Stability following combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies treated with rigid internal fixation

Skeletal stability was examined in 16 patients following combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies using rigid internal fixation. Postoperative changes (T2 to T3) were generally less than 1.0 mm for linear measurements and less than 2.0 degrees for angular measurements. The removal of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) splints accounted for 85% to 95% of the counterclockwise rotation in the proximal and distal mandibular segments from T2 to T3. Maxillary inferior repositioning and large mandibular advancements exhibited the greatest tendency for relapse; however, the changes were less than with comparable procedures using nonrigid methods for stabilization. Except for large mandibular advancements, relapse was essentially unrelated to the magnitude of the surgical repositioning. Although the use of skeletal, maxillomandibular, and transosseous wire fixation have traditionally provided satisfactory clinical results, the use of rigid internal fixation in combined osteotomy procedures provides better stabilization of dentosseous segments when compared with these nonrigid methods, and may be particularly indicated in complex surgical procedures.     

Stability of simultaneous maxillary intrusion and mandibular advancement: A comparison of rigid and nonrigid fixation techniques

This study examines the short-term stability of bimaxillary surgery following Le Fort I impaction with simultaneous bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular advancement using two standard techniques of postsurgical fixation. Fifteen adults had skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation, and fifteen adults had rigid internal fixation using bone plates in the maxilla and bicortical bone screws between the proximal and distal segments in the mandible. The group with rigid internal fixation did not undergo maxillomandibular fixation. Radiographic cephalograms were analyzed during the postsurgical period to evaluate skeletal and dental stability. There was no statistical difference in postsurgical stability with rigid internal fixation or skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation other than the vertical position of the maxillary molar; the skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation group had a significant amount of postsurgical intrusion of the maxillary molar when compared with the rigid internal fixation group. Although the other measures showed no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups, the amount of variability in postsurgical stability in the group with skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation was greater than that found in the group with rigid internal fixation.     

Relapse after rigid fixation of mandibular advancement

In 19 subjects rigid fixation of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies was used for mandibular advancement. Five angles and four linear measurements were determined cephalometrically for two time intervals: before surgery to immediately after surgery (T1-T2), and immediately after surgery to six months to one year after surgery (T2-TL). A multiple regression analysis with a backward stepping procedure was used to determine relationships between relapse, as defined by the position of pogonion at T2-TL (PgT2) and B point during this same time interval (BT2). The only significant predictor of PgT2 was PgT1 (P less than 0.001) (amount of advancement of pogonion during the time interval T1-T2). When BT2 was examined, both the change in position of B point at T1-T2 (P less than 0.001) and the change in anterior facial height at T1-T2 (P less than 0.02) were significant predictors of relapse. There were no other predictors of relapse. Advancements of 6 to 7 mm or greater as measured at B or Pg deserve special attention as they were more predisposed to relapse. Methods for preventing relapse are discussed.     

Stability of mandibular advancement osteotomy using rigid internal fixation

Forty-three patients who underwent surgical lengthening of the mandible using an inverted L osteotomy, bone grafting, and rigid internal fixation between the mandibular segments were evaluated by retrospective cephalometric analysis for longitudinal skeletal and dental changes. Postoperative response (means = 1 year 9 months) was found to demonstrate a high level of stability with some individual variability. No propensity for relapse was observed in any postoperative time interval. Condylar repositioning postoperatively appeared to be an important factor in those patients who exhibited any relapse tendency. Overall postoperative stability of this surgical/fixation technique appears to be significantly improved compared with previously documented techniques.     

