Comparison and optimal use of fixed combinations in the management of COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Indications for the use of long-acting β₂-agonists (LABAs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with COPD are described in the various international guidelines, but no special recommendations are made concerning the use of combination inhalers containing a LABA as well as an ICS. To determine the place of combination inhalers in the treatment of COPD we reviewed recent literature concerning this subject. On molecular level ICS/LABA combination therapy has anti-inflammatory properties which cannot be attributed to ICS alone. All clinical studies indicate that the two available combinations (salmeterol/fluticasone and formoterol/budesonide) significantly reduce exacerbation rate of moderate/severe exacerbations when compared with placebo. Some studies also showed a significant reduction in exacerbation rate compared with LABA monotherapy, but not compared with ICS monotherapy. From the patient’s perspective, ICS/LABA combination inhalers are the first choice when both need to be prescribed, possibly improving patient compliance for ICS. Currently little evidence is available to predict if flexible treatment with LABA/ICS combination inhalers will improve disease control in COPD. Further studies are needed to elucidate the clinical benefit of combination inhalers versus the individual components in different inhalers, and to investigate the clinical benefit of flexible dosing of combination inhalers in patients with COPD.     

Combination Inhalers Containing Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-Acting β2-Agonists: Improved Clinical Efficacy and Dosing Options in Patients with Asthma

Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β₂-agonists (LABA) is a recognized treatment for adults with moderate to severe asthma. The introduction of inhalers containing both an ICS and a LABA simplifies treatment and improves asthma control. This review discusses clinical evidence that budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone are effective and well tolerated in asthma treatment. Moreover, the rapid onset of effect and long duration of action of budesonide and formoterol make once-daily dosing, adjustable maintenance dosing, and the novel treatment strategy of using budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and as needed for symptom relief, valuable treatment options for patients with asthma.     

Economic evaluation of treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists in a health maintenance organization

OBJECTIVES: In light of recent results from observational studies showing prolonged survival in subjects taking long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) and/or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we investigated their cost-effectiveness (CE). METHODS: Costs and survival data were collected for a sample of members enrolled in a large Health Maintenance Organization in the United States. An observational study design was used to evaluate cumulative costs and health benefits of LABA, ICS, ICS+LABA, or comparison drugs. Survival was estimated using a parametric regression model. Costs were adjusted for censoring and prognostic factors. CE was evaluated over a time horizon of 36 months and the remaining lifetime of subjects. RESULTS: Over 36 months, life expectancy and costs were: 2.4 years (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3; 2.5) and $28,030 (CI: $23,400; $33,570) for not receiving ICS or LABA; 2.6 years (CI: 2.6; 2.7) and $35,170 (CI: $29,970; $40,620) for ICS alone; 2.6 years (CI: 2.5; 2.7) and $27,380 (CI: $21,780; $32,510) for LABA alone; and, 2.7 years (CI: 2.6; 2.8) and $33,780 (CI: $28,700; $39,440) for subjects treated with ICS+LABA. The lifetime analysis showed similar trends. CONCLUSIONS: There is an acute need to find effective, life-extending treatments for persons with COPD. ICS, LABA or their combination represent promising treatment options and are currently being tested in randomized trials. If the impact on survival seen in these trials compares to that seen in observational studies, LABA and the combination treatment are likely to be cost-effective in the United States.     

Effect of switching from salmeterol/fluticasone to formoterol/ budesonide combinations in patients with uncontrolled asthma

BackgroundCombination therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) in a single inhaler is the mainstay of asthma management and salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) and fixed-dose formoterol/budesonide combination (FBC) are currently available in Japan; however, there is nothing to choose between the two. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of switching from SFC to FBC in patients with asthma not adequately controlled under the former treatment regimen.MethodsThis was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled longitudinal study in 87 adult patients with an Asthma Control Questionnaire, 5-item version (ACQ5) score of greater than 0.75 under treatment with SFC 50/250 μg one inhalation twice daily (bid). SFC was switched to FBC 4.5/160 μg two inhalations bid. Study outcomes included ACQ5 score, peak expiratory flow (PEF), FEV₁, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) at the end of treatment period.ResultsEighty-three patients completed the study. ACQ5 scores improved and exceeded the clinically meaningful difference after 12 weeks of treatment and well-controlled asthma (ACQ5 score ≤ 0.75) was attained in 37 (44.6%) patients. Minimum and maximum PEF and FEV₁ values improved significantly, but not FeNO values, after switching from SFC to FBC.ConclusionsSwitching ICS/LABA combination therapy is a useful option in the management of asthma that is not optimally controlled.     

