in controls with noncardiac pain (44.7 to 53.1), and in healthy controls (40.4 to 50.3) (P less than 0.001). Concentrations of fibrin monomer were highest in patients with acute myocardial infarction (247.5 to 571.3 ng per milliliter) (P less than 0.001), intermediate in those with unstable angina (54.7 to 241.7) (P less than 0.001), and normal (normal range, 14.5 to 19.8 ng per milliliter) in controls with noncardiac pain (12.0 to 18.4). and patients with chronic stable angina (10.7 to 17.6). These findings suggest the presence of an active thrombotic process in patients with unstable angina at rest or acute myocardial infarction. The data do not prove that the coronary arteries were the site of the thrombotic process, but the observations are consistent with the hypothesis that thrombus formation may have an important role in the pathogenesis of these conditions.     

Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban.

BACKGROUND: There is continued debate as to whether a routine, early invasive strategy is superior to a conservative strategy for the management of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation. METHODS: We enrolled 2220 patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who had electrocardiographic evidence of changes in the ST segment or T wave, elevated levels of cardiac markers, a history of coronary artery disease, or all three findings. All patients were treated with aspirin, heparin, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. They were randomly assigned to an early invasive strategy, which included routine catheterization within 4 to 48 hours and revascularization as appropriate, or to a more conservative (selectively invasive) strategy, in which catheterization was performed only if the patient had objective evidence of recurrent ischemia or an abnormal stress test. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome at six months. RESULTS: At six months, the rate of the primary end point was 15.9 percent with use of the early invasive strategy and 19.4 percent with use of the conservative strategy (odds ratio, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.97; P=0.025). The rate of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction at six months was similarly reduced (7.3 percent vs. 9.5 percent; odds ratio, 0.74; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.54 to 1.00; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation who were treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban, the use of an early invasive strategy significantly reduced the incidence of major cardiac events. These data support a policy involving broader use of the early inhibition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in combination with an early invasive strategy in such patients.     

Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial

BACKGROUND AND METHODS. In the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial, designed to test the hypothesis that suppression of ventricular ectopy after a myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of sudden death, patients in whom ventricular ectopy could be suppressed with encainide, flecainide, or moricizine were randomly assigned to receive either active drug or placebo. The use of encainide and flecainide was discontinued because of excess mortality. We examined the mortality and morbidity after randomization to encainide or flecainide or their respective placebo. RESULTS. Of 1498 patients, 857 were assigned to receive encainide or its placebo (432 to active drug and 425 to placebo) and 641 were assigned to receive flecainide or its placebo (323 to active drug and 318 to placebo). After a mean follow-up of 10 months, 89 patients had died: 59 of arrhythmia (43 receiving drug vs. 16 receiving placebo; P = 0.0004), 22 of nonarrhythmic cardiac causes (17 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo; P = 0.01), and 8 of noncardiac causes (3 receiving drug vs. 5 receiving placebo). Almost all cardiac deaths not due to arrhythmia were attributed to acute myocardial infarction with shock (11 patients receiving drug and 3 receiving placebo) or to chronic congestive heart failure (4 receiving drug and 2 receiving placebo). There were no differences between the patients receiving active drug and those receiving placebo in the incidence of nonlethal disqualifying ventricular tachycardia, proarrhythmia, syncope, need for a permanent pacemaker, congestive heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, angina, or need for coronary-artery bypass grafting or angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS. There was an excess of deaths due to arrhythmia and deaths due to shock after acute recurrent myocardial infarction in patients treated with encainide or flecainide. Nonlethal events, however, were equally distributed between the active-drug and placebo groups. The mechanisms underlying the excess mortality during treatment with encainide or flecainide remain unknown.