Skeletal stability following maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the stability of combined Le Fort I maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement performed for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion. Twenty-nine patients, mean age 22.6 years, underwent bimaxillary surgery with rigid internal fixation. Standardised cephalometric analyses were performed using serial lateral cephalometric radiographs. The post-surgical follow-up was a minimum of 12 months, with a mean of 25.2 months. The maxilla was impacted by a mean of 4.3 +/- 3.3 mm, and horizontally advanced by a mean of 2.6 +/- 2.3 mm. The results demonstrated that the maxilla tended to move anteriorly and inferiorly but this was not significant in either horizontal or vertical planes (P > 0.05). The mean advancement of the mandible, at menton, was 10.7 +/- 5.6 mm, and in 14 cases (48.2%) menton was advanced greater than 10 mm. In 34.7% of the patients the mandible underwent posterior movement between 2 and 4 mm. In the vertical plane, gonion moved superiorly by a mean of 2.7 +/- 3.6 mm which was significant. Significant mandibular relapse was found to have occurred in five female patients, with high mandibular plane angles who had undergone large advancements of greater than 10 mm. In conclusion, the majority of patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusions maintained a stable result. However, a small number of patients, exhibiting similar characteristics, suffered significant skeletal relapse in the mandible secondary to condylar remodelling and/or resorption.     

Stability associated with mandibular advancement treated by rigid osseous fixation

Relapse after a mandibular sagittal ramus split osteotomy (SSO) fixed by transosseous wire has been shown to occur. Authors who use rigid screw fixation claim a lesser incidence of such relapse. Nine subjects with horizontal mandibular deficiency treated by an SSO and fixed with bone screws were prospectively studied. Serial cephalometric radiographs were traced and superimposed on the sella-nasion line and anterior cranial base structures. A markedly reduced horizontal movement during the first six weeks at both points B and Pg, followed by a slight advancement at six months, was observed. Concomitantly, the surgically increased facial height was shown to subsequently decrease during both those time intervals. The stability of this procedure warrants further investigation.     

Hypomobility after maxillary and mandibular osteotomies

A retrospective recall study of forty patients was made to examine mandibular function after orthognathic surgery. Maximum maxillomandibular opening, protrusion, and lateral excursions were measured and compared with similar mandibular movements in a control group of patients of comparable age. Six months to 42 months after maxillary and mandibular osteotomies, the majority of patients demonstrated decreased maxillomandibular opening compared to the control group 54.8 mm (SD 4.7). The decrease was most dramatic in patients previously treated with sagittal split ramus osteotomies. The mean maxillomandibular opening after Le Fort I osteotomy to reposition the maxilla superiorly was 48.7 mm (SD 5.7); after bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies to retract the mandible it was 48.6 mm (SD 5.7); and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies to advance the mandible it was 35.1 mm (SD 6.7). The presence of mandibular hypomobility after orthognathic surgery and maxillomandibular immobilization may be due to pre-existing or surgically induced muscle or temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Our findings indicate the need for routine clinical assessment of mandibular function preoperatively and for a systematic regimen of muscular and occlusal rehabilitation postsurgically to normalize muscle function, condylar movement, and range of mandibular motion.     

The inter-relationship between mandibular autorotation and maxillary LeFort I impaction osteotomies

The purposes of the present investigation were to: 1)locate the instantaneous rotation center of mandible autorotation during maxillary surgical impaction; 2) identify the discrepancies between the resultant mandibular position following by maxillary surgical impaction and presurgical predictions, which use the radiographic condylar center as the rotation center for mandibular autorotation; and 3)find the interrelation between the magnitude of maxillary surgical impaction and the sagittal change of mandible. Ten patients underwent maxillary LeFort I impaction without concomitant major mandibular ramus split osteotomies were included. The preoperative (T0) and postoperative (T1) lateral cephalograms were used to evaluate the surgical changes and locate the center of rotation of mandibular autorotation with Reuleaux method. Prediction errors were measured by comparing the predicted (Tp) and postoperative (T1) cephalometric tracings. The magnitude of the maxillary surgical impaction was compared to the positional changes of mandible after mandibular autorotation with correlation and regression analysis. The results demonstrated that the centers of mandibular autorotation located 2.5 mm behind and 19.6 mm below the radiographic condylar center of the mandible in average with large individual variations. By using the radiographic condylar center of the mandible to predict the mandibular autorotation would overestimate the horizontal position of chin by 2 mm and underestimate the vertical position of chin by 1.3 mm following an average of 5 mm surgical maxillary impaction. The magnitude of maxillary impaction was highly and positively correlated to the horizontal displacement of chin position. The rotation centers of mandibular autorotation following by maxillary LeFort I impaction osteotomies might not usually locate at the radiographic condylar center of the mandible also with large individual variations in their positions. Surgeons and orthodontists should be aware of the horizontal and vertical discrepancies of chin positions while planning a two-jaw surgery by using the radiographic center of mandibular condyle as the rotation center in mandibular autorotation.     

Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement and rigid fixation

Twenty non-growing subjects underwent sagittal ramus osteotomies and rigid fixation. Cephalograms were analyzed before surgery, immediately after surgery and at least six months following surgery to evaluate skeletal stability. A mean horizontal relapse of 0.42 mm (8%) and a mean vertical increase in lower face height of 0.2 mm were found six months after surgery. Both were statistically insignificant. The mean backward rotation of the mandible of 0.55 degrees found six months after surgery was statistically significant (P less than 0.015), but was considered to be clinically insignificant. The results of this study show that surgical mandibular advancement with rigid fixation is a very reliable and stable procedure.     

下颌骨自动旋转中心与上颌骨上抬量的相关性研究

目的： 探讨Le Fort I型截骨术上抬上颌骨时下颌骨自动旋转中心的位置,下颌骨自动旋转中心与上颌骨上抬量、下颌骨长度和下颌平面角的关系。方法：选取25例单纯采用Le Fort I型截骨术上抬上颌骨矫治垂直向发育过度的患者,测量其术前、术后头颅定位侧位片。利用Reuleaux法测量实际下颌骨旋转中心。采用SPSS13.0软件包对ANS、PNS上抬量、下颌骨长度、MP-SN角度与下颌骨自动旋转中心进行Pearson相关和线性回归分析。结果：下颌骨自动旋转中心平均位于髁突中点下方15.64 mm,后方0.82 mm处。ANS点和PNS点上抬量、下颌骨长度与下颌骨自动旋转中心位置相关,MP-SN角度与下颌骨旋转中心垂直向位置相关。结论：下颌骨自动旋转中心位于髁突外,其与上颌骨上抬量、下颌骨长度和下颌平面角相关。     

Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.

PURPOSE: This study examined the stability of skeletal changes after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid or wire fixation up to 2 years postoperatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects for this multisite, prospective, clinical trial received rigid (n = 78) or wire (n = 49) fixation. The rigid cases were fixed with three 2-mm bicortical position screws and 1 to 2 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with elastics, and the wire fixation subjects were fixed with inferior border wires and had 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained before orthodontics, immediately before surgery, and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Mean anterior sagittal advancement of the mandibular symphysis was 4.92 +/3.01 mm in the rigid group and 5.11 +/- 3.09 mm in the wire group, and the inferior vertical displacement was 3.37 +/- 2.44 in the rigid group and 2.85 +/- 1.78 in the wire group. The vertical changes were similar in both groups. Two years postsurgery, the wire group had 30% sagittal relapse of the mandibular symphysis, whereas there was no change in the rigid group (P < .001). Both groups experienced changes in the orientation and configuration of the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid fixation is a more stable method than wire fixation for maintaining mandibular advancement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.     

Neurosensory differences after wire and rigid fixation in patients with mandibular advancement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis was to compare the frequency and severity of nerve damage with rigid and wire fixation in patients participating in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients who required a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and mandibular advancement were randomly assigned to receive either rigid or wire fixation. Tactile sensation in the mental nerve region bilaterally was determined presurgically and throughout the subsequent 2 years by using monofilament detection and brush stroke direction. Neurosensory levels were compared between the types of fixation over time. RESULTS: Evaluation with monofilament detection showed no significant difference between types of fixation throughout the 2-year follow-up. However, brush stroke determination showed significantly greater hypesthesia with rigid compared with wire fixation from 8 weeks through 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Rigid fixation resulted in more anesthesia in the mental nerve distribution than wire fixation when tested with brush stroke direction. However, increased anesthesia was not present when measured with monofilament determination.     