Long-term studies on long-acting sympathomimetics

Long-term treatment studies with formoterol and salmeterol show that these inhaled long-actingβ ₂-agonists compared to availableβ ₂-agonists produce better bronchodilation, decrease the need for additional doses, decrease asthma symptoms, and are strongly preferred by the patients. Development of tolerance has not been found. One case history indicates that these effective bronchodilators might mask deterioration of asthma.     

Effective management of COPD in primary care - the role of long-acting beta agonist/inhaled corticosteroid combination therapy.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the internationally preferred term for chronic, progressive lung disorders which are characterised by airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. The symptoms of COPD - including breathlessness, cough, excessive sputum production and reduced muscle tone and muscle wasting - reflect the complex pathophysiology of the disease. In order to address these symptoms, treatment regimens should take into account the multiple components that contribute to COPD. Clinical evidence has emerged indicating that, especially in patients with severe COPD, long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABAs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) result in improvements in symptoms, reduce the frequency and severity of exacerbations, and improve health-related quality of life. This review evaluates the clinical evidence for the potential of LABA/ICS treatment to address the symptoms of COPD and whether combination therapy of this nature adds significant benefit to patients.     

Beta2-agonists potentiate corticosteroid-induced neutrophil survival

Neutrophils are considered to play a role in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and severe asthma. Recent guidelines recommend the use of a combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) in the treatment of COPD with exacerbations and asthma not adequately controlled by ICS alone. LABA have been proposed to have a synergistic effect with corticosteroids by activating glucocorticoid receptors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of beta2-agonists on the inhibitory effects of corticosteroids on human neutrophil apoptosis. In addition, the effects of beta2-agonists on spontaneous neutrophil apoptosis and on GM-CSF- and LTB4-afforded survival were also evaluated. Neutrophils were isolated from human blood under sterile conditions and cultured for 16 hours. Apoptosis was assessed by relative DNA fragmentation assay. Morphological analysis was used as a control method to confirm the occurrence of apoptosis. Salbutamol, formoterol and salmeterol prolonged the lifespan of budesonide- and fluticasone propionate-treated neutrophils by inhibiting apoptosis. Formoterol and salbutamol partly reversed the inhibitory effect of GM-CSF on neutrophil apoptosis. In contrast, the effects of beta(2)-agonists on spontaneous neutrophil apoptosis and on LTB(4)-afforded survival were negligible. beta2-agonists potentiate corticosteroid-induced neutrophil survival at clinically relevant drug concentrations. Whether these effects translate into clinically relevant changes in lung neutrophil numbers remains to be demonstrated.     

The role of combination therapy with corticosteroids and long-acting ��2-agonists in the prevention of exacerbations in COPD

Acute exacerbations of COPD can complicate the course of the disease in patients with severe airway obstruction. Reduction of exacerbations is an important clinical outcome in evaluating new therapies in COPD. Combination therapies with long-acting β-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids have now been approved for use. Three 1-year randomized clinical trials, which studied the effect of combining a long-acting β₂-agonist with an inhaled corticosteroid in COPD, documented that exacerbation frequency was lower with therapy than placebo. Combination therapy had a similar effect to its monocomponents in the trial evaluating salmeterol/fluticasone combination. However, when patients with more severe COPD were studied using a combination of budesonide and formoterol, a clear improvement was seen in the overall exacerbation rates compared with the use of a long-acting β₂-agonist alone.     

Formoterol in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Bronchodilators represent the hallmark of symptomatic treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). There are four categories of bronchodilators: anticholinergics, methylxanthines, short-acting β₂-agonists, and long-acting β₂-agonists such as formoterol. Significant research has been performed to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of formoterol in the therapeutic field of COPD. Formoterol exhibits a rapid onset of bronchodilation similar to that observed with salbutamol, yet its long bronchodilatory duration is comparable to salmeterol. In addition, formoterol presents with a clear superiority in lung function improvement compared with either ipratropium bromide or oral theophylline, while its efficacy improves when administered in combination with ipratropium. Formoterol has been shown to better reduce dynamic hyperinflation, which is responsible for exercise intolerance and dyspnea in COPD patients, compared with other bronchodilators, whereas it exerts synergistic effect with tiotropium. Moreover, formoterol reduces exacerbations, increases days free of use of rescue medication and improves patients’ quality of life and disease symptoms. Formoterol has a favorable safety profile and is better tolerated than theophylline. Collectively, data extracted from multicenter clinical trials support formoterol as a valid therapeutic option in the treatment of COPD.     

Treatment of Persistent Asthma With Symbicort® (Budesonide/Formoterol Inhalation Aerosol): An Inhaled Corticosteroid and Long-Acting β2-Adrenergic Agonist in One Pressurized Metered-Dose Inhaler

Objective. Budesonide/formoterol inhalation aerosol (Symbicort® AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Delaware) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting β₂-adrenergic agonist (LABA) combination administered twice daily via one hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) approved in the United States for the long-term maintenance treatment of persistent asthma in patients ≥12 years of age whose asthma cannot be controlled by an ICS alone. The objective was to review efficacy, safety, and pharmacogenetic data on budesonide/formoterol pMDI in the treatment of persistent asthma. Methods. The authors searched PubMed and respiratory meeting databases to identify asthma studies of budesonide/formoterol pMDI. Studies involving traditional and patient-reported outcomes, safety, tolerability, or pharmacogenetics were included. Results. In two 12-week pivotal trials in adolescents and adults, treatment with budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/4.5 μg × 2 inhalations (320/9 μg) twice daily for moderate to severe persistent asthma or 80/4.5 μg × 2 inhalations (160/9 μg) twice daily for mild to moderate persistent asthma, demonstrated greater efficacy and similar tolerability compared with placebo and the same nominal dose of its monocomponents. Comparisons with formoterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) for predose forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) and with budesonide pMDI for 12-hour mean postdose FEV₁ demonstrated the anti-inflammatory and bronchodilatory contributions of budesonide and formoterol, respectively. Evaluations of patient-reported outcomes, including asthma-specific quality of life and treatment satisfaction, further supported the clinical benefits of budesonide/formoterol pMDI. In a 52-week tolerability study of patients aged ≥12 years, budesonide/formoterol pMDI was delivered at up to double the maximum dose (640/18 μg twice daily) and demonstrated a safety profile similar to that of budesonide (640 μg twice daily), with no unexpected pattern of abnormalities. Additional studies reported that budesonide/formoterol pMDI 320/9 μg twice daily and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol DPI 250/50 μg twice daily have similar efficacy and tolerability, with significantly more patients achieving ≥15% improvement in FEV₁ within 15 minutes with budesonide/formoterol pMDI compared with fluticasone/salmeterol DPI. Moreover, inheritance of the Gly16Arg polymorphism of the β₂-adrenergic receptor does not appear to affect clinical outcomes with budesonide/formoterol pMDI. Conclusion. Budesonide/formoterol pMDI administered twice daily is effective and generally well tolerated in patients whose asthma is not well controlled on ICS alone.     

The Long and Short of β2-agonists

For patients whose asthma is not adequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy alone, increasing the dose of ICS or the addition of a long-acting β₂-agonist is recommended. Greater improvements in lung function are achieved with the addition of a long-acting β₂-agonist to ICS therapy, rather than doubling the dose of ICS. Formoterol and salmeterol have a similarly long duration of effect (up to 12 h). However, as a result of their different chemical structures, there are marked pharmacological differences in the mechanism of action which affect their speeds of onset. These differences amount to a more rapid onset of effect for formoterol compared with salmeterol. Long-acting β₂-agonists appear to be well tolerated at elevated doses. These two features (tolerability at high doses and rapid onset of effect) support the use of formoterol as a reliever medication in addition to use in maintenance therapy. The long-acting β₂-agonists can be considered as beneficial additions to ICS therapy for the management of moderate-to-severe asthma.     