Causes, location, and timing of relapse following rigid fixation after mandibular advancement

The purpose of this study was to evaluate two different groups of patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. One group demonstrated no relapse, whereas a second group had documented relapse. The following questions were asked: 1) What factors contribute to relapse? 2) At what site in the mandible is movement seen? and 3) During what period does movement occur? A retrospective lateral cephalometric serial analysis was performed on 50 patients at multiple time intervals. Criteria for a candidate include 1) mandibular advancement surgery with rigid fixation, with or without genioplasty, 2) no maxillary surgery, and 3) relapse of 25% or more of the advancement. Of the 50 patients analyzed, 13 (26%) showed relapse of 25% or more and served as the relapse group. Twelve patients showed no relapse and served as the comparison group. Multiple-regression analysis for the relapse group showed that magnitude of advancement, increasing gonial arc and changing mandibular plane significantly accounted for 84.9% of the variance observed in relapse (P less than .001). Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the majority of relapse occurred in the first 6 weeks after surgery (68%, P less than .05). Results of a paired t test showed that a significant change occurred in all the linear and angular measures except SN-AR-GO (P less than .05).     

A comparison of stimulated bite force after mandibular advancement using rigid and nonrigid fixation

This study evaluated maximum stimulated molar bite force following advancement of the mandible in 17 adult Macaca mulatta using rigid and nonrigid fixation techniques. Cephalometric analysis was also performed to determine the amount of proximal segment rotation. Analysis of the bite force showed the animals whose mandibles were advanced using rigid fixation to have significantly greater bite force at six weeks postsurgery when compared to those animals who underwent mandibular advancement and six weeks of maxillomandibular fixation. By the ninth postoperative week, there was no longer any significant difference between the two groups, indicating a rapid recovery of muscle function in the animals whose mandibles were immobilized following advancement. Both groups, however, had significant decreases in bite force at 12 weeks postsurgery when compared to preoperative values. Neither group had a significant amount of proximal segment rotation from the surgery.     

A comparative study of temporomandibular symptoms following mandibular advancement by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: rigid versus nonrigid fixation

Rigid fixation to attach proximal and distal segments during bony healing of osteotomy sites has become increasingly popular. The effects of rigid fixation on the temporomandibular joints have been questioned. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of rigid fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomies on temporomandibular dysfunction symptoms. Forty patients who had mandibular advancement surgery were evaluated for temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Twenty had received rigid fixation, and twenty had received nonrigid fixation. It was determined that there was no statistically significant difference in temporomandibular signs or symptoms between patients who were treated with rigid internal fixation for bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular advancement and those patients who were treated with nonrigid wire fixation.     

Stability of maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and porous-block hydroxyapatite grafting: cleft palate versus non-cleft patients

This study was undertaken to evaluate the stability of maxillary advancement using bone plates for skeletal stabilization and porous block hydroxyapatite (PBHA) as a bone graft substitute for interpositional grafting in cleft and non-cleft patients. The records of 74 patients (41 females, 33 males) who underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and PBHA interpositional grafting were evaluated retrospectively. All patients also underwent simultaneous sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomies. Patients were divided into 2 groups for study purposes: group 1 consisted of 17 cleft palate patients and group 2 consisted of 57 non-cleft patients. Each group was further subdivided into 2 subgroups based on the concurrent vertical positioning of the maxillary incisors: groups 1a and 2a, where the maxilla underwent 3 mm or more of inferior repositioning, and groups 1b and 2b, where the maxilla underwent minimal vertical change (< or = 1 mm). Presurgery, immediate postsurgery, and longest follow-up lateral cephalometric tracings were superimposed and analyzed to calculate surgical change and long-term stability of results by assessing horizontal and vertical changes at point A, incisor superius, and the mesial cusp tip of maxillary first molar. The average follow-up time in group 1 was 37.9 months (range 12 to 136) and in group 2 was 28.77 months (range 17 to 88). Average maxillary advancement at point A was: group 1a, 5.4 mm; group 1b, 5.25 mm; group 2a, 5.48 mm; group 2b, 5.46 mm. Average relapse at point A was: group 1a, -0.75 mm; group 1b, -1 mm; group 2a, -0.47 mm; group 2b, -0.48 mm. Average horizontal and/or vertical relapse at the central incisors and first molars was 1 mm or less in group 1 and less than 0.5 mm in group 2. Although there was a slightly greater relapse in group 1, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Maxillary advancement with Le Fort 1 osteotomies using rigid fixation and interpositional PBHA grafting during bimaxillary surgery is a stable procedure with good predictability in cleft and non-cleft patients, regardless of the direction of vertical maxillary movement.