Combination Inhalers Containing Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-Acting β2-Agonists: Improved Clinical Efficacy and Dosing Options in Patients with Asthma

Combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β₂-agonists (LABA) is a recognized treatment for adults with moderate to severe asthma. The introduction of inhalers containing both an ICS and a LABA simplifies treatment and improves asthma control. This review discusses clinical evidence that budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone are effective and well tolerated in asthma treatment. Moreover, the rapid onset of effect and long duration of action of budesonide and formoterol make once-daily dosing, adjustable maintenance dosing, and the novel treatment strategy of using budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and as needed for symptom relief, valuable treatment options for patients with asthma.     

Salmeterol/fluticasone combination in the treatment of COPD

Clinical trials of a combination therapy of an inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP), with a long-acting β₂-agonist, salmeterol (Sal), have demonstrated a greater improvement in lung function and in quality of life measures after the combination compared with either component of alone. In a subanalysis of the data of the TRISTAN study, Sal/FP reduced exacerbation rates in COPD patients with a baseline FEV₁<50% of predicted. A combination therapy of budesonide and formoterol improved quality of life and FEV₁, and reduced exacerbations better than either component alone. In studies of FP or of Sal/FP in COPD, there was a reduction in all-cause mortality by 25% relative to placebo. Sal/FP has anti-inflammatory effects in COPD airways. FP inhibits markers of systemic inflammation, and it is not known whether Sal/FP has an advantage over FP alone. While long-acting β₂-agonists such as Sal can be recommended for treatment of moderate COPD, addition of inhaled steroid therapy such as FP should be considered in more severe disease.     

Long‐acting muscarinic antagonist + long‐acting beta agonist versus long‐acting beta agonist + inhaled corticosteroid for COPD: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Some trials have been conducted to compare long‐acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) + long‐acting beta agonist (LABA) versus LABA + inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but no meta‐analysis were reported. Two investigators independently searched for eligible articles using the PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane databases. Articles in authors' reference files were also regarded as candidates. The eligibility criteria for the current meta‐analysis were original trials written in English comparing the impact of LAMA + LABA and LABA + ICS for COPD patients. A pooled value for the continuous value was calculated using the genetic inverse variance method for mean difference. Incidence of events was evaluated using the odds ratio (OR). Minimal clinically important difference were 50 mL for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), four points for St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and one point for transition dyspnoea index (TDI). We included seven randomized controlled trials and one cross‐over trial with follow‐up period of 6–26 weeks. Compared with LABA + ICS, LAMA + LABA led to significantly greater improvements of trough FEV₁ by 71 (95% CI: 48–95) mL, TDI by 0.38 points (95% CI: 0.17–0.58), less exacerbations with an OR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.62–0.96) and less pneumonia with an OR of 0.28 (95% CI: 0.12–0.68). Frequencies of any adverse event, serious adverse event, adverse event leading to discontinuation, all‐cause death and change of total score of SGRQ were not different in both arms. LAMA + LABA might be a better option for treating COPD than LABA + ICS.     

Switching from salmeterol/fluticasone to formoterol/budesonide combinations improves peripheral airway/alveolar inflammation in asthma

BackgroundCombination therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) in a single inhaler is the mainstay of asthma management. We previously showed that switching from salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) 50/250 μg bid to a fixed-dose formoterol/budesonide combination (FBC) 9/320 μg bid improved asthma control and pulmonary functions, but not fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), in patients with asthma not adequately controlled under the former treatment regimen.ObjectiveTo assess whether switching from SFC to FBC improves peripheral airway/alveolar inflammation in asthma (UMIN000009619).MethodsSubjects included 66 patients with mild to moderate asthma receiving SFC 50/250 μg bid for more than 8 weeks. Patients were randomized into FBC 9/320 μg bid or continued the same dose of SFC for 12 weeks. Asthma Control Questionnaire, 5-item version (ACQ5) score, peak expiratory flow, spirometry, FeNO, alveolar NO concentration (CANO), and maximal NO flux in the conductive airways (J’awNO) were measured.ResultsSixty-one patients completed the study. The proportion of patients with an improvement in ACQ5 was significantly higher in the FBC group than in the SFC group (51.6% vs 16.7%, respectively, p = 0.003). A significant decrease in CANO was observed in the FBC group (from 8.8 ± 9.2 ppb to 4.0 ± 2.6 ppb; p = 0.007) compared to the SFC group (from 7.4 ± 7.8 ppb to 6.4 ± 5.0 ppb; p = 0.266) although there was no significant difference in the changes in pulmonary functions between the 2 groups. Similar significant differences were found in the CANO corrected for the axial back diffusion of NO (FBC, from 6.5 ± 8.2 ppb to 2.3 ± 2.5 ppb; and SFC, from 4.3 ± 5.3 ppb to 3.9 ± 4.3 ppb). There was no difference in the changes in FeNO or J’awNO between the 2 groups.ConclusionsSwitching therapy from SFC to FBC improves asthma control and peripheral airway/alveolar inflammation even though there is no improvement in pulmonary functions, and FeNO in asthmatic patients.     

Adherence to Long-Acting Inhaled Therapies among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Abstract

Background: Long-acting inhaled medications are an important component of the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet few studies have examined the determinants of medication adherence among this patient population. Objective: We sought to identify factors associated with adherence to long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) among patients with COPD. Methods: We performed secondary analysis of baseline data collected in a randomized trial of 376 Veterans with spirometrically confirmed COPD. We used electronic pharmacy records to assess adherence, defined as a medication possession ratio of ≥0.80. We investigated the following exposures: patient characteristics, disease severity, medication regimen complexity, health behaviors, confidence in self-management, and perceptions of provider skill. We performed multivariable logistic regression, clustered by provider, to estimate associations. Results: Of the 167 patients prescribed LABA, 54% (n = 90) were adherent to therapy while only 40% (n = 74) of 184 the patients prescribed ICS were adherent. Higher adherence to LABA and ICS was associated with patient perception of their provider as being an “expert” in diagnosing and managing lung disease [For LABA: OR = 21.70 (95% CI 6.79, 69.37); For ICS OR = 7.93 (95% CI 1.71, 36.67)]. Factors associated with adherence to LABA, but not ICS, included: age, education, race, COPD severity, smoking status, and confidence in self-management. Conclusions: Adherence to long-acting inhaled medications among patients with COPD is poor, and determinants of adherence likely differ by medication class. Patient perception of clinician expertise in lung disease was the factor most highly associated with adherence to long-acting therapies.     

Duration of Action of Inhaled vs. Intravenous β2-Adrenoceptor Agonists in an Anaesthetized Guinea-pig Model

We compared the duration of action of the short-acting α₂-adrenoceptor agonist salbutamol and the long-acting α₂-adrenoceptor agonists salmeterol and formoterol when administered iv or by inhalation in a histamine-induced bronchoconstriction model in the guinea-pig. Following aerosol dosing, maximal bronchoprotector effects were seen for salbutamol, salmeterol and formoterol at concentrations of 1 mg/ml, 100 μ g/ml and 30 μ g/ml respectively, giving a potency order of formoterol > salmeterol > salbutamol. All displayed similar maximum effects in this system. A maximal concentration of salbutamol showed bronchoprotection at 1 h but not at 3 h post-dosing whereas maximal concentrations of formoterol and salmeterol showed protection up to 5 h post-aqueous-aerosol dosing, giving a duration order of salmeterol > formoterol > salbutamol. All three α₂-adrenoceptor agonists showed dose-dependent bronchoprotection and duration of action following intravenous administration; salbutamol and salmeterol were equipotent and both were less potent than formoterol. Bronchoprotection obtained with sub-maximal concentrations of all three α₂-adrenoceptor agonists faded within 30 min following iv administration, but this could be extended by increasing the doses. These results demonstrate that the route of administration is important in determining the duration of action of α₂-adrenoceptor agonists in the lung. Furthermore, such findings lend support to the suggestion that the physico-chemical characteristics of salmeterol govern its duration of action rather than sustained binding of this agonist to a α₂-adrenoceptor exo-site.